Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists

by Jon Rappoport

April 21, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”

But what if the virus doesn’t exist?

People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.

“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”

I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [1], and he provided his analysis in detail.

I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [2].

First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.

The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.

They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. THAT’S THEIR KEY “EVIDENCE.” This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.

There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.

Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus” they never isolated. “We didn’t find it, we don’t know anything about it, but we sequenced it.”

Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:

STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”

KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”

STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”

KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”

STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”

KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”

STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”

KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”

KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [3]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”

STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”

STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”

KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”

STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”

KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”

—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—

My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.

Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.

And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?

Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [4]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?

The answer is no.


[1] https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/

[2] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

[3] https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

126 comments on “Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists

  1. Tim says:

    Imagine all the time, energy, and money spent on this so-called “science”. And they(most) think they’re so “rational” and “reasonable” and doing work for the betterment of humanity. And in actuality they’re just dressing up old superstitions and weird religious ideas with different clothes and terms and formulas that those “heathen” and “unwashed massess”, the “uninitiated”, outside the inner sanctum of the holy “laboratory” cannot understand “because they aren’t intelligent enough” to understand such high and mighty things…
    When…it’s all nonsense. Hogwash. Hocus-pocus. Voodoo.

    All based from a denial of The Truth; whereby anything else is a meaningless, miscreative NOTHING. Fantasy.

  2. Need a ladder says:

    Dr. Andrew Kaufman should replace Tony Fraudci for our better more exceptional health.

  3. Anne Beckett says:

    I appreciate that you found, and promoted, Andy Kaufman. I know what conversation this was based on, and I’m bothered that anyone who hears Dr Kaufman cannot comprehend they never isolated ANY virus; ANY VIRUS.

    I attended a medical (as if) meeting the other day. A nurse (as if) said to me, “I know you don’t believe in it.” I was tempted to say, “in what?!” But, I sneered. instead.

    The thing that bothers me, most, would be the medical establishment. Prior to this mess (and not long prior), I realised my own doctors knew nothing, as they would google my symptoms, and then google how to handle them (and I generally balked.) I did say, “I could have done that from home.” And, I have told them how to actually manage my symptoms, knowing my body, and being mostly right. The problem, as I saw it, was that doctors are googling a one-cure-fits all type of scenario, and I know my body…

    I have finally realised that today’s, “medicine”, relies on the Hegalian Dialectic of (create) problem, (guage) reaction, and (google) solution. I’m no longer interested in their snake-oil.

    Thanks, again, Jon Rappaport. Even if I don’t always say anything, I do truly enjoy your articles.

    • Mawa says:

      Hence *Dr Joel Wallach’s* book, “Dead Doctors Don’t Lie!”

      • kathleen kahl says:

        I love that Book. It was my red pill and I never looked back. I had asthma and allergies and joint issues coming on. All gone with no allopathic drugs. And 20 years later the doctors are still dying young.

      • Cathy Vallecorsa says:

        B I N G O !

      • Andrew R McKim says:

        I have a couple hundred cassette tapes of Dr. Wallach’s classic lecture “Dead Doctors Don’t Lie,” if anybody is interested, lol.

    • Eluard says:

      Doctors Googling your symptoms!!

      That says it all right there. True Medical work is about Love and I don’t see that most doctors love their work. They love the prestige, the money, the perks, the ego massage. Anyway it’s PAs who do most medical work nowadays. They’re like “limbo doctors.”

      As a kid I had a doctor who would see us for a half hour. He KNEW our family.

      Now doctors know Google. Healing is not their art. Matching a drug to a symptom is their methodology.

    • Toni says:

      I second your comment, all of it! ????

    • Joseph Foley says:

      Having watched several videos by Dr. Kaufmann, it seems that he would agree with you that no virus has ever been isolated. He doesn’t accept the germ theory.

  4. Hugh says:

    Jon I was hoping you might read and possibly comment on this essay. It’s rather long but I feel worthy of additional eyes.

    I look forward to any comments you may have to either endorse or refute its content.

    Thank you…


    • Epicurious says:

      Had to laugh as he claims he is being neutral whilst posting ad-hominem slurs on Kauffman. One protestor suggests he has links to big pharma. I wonder how her has the time to post such a lengthy diatribe which would have taken a good week minimum of time to complete. Where is he getting his influence/direction/information from?

      • Zach says:

        I agree with what you said. Adhominem is a logical fallacy. You cannot invalidate a position by attacking the character of the person holding it. But some people point out that doctors like Kaufmann and Cowan, while respectable in their fields, don’t hold the needed credentials in virooogy. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to make the Appeal to authority fallacy here, but credentials do count and I was wondering how one can respond to this. Also, are there well-known virologists who corroborate the non-existence of the virus? Thanks

        • NC says:

          Check out Stefan Lanka

        • David Lamson says:

          The criticisms Dr. Kaufman makes of the scientific experiments, lack of isolation, lack of controls, etc., are universal scientific method criteria, and are not specific to any one discipline. Medical doctors are particularly weak on the scientific method as that is not part of their medical school training- in Dr. Kaufman’s case, he spent several years working in a laboratory setting which is where he gained his understanding.

    • Alan says:

      Just from reading his summary, it is obvious that his narrative is false, putting words in Kaufman’s mouth, and beating upon dead arguments Kaufman already refuted.

      For example, Kaufman and co. never denied the existence of bacteria, but rather questioned their pathogenicity. Kaufman’s main point us that there is no valid proof of the vurus’s existence; to challenge them to provide proof that the virus does *not* exist is not answering the point, and illogical and stupid.

    • Plam says:

      Viruses do exist but they are made inside the body to act like solvents of toxins which are too much for bacteria to handle.

      Jeff Green who used to comment here has published the info here:


      • Myles says:

        Yes ‘something’ exists – but to call them ‘viruses’ is incorrect.
        Virus means: poisonous substance.
        If created within the body as described above, they certainly are not poison. Nor are they transferable or ‘contagious’

      • Arby says:

        Well, If we’re going to use language to communicate and not hinder understanding, then we have to agree on definitions. The word ‘virus’ means ‘toxin’. What you described isn’t a toxin. You described something beneficial. Let’s call that an ‘exosome’.

    • deep says:

      Lol, he actually cites wikipedia as one of his sources.

      Nor does he dissect any of the actual papers to verify Kauffman’s statements.

      He hangs on the RE-defining of ‘Koch’s postulate’ as formulated in the 20th century because of the ABJECT FAILURE to prove viral pathogencity via the original formula.

      He makes tons of a-priori claims in this article that are in fact, under dispute. He avoids addressing them and continues on pretending these are ‘settled facts’ simply because they’ve been repeated ad nauseum.

      The entire point of this debate is examination of the original source material to verify proper adhesion to the scientific method.

      If an experiment doesn’t even have valid controls from the beginning to verify that their prerequisite ‘solutions’ (antiobiotic and chemical soups) aren’t a contributing factor to the outcome of the experiment, it isn’t a valid experiment.

      Whoever wrote this isn’t a scientist. Let alone a critical thinker.

      • Mister Scott says:

        His name is Clint Richardson. He promotes Jehova Witness doctrine, masonic and mainstream narratives. His typical method of writing is to spin word salads.

  5. JayBee says:

    The Irish government have also just confirmed that they have no info at all about that isolation having taken place.https://tapnewswire.com/2021/04/breaking-irish-government-admits-covid-19-is-a-fake-hoax-scam-which-does-not-even-exist/


    I wrote to Battini to ask about one statement in this comment, placed in bold. This applies to all claims of isolation and purification.

    “There in Toronto they did not isolate and purify anything; no purified concentrate of natural and actual intact viral virion from human host. They only have BALF [bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a patient] supernatant [skimmed liquid] put in cell culture with animal cells, usually VeroE6 et similia, immortalized (pure poison and viral enrichers) to be redistributed to other laboratories. Then they ‘crumbled’ the RNA in the BALF in a broth of RNA of all types, and they sequenced it in RT-q-PCR…No true viral ‘purified isolate’. That is why they will never answer you.”

    which RNA is crumbled into the broth?

    Davide sent Jan 4 2021 at 8:15 PM

    Here are two ways to get patient sample.

    1) IMPURE sample from BALF/SWAB/STOOL/histological/fluid directly from the patient, the Host.

    2) Same IMPURE thing as point 1) but in addition then, the sample also ends up in an IMPURE cell culture (almost always cultures in monkey kidney aka VeroE6) to be amplified i.e. multiplied in culture to have the presumed viral sample in any quantity, for tests, PCR and store stock and for research and sale to labs in dedicated sites like BEI.

    Both samples are still a swill of “particles” and intact human genetic material, cells, virions and bacteria, EVs and exosomes from the Host, and so much more, (and even more came from “transfection” during replication in culture when the Host sample is cultured).

    They are always IMPURE, and never isolated and purified either from the human Host directly or from the supernatant after the culture.

    These two types of IMPURE samples are transformed into RNA strands (double or single strands of gene nucleotides from DNA or RNA).

    RNA lysates are actually crumbled RNA strands; they are cleaned/uncombed, dissolved and physiochemically filtered from their contents, i.e. cells, viruses, exosomes, etc.; all cellular and protective parts of the particles, debris, bacteria, fungi, cell bodies, and capsids and spikes around viruses present in the Host or culture supernatant sample are destroyed and dissolved, leaving only the RNA strands (whole or randomly broken up during processing).

    It is called RNA purification or RNA purified, (which has nothing to do with purifying pathogen X) so now we have the RNA strands of ALL, repeat, ALL, the DNA (splitted in RNAs) and the RNA of what the IMPURE sample contained.

    Now we have the crumbling of RNA strands ( or only the double strand DNA if it is PCR ) that will end up in an RT-qPCR to tell us what this test has been prepared and calibrated to tell us about these strands in the sample; or more accurately about the nucleic acid series and the genes that these RNA strands express and contain.

    If we are talking about molecular testing we generally stop there.

    Otherwise from this “product” of this RT-PCR or PCR we continue and proceed to the various steps of NGS genomic sequencing.

    Here I stop, the whole sequencing part starts and it is boring stuff.

  7. Éva LaRoche says:

    This has been, since Rockefeller commandeered allopathic sickcare, and always will be the faith-based science way of doing research for the express purpose of using pharmaceutical toxic potions/pills as medicine to keep people sick all the time and eventually dying sooner. They are doing it for profit, for control, for experimentation and ultimately massive depopulation of the peoples across the earth. May the creator protect us from the insanity of it all! Love, light and peace is ours ❤️????☮️

    • Tim_2A says:


      The ancient Germanic DEATH-RUNE, in the purple circle, is only a “peace” sign if one acknowledges that eventual death is the result of an absence of resistance. Of course, that equals “peace” to the global controllers.

      Peter requested upside-down crucifixion, as he declared his unworthiness for anything the Lord went through, so the design of that rune is understandable.

      What was once KNOWN AS a marker meaning DEATH is now a so-called “peace” sign.

      • Tim_2A says:

        Purple square, my error.

      • Carolita from Oklahoma says:

        Thank you for pointing that out The only true peace is found in trusting the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ. I read all about the origins of the “peace” symbol years ago and it’s fascinating.

      • Arby says:

        Jesus Christ was ‘not’ crucified. He was impaled. Where did you get that info about Peter’s request? Crucifixion of Jesus Christ is as made-up as Sars CoV 2 and comes from people just as uninterested in truth as the hoaxsters behind covid 1984.

        • Davo Jaeger says:

          Correct. Jesus is just another generation told based upon ancient knowledge that has NOTHING to do with religions as we know them. The church is the Patriarchal dominator and it enslaves the spirit and soul with false, tainted, created info with a hint of ‘truth’ from its intended meaning. The TOC is: Trinity of Control and it starts with Religions (who allows the lower levels to do their thing so long as they pay up), then the economics sectors, which controls the political sector which controls the population (via any means, but fear and disinfo are the keys).

        • Carol says:

          You don’t know that. Better to know for sure in case it is opposite of what you think. God cannot be proven or disproven, only experienced through His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ. It doesn’t help to understand the world deceptions, if being a part of it any way. Jesus is the only one who can rescue us from being a victim of the plandemic.

        • revisionist says:

          Interesting take, “impaled”. Jesus was mureder by jews for exposing them as Synagogue of Satan/edomites not Israelites and for their blood libel, but you know the drill evidence or it never happened.

    • H T says:

      The “peace” symbol is in fact a death symbol used by the Germanic tribes. A true peace symbol is called a LIFE symbol and is shown upside down from your “peace” symbol.

  8. Paul says:

    “But what
    the virus
    doesn’t exist?”


    I once spoke with a fellow who was changing careers. He had been an aggressive salesman, once proud of his talents, but now a bit guilty about his previous methodologies.

    He was thoughtful & penetrating-ly honest in his self-assessment. He vowed never to return to his previous professional methods.

    He bragged that “he could sell anything,” & that “his greatest kick was selling something, to someone, who didn’t need it.”

    Isn’t that interesting.

    Those PROs, surrounding The Sell, always seem unduly concerned, with convincing us, otherwise.

  9. Mawa says:

    This type of *lab-work* would certainly have any nursing student fail their UNKOWN-final-exam! Yet,some immoral unethical-inhumane-devils is still pushing full-speed ahead.But why?

  10. From Elsewhere says:

    Thousands of politicians, fake doctors and fake scientists should be exposed and removed from decision-making positions for all this fraud based on their greed for control, fame, power and money. The treatment they apply to others is murder, from masks to lockdowns, from Remdesivir to any vax.

  11. Lynne says:

    This is the best explanation I’ve seen about how this all came together. Not sure if this link will work.


  12. Barbara Powers says:

    Excellent writing
    . As a member of the Weston Price Foundation, I am familiar with Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Cowan and Sally Fallon. The Contagion Myth is an interesting book. For someone that has recently discovered your writing and would like to share it with others, it would be helpful for you to point to specific writing of yours that deals with the exact question: Why are people dying? You have written about many aspects of this plandemic, which is great. Perhaps your explanation has to do with the fallacy of PCR tests, false diagnosis, false death certificates, disappearance of the flu. But until we make this part more obvious and cohesive, the majority of people will still find this question unanswered. Forgive me if you have already written a specific post answering these questions, but if you haven’t, I feel it is time to use your excellent skills as a writer, to really focus or sum up your ideas about this specifically. If you have already written about this precisely, please let us know where to find it at this time. Thanks very much!

      • Arby says:

        Exactly. I was going to give a similar answer but I see that I don’t have to. It’s impossible to pick a best Jon Rappoport blog post on the covid scam, but one that I realized I would use again and again (which you note in your list), and have now bookmarked (as I have done dozens of Jon’s blog posts) is “How many people have “psychological COVID?”

    • Ursula Stouffer says:

      Since there is absolutely NO proof that more people are dying now than the usual (and we can’t conquer death), people are dying from the same things they always have!
      Which is cancer, the flu, pneumonia, accidents etc. Only now they’re all called covid.

      • cbooplay says:

        that is not a factual assumption, not based on the data they make available. Now, we can talk about the data they make available, and it’s inherent validity and/or lack there of, etc, but that is its own topic on its own. Example, in the US alone they would have had to create over 350k Death Certs out of thin air (ie people that never existed), to make this work. Based the proverbial cards they are showing, the numbers are no where near correlated with historical data sets, and it isn’t even close. Merely reshuffling the deck and recategorizing preexisting death categories cannot not explain this away.

        • TMgreen says:

          We cannot possibly have the exact or decrease in death unless there is a complete overhaul in lifestyles, resources, and the environment. The expected US death toll based on the trend before the pandemic was a 300,000 increase from 2.8 million to 3.1 million. The US reached a little over 3.1 million total deaths at the end of 2020. In the beginning of 2021, 260,000 deaths were added to the 2020 number brining the total to 3.3 million. None of the additional deaths were Covid. Using the standard procedure for all other diseases, over 90% of Covid deaths would be recategorized at heart disease, known respiratory illness, cancers. So the lockdown increased known death from known illnesses.

        • Mark W says:

          This may be true for the US, but in many other countries (I know it’s tricky for Americans to even consider the concept that other countries exist 😉 ) – the two I am most familiar with – Thailand and Australia – where lockdowns and restrictions continue to this day – late april 2021 – the death rate – published in newspapers and govt sources – from covid is NOT EVEN at the level of Flu deaths for the same period – but somehow the propaganda and fear-mongering still works. Explain that.

      • Arby says:

        That looks at the subject of ‘all-cause mortality’. Apparently, It wasn’t an unusual year for that in 2020. What will 2021 look like after they ramp up the murder by covid injections? We’ll see I guess. But I don’t have to guess at how they’ll present it. We see how they will present it. VAERS for example, acknowledges all the injection-related deaths and injuries, but not properly. They explicitly rule out any connection, causative connection, to their experimental (nazi-style) injections. It’s practically ‘All deaths everywhere at all times are covid 19 deaths’.

    • Sean says:

      Reread everything within the last month. I forget which article but it is all about how the deception is completed. It runs deep, the propaganda, the power or media, ect that Jon has very nicely explains. I forget which article but its pretty much the best summation Ive ever seen. And makes the lights really come on!

      • Sean says:

        Jon explains the pandemic as an “it.” It, meaning whatever they tell us is the, it, is the cause. Only what they tell us.

        This article I linked below, may not answer your question, “Why are people dying?” But it does support how lies being broadcasted are believed as real. People do die. Of multiple reasons. Just when there are fake pandemics, there are no other reasons than the, “it.” https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/16/the-unanimous-news-conforms/

    • Cman says:

      Ms. Powers, if you will go to the beginning of any article here, find the search box and key in “why are people dying”, your questions will be answered! I know I find myself thinking that very same thing from time to time, but I snap out of it and realise it’s just the incessant, relentless propaganda (and prior brainwashing that we’re subjected to) that causes me to even consider that there may be a virus! I’m a retired laboratory technologist (Calif. Clinical Laboratory Scientist) and found this article difficult to understand. If I found these laboratory procedures and/or instructions in any of my procedure manuals, it would be impossible to perform ANY analysis!! What Jon was quoting made zero sense to me. Did any one else find their instructions tenable? I BELIEVE THE COVID PANDEMIC IS A TOTAL HOAX!

    • Epicurious says:

      I have not done the research on the US but here is a very recent report by the British Medical Journal which includes some excellent charts:

      This report indicates that the overall deaths in the UK between 1943 and 2009 (each year individually and on average) far exceeded those for 2020. The period 2009-2019 were certainly below 2020 but as for the alleged climate emergency one has to look at the bigger picture. I can’t see any reason to believe the US is any different to the UK.

      • Lyn P says:

        The other day David Knight had a segment on his show portraying the sheer statistical fraud used in showing death increases over 20 years. Conveniently this was a graph without any context, i.e., raw, absolute numbers.

        Placed next to a graph with the death data PER 100K POPULATION, you see the reality.

        Truly depressing that much of the public would not know how to discern these two approaches to measurement.

      • Arby says:

        My problem with Lockdown Sceptics is that they actually push pro covid 1984 propaganda.

        • Davo Jaeger says:

          Lockdowns are a form of punishment and you’d be crazy to believe that I would ever allow a ‘gov’ to tell me I can’t leave my house, or visit my family, or have any pets. Lockdowns are tyrannical and serve no purpose other than control.

          Every nation is a member of the UN and the UNs Declaration of Human Rights (a few aren’t) is being broken daily by them all. It is a recognition of your RIGHTS is it NOT FN PERMISSION!

          The document even says at the beginning that unless all people know these things they cannot be used to the full extent. Meaning, the UN, and govs, won’t promote these statements… you’ll have to find them on your own; just like all the horrible laws protecting corps from damages their products cause.

    • Mos Craciun says:

      Hi Barbara !
      On top right of the page there is a window : search Jon’s blog. Put your question there ( Why are people dying ? ) and you get a list of posts dealing with it. I will start with:


      I will also suggest :


    • kathleen kahl says:

      good answers here but I would add are people dying?
      The stats from the last 5 years so a down tick in deaths for 2020.
      People die every day.
      I would say CoVid saved many from death at the hands of the number 3 cause of death in America: the medical system.

  13. Neo-Paradigm says:

    Show your vaccine passport to prove you’ve been vaccinated against a non existent virus. Next year you will need a booster shot for the non existent variant du jour.

  14. Doug says:

    So…all this sickness and death is in everyone’s head? Oh yes, that’s much more believable. You’re all insane.

    • Frankie says:

      For 1000’s of years people believed the cause of illness was because “God is angry with your sins”.

      In hindsight, it is very easy to see that real illnesses could have a fake explanation in order to control people.

      If this was 2000 years ago, would you accept a sick dying person as proof that God was angry with them?

      • Terry says:

        Where is the evidence that people believed for thousands of years that the cause of illness was because “God is angry with your sins.”

        People have been using herbs, food, fasting, essential oils and other natural derivatives for thousands of years.

        In fact, in the King James Bible in Exodus 30 (written about 1491 B.C), a detailed description of the anointing oil notes the “art of the apothecary”.

        How is it that an “art of apothecary” exists if all people believed that the cause of illness was the anger of God?

        Obviously, people had a closer contact with the natural world and created their own naturally based remedies from natural sources.

        Today, we are fed the line that toxic and foreign man-made chemicals or concoctions of dead bacteria or viruses along with toxic adjuvants (usually CNS toxins like aluminum or mercury) and toxic preservatives (like formaldehyde) are necessary to create “health”.

        The fact is that it is failing miserably, massively expensive and an model of an insane mind that believes that man-made, synthetic, foreign chemical concoctions that are completely foreign to the natural biological system can make you well.

        And the simpletons who buy that complete b.s are the propagandized true believers that call anyone who questions that insane model as being “unscientific” or backwards.

        Such complete patent nonsense. Fools accept the modern medical model and the doctors who supply the so-called “cures” are either fools or greedy and don’t really care.

    • Alvaro says:

      You have not done your research… unless you are a child or a very old person with no access to information, you have no excuse after 1 year to keep on believing all this non-sense. Swallow your pride and admit it, you believed everything the media told you like good sheeple, instead of researching and understanding what’s really going on… In Spain (as an example) the common flu has disappeared… weird right??? we have gone from 15,000 deaths a year to… 0… LITERALLY. Now it is all called “COVID”. The elite managed convince the planet that an “asymptomatic” person (a healthy person, basically) was in fact a potential sick one… unbelievable how they managed to spread fear all over the place for something that does not exist. It is the freaking FLU!!!

    • Sean says:

      I may be insane, maybe. But the virus they claim is killing everyone on TV, has never been isolated. So that means the is no basis to what precisely they are claiming. The are lying on purpose.

      So who is most insane? TV watchers or honest scientist that show it has never been isolated?

    • Epicurious says:

      I refer you to my post in response to Barbara Powers above. This is data not emotion, unlike your pathetic comment regarding people’s sanity. Perhaps you could provide an explanation as to why you think responders here are insane but please ensure you provide some rigour otherwise people will just dismiss you as vapid or you are just a troll. Come on then convince us!

    • Caroyn Gutman Dey says:

      False dichotomy. “All this sickness and death is in everyone’s head”. We aren’t saying that. Actually, the real point is that sickness and death that is REAL is being ignored and called “COVID”. Also, over treatment and mistreatment and just really bad medical practice are causing a lot of deaths (i.e. using the ventilators). It’s all about ignorance of the true causes of disease and that is willful ignorance at this point.

    • Haniel Adhar says:

      Actually, yeah, it is. It’s called “gaslighting”, and people are being conditioned to call any sickness, illness, or death “covid-related”.

    • kathleen kahl says:

      Look us the stats on the CDC website. No more deaths in 2020 than in 2019. In fact there were less in 2020. I know it is hard going down but you will be free once you swallow that red pill.

    • Arby says:

      Forgive us. We will return to the true God, tv, right away.

    • anti-doug says:

      Don’t be an idiot. It’s on TV.

    • Peter Stilla says:

      Disease exists. It just isn’t caused by a virus. Never been proven too. That’s a fact you need to wrap your head around.

  15. Phil Rodokanakis says:

    Jon, I’ve been following your writings for more than a as year now and they always bring some sanity to the cacophony of Covid propaganda and lies.

    The failure to isolate the virus brings up the following question: if they haven’t isolated the virus, what’s in the vaccines? I sure hope you can write about this in a future column.

  16. Mate says:

    Jon, your courageous service to humanity never ceases to impress.

    I received news two days ago that my uncle passed away, aged 59. He was told he had “covid”, subsequently isolated himself, and when my elderly grandparents couldn’t get a hold of him via phone, they drove out to his rural home, where he lived alone, and found him dead.

    I have happy memories of the little time I spent with my uncle during his life, and am sad for the loss to the family. But most depressing by far has been to observe and contemplate my family’s reaction.

    The impulse is to identify the tragedy of his passing, which is foremost a private matter, with the national media cover story of the last 13 months, for which blame must be assigned, and bitterness, uncertainty, and terror must be felt. He “caught” and was killed by the covid phantasm, they are convinced. And it seems unlikely when they can participate in the perceived shared sense of victimhood, when they can recite a now deeply personal war story, that they would entertain the possibility that they and their deceased family member were played by the medical industrial complex and the mass media.

    Maybe I shouldn’t be too presumptuous. I don’t live in the area and won’t be at the funeral, but perhaps they too would ask all the questions I would ask.

    All of the reading I have done on the subject of Eastern medicine and healing, and all of my own experience with eastern healers, has led me to one basic truth: we must look at the individual as a whole, at the whole picture of their health. And this has to be done in person—telemedicine, my ass.

    My uncle was overweight, rarely ate anything but TV dinners, never exercised after 35, smoked cigarettes, and suffered serious head trauma from two separate major car accidents in his 40s, before which he drank heavily. Is this necessarily a picture of a healthy person (from a biomedical perspective, or other)? How often did he come down with colds and flus? He probably dealt with pain in the years after his car accidents. What kind of medications was he taking, if any? How long was he on those medications? Dosages?

    And then the more acute questions: Was there an urgent health crisis that led to his death? If so, what was it? What were his symptoms and when did they present? When was he tested and what truly was the result? When and how many times did he speak to a doctor? Telemedicine—are you kidding? What was prescribed? Was he really just told to isolate in his home? Was no other medical advice given?

    Yes, I assume an autopsy could be requested, but why bother? The American people are attuned to their resentments, and are accustomed to easy answers. Jon summarized this beautifully when he recently revisited the film Network (1976). If there is a culprit ready available to blame, they blame it. And then everyone should be vaccinated so it doesn’t happen again. The Boomers and the generation before them dare not question the men in white coats, the pill-prescribing priesthood. Seemingly their advice is always sacrosanct, no matter the number of deaths that occur as a by-product of their negligence and ineptitude.

    This entire affair was designed to savagely exploit human vulnerability and ignorance. It’s revolting to see it in action.

    • Toni says:

      I appreciate your comment, thank you. Good points which I agree with.This has been, and will continue to be as long as we let it – a giant hoax. Also, you may find interesting:The Germ Theory (Pasteur) vs. Terrain Theory (Bechamps) which you can hear a dis ussion of on the Alfa Vedic ytube and website; and a series of interviews that have been available on Ytube, “House of Numbers” dealing with the so-called HIV/AIDS epidemic. There is also a DVD of it.

    • Caroyn Gutman Dey says:

      well said….

    • Paul says:

      “..we must look at
      the individual as a whole,
      at the whole picture
      of their health.
      And this has to be done
      in person—
      telemedicine, my ass.”

      You said it!

      But of course
      They could save their precious time,
      for a few shots
      on the golf course.

      It’s their Dream…
      to dictate to us,
      & secure.

      They are not too “into” actual healing.

      Thank you.

  17. Tim_2A says:


    To whom are you directing your remark? I’d suggest the contemplation of a reflective surface, for a partial answer.

    The ONLY CONSTANT condition of humanity is suffering, with death as its termination.

    Our refusal to accept mortality is the only reason that the ‘practice of medicine’ flourishes as it does.

    Our ignorance of God’s word allows creatures who are directed by evil to poison us physically, mentally, and spiritually, in the name of “…please, just one more hour/day/week/year…” to finish what want to do. Our love for the physical clouds our understanding of the spiritual.

    Yes, perhaps <<>> insane, in that way.

    • Tim_2A says:

      “…perhaps ‘WE ARE ALL’ insane…”

    • Lyn P says:

      Along these lines, it has been so interesting to hear many scamdemic-buster scientists, philosophers, honest docs, lawyers, etc. discuss how they are not “a religious person” but they have come to see the utter importance of the spiritual realm as the underpinning of the *Way Out of This* and that a large swath of the population doesn’t qualify.

      Not as a judgmental conclusion but it becomes clear that’s built into the bottom line.

      • Alan says:

        Well, I admit to being a religious person, and I even call the blind “faith” in germ/viral theory “the modern-day version of idolatry, with very grave consequences comparable to those suffered by idolatrous Jews as recorded in the Old Testament”.

  18. Paul says:

    Off Topic.

    3-1/2 MINUTES of WISDOM

    Kmele Foster’s thoughtful analysis & commentary.


    • Lyn P says:

      The racism in the never-ending promotion of victim-status is utterly maddening.

      As well as the hubris in those who want to promote it forever.

    • kathleen kahl says:

      Amen to that. The statistics of how many black unarmed people killed by po VS white says it all. But hey who needs statistics when you can create lies to keep said blacks under your control via the Democrat Party.

  19. Ernest Judd says:

    Something I would like to add to the discussion is
    Why, in the past (35 yrs ago) when a researcher looking to isolate genetic material, they would use high speed centrifugation in a solute gradient and pipette out the visible isolates in the gradient and analyse each one.
    I say this, because back in 1986 I had been hired as a lab assistant to help a grad student isolating Chloroplast DNA from Thuja plicata (Western Red Cedar) and we spun many samples using centrifuges at 18000 (rpm or x Gravity) and up to 120000.
    Another possibly unique approach to destroying the CoVid1984 “isolation” creative writing is to compare other Genetic material isolation techniques with the claimed C0V1984 isolation. Are there any other “isolation techniques” similar to the Covid?
    Compared to the “isolation” paper the work I did in the past was far more intensive and time consuming than this one.

    • Lyn P says:

      You might check out Dr. Stefan Lanka’s books/work. He did true isolation of an amoeba (sea anemone?) virus decades ago and has documented the distortions and fraud over time.

      • Josh says:

        yeah I saw that one as well when you deep dive into an actual photo of a virus you eventually get to that one and it was a symbiotic virus with the see an enemy that’s why it was so chill and could get its picture taken I guess

  20. Sean says:

    I seen Dr Andrew Kaufman live lay all of this out.

    Have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?

    The answer is no.

    • Toni says:

      Thank you, Sean, for this comment;I agree to it.
      Dr. Kaufman is very instructive and people can visit his website and see most of his past video presentations that he has done specifically on the problem of no-isolation and Koch’s postulates required for a true scientific process.
      If people would take the time to investigate Dr. Kaufman’s explanations on this, and review the writings of Jon Rappoport, while turning off, and keeping off, their TV, they would quickly become freed-up from their fears and capable of developing their God-given gifts of logic, rationality, reason.

  21. Anon says:

    MRNA can be transmitted from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, like HIV
    “… there is no need to vaccinate the entire population. The vaccinated people will quickly spread the weaponized prions to the unvaccinated through bodily fluids, from saliva to sexual intercourse.”

    But it’s worse than that. It looks like unvaccinated people working alongside vaccinated people can catch it. Proof? MRNA impacts a woman’s reproductive system. It’s designed to make women sterile. There are reports of pregnant women having miscarriages after they have been vaccinated. Old women well after they reached menopause are having periods. Menstruating women are getting very unusual and painful periods after the vax. OK so how does this prove the unvaxxed are catching this MRNA? Those problems are also being reported by unvaxxed women now. Here’s an infowars article on this:

    Here’s Clif High talking about unvaxxed people catching MRNA from the vaccinated. He thinks it’s caught by breathing the skin cells which the vaxxed people are shedding 24/7:

    This is not genocide. We are looking at the extinction of the human race….

  22. Pete says:

    Very Good Tim sounds like ACIM one of my favorites read it every day if you don’t know it stands
    for A Course In Miracles

  23. Benton says:

    What is this, talk of using ‘controls’ in studies or ‘isolation’ of disease cells and other nonsense. The job of everyone is to not ask questions, only go along and do as your told. Now, roll up your sleeve and one of our strangers is going to stab you with some liquid, then you are to go back to doing things that do not matter, and not ask any questions, about anything. This Rapopport is an example of not going along. You should not follow his example. You should follow us robot goverment and pharma pushers.

    Or not.


  24. Lewis says:

    Can anyone make heads or tails on this attack on Kaufman? https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2021/04/14/dr-andrew-kaufmans-viral-disinformation/

    Jon…really you should take this guy on in your next blog!

    • Caroyn Gutman Dey says:

      Kaufman has been attacked like this the entire time he has been speaking out. They always say the same types of things. They always accuse him of … um…. making money as a doctor… and other HORRIBLE things like that. lol Seriously, though, I looked into these “critics” and they are truly pathetic. Okay, I just now looked into this guy — it’s just words and sentences and “arguments” that make zero sense. REALLY pathetic. Never ever gets to the point and just likes to try to sound smart and philosophical. Never even approaches the topic at hand, really.

      • Alan says:

        Including a long discourse on the “Hegelian diabetic”, which is totally irrelevant.

        Criticizing Kaufman for failing to produce the proof that the virus does not exist, while admitting that “one cannot prove a negative”.

        Logically, this guy is a total clown.

    • Tim Esup says:

      If you watch the video in the comments you will view Kaufmann rudely drill Judy Mikovitz as if she were a misbehaving 3rd grader. She tells you that all her cohorts are dead from working exposure to viruses in the (“defense”) labs, she explains that that she expects to die as they did too, and that the shot is the “kill switch” that, in one sense, activates 40-plus years of imported pathogens via past vaccinations. Nevertheless, she attempts to explain to “Andy, with much patience, that “isolation” in common parlance does NOT, and can not, have the same nomenclature in the specialty of virology. Clint >Richardson explains this fact. Take your own career as an example. There are things and subjects in your field that you know have a common-man understanding while you are at the pub but that which also share a dual meaning once it is specified and applied to while you are in your performance, duties, and understanding of your sequestration of skills. THAT understanding comes only with collaborative job-based usage, and no one outside of your specialty will ever “get it” the way you understand it. The who, what , where, when, why, and how will be known to you in a way that the brewmaster will not be able to know. From that smallest of gaps the two of you may argue forever whether or not something is actually nothing or that the something that is nothing doesn’t exist. It is a fact that “isolation” does not meet Kaufmann’s definition, but it is sinfully wrong and pridefully unjust to inculcate Judy Mikovitz, and thereby Clint >Richardson, into Kaufmann’s common-man understanding even while he plays at being an authority, as a Medical Doctor, while his own private governing board, the American Medical Association, denies his queer application of a general term to a specific meaning.

      • Haniel Adhar says:

        This is one of the worst and least effective replies to this subject that I have seen in a long time.

        It is circular logic that makes not one lick of sense.

        Besides the fact that the typos > * really make it even harder to read.

        And I am no fan of Judy Mirkovitz. I think she has some points but much of what she says is not credible, not verifiable, and is largely speculation.

        Kaufman is 100% correct and there is no way to invalidate what he said without lying. Or, using some gaslighting tactic like what you said here, as if someone can’t “get it” unless their governing board allows them to.

        I think you need to rethink the whole package.

  25. Piksil says:

    It’s been a while since I’ve posted a comment here to Jon’s excellent posts, or some excellent comments (keep ’em both coming!), but I’ve been keeping up, if maybe a day or two behind.

    That being said, I think that this video pretty much sums up CoVID (or any other ‘virus’), as well as summing up what I’ve been able to unlearn as an allopathically trained healthcare worker in the past 13 +|- months….

    19 minutes long, well worth the time.
    “God Sent Us a Video on Viruses-April 21,2021” at TheBigVirusHoax.

    P.S.: Some other good offerings there as well.

  26. Haniel Adhar says:

    This is called “Checkmate”.

    It’s hard for anyone to refute what Kaufman is saying without lying.

    • Tim Esup says:

      I disagree with you.

      • Haniel Adhar says:

        Then call up Dr Kaufman and tell him that you disagree with him.

        There is substantially more evidence that the virus has not been isolated than just what he is saying here.

        The very fact that no one can actually find it is enough proof. Where is it? CDC doesn’t have it. Health Canada doesn’t have it. Nu Calgon doesn’t have it.

        But millions of people have it? Ok, then where is it?

  27. Rollo Tomasi says:

    So what was it that Nobel Prize winner Dr Luc Mointaignier analyzed over a year ago? He concluded that this was no naturally mutated virus, but that “molecular tools” must have been used.

    • Rollo Tomasi says:

      Sorry – Montaignier, he of HIV virus fame.

    • Alan says:

      The /in silico/ genome of the non-existent virus, of course.

      The “molecular tool” in question is indeed the computer program used to do the Next Generation Sequencing. No surprise it can construct an “artificial” genome (which does not exist in any organism or micro-organism). The same thing as the unicorns and fantasy creatures you can find in many computer game worlds.

  28. Tim_2A says:

    Regarding ‘death,’ a man went skydiving one sunny afternoon, and jumped from the plane, as he’d done dozens of times before.

    Almost immediately, he realized he’d forgotten his parachute.

    Several minutes later, he died of CoVid.

    Surprise, surprise, surprise (thanks, Gomer), people are still dying of ‘other’ things.

  29. Paul says:

    TO ALL:

    Reading all your well-written commentary, perspectives, & analysis this morning over morning coffee has been a joy!

    Who needs the NYT’s front page, above the fold.


    And Thank you!

  30. Paul says:

    And Thank You Jon
    For providing us Your Lyceum.
    You have fulfilled your role indeed, as did the Ancient Philosophers, concerned with nothing, but the search for Truth.


  31. polka099 says:

    I am not a specialist but apparently in TCID50 method there are control samples so why Andrew or Lanka are saying that control experiment for viruses has been never done?

    • Tav says:

      bumping this up. I’m not challenging Dr Kaufman or Jon here, in fact I have learnt a great deal listening to them. My question – is viral isolation different from bacterial isolation? Seems like Agar and beef extract is used for bacterial isolation medium which, as per this post, would be considered inaccurate or contaminated. So are we saying using isolation mediums for bacteria and other pathogens is acceptable, while for viruses it is not? How do we reconcile this anomaly? Hope this becomes a learning experience for me.

  32. David Sponseller says:

    Call me “Ironman”, a metallurgist that knows little about medicine, viri, and vaccinations, so I appreciate the many comments by those of you that do. Pathologist Cole recently told the Idaho legislature that Covid-19 should be called “a “Vitamin D deficiency disease”, and that adequate Vitamin D and Ivermectin provide a very strong defense against Covid, without the risks of the vaccines, that Dr. Tenpenny of Cleveland has extensively described [ Google her. ]. Having spent 40,000 hours studying vaccines, she states that the spike protein never leaves the body. It can even attach to ovaries, sperm, and pose the risk of infertility and/or fetal deformity. She also fears that vaccines pose unknown long-term risks, including auto-immune disease that might even carry out a suggestion (by one of you) of human “extinction”…..very scary…..thus the forcing of young people to be vaccinated is foolish policy because they otherwise could carry on the human race!

  33. Amanda says:

    Jon- I’ve been dropping this link all over the place, and just realized I never thanked you for posting it. And thanks for all of your hard work in trying to get the truth out about this never-ending psyop.

  34. tru3 says:

    Important vid!


    This mans strategy in court was to subpoena the minister of health to prove covid exists. He walked.

    IMHO he got lucky

    Legally, it’s practically impossible to prove anything “exists”

    Remember Bill Clinton and the definition of “what is is”?

    Better to go with “I am willing to consider the possibility of being shot up upon proof of your claim that covid has ever been _isolated_.”

    It’s about defining a process, rather than a state of being

    Just my two sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *