New Zealand government preparing to drown whole country in fluorides

by Jon Rappoport

March 16, 2017

The issue here is, who is going to decide whether the people of New Zealand are fluoridated? Who will be in charge? Communities, or the federal government?

From The NZHerald, 3/13/16—my comments are in CAPS:

“MPs are expecting furious opposition to proposals on fluoridated drinking water as public hearings kick off this week.”

“The first select committee hearings will be held tomorrow on the Government’s plan to transfer the responsibility for fluoridating water from councils to district health boards (DHBs).” [TRANSFER THE DECISION FROM LOCAL COMMUNITIES TO LARGER FEDERAL ENTITIES—A TAKEOVER.]

“In a rare move, Parliament’s Health Committee has agreed to hear from every individual or organisation that asked to make an oral submission.”

“In total, 60 organisations and 140 individuals are expected to give presentations, and the committee will be broken up into sub-committees in order to hear them all.” [IN OTHER WORDS, THE FULL COMMITTEE WON’T HEAR ANY INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION—A CLUE THAT THE “TOLERANCE” FOR EVERY POINT OF VIEW IS JUST A SHOW.]

“’The committee felt that hearing from everyone on this was important’, committee chairman and National MP Simon O’Connor said.”

“’It’s a passionate topic. People feel very strongly about it and we thought … the best way to manage that was to allow them to be heard’.” [YES, HEARD, BEFORE BEING IGNORED. THE COMMITTEE HAS ALREADY MADE UP ITS MIND.]

“Most of the submissions to the committee were against the law change, O’Connor said.”

“At present, territorial authorities decide whether to fluoridate the local water supply.” [JUST AS IT SHOULD BE.]

My further comments: right now, only 27 territories (out of a total of 67) in New Zealand have decided to fluoridate their water supplies. The majority of territories understand the toxicity of fluorides.

The federal government wants to take over and fluoridate everybody. The feds consider anti-fluoride activists the enemy and bunch of crazies.

I also suspect that money is an issue. Somebody close to the federal government is poised to make large profits from selling the chemicals, when the government decides the whole population should be toxified.

For the edification of New Zealand’s feds, who believe “the science is settled” and opposing activists are anti-science, here is a famous bombshell letter, written by the head of the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) union of in-house scientists, William Hirzy.

Quoting from a May 1, 1999, statement— “Why EPA’s Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation”—written by William Hirzy, PhD, [Union of Scientists] Senior Vice-President, Chapter 280:

“…our opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown, based on the scientific literature documenting the increasingly out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the lack of benefit to dental health from ingestion of fluoride and the hazards to human health from such ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard, such as to people with impaired kidney function, as well as chronic toxic hazards of gene mutations, cancer, reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone pathology and dental fluorosis.”

“In support of this concern are results from two epidemiology studies from China that show decreases in I.Q. in children who get more fluoride than the control groups of children in each study. These decreases are about 5 to 10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years.”

“Another troubling brain effect has recently surfaced: fluoride’s interference with the function of the brain’s pineal gland. The pineal gland produces melatonin which, among other roles, mediates the body’s internal clock, doing such things as governing the onset of puberty. Jennifer Luke has shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and inhibits its production of melatonin. She showed in test animals that this inhibition causes an earlier onset of sexual maturity, an effect reported in humans as well in 1956…”

“EPA fired the Office of Drinking Water’s chief toxicologist, Dr. William Marcus, who also was our local union’s treasurer at the time, for refusing to remain silent on the cancer risk issue. The judge who heard the lawsuit he [Marcus] brought against EPA over the firing made that finding—that EPA fired him over his fluoride work and not for the phony reason put forward by EPA management at his dismissal. Dr. Marcus won his lawsuit and is again at work at EPA.”

“…data showing increases in osteosarcomas in young men in New Jersey, Washington and Iowa based on their drinking fluoridated water. It was his [Dr. Marcus’] analysis, repeated statements about all these and other incriminating cancer data, and his requests for an independent, unbiased evaluation of them that got Dr. Marcus fired.”

“Regarding the effectiveness of fluoride in reducing dental cavities, there has not been any double-blind study of fluoride’s effectiveness as a caries preventative. There have been many, many small scale, selective publications on this issue that proponents cite to justify fluoridation, but the largest and most comprehensive study, one done by dentists trained by the National Institute of Dental Research, on over 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years, shows no significant differences (in terms of decayed, missing and filled teeth) among caries [cavities] incidences in fluoridated, non-fluoridated and partially fluoridated communities. The latest publication on the fifty-year fluoridation experiment in two New York cities, Newburgh and Kingston, shows the same thing. The only significant difference in dental health between the two communities as a whole is that fluoridated Newburgh, N.Y. shows about twice the incidence of dental fluorosis (the first, visible sign of fluoride chronic toxicity) as seen in non-fluoridated Kingston.”

“John Colquhoun’s publication on this point of efficacy is especially important. Dr. Colquhoun was Principal Dental Officer for Auckland, the largest city in New Zealand, and a staunch supporter of fluoridation—until he was given the task of looking at the world-wide data on fluoridation’s effectiveness in preventing cavities. The paper is titled, ‘Why I changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation.’ In it Colquhoun provides details on how data were manipulated to support fluoridation in English speaking countries, especially the U.S. and New Zealand. This paper explains why an ethical public health professional was compelled to do a 180 degree turn on fluoridation.”

“…mutation studies…show that fluoride can cause gene mutations in mammalian and lower order tissues at fluoride concentrations estimated to be present in the mouth from fluoridated tooth paste. Further, there were tumors of the oral cavity seen in the NTP cancer study…further strengthening concern over the toxicity of topically applied fluoride.”

“So, in addition to our concern over the toxicity of fluoride, we note the uncontrolled — and apparently uncontrollable — exposures to fluoride that are occurring nationwide via drinking water, processed foods, fluoride pesticide residues and dental care products…For governmental and other organizations to continue to push for more exposure in the face of current levels of over-exposure coupled with an increasing crescendo of adverse toxicity findings is irrational and irresponsible at best.”

“We have also taken a direct step to protect the [EPA] employees we represent from the risks of drinking fluoridated water…the union filed a grievance, asking that EPA provide un-fluoridated drinking water to its employees.”

“The implication for the general public of these calculations is clear. Recent, peer-reviewed toxicity data, when applied to EPA’s standard method for controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an immediate halt to the use of the nation’s drinking water reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer industry.”

That last sentence lets you know where the fluorides are coming from.

So…an employees’ union of scientists within the EPA has made its position clear.

Quite clear.

The mainstream press has refused to cover this story in any significant way for 17 years.

The federal government of New Zealand doesn’t care about any of this.

They just want to give the gift of poison to whole population of the country, and call it science.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.


  1. Greg C. says:

    In Boise, Idaho, the water is already naturally fluoridated, yet there are still factions that want to have it added to the water supply! Not the dentists, but the dental insurance groups (follow the money).

  2. henry says:

    Last year I bought a house. In my search there were some areas where the water is fluoridated and some ares where it is not. In the fluoridated areas, each house had a whole house water filter. In the other areas, nobody had such a filtration system. I asked the agents about this and they had no idea what I was talking about. I asked why the home owners don’t vote for decision makers to change this. Again it was like I was talking a different language. The idea was so foreign to them that they could not comprehend the idea that fluoride might be harmful or that the people can do anything about it.

    I decided to not buy a house in a fluoridated area because it was fluoridated.

  3. IMNAHA says:

    As I predicted years ago when the Chemical Manufacturers lobbying arm started usurping local control of these chemical / environmental issues at the STATE level, they wouls eventually move to the NATIONAL level and it appears that is what is happening in NZ. It’s all part of the globalists/technocratic/Talmudic “humans are cattle” philosophy.

  4. Neo-Paradigm says:

    The hazardous material involved in this hazmat disaster is fluorosilicic acid which is the acid used to fluoridate drinking water, so it’s likely that the truck was on it’s way to dump it’s load of corrosive poison at water municipalities. This is what goes into our water supply supposedly to benefit children’s teeth by giving them fluorde. It’s insane!

    • Theodore says:

      Wow! Thanks for posting this. “The hazardous material was identified as fluorosilicic acid, which can cause irritation to the nose, throat, respiratory system, swelling of the skin and severe eye irritation, said Meaghan Quinn, spokesperson for Kingston General Hospital.”

  5. Jennifer Miner says:

    The problem with fluoride is that it can over time calcify the Pineal Gland. The Pineal Gland holds the Speciel Mind, and our conscience is our Speciel Mind’s counseling of us, which is our connection to God. This is where He hides within us.

    If the Pineal Gland is blocked, which we call dissimulation, then our conscience is blocked and we can no longer get God’s guidance, and then other minds can interfere, and we may not be able to differentiate them from our own mind.

    Many of the SSRI drugs, Tamiflu, Chantix, can dissimulate the mind because they are also fluoride based, and this is why people on them often do things they wouldn’t ordinarily do. We can cite many examples. The veterans being treated for PTSD who are on drugs like Zoloft or Prozac get dissimulated, and then other minds get in there, make them hurt, make them think they want to commit suicide and many of them do, not knowing the thoughts are not their own.

    This is why they want our people fluoridated. Rudolph Steiner predicted over 100 years ago they would develop a vaccine which would sever us from our spirituality, into materialism. We think this is why he was talking about and may be why they are pushing vaccines.

    • Terri says:

      Thank you for adding this Jennifer. Bacopa Monnieri, a sacred Ayurveda herb helps clear the pineal gland and strengthen the brain.

    • caws says:

      For a list of fluorinated drugs go to and click on the FTRC link. Over 300+ in many categories. Beware!

      • Jennifer Miner says:

        Thanks, Terri, Caws! People do not realize there is another mind on the planet that is empathetic. Call it Satan or whatever, we just call it the Alien Mind. Think JeSus called them sorcerers and magicians as He condemned them.

      • Michael says:

        Flourinated drugs…hell the coated frying pan or cookware you use to cook your food is made of a fusion of carbon and flourine (flouride is a salt made from flourine, flourine is a gas)
        Teflon the most stable molecule in the world, it will not break down. And is the most toxic thing to a brain and a pineal gland It is the most dangerous molecule on the planet.

        And that is after how many years of cooking our eggs on an aluminum frying pan. Aluminum also an ingredient of SSRI’s

        My pineal is squeeky clean, actually its too clean, I have this sound between my eyes its so clean. Like a high pitched whistle…lol

    • Bunny says:

      I would like to hear more..the materialism is driving me around the bend..this ridiculous self negating philosophy is like a blind man trying to describe the color orange.,

      Also heard that they use Tamarind Extract to flush the excess fluoride from the system of Indian children in areas where India is naturally over fluoridate.
      Interestingly tamarind extract (quite tasty) is used in Indian cooking.

      • Jennifer Miner says:

        It is interesting about tamarind. It was an ingredient in a sauce we liked, but expensive on its own right.

        Humanity is more than their genetics. We were given a Speciel Mind or Speciel Memory, as each sort of animal is given theirs, which directs their behaviors and what genes get expressed and which do not. We see it in the animals as instinct and they are bound to it. Humanity was given a mind with which to Reason, the capacity for speech, and free will in our Speciel Mind and we can strengthen or weaken our Speciel Mind by how we think and by what we do. It should be our goal as humans to strengthen our Speciel Mind to help us evolve.

        However, there is another speciel mind on the planet which we call the Alien Mind, because it should be alien to us but we often accept it as our own. It is a very deceptive mind and works to destroy humanity at every turn. The religions might call it Satan.

        We, our humanity, is the fourth generation of humanity on the Earth. The first is designated as Adam, the second, Noah, the third, Nimrod. Each generation has a time period to learn the lesson of this plane of life, which is to learn to live in peace with each other and those that learn the lesson get to advance. Those that do not are cast back to start over again. There were those of the third generation who did not evolve and were to be cast back, but they caused us, the up and coming generation, to mix our seed with the lower animals and which created a confusion in our Speciel Mind and Man/God could not differentiate. He would have to cast our new generation back as well. However, since Man sees Time as All One, He could see that some of our generation would evolve and so He decided to let the Wheat, our generation, mature along with the Tares, the rebellious ones, and at the time of Harvest, He would pull out the Tares and burn them. This is the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares of which JeSus spoke.

        So, we have to learn to identify this mind, and, of course, we see it in high places, governments, religions, etc. but we also have to look within and cast out the Seven Deadly Sins the Alien Mind projects, fear, hate, shame, greed, lust, and prejudice, hoping to get us to accept them, justify them, and create chaos in our world. So, many are under its influence and the traitor maggots want to make it even worse by dissimulating our minds so that we can’t get help from Man to help ourselves. The mind is so advanced and works years ahead and where they are all empathetic with each other, we are separate and do not have their vantage point. This is why we need God’s help and why JeSus gave the the Perfect Pattern to follow, as He always followed the will of His Father in Heaven, who we know as Man.

        Delamer Duverus

  6. Squiggles says:

    They say that fluoroapatite is more resistant to acids. It is, slightly, but the fluorine ion on the tooth’s surface prevents remineralization since it is only monovalent and cannot form two bonds. It’s like a chain terminator.

    It probably works by poisoning bacteria that break down teeth. With that said, high concentrations are markedly bad for teeth and create fluoroapatite spots.

    There is no reason to put it in drinking water since it’s toxic. If you think it’s good for teeth (its not really), then simply using a mouthwash would be much better.

    This is mass medication. The whole teeth issue is just a mildly plausible subterfuge.

  7. I suspect Rappaport is spot on when he states “Somebody close to the federal government is poised to make large profits from selling the chemicals, when the government decides the whole population should be toxified.” That always seems to be the case when governments start pushing toxic chemicals.

    • Andrew Manche says:

      always follow the money, because we all know that neither science nor healthcare motivate the governments of the world

  8. kadicha says:

    Actually there is a gigantic “elephant in the room” that is frighteningly ignored almost universally.
    @Jennifer Miner ‘s post is the key. All sane anti-fluoridationists in the world are aware of the terrible debilitating effects of this international program, but very rarely do you ever hear/read of the ultimate aim for this program which is very simple and straightforward and extremely well documented in German “Uber Alles” literature, is the control of the masses – to stop them thinking. It works very well, just look around.

    Equally scary, is the international rush by the Germans chemical cartel to get universal medication into everybody else before the mother of all financial crashes happens/becomes final.

    • MachtNichts says:

      The “gigantic” elephant in the room, namely international programs to subdue populations by overdosing them with fluoride is a phantom, strictly speaking.

      Adding fluoride to drinking water originated in the USA when Dr. Frederick McKay and Dr. Green Vardiman Black attended a dental convention in 1909 initiated by the Colorado State Dental Association. Of course, this story was put out by your benevolent .gov and the first large-scale fluoridation in history started later in Grand Rapids, Mich., in 1945 and not in Europe.. All in the name of preventive medicine.

      As for Deutschland Ueber Alles, world domination and control of the masses by medication, well, 97% of Continental Europe does not add fluoride to their tap water. Neither does China. India is also free of that menace. The only places having to deal with fluoride outside the US and Canada are where it is naturally occurring, Which doesn’t mean it is harmless but far removed from mass medication.

      Claiming that Hitler and the evil nazis started it is a sign of willful ignorance and/or deliberate disinformation.

    • Jennifer Miner says:

      This is why we thought Obamacare was installed, if you were a part of it, then you had to comply with their rules.

  9. kadicha says:

    It is true – New Zealanders do get quite aggressive when threatened. Do need medicating to fall in line with “accepted” World G.M.O. practises…..

  10. gregh says:

    They started fluoridating the water in Mount Gambier, South Australia about seven years ago. The SA dental association recently released a statement saying there has been a 20% decrease in cavities in big teeth in 12 year olds who attended one dental clinic. They did not mention cavities in other ages. No doubt they cherry picked. The local media lied to people by reporting it as a 20% reduction in all children. This behaviour from dumb a*s media is typical.
    There should be studies done on prescription rates for thyroid and depression meds before and after fluoridation.

  11. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    I hope this issue has a huge turnout and is squashed for good. Come on, all those living in NZ. Sort this for the sake of your children and grandchildren.

  12. Has industrial pollution in the water risen to the point they can’t “conceal” it anymore?

    Jon, “fluorides” is a cover – something for the dumb crusader to blame.


  13. Free Your Mind says:

    There are many other things done by “health authorities” to mind-control people. Look at the US Government’s “FunVax” (“Fundamentalist Vaccine”) where they secretly developed a vaccine (really a brain-changing virus) to “vaccinate” people against being religious (i.e. being “fundamentalists”) by destroying the part of the brain the pentagon scientists thought is responsible for it, as shown in this leaked video (which incidentally got the leaker a jail sentence based on faked charges for doing so).

    See the arrogance on display by these people who are “playing God” themselves by secretly arranging to damage millions of people’s brains with a “vaccine” without their consent. This is obviously extremely typical of “medical research” behind the scenes. As noted in the video comments, people who are aware of their higher nature are harder to control compared to a zombie-like bunch of scared sheep who will run to the government to “help” them with more drugs and vaccines, which they are grateful for because they are “almost free” if covered by their insurance, and that’s the main thing, isn’t it? And their children’s teeth are safe too because of fluoride!

    The truth is that if you analyze the studies that do show a reduction in cavities, there is also a corresponding delay in the eruption of teeth because one of the many things fluoride does to screw up the body is to stop teeth coming through when they should. If there are less teeth in children’s mouths, of course they aren’t going to have as many cavities because there aren’t as many teeth to decay! Take that into account and there is ZERO benefit from fluoride. But the idiots who did the studies did not consider if that were a factor and confidently “proved” that fluoridation stops decay. It has also been described as a “smart molecule” that “homes in” on teeth only and won’t affect anything else like all the bones and organs that it damages, especially the brain, although the entire adult population is forcibly medicated for life even though all teeth but wisdom teeth are formed by about 12.

    Their governments also tell them that aspartame, glyphosate and GMOs are safe, no vaccine has ever harmed anyone, there is no danger from EMF radiation, all alternative health is “quackery”, “mental health” screening is necessary to get maximum numbers of their own population destroyed and killed by psychiatry, and they are not dumping massive amounts of aluminum, barium and strontium on them everyday from the air to kill them off via Alzheimer’s Disease and brain cancer.

    The New Zealand parliament’s performance on geoengineering:

    Their citizens did actually elect that bunch of brain-dead or pure evil imbeciles. And when they get any type of cancer, their government will tell them that getting injected with mustard gas, being burnt alive with radiation and having parts of their bodies hacked off and out is the only way to treat it, while it was probably caused by them allowing whole industries to exist that make money by dumping pollution into the environment after bribing governments to allow them to (sodium fluoride being dumped straight into the water supply is one example, which is of course also a carcinogen plus lots of other horrible things – it would be against domestic and international law to dump it anywhere, but if an agency of government “buys” it from industry at taxpayers’ expense, it is now a “product” and thus legal to use to “improve children’s teeth”).

    Yes. Trust your government. Trust your doctor. Become another human sacrifice. Most people are so mind-controlled they will believe virtually anything they are told, as long as it’s “official”, and get very angry if anyone contradicts what their beloved authorities have told them, which they have been trained to revere from the earliest possible age even though they are clearly trying to murder them in every possible hidden-in-plain-sight way they can come up with under the guise of “helping them”, instead of listening to their own inner knowing which is all they really need. After all, the word “government” literally means “mind control” in Latin ( ). But if you think there is an agenda for “mind control” by your “government”, you are a “conspiracy theorist”.

    By the way, in the “New Order of Barbarians” lecture of March 20 1969, Dr Richard Day stated that almost all cancers had already been cured and that the cures were being hidden on file in the Rockefeller Institute, but that seeing as the world was already grossly overpopulated, letting people die of cancer was “a good thing to do”, and that their treatments would focus on “comfort” instead of cure, while their biggest fear was other people finding their hidden cures independently. They have since spent over $500 billion ( ) trying to “find a cure” since Nixon “officially” declared “War on Cancer” in 1971, with overall survival rates unchanged since 1965. Thanks guys. And when people get chemo (mustard gas) injections, they report it’s like being hit in the head with a semi-trailer. That’s NWO-style comfort for you.

    And back to “FunVax” – they are now toying with SPRAYING EVERYONE with it and other vaccines from the air, as well as putting them in food, water, insects, cars, clothing and toothpaste:

    But no. There’s no conspiracy by governments to control people.

  14. Sonja says:

    Yes, I’m sure you’re absolutely correct that THE COMMITTEE HAS ALREADY MADE UP ITS MIND and the ‘public consultation’ is only for show. Typical of governments – and happened here in Australia before they brought in their coercive “No Jab, No Pay” legislation which denies parents various social benefits and childcare payments unless their children are fully vaccinated. And as with the submissions about fluoridation in NZ, the vast majority of the many submissions were against the legislation – and had very good arguments backed by science.

    Absolutely criminal – not to mention stupid – because these idiots will be poisoning their own family and friends as well. Even if they get whole of house RO filters, they’ll still be exposed to fluoride every time they consume foods and drinks processed with fluoridated water, or eat out. Add that to the toxic overload they’re already being exposed to, and for some people this could be ‘the last straw’ for their health.

  15. Free Your Mind says:

    Here are the government scientists and their fake news lackeys in New Zealand and Australia doing their Ministry of Truth jobs:

    ‘A high-level panel has found “no adverse effects” of fluoridation of public water supplies, following a review of scientific evidence.’

    ‘The massive flaw in this reasoning is that there is simply no evidence of harm coming to anyone from water fluoridation.’

    ‘The Health Minister is warning that an anti-fluoridation group which has its sights on ridding Auckland of fluoride in its water is running an “organised campaign of misinformation”… On TVNZ’s Q+A programme yesterday, the minister, Tony Ryall, said there was no doubt science pointed to the fact that there were benefits for families from fluoridation, and that the levels of fluoridation in water were safe for New Zealanders.’

    ‘”Scientists” don’t say that fluoride has a negative effect. I love it in my drinking water.’


    A1 Fluoride exposure disrupts the synthesis of collagen and leads to the breakdown of collagen in bone, tendon, muscle, skin, cartilage, lungs, kidney and trachea.

    A.K. Susheela and Mohan Jha, “Effects of Fluoride on Cortical and Cancellous Bone Composition”, IRCS Medical Sciences: Library Compendium, Vol 9, No.11, pp.1021-1022 (1981);
    Y.D. Sharma, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Collagen Cross-Link Precursors”, Toxicological Letters, Vol.10, pp97-100 (1982);
    A.K. Susheela and D. Mukerjee, “Fluoride poisoning and the Effect of Collagen Biosynthesis of Osseous and Nonosseous Tissue”, Toxicological European Research, Vol 3, No.2, pp. 99-104 (1981);
    Y.D. Sharma, “Variations in the Metabolism and Maturation of Collagen after Fluoride Ingestion”, Biochemica et Biophysica Acta, Vol 715, pp.137-141 (1982);
    Marian Drozdz et al., “Studies on the Influence of Fluoride Compounds upon Connective Tissue Metabolism in Growing Rats” and “Effect of Sodium Fluoride With and Without Simultaneous Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride on Collagen Metabolism”, Journal of Toxicological Medicine, Vol. 4, pp.151-157 (1984).

    A2 “Fluorides are general protoplasma poisons, with the capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by inhibiting certain enzymes. Sources of fluoride intoxication include drinking water containing 1ppm or more of fluorine.”
    Journal of the American Medical Association, September 18, 1943.

    A3 Fluoride stimulates granule formation and oxygen consumption in white blood cells, but inhibits these processes when the white blood cell is challenged by a foreign agent in the blood.

    Robert A. Clark, “Neutrophil Iodintion Reaction Induced by Fluoride: Implications for Degranulation and Metabolic Activation,” Blood, Vol 57, pp.913-921 (1981).

    A4 Fluoride depletes the energy reserves and the ability of white blood cells to properly destroy foreign agents by the process of phagocytosis.

    A5 As little as 0.2 ppm fluoride stimulates superoxide production in resting white blood cells, virtually abolishing phagocytosis. Even micro-molar amounts of fluoride, below 1ppm, may seriously depress the ability of white blood cells to destroy pathogenic agents.

    John Curnette, et al, “Fluoride-mediated Activation of the Respiratory Burst in Human Neutrophils”, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Vol 63, pp.637-647 (1979);
    W.L. Gabler and P.A. Leong, ., “Fluoride Inhibition of Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes”, Journal of Dental Research, Vo. 48, No. 9, pp.1933-1939 (1979);
    W.L. Gabler, et al., “Effect of Fluoride on the
    Kinetics of Superoxide Generation by Fluoride”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 64, p.281 (1985);
    A.S. Kozlyuk, et al., “Immune Status of Children in Chemically Contaminated Environments”, Zdravookhranenie, Issue 3, pp.6-9 (1987);

    A6 Fluoride confuses the immune system and causes it to attack the body’s own tissues, and increases the tumour growth rate in cancer prone individuals.

    Alfred Taylor and Nell C. Taylor, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Tumour Growth”, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, Vol 119,p.252 (1965);
    Sheila Gibson, “Effects of Fluoride on Immune System Function”, Complementary Medical Research, Vol 6, pp.111-113 (1992);
    Peter Wilkinson, “Inhibition of the Immune System With Low Levels of Fluorides”, Testimony before the Scottish High Court in Edinburgh in the Case of McColl vs. Strathclyde Regional Council, pp. 17723-18150, 19328-19492, and Exhibit 636, (1982);
    D.W. Allman and M.Benac, “Effect of Inorganic Fluoride Salts on Urine and Cyclic AMP Concentration in Vivo”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol 55 (Supplement B), p.523 (1976);
    S. Jaouni and D.W. Allman, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride and Aluminium on Adenylate Cyclase and Phosphodiesterase Activity”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol.64, p.201 (1985)

    A7 Fluoride inhibits antibody formation in the blood.

    S.K. Jain and A.K. Susheela, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Antibody Formation in Rabbits”, Environmental Research, Vol.44, pp.117-125 (1987).

    A8 Fluoride depresses thyroid activity.

    Viktor Gorlitzer Von Mundy, “Influence of Fluorine and Iodine on the Metabolism, Particularly on the Thyroid Gland,” Muenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift, Vol 105, pp182-186 (1963);
    A. Benagiano, “The Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Thyroid Enzymes and Basal Metabolism in the Rat”, Annali Di Stomatologia, Vol 14, pp.601-619n (1965);
    Donald Hillman, et al., “Hypothyroidism and Anemia Related to Fluoride in Dairy Cattle,” Journal of Dairy Science, Vol 62, No.3, pp.416-423 (1979);
    V. Stole and J. Podoba, “Effect of Fluoride on the Biogenesis of Thyroid Hormones”, Nature, Vol 188, No.4753, pp.855-856 (1960);
    Pierre Galleti and Gustave Joyet, “Effect of Fluorine on Thyroid Iodine Metabolism and Hyperthyroidism”, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 18, pp.1102-1110 (1958).

    A9 Fluorides have a disruptive effect on various tissues in the body.

    T.Takamorim “The Heart Changes in Growing Albino Rats Fed on Varied Contents of Fluorine,” The Toxicology of Fluorine, Symposium, Bern, Switzerland, Oct 1962, pp.125-129;
    Vilber A.O. Bello and Hillel J. Gitelman, “High Fluoride Exposure in Hemodialysis Patients”, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 15, pp.320-324 (1990);
    Y.Yoshisa, “Experimental Studies on Chronic Fluorine Poisoning”, Japanese Journal of Industrial Health, Vol 1, pp.683-690 (1959).

    A10 Fluoride promotes development of bone cancer.

    J.K. Mauer, et al., “Two-year carcinogenicity study of sodium fluoride in rats”, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol 82, pp1118-1126 (1990);
    Proctor and Gamble “Carcinogencity studies with Sodium Fluoride in rats” National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Presentation, July 27, 1985;
    S.E. Hurdley et al., “Drinking Water Fluoridation and Osteosarcoma” Canadian Journal of Public Health, Vol 81, pp.415-416 (1990);
    P.D. Cohn, ” A Brief Report on the Association of Drinking Water Fluoridation and Incidence of Osteosarcoma in Young Males”, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey, Nov 1992;
    M.C. Mahoney et al.,”Bone Cancer Incidence Rates in New York”, American Journal of Public Health, Vol 81, pp.81, 475 (1991);
    Irwin Herskowitz and Isabel Norton, “Increased Incidence of Melanotic Tumors Following Treatment with Sodium Fluoride”, Genetics Vol 48, pp.307-310 (1963);
    J.A. Disney, et al., ” A Case Study in Testing the Conventional Wisdom;
    School-Based Fluoride Mouthrinse Programs in the USA” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, Vol 18, pp.46-56 (1990);
    D.J. Newell, “Fluoridation of Water Supplies and Cancer – an association?”, Applied Statistics, Vol 26, No.2, pp.125-135 (1977). See also .
    “In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other chemical”: Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus, US National Cancer Institute, cit .

    A11 Fluorides cause premature aging of the human body.

    Nicholas Leone, et al., “Medical Aspects of Excessive Fluoride in a Water Supply”, Public Health Reports, Vol 69, pp.925-936 (1954);
    J. David Erikson, “Mortality of Selected Cities with Fluoridated and Non-Fluoridated Water Supplies”, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 298, pp.1112-1116 (1978);
    “The Village Where People are Old Before their Time”, Stern
    Magazine, Vol 30, pp.107-108,111-112 (1978)

    A12 Fluoride ingestion from mouth rinses and dentifrices in children is extremely hazardous to biological development, life span and general health.

    Yngve Ericsson and Britta Forsman, “Fluoride retained from mouth rinses and dentifrices in preschool children”, Caries Research, Vol.3, pp.290-299 (1969);
    W.L. Augenstein, et al., “Fluoride ingestion in children: a review of 87 cases”, Pediatrics, Vol 88, pp.907-912, (1991);
    Charles Wax, “Field Investigation report”, State of Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, March 19, 1980, 67pp;
    George Waldbott, “Mass Intoxication from Over-Fluoridation in Drinking Water”, Clinical Toxicology, Vol 18, No.5, pp.531-541 (1981).

    A13 Fluorides diminish the intelligence capability of the human brain.

    X.S.Li et al, Fluoride, Vol 26, No.4, pp.189-192, 1995, “Effect of Fluoride Exposure on Intelligence In Children”. Presented to the 20th Conference of the International Society for Fluoride Research, Beijing, China, September 5-9, 1994.

    A14 Fluoride studies in rats may be indicative of a potential for motor disruption, intelligence deficits and learning disabilities in humans.

    A15 Humans are exposed to plasma levels of fluoride as high as those in rat studies. Fluoride involves interruption of normal brain development. Fluoride affects the hippocampus in the brain, which integrates inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational stimuli, to produce behavioural decisions and modify memory. Experience with other developmental neurotoxicants prompts expectations that changes in behavioural functions will be comparable across species, especially humans and rats.

    Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Vol 17, No,2, p.176, “Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats”, Muellenix, Denbesten, Schunior, Kernan, 1995.

    A16 Fluorides accumulate in the brain over time to reach neurologically harmful levels.

    Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Vol 17, No,2, p.176, “Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats”, Muellenix, Denbesten, Schunior, Kernan, 1995.

    A17 “Drinking water containing as little as 1.2 ppm fluoride will cause developmental disturbances. We cannot run the risk of producing such serious systemic disturbances. The potentialities for harm outweigh those for good.”

    Journal of the American Dental Association, Editorial, October 1, 1944.

    A18 The contents of a family-size tube of fluoridated toothpaste is enough to kill a 25-pound child.

    In 1991, the Akron (Ohio) Regional Poison Center reported that “death has been reported following ingestion of 16mg/kg of fluoride. Only 1/10 of an ounce of fluoride could kill a 100 pound adult. According to the centre, “fluoride toothpaste contains up to 1mg/gram of fluoride.” Even Proctor and Gamble, the makers of Crest, acknowledge that a family-sized tube “theoretically contains enough fluoride to kill a small child.” (National Pure Water Association, UK).

    A19 Fluorides have been used to modify behaviour and mood of human beings.

    “It is a little known fact that fluoride compounds were added to the drinking water of prisoners to keep them docile and inhibit questioning of authority, both in Nazi prison camps in World War 2 and in the Soviet gulags in Siberia.” (National Pure Water Association, UK).

    A20 Fluorides are medically categorized as protoplasmic poisons, which is why they are used to kill rodents.

    The Journal of the American Medical Association on September 18, 1943, states, “fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, changing the permeability of the cell membrane by inhibiting certain enzymes. The exact mechanism of such actions are obscure.”.

    A21 Fluoride consumption by human beings increases the general cancer death rate.

    In 1975 Dr John Yiamouyiannis published a preliminary survey which showed that people in fluoridated areas have a higher cancer death rate than those in non-fluoridated areas. The National Cancer Institute attempted to refute the studies. Later in 1975, Yiamouyiannis joined with Dr Dean Burk, chief chemist of the National Cancer Institute (1939-1974) in performing other studies which were then included in the Congressional Record by Congressman Delaney, who was the original author of the Delaney Amendment, which prohibited the addition of cancer-causing substances to food used for human consumption.

    Both reports confirmed the existence of a link between fluoridation and cancer. (Note: Obviously Dr Burk felt free to agree with scientific findings only after his tenure at NCI ended, since his job depended on toeing the party line).

    Research carried out at Boston University School of Public Health, using data from the Irish National Cancer Registry and its Northern Ireland equivalent, found 40% more people suffer from the rare bone cancer osteosarcoma in the heavily-fluoridated Irish Republic than in Northern Ireland, where water is not fluoridated. See .

    A22 Fluorides have little or no effect on decay prevention in humans.

    In 1990 Dr John Colquhoun was forced into early requirement in New Zealand after he conducted a study on 60,000 school children and found no difference in tooth decay between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas. He additionally found that a substantial number of children in fluoridated areas suffered from dental fluorosis. He made the study public. In 1998 he summarised the reasons for opposition to fluoridation. You can read them at: or in FLUORIDE 31(2), 1998, pp 103-118.

    A23 “It has long been known that excessive fluoride intake carries serious toxic effects. But scientists are now debating whether fluoride confers any benefit at all. … Fluoride inhibits enzymes that breed acid-producing oral bacteria whose acid eats away tooth enamel. This observation is valid, but some scientists now believe that the harmful impact of fluoride on other useful enzymes far outweighs the beneficial effect on caries prevention.”

    UNICEF, .

    In 1989 a study by Hildebolt et al on 6,000 school children contradicted any alleged benefit from the use of sodium fluorides.

    In 1990 a study by Dr. John Yiamouyiannis on 39,000 school children contradicted any alleged benefits from the use of sodium fluorides.

    In 1992 Michael Perrone, a legislative assistant in New Jersey, contacted the FDA requesting all information regarding the safety and effectiveness of fluoride tablets and drops. After 6 months of stalling, the FDA admitted they had no data to show that fluoride tablets or drops were either safe or effective. They informed Perrone that they would “probably have to pull the tablets and drops off the market.”

    A24 The fact that fluoride toothpastes and school-based mouth rinses are packaged in aluminium accentuates the effect on the body.

    In 1976, Dr DW Allman and co-workers from Indiana University School of Medicine fed animals 1 part per million (ppm) of fluoride and found that in the presence of aluminium in a concentration as small as 20 parts per billion, (like in a toothpaste tube, using aluminium pans to boil water, or drinking beverages in aluminium cans), fluoride was able to cause an even larger increase in cyclic AMP levels.

    Cyclic AMP inhibits the migration rate of white blood cells, as well as the ability of the white blood cell to destroy pathogenic organisms. Ref: Journal of Dental Research, Vol 55, Sup B, p523, 1976, “Effect of Inorganic Fluoride Salts on Urine and Tissue Cyclic AMP Concentration in Vivo”.

    A25 “Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time.”

    Robert Carton, Ph.D., former U.S. EPA scientist, on “Marketplace” Canadian Broadcast Company Nov 24, 1992.

    A26 “Regarding fluoridation, the EPA should act immediately to protect the public, not just on the cancer data, but on the evidence of bone fractures, arthritis, mutagenicity and other effects”

    William Marcus PhD, senior EPA toxicologist, Covert Action, Fall 1992, p.66.

    A27 Fluoride interacts with alum in drinking water to cause brain and kidney damage.

    “Chronic administration of aluminium-fluoride or sodium-fluoride to rats in drinking water: alterations in neuronal and cerebrovascular integrity”: Varner, J.A., Jensen, K.F., Horvath, W. And Isaacson, R.L. Brain Research 784 284-298 (1998) and cited in Fluoride Journal, FLUORIDE 31(2), 1998, pp 91-95.

    A28 Chemicals added to water, including fluoride, cause Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

    Professor A.K. Susheela and her scientific colleagues at the Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation found that Irritable Bowel Syndrome, also known as non-ulcer dyspepsia, colitis, ‘spastic colon’ or Crohn’s Disease can be caused (or exacerbated) by intake of chemically treated drinking water. Biopsy results of the adverse effects on gastric cells are shown in surprisingly detailed electron micrographs. Professor Susheela and her co-workers discovered that chemically-induced IBS can be successfully reversed without medication simply by avoiding water and products containing the chemical. (See ).


    If people just saw the evidence, those above could never get away with what they do. The last thing these people will ever allow is a debate with anyone who knows the facts. Instead, they just call them names in public and never let any such person on television in an open argument because they would lose. But most people will just see their simplistic statements and assume that because they are “experts” they must be telling the truth. A “distinguished panel of scientific experts” can make virtually anything true in the public’s mind.

    “It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.” – Joseph Goebbels

    “I like fluoride, everyone likes fluoride, my grandmother didn’t have fluoride and all her teeth were rotten, you’re a tinfoil-hat-conspiracy-theorist-lunatic, do you want me to call the police and have you locked up in a psych ward? Come on, the Chief Dental Officer said it’s safe, do you really think you know more than him? Now shut up and let’s talk about something interesting. How’s the football? Do you think so-and-so’s knee is going to keep him out this week? Let’s talk about that for the next four hours, then go to the game, then get wasted all night.”

    ‘Another comment that was repeated from time to time… this particularly in relation to changing laws and customs… and specific changes… he said, “Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people; and second, is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it.” Frequently he would say, “There is just no other way. There’s just no other way!” This seemed to come as a sort of an apology, particularly when at the conclusion of describing some particularly offensive changes.’ – from “New Order of Barbarians” lecture, March 20 1969.

    Sometimes though, public officials will simply murder many thousands of innocent people in an extremely brazen and obvious way by lying their heads off with no discernible “ostensible” purpose at all. This one below is a very nasty example:

    It is safe to assume that everything a government or their media mouthpieces say is a lie. You could very well die if you do not.

  16. Rodney Wilson says:

    Unlike the U.S., New Zealand is not a federation, and does not have a federal government. It has only a national government, and local bodies.

  17. NICK BROOK says:

    Whenever funding is sought for programs of social uplift, this government is quick to resort to statements denouncing a
    “Nanny State”
    How then do they justify spending public money on “looking after everybody’s teeth” when it’s common knowledge you’ll get more than enough fluoride if you just brush daily?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *