The non-existent virus; an explosive interview with Christine Massey

by Jon Rappoport

October 7, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

With a background in biostatistics, Christine Massey has been using Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests as a research tool, as a diamond drill, to unearth the truth about SARS-CoV-2. As in: Does the virus exist?

Her approach has yielded shocking results.

In a half-sane world, Christine’s work would win many awards, and rate far-reaching coverage. In the present world, more and more people, on their own, are waking up to her findings and completely revising their perception of the “pandemic.”

Here is my recent interview with the brilliant relentless Christine Massey:

Q: You and your colleagues have made many FOIA requests to public health agencies around the world. You’ve been asking for records that show the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. How did you develop this approach?

A: In 2014, a lady in Edmonton submitted a freedom of information request to Health Canada asking for studies relating to the addition of hydrofluorosilisic acid (industrial waste fluoride acid) to public drinking water (water fluoridation). HealthCanada’s response indicated that they had no studies whatsoever to back up their claims that the practice is safe or effective.

A few years later, some high quality government-funded studies showed that common fluoride exposure levels during pregnancy are associated with lower IQs and increased ADHD symptoms in offspring. Nevertheless, dentists and the public health community continued to promote and defend the so-called “great public health achievement” of forcing this controversial preventative dental treatment onto entire communities, and were dismissive of those studies. So I used freedom of information requests to show that various institutions promoting and defending water fluoridation in Ontario, Alberta and Washington State could not provide or cite even one primary study indicating safety with respect to those outcomes.

So once I learned from people like David Crowe, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Thomas Cowan that the alleged [COVID] virus had never been isolated (purified) from a patient sample and then characterized, sequenced and studied with controlled experiments, and thus had never been shown to exist, I realized that freedom of information (FOI) requests could be used to verify their claims.

Most people are not going to take the time to check all of the so-called “virus isolation” studies for themselves, so FOIs were a way to 1) ensure that nothing had been overlooked, and 2) cut to the chase and back-up what these gentlemen [Kaufman, Cowan, Crowe, Lanka] were saying, if they were indeed correct.

So in May 2020 I began submitting FOI requests for any record held by the respective institution that describes the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient, by anyone, anywhere on the planet.

Q: How many public health and government agencies have you queried with FOIA requests?

A: I have personally queried and received responses from 22 Canadian institutions. These are public health institutions, universities that claim to have “isolated the virus”, and 3 police services – due to their enforcement of “COVID-19” restrictions. I have also personally received responses from several institutions outside of Canada including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). I await responses from a number of additional institutions.

Many people around the world have obtained responses to the same/similar, or related, [FOIA] requests, from institutions in their own countries. One person who has done a lot of work on this in New Zealand and other countries is my colleague Michael S. Also a fellow named Marc Horn obtained many in the UK. A handful of other people obtained several responses, and lots of people have obtained 1 or 2.

I have been compiling all of the responses that are sent to me on my FOI page, and as I type this (October 4, 2021) we have FOI responses from 104 institutions in well over 20 countries all relating to the purification/existence of the alleged virus. Additionally, there are court documents from South Africa and Portugal. In total, 110 instructions are represented at this moment on my website. There are FOI responses from more institutions that I haven’t had a chance to upload yet.

Q: How would you characterize the replies you’ve gotten from these agencies?

A: Every institution without exception has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing purification of the alleged virus from even 1 patient sample.

Twenty-one of the 22 Canadian institutions admitted flat out that they have no such records (as required by the Canadian legislation). Many institutions outside Canada have admitted the same, including the CDC (November 2, 2020), Australia’s Department of Health, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, the UK Department of Health and Social Care…

And in some cases, silly excuses were provided. For example, the Norwegian Directorate of Health’s response was that they do not own, store or control documents with information about patients. Public Health Wales told Dr. Janet Menage that they have not produced any such records, and that while they would normally be willing to point her towards records that are in the public domain it would be too difficult in this case.

Brazil’s FDA-like injection-approver, the Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), told Marcella Picone that they have no record of virus purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that the virus actually exists.

Q: What is the exact text of your FOIA requests?

The text has varied somewhat over time. For example, in the beginning I used the word “isolation”. But since that term gets abused so badly by virologists, I now stick to “purification”.

In all requests I specified exactly what I meant by isolation/purification (separation of the alleged virus from everything else), and that the purified particles should come directly from a sample taken from a diseased human where the patient sample was not first adulterated with any other source of genetic material (i.e. the monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells and the fetal bovine serum that are typically used in the bogus “virus isolation” studies).

I always clarified that I was not requesting records where researchers failed to purify the alleged virus and instead cultured something and/or performed a PCR test and/or sequenced something. I also clarified that I was requesting records authored by anyone, anywhere – not simply records that were created by the institution in question. And I requested citations for any record of purification that is held by the institution but already available to the public elsewhere.

The latest iteration [of the FOIA request] is posted on a page of my website where I encourage others to submit requests to institutions in their own country: Template for “SARS-COV-2 isolation” FOI requests.

Q: These agencies are all saying they have no records proving SARS-CoV-2 exists, but at the same time some of these agencies sponsor and fund studies that claim the virus does exist. How do you account for this contradiction?

I will address this by way of an example.

The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is the only Canadian institution that failed to provide a straightforward “no records” response thus far. Instead, they provided me with what they pretended were responsive records.

The records consisted of some emails, and a study by Bullard et al. that was supported by PHAC and their National Microbiology Laboratory, and by Manitoba Health and Manitoba’s Cadham Provincial Laboratory.

Neither the study nor the emails describe purification of the alleged virus from a patient sample or from anything else. The word “isolate” (or “isolation” / “purify” / “purification”) does not even appear, except in the study manuscript in the context of isolating people, not a virus.

…in the Materials And Methods section we find that these researchers performed PCR “tests” for a portion of the E gene sequence (not a virus), and they incubated patient samples (not a virus) on Vero cells (monkey kidney cells) supplemented with fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, and amphotericin B, and they monitored for harm to the monkey cells.

No virus was looked for in, or purified from, the patient samples. No control groups of any kind were implemented in the monkey cell procedures. No virus was required or shown to be involved anywhere in the study, but “it” was blamed for any harm to the monkey cells and “it” was referred to repeatedly throughout the study (I counted 26 instances).

Nevertheless, this was the sole paper provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

And although the researchers did not claim to have “isolated” the alleged virus in this paper, they performed the same sort of monkey business / cell culture procedure that is passed off as “virus isolation” by virologists in country after country. (Because virology is not a science.)

…Note the admission in the [study] Abstract: “RT-PCR detects RNA, not infectious virus”.

…So I wrote back to the Public Health Agency of Canada and advised the that none of the records they provided me actually describe separation of the alleged virus from everything else in a patient sample, and that I require an accurate response indicating that they have no responsive records.

In their revised response, the Agency insisted that the gold standard assay used to determine the presence of intact virus in patient samples is visible cytopathic [cell-killing] effects on cells in a cell culture, and that “PCR further confirms that intact virus is present”.

…As you have pointed out to your readers again and again: No one has isolated/purified “the virus”. They simply assume that patient samples contain “it” (based on meaningless PCR tests). They adulterate patient samples with genetic material and toxic drugs, starve the cells, then irrationally blame “the virus” for harm to the cells. They point to something that has never been purified, characterized, sequenced or studied scientifically, in a cell culture and insist “that’s the virus”. They fabricate the “genomes” from zillions of sequences detected in a soup. It’s all wild speculation and assumptions, zero science.

So the people responsible for the blatantly fraudulent claims made by these institutions are either wildly incompetent or intentionally lying.

—end of interview—

To bolster Christine’s final comments, these agencies will respond to FOIA requests with: “we have no records of virus purification”—and then sponsor studies that claim the virus HAS BEEN purified and discovered, because…

The standards for purifying the virus in the studies are no standards at all. They’re entirely irrational.

However, because Christine is very precise and accurate in her FOIA requests, when it comes to what purification means, the agencies are compelled to reply…

“Well, in THAT case, we have no records of virus purification…”

Meaning: There are no records showing the virus has been isolated; there are no records showing the virus exists.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

This entry was posted in Covid and tagged .

76 comments on “The non-existent virus; an explosive interview with Christine Massey

  1. Diane says:

    Thank you, Jon. I miss her on Twitter, where her account was taken down. Twitter is 100% intel owned and controlled, so it was just a matter of time, I guess. I’ll be sharing this today!

    • NoMoreLies says:

      Yes, ANYONE who uncovers the truth, is “Taken Down” or “Silenced” somehow. And, now…, they are silencing doctors. Corruption is so damn deep that those who watch mainstream news, have NO CLUE of what REALLY going on. And they still think it’s all about a “virus”.., that still has not been proven. I mean ISOLATED!

    • Dan says:

      Why is ANYONE still on Twitter?

      • Astraea says:

        I was wondering that too. Patrick Wood suggests boycotting Twitter and FB — immediately and completely and permanently.

        MeWe and Gab and Minds and FreedomSocial are better. Much better.

  2. Sean says:

    Outstanding work Christine Massey and Jon Rappoport! And Thank you!

    • Janet leslie says:

      I find it interesting that the death rate has not changed significantly in years. So called Covid patients are put on high air yield theyn will never come off. People with pnemonia must remain active. Stay in bed, you are dead. People dying of covid are people dying of pnemonia. Nurses use to get these people flushed out, antibiotics, up and walking, home in no time. When the nurses fear of covid makes it so they see them three times a day at meals, for meds to sedate. The patient lays there and dies. Since hundreds of thousands of people were suppose to have died of covid why isn’t this showing up on our increased death records? Why has the flu all but disappeared?

  3. Need A Ladder says:

    Santa Clause exists why not THE/VIRUS?

  4. Fron Elsewhere says:

    Not only it exists, it also mutated like Speedy, on to Delta, Miu and whatnot variants, just to panic and control people around the world. Vaccines in Israel, UK, Singapore, Korea proved their futility, but herds are driven to the third, fourth, fiftieth jab. Some insiders may feel criminaly dirty and speak out…

    • Brian Stanton says:

      Well what killed over 750,000 Americans? Was it a bio-weapon? What the hell is it?

      • Marilyn Shepherd says:

        Old age and a con. In the USA a ‘covid” death is anyone who has a positive PCR test run at 45 ct and dies within 60 days of any cause is called covid, here is the proof from NYC See where it says probable deaths, they died with maybe some symptom and when they started jabbing they removed the died within 60 days bit. But it was there – now they are dying from the jabs.

        To build the numbers places like Texas counted people between 100-110 with up to 7 co morbidities and almost all ”deaths with covid” had 4 pre existing conditions.

      • Roses are Red says:

        The majority of people that went into the hospitals never came out during that time. Some were neighbors in my community and the majority that stayed home and isolated a week later were fine. Hospitalized people were put on Remdesivir.

    • Ian Allan says:

      Ohh, I’m terribly afraid of μ! That’s what the Greeks always used to say when it hurt, and they all died, all of them without exception!

  5. James says:

    Its a shame people Like Jon and Christine are not US Senators. Then maybe we would get some TRUTH ! Keep up the great work both of you.

  6. George McFetridge says:

    There must be legal proceedings next, based on this. For example, one could, if in court charged with a ‘covid crime’ demand thru a subpoena, that the plaintiff produce proof that the virus exists. Thus out goes the charge. Just one way this can work to dismantle the biggest hoax in human history. I’m sure there are more usages for Ms Massey’s findings. Any lawyers reading this?

    • Astraea says:

      The Portuguese High Court did rule that the virus does not exist – I think quite early on during this incredible and disgusting scam.

      What kind of people did this?

    • Actually the extant legal proceeding prove the, at a minimum, egregious criminal incompetence of the appointed judges running the civil courts.

      And it is vastly more than coincidence that Canada figures rather centrally in all this.

      Believe it or not – ground-zero for all of this was a 1990 unanimous ratification by the Supreme Court of Canada of a unanimous decision of panel of ex-bank-lawyers calling themselves the Ontario Court of Appeal, that criminal / racketeering offences committed by corporations are not illegal because the criminal law only states that offenders will be severely punished but does not otherwise directly state: “Don’t do it”!

      Through binding international treaties and “level-playing-field” corporate policies the whole corporate-world globally went: YEE-HAW! Let’s Party!

      31 years later both law and equity lie in tatters – shredded beyond recognition by former bank-lawyers and solicitors manipulating language for fun and profit.

      You can’t argue with batsh*t-crazy.

      Here is the short/condensed version: [renamed: What happened to the $10 trillion?]

      Here is the medium-length version:

      But here is the “curve-ball” and remedy that they probably won’t see coming:

  7. Tim says:

    Sorcerers, voodoo, black magic…and they pass themselves off as the epitomy of “science”. “Heroes”.

    “Sorcery, voodoo, black magic”? It’s just about mind-manipulation and exploitation that steals life/energy. Con-artists and thieves, murderers. They are displaying the epitomy of inversion, oxymoronism, and misnomerism.

    The kill and maim with their “care and concern”, and their “safety”. Their existence and expressions can cause nausea and an internal anger that is beyond HUGE…an anger enough to engulf this whole world with a spontaneous combustion if expressed.

  8. Rick in Phoenix says:

    Good work from Jon, thanks again. Here’s the problem: We seem to be banging our heads on the same wall for months and going nowhere. The PWTB don’t care that the virus doesn’t exist. What matters is perception– of the low-information masses. And obedience to the jab-for-job corporations who are oblivious to the truth about the non-existence of the virus. So we need to try other approaches. Jeff Rense and just followed up on the exemptions from vaccination which yields a possible body-blow to the covid-vax-genocide-operation: Shocking telltale exemptions from vax for special categories of people. Here is the PDF…

    It’s very difficult for me or likely anyone to maintain a healthy level of rational-rage because it only leads to burn-out. I’ve been treading water in this regard because the whole thing is just so overwhelming and impossible to respond to while, at the same time, maintaining peace-of-mind and stability in the face of outrageous situations. In the case of the Rense-expansion on what I originally heard were vax-exemptions for Congress, then the USPS with USPS reversal, then the latest amping-up of forced-vax on our military, it seems it might be time to rev-up-my-rage just a little bit… and pound-it-into-the-minds-of-everyone-I-can…. because it just might alert the mask-wearing test-taking vax-accepting masses that they’re being played for fools.

    This approach is new for Oct. 7 and I imagine that if we campaign on this single point relentless on a trial basis for the month of October 2021, we just might be able to shut their entire covid-vax-crap-attack down for good, gain traction on lawsuits, get back to work, repair the supply chain, and fix everything else. It’s a point-of-reference that might live-in-infamy. On the other hand, I would prepare for it NOT working to influence anyone as the covid-juggernaut continues to wipe out civilization.

  9. mmoreilly says:

    Jon, may I suggest a GoFundMe is set up to raise $2M to go to the first accredited lab that isolates/purifies the “virus” under protocols established by Christine Massey, her colleagues and non affiliated experts who cannot argue with the clearly outlined isolation/purification process.

    Keep the GFM going, increasing the prize to $5M and beyond, way beyond, while using reliable outlets to get the word out in a major way until the “virus” is isolated undisputed. Sensationalize the “no winners yet” aspect. Just like the big national lottery prizes grow exponentially with no winners, the world takes notice in a huge curious way and soon realize that

    1. the prize money is becoming massive with no winners and

    2. there never will be a winner

    Let’s see how the whole thing pans out.


  10. ST says:

    Thank you Jon. For the past twenty months, you have given clear insight into this whole plandemic mess. Outstanding work by Christine Massey.

  11. Helena says:

    Great insterview! Thank you for sharing!

    I’m curious if any of these “so-called” virologists have ever woken up to the reality that their profession has been a sham? I watched a heated interview with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Andrew Kaufman that just went round and round, with Dr. Kaufman trying to explain the isolation process to Dr. Mikovits and she just wasn’t getting it.
    What is the disconnect, and are there any virologists that do get it?

  12. Mika says:

    Sounds like Christine has been following doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey. Good for her!

  13. Northern Tracey says:

    This FOI request thing was originally started by Lanka pre-measles virus court case with a website called Klein klein aktion. Sadly it was all in German, then it seemed to disappear and now it is censored in many countries. James McKumiskey then did the first FOI request in Ireland for the viruses in several vaccines given routinely there. They could not provide any proof of isolation of any of the viruses he requested. This is not just about covid, it’s about the whole of virology and the vaccine industry.

  14. Tapestry says:

    They won’t isolate the virus the reason that they know what it is, and so do we. We lived in Asia for ten years and knew this illness as trankaso. Exactly the same symptoms as COVID. No one died. It was horrible and stressful including mental effects. The Chinese simply rebranded trankaso and sold it to Gates for £100 million. Easy money.

  15. Marc Schoen says:

    This article causes me to ask if you are aware of Dr. Robert Fleming? He claims he has isolated the virus and shows pictures of it. His site is – Fleming

    • Lawrence Beck says:

      Dr. Fleming stated that “many labs have isolated the virus… but not by using Koch’s Postulates” on the Highwire program when he first appeared on it. I don’t recall if it was late last year or early this year.

      Are his photos taken of a purified virus absent vero or bovine cell exposure? If so, he is the only doctor on the planet to make such claims. And if he was successful in purifying and photographing the virus why is it that other labs worldwide haven’t been able replicate this using his procedure?

      He is also amongst those doctors who make claims of “highly infectious variants” that Dr McCullough, Geert Van Den Bossche and others speak of.

      These are doctors who are sold on germ theory and Rockeffeller/petroleum-based medicine. It’s all they know as they haven’t taken the time to investigate terrain theory. As long as these “highly transmissible variants” are promoted there will be an excuse for boosters that are designed to further destroy one’s immune system under the false pretext of “protection.”.

    • Tony Redondo says:

      Exactly Marc…and Dr Richard Fleming’s evidence is up before the International Criminal Court right now (Case No 141/21). Not only is it isolated but he gives you a breakdown of it to the last molecule and a breakdown on those who manufactured it

      Here’s your isolated virus […] Keep in mind, conspiracy theories do not make it to the ICC.

  16. Paul says:

    In Ancient Times, it was said:

    “The greatest trick The Devil played, was convincing everyone He didn’t exist.”

    I guess, in modern daze,
    ya could reverse that.

    Excellent article/interview,
    by Christine/you.

    • Julian says:

      I have only today been pondering the comparison between the religious belief that demonic spirits can invade a person and possess them, and this idea there are viruses floating about that can do the same. In both cases it suits the amalgamated powers of Church and State, and in our era ‘Science’ and State.

      Could these ‘demons’ be proven to exist?

      No, not really, apart from the ‘abnormal’ and non-conformist behaviour of those judged to be possessed, and same seems to be so now.

      NO one can prove the actual reality of this ‘deadly’ virus. A virus that knows when to attack a person ONLY when they stand up, example in a restaurant, rather than sitting down, hence people only being allowed to unmask when sat. Or when a lying politician walks up to the podium, and microphone and ritualistically is seen to remove mask for camera. That virus KNOWS then to leave the LIAR alone!!

      ALL insanity. STILL in the Middle Ages.

      Actually I more and more feel closer to the witch-burning times since 2020/21 because a lot of that was the attack on natural folk healers, usually old women, and especially midwives, not sanctioned by the Church, and look now the savage fuss against even doctors who want to use other remedies OTHER than poison injections to treat ‘Covid 19’??

      So what has really changed?

  17. Rick Francis says:

    Back in December 2018, before COVID, this article ( explained the development of GLUE (Genes Linked by Underlying Evolution). It’s “a data-centric bioinformatics environment for building such resources” and the “GLUE core data schema organises sequence data along evolutionary lines, capturing not only nucleotide data but associated items such as alignments, genotype definitions, genome annotations and motifs. Its flexible design emphasises applicability to different viruses and to diverse needs within research, clinical or public health contexts.”
    So yes, the person interviewed in your link is unaware, but the development of this tool for tracking viral genomes preceded COVID-19 by more than a year.

    Fast-forward to April 2021, and a non-profit organization called GISAID (Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data) is hosting a repository of more than one million SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from around the world. Story here:

    You don’t need a FOIA request to find out what is known about the virus and how was it learned. You definitely are wasting time by submitting FOIA requests to public health officials, who are not the ones developing, researching, publishing on this stuff. Just look at the peer-reviewed scientific papers and follow the citations.

    • Jimmy says:

      Keep drinking the koolaid and preparing for your tenth booster.

    • A repository of fraudulent “genomes” fabricated out of zillions of sequences detected in the RNA soup extracted from a patient sample or from a cell culture is not helpful, Rick.

      Cite a study where anyone on the planet has purified the theoretical virus? And then extracted the genetic material from THAT?

      I’d think that such highly prized and sought-after study would be at your fingertips if you actually knew of one. There is a 1.5 million Euro reward for it, after all:

    • Farmer Pete says:

      Why would you have to “build” anything with fancy speculative computer models if you could actually pull the alleged particle out and observe it doing anything you assume it does?

      “Its flexible design emphasises applicability to different viruses”… what does that even mean? Either you have the original thing you say you do, or you don’t. Building sequence models of things you don’t have from things you never had in the first place does not make a thing you have now.

      All you’ve pointed out is that there are bunch of other sorcerers playing more laboratory beg the question games of circular reasoning and faith-based germ accusations. You can dress it up with all the fancy Psyence terminology you want…. it’s still biologically meaningless.

      I wonder what would happen if you assigned (with the same amount of re$ource$) all these gene and germ hunters the task of actually trying to get to the root cause of an individual’s DISease. Society would be much more evolved.

  18. Roundball Shaman says:

    “Meaning: There are no records showing the virus has been isolated; there are no records showing the virus exists.”

    It’s been right in front of our faces, time and time again these days that…


    Their Narrative. The central lie that the entire massive house of cards is built upon. Nothing resembling the truth – nor anything else whatsoever – can expose or threaten The Central Lie that today now entire new industries and social behaviors and mores and edicts and orders and papal proclamations have been erected to.

    ‘The Virus’ will never go away because IT CAN’T GO AWAY. There’s too much riding on it. There’s too much at stake. There’s too much effing MONEY to be made. There’s too much POWER to be grabbed in the hands of those least qualified dimwits to wield it at stake to be lost. It is a boon beyond belief to the Dark Sorcerers that just keeps on giving.

    In old Biblical Times, they erected a Golden Calf to worship.

    In the 21st Century modernized World, they have erected a GOLDEN LIE to worship. And worship it we have. And the faith continues to grow.

    Bow down to The Virus. Say your words of praise to The Virus. Worship The Virus. Thank The Virus. Pray to The Virus. Spread the Gospel of The Virus.

    Now and forevermore.

    And there is no Moses coming around this time to put things right.

  19. NH Shore says:

    Viruses are part of a vital system of spreading and sharing genetic particles amongst living organisms. This comes with advantages of helping the organism continue to adapt its genetic system and it comes with disadvantages as there can be errors and incompatiability that creates vulnerability to illness.

    The reason why they cannot purify the virus is because the virus has integrated itself into our cells so it no longer produces a whole virus. In the earliest stages of existence, yes you can purify and isolate the virus but by the time most researchers discover the virus it has already moved into the next stage.

    What is being called Covid-19 is a syndrome. It is not a direct infection of Sars-Cov-2 but a multitude of illnesses caused by Sars-Cov-2 viruses changing our cells and creating vulnerabilities to more severe illnesses at a later point. It could be immediately after an initial Sars-Cov-2 infection or months later. Sometimes your body fixes it without you knowing or you get sick.

    The confusion over isolation was caused by the conflating and combining of many aspects of viruses. Currently used methods of isolation is meant for viruses that have mixed into the body. Using computer modeling for full genomic sequence is meant to piece together a map to better understand the virus at a later stage.

    These methods are not meant to be interpreted as evidence of a full Sars-Cov-2 genome currently being spread. If that were the case then we would be purify an abundance of whole virus particles and sequence them without ever needing to fill in any blanks. At this point it is highly likely Sars-Cov-2 viruses have completely spread out as there are no isolates and it likely happened before 2020.

    What could be spreading that is causing similar illness amongst numerous groups of people are triggers to the Sars-Cov-2 mixed into us. These triggers could be anything from certain bacteria, viral fragments, toxins, EMF, radiation.

    Ultimately Sars-Cov-2 virus is nothing special. There are endless amounts of viruses that can change our body and create new vulnerabilities to illness. Our cells and immune system can adapt and fix it so long as you help that process and treat the body well.

    • Those are wild, inconsistent claims backed up by zero evidence.

      There is zero confusion in Jon’s article. A theoretical virus that is said to multiply and spread within our bodies, and from person to person, would need to leave one cell before entering another. And if the imaginary “it” existed and could do that, “it” could also be found and purified from many, many convid patients. Which has never been done, by anyone, anywhere on the planet.

      And of course purification is only an initial step in identifying an alleged new thing and showing that it actually spreads disease.

      In other words, there is zero science behind convid.

      Some people are just desperate to keep the focus on imaginary viruses.

  20. A NoMoreFakeNews reader writes:


    I love your work. But an important contradition remains.

    Please address your conclusion ”no virus exists” with David Martin’s revelations that over 4000 patents have been filed in the last 20 years for Sars-Cov-2.

    Both approaches suggests deep fraud, but they appear to be incompatible.

    Maybe the contradiction can be resolved — that [the] gain of function genetic manipulations [that] are being performed (inducing pneumonia-like symptoms) cannot be “isolated,” too small, too tiny, — but, can still be modified.

    • Dr. Martin has never said that 4000 patents for any virus have been filed. He talks of patents related to alleged “viruses” and “vaccines”, and the 1 bogus “SARS virus” patent that, as he points out, contains zero causal data. That patent also describes and cites the typical monkey cell nonsense version of “virus isolation” to back up their false claim that a virus had been identified as the cause of “SARS”.

      Perhaps this is why Dr. Martin stated at the outset of his dossier: “Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and
      scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.”

      Read his dossier:

  21. Rico Debiase says:

    This Fauci panel at The MILKEN (Junk-Bond King) Institute back in October of 2019 brings even more context & evidence not just to the premeditated nature of it all, but also the total indifference to anything outside of their goals(the HIV scare campaign is cited numerous times throughout):

  22. Roundball Shaman says:

    Whether or not ‘The Virus’ exists as presented by State Media in their narrative is almost immaterial. The (desired) EFFECT of this is what is most important. Small variations of cold viruses (and weaponized ones) are always going to exist in nature (and in conjured-up forms in dark labs). This is a given.

    The end result of all this activity is more important. It is the society-wide weaponization of using ANY virus real or imagined (or just threat of a virus real or imagined) to demolish, steamroll, destroy, gaslight, and re-order the Planet in a form that better benefits The Right People against the rest of humanity that is the holy grail of all this.

    And we have seen They have been wildly successful in this Planet-wide psy op. And the victims stand and cheer all this from the sidelines with their captured minds and punctured limbs.

    • Prove any “virus” exists?

      Good luck, because the bogus methods used in convid are not new, they are the norm in virology. That’s why CDC has zero records of any “coronavirus” having been purified, by anyone ever.

      This matters greatly, because once people realize that virology is not a science and zero “viruses” have been shown to exist, the entire narrative falls apart and they realize there is zero justification for any “measures” or any “vaccines” alleged to protect against any “virus”, etc.

      • DeSelby says:

        This paper would suggest it is possible to isolate viruses. I found it looking up ‘calesivirus’ the rabbit under my house is apparently dying from. How do you explain the succesful introduction of calesi to control rabbits in Australia if it hasn’t been identified?

        Binn, L.N., Norby, E.A., Marchwicki, R.H. et al. Canine caliciviruses of four serotypes from military and research dogs recovered in 1963−1978 belong to two phylogenetic clades in the Vesivirus genus. Virol J 15, 39 (2018).

        I’m not arguing against your case, in fact, if CV hasnt been isolated yet the procedure is well known, it supports your case.

  23. dnomsed says:

    Thank you, Jon. Excellent article.

    It appears that no amount of scientific enquiry or reasoning halts the mass rollout of these toxic injected liquids. The plan seems to buy time while continuing the rollout until a point of hard resistance and unstoppable force is met.

    At such point the vaccine war on humanity will halt, only to be replaced by seemingly less obvious gene-altering medications.

    The intent seems to be a combination of gene/DNA alteration (for survivors), and mass death (for the ‘weak’). This is a genetic selection process, combined with mass human sacrifice. Practiced from embryo inception, through to post-birth injections.

    There appears to be a clear strategy at work that has nothing to do with health improvement, or disease prevention/eradication.

    Countries roll out liquids with waning effects that decay behind the rollouts, such that no overall societal effect could ever be developed. A case in point is a country in SE Asia planning to roll out 50% during 2021,up to 70% by end 2022 using a brew of global ‘free’ throwaways – covax. All using ‘vaccines’ with low efficacies, that wane months after each rollout front passes. This is all about an act of compliance and integration into the WHO vaccine/ID register. Banks and other services cannot be accessed by the Untermensch. Similar anecdotal tales emerge around the region.

    At the same time, the capital city has endured continuous lockdown since early May 2020, with over 37% in red-zones of high covid-19. This city has almost 100% first jab, and nearly 80% second jab. Fearful citizens hide. The toxic liquids do not work yet the focus is on speeding up more jabs – pregnant women, 17+ young adults, now 12-17 kids.

    Essentially the populations of these poor nations are being sold to the WHO/IMF/World Bank as lab specimens, in order to receive external funding for the governing class – ostensibly in the name of ‘humanitarian assistance’. These governing classes have raped and asset-stripped until society has literally been left with nothing.

    Cv19 positives are placed in quarantine holding centres, until pcr-negative – whatever that means in the time of year of normal seasonal flu/colds. Sane people hide away in order to not be caught in the mess. Death rates from cv19 are a rounding error when compared to annual average pneumonia and dengue fever deaths. The WHO assists to prepare regional propaganda messages.

    A mess indeed.

  24. Rick Francis says:

    The process by which the virus variants are sequenced may seem like magic, but it isn’t. It’s happening every day. In the scientific press you can learn about it pretty easily. Try it! Here’s a sample explaining what is known and what is still being explored.

    The whole FOIA approach is just BS, and is based on uninformed questions going to the wrong people.

    • dnomsed says:

      Have you heard of Koch’s postulates, Rick Francis?

      This requires an isolate of the disease-causing agent to begin the process of linking cause to effect.

      An in-silicon computer-generated sequence is a virtual figment.

    • Lol, fabricating “genomes” out of zillions of sequences detected in the RNA soup extracted from a patient sample or from a cell culture (never from a purified, alleged “virus”) does not “seem like magic”. It is blatant fraud.

      And nice try, but many of our requests have gone to institutions that claimed to have “isolated” the theoretical virus, and they have zero records:

      -VIDO-InterVac – U of Saskatchewan
      – U of Toronto
      – McMaster U
      – Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto
      – Sunnybrook HSC Toronto
      – CDC
      – India’s ICMR
      – NZ’s U of Otago
      – Australia’s Peter Doherty Institute
      – Italy’s National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani

      It’s all right here, on the public record:

  25. Eluard says:

    You know they’re using this “debate” against us. Virus/no virus. Divide/conquer.

    There’s a virus of the mind, that’s for sure. And that does affect physical health, BIG TIME.

    Still, it’s important. Jon’s been on this since freakin’ January 2020. But we need to stay united, even with those who can’t see the forest.

  26. Ronald says:

    “[…] cannot be “isolated,” too small, too tiny, — but, can still be modified.”

    If the target is not clear, even wave/particle technology cannot effect changes. It would go at random, not knowing what it is looking for!

    So, what are you saying?!

    We are scientists, and we know that unless one finds a method to hold a photon in a force field, one cannot work with it.
    Imagine the virus as the photon. If the “virologists” cannot hold the virus, how do they effect so many operations on its genetic material?!

    So, what gain-of-function is anyone talking about?!

    Our specialties comprise Quantum Physics, Chemistry, Nanotechnology, Systems Science, Neural Networks, Robotics and AI, etc.

    We know of what we speak.

    An “engineered” virus is tantamount to a nanorobot, but the description of a “virus” precludes the existence of such robot!

    The functionality of any system has been proven ALWAYS to be dependent on several critical classes of components.

    A nanorobot is designed with very limited scope and abilities.

    If those are to be enhanced, the robot needs added abilities which must be sustained from the source. The source must have knowledge of the robot’s activities at all times and all places, given input for the next operations.

    If the robot itself were to possess those abilities and energy, its size would be beyond “nano”!!

    We know it’s difficult to understand, but one needs to realize that most “scientists” are fraudulent.

    Their living depends on the lies they spew, so that more grants come their way.

    The lies of “virus” are more than 100 years old, and the first to make serious money from that were chemical dyes companies. How much more to be made subsequently!!

    Everyone should read Stefan Lanka’s work.

    He really demolishes the notion of virus and the execrable character of the “virologists”.


    The patents on “viruses” are INVENTIONS. The text of the patent states that much!

    And the invention belongs to the US government:

    Excerpt from
    Patent 7,220,852 B1
    May 22, 2007



    […] patent 7,776,521 August 17, 2010


  27. Diane Di says:

    This is the biggest case in the world right now. Not only are the People of South Africa seeking a ruling to hold their President and Parliament liable for the damages inflected by the Globalist’s Covid-Crime Against Humanity, but they are also seeking a ruling that will liquidate their Central Bank in order to pay damages suffered by the People.

    WATCH VIDEO: Mention of Christine Massey around the 6:15 minute mark. The South African lawyer mentions Christine Massey’s FOI’s that made it as part of their case to take down the corrupt South African govt

  28. CK says:

    Cowan presents more evidence viruses don’t exist (based on new experiments by Lanka):

  29. Julian says:

    This is VERY interesting also, and adds the question about the dreaded and dreadful role of 5G.

    Also keep in mind all the info about the role of graphene oxide said by some researchers to be in the vials, and important for those who want this massive roll out of 5G technology, and ‘smart’ cities.


  30. Joe Rizoli says:

    The Real COVID

    This came from the Epoch Times, an article on indoor air pollution by Joseph Mercola, Sept 29, 2021..pp C4

    The point I am trying to make and not Mercola..look at all the health risk he mentions for just bad air…. Notice what he says about what we can “catch” from bad air….


  31. Fabian Castro says:

    To finish taking all of this ‘down’, why aren’t there ‘demands’ to the laboratories that sell vaccines to show proof of the purified virus?

  32. Rick in Phoenix says:

    If the sars-cov2 virus does not exist and, in general, viruses don’t exist but exosomes do, then we could say that we’ve isolated exosomes which have been mistaken for viruses. Images of each with labels…

    Andrew Kaufman pointed this out early in the scamdemic. To say that “the virus has not been isolated” would be to say “the exosome has not been isolated”. I’m not sure that that’s true. I’ll have to “circle back” to when I first found Kaufman, find some of the attempts to debunk his theory, then reconsider.

    All along, maybe we should have been saying the virus doesn’t exist as such, and is better understood as an exosome consistent with terrain rather than germ theory.

    Another big problem with claiming the virus doesn’t exist is that bacteria and fungus, parasites and other microorganisms DO exist. I don’t think I’ve seen a good presentation on why bacteria can be real and alive and infectious whereas virus can’t. It’s as if there are several categories of microorganisms but one of them is an imposter: The virus. It’s claiming to be what is, in fact, the exosome. We HAVE isolated exosomes and we CAN “make” them in the body and in a test tube.

    • DeSelby says:

      I was looking at the paper describing the new Novovax jab dated Sept 3 2021 at and came across this line

      “Virologic confirmation was performed by means of polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay at the U.K. Department of Health and Social Care laboratories with the TaqPath system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were not available for sequencing, and virus-strain characterization was based on PCR data alone.”

      I spent two days going through 300 scientific journals for the last two years, no-one has claimed to isolate the virus.

      If it hasn’t been isolated there can be no causal link to the disease, apparently they made up a sequence that looks plausible.

  33. lamberth says:

    Great piece Jon, thank you.

    As said before, proving the falsehood of the whole Germ Theory is our only long-term defense in all this. We’ve been in it for well over 100 years. It’s time to end it, once and for all.

    My meme:

    Germ/Virus Theory = Business Model
    Terrain Theory = Health Model

  34. Barefoot says:

    Could you please name a virus that was isolated in a fashion that does actually meet these criteria that you have set? Genuinely curious.

  35. Arby says:

    This puzzles me: “The text has varied somewhat over time. For example, in the beginning I used the word “isolation”. But since that term gets abused so badly by virologists, I now stick to “purification”.”

    I’ve noticed that when virologists ‘and’ those like Andrew Kaufman use the word ‘purification’, in relation to finding viruses, they actually mean ‘isolation’. They’ve got us playing their obfuscation game. When I purify water, for example, I take junk ‘out’ of it. But when Andrew Kaufman talks about purification of a microorganism, he means removing it from its junky environment. That’s isolation. Sorry, but it just is.

    I absolutely would stick with plain English and clear communication here. I absolutely would not refer to purification. But to be fair, If we use the word isolation without qualification, then, yes, they are going to use their wonky definition. If that’s Christine’s reason, then I agree. Although why can’t she use the word ‘isolation’ and qualify it at the same time so that there’s no confusion?

  36. Will says:

    And yet the Chief Medical Officer in England (idiot in charge of Covid) is determined to go ahead with flouridation over here.

    He has dismissed concerns.

    The matter is going largely unreported.

    Where can I find more more info about the Canadian situation?

  37. David Richard says:

    Is Covid really
    a NO play?

    That would be
    a real no-no.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *