Psychiatric fascism: notes from the underground

by Jon Rappoport

November 12, 2015

(To join our email list, click here.)

These are wide-ranging quotes from my work-in-progress, The Underground. They take up the subject of psychiatry, the absurd pseudoscience licensed by the State.

“Since there are no definitive physical tests for any of the 300 officially certified mental disorders—no blood tests, no urine tests, no brain scans, no genetic assays—what we’re left with is a phantasm-map of Nowhere Land, a philosophy of limitation. A translation of human problems and suffering into a professional liar’s language, a made-up nonsensical technical gibberish. And the federal government licenses this as a monopoly.”

“Whenever you come across a pseudoscience, you’re looking at a mask that covers an ideology. And that ideology intends to limit freedom, the free person, the free soul, the free mind, the free psyche, the free creative impulse.”

“Modern psychiatry is an updated version of the CIA’s MKULTRA mind-control program, adjusted for the masses.”

“Psychiatry is basically a mechanism to control people who are dissatisfied, disaffected, rebellious, independent, thoughtful; and then, secondarily, a mechanism to control those who just want to surrender their lives to an external authority and can’t believe in religion anymore. Instead of a priest and a church, they have drugs.”

“If Huxley’s Brave New World is the mountaintop of controlled society, with its genetic manipulations and laboratory births, psychiatry is its ancestor, rambling around in the foothills, pretending to define so-called mental disorders, handing out toxic drugs, giving people electric shocks, performing lobotomies. Psychiatry is the crazy grandfather.”

“Psychiatry is a system of arbitrary definitions. When you get past all the pseudo-technical nonsense, you’re looking at mind control—the attempt to make people believe consciousness is composed of 300 disorders.”

“Psychiatry is a state-of-mind prison for society. You can have this state of mind or that one, and after we treat you, you can have a normal state of mind.”

“But, actually, consciousness is up for grabs. You can have any state of mind you want to. No labels. Does that sound frightening? You’re supposed to feel frightened and crawl back into a little hole. That’s the game.”

“Psychiatry is just another organized religion. Instead of a wafer and a sip of wine, they have drugs. Lots of drugs. Their cosmology is a picture they paint, the subject of which is a paradise called Normal. Sane. Average. By their average definitions.”

“Psychiatry would like to be known as some kind of ultimate information theory. But information theory is what the loser in a poker game is left with. It’s all he’s got, so he has to go out on the street and try to sell it, hypnotize people with it. Pure scrubbed data, as empty and dead as the face of an old politician.”

“Today’s psychiatrists are playing around with brain signals. They have no idea what the mind is. No idea what consciousness is. No idea what freedom is. They have no idea how different individuals would be from one another if they broke out of the collective prison of The Normal.”

“The Wizard of Psychiatry is a hustler from way back. His job is to make Normal plausible.”

“Everything a human being is starts to come into view when he gets rid of Normal.”

“Psychiatry and its government, media, and intelligence-agency allies are saying, ‘See that crazy killer over there? Anybody could turn into that. Even you. So we have to treat the whole population before somebody starts spraying bullets in your neighborhood. We have to sculpt everybody into a good citizen, an average person.’”

“Psychiatry is the Surveillance Society of the brain. The NSA with toxic drugs.”

“Psychiatry is State control of emotion and thought. And its poor cousin, psychology, has become sentimental hokum for the rubes. Slop.”

“At the bottom of his titanic pile of nonsense, the Wizard of Psychiatry is saying, ‘You’re not free.’ But you are.”

“Sixty years ago, a hundred years ago, there was an idea in America. The Open Road. Travel the open road. Adventure. Psychiatry is one of the disciplines that’s tried to shut it down.”

“There never was, and never will be, a science of consciousness, because by its very nature, consciousness is free and unpredictable. Many people find this hard to swallow, because they fear freedom and hate it. They know they’ve lost it somewhere, and they don’t want anyone else to have it.”

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

“We live in a wilderness of bad poetry and overblown sentimental attachments. Or to put it another way, more and more people are attaching themselves to heraldic promises of salvation and rescue from their problems and the problems of the world. The theme is constant: some thing, some force, some being, some power is going to appear and change the world. This is entitlement on a grand scale. At the core it’s surrender of self and surrender of creative power. ‘I want to read the book of my life, I don’t want to write it.’”

“Psychiatry is the action of painting false pictures inside the mind, and obtaining obedience to those images. It’s imposed reality-invention. Meanwhile, under the tons of false information and propaganda that pervade life, the individual is, in fact, intensely creative; he is perfectly capable of inventing and fleshing out his own reality.”

“The real future, the future people run away and hide from, isn’t one state or condition or cosmology. It’s open. It’s the paralleling and intersecting of millions and millions of realities consciously invented by free individuals. No one can predict what this looks like. It isn’t a system. It isn’t an overall design. It isn’t a planned society. It has zero value for the meddlers who fervently believe in one unified shape.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Journey into the unknown

Journey into the unknown

~a short story~

by Jon Rappoport

November 11, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Citizen John Q Jones was flagged by NetSquid. Agents approached him outside his apartment and brought him into a small room at Inquiry Headquarters.

Jones sat in a small chair and waited. After an hour, a man in a suit walked in and sat down across from him.

“I’m Inquiry Specialist Washburn, Mr. Jones,” he said. “We’ve picked up some odd chatter from you.”

“Where?” Jones said.

Washburn: On your computer. You’re apparently writing an essay.

Jones: Something wrong with that?

Washburn: In it, you mention the word “unknown,”

Jones: Yes? So?

Washburn: The word, as you’re using it, doesn’t fit normal contexts.

Jones: How could it? Unknown means unknown.

Washburn: Yes, but the latest official definition pertains to “that which hasn’t yet been reduced to a precise reference, according to pre-established sociological parameters and algorithms.”

Jones: You lost me.

Washburn: Something can only be called unknown if it is “on the way to being known.”

Jones: That seems absurd.

Washburn: To you, perhaps. But that’s why you’re here. You must be aware that, these days, the very concept of a planned society involves the elimination of so-called imponderables.

Jones: Could you repeat that?

Washburn: The underlying principle of “the greatest good for the greatest number of people” must be adhered to. Therefore, when we see an event or an idea which falls into a gray area, which is vague, we try our best to clarify it, in order to decide whether it does, in fact, align with the underlying principle.

Jones: I must be missing something. I’m still in the dark.

Washburn: Mr. Jones, I hope you’re not pretending to be confused. Society is an organization. Planning how it will operate depends on defining a series of “knowns.” When a so-called “unknown” enters the scene, we investigate it for possible problems.

Jones: Sounds pretty abstract.

Washburn: Not at all. Think of a game like chess. All the pieces have defined functions. If you suddenly introduced a new piece with new functions, the whole game would change. The State must guard against that.

Jones: But how does my mere mention of the word “unknown” pose a potential threat?

Washburn: It poses a threat because we don’t understand what you mean by it.

Jones: I might be throwing a monkey wrench into the smooth operation of a machine?

Washburn: I wouldn’t put it that way, but all right, yes.

Jones: So when I say “unknown,” I might be going outside your parameters. I might be referring to something outside the boundaries of the State.

Washburn: You might be, yes. That’s why we’re here. To inquire into this possibility. So why don’t you tell me, now, what you mean when you use the word “unknown.”

Jones: I mean that which hasn’t yet been created.

Washburn: Created by whom?

Jones: By anyone.

Washburn: By an individual?

Jones: Yes.

Washburn: That’s a Section 32 violation. What you call “creating” is done by groups, not individuals.

Jones: Since when?

Washburn: Since June 4th, 2051, when the President signed the new Budget bill into law. Section 32 specifies the psychological basis for innovation.

Jones: How can a law affect the way things are?

Washburn: That all depends on what the definition of “are” is.

Jones: In my essay, I give great attention to the fact that the individual has the power to invent something new and unprecedented, something no one could have predicted—something “unknown” before it came into being. I call this the prime factor.

Washburn: And you seem to be celebrating this notion.

Jones: It’s not a notion. It’s the way life works, and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

Washburn: Are you sure about that? Imagine what would happen if every person believed you, and took action based on that belief. We would have sheer chaos. Do you think the State would just stand by and watch such madness?

Jones: I think the State, such as it is now, would begin to undergo a great change.

Washburn: Yes, exactly. And that is why we can’t allow things to move in the direction you prescribe.

Jones: You should welcome the unknown.

Washburn: It would cripple every predictive model we have.

Jones: “The unknown is the greatest aspect of existence.” I wrote that.

Washburn: Where did you get such an idea?

Jones: I don’t think I got it from anywhere. One day it occurred to me. What is as yet unformed in the imagination is much greater than anything that has yet happened in our entire history. That was the idea.

Washburn: But you’re not referring to the collective imagination.

Jones: I don’t think the collective imagination exists. It’s a fairy tale. Imagination belongs to the individual.

Washburn: Do you realize the potential danger of these ideas?

Jones: No, I don’t.

Washburn: You define “unknown” as a potential that exists in the imagination.

Jones: I do.

Washburn: The State directs imagination, so it moves toward the achievement of prescribed goals.

Jones: Can I quote you on that?

Washburn: Please, don’t be frivolous. This is a serious matter. You could be charged with a crime.

Jones: Would I have my day in open court?

Washburn: For the class of felonies we’re discussing here, you would appear before a judge in a private chamber. He would interview you and pass sentence.

Jones: A guilty verdict is preordained?

Washburn: In a planned society, some offenses are obvious and irreversible. There is no need to argue the outcome.

Jones: So what do you want me to do?

Washburn: Recant your essay.

Jones: It isn’t even finished. I haven’t published any part of it.

Washburn: You have to make a sign of good faith.

Jones: Let me make this clear: I have faith in the imagination and creative force of the free individual.

Washburn: …There might be one way out of your problem.

Jones: What is it?

Washburn: Register with the State as a 501c non-profit church. At that point, your beliefs would be protected by the Constitution.

Jones: Really.

Washburn: Yes. Of course, you would have to say your core ideas come from God or The Universe or some other higher being whom you’re channeling.

Jones: I don’t like the sound of that.

Washburn: You would be granted a license as a minister of a religious organization.

Jones: I have no interest in becoming a minister.

Washburn: The State would monitor your operation closely. We would apply surveillance to determine what we call the Passivity Index, in your flock.

Jones: Meaning what?

Washburn: The thrust of your preaching must bring about a high level of surrender and passivity among your members.

Jones: But the whole idea of individual creative force moves in the opposite direction.

Washburn: I understand. However, when you combine that idea with God, gods, prophets, whatever, the overall effect should induce “passive enthusiasm.” In other words, people are inspired by your message but they don’t do anything about it.

Jones: I become an entertainer.

Washburn: You said it. I didn’t.

exit from the matrix

Jones: You know, I used to teach at a university.

Washburn: Yes, Yale. We have your records. In your eighth year, during a small seminar, you used the word “she” six times. Your students protested against the offensive gender-based pronoun, which had been outlawed by the College Council. You wouldn’t back down.

Jones: I wrote a defense of my position for the College newspaper. Before that edition was printed or the essay could go online, the paper was shut down. Nevertheless, I was dragged into a student court and charged with “emotional hijacking.” I don’t even know what that means.

Washburn: The massive student protests across America, in those days, were a precursor to the bundle of heroic Equality laws passed by Congress. “Equal emotions, equal treatment.”

Jones: Another term whose meaning completely escapes me.

Washburn: You’re a chronic outlier, Mr. Jones. I’m offering you a way out of your mess. Join us. Be part of us. We’re the solution.

Jones: C9sr1574gt6789bd.

Washburn: Excuse me?

Jones: That’s a piece of verbal code. A colleague once passed it along to me. I’m betting you’re responding to it.

Washburn: What?

Jones: It eliminates oppositional speech in androids. Non-humans. Machines designed to look like humans.

Silence.

More silence.

More silence.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Why consciousness “must be an illusion”

Why consciousness “must be an illusion”

by Jon Rappoport

November 10, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

As my readers know, I’ve tackled this subject from a number of angles. (See also here.)

Conventional physics has painted itself into a corner, because it assumes that all sub-atomic particles (the constituents of the brain and the universe) contain no awareness whatsoever.

Therefore, there is no reason to assume that consciousness exists. The idea that it does must be an illusion, a misnomer, a groundless superstition, a holdover from a more primitive time.

And yet, there you are, right now, reading these words, and more importantly, you are conscious of the fact that you’re reading these words.

So you must be crazy, the victim of an illusion. You must be the end-user of a stream of thought over which you have no control—a stream that “tells you” you’re conscious…in the same way a voice in your head might tell you you’re living on the moon right now.

And if you multiply this unfortunate situation by about eight billion, you have a madhouse of a planet where everyone automatically assumes they’re conscious, whereas, in fact, no one is. Everyone is a machine responding to stimuli, some of which are prompting you to say, “I’m conscious”—an entirely meaningless statement.

And if you buy all that, I have golf course memberships for sale on Jupiter.

Conventional physics has painted itself into a corner, and wants to be in that corner, because admitting there is such a thing as consciousness is tantamount to admitting that a major component of life, the major component of life, is outside any analysis of matter and energy, since it, consciousness, is not made out of matter or energy.

All sorts of drug researchers would chime in at this point: “But we knew that chemicals change consciousness by affecting the brain. Therefore, the brain is the seat of all consciousness.”

As usual, they miss the point. The fact of being conscious, regardless of the particular state, is independent of those chemicals.

Whether you’re aware of seeing buildings on a street or green writhing polka-dot creatures directing traffic, you are the one who is aware. You’re the one who knows you’re seeing buildings or creatures.

Now we’re really in deep water, because, you see, you’re not supposed to exist at all. You’re supposed to be a brain. You’re supposed to be a few trillion neurons clicking and ticking. You’re supposed to be, at best, “someone who thinks he’s someone,” or rather, “no one who thinks he’s someone.”

“Hi, I’m no one who thinks he’s someone.”

“Hi. Me too. Let’s do whatever our brains are making us do, since we can’t have freedom—another illusion.”

“Sounds good. Where do we start?”

“We wait for instructions. In the meantime, I have beer, wine, or sparkling water.”

If it occurs to you that this mechanistic view of life has some uses for those who are highly interested in mind control, you’re right. “Waiting for instructions” would be an ideal state for the reception of programming. Freedom, on the other hand, would be a non-starter.

“Test subject 465-A believes he is free. His illusion is interfering with the insertion of our package of beliefs…”

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the armies of “rational people,” who are quite sure that a rejection of all-out scientific materialism would suddenly put them in the camp of religionists. They see no other alternatives. It’s either science or a church.

Well, that’s their problem. They can only entertain two possibilities. They reveal a distinct lack of imagination.

And I suppose I should also say a word about “the DNA people.” They’re utterly convinced that DNA creates consciousness. But DNA is matter, and according to the same scientists who research the whole genetic puzzle, matter is composed of tiny particles or waves that display no sign of consciousness.

Now, admitting that what I’m writing here won’t find its way into any TED talks (the source of all cutting-edge wisdom on the planet), I should point out that the issue of consciousness has been plaguing philosophers in the West ever since the onslaught of science and technology at the end of the 19th century. And in time-honored fashion, philosophers have opted for their favorite strategy: ignore the problem, pretend it doesn’t exist, claim the problem itself is based on a confusion about…anything. About language, for example. Language, as (mis)constructed, contains words that indicate the existence of meaningless objects (like consciousness). There, all done, move along, nothing to see here.

Finally, we have another bunch of people who would happily report: “Scientists miss the mark. The brain and the universe are made out of particles that do, in fact, possess consciousness. ‘Everything is conscious.’”

They say that, and for some interesting reason, they avoid saying that the individual, the You, the non-machine non-material You, has consciousness.

They only want to posit collective consciousness. That’s their tune. They keep singing it. And if you listen to the words, they are, in their own way, trying to erase the whole notion of the individual.

Why? Because the most basic form of mind control involves denying that the individual exists. If they can put that one over, if they can sell it, they can push an agenda of: The Group is All.

This resonates quite nicely with the way the world is shaping up these days. Or rather, being shaped up. On purpose.

In case you hadn’t noticed.

Among the endless number of states of consciousness, there is certainly a collective version. The individual can enter it, and he can exit it. It’s not the be-all and end-all. It’s not a permanent paradise with closed doors.

But who would notice that fact in a world where the population has bought the idea that the conscious individual doesn’t exist, and is merely a biological machine programmed this way or that way?

Our most august intellectuals are, under the surface, arguing for the machine view. They’re mixing and matching the metaphysical and the political on behalf of a Collective Hive, because the winds that carry money and prestige are blowing that way.

They’re selling the proposition that the individual, his consciousness, his freedom, and his power are delusional dust of a bygone era.

They’re using a story about science as their primary tool.

If you want to buy that ticket and take that ride, understand where it’s going to take you.

the matrix revealed

You can watch any number of talks where the speaker mentions “the ground of all being,” “collective wisdom,” “universal consciousness,” “the universe gives you permission,” and the audience snaps it up like pure sugar. It’s very interesting. Stimulus-response. Bell rings, dog drools. This is a form of programming whose time has come—if people want to surrender and drift into a passive state.

And leave behind their own individual power.

“Tonight, on the cosmological news channel, the individual isn’t conscious and doesn’t exist, the brain is all, and we’re all the same thing together. Brought to you by The Great Cheese Glob in the Sky, coming to theaters soon…”

“But first, let’s talk about Nature. As we know, we’re all part of Nature. Being an individual is a delusion that keeps us separate from Nature. And did I mention Nature? Order your manual that tells you how to think and talk about yourself as part of Nature and you’ll receive this free set of twelve dinner knives and a box of doilies reproduced from Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh’s personal collection, inscribed with his famous environmental statement: “I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus.”

A real humanitarian, the Duke is.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Is Jeb Bush the hidden clue in 2016 election?

Is Jeb Bush the hidden clue in 2016 election?

Are we seeing a replay of the 1992 election?

by Jon Rappoport

November 9, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Is Jeb Bush really a wet limp noodle, whining, complaining, saying there are “cooler” things he can do than run for President?

Or does he already know something about the outcome of the election?

For a man who obviously realized, long ago, that he was going to run for the highest office in the land, he’s certainly made a strange mess of it so far.

He’s turned himself into a little boy huddling in a corner, calling mommy, daddy, and brother for advice.

Does he think Trump, Carson, and Rubio are going to implode, after which he’ll reconstitute himself and stride into the spotlight? Or does he already know this isn’t his time?

Does he already know Hillary has been tapped, by the powers-that-be, for the Presidency?

Her team, behind the scenes, has cobbled together some 500 super-delegates, people whose votes count in the Primaries, but who aren’t subject to the results of state-by-state Primary elections.

Are we seeing a replay of what happened in the 1992 election, when Jeb’s father, President George H W Bush, went down to a very surprising defeat at the hands of another Clinton, Bill?

Before that election, according to Terry Reed and John Cummings, authors of the shocking 1994 book, Compromised, Bill was involved with the CIA in some very dirty dealings in Arkansas—and I’m not just talking about the cocaine flights landing at the Mena airport.

It seems Bill had agreed to set up CIA weapons-making factories in his home state, under the radar. But because Arkansas, when it comes to money, is all cronies all the time, everybody and his brother found out about the operation and wanted in.

This security breach infuriated the CIA, and a meeting was held to dress down Bill and make him see the error of his ways. His CIA handlers told him they were going to shut down the whole weapons operation, because Bill had screwed up royally. A screaming match ensued—but the CIA people backed off a bit and told Bill he was still “their man” for the upcoming 1992 run for the Presidency.

Of course, there are people who think Reed and Cumming’s book is fiction, but John Cummings used to be a top-notch reporter for Newsday. He co-authored the 1990 book, Goombata, about the rise and fall of John Gotti. He exposed US operations to destroy Cuban agriculture with bio-weapons. It’s highly doubtful he would have put his name on Compromised without a deep conviction he was correctly adding up the facts.

I point all this out, because it’s possible, once again, that a Clinton, in 2015, is dealing from greater inside strength than a Bush is.

And if so, perhaps Jeb is simply folding up his tent because he doesn’t want to play the game and then, in preordained fashion, lose to Hillary.

“Look Jeb, your family had two Presidents. The Clintons get two, as well.”

the matrix revealed

As I mentioned, some people believe Jeb will jump into the race with both feet when Trump and Carson fade, and he is just biding his time. But if so, he’s fiddling around on the sidelines in the worst possible way. He’s making himself look like an abject loser. His campaign coffers may be bulging, but his persona is shrinking down to the size of a teardrop.

No doubt, behind the scenes, his people are pushing negative Hillary narratives (Benghazi, her personal email server, her health), and they may have even more explosive charges in their bag. But for now, Jeb appears to be a dead star, hovering in a nowhere sky.

Does he know that elite-shaped destiny, for 2016, has already snuffed out a Bush?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

The Matrix Revealed: the beginning

The Matrix Revealed: the beginning

by Jon Rappoport

November 8, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

In 1981, a year before I started working as a journalist, I was making notes for a novel.

The title was: The Human Who Knew Everything.

The shape of the novel had morphed many times. I settled on one core idea: a human believes that nothing can surprise him.

He’s quite sure he knows everything worth knowing—and if he doesn’t, and he learns what it is, he won’t feel different, he won’t look at life in a different way.

He’s set.

In the course of the novel, he comes up against his father, whom he hasn’t seen in many years. They’ve always had a raw contentious relationship.

His father confesses that his whole life has been one long attempt to explain an experience he had during the war, on an island in the Pacific, in the middle of a battle.

The father can’t articulate it all at once. He says it changed his view of reality. This, from a man who was so set in his ways that he was sure he knew everything worth knowing.

As I continued to make notes on the novel, I remembered something my logic professor in college told me just before I graduated.

He said, “Know when you don’t know something.”

He meant, when you admit you don’t know something, you’re free; you’re free to find out what it is and learn it.

At that point, I stopped making notes and wondered what it might be like to work as a reporter, an investigator—exploring what I didn’t know.

How deep could an investigation go?

I spent the next 25 years finding out.

In the late 1980s, I met Jack True, a hypnotherapist, in Los Angeles. We began a long series of conversations, which evolved into more than a hundred formal interviews.

With his patients, Jack was on the track of something tremendous, something he called “the lock and key.”

The first time I asked him what it was, he said, “It would be the deepest kind of conditioning, programming. It’s the place where the mind and the world meet…the mind fits like a key into the world.”

And then what?

“Then,” he said, “the mind settles on accepting a certain overall range of information and space that is limited, and that range becomes a person’s reality.”

I then discovered that Jack was working with certain patients to “break the lock and key.” That was his mission.

I eventually found out how deep that process was.

I began making notes for what would become, fifteen years later, my first collection, The Matrix Revealed.

Jack and I worked on those notes together. The collaboration took us into many areas: the early creative exercises of Tibetan schools, fifteen hundred years ago; the CIA MKULTRA program; what Jack called the “time, rhythm, and pace of deep propaganda”; the strategies of political and spiritual collectivism, moving forward from ancient Egypt; and of course, the basis of hypnotic inductions and suggestions.

Through a series of synchronistic events, I met a retired propaganda operative of the first order, Ellis Medavoy (pseudonym), who had worked for several elite groups over a long career.

Ellis and I did many interviews. He explained to me, at a level I had never conceived, the nuts and bolts of massive and long-term propaganda psyops; the art of altering perception.

Through these relationships, I came to understand that, as one travels further and further into the rabbit hole, a sense of incurable optimism grows.

It stems from seeing, at a profound level, how reality is being created—and by transference, how it can be created now…not only differently, but along astonishingly different paths.

That unshakable conviction, and a corresponding long-term view of the future, informs everything I do.

Jack died in the 1990s. Ellis relocated, and hasn’t been in touch in several years. I’ll never forget what they imparted to me, and the mutual collaboration that allowed us to advance our research beyond what we thought was possible.

the matrix revealed

Here are the contents of my first Matrix collection, The Matrix Revealed:

Let me start with the nuts and bolts of this product. It is enormous in scope and size.

* 250 megabytes of information.

* Over 1100 pages of text.

* Ten and a half hours of audio.

The 2 bonuses alone are rather extraordinary:

* My complete 18-lesson course, LOGIC AND ANALYSIS, which includes the teacher’s manual and audio to guide you. This is a new way to teach logic, the subject that has been missing from schools for decades.

* The complete text (331 pages) of AIDS INC., the book that exposed a conspiracy of scientific fraud deep within the medical research establishment. The book has become a sought-after item, since its publication in 1988. It contains material about viruses, medical testing, and the invention of disease that is, now and in the future, vital to our understanding of phony epidemics arising in our midst. I assure you, the revelations in the book will surprise you; they cut much deeper and are more subtle than “virus made in a lab” scenarios.

The heart and soul of this product are the text interviews I conducted with Matrix-insiders, who have first-hand knowledge of how the major illusions of our world are put together:

* ELLIS MEDAVOY, master of PR, propaganda, and deception, who worked for key controllers in the medical and political arenas. 28 interviews, 290 pages.

* RICHARD BELL, financial analyst and trader, whose profound grasp of market manipulation and economic-rigging is formidable, to say the least. 16 interviews, 132 pages.

* JACK TRUE, the most creative hypnotherapist on the face of the planet. Jack’s anti-Matrix understanding of the mind and how to liberate it is unparalleled. His insights are unique, staggering. 43 interviews, 320 pages.

Also included:

* Several more interviews with brilliant analysts of the Matrix. 53 pages.

* Ten and a half hours of my solo audio presentation — based on these interviews and my own research. Title: “The Multi-Dimensional Planetary Chessboard—The Matrix Vs. the Un-Conditioning of the Individual.”

(All the documents are pdf files and the audio presentations are mp3 files. You download the files upon purchase. There is no physical ship.)

This planet, and the simultaneous order and chaos that exemplify it, are by no means finished. We are just at the beginning. We haven’t come this far to give up the ghost. The “lock and key” are coming apart. The next few millennia will be full of surprises.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

The TPP and GMOs: what’s so bad about death?

The TPP and GMOs: what’s so bad about death?

by Jon Rappoport

November 8, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

The text of the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) has now been published.

[https:// ustr (dot) gov /trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text]

This Globalist treaty will put mega-corporations even further ahead in their efforts to dominate markets and populations.

“The parts of the TPP that cover food safety are especially troubling,” states the watchdog Food and Water Watch:

“’American consumers are pushing to block the use of artificial and potentially risky processes and ingredients, like antibiotics and GMOs, but the TPP could trump these democratic efforts to improve our food supply,’ said [Wenonah] Hauter [Food and Water Watch executive director]… Agribusiness and biotech seed companies can now more easily use trade rules to challenge countries that ban GMO imports, test for GMO contamination, do not promptly approve new GMO crops or even require GMO labeling.”

The majority of Monsanto’s GMO crops are engineered to withstand huge amounts of the pesticide Roundup, and the main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate, which the World Health Organization now lists as a “probable carcinogen.” As in: cancer.

That’s a recent finding.

But what did Monsanto know decades ago?

From GM Watch, November 6; “Monsanto’s secret studies reveal glyphosate link to cancer”:

“Monsanto has known for almost four decades that glyphosate causes cancer, according to a new paper by researchers Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff.

“Samsel is the first independent researcher to examine Monsanto’s secret toxicology studies on glyphosate. He obtained the studies, which have been denied to other inquirers, via a request to his senator. With his co-researcher Dr Stephanie Seneff of MIT, he reviewed Monsanto’s data.

“Samsel and Seneff concluded that ‘significant evidence of tumours was found during these investigations’.

“However, they add, ‘to create doubt and obscure the statistical significance of inconvenient findings, which may have prevented product registration’, Monsanto introduced irrelevant historical control data from other experiments. This is data from the control animals in other unrelated experiments, which may have been carried out under widely differing conditions.

“This practice had the effect of creating experimental noise which cancelled out the statistically significant findings of increased tumours in any one experiment.

“In various cancer experiments, Samsel and Seneff found, Monsanto introduced spurious data from 3, 5, 7 and even 11 unrelated study controls to effectively eliminate results, as needed.”

Getting the picture?

the matrix revealed

The new TPP greatly benefits corporations like Monsanto, and can enable the growing and shipping of all sorts of GMO crops (laden with titanic quantities of Roundup), without labeling, without inspection, and without the power of national governments to stop this ongoing crime—even though Monsanto knew, long ago, that Roundup causes tumors.

Where is the US Justice Department? Nowhere. Where is Obama, who is desperately pushing for passage of the TPP? Nowhere.

Maybe, although we don’t know it, “the science is settled.” Roundup is actually good for you. It raises IQ, extends physical endurance, elevates mood, assures safe pregnancies, promotes freedom, ensures equality and justice for all, secretly puts money in your bank account while you’re sleeping, and makes everybody love one another right now.

Operators are standing by. Call 800-THE FIX IS IN and support Monsanto for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Media Matrix: an ancient Tibetan perspective on the evening network news

by Jon Rappoport

November 6, 2015

(To join our email list, click here.)

“A long time ago, teachers and students in Tibet considered themselves artists of reality. They practiced inventing it. And then, separating themselves from every other spiritual system, they practiced destroying what they created. Back and forth, back and forth, with the goal of achieving an intimate knowledge of their own existence.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Television news is about giving the viewer a dose of mind control, but what’s the underlying principle?

Answer: Something is better than nothing.

Corollary: A lot of something is better than even a little bit of nothing.

Imagine this: an elite television news anchor just sits there in front of the camera for a half-hour. Silently.

People watching this would start to get very antsy. They would feel anger and rage building up inside them.

Why?

What’s wrong with nothing? Why is it so maligned?

“And now, tonight, we have no news to report. Nothing happened today.”

What??

“He’s crazy. He’s a lunatic. Get him off the air. He’s making me feel…”

Making the viewer feel what? And why?

For the early Tibetan adepts, the Void was a vital concept.

Stripped of its metaphysical baggage and embroidery, Void was the place where creating stopped. The constant “noise of existence” went away.

The ongoing parade of inner thoughts, sentiments, propensities—vanished.

For as long as a person wanted to stay there. And experience the greatest “vacation” he’d ever known. If he could handle it.

But humans felt a great need to avoid the Void. They demanded activity, flow, information.

They eventually sank to the level of passivity…and then they simply wanted input, more input, and still more input.

From an authoritative unimpeachable external source.

Hence, from the earliest societies onward, there was a thing called: the news.

It was updated. It was ongoing. It was forever.

Priests delivered it. Kings delivered it. Their minions delivered it.

If the news stopped, people felt anxiety, which, at bottom, was a fear of Void.

There is much more to say about the Tibetans and their understanding of Void and its twin, ongoing Creation, but I’ll save that for another time.

Now, in these times, the global population has television news.

The imitations of life called anchors are the arbiters. How they speak, how they look, how they themselves experience emotion—all this is planted deep in the minds of the viewers.

Much of the world can’t imagine the evening news could look and sound any other way.

That’s how solid the long-term brainwashing is.

The elite anchors, from John Daly, in the early days of television, all the way to Lester Holt and Scott Pelley, have set the style. They define the genre.

The anchor taps into, and mimics, that part of the audience’s psyche that wants smooth delivery of superficial cause and effect. (In the Void, of course, cause and effect dissolve.)

The network anchor is the wizard of Is. He keeps explaining what is. “Here’s something that is, and then over here we have something else that is, and now, just in, a new thing that is.” He lays down miles of “is-concrete” to pave over deeper, uncomfortable truth.

Ultimately, he is paving over Void.

On air, the anchor is neutral, a castratus, a eunuch.

This is a time-honored ancient tradition. The eunuch, by his diminished condition, has the trust of the ruler. He guards the emperor’s inner sanctum. He acts as a buffer between his master and the people. He applies the royal seal to official documents.

All expressed shades of emotion occur and are managed within that persona of the dependable court eunuch. The anchor who can move the closest to the line of being human without actually arriving there is the champion. These days, it was, until his downfall, Brian Williams.

The vibrating string between eunuch and human is the frequency that makes an anchor great. Think Cronkite, Chet Huntley, Edward R Murrow. Huntley was a just a touch too masculine, so they teamed him up with David Brinkley, a medium-boiled egg. Brinkley supplied twinkles of comic relief.

There are other reasons for “voice-neutrality” of the anchor. Neutrality conveys a sense of science. “We did the experiment in the lab and this is how it turned out.”

Television news is really all segue all the time. That’s what it comes down to.

The word “segue,” pronounced “segway,” refers to a transition from one thing to another, a blend.

Ed McMahon once referred to Johnny Carson as the prince of blends, because Carson could tell a clunker of a joke, step on it three times, and still move to the next joke without losing his audience.

Television news is very serious business. A reporter who can’t handle segues is dead in the water. He’s a gross liability.

The good anchors can take two stories that have no connection whatsoever and create a sense of smooth transition.

Brian Williams could say, “The planes were recalled later in the afternoon…And a man was cut in two in a horrific accident in Idaho today…And in Seattle (smile), three people reported seeing turtles falling from the sky.”

And it works. The segue works. The blends from one story to another seem reasonable somehow.

The networks basically have, on a daily basis, radically fragmented stories, and they need an anchor who can do the blends, the segues, and get away with it, to promote the sense of one continuous flow. So the audience doesn’t say, “This is just an odd collection of surreal moments, this is Salvador Dali on my television screen.”

The news is all segue all the time.

Not just nationally. On the local level, too. The pounding lead-in music at the top of the show prepares the audience. A) Music. B) “Tonight, our top story: a man ate a hot dog and died …”

The voice of the anchor is the non-stop blending machine that ties all news stories together. That’s why the elite network stars earn their paychecks.

Good segue people are stage magicians. They can move the viewer’s attention from item A to item B without a tremor or a doubt.

The segue, the blend not only connects wildly disparate pieces, it keeps the viewer from brushing up against the Void. The blend is the primary mechanism for creating an endless river of “information” linoleum with no cracks.

It’s often been said of certain actors, “He could read from the phone book and you’d listen.” Well, an elite anchor can hold the viewer’s mind as he reads a sentence from the phone book, another one from a car-repair manual, a third from a cookbook, and a fourth from a funeral-home brochure. Without stopping.

And afterward, the viewer would have no questions.

The news is surreal because the stories are mostly fool’s gold to begin with; and they’re unrelated. They’re rocks lying around. The anchor picks them up and invents the illusion of One Flowing Stream.

This is what the audience wants. The news feels like a story. It feels like unity. It feels like a stage play or a movie. It feels, when all is said and done, good.

You can’t pull just anyone off the street and have him describe car crashes, murders, storms, threats of war, political squabbles, 300 cats living in a one-room apartment, a new piece of Medicare legislation, genitalia picture tweets, and the dedication of a new library, while keeping the audience in a light trance.

Katie Couric couldn’t do it. People were waiting for her to break out into an attack of Perky and giggle and cross her legs. Diane Sawyer had her bad nights. She seemed to be affecting somber personal grief as her basic segue-thread. Scott Pelley is competent, but he has his off-moments, too, when he’s suddenly sitting like a surgeon ready to signal the anesthesiologist to clamp a mask on your face, before he cuts into your stomach.

Whereas, a true version of the news would go something like this: “Well, folks, just now I moved from a tornado in Kansas to the removal of restrictions on condom sales, and I’m blending directly into penguins in Antarctica. I’m doing Salvador Dali and you’re not noticing a thing.”

The anchor is basically saying to the audience, “I’m a few feet inside your personal landscape, your mind, feeding you all the turns in the river, and I’ll always be here…papering over the Void.”

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Elite anchors invent and maintain certain tones of voice, certain rhythms, certain cadences, certain variations of musical pitch, in order to sustain the sense of continuity.

They’re mechanics of voice.

They use their skills to report the false facts handed down to conceal ops and staged events.

They can know they’re actors on television, but they can believe (in direct contradiction) they’re delivering the truth.

“Okay, look,” the producer says to the veteran actor he’s interviewing for the lead, in a billion-dollar production called the news. “This may sound strange, but you’re going to have to do Normal as it’s never been done before. That’s what the audience wants. You’ve got to come across as very, very smart and very, very Normal. Get it? Pretend you’re the brain of every other brain. You’re the conscience of every other conscience. You’re just as walled off from the conspiracy to own every inch of America as Americans are walled off from knowing about it. You know as little as they do. You’re clean, sanitary, loyal as a dog, dumb as fog but very smart. You spew absolute nonsense every second of your time on stage, but it sounds eminently plausible. You constantly change subjects, and the subjects are in no way related to each other, but you make it all Liquid Flow. It’s a joke. But you’re serious. And you’ll get rich.”

And people, with their inordinate and strange fear of dropping down into the gorgeous silence of Void, will watch and listen. They’ll roll up their sleeves and shoot themselves up with the news every night.

Here’s a parting tidbit: The early Tibetans, with their stout, strong, and implacable techniques and exercises, were artists of reality. They were saying, “If you practice inventing reality to the hilt, with great intensity, and then practice not inventing it, you’ll grasp the twin pillars of this existence. You’ll become immune to fear of the Void. You’ll recognize bullshit, on both the daily and cosmic levels, as you’ve never known them before. As a side effect, you’ll be able to analyze information with a keener gaze than you imagined was possible.”

Or you can have the network evening news.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Sweden: test case for the new utopia

Sweden: test case for the new utopia

by Jon Rappoport

November 6, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“I have never written a word with the intent to make people fearful. I believe, and will always believe, that the individual can triumph, no matter what circumstances surround him, if he knows what he is, what he is capable of, and the creative force he possesses.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Note: This article is based on non-mainstream reports and sources who are decidedly independent of the Swedish establishment. Why is it necessary to hunt for facts? Because news is being suppressed.

The population of Sweden? 9.5 million people.

Only 9.5 million.

This should give you some idea about what is happening there, at ground level, as the migrant wave sweeps in.

There are also restrictions on what Swedes can say about the invasion. Political correctness rules. If this isn’t troubling, I don’t know what is.

As usual, politicians and various “community leaders” have jumped on the immigration bandwagon. At minimum, they have lost their minds. I see no coherent assessment of what effect migration will actually have on the economy—especially in a country famous for giving everything away.

Free government services are paid for by taxes. Let’s not forget that. So the extremely high tax rate will jump even higher.

I’m reading reports of violence and rape in Sweden—crimes committed by the new immigrants. From what I gather, even speaking about or publicizing these crimes is a violation.

From what I’ve learned about Sweden over the last 50 years, it’s clear the prevalent attitude of “it’s all good, things are fine, people are nice” is now being layered over the current migration crisis—which would be the equivalent of somehow seeing rainbows festooned with cupids in the middle of a hurricane tearing roofs off houses.

And yet this crisis is still being viewed as a test-case for tolerance. “We must respect all people and their culture…”

But this test case is about something else. It’s about what happens when the culture and community of a country are torn apart. It’s a test case for globalization. What happens when artificial and forced immigration, in great numbers, brings about chaos?

Globalist planners are pondering: “What amount and quality of revolt among the Swedish people will take place? How easy or difficult will it be to squash such a revolt? How long will it take to achieve the goal of somehow “integrating” a new population, most of whom have no intention of blending into the prevailing culture, some of whom plan to take it apart?”

This is a test case for burying the 9.5 million people of Sweden in a new heterogeneous mixture, in order to see what occurs.

Because, make no mistake about it, it is also the plan for many industrialized technological societies around the world.

This is the perception the Globalists hope to engender: “When we look at Germany, France, Sweden, England, and parts of the US, we no longer see the old homogenous population. Therefore, why call them separate nations? Why should they have borders? Why should they have immigration quotas? There are no immigrants. There are only ‘world citizens.’ Given that fact, they all must be governed as One, from an elevated management platform…”

Globalism, par excellence.

This is why Sweden is a test case.

The Globalist inquiry is: “How deeply programmed with ‘humanitarian goals’ are these Swedish people? How much will they endure silently? To what degree will they refuse to see what is in front of their faces?”

Obviously, we are talking about mind control on a widespread basis.

To come back to the economic picture, we will see major jolts. Household incomes will fall. Taxes will increase. Consumer spending will drop. Therefore, Swedish companies will undergo very hard times.

As I’ve written before, this is where the rubber meets the road in the Globalist plan. If companies and corporations that are supposed to win in the “new civilization” can’t find a sufficient consumer base, disaster will loom.

In this light, there is the strong possibility that Sweden will also become a test case for an even more profound Welfare State. Whether through the invention of a new currency, or by allocation of credit, all persons in Sweden would receive enough buying power to “participate in the economy.”

Elite Globalists: “All right, now we have transformed the population and culture of Sweden. We’re clamping down on citizen revolts. But the consumer base is shrinking. Poverty is spreading. It’s time to make every person a viable consumer. Time to invent money and spread it around.”

Of course, this happened in many countries long ago. But not to this degree, and not by universal dictate.

Such a plan in Sweden would be fraught with the usual crises and disasters. For example: people demanding more buying power; people sending huge amounts of money out of the country; people using money to set up local crime organizations; government debt explodes; there is nothing left of the culture except low-level consumerism; riots against the wealthy increase…

The challenge for Globalists would be to somehow hold it all together and propagandize it as a new social-justice utopia. Free speech, of course, would be banned.

If you want a picture of the new economy, watch the 1982 film, Blade Runner. Forget the plot. Just look at the streets and alleys of the city, the people trudging along in a perpetual drizzle, the zig-zag bazaars and street-booths, the huddled customers, the gray defeated faces, the hints of a broad underground economy.

the matrix revealed

For those who live in Sweden now, and I particularly mean those who are free and independent individuals, it is time for them to assess their future from a position of independence—not as a willing slave of the emerging system.

As countries devolve into lower and lower forms of socialism and forced totalitarianism, it will become clearer to those who can see, going forward, that The Individual is the key.

He is the vanguard. He is the living repository of whatever is good about civilized tradition. He is the lamp in the darkness.

Most importantly, he is the one with imagination and creative force, who, no matter what, can invent new realities that take hold outside the planned mediocrity and destruction.

And in retrospect, he will be recognized as the reason civilization existed in the first place, beyond all other reasons: liberation.

Because after the other liberations are finished, he is the core. He sees life, he has life, he transmits life.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Immortal consciousness

Immortal consciousness

by Jon Rappoport

November 5, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

In previous articles (see here), I’ve cut through a great deal of “scientific” noise and shown that consciousness is not made out of atoms; it’s non-material.

It’s not subject to the laws of physics or the laws of the natural world. It endures. It doesn’t pass away.

I’m talking about individual consciousness…and, therefore, the individual. The You.

Inhabiting a physical form may be a temporary situation, but the You isn’t temporary. It, together with its consciousness, survives.

You survive.

You endure.

There is no end to you.

But consciousness isn’t a steady-state phenomenon. It’s dynamic. It’s, above all else, creative.

It imagines realities and futures. It brings them into being, unless it’s asleep, diverted, buried, ignored, denied.

Consciousness wants to create more consciousness.

My several-decade project of developing imagination exercises was launched with all this in mind, and the culmination was my collection, Exit From The Matrix.

Its purpose: empower consciousness to become more creative.

There is no end to what the individual can invent and achieve.

exit from the matrix

Here are the contents of Exit From The Matrix:

First, my new audio presentations:

* INTRODUCTION: HOW TO USE THE MATERIALS IN EXIT FROM THE MATRIX

* EXIT FROM THE MATRIX

* 50 IMAGINATION EXERCISES

* FURTHER IMAGINATION EXERCISES

* ANESTHESIA, BOREDOM, EXCITEMENT, ECSTASY

* ANCIENT TIBET AND THE UNIVERSE AS A PRODUCT OF MIND

* YOU THE INVENTOR, MINDSET, AND FREEDOM FROM “THE EXISTENCE PROGRAM”

* PARANORMAL EXPERIMENTS AND EXERCISES

* CHILDREN AND IMAGINATION

* THE CREATIVE LIFE AND THE MATRIX/IMAGINATION

* PICTURES OF REALITY AND ESCAPE VELOCITY FROM THE MATRIX

* THIS WOULD BE A VERY DIFFERENT FUTURE

* MODERN ZEN

* THE GREAT PASSIONS AND THE GREAT ANDROIDS

Then you will receive the following audio seminars I have previously done:

* Mind Control, Mind Freedom

* The Transformations

* Desire, Manifestation and Fulfillment

* Altered States, Consciousness, and Magic

* Beyond Structures

* The Mystery and Magic of Dialogue

* The Voyage of Merlin

* Modern Alchemy and Imagination

* Imagination and Spiritual Enlightenment

* Dissolving Stress

* The Paranormal Project

* Zen Painting for Everyone Now

* Past Lives, Archetypes, and Hidden Sources of Human Energy

* Expression of Self

* Imagination Exercises for a Lifetime

* Old Planet, New Planet, New Mind

* The Era of Magic Returns

* Your Power Revealed

* Universes Without End

* Relationships

* Building a Business for Success

I have included an additional bonus section:

* My book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies (pdf document)

* My book, The Ownership of All Life (pdf document)

* A long excerpt from my briefly published book, Full Power (pdf document)

* My 24 articles in the series, “Coaching the Coaches” (pdf document)

And these audio seminars:

* The Role of Medical Drugs in Human Illness

* Longevity One: The Mind-Body Connection

* Longevity Two: The Nutritional Factors

(All the audio presentations are mp3 files and the documents and books are pdf files. You download the files upon purchase. There is no physical ship.)

What has been called The Matrix is a series of layers. These layers compose what we call Reality. Reality is not merely the consensus people accept in their daily lives. It is also a personal and individual conception of limits. It is a perception that these limits are somehow built into existence. But this is not true.

What I’ve done here is remove the lid on those perceived limits. This isn’t an intellectual undertaking. It’s a way to open up space and step on to a new road.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

The Cosmological News channel

The Cosmological News Channel

by Jon Rappoport

November 4, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

“People are fascinated by ancient cultures and the shamans and magicians who practice in mysterious ways. But along with this fascination, there is a kind of aversion to The New, as if it must be irrevocably tainted, as if nothing new and as yet uncreated could possibly match what once was. This is not only false, it is a form of psychic surrender. The psyche shows no faith in itself or its inherent power. Part of my work is reversing that defeatism.” (The Magician Awakes, Jon Rappoport)

Cosmologies are a dime a dozen.

Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Spinoza, Big Bang, String Theory, the Bible, Vedanta, Olympic gods, Egyptian gods, Norse myths, African creation stories…

Cosmology: a picture of the universe; a story about the origin of life; a tale about the connection between consciousness and the universe.

These cosmologies share a common trait. They purport to explain What Is. And they claim to do it at a “higher level.”

There is another thing about cosmology: people are magnetically attracted to it, because they want a story that will settle matters for them, give them final answers.

Poof. It’s done.

“The universe knows what I need, and it’ll give it to me when I’m ready. If something I want doesn’t happen, it wasn’t meant to be. Not yet.”

For many, many people, cosmology is permission to remain passive.

Of course, for those with great faith in a particular story, it can also provide an opportunity to go on the march and kill unbelievers.

Cosmology is a content provider. People want content. Cosmology is like the nightly news. “Fill up the empty spaces, please.”

Cosmology has a degrading effect on the individual when he uses it to stand in for what he might otherwise do, if left to his own devices and inner resources.

But how many people care about their inner resources?

Those who do, whoever they are, wherever they are: I’m speaking to them.

There is a fundamental twist in cosmology. It starts off by connecting the individual to wider, broader, deeper realities. But wait: these realities are not of his own making. They’re imported.

Sooner or later, the imports convey a hypnotic impact. “This is true, accept me, believe in me, there’s nothing else you need to do…”

So…what about the free and independent individual? And more importantly, what is freedom for?

However we might answer that last question, freedom is certainly tuned to the future. It is the basis for The New, whatever that might be.

The New. People have decidedly mixed reactions to that concept, which is uncharted. There no guarantees.

But the mind, consciousness, the psyche are not only looking for The New, they want to imagine it, invent it, create it.

That desire is inherent in the dynamic, electric, restless, wide-ranging, agile nature of consciousness.

Cut off that desire and watch what happens. Life will then organize itself into little compartments, and energy will leak away.

Creating The New is the lifeblood of the individual and individual consciousness.

This has nothing to do with cosmology.

With enough sustained creation and invention, however, the individual will come to his own cosmological ideas and answers, in a natural way.

Nikola Tesla: “Our first endeavors are purely instinctive prompting of an imagination vivid and undisciplined. As we grow older reason asserts itself and we become more and more systematic and designing. But those early [imaginative] impulses, though not immediately productive, are of the greatest moment and may shape our very destinies. Indeed, I feel now that had I understood and cultivated instead of suppressing them, I would have added substantial value to my bequest to the world. But not until I had attained manhood did I realize that I was an inventor.”

Albert Einstein: “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution.”

The so-called “mysteries of genius” notwithstanding, every individual has something hidden away in his soul: an urge to create and project that creation out into the world.

There is no way to tell what will come of it, or what substance it contains, until imagination walks through the door, until the process begins, and gets underway…

No matter what circumstances he lives in, the individual wants to invent The New.

It is this desire, impulse, force that moves beyond any pre-set cosmology.

It is this impulse from which Tomorrow wants to be made.

It is this impulse which shuts down the Cosmological News Channel, and recognizes it for what it is: a second-hand metaphysical media outlet, owned and operated by the Reality Manufacturing Company, a subsidiary of We Create, You Absorb, Inc.

exit from the matrix

In 1961, decades before I started to work as a reporter, I was living in New York, I had just begun painting, and I was having conversations with an extraordinary healer, Richard Jenkins. (I write about Richard in my book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies — which is included as a bonus in my collections Exit From The Matrix and Power Outside The Matrix.)

One day, at my studio, I was asking him about a few Hindu creation myths. He looked at me strangely, and then he said something to this effect: Don’t you realize you’re doing your own creation stories? You’re here every day painting. What do you think that’s about? This isn’t ten thousand years ago. This is now. You’re making the future.

He was right. He was suggesting I wake up.

So many people are preoccupied with finding a cosmology in the past. They can root around forever, and still they won’t see the power they themselves have.

Any story you could invent about the cosmos would, in the long run, serve you better than accepting a burnished story someone else told 5000 years ago.

The essential quality of The New is that it is not yet created. It is beyond the reach of What Is Already Accepted, and it depends entirely on the individual and his imagination.

Beyond all programming.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.