Category Archives: Germ Virus Theory

How Swine Flu Was Invented

What if you started a disease-scare and nobody cared?

UPDATED AND EXPANDED to include the whole mind-boggling fraud.

By Jon Rappoport

June 27, 2012

(To join our email list, click here.)

I wrote a shorter version of this article yesterday. After I was done, I decided to expand it before publishing it. So this is the longer piece. It exposes the whole Swine Flu operation as a complete fraud, from the beginning.

I’m assuming readers want to understand this. They are willing to follow a track of thought from start to finish. They want more than a headline and a few paragraphs. I say this because, as a reporter who has been exposing medical fraud for 25 years, I’ve found that the criminals try to cover their tracks. To see how they do it, you have to unwind their ball of yarn all the way. It’s not one-two-three.

With that proviso, here we go.

Remember these terms: La Gloria, PCR test. They are important in understanding how a fake pandemic can be invented from scratch, based on no evidence. You see, it’s not the germ, it’s the false announcement of the germ. It’s the concoction of an apparition, a ghost, a phantom. That’s how you launch a fake pandemic. That’s how you sell fear. That’s how you try to make people take their vaccines and keep their mouths shut.

In my years as an investigative medical reporter, I’ve developed a rule of thumb when dealing with the US Centers for Disease Control:

If they’re not lying, they’re lying.

I’ve found this guideline works out well. It’s almost magic.

For example, at the so-called height of the Swine Flu epidemic, in the summer of 2009, CBS News exposed the fact that the CDC, in an egregious dereliction of its duty, had stopped counting Swine Flu cases. The CDC just assumed people arriving at hospitals or doctors’ offices with anything resembling the flu had Swine Flu. Therefore, the CDC really didn’t have the faintest idea how many people in America had Swine Flu. Yet, soon after this CBS report broke, the CDC issued a mind-boggling announcement plucked out of thin air: there were undoubtedly 10 MILLION people in the US infected with Swine Flu. No evidence. No test results. No facts. Just scare tactics. As in: “You must get vaccinated.”

Well, they’re bloviating again, in a choice bit of revisionist history.

A new CDC study, published in the Lancet Infectious Diseases Journal, states that the final global figure for Swine Flu deaths, 18,500, was grossly underestimated. The new and far more precise figure is…25,000? No. 50,000? No. 100,000?

No.

250,000! But wait. It actually might be as high as 575,400, say the CDC wizards.

What kind of rabbit hat is the CDC pulling those numbers from? The hat is called “a computer model” or a “statistical model.” This is code for: “We devised algorithms, equations, and charts which no one will bother to examine or assess or judge. Trust us. We’re the pros.”

It’s well known that computer models can be created and spun to achieve a wide variety of outcomes, depending on, for example, the result one favors from the get-go. Models of global warming have come under withering attack on that basis.

In typical bungling CDC fashion, the researchers have left clues about their work. The study authors write, “Diagnostic specimens are not always obtained from people who die with influenza and the viruses might no longer be detectable by the time of death in some people.” You might want to read that sentence again.

Translation: “We don’t know what we’re talking about when we jack up the estimates on deaths from Swine Flu because, well, there are a lot of dead people who died without ever having been tested for the H1N1 Swine Flu virus, and we can’t dig up their bodies now and run the tests. But our computer models can somehow perform post-mortem exams.”

Or: “Many, many people died without anyone knowing whether they had Swine Flu. So naturally we’ll assume they did.”

This is called science, and American tax dollars pay for it. They pay for an agency, the CDC, that is tasked with scaring Americans into getting vaccines, no matter what. Even if a re-write of history is necessary.

You see, after all the whipped-up hysteria, in 2009, when the CDC and the World Health Organization told us that a great horror, the H1N1 virus, was stalking the globe and mowing people down left and right with Swine Flu, the final mortality figure, worldwide, was an extreme embarrassment to these agencies. It was especially embarrassing because, well, the World Health Organization claims that, every year, between 250,000 and 500,000 people die from ordinary regular seasonal flu. This is not called a pandemic that could wipe out humankind. But when 18,500 people die of Swine Flu, this is called a Level 6 Pandemic, the highest danger category the World Health Organization can declare.

The CDC also announced today that, in 2009, the Swine Flu virus was “the predominant virus.” In other words, we are supposed to believe, again, with no evidence, that most people who died that year from flu died from Swine Flu. Or to put it another way, in 2009 the usual seasonal flu viruses that circulate decided to take a holiday and give the new kid on the block, Swine Flu, H1N1, a chance to spread his wings and see what he could do.

Therefore, these viruses must be cordial to one another. When a new one comes along, the others make room. They have a conference (thankfully not supported with tax monies) and they come to a consensus.

In some media outlets, the AFP story on this new CDC Swine Flu study included an interesting final sentence, and in at least one other major outlet, the final sentence was omitted.

It was: “The Council of Europe accused the agency [the World Health Organization] of causing unjustified scare and a waste of public money [in their launch and handling of the Swine Flu debacle.]”

Nothing to see there, just move along. Listen to the CDC and the World Health Organization and obey. Do what they tell you to do. They know stuff; you don’t. They’re brilliant; you’re a robot. Line up and take your vaccine.

If you swallow all that, I have stunning condos for sale on Jupiter.

Now let’s go deeper.

Realize, as well, that when the whole Swine Flu scare was launched in the spring of 2009, the WHO absurdly declared the H1N1 virus a Level-6 Pandemic based on a mere 20, that’s 20, cases of Swine Flu. At the same time, WHO changed its definition of “Level-6 Pandemic” so that severe destruction and widespread human death were no longer required. This is like saying a pandemic can be a pandemic without being a pandemic. (Search Peter Doshi, BMJ Online, for coverage on these two points.)

These factors provide strong circumstantial evidence that Swine Flu was an operation designed to frighten the global population, based on nothing. Nothing but anticipated pharmaceutical profits from the sale of vaccines and drugs.

Where did Swine Flu originate? A place called La Gloria, in Mexico, where a large industrial pig farm was located. Press reports described outdoor “pig feces lagoons” on the property. When workers began to get sick, the area was sprayed with unknown chemicals. More workers fell ill. Anyone with a basic knowledge of public health could testify that this combination of mind-boggling sanitation plus a strong germicide could cause human disease. In fact, it doesn’t matter which particular germs are present in the mix.

People at the CDC had to be well aware of this. Yet their choice was to rush researchers to La Gloria, armed with the unfounded assumption that some novel virus, never before seen, was the culprit, and their job was to take blood samples and discover what the new germ was.

Why? Why assume when workers who operate in that kind of environment get sick there is some new disease at work? The symptoms of the workers were not unusual, given the circumstances. Workers dying in that vat of filth and chemical soup should be expected.

But, up front, based on no evidence, the CDC on-site team was going for a new germ and a new disease, and that’s what they announced they had found. A gullible world, fed by press reports, bought in.

But, you say, cases of Swine Flu were subsequently diagnosed all over the planet. It wasn’t just La Gloria. You have to understand how these diagnoses were made, when they were made at all, beyond eyeballing sick people with “flu symptoms” and automatically claiming Swine Flu was the cause.

There is a test called the PCR. This was the major tool used to diagnose Swine Flu. Given the fact that it’s an expensive genetic assay, we can assume it wasn’t done often. The PCR basically takes very, very tiny amounts of unknown human genetic material and amplifies them to the point where they can be observed. In other words, there wasn’t enough “germ” to begin with. It was so miniscule, you couldn’t ID it as is.

This is called a clue. In order to even begin to think about indicting a germ as a cause of a disease, you need to find very large amounts of it. The army of germs has to be huge and it has to be doing something in the body. The PCR test doesn’t yield such a conclusion at all. If anything, it confirms that the army was non-existent.

The test used to diagnose Swine Flu was useless. It was misleading. It was obvious it was misleading. But it was used. Why?

Because it would provide cover. It would make it seem as if Swine Flu was everywhere on the planet.

This is more circumstantial evidence of an intentional operation.

Call a local environmental calamity (in La Gloria) a new disease based on no evidence. Have the leading public health agency in the world (the WHO) change its definition of pandemic to allow a declaration of a level-6 threat, based on a mere 20 cases. Start labeling ordinary flu Swine Flu. Claim it is a new disease, based on no evidence. Use a test to diagnose it that is useless and misleading.

And you’re home free. You have a global threat. You have fear. You have drug companies making a fortune. You have people believing they have to get their vaccines. You have toxic vaccines (by their very nature and composition) injected into the global population.

You have billions of people listening to the WHO and the CDC and following medical orders, which really amounts to political control. It’s all part of the operation to ensnare people into a cradle-to-grave medical apparatus that diagnoses one disease after another, treats these diseases with highly toxic drugs that produce new symptoms, then diagnosing those symptoms as new diseases and then treating those with more toxic drugs, until eventually death comes.

Except a funny thing happened on the CDC’s road to victory in the Swine Flu operation. The Internet rose up like a bear and swatted the CDC with a big paw. A handful of reporters and researchers (including moi) blew the deal. Exposed the scam.

The CDC and the WHO lost. They were slammed. Governments all over over the world are holding stocks of unused H1N1 vaccine, because people didn’t show up to get jabbed in the arm. It was a fiasco for the medical cartel.

Yes, Virginia, sometimes we win. And when we do, if we learn enough, we’re ready for the next load of lies and we know what to do.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

A Staged Bioterror Attack

Clues to look for when determining if a bioterror event has been staged or not

by Jon Rappoport

June 10, 2012

(To join our email list, click here.)

There are certain future scenarios which, with enough exposure BEFORE THEY HAPPEN, can be stopped, or at least analyzed correctly when they occur.

A staged bioterror event is one of those, and I want to spell out a scenario for you.

This goes along with what I’ve been discussing in my last few articles about germ theory (click here and here). First, the germ theory of disease is wrong. I don’t care what kind of germ you’re talking about or where it came from, releasing it intentionally does not create predictable results.

People whose immune systems are at different levels of strength are going to react differently.

The perpetrators may find that less than 2% of people exposed get sick and die.

Furthermore, spreading a germ poses the serious problem of containment.

How do biowar operatives confine the spread of a germ?

There is no easy answer.

BUT, there is another way. And this is something to look out for.

The use of a germ as a cover story for a chemical.

In other words, there is no germ attack. It’s called a germ attack, but that’s a lie. The perps bring in researchers, to the affected area, who go on to claim they have isolated a germ that is the cause of death and illness. It’s a sham. What really happened was the spread of a toxic chemical that is almost impossible to detect, unless you suspect it is there.

The chemical has severe and deadly effects for a week. Then it disperses and loses potency and the “epidemic” is done.

A chemical CAN be used in pinpoint fashion.

In some town, a fairly isolated community, the word goes out that people are suddenly falling ill and dying. The CDC and the Army are called in to cordon off the area and quarantine all citizens. A peremptory announcement is made, early on, that this is a biowar attack.

Major media are allowed outside the periphery. Network news anchors set up on-location and do all their nightly broadcasts “from the scene.”

The entire nation, the entire world is focused on the “event,” 24/7.

People inside the cordon fall ill and die. Reports come out from the town.

The networks report that “heroic doctors are taking samples of blood and the blood is being analyzed to find the germ that is causing the epidemic.” The DOD confirms this is, indeed, a biowar attack. A terrorist event.

Human interest stories pile up. This family lost three members, that family lost everybody. Tragedy, horror, and the desired empathic response from “the world community.”

It’s a soap opera, except real people are dying.

The medical cartel promotes FEAR OF THE GERM.

All controlling entities get to obtain their piece of the terrorist pie.

Finally, the doctors announce they have isolated the germ causing the death in the small town, and researchers are rushing to develop a vaccine (which they produce in record time).

Everyone everywhere must be vaccinated, now. No choice. Do it or be quarantined or jailed.

Now that the (phony non-existent) germ has been found, “relevant” (toxic) medical drugs can be shipped into the town for the residents.

In this declared martial law situation, the doctors are the heroes. The doctors and the Army. And the government and even the media.

Then, after a week, when the potency of the secret chemical has dispersed, it’s over.

When you think about it, this scenario is a cameo of what happens every day, all over the world, in doctor’s offices. The doctor has already diagnosed the patient with a germ-caused disease and prescribed a drug. The patient is coming back with new serious symptoms caused by the drug. The doctor says no, the symptoms are an escalation of the original germ-caused disease. So the doctor now prescribes a more toxic drug, and that will produce new effects, and at the next appointment the doctor will either continue to say the original disease has gotten worse or the the patient has a new disease. The chemicals (drugs) are the real culprits, but the doctor keeps saying it’s a germ(s). This is the template of much of modern medicine.

In other words, a chem-war attack is being leveled at people all over the world all the time.

A so-called bio-terror event in a small town is simply a repeat performance dressed up in a different way, to induce fear and compliance.

See Dr. Barbara Starfield (Johns Hopkins School of Public Health), July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, “Is US health really the best in the world?” 106,000 people in America are killed every year by FDA-approved medical drugs. That’s a MILLION people per decade (click here for more info). Also Google “FDA Why Should You Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions.” the FDA admits 100,000 people in America die every year from the effects of medical drugs. (Click here to go directly to the FDA page in question. See also this news roundup concerning the FDA in this regard.)

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Germ Theory and Depopulation

Germ Theory and Depopulation

by Jon Rappoport

June 8, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

I want to straighten out the thinking of many people who look at germs as the primary vehicle for reducing the global population. These are the people who continue to say, against all evidence, that the “pandemics” of the last few decades stemmed from deadly bio-engineered germs launched to kill massive numbers of people.

First and foremost, the “pandemics” were duds. West Nile, SARS, bird flu, swine flu. Even overblown estimates of swine flu deaths, worldwide, eventually settled in at about 20,000.

By comparison, according to the same organization that pegged the swine flu death total, the World Health Organization (WHO), annual deaths from ordinary non-pandemic seasonal flu range from 300,000 to 500,000.

Odd that swine flu is called a pandemic, while ordinary flu is ignored. Odd? Absurd.

In the spring of 2009, as documented by Peter Doshi in the BMJ, two very curious things happened at WHO: with only 20 confirmed cases of swine flu, that’s 20, WHO declared swine flu a level-6 pandemic, which is the highest threat level possible; and at the same time, in Orwellian fashion, WHO revised its definition of “level-6 pandemic,” so that it no longer required severe devastation and large numbers of deaths. WHO could declare a germ was a horrible global threat, regardless of whether it was causing any real harm.

If that doesn’t raise red flags, nothing will. Swine flu was a PROPAGANDA OPERATION, plain and simple, aimed at scaring populations and driving them to get vaccines. That was the op. And it failed. In fact, the op was exposed (by yours truly and others) as a sham and a con. Millions of people online caught on. It was a devastating defeat for WHO, the CDC, and the medical cartel.

Let’s go deeper. In general, so-called contagious diseases are caused, not by germs, but by IMMUNE SYSTEMS THAT ARE TOO WEAK TO FIGHT OFF THOSE GERMS.

When we put the cart and the horse in proper alignment, things become clear. I fully realize this isn’t as sexy as talking about bio-engineered gene sequences in viruses, but the cart and horse must be understood.

GERMS ARE A COVER STORY.

What do they cover up?

The fact that immune systems are the more basic target for depopulation and debilitation of populations.

In a recent piece, I went over this situation vis-a-vis Third World countries, where contaminated water supplies, lack of basic sanitation, overcrowding, severe malnutrition and starvation, stolen fertile land, and Western medicines and vaccines are the real vectors that attack and destroy the immune system on a chronic basis—thereby enabling MANY germs, OTHERWISE HARMLESS, to continually cause deadly infections.

But 30 years ago, it appeared that a new germ had come on the scene, a germ which was, in fact, attacking the immune system directly and lethally. HIV.

In my first book, AIDS Inc. (1988) (which is a bonus included as an e-book in my new collection THE MATRIX REVEALED), I explored the research behind HIV. The bogus, incompetent, ego-driven, misapplied, intentionally false research. The research that made HIV the most feared germ in human history.

I showed there was absolutely no reason to believe that HIV was mounting any attack on immune systems. I showed that the tests for the presence of HIV were completely unreliable and misleading, and the drugs to treat HIV were killers.

This was an important undertaking, because with HIV, the whole notion of the germ theory of disease had escalated to new heights. A single germ was being blamed for immune suppression, from New York to Kampala.

With more laypeople and researchers becoming aware of the centrality of the germ-conquering natural immune system, the medical cartel played a trump card:

IT SAID IT HAD DISCOVERED A NEW GERM THAT WOULD CRASH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.

IT SAID: ALL YOUR IDEAS ABOUT THE IMMUNE SYSTEM ARE USELESS. THE IMMUNE SYSTEM CAN’T “REPLACE DOCTORS AND DRUGS” BY WARDING OFF GERMS IF IT IS BEING DESTROYED BY HIV. YOU SEE? A SINGLE GERM IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE WHOLE IMMUNE SYSTEM. THE GERM IS THE REAL PROBLEM. WE WIN, YOU LOSE.

That was their play. That was their game. That was their LIE. Actually, HIV wasn’t destroying or harming a single immune system on the planet, lies work when you have a whole propaganda system at your disposal.

The cartel had to cut off other competing theories that could move to center stage. The most important of these theories would focus on the immune system and how to strengthen it NATURALLY. This is an area in which the medical cartel has zero answers.

THIS is why the medical cartel is at war with natural health, which does have answers for building immune systems. THIS is why the FDA, a rogue criminal agency, is relentlessly attacking nutritional supplements, which can improve immune function. THIS is why the Codex group is making war against natural health. THIS is why WHO and the CDC must continue to invent and promote fake pandemics “caused by germs.” THEY ARE DEFENDING THEIR TURF BY ALL MEANS AVAILABLE.

This turf is founded on the central lie of germ-caused disease. The lie must be presented as truth. It must be told over and over again, in larger terms, in more frightening terms.

We have this pandemic. We have that pandemic. We have anther pandemic. Germs, germs, germs. Their propaganda.

Some years ago, I was invited to speak at a conference about my medical investigations. I talked about bird flu and SARS as phony epidemics. I spoke about the need to focus on the immune system and how to strengthen it. I noticed a preponderance of very fat people in the crowd. On their desks, they had full spreads of McDonalds and giant containers of Coke.

When the Q&A period came, they began peppering me with questions about all sorts of exotic and covert bio-weapons that might be in use and aimed at the population. I readily acknowledged that a few of these were out there. But I also stressed the importance of building strong immune systems.

My message began to get through, but judging by the squeamish expressions on the faces of the attendees, it wasn’t happy smiley message.

Is it possible to design various weapons that can sneak in under the immune system’s radar? Yes. Does this mean there is no need to understand what the medical cartel is really doing, day after, year after year, as the bodies pile up? Does this mean one should forget about trying to create a stronger immune system, since it might not be useful against certain exotic strategies? No.

The Matrix Revealed

Do you want to know the primary medical weapon that can, in fact, sneak in under the radar of the immune system?

The weapon that is hidden in plain view?

It’s vaccines. I’m not talking about strange biowar-engineered vaccines planted with super-secret elements.

I’m talking about run-of-the-mill every-day vaccines that are used across the world.

Because they are injected directly into the body, they bypass a number of normal layers of the body’s immune-defense system. They get into the bloodstream. Some of them cross the blood-brain barrier.

Now you are talking about a whole different scenario. This isn’t germs floating in the air or inherently existing in the body. This is a medical artifact, based on completely false science, whose effects are considerable and powerful, precisely because the route is injection.

Germs are injected. Chemicals are injected. Contaminated debris is injected.

A conspiracy doesn’t have to be extraordinarily arcane, complex, and super-secret to be devastating.

It can be, but it doesn’t have to be.

Some people are so enamored of the arcane, complex, and super-secret that they don’t care about the truth that is staring at them from across the table.

I’ll tell you something arcane and complex: the psychology by which the bigger and bigger and bigger lies, told right out in the open, are swallowed or ignored. This is a VERY interesting field of study, and I’ve been studying it ever since I wrote AIDS INC. in 1988. I had to.

Speaking as a reporter, it’s fascinating when you absolutely have the goods and deliver mind-boggling stories and revelations, when you think THIS IS IT, when you know this will torpedo the corrupt system down to its core…it’s fascinating to watch the response of blank faces.

I wish this experience for all of you. It’s tremendously instructive. It tells you so much more about mind control than all the hidden information about CIA MKULTRA. It tells you much about the human mind.

It’s why I decided to devote a great deal of time to investigating what has come to be called The Matrix. Now THAT’S complex.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

CNN GOES PSYCHOTIC ON BIN LADEN, VACCINES

CNN Goes Psychotic on Vaccines, Bin Laden

by Jon Rappoport

June 7, 2012

www.nomorefakenews.com

Maybe they’re dropping acid at CNN. But they’re running a story on how the killing of Bin Laden is tied to a recent “surge” in polio cases in Pakistan.

(CNN: “Bin Laden raid harms Pakistan polio fight”)

I’m not kidding. Here is the thread, such as it is. A Pakistani doctor, secretly working for the CIA, showed up at the bin Laden compound pretending he was promoting vaccinations against polio. He was really there to try to gain intel on the compound and who was living in it.

Since this has gone public, there is now a widespread fear of vaccination in Pakistan because, well, the whole effort to deliver shots to the population must be a CIA op.

This is why, medical authorities say, the people of Pakistan don’t want needles??

Actually, people everywhere are waking up to the fact that vaccines are toxic and ineffective.

The recent “incredible surge” in polio in Pakistan? 198 claimed cases.

Which proves that public health agencies will say ANYTHING to try to get people to take vaccines.

A little history helps here. In the US, in the early 1950s, as the first polio vaccine was being introduced, doctors were being paid $25 for every case of polio they diagnosed. In those days, that was a significant sum. So any patient who walked through the door of a doctor’s office with a slight limp or a fever or a sniffle risked the danger of a diagnosis. Naturally, these payoffs to physicians inflated the numbers of cases of polio being reported.

THEN, after the vaccine was put in play, health authorities changed the definition of polio. By the new standards, it was much harder to claim a person had polio, so case numbers dropped. Of course, the drop was attributed to the vaccine.

I explain all this in detail in my book, AIDS INC., which is a bonus included as an e-book, in my new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED. During the writing of the book, I interviewed Dr. Herbert Ratner who, during the 1950s, was the public health officer for Oak Park, Illinois. Ratner documented these scams at the time.

The whole issue of whether polio is even related to a virus has been shoved under the carpet and kept there for a long time. Here you should consult the unique research of Jim West, who wrote a stunning analysis, Images of Poliomyelitis, in the Townsend Letter for Doctors (June, 2000). West connects paralytic polio to the DDT pesticide, and earlier, to lead and arsenic pesticides.

The Matrix Revealed

Coming up to the present, recent revelations about the Bill Gates- sponsored polio vaccine in India are quite staggering. 47,000 cases of paralysis from the vaccine. They’re calling these “non-polio paralysis,” but it’s clear the vaccine has been doing the damage. Don’t worry. Bill is still smiling.

Ever since the advent of the germ theory of disease, germs have been used as cover stories to conceal the actual causes of illness and death. In the Third World, contaminated water supplies, lack of basic sanitation, overcrowding, chronic malnutrition and starvation, stolen farm land, and Western medical intervention with toxic drugs and vaccines are the true causes. They are conveniently unsolved, because it is in the interests of those in charge to maintain debilitated and weak populations.

I pointed this out in AIDS INC., as the HIV hysteria spread. HIV was the latest attempt to deflect attention from the truth. In the course of writing the book, I interviewed a doctor who had set up a small AIDS clinic in Uganda. He decided it would do no good to treat the patients with AZT, because they were too weak from lack of food. (Of course, AZT, a failed chemo drug, is perhaps the most toxic medicine ever released for public consumption.) So this doctor tried something unprecedented. He created a small farm, where food was grown to feed his patients.

Eventually, he said, they grew stronger AND ALL THEIR SO-CALLED AIDS SYMPTOMS DISAPPEARED. At this point, because he was a mainstream doctor, he was baffled. He didn’t know what to do. His people were now healthy. They had been diagnosed with a lethal disease. They “needed drugs.” But why? They were doing well.

It turns out that, in Africa, in 1985, a researcher named Serwadda wrote a paper in which he essentially reinterpreted all the usual symptoms of starvation, contaminated water, lack of sanitation as “slim disease,” and he claimed this wasting away was the result of HIV. From that moment on, the medical cartel had its cover story. The death-dealing hoax was in full bloom.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

www.nomorefakenews.com

Placebo, antibody, and the destiny of failure

by Jon Rappoport

November 24, 2010

(To join our email list, click here.)

Since my last several articles on medical rules of the game have evoked interest, I’ll take a few more steps.

As I mentioned, there is a fallacy buried in diagnostic tests that employ antibodies as the standard of measure. 

The presence of antibodies specific to a particular germ doesn’t automatically signify illness, and yet that is the interpretation being made these days.

This would be an interesting challenge:

A lab is given blood samples from a number of patients.  Each sample, it is found, indicates antibodies to germ X.  The lab must state whether these people are displaying symptoms of illness X.

By the rules, the answer would be yes in every case. Yet, the answer would be wrong in a majority of cases—perhaps in all cases.

Why?  Because naturally produced antibodies normally mean the person’s immune system has warded off the germ.

At this point, the lab might say, “Well, yes, but chances are these people will get sick.  It just hasn’t happened yet.  Or they have the disease without symptoms.”

These are not scientific statements.  One would have to follow the test cases for a while to see whether they get sick.  I would bet against it. In any event, a diagnosis of illness based on a positive antibody test is not about the future.  It’s about the present.  Public health agencies routinely count case numbers on the basis of antibody tests.  And the idea of a disease without symptoms is just a feint.  It’s a contradiction in terms.          

On to placebo.  In any serious controlled trial of a medical drug, there are two groups.  One group gets the drug; the other gets a sugar pill.  The reason for this practice has been obscured in modern times.  Actually, it is done because a certain percentage of people (around 20%) will get better no matter what you give them.  Therefore, the drug has to perform significantly better than the placebo.

However, we need to return to the medical origin of the placebo.  This is it: a country doctor, faced with a patient who was a hypochondriac, would hand him a sugar pill.  The patient would take it and then feel better.

But…you see, the patient believed he was getting effective medicine.  That’s what caused him to recover.

In a controlled trial, this is not the case.  The patient knows, beforehand, that he will get EITHER the medicine or a placebo.  This setting doesn’t provoke the same belief.  It’s different.  It’s weaker.

Therefore, one can expect that the “cure rate” in the placebo group will be lower than the normal 20%.  And, as a result, the actual drug will only need to meet a lower standard of success, relative to the results obtained by the placebo.

Bottom line?  A medical drug can test out with fewer positive outcomes to be deemed effective.  Unless someone decides that the placebo group performed in an unexpected manner—but who cares about that when the goal is to establish that the drug is a winner?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

FALSE SCIENCE FOR THE MASSES

DECEMBER 21, 2009.  In modern times, false science is based on the notion that “overwhelming consensus” rules.

That’s the mantra.  ALL THE EXPERTS AGREE, so how could the truth be any different?

The mantra is recited as if the scientific method really IS about experts agreeing and NOTHING ELSE.

To deconstruct this idiocy, consider, first of all, that a few leaders can always affect the outlook of the many, even in the fields of scientific research.

If the top journals align themselves with a few “experts,” then the mid-range “semi-experts” will fall into line.  If they don’t, they won’t get their papers published.

Then, we have the closely related funding game.  The researchers who get grants to carry out their studies, so they can publish those studies, must follow the party line in their conclusions; otherwise, no $$ to do further studies.

These are the hard facts of life.

For example, in March of 1987, Peter Duesberg, a world-renowned molecular biologist, managed to get a paper published on the subject of HIV.  He offered evidence to suggest that HIV didn’t cause AIDS.

From that moment on, he was hounded by the “top experts,” there was no rational debate on his points, and eventually his funding and status at UC Berkeley were greatly diminished.

By this process, scientific dissidents in many fields are weeded out and sidelined, and then power players can say, “Well, the consensus is overwhelming in the direction of our conclusions.”  Yes, but the consensus is false and artificial and distorted and manufactured.

“We killed our enemies.  Now, we can write history, and we will be the consensus.”

Early in the 20th century, there was widespread Pellagra in the American South.  This skin disease was found, in 1915, to be caused by a deficiency in niacin.  However, for 20 more years, the experts refused to consider this simple cause and cure, and persisted in trying to find the germ that was at the root of Pellagra.  The consensus was wrong.

In the 1970s, a terrible neurological affliction dubbed SMON was prevalent in Japan.  Researchers, once again, were determined to find a germ cause.  However, through the heroic efforts of a few rebels, challenging the consensus, the problem was finally pinned down to a medical drug, clioquinol, manufactured by Ciba-Geigy.  A landmark court case settled the issue.

People insist that manmade global warming is threatening the planet.  Why?  Well, THE EXPERTS AGREE.  Therefore, it must be so. 

The reliance on consensus carried the day during the scourge of Pellagra and SMON, too, and many gullible people rode along on that tide, until the truth emerged.  They, too, said THE EXPERTS AGREE—until the experts were shown to be wrong.

In 2003, amid much media fanfare, a new disease was announced: SARS.  It was coming out of Asia, to the West, and it could decimate populations.  Medical researchers at 11 World Health Organization labs, linked by a closed Internet connection, worked furiously and came up with the cause: a so-called coronavirus.  No other labs were allowed to participate in this work.  In other words, a consensus was developed within a small circle.

But because the World Health Organization was in charge, the coronavirus finding was given top billing.

A few months later, it was discovered that many patients in Canada being diagnosed with SARS had no trace of this virus in their bodies. 

And finally, when all was said and done, and the hysteria died down, the official death figure, globally, for SARS was 262. 

Yet even today, there is still a consensus that SARS was a genuine epidemic.  “The experts agree.”

So there is science, and there is science for the masses.  In the latter version, manufactured consensus is all that’s required. 

Manmade global warming was, until recently, looked upon by most people as solid evidence-based science.  Now, the united front is splitting apart.  The skeletons are falling out of the closet.  The rational challenges are severe. 

All this should not come as a shock, but to most people, it does.  They have fallen under the spell of PR.  They believe it when the experts attack the skeptics as “denialists.”  They think the battle is between science and fundamentalist superstition.  But that’s one of the goals of the PR: to place all skeptics in the worst possible light.

The global-warming “experts” don’t want honest debate.  They simply want to say the debate is over and science has triumphed.  They have a kingdom to defend, and they do it by spewing generalities.

EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING.

EXPERTS AGREE.

WE’RE LONG PAST THE NEED FOR DISCUSSION.

THE SKEPTICS ARE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED.

IF WE DON’T TAKE ACTION NOW, WE’LL LOSE THE PLANET.

THE SKY IS FALLING.

It’s not going to work. 

JON RAPPOPORT

www.nomorefakenews.com

Consider supporting Jon’s work by doing your shopping through Jon’s Amazon link.