Category Archives: Bordergate

Will Europe crumble and disappear?

Will Europe crumble and disappear?

by Jon Rappoport

August 24, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

These are notes from my work-in-progress, The Underground:

“The open-door immigration policy of the European Union is justified by pointing out Europe’s guilt for past colonial sins. Well, I have news. You can go anywhere in the world, focus in on any nation, any tribe, and you can discover that, at some point in the past, they did grievous harm to some other group, nation, tribe, or to their own people. You can use history to claim that everybody should give back everything to everybody else. Everybody should be down on their knees, weeping and gnashing their teeth and giving away all they have. Stimulating guilt in order to seize and maintain power is a strategy as old as the hills, but the current generation seems never to have heard of it.”

“Under the corrupt banner of the European Union, the whole continent is now seen as a giant charity agency; the receiving ward for waves of immigrants who, for any reason, want to arrive and settle. The past brilliance and innovation of Europe now is relegated to myth. Saving everyone—an impossible feat—is on the table. Of course, Europe as humanitarian messiah is a piece of propaganda, nothing more. The actual intent is wiping out separate European nations and their traditions. But this is not supposed to be discussed.”

“The EU is the fulfillment of various master plans. One continent, under one government and one economy. Instead of waving the sword of conquest, the strategy is ‘share and care’, ‘greatest good for the greatest number’.”

“Make a list of the great European artists and inventors of the last 10 centuries. Those names are now irrelevant. It’s a fascist felony to invoke them. They’re just distractions from the modern crusade: save the whole world. Give up everything in the process. The Utopians are at it again, spinning their fantasies for the gullible, while planning how to make their iron hammer bigger. No wonder the Roman Church is on board.”

“The Global Citizen as a role is a now an artifice. It’s a stripped-down, brain-addled position to be occupied by a bureaucratic functionary. With a few Disneyesque slogans, he’s off and running, saving this and that. The young think they’re discovering ‘the real road to salvation’, which no one has ever conceived of before. And the European Union is the extended modern ‘body of Christ’.”

“This dream of One Europe is not new. Men we might otherwise consider brilliant have touted it as ‘the solution’. James Joyce: ‘If Ireland is to become a new Ireland she must first become European’. Winston Churchill: ‘If Europe were once united in the sharing of its common inheritance there would be no limit to the happiness, the prosperity, and the glory which its 300,000,000 or 400,000,000 people would enjoy’. Victor Hugo: ‘No more frontiers! The Rhine for everyone! Let us be the same Republic, let us be the United States of Europe, let us be the continental federation, let us be European liberty, let us be universal peace’! —But how easy it is to anticipate the ACTUAL outcome of this vision, knowing it is placed in the hands of corporate, government, and banker mafia-bosses.”

“The primary purpose of the French citizen and the German citizen and the British citizen is not ‘loving each other’. It is not their destiny to melt into one cheese Glob.”

“Throughout Europe’s history, despite the wars of blood, great men and women have appeared in its midst. They have forwarded freedom and invention. They were beyond notions of restrictive nationality, but that does not mean they were pan-Europeans. They weren’t striving to build one political system for the continent. They exemplified liberation. By and for the individual.”

“Killing Europe is the Globalist dream. Reducing it to one welfare state, drained of all ambition, is the strategy. Ruling it as a police state, on behalf of a ‘worker’s paradise’, is the end-game.”

“In the late 18th century, America’s first foreign policy rule was to avoid Europe, with its secret alliances and wars. But in the emergence of the American Republic, the first acknowledgement was to Europe, where the foundation for individual liberty was built. What Europe achieved, in that regard, was no accident. It was the end result of a centuries-long struggle. But now the leaders of Europe are determined to throw all that away. To bury the history, as if it had never happened. If there is any alliance between America and Europe now, it should be based on the original vision of individual liberty. That connection should be forged again.”

“Under the top-heavy national governments of Europe, and under the massive EU bureaucracy that sits on top of the governments, the message to the population of Europe is clear: ‘Keep your eyes straight ahead, fit into your slot, don’t dissent, and collect as many government freebies as you can. Cede your individual power to the collective, and take heart in the fact that your participation in the whole is a heroic act—because the whole collective IS the hero.’ Really? Any child should be able to see though that formulation in a few seconds.”

“Anyone who believes the entire reason for Europe opening its doors wide, to unlimited migration, is payment for past colonial sins, committed in other parts of world, should take a look at Angela Merkel, one of the foremost proponents of unlimited immigration. Do you really think she is trying to atone for the past? She is an agent of Globalism. She is carrying out that agenda.”

“Once a top-heavy all-encompassing national government takes power, it’s an easy step to imposing a still higher level of control—in this case, the EU. Why not? The citizens have already been entrained to accept autocratic rule from above—just add another layer. Few people will notice it. It’s more of the same. The people keep believing they’re getting marvelous goodies for free, even as they’re paying higher taxes. The transition from “free individual” to “citizen” is a given. And citizens eventually think of themselves as PARTS OF A WHOLE. Massive propaganda assures them that this conception is SPIRITUAL. This is what the cosmos wants. This is what the cosmos is.”

“It would be interesting to do a poll in the street, based on the following statement: ‘We’re getting people to sign a petition to eliminate the word INDIVIDUAL, because the needs of everybody come first, because we have to think of what is good for everyone…’ How many people would jump on board?”

“Europe is becoming a ghost of its former self. The former self has less and less influence, because fewer people remember or understand what it was, what it meant. This is no accident. Education is the tool for forgetting. WE ARE SEEKING APPLICANTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF AMNESIA. ALL ARE WELCOME.”

“Shakespeare? Bach? Goethe? Mozart? Raphael? Rembrandt? Degas? Yeats? Who were they? Who cares? We have different problems now. The only people who can solve them are our leaders. We need more equality. We need to make sure everyone is the same.”

“In the former Soviet Union, if you lived in an apartment building where garbage accumulated and stank on the stairs, you left it there, because your neighbor, living in the next building over, had garbage on his stairs. If you removed yours, it would make him look bad. This is where Europe is heading.”

“John Locke? Albert Camus? Rimbaud? Cezanne? Jane Austen? Are they EU Commissioners? Are they doing a good job?”

“It will be seen that, if person A can read, and person B can’t, person A has an unfair advantage, which he gained through illegitimate ‘privilege’. Therefore, instead of person B learning to read, the smoother course will be to make person A’s advantage meaningless. How will this be done? By engineering a future in which no one needs to read. A top-heavy bureaucracy always brings about a generalized solution.”

Exit From the Matrix

“Why, for example, should the Scandinavian countries have their own languages? This surely creates barriers. However, instituting and teaching one new language for everyone presents problems. The answer? Create a future in which language is barely necessary. Half the citizens will arrange and monitor the lives of the other half, by pressing keys on machines. The details of the plan? The EU will eventually work them out.”

“The EU will bring in a new money system: every person who resides on the continent will receive a basic income. He/she can spend that digital credit as desired. A bell will ring in some store or on some website when a person’s credit account reaches zero. And when enough zeroes are attained, people will riot and demand further income. Their wishes will be granted, as long as they don’t leave their homes after 8PM.”

“All Europeans will, in one way or another, as direct employees or contractors, work for the EU. Of course, work will be defined as: whatever you can get away with. Because no one will care.”

“There is no algorithm that can predict the precise moment when Europeans will have had enough. But there is such a moment. At that point, large numbers of people will begin remembering that Europe once had its greatnesses. And they will be willing to imagine new greatness in terms that crack the pillars and the foundations stones of the EU. This will mark the return of the individual.”

But why wait? Wait for what?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

Vicente Fox’s immigration gibberish

by Jon Rappoport

May 16, 2016

(To join our email list, click here.)

Vicente Fox (twitter) is two important things: the former President of Mexico, and the former head of all Coca Cola operations in Mexico.

Over the last few months, he’s made several statements about Trump and immigration:

“I’m not going to pay for that fucking wall.”

“He [Trump] is the hated gringo because he’s attacking all of us, he’s offending all of us, I mean imagine – that could take us to a war – not to a trade war…Don’t play around with us. We can jump walls. We can swim rivers. And we can defend ourselves.”

Regardless of what you think about immigration or Trump, there are a few points to remember about Vicente Fox and the history of Mexico.

First, Fox, on his mother’s side, is Spanish. As in: she comes from Spain.

From biography.yourdictionary.com: “He [Fox] was born July 2, 1942 in Mexico City but was raised on a communal farm in the state of Guanajuato near Leon. His father was a rancher of Irish descent and his mother came from Spain.” (Oh, wikipedia update: “The family was unaware of its German origins and they believed the Fox family [on Vicente’s father’s side] had their origins in Ireland until it was discovered otherwise later in Fox’s life.”)

What difference does that make? The bottom-line argument for UNLIMITED Mexican immigration is based on history: namely, the Mexican-American War of 1846-48, and the peace treaty that surrendered Mexican California, plus territories east of California, to the United States—and solidified the US hold on Texas.

So the current immigration flood has the goal of “taking back what rightfully belongs to Mexico.”

Except for one other historical fact: starting in 1519, Mexico no longer belonged to the native Aztec population. It was grabbed by force. The Spanish conquistadors won a war and overthrew the Aztec empire.

So if you want to argue history, “native Mexicans” aren’t “winning back Mexico for themselves.” If immigration means winning, it’s on behalf of the men who took control of Mexico: Spanish conquerors.

Again, on his mother’s side, Vicente Fox is Spanish. He isn’t a “native Mexican.” Not even close.

Indeed, native Mexicans have been buried at the bottom of the political structure in their own country for five centuries.

If you want to say that unlimited immigration will somehow win back Mexico’s lost territories in the US, be accurate. Immigration will win back the territories for the descendants of the Spanish conquistadors.

But Vicente Fox has other matters to explain as well, and they have to do with the effects of the Coca Cola Company on native Mexicans. Remember, he was, for a time, the head of all Coke operations in Mexico. Here, from a stunning article at mexicolapchs.blogspot.com (“Coca-Cola’s Exploitation of Mexico,” 5/8/2011), is another piece of history, this one more recent:

“While having a tight grip on the native people, Coca-Cola managed to exploit Mexican land and its natural resources. ‘Coke is also widely produced in Mexico, an arrangement that is threatening the country’s water supplies and undercutting indigenous control of natural resources. It takes three cups of water to make one cup of Coke’… As Coca-Cola is using up Mexico’s water supply to produce Coke, they are limiting water for the native people, forcing them to consume more Coke. Health issues like diabetes and obesity began to worsen as more Coke was consumed because of the sugar and caffeine intake.”

“Without natural resources to provide a healthy diet, the Mexican people resorted to drinking only Coke which caused a rise in diabetes and obesity. Due to Coca-Cola’s economic venture, Mexico must cope with its depleted resources, disintegrating government, and mistreatment of the people. If Coca-Cola continues their profit making schemes, the people of Mexico will have no control over their own government and land. Their water supply will ultimately be destroyed and the health of the people will plummet.”

If Vicente Fox is arguing on behalf of “true Mexicans,” he should look to his own past, and the grotesque effects his company has had on that population.

If you opened up the major media to authentic original Mexicans, with no Spanish descendants of the conquistadors on board, the first thing the native Mexicans would begin talking about is the 500-year suppression of their rights and lives in their own land, right down to the present day. They wouldn’t be talking about immigration to the United States.

The native Mexicans would have very interesting things to say. Their statements would cut to the bone of Mexican history, the real history. Not the laid-on Spanish history.

And if justice were the objective, it would begin right there.

It definitely doesn’t begin with anything Vicente Fox has to say.

The argument for unlimited immigration, based on history, is spurious from the get-go. And if you want to go back to the native Aztecs, even there you’re talking about people who took over large territories and populations by conquest.

Who the Aztecs’ native Mexican victims were, at that time, I’ll leave for scholars and historians to sort out. Whoever they were, if you can find them in Mexico today, they have zero political or economic power. They’re at the bottom, where they’ve lived for a long, long, long time. And their need starts with what the leaders in Mexico (not the US) have been doing to them:

Burying them.

You just might find a few descendants of original Mexicans growing corn in their native land. That’s possible. And if you did, you’d immediately run into the effects that NAFTA, the 1994 Globalist treaty, has had on them. It put 1.5 million of them into bankruptcy, because NAFTA permitted the US to export cheap corn to Mexico. That’s why many of those farmers have been crossing the border and coming up into the US.

Yes, NAFTA, the treaty that Vicente Fox has called “a miracle,” and a “total success.”

The man can tap dance. I’ll give him that.

Coda: In case you think giant tracts of land in California, with their sprawling estate villas, were once owned by original Mexicans, from whom Imperialist Yankees stole those properties in the settlement of the Mexican-American War, think again. There was a time (19th and early 20th century) when remaining wealthy Mexican families in California were giving each other islands off the coast, as wedding presents for their sons and daughters—but these were really Spanish landowners. They were the descendants of 1519 Hernan Cortes, Juan Diaz, Andres de Tapia, Garcia del Pilar, Francisco de Aguilar, Pedro Alvarado, and their merry band of marauders who stole central Mexico, spread their influence, and kept the native population under their rule, deep under their rule.

I once lived on Alvarado Street in Los Angeles. Only decades later did I realize this name was no holdover from, or recognition of, Mexico. It was apparently a reference to Juan Bautista Alvarado, Governor of Alta California (1836-42). It pointed to “Spanish Mexico.” As in: Spain.

Conquest.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

The people who want unlimited immigration from Mexico to the US should keep that in mind. Arguing from history brings up some unpleasant truths.

According to ancestry.com, the most common surnames (2013) are Garcia, Fernandez, Gonzales, Rodriguez, Lopez, Martinez, Sanchez, Perez, Martin, Gomez—these are the most common names in…

Spain.

That tells you something about who has really been running Mexico since the early 16th century.

It isn’t the native Mexicans.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Sharyl Attkisson reports shocking US immigration stats

Sharyl Attkisson reports shocking US immigration stats

Plus: the Bernie Sanders/Donald Trump divide-and-conquer operation

by Jon Rappoport

March 16, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

In a column on her site (“Fact Check: Media claims that Trump is anti-immigrant,” 3/13/2016), ex-CBS News investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, writes:

“For example, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reported that 2013 and 2014 alone, it set loose in the U.S. more than 66,500 illegal immigrant criminals who had been arrested in the U.S. for additional crimes and had over 166,000 convictions among them: 30,000 for drunk or drugged driving, 414 kidnappings, 11,301 rapes or other types of assaults and 395 homicides. In a fairly short time period, ICE reported 2,423 of those illegal immigrant criminals had already been rearrested and convicted of new crimes in the U.S.– including felonies and gang offenses.”

I queried Attkisson about those 66,500 illegal immigrants’ 166,000 convictions. Did the convictions take place in their home countries before they came to the US? This was her reply:

“The [166,000] crimes were committed here in US —NOT in their home country. We don’t know about crimes they committed in their home country. These are people who were jailed here NOT for being illegal, but for additional crimes they committed here after coming illegally. Then they were released instead of deported or kept in prison…”

But you see, statistics like these can act as a bias against open borders and unlimited immigration. Therefore…

The numbers must be discounted. They must be ignored. Otherwise, one could be accused of intolerance, at the very least.

Actually, with open borders and no limitation on immigration, why are Mexico and US separate countries? Of course. Let’s have Mexerica or Americo and be done with it. That’ll solve the whole problem all at once.

Vicente Fox, the former head of Coca Cola operations in Latin America (a very healthy beverage), and former President of Mexico, who recently said, “I’m not going to pay for that fucking wall,” once suggested Mexico and the US should erase the border between them and form a bond with Canada, much like the European Union. He was right on the money. Mega-corporate Globalist money.

Consider the NAFTA trade treaty and the Rockefeller Globalists, who sit above this whole fray; and how they have helped cause a human flood at the southern US border.

Two years ago, on the 20th anniversary of NAFTA, Lori Wallach, of Public Citizen, wrote, at the Huffington Post (“NAFTA at 20: One Million U.S. Jobs Lost, Higher Income Inequality,” 1/6/2014):

“…outcomes include a staggering $181 billion U.S. trade deficit with NAFTA partners Mexico and Canada and the related loss of 1 million net U.S. jobs under NAFTA, growing income inequality, displacement of more than one million Mexican campesino farmers and a doubling of desperate immigration from Mexico…”

Nice and neat.

This is an elite Globalist operation on behalf of chaos.

power outside the matrix

A final note, concerning the loss of 1 million US jobs Lori Wallach mentioned. We’re talking about angry people. Some of them have gone over to Bernie Sander’s side, and some of them to Trump, because both men are talking about the loss of US jobs owing to horrendous Globalist trade treaties. These displaced out-of-work Americans are now opposing each other in the election season.

That’s a fine example of divide and conquer.

Who benefits? Hillary Clinton (rabid Globalist).

If only one highly visible anti-trade-treaty candidate were running in this Presidential election, who knows much support he might gain, as more and more Americans wake up to how they’re being used, abused, and cast aside during the march to the Globalists’ tune?

But when split apart between two oddball candidates (Trump and Sanders), who are polar opposites, anti-Globalist Americans battle each other, fracture the power they could amass together, and bury the victory they need—the victory everybody needs.

If Hillary Clinton coughs, splutters, grins, and cackles her way into the Oval Office in November, the divide-and-conquer op will have been successful.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Trump vs. Pope: the cowboy vs. the head of Pedophile Central

Trump vs. Pope: the cowboy vs. the head of Pedophile Central

by Jon Rappoport

February 19, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Let’s try to assess US immigration policy vs. Vatican immigration policy.

Just a thought. Might turn up something. Who knows?

I notice the Vatican has a wall. A big high wall. It’s probably just a decorative feature, but I’ll take a wild guess and say it also tends to keep people out. Walls sometimes have that effect. I’m not sure why. It’s one of the enduring mysteries.

The Washington Times, 9/24/2015, “Pope’s call for immigration leniency unlikely to change debate”:

“The Vatican, for its part, welcomes millions of visitors a year — but allows only a very select few, who meet strict criteria, to be admitted as residents or citizens. Only about 450 of its 800 or so residents actually hold citizenship, according to a 2012 study by the Library of Congress.”

All right. So the Vatican (which is actually a nation) has, what, two or three immigrants?

James Robb, writing at thesocialcontract.com (“How Many Immigrants Does Vatican City Take?”), puts it bluntly:

“What it [Vatican City] does not have is any immigrants. Nor refugees. None.”

What about US immigration? Here’s an overall statement from migrationpolicy.org, “Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States”:

“In 2013, approximately 41.3 million immigrants lived in the United States, an all-time high for a nation historically built on immigration.

“The United States remains a popular destination attracting about 20 percent of the world’s international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population.

“Immigrants accounted for 13 percent of the total 316 million U.S. residents; adding the U.S.-born children (of all ages) of immigrants means that approximately 80 million people, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population, is either of the first or second generation.”

Got that? Depending on how you want to look at it, the number is between 40 and 80 million immigrants.

So: Vatican immigration vs. US immigration? The math- comparison isn’t hard to make, even for people raised in the American school system.

But of course, the Pope has to take a shot at Trump and the idea of building a wall between Mexico and America. Naturally. Why? Well, Virginia, if you really want to know the naked truth…

The Pope, like his predecessors, wants unlimited immigration because it obviously leads to chaos. That’s why. It’s quite simple, when you boil it down.

The Roman Church, you see, has always thrived in periods of chaos. Tumult. Conflict. Expanding poverty. The Church knows chaos. It’s built to handle it.

Widespread prosperity? No. It’s not made for that kind of future. Burgeoning prosperity is the enemy, before which the Church shrivels.

The Pope, as a contributing member and executive of Globalism, Inc., has the job of spreading poverty and lowered living standards wherever possible—because that is the world he and the Rockefeller Globalists are promoting.

Unlimited immigration is a gigantic con job, dressed up to look like heraldic humanitarianism—and of course the rubes and yokels and wild-eyed kiddie idealists fall for it like sugar freaks at a candy convention. The model is Hope and Spare Change.

Again, the real purpose of limitless immigration is chaos—behind which the heavy Globalist hitters come in and install their kind of order. Tight. Very tight. Top-down. It’s an old formula.

That’s why the Pope speaks about the climate-change agenda as well, which equals, when you strip away the messianic nonsense, lowered energy production for the whole planet. Further grinding poverty, from Nome to Tierra del Fuego.

Do I really have to point out that anyone dressed up in a robe and a tall hat, riding in a bubble, who is infallible and heads up a flock of 1.25 billion people, is suspect?

Moving right along, you might look at this quote from AP/CBS News, 5/17/2014, “Vatican reveals how many priests defrocked for sex abuse since 2004”:

“The Vatican revealed Tuesday that over the past decade, it has defrocked 848 priests who raped or molested children and sanctioned another 2,572 with lesser penalties, providing the first ever breakdown of how it handled the more than 3,400 cases of abuse reported to the Holy See since 2004.”

Yes, and how many cases have gone unreported, or were concealed by the Church? Notice, too, the penalties for the criminal priests: being fired from the job (defrocking), and “lesser” discomforts (lifetime penance and prayer).

The current Pope has spoken out against these crimes, but what has he actually done about them?

Time Magazine, February 11, 2016, “Catholic Church Tells Bishops They Are Not Obliged to Disclose Child Sex Abuse: Report”:

“The Catholic Church is allegedly telling newly ordained bishops that they have no obligation to report child-sexual-abuse allegations to law-enforcement officials, saying instead that the decision to take such claims to the authorities should be left to victims and their families.

“The policy was first reported by a veteran Vatican journalist at Catholic news website Crux, who cited a presentation given by French Monsignor Tony Anatrella.

“Anatrella, a consultant to the Pontifical Council for the Family and the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers, also authored a training document for new bishops released by Church authorities last week, in which similar guidelines are laid out.

‘“According to the state of civil laws of each country where reporting is obligatory, it is not necessarily the duty of the bishop to report suspects to authorities, the police or state prosecutors in the moment when they are made aware of crimes or sinful deeds,’ his document states, according to a citation in the Guardian.”

Really, Pope Francis?

the matrix revealed

Maybe His Eminence should worry about putting his own house in order. Perhaps, safely tucked away inside Vatican City, he’ll have time to contemplate the number of immigrants his City admits versus the number of pedophile priests in his worldwide operation versus the number of victims of those priests.

Then he might come up with a formula suggesting priorities.

Instead of jabbering about a nation in which 40-80 million immigrants already reside.

Don’t hold out hope, though. After the lights go down in Vatican City, I’m sure those esteemed prelates regale each other with stories of the desolate Middle Ages, when Church power really meant something…and how they long and plan for a return to those glory days as partners now in Globalism Inc.

When the masks come off.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Since when is limiting immigration a crime?

Since when is limiting immigration a crime?

And since when is bombing and invading other countries a virtuous act?

by Jon Rappoport

January 25, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Double trouble.

Somehow, putting a lid on immigration is now a crime against humanity. That’s quite a propaganda triumph. So let’s announce, with a great flourish, that the US and Europe will welcome everybody else on the planet. Let’s go all the way to prove our tolerance and good will. Why not? The wonderful people who support waves of immigration don’t seem to be able to put a top number on this whole operation. They have a bone stuck in their throats. They can’t say, “Well, here is the absolute highest number of immigrants who can come in.” They just can’t. To do so would taint the quality of their heroic empathy. It would rip a hole in their Sails of Love.

“Mr. President, perhaps you could tell us how many immigrants we can admit to our shores. When would it start being a, you know, problem? We just want to get an idea of the scope of this whole thing. When do the numbers begin to exert a strain on the economy, for example? Aside from, ahem, now. At what point do you suppose the number of criminals among the immigrants will cause, what shall I call it, serious trouble? When will the resettling of these millions of people into communities start to crack and disrupt and destroy the coherence of those communities? I mean, there must be a number beyond which it’s unwise to go. Isn’t that the way the world generally works? Too much of anything becomes dangerous. Too many militarized policemen, too much surveillance, too much CIA interference in other countries, too many corporate lobbyists, too many US-backed ISIS fighters, too many leaking cylinders of nuclear waste, too much pressure on a power plant during an earthquake. So how about a top-limit immigration number? Does a person who just asks for such a figure automatically qualify as a satanic messenger from Hell? Just trying to get a feel for the landscape of this issue…if there is a landscape.”

No-top-number is called a clue. The people who should be giving one but aren’t are either deranged love addicts or conscious agents of destruction.

Another clue: claiming, with a straight face, that granting all sorts of government benefits to immigrants as soon as they cross the border is in no way an inducement for them to show up.

As I’ve explained in previous articles, the whole “wave of migration” is an op. It’s not meant to be humane. It’s meant to destabilize societies and countries, bring on chaos, destroy traditional cultures and borders, and permit Globalization to advance.

Now let’s go to the other side.

Surely, moving into foreign nations with planes and bombs and drones and soldiers (Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc.) in no way creates a desire for retaliation in those populations. Right? Right? Why should it? Why should a little thing like raining down death and destruction induce a ripple of protest? Why should we expect anyone coming here, from those places, to have any anger whatsoever in his heart?

Likewise, in the area of economic warfare, if some Globalist trade treaty (NAFTA) sets up a long con whereby cheap US corn floods Mexico and puts 1.5 million Mexican farmers into bankruptcy, why should we think any of those people would harbor resentment against America, or come across the border, out of desperation, and with ill-will in their hearts? Again, absurd. Right?

Let’s go all the way back to US economic sanctions against Iraq (1990-2003). As a result, during that period, an estimated 500,000 Iraqi children died. Five-hundred thousand. But why would that be a problem? Why would that cause any resentment in the Middle East region?

And the participation of European countries in similar “misadventures,” via NATO, for example, and extending back into the Colonial period…who could think any resentment in the affected populations would pop up and endure?

This entire immigration issue has two sides. Obviously, one of the great tasks of politicians is to separate them and obscure any connection—while taking the precise wrong position about each side.

How did that happen? When you cut through the nonsense and the lies, the answer is clear. The politicians (those who are even aware) are in the Globalist camp. They want to make wars of conquest, profit, and extreme destabilization, on the one hand; and they want to open the floodgates to waves of immigrants, in order to destabilize their own countries—because the Globalist agenda demands an end to separate nations, all nations, in favor of much larger regions which, in a state of chaos, “must be brought under control by a higher force.”

This is the op, and it has been for a long time.

If there is any genuine leadership to be found—the authentic kind, not the devious type—it must come from people who grasp both sides of the insanity, are willing to expose it, and are determined to end it.

Politics, as we know it from long experience, is not the art of compromise. It’s the art of walling off one side of a covert operation from another, and pretending there is no conceivable connection. It’s the art of concealing the overall agenda. It’s the art of co-opting and corrupting innocent ideals, like “give us your huddled masses yearning to be free,” and turning them into monstrous elements of destruction—and in the process, enlisting naïve believers to move toward the cliff’s edge.

Key political leaders understand all that, because they’re fronting for elites who demand duplicity in all things.

the matrix revealed

Both A (wars of profit and destabilization) and B (unlimited immigration) are two parts of the whole, C, which is the artificial and forced Globalist cohesion/unification of the planet—indivisible, under one governing management system.

People who can comprehend this are able to hold two concepts in their minds at the same time and connect them. Unfortunately, the education system is restricted to teaching students how to hold one (bad) idea in the mind, and then turn that into a vague narrative about victimhood and shout it from rooftops. This is now apparently the peak accomplishment of Western civilization.

Of course, this version of education has nothing to do with the fact that our political leaders are pursuing a lunatic goal of societal destruction and need massive numbers of brain-addled zombies to accept the program as humane and brilliant. Of course not. Why would there be any connection?

Don’t worry, be happy. Find a way to be dependent on the government and all will be well. As the Dodo said in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, “Everybody has won, and all must have prizes.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

If Obama gave this speech instead

If Obama gave this Thanksgiving day speech instead

by Jon Rappoport

November 28, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

What Obama actually said: “Nearly four centuries after the Mayflower set sail, the world is still full of pilgrims – men and women who want nothing more than the chance for a safer, better future for themselves and their families. What makes America America is that we offer that chance.” Barack Obama, Weekly Address to the nation, urging Americans to welcome Syrian immigrants.

Pilgrims. Ah yes. You know, the Thanksgiving connection. And not to worry, the White House assures us that the Justice Dept., Homeland Security, and Scrooge McDuck will scrutinize every Syrian coming into the US before granting “asylum.”

But suppose Obama gave another speech, a quite different speech instead, for the sake of clarity:

“Look, when I talk about refugees coming here from ‘war-torn’ Syria, I’m really referring to how my administration helped tear down Syria by backing ISIS. Understand that. We gave them money and weapons. In fact, we played a major role in creating ISIS in the first place. Everybody knows that, it just hasn’t reached the level of the network evening news. But I thought you should be aware. That’s the main difference between the Syrian immigrants and the Pilgrims. We didn’t go over to England in the 17th century and rip up that country, forcing people to come over here.

“And while I’m at it, I may as well admit that not all those folks coming here from Syria are fleeing war. Some of them just want to attack us. They’re ISIS people—and we played an instrumental role in creating them.

“So before you go all limp with sympathy and generosity and humanitarian ding-dong, welcoming people into your home, realize the facts. This is an op. I and my people ramped up the war in Syria, and the overflow of immigrants is the result. Get it? I mean, come on. Can’t you people think?

“In the waning days of my Presidency, I want to gain some admiration for what I’ve really been doing, instead of what you think I’ve been doing. So stop with the ‘huddled masses yearning to be free’ stuff. That’s not it, okay? That was never it, during my Presidency.

“As far as Mexico is concerned, and the flood of people coming here, do you really believe I don’t understand the consequences? Do you think I’m that dense? These people and their children will be Democrat voters on into the future. That’s one thing. And they’ll put tremendous destructive pressure on the economies of the various states where they wind up. Stop pretending that isn’t true. Also, they’ll swamp social services. That’s already happening. They’ll take jobs from Americans. I get all that. I know that. I’m a smart guy. I’m not the messiah, I’m really not.

“So, try to track with me, please. If I know all this stuff, it follows that I’m doing it on purpose. Right? I want all these consequences. Why in the world would you think otherwise? Are you that naïve? Are you on drugs? Try to get where I’m coming from. I want to induce chaos. I’m that guy.

“Another thing. The TPP? You’ve heard of it? The enormous Globalist trade deal I’m pushing through to completion? It’ll send more American jobs out of the country. That’s what all the trade deals do. They reduce employment at home. I’m heavily in favor of the trade treaties. Therefore? Think. Come on. What’s my real position here? I want those consequences. More poverty at home, more chaos. This isn’t high-IQ stuff.

“I tell you, it’s a real pain in the ass when people can’t admire you for what you’re doing. The whole religious-adoration thing, early on in my career? That was nice. It was a plus. And it was necessary at the time. But now, I’m a two-term President. I’ve been through it. I don’t need that anymore. Now I need recognition for what I’ve really been up to.

“Clinton had his way of producing chaos. So did Bush. So do I. We’re erasing one America and installing another America. Is that so hard to see? I could go on for hours about what I’ve really been up to these past seven years, but I don’t want to overwhelm your tender sensibilities.”

—end of speech—

the matrix revealed

Sometimes we need a breath of fresh air. No President will ever deliver a speech like this, but we can do it for him. And then realize that, for once, he’s telling the truth.

Through us.

Back in the mists of time, the “through us” part was put forward as the whole idea behind representative (and severely limited) government.

Even if it was a fiction then, it was, in its words, a good idea. Better than most.

Why should people continue to make excuses for Presidents? Why not translate what they’re saying into what they really mean?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Sweden: test case for the new utopia

Sweden: test case for the new utopia

by Jon Rappoport

November 6, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“I have never written a word with the intent to make people fearful. I believe, and will always believe, that the individual can triumph, no matter what circumstances surround him, if he knows what he is, what he is capable of, and the creative force he possesses.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Note: This article is based on non-mainstream reports and sources who are decidedly independent of the Swedish establishment. Why is it necessary to hunt for facts? Because news is being suppressed.

The population of Sweden? 9.5 million people.

Only 9.5 million.

This should give you some idea about what is happening there, at ground level, as the migrant wave sweeps in.

There are also restrictions on what Swedes can say about the invasion. Political correctness rules. If this isn’t troubling, I don’t know what is.

As usual, politicians and various “community leaders” have jumped on the immigration bandwagon. At minimum, they have lost their minds. I see no coherent assessment of what effect migration will actually have on the economy—especially in a country famous for giving everything away.

Free government services are paid for by taxes. Let’s not forget that. So the extremely high tax rate will jump even higher.

I’m reading reports of violence and rape in Sweden—crimes committed by the new immigrants. From what I gather, even speaking about or publicizing these crimes is a violation.

From what I’ve learned about Sweden over the last 50 years, it’s clear the prevalent attitude of “it’s all good, things are fine, people are nice” is now being layered over the current migration crisis—which would be the equivalent of somehow seeing rainbows festooned with cupids in the middle of a hurricane tearing roofs off houses.

And yet this crisis is still being viewed as a test-case for tolerance. “We must respect all people and their culture…”

But this test case is about something else. It’s about what happens when the culture and community of a country are torn apart. It’s a test case for globalization. What happens when artificial and forced immigration, in great numbers, brings about chaos?

Globalist planners are pondering: “What amount and quality of revolt among the Swedish people will take place? How easy or difficult will it be to squash such a revolt? How long will it take to achieve the goal of somehow “integrating” a new population, most of whom have no intention of blending into the prevailing culture, some of whom plan to take it apart?”

This is a test case for burying the 9.5 million people of Sweden in a new heterogeneous mixture, in order to see what occurs.

Because, make no mistake about it, it is also the plan for many industrialized technological societies around the world.

This is the perception the Globalists hope to engender: “When we look at Germany, France, Sweden, England, and parts of the US, we no longer see the old homogenous population. Therefore, why call them separate nations? Why should they have borders? Why should they have immigration quotas? There are no immigrants. There are only ‘world citizens.’ Given that fact, they all must be governed as One, from an elevated management platform…”

Globalism, par excellence.

This is why Sweden is a test case.

The Globalist inquiry is: “How deeply programmed with ‘humanitarian goals’ are these Swedish people? How much will they endure silently? To what degree will they refuse to see what is in front of their faces?”

Obviously, we are talking about mind control on a widespread basis.

To come back to the economic picture, we will see major jolts. Household incomes will fall. Taxes will increase. Consumer spending will drop. Therefore, Swedish companies will undergo very hard times.

As I’ve written before, this is where the rubber meets the road in the Globalist plan. If companies and corporations that are supposed to win in the “new civilization” can’t find a sufficient consumer base, disaster will loom.

In this light, there is the strong possibility that Sweden will also become a test case for an even more profound Welfare State. Whether through the invention of a new currency, or by allocation of credit, all persons in Sweden would receive enough buying power to “participate in the economy.”

Elite Globalists: “All right, now we have transformed the population and culture of Sweden. We’re clamping down on citizen revolts. But the consumer base is shrinking. Poverty is spreading. It’s time to make every person a viable consumer. Time to invent money and spread it around.”

Of course, this happened in many countries long ago. But not to this degree, and not by universal dictate.

Such a plan in Sweden would be fraught with the usual crises and disasters. For example: people demanding more buying power; people sending huge amounts of money out of the country; people using money to set up local crime organizations; government debt explodes; there is nothing left of the culture except low-level consumerism; riots against the wealthy increase…

The challenge for Globalists would be to somehow hold it all together and propagandize it as a new social-justice utopia. Free speech, of course, would be banned.

If you want a picture of the new economy, watch the 1982 film, Blade Runner. Forget the plot. Just look at the streets and alleys of the city, the people trudging along in a perpetual drizzle, the zig-zag bazaars and street-booths, the huddled customers, the gray defeated faces, the hints of a broad underground economy.

the matrix revealed

For those who live in Sweden now, and I particularly mean those who are free and independent individuals, it is time for them to assess their future from a position of independence—not as a willing slave of the emerging system.

As countries devolve into lower and lower forms of socialism and forced totalitarianism, it will become clearer to those who can see, going forward, that The Individual is the key.

He is the vanguard. He is the living repository of whatever is good about civilized tradition. He is the lamp in the darkness.

Most importantly, he is the one with imagination and creative force, who, no matter what, can invent new realities that take hold outside the planned mediocrity and destruction.

And in retrospect, he will be recognized as the reason civilization existed in the first place, beyond all other reasons: liberation.

Because after the other liberations are finished, he is the core. He sees life, he has life, he transmits life.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

The plan for the end of Europe: the new USSR

The plan for the end of Europe: the new USSR

by Jon Rappoport

October 21, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“If you controlled the meaning of The Good, and you had unlimited propaganda resources and access to the press, and if you also had control over the Armed Forces and the police, you could build a new society in short order. You could wreck centuries of tradition in a few decades. And if you had the education system in your back pocket, you could wipe out the memory of what formerly existed. No one would remember. No one would care. This is happening now, in Europe. Ignorance is enlightenment.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

One of the basic principles of elite Globalism is: the end of borders, the end of separate nations.

The European Union was built for this purpose, step by step, out of the ashes of World War 2: a super-bureaucracy and political management system for the whole continent.

But that was not enough. There had to be a way to wipe out separate and sovereign nations at ground level, to irrevocably change the landscape.

It is open borders; floods of immigrants; “replacement populations”; an influx of people who have no intention of accepting the customs and way of life in their new homes.

The end result? A de facto reconfiguring of national populations, so that, when you look at the makeup of Europe 20 years from now, you will say:

“Why do we think of Germany or France or England? They don’t really exist. All of Europe is a vast mix of immigrants. Europe is really one country now. So let’s erase all those old artificial borders.”

Eventually, even uttering words like “Swedes, Norwegians, Germans, French, Dutch…” will be considered micro (or macro) aggressions against the “people of Europe.”

Of course, in reaching this point, there will be a certain amount of chaos and violence. The EU is banking on its ability to control it, to put it down where necessary, and to maintain its hold as the one and only governing force in Europe.

On a cultural level, names like Locke, Shakespeare, Goethe, Mozart, Beethoven, Bach, Lorca, Goya, Cezanne, Monet, Van Gogh, Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Dante, Galileo, Faraday, and even “modern” names like Bartok, Stravinsky, Rimbaud, Orwell, and Camus will be vague dusty ghosts that provoke uncomprehending stares. “The past is dead.”

“Oh, but don’t worry about that. The important thing is, every person living in Europe is a citizen of Europe, and is entitled to benefits. This is humane, this is The Good, this is the triumph of the benevolent State. Nothing else matters.”

All European languages will eventually be reduced. Who has the right to speak words that the majority of people can’t understand?

What I’m sketching in here is the grid that will be laid over Europe.

And of course, as automation comes on with a rush, many “citizen-workers of Europe” will become unnecessary. Even great corporations will fall, because they won’t be able to sell their products to an impoverished population. They’ll hope against hope that the billions of people in the East, China and India, will give them new markets.

Against this background, the individual human being will be looked at, from the top, as a cipher, a unit in “models and algorithms.”

The question is, how many individuals will take the bait and regard themselves as mere “parts” in the overall system?

How many will give in and consider their future a function of how much they can obtain from The State, free of charge?

How many will come to believe that their power, as individuals, is inconsequential—or even a delusion?

Why do I bother bringing this up? Because, regardless of the prevailing collectivist mindset—propagandized and promoted and exploited from an elite level—State repression, in all its forms, falls on each individual.

If the very concept of the individual is wiped out, what is left?

In 1859, John Stuart Mill wrote: “If it were felt that the free development of individuality is one of the leading essentials of well-being…there would be no danger that liberty should be undervalued.”

Conversely, when the free development of individuality is of no concern, liberty will die.

Boris Pasternak, the Russian novelist and poet, who knew a thing or two about political repression, wrote (1960): “They [the Soviet bureaucrats] don’t ask much of you. They only want you to hate the things you love and to love the things you despise.”

This reversal is being imposed now, in Europe.

Defectors from the old USSR would recognize it in an instant, having lived through it themselves. The European version seems softer and gentler, but that is just a matter of strategy. The culture is being cooked more slowly.

But just because secret police aren’t knocking on doors in the middle of the night and making mass arrests, that isn’t a sign that individual freedom reigns.

A number of European political leaders are telling their constituencies, “You have no right to oppose the flood of immigration on any grounds. To do so, to utter such public statements, is an offense.”

Does that sound familiar?

The wet dream of every collectivist is coming true. All power at the top; all conformity (called “unity”) everywhere else. The new USSR.

In the old days, the East German police kept records on every citizen and blanketed the population with snitches and spies. The modern Surveillance State has replaced that, searching for “nodes of discontent.”

Collectivists may pay lip service to the dangers of State surveillance, but when it is used to root out people who can’t envision a better world based on, among other features, open borders, well, this is just an enforcement of The Good upon those who can’t discover it for themselves.

If The Humanitarian Way needs a nudge and boost, why not?

For dyed-in-the-wool collectivists, freedom isn’t just a roadblock; it’s an irrelevant illusion. It never existed. All humans are operating according to programs, and have been since birth. Therefore, install a better program, by any means necessary and available. Produce “kinder people.”

This is both a political and a technological imperative.

Open borders and unlimited immigration is a good test case. For people who feel imposed upon, who feel their communities are being torn apart, who feel personally threatened, who feel this is, indeed, a covert operation to transform Europe into a new USSR, there is a need for re-education at the deepest level possible. Because, surely, such people are suffering from profound disorders. Their circuits are crossed. Their brains are defective. They can’t see the larger picture.

They would never be able to see, for example, the wisdom of the words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, David Rockerfeller’s alter ego, who wrote, in 1969:

“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”

Here is the Globalist tactician at work, a man who seems to hate the old USSR, but is seeking to install a version of the same collectivism, through other means.

the matrix revealed

If Lenin were alive today, he would look out over Europe and agree that his agenda is alive and well. He might object to the relatively slow pace. He might want more violence. But he would grudgingly acknowledge that his descendants have discovered a few new tricks.

He would have to approve of the “humanitarian altruism,” and the way it is being modeled and manipulated, so that the edifice of The Good appears as a shining beacon in the darkness.

Nice movie. Excellent production design. Tears of sympathy rolling down the cheeks of the audience.

Minds reduced to one constant: we must care for the less fortunate.

Trillions and trillions of dollars devoted to elicit that sentiment, regardless of the circumstances, or the true malignant outcome, or the actual sinister intent of the elite artists of reality.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

The collapse of Europe

The collapse of Europe

by Jon Rappoport

August 22, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

“For a long time, we’ve lived with the delusion that prosperous nations were going to raise the standard of living of poor nations. That was a piece of infernal propaganda. The objective was always the exploitation of those poverty-stricken nations. Their land, their resources, their labor.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Let’s start with this bit of background:

The fear of individuality comes from the apprehension that a human, unchained and alive, might create something that would expose the titanic hoax of the collective and the group; the apprehension that an individual might create something undeniably great and different; and, therefore, put collective human society in its proper perspective.

And so the individual is called upon to sacrifice himself on the altar of the group.

That is the directive.

The counter-force is the individual using his rational mind, his imagination, and his creative force to surpass this societal brainwashing.

The first step is realizing he is not part of the great collective Cheese Glob.

But most people in so-called “democracies” would not see things this way. They would object. They would claim “the needs of all the people” are not being met. They would claim no one has the right to rise above the standards of the masses.

And “the masses” now refer to wide-open borders in Europe and, as in America, the influx of huge numbers of people fleeing from other parts of the world.

Many of these immigrating people hope for, and expect, economic survival in their new homes. They expect government assistance programs. This is no melting pot. This is a vast extension of the Welfare State, in which the concerns of the individual have no place. No place at all.

Stereotypes are the order of the day. “Which group do you belong to? What race are you? What ethnicity? What are your grievances and demands?”

On the surface, this vast program appears to be humanitarian in nature, but nothing could be further from the truth. Sowing chaos in the nations of Europe is the objective.

Why? Because Globalism, like every elite scheme in the history of the planet, lives by the motto, “Order from Chaos.”

Create chaos, then move in with tighter control, to “solve the problem.”

Wall-to-wall surveillance, militarized police, decimation of free speech.

In this atmosphere, it is very easy for the individual to forget and cast aside his own power and his own unique vision of the future, and his own capacity to invent the future.

It is very easy for the individual to forego rationality and logic as useless objects of a bygone era and simply sink to the level of a stimulus-response creature.

But if that happens, what is left?

Nothing.

During centuries of struggle, Europe carved out a mission of individual freedom, against all odds, and there were eventually many victories.

Now, there is the danger of all that going down the drain.

If the liberation of the individual from the State and the Church is now viewed as a mere fantasy, an old dream, an old lie of history, an old delusion, then the future is turned over to Globalist masters and their program of mass control.

There is a joker in the deck. The European mega-corporations, which are part and parcel of the Globalist network, will discover that their consumer base is shrinking. In short, there will come a point at which these corporations can’t expand by selling their products in the marketplace. Too late, the corporations will realize they are expendable in the diabolical Globalist plan.

One of the winners? The Vatican.

The Roman Church has always realized that their best days are those in which poverty escalates. People then return to older forms of hope and desperation. People then grasp at straws.

Make no mistake, the humanitarian pronouncements of this Pope are a cover story that obscures the Church’s true ambition: flourishing in a time of crisis.

The longer the crisis, the better. The vision of widespread poverty as a permanent condition is the Church’s wet dream. It brings back their glory days.

exit from the matrix

At its core, the entire Globalist operation is aimed at making the individual believe he is helpless.

Whether and to what degree this program succeeds is not in the hands of any group. It is in the hands, the soul of the individual himself.

Which is why my work, for the past decade, has focused more and more on the individual, his power, his life-force, his mind, his imagination, his uniqueness.

The future is up for grabs. Will the wide channel of individual freedom and power, which has been dug for centuries, in a great struggle, be the substance of the future, or will the coming century devolve into one great planetary Collective, mindless and begging for scraps?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Immigration, open US borders: the secret reason

Immigration, open US borders: the secret reason

by Jon Rappoport

December 21, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Here is one, rarely spoken, justification for an open border with Mexico: “Well, we’ve done so many bad things to Mexico in the past, the compensation has to be unlimited immigration.”

If that’s the case, then along with opening the border, the US government would naturally stop doing bad things to Mexico now. Right?

A White House that believes in the past guilt of other administrations would, without question, clean up its own act now.

If not, then the whole pose of apology and humanity is a sham and a scam.

So let’s look at a few present facts.

NAFTA. Obama, during his 2008 Presidential campaign, said he would take another look at that treaty. It needed to be reexamined.

Perhaps he did take a subsequent look, down to the left and far away, as he was flying toward Hawaii on one of his vacations.

NAFTA. From The Guardian, 4 Jan. 2014, “NAFTA: 20 years of regret for Mexico,” by Mark Weisbrot:

“The most basic measure of economic progress, especially for a developing country like Mexico, is the growth of income (or GDP) per person. Out of 20 Latin American countries…Mexico ranks 18, with growth of less than 1% annually since 1994 [when NAFTA went into effect].

“Millions of Mexicans were displaced from farming, for example, after being forced into competition with subsidized and high-productivity agribusiness in the United States, thanks to NAFTA’s rules.”

Truthdig.com, Jan. 9, 2014, “After 20 years, NAFTA leaves Mexico’s economy in ruins,” by Sonali Kolhatkar:

“What in fact happened under NAFTA was that heavily subsidized U.S. corn flooded the Mexican market, putting millions of [Mexican] farmers out of work. Multinational corporations opened up factories creating low-wage [Mexican] jobs at the expense of organized labor and the environment. This, in turn, drove waves of migration north.”

Read that last sentence again.

The truthdig piece extensively quotes Manuel Perez-Rocha, “an associate fellow at the institute for Policy Studies”:

“All these new analyses about how Mexico is becoming a more middle-class society [under NAFTA] and able to buy more products from the United States—it’s just baloney.

“Before NAFTA, I still remember how my father would take me to different industries in which Mexico would manufacture its own tractors and buses. We had an industry that was completely dismantled [by NAFTA] to give way to bigger corporations from the United States to use Mexico as an assembly plant for exporting cars back to the United States. And this hasn’t produced the boom of [Mexican] jobs that was promised. So in the end what NAFTA did was destroy the Mexican national industry and destroy a lot of jobs.

“…the devastation of the Mexican countryside and of the livelihoods of farmers to give way to a narco-economy that has inundated Mexico. This has become very evident in the past few years. [Economic devastation; more unemployed workers and farmers, trying to make a living, join the ‘narco-economy.’]

“…there has been an increase in export-oriented agriculture [from Mexico] that relies on fossil fuels, chemicals, genetically modified organisms, and the excessive use of water. There has also been an expansion of environmentally destructive mining activities in Mexico. There’s been more mining in the last 10 years than in the whole colonial period. There have been higher levels of air and water pollution as associated with the growth of the maquiladora factories [relocated US manufacturing operations in a NAFTA ‘free-trade’ Mexican zone]. And there has been a progressive weakening of domestic environmental safeguards and expanded powers to [relocated US] corporations to challenge environmental policies.”

Kolhatkar concludes his devastating article with a statement that leaves no doubt about Obama’s current intentions, vis-à-vis changing the US stance toward Mexico:

“Today, the Obama administration, which did not even acknowledge the 20th anniversary of NAFTA, is eyeing a new, grander trade deal in the image of NAFTA called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The TPP is a secret deal being negotiated by the Obama administration directly with various nations. Activists have called it ‘NAFTA on Steroids.’ Obama is seeking ‘fast-track authority’ on the deal, whereby elected [US Congressional] representatives would be allowed to vote on only the entire agreement without being party to negotiations over the details. WikiLeaks recently published a leaked draft chapter of the agreement that has confirmed some of the worst suspicions of activists opposing it. One expert called it ‘A Christmas wish list for major corporations.’”

In other words, the idea that open borders are a humane response to, and an apology for, past US transgressions against Mexico is utter and complete fabrication.

Obama, and whoever his successor is, aim to wage economic war against Mexico at a new and higher level.

One of the results, as mentioned above? This will force new waves of immigrants in Mexico to come north, to the US.

Do you see this issue more clearly now? Increased immigration northward was always an expected outcome of NAFTA. And so it will be under the TPP.

This is a succession of Presidents—Clinton, Bush, Obama—pushing for immigration as if were an act of kindness (“give us your huddled masses”), when it was a cold calculated safety-valve solution to enable big US corporations to do business in Mexico and make their profits soar, as they put huge numbers of Mexican workers out in the cold.

The elite strategy? “Don’t leave all those angry unemployed workers at the doors of US corporations in Mexico. Who knows what they might do? Let them come to the US for a better life. We’ll prepare the US population to accept them…”

Of course, as US corporations shuttered their doors in America and moved south to Mexico, US unemployment soared, and so did the US trade deficit.

Cover stories were needed to obscure the naked truth. The 2007-08 economic collapse in the US was used for that purpose.

More directly, the Obama administration simply lied about facts and figures. For example, as Public Citizen has pointed out:

“By counting products made offshore as ‘U.S. exports,’ this scam would hide the devastation of U.S. manufacturing…U.S. firms like Apple that have offshored their production jobs would be reclassified as ‘factoryless goods’ manufacturers. An iPhone made in China and sold in Europe would somehow perversely count as a U.S. manufactured export. This would deceptively deflate the reported U.S. manufacturing trade deficit—and artificially inflate the number of U.S. manufacturing jobs. Apple’s brand managers and programmers would suddenly be counted as ‘manufacturing’ workers!”

power outside the matrix

And that’s where we are. That’s a central thread of the story behind immigration and open borders. And that, to a significant degree, is the history of the Obama Presidency; a giant scam perpetrated on the American people, causing much, much suffering.

When Obama first took office in 2008, several of his closest advisors expected that his first shot out of the gate would be: creating jobs amid massive American unemployment.

They were shocked when, against their advice, he went for national health insurance.

What they failed to realize was their President had a mission that superseded jobs and employment. He was tasked with protecting the mega-corporations who were benefiting from the free-trade treaties, like NAFTA.

He willingly, and with full knowledge, accepted that covert role.

Massive unemployment in the US? Grotesque consequences for the people of Mexico? Not a problem.

Obama is another in a line of Globalist Presidents. That’s what he was in 2008, and that’s what he is now.

Perhaps some of the people who couldn’t believe the facts I presented over a year ago, when I called Obama Monsanto’s man in Washington, will now begin to understand what is going on.

Monsanto is one more mega-corporation the President is pledged to protect.

Romney? Jeb Bush? Hillary? Elizabeth Warren? They have saluted, and will continue to salute Globalism and free trade and economic devastation, in whatever jobs they may hold, as of 2016.

Those who keep sucking at the left-right political teat, arguing progressive vs. conservative, and elevating their favorite “heroes,” are missing the bigger picture by miles.

They keep congratulating themselves on their ideology, while those heroes of theirs—front men and women for elite crime bosses—bathe in the stench of the Globalist Syndicate.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.