SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist: the shocking research of Christine Massey

by Jon Rappoport

January 26, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

You can view the work of Christine Massey at her site, fluoridefreepeel.ca (also, twitter: [1]). She deserves the thanks of every thinking person.

Quoting Massey [2]: “I (CM), along with some anonymous helpers, have submitted Freedom of Information requests to various Canadian institutions seeking records that describe the isolation of ‘SARS-COV-2’ (the alleged ‘COVID-19 virus’) from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.

“My requests were intentionally worded to weed out the fraudulent, illogical and unscientific claims of having ‘isolated SARS-COV-2’, of which there are many…”

“My requests were not limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, and not limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to records of isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet.”

“Colleagues in numerous other countries have obtained responses to the same and similar information requests from dozens of additional institutions.”

“As of January 22, 2021 46 institutions and offices have responded to said requests. Every institution has failed to provide, or cite, even 1 record describing the actual isolation of any ‘SARS-COV-2’ from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever.”

Here is a typical response to a Massey request, from the Ontario Ministry of Health. The response arrived after four months: “This is to inform you that no responsive records were located. A reasonable search of the ministry was conducted, and no responsive records were found. Dr. David C. Williams, Chief Medical Officer of Health, is responsible for this decision.”

NO records indicating SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. “Isolated” means “separated from other material.” It means “we actually found the virus and could identify it.”

ACTUAL ISOLATION MEANS THE VIRUS EXISTS. INABILITY TO ISOLATE IT MEANS THERE IS NO PROOF THE VIRUS EXISTS.

When, as Massey indicates, 46 separate agencies say the same thing—“no records of isolation available”—we are past wondering what is going on. We’re firmly in the territory of FRAUD.

As I’ve stated many times [3] [4], virologists are twisting and torturing the meaning of the word “isolated.” They claim they have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. “In a soup” is the very opposite of “isolated.”

The soup contains animal and human cells, toxic chemicals and toxic drugs, and other genetic material. Some of the cells are dying. The researchers preposterously state the dying must be the result of the virus attacking these cells.

However, the chemicals and drugs could be doing the killing. And the human and animal cells are being starved of nutrients—which fact alone is enough to cause them to die.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the purported (and un-isolated) virus is in the soup in the dish in the lab.

This “proof of isolation” is on the level of claiming the sun is the moon, Alaska is a small town on Saturn, and a rabbit is a spaceship.

It’s no accident that Christine Massey’s relentless investigation has turned up zero records of actual isolation.


SOURCES:

[1] https://twitter.com/ChrisMasseyFOIs

[2] https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/foi-reveals-ontario-ministry-of-health-has-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/

[3] https://twitter.com/jonrappoport/status/1339769925402038273

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6-8VRGvNtQ


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

98 comments on “SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist: the shocking research of Christine Massey

  1. Opie Poik says:

    Even Merck says that if Osama bin Virus did exist, herd immunity would cure it better than the vaccine:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/merck-scraps-covid-vaccines-says-its-more-effective-to-get-the-virus-and-recover/

    WHEN will the new tribunals begin against Mengele 2.0?

    • Chris Hall says:

      Clicking through to the Merck announcement at:

      I see that they found that *their* vaccine candidates were “generally well tolerated, but the immune responses were inferior to those seen following natural infection *and* those reported for *other* SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccines” [my emphasis].

      I didn’t see them saying anything else about other vaccines.

      • Chris Hall says:

        Sorry, for some reason the URL for the Merck announcement got lost. Here it is again:

        https://www.merck.com/news/merck-discontinues-development-of-sars-cov-2-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-continues-development-of-two-investigational-therapeutic-candidates/

        Or:

        Here’s hoping one of those makes it through this time.

      • Frank G L says:

        Hilariously, to me that reads the Merck vaccine, though not as good as simply avoiding vaccines, by virtue of the “immune responses” being inferior (translated that means things like, significantly lower inflammation, significantly lower damage, significantly less chemokine, cytokine, etc activity) is actually significantly more desirable, safer and efficacious than vaccines from astrazeneca, pfizer and moderna.

        Especially considering those had EXCELLENT “immune responses” with a directly scaling “EXCELLENT” amount of adverse reactions or damaging effects. Which some people, who are not “experts” like me, might misinterpret as suggesting that when they say EXCELLENT “immune response” it is actually a direct measure of unnecessary damage. Which of course it is, off the record. So you can completely disregard that notion.

        • Chris Hall says:

          You seem to be saying that the quality of the “immune response” following vaccination (using the currently approved vaccines) is directly related to the “amount of adverse reactions or damaging effects”. If I have understood that correctly, where do I find the data that shows that ?

          As of now Johns Hopkins — https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html — is telling me that in the US there have been 25,769,183 (confirmed) Covid-19 cases and 433,431 related deaths. Compare with CDC — https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html — figures for the 2017-2018 seasonal flu (a bad season) of 45,000,000 cases and 61,000 related deaths.

          So… would the damage of all ~332 million people in the US catching the virus be *necessary* damage ? As opposed to the “unnecessary” damage you appear to claim would be the result of the (currently approved) vaccines ?

          We’re straying from the original point, though. The real point is that Merck were *not* saying that catching the virus is better than being vaccinated with one of the approved vaccines.

          • Frank G L says:

            Sorry, I missed this, I can see you’re in the believer camp (as you suggest something about “catching” the virus), so there’s going to be a bit of a communication difficulty.

            With my reply, I was giving you my interpretation of what’s happening there.

            Firstly, the idea of ~332 million people “catching the virus” is meaningless, the tests are flawed, there’s massive amounts of misattribution and the overwhelming majority are asymptomatic or have minor symptoms.

            There is no apparent spread in the asymptomatic or children, at all. But then, I would also of course say there is simply no spread of it.

            What Merck says regarding efficacy of any vaccines is also irrelevant to me, as they have reason to suggest a potential vaccine from them is useful.

            After all, their existence depends on that sort of marketing, those sort of sales.

            Regarding the damage from the vaccines, when Moderna and Pfizer’s biased bullshit trials come back with…

            https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/race-for-a-vaccine/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine-trail-participant-speaks-out/2417356/

            UCSF Infectious Disease Specialist Dr. Peter Chin-Hong said 25-50% of 75,000 patients involved in the Pfizer and Moderna trials experienced some side effects. Fifteen percent of them were more serious and needed more than a day to recover.

            “It’s your body’s immune system trying to get activated because it’s seeing this new thing and the way that it gets activated is the way you’re feeling which is inflammation,” Chin-Hong said.

            You want to suggest most people should get that unnecessary crap, considering all the fraud, deceit?

            Have you seen how death rates in the UK for the elderly has recently DOUBLED since the introduction of the vaccines?

          • Frank G L says:

            Oh yeah, additionally, considering the fraudulent “virus” is based off some (artificially synthesized to include) crucial innate parts of your own body…the vaccines then, are of course made to attack that newly demonized parts/functions of your body that were conveniently included in the description of the “virus”, before any supposed “isolation”. With that synthesized suggestion being used to make the fraudulent PCR test to then find that fraudulent crap.

            That’s why people get autoimmune issues and so many adverse reactions.

            Also, the vaccines do not prevent the so called infection, transmission OR serious issues related to it.

            Considering all of that, it’s pretty clear what their function is, as usual.

          • Frank G L says:

            If that wasn’t clear enough, here’s an example scenario:

            100 people, they may or may not a positive covid test result.

            3 of those people, show symptoms worth being concerned over, they have some underlying issues, but nothing necessarily major.

            1 of those people, with serious issues, happens to be old and sickly.

            So then, let’s use say, Fauci/WHO logic, regarding “herd immunity” (which is a bunk concept, imo). Let’s say they want 75% vaccinated.

            Now, we have to first ignore the viable considerations for treatment, curing, prevention (minerals, vitamin, minimizing toxicity, etc).

            Then, let’s vaccinate 75 of those people, randomly.

            So, what did we gain? Or, preventatively, whad is prevented? Their underlying issues, deficiencies etc aren’t addressed.

            And now, 75 of them are randomly vaccinated, with a vaccine that has massive amounts of adverse effects, as much as 50% obviously noticeable (no consideration for long term effects), with a significant percentage being serious.

            With their bodies, now unnecessarily having been exposed to toxicity, the vaccine not preventing infection, transmission or serious issues related to the problem it’s supposedly beneficial for. Their bodies, also, thanks to that vaccine, now unnecessarily produces toxic/broken proteins.

            So what did you gain?

    • M Smith says:

      Yes, when will the tribunals begin. It’s so sad to see all these zombies reading : spewing the same lies everyday.

      The elected servants come on with the same lies. This is more than tyranny and something needs to be done.

  2. Tra says:

    When I bring this up, people react with this link which is from cdc explaining their isolation method. Is the argument that they are blurring the definition of isolation as to how it is traditionally used in the viral world? Hard to tell by reading through the link as it is dense with industry terminology.

    https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

    • Diego says:

      Thanks Tra for providing the link to an interesting article published in 2020. I wonder how one of the people they thanked for providing material to aid in there research and died in 2018 pulled that feat off.

    • Lyn P says:

      The virology “industry” can be described similarly to the franken-concoctions they create: jumbled, contaminated, toxified piles of convoluted <> sh**.

      • Marilyn Shepherd says:

        And they are not even as bad as the voodooist called epidemiologists who have all been wildly wrong forever.

        • hhi says:

          Hi Marilyn,

          Thanks for all the work you do fighting for human rights.

          I’m “Milo” from 5aa talkback – I’ve made a comeback recently and got some good airtime talking about morona.

        • Frank G L says:

          I disagree with that about epidemiologists. I find virology far less credible.

          By the nature of epidemiological research, its somewhat open, vague and broad so there’s a lot of gaps to fill, interpretations, etc.

          Epidemiology, while not immune to corruption’s taint and the prevalence of idiocy, I’ve found to be FAR more useful for finding, say, obscured environmental factors or to help fill a more ontological view.

          Which is particularly useful when people try to classify, quantify and categorize any number of effects attributed to singular factors.

          For instance, epidemiology papers informed me to say, the prevalence and importance of selenium deficiency many issues, but notably associated with covid and ebola. Central africa and areas of china where supposed covid was the worst, happened to have rather prevailing selenium deficiency (and in the cases of ebola, vitamin E, significantly, too).

      • JENNYM says:

        And look at the medical industry as a whole, look they cured cancer and diabetes and obesity and MS and all these diseases that 100 years ago were very rare….yes I’m being sarcastic.

        Yes it’s obvious we can blindly trust the medical “experts” since they’re just SO GOOD at CURING US of ALL DISEASES, ha ha ha ha haaaaaa! The biggest saddest joke of all are when people die of cancer or heart disease or diabetes or whatever, and then their families put in their obituaries, “please donate to the (insert disease here) society”! How stupid are they??? Is it going to take a thousand years before the masses wake UP and realize that THEY DON’T CURE ANY DISEASES?!? They’re just sitting on their butts playing video games and pretending to “search” for a cure, but they won’t FIND ONE because it doesn’t PAY!

    • Alan says:

      It’s the usual monkey business, exactly the thing Rappoport described above. “Isolation” from the mouth of virologists is Orwellian Newspeak.

    • Joseph B says:

      I think this might help. In the article, under specimen collection it says,

      “Clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA, were collected as described (1).”

      If you click on the footnote and follow the trail, the identification of the sample in “First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States”:

      https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191

      “Specimens were collected in accordance with CDC guidance and included serum and nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens. After specimen collection, the patient was discharged to home isolation with active monitoring by the local health department.

      “On January 20, 2020, the CDC confirmed that the patient’s nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs tested positive for 2019-nCoV by real-time reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (rRT-PCR) assay.”

      I am not a doctor or anything, and based on what I have read, you can’t isolate a novel pathogen from an infected patient sample and then compare it to a PCR test whose origin itself is never clarified. Especially since the PCR testing is from the CDC, who in their own literature do not claim to have isolated the virus. That’s like determining if you have a new kind of virus with a test which does not contain the new virus you’re testing because you have not yet isolated it yet. It’s circular reasoning. You need to confirm against other viruses and rule them out, with electron micrographs if necessary.

      So these two studies prove only that a coronavirus was found. Not necessarily SARS-COV-2.

      • Noneoftheabove says:

        The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure was devised to replicate DNA, winning its creator, Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize. Mullis wrote and said in interviews that the PCR is not suitable for detecting illness, with the short explanation being that it’s not able to quantify, or count, a virus. Just one virus does not an illness make. So why hasn’t a reliable test been created? If we can launch 5G why not make a quantifiable virus test?

      • Frank G L says:

        Regarding your circular reasoning, I’ve commented pretty much the same thing you said a few times. There are some additional things to add though.

        “So these two studies prove only that a coronavirus was found. Not necessarily SARS-COV-2.”

        Firstly, “coronavirus was found”. Than in itself is a problem, because of WHO (I guess pun unintended) decided what a coronavirus is.

        Secondly, because of the same guys involved with previous coronaviruses (like dorsten, daszak, fauci, CDC, johns hopkins, etc) and the sort of preferential approaches they got, it exacerbates that little peculiarity. Many conflicts of interests and contradictions.

        So let’s look at what, first, covid19 supposedly is. Oh look, they say it came from bats. Which is of course bullshit. Oh look, they happened to have made a test for it (from one very shady character, very shady circumstance) instantly and then used that test to find their projected findings, I guess. Very legit. Especially when the test cannot find that class of “viral DNA”, extrapolates, is fundamentally not suited for that task of diagnostics and run way beyond specification…and I stress again, for the purpose of finding a synthesized suggestion with made up shit.

        So anyway, they say it is KINDA like other coronaviruses (again, when those suggestions are fundamentally fraud, too, kind of a problem) and happens to have a bunch of HUMAN protein descriptions associated with it. I wonder why viruses would be like that. I mean, I can imagine that happening when the virus is actually something FROM my body, knowm sayn?

        Also, how cool is it that the CDC have had patents on coronaviruses, tests, etc for, afaik, a few decades?

    • Kanaka108 says:

      It’s easy to see that they call isolation a mixing of something with something else. So just the opposite of what isolation means. This is a scientific fraud.
      You can see it right there in this paper.

  3. Plam says:

    “COVID-19” does not exist for two reasons:

    1. “Self-replication”. Even if a pathogen came in contact with or penetrated a human cell, the cell does not start reproducing the exact copies of the intruder. Impregnated egg-cell (zygote) does not reproduce sperm. The off-spring carries the traits from both parents, remember?

    2. “Rapid mutation”. DNA explicitly prohibits mutation in nature by keeping species immutable. Mutants exist only in fiction. This rule extends to the micro-world, as well.

    Seasonal Flu, which was assigned the “COVID-19” name this season, is not of a viral nature. The cause of it is a combination of seasonal environmental factors, such as: temperature; humidity or air dryness; pollen (in Spring), abundance of microbial particles in the air (in Fall); seasonal vitamin deficiency, etc. The illness cannot produce “antibodies”, otherwise, we all would be immune by now. Therefore, vaccines are useless against the flu variety. Sick people share common symptoms, but a combination of contributing factors might be so much different.

    • BoogeymanSlayer says:

      Great response! Thank you. The entire “virus” story makes no sense. The “facts” change to fit the failure of the story to explain observations.

      It’s non-living, except when they need it to be alive so they can “kill it” to put in an injection. For your protection, of course.

      It requires a host to reproduce. Except when that doesn’t fit TPTB agenda. Then it does magical things, such as measure six-foot distances in the US and two-meter distances from humans elsewhere. Brainiac molecules, these viruses!

      Somehow, this alleged COVID virus can also reproduce itself by the gazillions WITHOUT a host and land on every surface on the planet, lurking about, in hiding, waiting to locate a human not wearing a face diaper to “infect”.

      It has magical vision, this magical virus! No one will notice the change in the story anymore than the cultists who believe our planet is going to self destruct from a few extra molecules of CO2 in the atmosphere.

      It’s so small that no one alive or formerly alive has ever seen one, yet it can be blocked by a slab of fabric over your airways. The gaps must be about as effective at stopping such a tiny object as it would be to catch a fly with a hula hoop.

      I have also wondered why a virus supposedly coats itself with a protein? Has anyone actually proved this? Does DNA actually have the capacity to do this? By what mechanism does this alternative reality happen?

      Viruses can make you sick. No, wait… You are full of gazillions of them and most of them are helping you. You can catch them from others, just by being close to someone. You can “kill them” with hand sanitizer. You need viruses to survive. Viruses can kill you. I’m so confused!

      How does a virus “know” what its target is? Why that organism as opposed to, say, a spider or a leaf? Why does it reproduce like crazy and then just quit and go away? Why does it stop reproducing? Has anyone figured that out?

      And most of all, what the heck are virologists looking at??? What are they doing, besides using computer models and making CGIs? That, and spending taxpayer loot. That branch of “science” seems as reliable as astronomy, with their black holes, dark, matter, and Big Bang chicanery.

      • Marilyn Shepherd says:

        This one can tell time, distances travelled and what job people have. Here in South Australia where a whole 1:3300 people even had a positive fake PCR test I just tried to make a doctors appointment and was told if I have even a runny nose from hay fever I will have to be treated like a diseased criminal.

        • Frank G L says:

          I’ll give you 3 factors for why Australia has lower covid (false positive) rates.

          Coastal or near coastal living (iodine and electrical activity), lots of sun, PCR tests run at lower cycle thresholds, generally higher living standards (better nutrition/health, other than obsessions with things like vaccines, sunscreens, etc). Simple stuff.

      • Noneoftheabove says:

        Great comment, thank you!

    • Linda Becker says:

      Plam, that was an excellent explanation. One of the best I’ve read so far!

    • Kanaka108 says:

      Can you explain more these 2 reasons? I would like to understand them.

  4. Lisa H says:

    Just another nail in the coffin of a fake pandemic. Yes, many are dying, and have died the past year. It happens every year..what’s different this time is the creation of a fake virus that has morphed into one huge lie. Humans and animals sadly die from the results of drugs..indeed. The mere fact of a vaccine being created so fast is enough for me to sense even more fraud. It’s a long, slow path to death. I firmly believe this entire hoax was created a very long time ago between China and many government entities here in the US..simply to add fuel to their fire of what we’ve all witnessed…election fraud… sadly, now the nightmare and hysteria continues…where will it end?

  5. The Dumb Ox says:

    Thank you, Jon. I appreciate the many blog posts on this subject. I keep coming back to the same question, however. If this virus does not exist as is alleged, then what are these poor folks dying from if not from COVID? If you’ve explained this in a previous post, please direct me there. I do not wish to waste your valuable time unnecessarily nor am I trying to be obtuse or adversarial. I have come to believe as you have made plain that we are dealing with an ethereal foe. Even so, as I present these findings to others, this is the primary question I get from them. I would like to provide a concise and clear answer to these challenges. If you could assist me in this endeavor, I would greatly appreciate it.

    • G says:

      The same things people always die of. Nothing new. Poor diet drugs poison treatments old age

    • Plam says:

      Covid is a Mass Psychogenic Illness

      Mass psychogenic illness is characterized by symptoms, occurring among a group of persons with shared beliefs regarding those symptoms, that suggest organic illness but have no identifiable environmental cause and little clinical or laboratory evidence of disease. Mass psychogenic illness typically affects adolescents or children, groups under stress and females disproportionately more than males. Symptoms often follow an environmental trigger or illness in an index case. They can spread rapidly by apparent visual transmission, may be aggravated by a prominent emergency or media response, and frequently resolve after patients are separated from each other and removed from the environment in which the outbreak began. Physicians should consider this diagnosis when faced with a cluster of unexplained acute illness.

      https://www.aafp.org/afp/2000/1215/p2649.html

      • BoogeymanSlayer says:

        Thanks for posting! I think this phenomenon is a likely explanation for family illness outbreaks. They often eat similarly and are under similar stresses when living together.

        I appreciate the link.

    • Thankful says:

      Jon has a search bar at the top right of this blog, put in what are people dying from, you will get a lot of hits to the articles he has posted answering that question for you.

    • Jennifer Craig says:

      Dumb Ox – What did they die of ten years ago, five years ago, 2 years ago, before you had heard of covid? Did they die and you wern’t interested, or what? Look at the death rates – did they alter? No, they didn’t. The death rate for 2020 was lower than for 2019. You don’t need a mythical virus to explain death.

    • peterbro says:

      A fair question and worthy of a sincere investigation by those who are entrusted to look after the health of the people.

      But but but there will never be an official investigation because those given the duty to serve the people have another agenda and determining the truth of the deaths and symptoms does not serve them.

      It is not for Jon to answer that question (although the evidence can lead to some conclusions) but for the authorities to justify their actions, assertions and premises.

    • Lyn P says:

      Go to UncoverDC dot com and read the recent article “Have 400,000 Americans Died of Covid-19?” This is one of a number of these type analyses coming out covering all of 2020, which more and more show the utter manipulation of “figures” trying to prove something called “covid19.”

      In this article it highlights in particular what is a blatant “messing with” stats at year-end.

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      Old age, that is all, and other illnesses. Same as usual, why do people asking this stupid question seem to think everyone was immortal till ”covid”.

    • Marc Lee Merrill says:

      Ask yourself…If we had such an unprecedented “pandemic” then why did roughly the same number of people (total deaths by year) remain basically the same as 2019, 2018, 2017? If people were dying from a novel deadly virus, wouldn’t we have seen that number spike considerably on top of all the usual deaths?

  6. Pisces says:

    Thanks for sharing this article and Christine Massey’s work.

    Related: “Has COVID19 Been Isolated? with Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Thomas Cowan”

    https://theconsciousresistance.com/has-covid19-been-isolated-with-dr-andrew-kaufman-and-dr-thomas-cowan/

    • Lyn P says:

      Dr. Cowan doesn’t have the fanciest production value in his videos but continues to be a valuable resource for busting the whole viral disease dogma overall. He says he’ll be diving into this throughout 2021. Subscribe to him on BitChute!

  7. Opie Poik says:

    Dr. Anthony Fauci: The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire US Federal Government
    https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/dr-anthony-fauci-highest-paid-employee-entire-us-federal-government

    • BigTim says:

      What about his wife?

    • TMgreen says:

      Unbelivable. Fauci has still not disclosed what happened to the missing billions in spending throughout his many years as head of the NIH despite being ordered by the US government to do so. Now it gets dropped AGAIN, along with the thousands he directly killed through knowly pushing toxic drugs to the forefront and he gets rewarded. No other current non-elected employee has stolen as much money as Anothony Fauci and he gets another raise.

  8. Ed says:

    Sadly the Canadian Prime Minister would ignore a request like this.
    It would blow his cover and expose his Agenda His vision supersedes the welfare of the Canadian People. The words coming from his mouth say Agenda 2030 and Vaccines are on the way. If the people only new what would be injected into them (real informed consent) most would say no

  9. Steve says:

    A penguin is a spaceship, not a rabbit.

    Rabbits are in charge of the drone strikes.

  10. Piksil says:

    Thanks Jon!

    This, along with Dr Stephan Lanka, Jim West, Dawn Lester and David Parker’s work make yesterday’s post moot (Pharma insider keeping the virus theory/germ theory alive–controlled opposition–supposedly a ‘dissident’).

    • Lyn P says:

      Never enough time to keep up with the work of these good folks. I particularly recommend David Icke’s interview of Dawn Lester. Posted 1/17 on his BitChute channel.

  11. From Elsewhere says:

    This COVID-19 hoax is criminal. For that, there is plenty of evidence. We just need to endure until the naked King is dead, for justice to prevail, in all truth.

    • D. Smith says:

      Covid is really nothing more than any other seasonal flu outbreak. The weakest are, as always, the elderly, for which Andrew dumb-butt Cuomo did the most dangerous thing any person could ever do – – he stuck people who had the flu in with the elderly in NURSING HOMES, of all things. And then he wins some stupid award. Our society is completely upside down.

      The really sad part is that President Trump was actually calling for these “vaxxzines” to be FAST-Tracked even though no one knew anything about them and no one really needed them. No actual research was ever really done, we just blindly took the word of the Chinese Empire. Good grief people. I didn’t know the USA was so cotton pickin’ dumb.

  12. “SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist”
    That shouldn’t stop us from fighting the pandemic by all means.
    There is surely no doubt that this virus and all of it’s trillions mutations exist at the end if the day.
    I mean, what else could cause a pandemic that threatens all life?
    “Let’s think for minute, let’s think”…

  13. ReluctantWarrior says:

    It’s pretty clear to me that it doesn’t exist except in the hypnotized minds of the sheeple. What we have is essentially a mutated strain in the Corona family of viruses. The real killer, according to health researcher Bill Sardi is a vitamin B1 (Thiamine)deficiency which mimics the symptoms of a virus. What causes this deficiency? Over consumption of Alcohol, Caffeine, foods that are not nutritious etc. It is really a deadly feedback loop of the lock-downs that is causing people to get sick not COVID-19.

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/no_author/can-you-believe-this-a-real-medical-breakthrough-in-an-era-of-fake-news/

    • David M Pelly says:

      Reluctant warrior,

      Vitamin C and D are more important than B1 for immunity to colds flues and other acute respiratory distress disorders.

      • Frank G L says:

        It kinda depends on what the person’s status is. But I basically agree, considering trends.

        Anyway, adding to your comment there, not just C and D. I vitamin ACED my tests.

        Aside from that, noticing that they all have function related to antioxidization and antiinflammation is the sort of thing people need to take note of.

        Most of these sorts of problems result from mitochondrial overload, so to say. The resulting sub-optimal ATP function usually related to that is a lack of antioxidation.

        And people shouldn’t be fooled into thinking that they only need like vitamin C and quercetin. There are countless antioxidants and they have varying functions. People in general should try to get a good variety of antioxidants from foods. Flavonoids, phenols, terpenes, anthocyanins, etc. Some other elements too, like selenium (also a big factor in covid).

        There are also particularly important antioxidant factors that are completely overlooked, when, to my mind it would seem they are essential. Things like PQQ and CoQ10.

        Here’s an overview of PQQ to get an idea: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/pyrroloquinoline-quinone

        Additionally, two of the biggest factors have been virtually unmentioned by EVERYONE.

        Iodine and potassium.

        Iodine deficiency is VERY common (about as common as vitamin D deficiency, and it is similarly crucial), worsened by societal factors (excessive chlorine, fluorine, bromine).

        Potassium imbalance (deficiency as such) is also a massive societal problem, with the main related factors being the prevalence of sodium and chloride. Essentially, the balance is the opposite of what it should be. Typically people use sodium at a 30:1 ratio vs potassium. Messes up bodily electrical function, particularly related to nerves, brain, kidney, heart function.

      • D. Smith says:

        All of the B vitamins are important, don’t discount them. Also D3 and K2. Liposomal C for those of us who cannot tolerate regular vitamin C (goes in one end and straight out the other, if you know what I mean!). Those are the basics anyone should take, but as an aside, take the B vitamins in separate pills (such as, B1, B6, Folate not folic acid, & B12 for a good beginning). I use Solgar brand.

        You don’t hafta take a lot of junk (never take a multi-vitamin) to stay healthy. Sometimes I take olive leaf for extra measure. There are many herbs which are also valuable to our health.

  14. Jim says:

    Don’t worry. Since the WHO has determined that there have been too many false positives, and are now encouraging we have more stringent requirements for a covid diagnosis, the pandemic will soon be over.

    • BoogeymanSlayer says:

      Hmmmm. I think the WHO actually means they believe there are too many humans, and that they will continue to find ways to initially slow-kill the population whilst extracting as much wealth from them as exists in the meantime. Not wanting to destroy the infrastructure too badly for their own “benevolent” usage, slowly poisoning people to death will maximize profits while reducing the population and expenses for themselves. Let the peasants (us) beg for their own demise. If it goes too slowly, there are alternative plans, Comrades.

    • DC Miami says:

      Wrong. This alleged pandemic is being exploited to the max. This is just a temporary strategy to give them some modicum of credibility and a way to credit Sleepy Joe and discredit Trump.

      They will use new “strains” or “mutations” as their next false flag after another partial, fake economic “reopening” which will be followed by “whoops, we were too quick; you bad freedom loving people are at fault and you need to be punished.” It will mean new rounds of vaccines and more and more coercive measures to get them into more and more people’s bodies. Those who remain unvaxxed will probably be killed.

      This will be repeated in cyclical form until the NWO takeover is fully implemented.

      • Lyn P says:

        DC Miami – this is my expectation as well, unless a quicker swell of what is still so far “patches” of awakening and resistance.

        The global legal system, though being attempted, is too far gone in terms of corruption and compromise to be of use.

  15. Nancy says:

    Thanks… again, Jon. But we see ‘pictures of the virus’ all the time… it is a sphere with 2 kinds of funny things attached to it’s surface, and labeled, ‘the virus’.

    So, no wonder folks think it is real, after this subtle, pervasive brainwashing. Obviously, the picture is an artist’s imagined rendition, based on no real EM image.

    I think we need to repeat everywhere that any ‘picture’ is not the real deal. It is fake.

  16. John Thomas says:

    This appeared yesterday but I fear this should probably be taken with a pinch or two of salt. https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1353730598121181184?s=20

  17. terry shead says:

    I am in the uk, it frustrates me a lot when you tell these brain washed sheep that you are going to get poisoned by this cr-p vaccine?

    • Frank G L says:

      Remind them how the (biased groups, horrible protocols, specifications, bullshit placebo, etc, whatever to make it look better) trials went and ask them if they were able of passing grade 1 arithmetic.

      https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/race-for-a-vaccine/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine-trail-participant-speaks-out/2417356/

      “UCSF Infectious Disease Specialist Dr. Peter Chin-Hong said 25-50% of 75,000 patients involved in the Pfizer and Moderna trials experienced some side effects. Fifteen percent of them were more serious and needed more than a day to recover.

      “It’s your body’s immune system trying to get activated because it’s seeing this new thing and the way that it gets activated is the way you’re feeling which is inflammation,” Chin-Hong said. ”

      Translated: “Body sees toxic damaging shit and goes nuts”

  18. Seahorse says:

    Observe the agenda continuing to roll out. Now we need nanotechnology to combat the “mutant strains” of the nonexistent virus.

    https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/01/26/nanoparticle-technology-holds-promise-for-protecting-against-many-coronavirus-strains-at-once/

    I will leave the link to the study in an additional comment.

  19. Seahorse says:

    Three blind mice.
    See how they run.
    Must be the butcher’s wife, Corona.

    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/01/11/science.abf6840

  20. James White says:

    I don’t see any of this as being about a virus. I am putting SARS2-cov firmly in the category of “weapons of mass destruction”. These are “pearl harbour like catalyzing events” (to quote an earlier, Perl/Wolfowitz document) which are pre-empted and magnified in order to give reason to implement a pre-existing plan. 911 brought the Patriot Act. Weapons of mass destruction brought the invasion of Iraq. Today’s pre-existing plan appears to be the “Great Reset” and the bankrupting of The West.

  21. Jim S Smith says:

    I still say that a lot of whatever “enhanced” illnesses/deaths that may have occurred, (and most likely accelerated being that we ARE seeing a gradual increase in deaths-per-100000, annually) – would point to psychosomatic causes too!

    It’s the very same thought behind hypochondria and the “willed-illness”. So, many of these so-called “science-believers” who are scared-to-death of an unknown “bug” – are most likely also part of the cause in their own illness and it’s severity: “They are establishment-conditioned HYPOCHONDRIACS”.

    • Lyn P says:

      There are a number of angles to investigate changes in “normal” amount/rate of deaths. Seems to me one very basic ignored factor in the U.S. is — What percentage of people per 100,000 are people over 75, due to an aging cohort overall?

      The lying media choses hysteria and fear porn over even the most basic reason. Or math.

      • Frank G L says:

        And worse, the regulators, institutions, “authorities” that are supposed to be for healthcare and welfare are the ones responsible.

        Why, for instance, is the public not allowed vaccine safety related statistics, data, ingredients?

        Why are known issues like 2000x too much aluminum (if they were to adhere to their own suggestions) in vaccines ignored?

        Vitamin D and iodine deficiencies, relating to woefully inadequate RDA/RDIs?

        Chlorine, fluorine, bromine damage, why is that not addressed?

        The huge amounts of endocrine disruptors fueling the soyboy/metrosexual pandemic? Not even acknowledged.

        Btw, did you know glyphosate toxicity, at agriculturally relevant (common) levels, is compounded non-linearly by “background” ionizing radiation to be around 10x more toxic? Which is then further compounded by other ingredients.

        Why are valid EMF concerns completely ignored and lied about?

        Shit, I can explain to you how a P.E.T scan can be causative in cancer.

        Anyway, the problem is caused by top-down implementations of policies. For example, Rockefeller (or someone like Bill Gates) trying to dictate medical policies.

        There’s the solution, btw. Firstly, to recognize systemically it is failure. Secondly, that it is designed for exploitation/malice. Thirdly, that you can not fix it and it has to be destroyed.

        So yeah, I have no hope. Just glad I don’t have offspring in this world and that I have no interest in survival.

  22. Post Hoc says:

    The next issue the medical establishment will have to face before they go under is an explanation of why bacteria gravitate to damaged tissue as scavengers to clean up and not to cause any disease.

    For too long we have been led up the garden path by spurious explanations of disease and the dread of bacteria.

    Bacteria and viruses are the clean up crew, not the baddies.

  23. Jean Wilson says:

    This is how the mRNA injection kills the elderly:

    It’s like injecting people who have nut allergies with peanuts

    What it does is… this gene therapy or medical device is setting up an autoimmune disease chronically.

    It’s anaphylaxis in the first wave. It’s anaphylaxis +allergic reaction the 2nd wave. But the 3rd reaction occurs when you come across whatever the messenger RNA is against (virus, bacterium, etc.), and now you have stimulated your immune system to have a low-grade autoimmune disease, not immunity to yourself per se because the mRNA is expressing a viral protein.

    “Now you made yourself a genetically modified organism, and so the immune system that is meant to push the viruses or bacteria out… now the autoimmune reaction is attacking your body low grade.

    “Now (months later) when you come across the virus that stimulates the immune system to get rid of the virus and when it (the immune system) sees that you have viral proteins in your own cells and organs, then about a week later (the adaptive immune system kicks in, the mechanism that makes specific long-term memory antibodies against a pathogen) and you go into organ failure.

    Because your immune system is killing your own organs. Those patients will present as sepsis initially. Then (later) you die of organ failure.

    “Normally, because the mRNA is in every cell of their body, it’s almost unstoppable. It destroys the heart, or the spleen, or the lungs, or the liver because the mRNA is expressing the protein in every cell.

    according to Professor Cahill, the really severe reactions will be latent – occur months later.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/01/26/think-three-times-before-taking-the-covid-vaccine/

  24. Charles says:

    Isnt a FOIA request for the USA only? In canada it would be useless

  25. billy hill says:

    Has any type of virus ever neen isolated?
    Has any flu virus or virus ever been isolated and proven to exist?

  26. Jyrkoff says:

    Sigh. This is just another version of the “no excess deaths in 2020” claim that was utterly demolished. Many “truthers” had to watch their credibility crumble when excess deaths due to lockdowns indeed spiked. “Excess overdose deaths!” and “”suicide spike!” cannot be reconciled with “no extra deaths in 2020=no pandemic!!” So crow was eaten by many.

    Now, a year of “the virus was made in a lab!” turns into “there is no virus at all!”

    Sorry, but one or the other can be true, but not both. Either it’s real, lab-made and is the bioweapon we’ve been warning people about for years, or it’s a total hoax and there was never a virus at all.

    China has sought to create a bioweapon that only sickens and does not kill any young or healthy person. The idea is not to kill billions but rather to weaken the enemy enough for a takeover, for dominion, while killing just enough people to scare everyone.

    This is what C19 is. It’s real, it didn’t come from nature, and it’s hardly a lethal threat– because it was designed to be so. The only reason there are “no isolates available” is due to their high demand. In fact, the virus has been completely sequenced, isolated, and has even been imaged, albeit a very poor image.

    I assume people are intelligent enough to find this information themselves so I won’t insult them with links.

    • Frank G L says:

      Was that sequencing and isolation perhaps based on a synthesized suggestion?

      Other than that, I see you’re saying it’s definitely not real, it’s definitely not just China and that the actual weapons are policies and the vaccines.

    • hhi says:

      A virus was created in a lab with PEG and put in a “vaccine”.

      “Viruses” are exosomes.

      When harvested, exosomes have to be stored at -70C.

      The only way a “virus” can get into your body is by injection.

      “Virus” is wrong linguistically as well, as it cleans up poisons so can’t be a poison itself.

  27. Noneoftheabove says:

    And it’s possible to stop a runny nose with C and E vitamins every two hours, and zinc will shut down a cold.

  28. MickMo says:

    Why is it so difficult for people to comprehend that USA elections are 100% fake dog and pony shows? All this blather about stolen elections and election fraud. The puppet representing the fake left paradigm versus the puppet representing the fake right paradigm is all you get period. Makes no difference to the cabal who “wins” they own and control them both. Trump or Biden? Tweedle dee versus Tweedle dum. Same thing all over again. If you can see that this virus is a hoax, why can’t you see that elections are hoaxes?

  29. Sarah Conly says:

    I grew viruses and purified them. Get a sample, do PCR to amplify the sample so you can do testing. Polymerase chain reaction will grow a sequence of dna or rna over and over and over again. Then you have a sample that you can run in an acrylamide gel to get the sequence. To purify a virus, you need to grow it in cell culture, then spin it in an ultra high speed centrifuge for about 6 hours in a gel (can’t remember exactly what it was) that layers based on molecular weight (ie the cells, the other stuff, and the virus component, all go to a different layers in the gel after 6 hours of ultra high speed centrifugation. Then you take a needle and suck out very carefully the purified virus. At that point you could then check on an electron microscope that allows a person to see nanoparticles, repeat the pcr to have a purified virus sample, grow it again in tissue culture if you wanted to see if the sera that has antibodies neutralized the virus (in a 96 well plate). How can people say that they haven’t isolated the virus? there are electron microscope pictures – I don’t think they drew them.

    • Devon Seamoor says:

      Yes, Sarah Conly, your explanation correlates with the clear explanation by Judy Mikovits, in the video I’ve shared here in my comment. There’s much confusion, and it takes patience to find the dots and connect them until the picture is clear. Your explanation is excellent, it’s clear that you speak based on real-life experience, of your work with viruses.

  30. Norm says:

    If Sars-Cov-2 has not been isolated, how do you explain:

    Novel 2019 coronavirus genome:

    https://virological.org/t/novel-2019-coronavirus-genome/319

    Scrolling down the page, see a table with five records of Sars-Cov-2 from human hosts.

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

  31. andrew adach says:

    Lockdown deaths from suicide etc have been offset by the fact that people have been afraid to see their GPs and thus have missed the chance of being killed through iatrogenesis. This balances against extra lockdown deaths and makes the tally similar with other year death counts. Malnutrition ,EMFs,Pysops , and the emotional plague all adding to the weaponization of the common cold and added to the mix a ” lust for dominance” by petty tyrants, with continent shifting amounts of greed and you got a galloping plandemic.Pure evil.

  32. Dennis says:

    I was very very sick for 8 days, starting Dec 28 then went to the hospital for a week and diagnosed with covid and now home going on third week after hospital discharge, home on oxygen and essentially bed rest still weak and breathless after the slightest physical exertion. I’m 67 other than severe pain issues due to previous neck and back fractures I was in good health. Now after losing 35 pounds since Dec 28 and losing all my strength, the Doctor says I am recovering and that could take several more months. This wasn’t the flu this was far worse.

  33. Kanaka108 says:

    Some one now make a book for this issue, there is enough informations to show and class in a nice way.

  34. Wally Peterson says:

    I’m not a scientist nor did I read through every comment before this. I don’t believe anything that’s been said about this supposed pandemic, but I also don’t know for sure what the truth is.

    To this specific article/post, my hangup is with this that I found from last June – https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

    It states in part, “We also deposited the virus into 2 virus repositories, making it broadly available to the public health and research communities.”

    Is this true or does anyone know the explanation that reconciles this with the assertion of the virus having not been isolated? I appreciate any help.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *