Medical weapons and fake data sets; how destruction multiplies

by Jon Rappoport

October 6, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

The mainstream reports I’m including in this article—I’ve written about them before. They form a grotesque track record of medical-cartel harm inflicted on the population.

I give you these reports again to point out how fake data sets multiply and spread, causing even more destruction.

For example—let’s consider a drug called X. In fact, it is killing patients. However, studies of X published in leading medical journals report glowing results.

Those studies are then cited by researchers who publish more positive material on the drug.

Doctors, reading all these studies, continue to prescribe the killer X to their patients.

Pharmaceutical companies, seeing the profit picture of X, formulate their own versions of the drug, and market them—multiplying the killer effects throughout the population.

In the burgeoning field of AI medicine, which is increasingly used to automatically diagnose symptoms and prescribe drugs, X takes its place in MANY data sets as a powerful and safe remedy.

Medical schools, internship and residence programs blindly follow suit, using X and its knockoffs in standard treatment protocols.

Insurance companies, in their data sets, favor X and its cousins and cover claims based on the prescription of these drugs.

In every venue, data sets that mention killer X laud it as a useful tool in treating patients.

The fraud is deeply embedded, and the murders expand.

It’s an example of the old adage, “Garbage in, garbage out,” except in the field of medicine it’s, “Killing in, killing out.”


ONE: “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the 2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.

Donald Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)

TWO: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.”

The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:

Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.

Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.

The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.”

So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.

THREE: July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.

I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust. She answered a resounding NO. She also said her estimate of medically caused deaths in America was on the conservative side.

FOUR: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”

The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”

Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency knows the truth.

FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.

Medical crimes.

Medically caused deaths of friends, family members, loved ones, who are buried along with the truth.

No criminal investigations, no prosecutions, no guilty verdicts, no prison sentences.

But of course, you can believe everything leading lights of the US medical system tell you about COVID.

You can believe everything the press—who buries the truth about this medical holocaust—tells you about COVID.

Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I’ve just cited and described in this article, it’s obvious that…

Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs…

Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.

Indeed, here is a stunning quote from an editor who has quite probably read and analyzed more medical-drug studies than any doctor in the world:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”)

Compare that quote with one from “the father of COVID science,” Tony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated: “Anybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they’re talking about…If something is published in places like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA—you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things very seriously.”

They take things so seriously, they routinely publish glowing studies of medical drugs that are killing people in great numbers.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

15 comments on “Medical weapons and fake data sets; how destruction multiplies

  1. RT says:

    Is it possible to include links to the studies you cite?

  2. Paul says:

    “Someone said to the President

    There is a fellow by the name of Rowan who will find Garcia for you, if anybody can.”

    ~ HNP

  3. Roundball Shaman says:

    “Doctors, reading all these studies, continue to prescribe the killer X to their patients.
    Pharmaceutical companies, seeing the profit picture of X, formulate their own versions of the drug, and market them—multiplying the killer effects throughout the population.”

    The new (and only) medical profession tenet and creed: “Do NOTHING BUT HARM…”

  4. Sean says:

    Out of all those numbers, it didn’t even include the vaccine maiming or deaths. Wow!

    So that is how it is done. First through the medical journals. That is some serious investigating. Providing admissions straight from the horses mouth.

    What a deadly con game that has been working so sweetly for so long. They must do all of this because this criminal con works so very well.

    Humans must be incredibly impressionable, including our fellow highly intelligent well meaning doctors and nurses, because there is no way they would go along with what they are part of doing IF they were aware of this false data that is fed to them from these journals. Centralized false and deadly data that they all refer too. They wouldn’t. Professional trickery done on them to make us all believe it. Thank goodness for the many MDs that are also naturopathics now. There is a great out for them.

  5. Jim S Smith says:

    You can add to this, the stunning revelation from:


    The proof can be stated to be UNDENIABLE – that these NOT-“vaccines” actually INCREASE hospitalizations and severity of illnesses in the “vaxxed” part of the population!

    The evidence just keeps growing, but very few are listening! ! !

  6. Firestarter says:

    And then they discuss how to stage a pandemic to get everybody mRNA vaxxed…
    In October 2019, there was a panel discussion hosted by the Milken Institute on the need for a universal mRNA flu vaccine.
    This discussion in October 2019, wasn’t long after the August 2019 BlackRock “going direct” plan and shortly before the first stories emerged of an outbreak in Wuhan, China (that was later dubbed COVID-19).
    At the end of the 1:51 minute clip Rick Bright (director of HHS BARDA) explains how an outbreak could start in “China”, which could be used to “print” the mRNA vaccines:
    “that an outbreak of a novel… virus could occur in China somewhere, we could get the RNA sequence from that, beam that to a number of regional centers if not local if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer.”

  7. Rico Debiase says:

    The FULL video:

    Fauci and others Planned for a “Universal Flu Vaccine” in 2019 that Became the “COVID” Vaccine

  8. Tracy Kolenchuk says:

    Most medicines make no attempt to cure. Cured is not even defined scientifically or medically for most diseases – so there is no ability, much less interest in studying cure.

    If a medicine cures, or leads to a cure, the results are unambiguous. But most medicines show “measurable improvements” in some aspects of the patient’s signs and symptoms. These “measurable improvements” are hilited and so-called “side effects” – increases in negative aspects of the disease, might be counted, but are not measured.

    It’s non-curative statistical nonsense. A cure is the best preventative.

    To your health,


  9. Mika says:

    Good article today Jon. Somewhere out there, I can’t recall who/when/where, there’s a valid study that found that MORE THAN HALF of peer-reviewed “professional journal” research, presents false/fraudulent findings/results.

    Would love to see you dig that one up if you know what I’m talking about. It may not apply wholly to medical papers, but it’s telling nonetheless.

    Do you know the media magnate who started “Elsevier”?

  10. Tim says:

    The Spiritual Solution is the only solution. An idea that is alien to the aliens.

    IT cannot be “quantified” nor predicted, nor limited in any way. And IT cannot be stopped, only delayed.

    True Will Rules The Real.

  11. 'Tween Heaven & Earth says:

    Speaking of vaccines, I am weary of the “safe and effective” line given to previous ones. Where are the longitudinal studies and follow-ups that would prove that none of the conventional vaccines were either safe or effective? Because it seems like people now want to compare the current “gene treatments“ with old-style vaccinations and I am not sure any vaccine could ever have been considered safe or effective. (See as an example Suzanne Humphries, MD, Dissolving Illusions.)

    I grew up in a family where a parent worked for pediatricians and I got everything available at the time—oral polio, DPT, MMR, influenza, and participation in the 1976 swine flu vax program (or so there is a notation in my chart). No one ever followed up with me on that one. And not following any others, either, did they check to see what kinds of possible adverse effects I suffered, including endocrine disruption, neuro issues, cardio, etc. I cannot help, but wonder whether some of my chronic issues are because of these things I had in childhood and into my teens, even though back then, there were way fewer than now. My parents also were vaccinated. An autoimmune issue took about 30 years to show up in me. Is it connected to those childhood vaccines? I will never know.

    To me, good health is our human birthright and nothing and no one should have the power to interfere with that, and I mean this from the macro (polluting chemicals and genes) to the micro—how we eat and live on a daily basis, which is our responsibility. But when there is so much of the former (pollutants), it makes it harder to follow through on the latter.

  12. Build Back Botter says:

    More people need to hear their experiences post-jab:


    • We are a large and ever growing group of Americans who were previously healthy and have been seriously injured by the COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J as well as Astra Zeneca in the clinical trial stage in the United States).

  13. George McFetridge says:

    Good to see you on board with Dr Andrew Kaufman and a growing number of medical professionals both with a conscience and the ability to question. Dr K himself has discussed how hard it was for him to abandon his conditioned beliefs in pharmaceuticals. The conditioning goes very deep over multiple generations, resulting in a kind of perfect crime committed in 2020. This horror has to collapse..

  14. T Riley says:

    To validate this article, all you have to do is watch television for a couple of hours and count the number of attorney commercials that state “if you or a family member been injured or killed by drug xyz, then give us a call”. If they drugs are so great and safe, there would be no need for these commercials. I do not trust the FDA’s approval of any drug.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *