New Podcast: The Real President

I’m taking off the gloves

by Jon Rappoport

June 28, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

ACTION! DRAMA! AN END TO THE PILE OF GARBAGE CALLED THE CORPORATE STATE! NO MORE CULTURE PRESIDED OVER BY WHINING VICTIMS!

This podcast is very different. Those of you who haven’t subscribed, throw in a few bucks and listen.

Ever since I ran for a seat in the US Congress in 1994, I’ve been making notes on the portrait of a REAL President of the United States. A man who would actually go to the wall for values and freedoms expressed in the Founding documents of this country.

And when I say “go to the wall,” I mean something far more than ANYTHING we’ve ever seen from a modern President.

For example, he would have to dismantle and crush whole sectors of the bloated federal apparatus that has been erected over the past 200-plus years. So he would have to be a very different KIND of man.

Perhaps a Teddy Roosevelt or an Andrew Jackson, minus a few of their insane character flaws.

This is my intent: paint a picture in words of a real President and describe exactly what he would do. In detail. BLOW FRESH CLEAN AIR INTO A LUNATIC CULTURE.

Why? Because we need, more than ever now, a new standard.

We need a new VISION. Because too many people believe we can never put things right; that too much power and too much corruption has invaded every sphere of human life. We need to offload that conception and burn it to the ground.

We CAN’T just settle, in our minds and hearts, for baby steps along a road that might liberate us a little more or preserve a status quo that is moderately comfortable for some and say this is the best we can hope for.

Trust me, I fully understand what we’re up against. I also understand that most people believe a REAL leader would be blocked, trapped, cut off, hamstrung, and weighed down in diabolical legal clap-trap until he is effectively castrated.

But you see, and I really hope you get this because it’s crucial, “what most sensible people believe” is exactly what keeps us from forming a vision of what we actually WANT. AND THAT VISION IS AN ESSENTIAL BEGINNING, without which everyone flounders and finally surrenders.

FIRST comes the big vision. Then comes the plan for implementing it. If you try to put the plan and the system first, you fail every time.

There are endless reasons under the sun for believing all is lost. There are endless reasons for being cynical to the point of running out of energy.

So what I’m doing in this podcast is reclaiming lost territory and lost energy and lost pictures of what I believe we really want to see happening in this country, from top to bottom…embodied in the vision of a real leader.

THROWING CAUTION TO WINDS in the process.

Because SOMEBODY has to.

Somebody has to, without being circumspect, without thinking a real revolution is “scientific,” without sounding like a tech head from Microsoft giving a TED talk.

A REAL President would attack. He would attack the enormous landfills of bullshit that have surrounded us.

Well, what would that attack look like, from Day One of his Presidency?

What would he do, in full possession of his senses, with a burning clarity of mind, to turn upside-down things right-side up?

How would he act, and what would he say—avoiding all the tightly measured and sphincter-clenched drivel of politicians?

What would he say if he was actually committed to MAKE A REVOLUTION HAPPEN?

How would he embark to irritate every oyster shell in which every comfortable person lives—forcing that shell to produce a pearl?

Oh yes—some people will immediately say that such a man would turn into a military dictator. But I say no. I’m showing a man who would elevate freedom-with-responsibility to heights that would impact the lowest worm of a defeatist cynic to his core.

This is the picture of a man I’m painting. A picture whose existence has long been forgotten.

THE REAL PRESIDENT.

The one millions of people have unconsciously been waiting for.

Not “a chosen one.” Not some automatic one from nowhere presented to the people on a silver platter. But a man who has worked his way up to the place where seeing and taking action are One.

It’s time to look at this man.

In the podcast, I’ll do my damnedest to show him to you. In a way that stops you dead in your tracks if you just want to shrug and say, SO WHAT? I’ll try to show him to you in a way that involves you in his great enterprise and war, because it’s your war, too.

It’s yours, mine, and everybody else’s’; this goddamn war has been going on for 50,000 years.

But here’s the bottom line on the podcast. You can look at this vision of a real president from any distance. Up close, far away. You can walk around him, view him from the side in profile. You can engage at different levels. You can experience your own feelings and thoughts as you watch him make his revolution. You can find out more about what you REALLY feel. That’s my goal in this podcast.

Listen.

— Jon Rappoport


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


To read Jon’s articles on Substack, click here.


The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Quiet apocalypse at the school board: when in the course of human events…

by Jon Rappoport

June 20, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

In OhMyGod, Ohio, on a slow Thursday afternoon, Dr. Helmet Von Suit, a career bureaucrat, the president of the school board, held a meeting to discuss budget allocations for the coming year. Sixty parents sat in the room.

Margo Smith stood up and said:

I have two young boys in elementary school. One of them brought me a book from the library which contains pictures and descriptions of oral sex and other sexual practices. I’m going to read a graphic passage from the book now—

That won’t be possible. To read it would be obscene, and we can’t have that at a public meeting.

Dr. Suit, as I said, this is a book from—

I don’t care where it’s from. I refuse to allow—

All right. I’ve copied pages from the book and sent them to a hundred parents in the District. I’m sure you’ll be hearing from them. Now, as to the matter of Critical Race Theory, I have a video taken in a sixth grade class two weeks ago. The teacher is telling nine-year olds that all white people are evil racists, and that would include children. I’ll play you the audio.

No you won’t. What goes on in our classrooms is private and privileged. Recording video is a crime.

I see. It’s all right for a teacher to tell nine-year olds that all white people are racists, but it’s not all right for anyone to document the teacher saying that. Good, Dr. Suit. We now have you on the record. So I’ll move on. Four teachers in the District are teaching very young children they can choose their gender. Not only that—and we have audio and video—but the teachers are telling the kids they can take puberty blocking drugs that will help them make a choice about gender. In this folder, I have eight published studies describing the VERY serious adverse effects of the drugs. I want to read a passage from one of the studies.

Out of order. We don’t permit casual reading of scientific literature. Our District public health people make all medical decisions—

Then I’ll say this. I have another folder here with studies documenting the ineffectiveness of masks, and the negative consequences of children wearing them. On top of that, I have 40 studies—

Not permitted—

—That conclude the COVID vaccines are unnecessary for children and carry considerable risks.

You don’t get to decide that.

Oh but I do. A month ago, I started a Zoom group of school parents in the District. We now have 85 parents attending our sessions. The number expands every week. You can either hold real discussions with us or you can suffer the consequences.

That sounds like a threat. It borders on terrorism.

We’re aware the US Attorney General has tasked the FBI with investigating parents like us, all across the country, who are rising up in rebellion against oppressive school boards. We don’t care. We’re willing to deal with whatever comes our way.

Even if it means being thrown in jail?

Especially if it means that. We want the vaccine mandate eradicated. We’re not sending our kids to school if they have to take the shot. We’ll pull our kids out. Actually, we’re in the process of starting our own home school. Free from people like you.

What do mean, people like me?

Bureaucrats who pick up a paycheck on our tax dime and harm our children. By the way, we know your teachers aren’t teaching our children how to read and write. Certainly not at their grade levels. Your teachers are faking grades to make it seem education is going on in the classrooms.

This is outrageous.

I agree. And we’ve had enough. This is a 1776 moment, Doctor.

Another threat of insurrection.

You bet. That’s exactly what it is. Without guns. Without a shot being fired. You’re a bureaucrat who does evil, who passes along evil, who permits evil. You think we serve you, but we don’t. You’re OURS.

I won’t stand for this.

You’ll stand for it or sit for it. Our numbers are growing every day. We won’t back down. No matter what.

Trump is behind all this!

Who? Oh, you mean the former President who keeps flogging his wondrous COVID vaccine that’s caused, by a VERY conservative estimate, more than 800,000 injuries in America? But listen, keep trying to sell that line. Sell anything you want to.

Who are you anyway? Who’s behind you? Who’s funding you? Everything you’re saying is just code for white racism.

Keep telling yourself that, as more and more black parents join our group.

We have hundreds of thousands of people on social media who will drown you out.

Do you seriously think we care about those bobble heads? We’re parents. PARENTS. We would do anything for our children. You’re fronting for an agenda of destruction. We see that clearly. You want to control our kids’ minds. We want to make them free and strong and independent. Those are the terms of the war. Now, seriously, who do you think is on the side of the angels?

Don’t give me that garbage. Children live under the protection of the State. They’re part of the State.

Glad to get that on the record, too, DOCTOR.

You don’t have final say over your children. We can intercede.

You’ve been interceding for a long time. We were asleep. Not anymore.

We’re a duly instituted public school board. You have no license to change what we do.

We’re raising our children. That’s duly instituted on levels you’re apparently unaware of.

The school system and the government behind it are stronger than you are.

We’ll see about that. Ever hear of the phrase, “consent of the governed?”

That consent was given to us a long time ago.

We’re in the process of taking it back. You’re a figurehead, Dr. Suit. As classrooms in your schools empty out, and more and more parents put their kids into home schooling, you’ll see that. When our Union of Concerned Parents starts picketing your—

Union of what?!

Did I forget to mention that? We’re forming a Union of the Dissenters.

You have no power to do that.

Of course we do. That’s what our lawyers tell us.

Your lawyers?

Yes. It turns out that some parents are also practicing attorneys.

Don’t get sarcastic with me.

This is just the beginning of your nightmare. We’re going to squeeze you in every possible way. We no longer recognize your authority. Nor do we accept your judgments.

I’ll have you thrown in jail.

You already said that. We’re ready. We have six local police officers in our parent group. If we’re arrested, they’ll be making video statements which, by the way, will mention you by name. Those videos will be spread all over the world.

That’s illegal.

By what law? Has the 1st Amendment been recently revoked? And how do you think jailing dozens of parents is going to play? Talk to your PR people. Ask them.

You pay us to babysit your children.

Thank you again, Doctor. Another nice statement for the record. Actually, no. We pay you to teach our children to think for themselves, to use their imaginations. To learn the basics. You’re failing on all counts.

I’m warning you.

Warning us about what?

You’ve gone too far.

We’re just getting started. Our theater group—

Your what?

—Will be putting on little sketches all over town. You’re the featured character. Doctor Suit Enforces Mask Mandates on Our Children, But He Doesn’t Wear a Mask in Public. That’s the first one. We’ll be reading passages describing raw sex acts from the book in the school library. That should provoke some interesting reactions. You know—“Here’s how your tax dollars are being spent.”

Sit down.

I am sitting down, Doctor. I’ve been sitting down for a few minutes. You’re the one standing up.

You’re a devil.

I refer you to the members of my church. I’m the head of the choir. On the other hand, your provenance is questionable.

You’re a…Republican.

My status is Independent. I cast my votes in elections on a case by case basis. You…not so much. We have your record during your term as city councilman. We know who donated to your campaign. For example, that “financier for the people,” who lobbied against the bill that would have ordered a clean-up of the lead and other heavy metals in the drinking water.

I’m calling the police now.

We already have, Doctor. We’ve informed them this is a legal and peaceful meeting, and we’re happy to answer any questions they may have. You see, Doctor, we’re prepared. We’re not bumpkins. We try to think things through and anticipate. We want to provide a workable template for other parent groups, so they can do the same. Of course, we’re outraged at what you’ve been doing to our children. But that doesn’t mean we’re flying by the seat of our pants. By the way, we have a request. Your brother-in-law owns a piece of empty land on the edge of the city. Some of our parents who live out there want to turn it into an urban farm. People in the community would grow food for themselves and sell the excess to local markets. We’d like you to help us get permission.

I can’t do that.

Why not?

There is an ongoing negotiation with the city to—

Turn it into a landfill for garbage. Yes, we’re aware. But which would you rather see? People living next door to a toxic dump, or those people growing clean, nutritious, free food for themselves and their families?

This is a PR stunt.

Since when is food a stunt?

I refuse to knuckle under to pressure.

Because you’re bent on control. In your mind, giving people an inch is letting them take a mile. You need basic re-education.

You’re lecturing me about education?

Your PhD is in social psychology. Aside from teaching one semester of plane geometry and algebra in a private junior high school, you’ve never dealt with students face to face. After the school let you go, you flew out to California and convinced a rich friend from college to cut you in on a winery he was launching. You’ve been serving as an administrative assistant in that operation for many years. As far as we can tell, your job involves studying in-house reports and liaising with a law firm. Recently, you spoke with your friend about bankrolling your run for mayor of our city. You have your eye on that office, as a stepping-stone to the governorship. We don’t think that’s going to happen for you. We think you’re dead in the water, Doctor.

You’re…you’re…

I’m what, Doctor? My name is Margo Smith, and I have two young children in public school in your District. Today, I pulled them out of school. They’re never going back. The perverse show you and your board members are running, which you call education, is a blight. It’s a disgrace and a crime. You’re a grifter with a degree next to your name, that’s all.

You’re making this personal. You’re digging into my private life. That’s out of bounds. It’s illegal.

Really? If you’re going to throw your hat in the political arena, Doctor, you’d better get used to it. It’s called opposition research. I’m trying to prepare you. You should be thanking me. For instance, remember the cute beagle your family used to have? Sonny? For some reason, you gave Sonny away. But not to another family. Not even to a shelter. You donated him to your old friend, Jim Murdock. Jim owns an animal testing lab. Sonny went into a cage. To test an experimental antibiotic, lab techs cut away pieces of Sonny’s body, leaving open wounds, to study “infection rate and treatment.” The experimental drug, used for bacterial infections, was redundant. There were a dozen antibiotics just like it on the market.

I never knew about that until it was too late!

We don’t think that’s true. We’ve been talking to Jim Murdock.

That son of a bitch!

A few years ago, you gave him advice about a biotech stock. You told him you had inside information. He bought shares, and it tanked. He wasn’t very happy about that. —I see the police are arriving. A bunch of us are leaving now, Doctor, to chat with them. Carry on. Discuss how you’re going to spend our tax dollars. We’ll see you around. Soon and often. We’ll pass along your regards to your ex-wife. A few of us are having tea with her later this afternoon. Should be an interesting conversation.


Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)


To read Jon’s articles on Substack, click here.


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

What about the good fathers?

by Jon Rappoport

June 6, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

A couple of months ago, I started to write a piece about all the celebration-and-recognition days, weeks, and months in America. Proud of this, hurray for that. Participation trophies for civic workers who are left-handed, and are missing a toe.

I gave up after an hour. There are too many of these Special Days. Far too many for any country that wants to call itself sane. I also stopped thinking about all the people who plan and stage the events; the ridiculous amount of time spent, the goofy work put in; the wall to wall mindless self-congratulation.

I did notice there was no Day set aside for fathers—I mean fathers who work hard and earn a living for their families and help raise their children and set an example. Don’t talk to me about the traditional once a year Father’s Day. It’s empty. Vapid.

I think there should be a whole month. FATHERS WHO EARN A LIVING FOR THEIR FAMILIES. Because it isn’t easy.

If men who gather together in the woods and beat drums and talk about their feelings rate books being written about them, then a Recognition Month for fathers who support their families should spawn its own stories about dedication, commitment, and hard work.

And if some synthetic group pushing who knows what can go to the White House and smile and shake hands with the President and pose for pictures, why can’t the good fathers earn an invitation and grab press coverage?

Because it would drive people crazy. That’s why. People who don’t know, and don’t want to know, what steady every day work is like would take to Twitter whining about the “crime” of exalting fathers and “desecrating society’s victims.”

I was probably moved to write this article an hour ago, when I read about a new documentary detailing the Canadian truckers’ journey across the country to protest Trudeau’s vaccine policy. And I realized that, in all the coverage of the convoy at the time, no one seemed to be mentioning the fact that these truckers actually work for a living, relentlessly doing something hard every day. They aren’t college students living off of loans, attending classes in which the professors instruct them on the latest woke causes.

The Good Fathers. We’re supposed to believe it’s an idea whose time came and went. We’re on the cusp of a New Age; robot machines are taking over from human hands and brains.

Therefore, we’ll all gain automatic status as citizens provided for by the State. And as the World Economic Forum proclaims, we’ll own nothing and we’ll be happy.

There’s the rub. Fathers who support their families actually own something. Something worth preserving; and when push comes to shove, something worth defending.

My God, we can’t celebrate THAT. Oh no. It would be counter-productive. Of course, the word “productive” itself has been redefined. It now means a free lunch.

Why? Because a free lunch is the precursor to free everything, and the small print on that government contract contains a clause which reads: “We give you survival, if and only if you behave.”

THE GOOD FATHERS AREN’T SIGNING THE CONTRACT.

In my dreams, I hear a mellifluous play by play man say exactly that on global television, with a thousand good fathers standing at the 50-yard line during the half-time show at the Super Bowl.

No music. No bands. Just 80,000 fans in the stands cheering.

Then we would really have something.

Then the shit would hit the fan and fly off into outer space.

And we would have even more.


Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)


To read Jon’s articles on Substack, click here.


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Home schooling: here’s what our masters say

And you’d better pay attention

by Jon Rappoport

May 23, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

Daniel Greenfield, writing at Front Page Magazine, offers this gem:

“Elizabeth Bartholet, the director of Harvard Law’s Child Advocacy Program, described the ‘homeschooling phenomenon’ as a ‘threat’ to society, claiming that conservative parents ‘homeschool because they want to isolate their children from ideas and values central to our democracy’, ‘promote racial segregation and female subservience’, and ‘question science’.”

“Her paper called for a ‘presumptive ban on homeschooling, with the burden on parents to demonstrate justification for permission to homeschool.’ These views are not fringe.”

Of course, this elite Harvard titan, Bartholet, knows which ideas and values are central to our democracy; and the place to drill them into children’s heads is public school.

Which pretty much sums up what public schools are for.

She also has a complete grasp of science in all fields, and she can identify disruptive questions which would lead unsuspecting people down the wrong track.

Appoint her the head of Something Big immediately.

Like all of her super-educated colleagues, she manages to forget that the United States is a Republic, not a democracy. But a democracy is what she needs, because under that system the well-oiled systems of money determine which voices are heard and which are silenced.

The voices that are heard are called “the will of The People.” So says the press, which is basically a PR and marketing operation on behalf of Money. As a cover, the press pretends to be an advocate for the poor and the underserved.

Elizabeth Bartholet should be pumping gas and collecting tumbleweed at a station in Death Valley, where she can talk to herself and right all the wrongs of society.

It’s always this way with elites; they know what we need because we can’t know it. They labor to supply us with their values because ours are worthless.

Their bottom line, when it comes to education? Children don’t belong to their parents. They belong to the State. So you see, their territory of operation is far wider than schools. They’re werewolves, and parents are silver bullets.

In 2020, Bartholet was a co-organizer of a Harvard summit on homeschooling, along with law professor James Dwyer. The announcement for this summit included the following profile of Dwyer. Buckle up:

“James Dwyer, a law professor at the College of William and Mary. He is the professor famous for claiming that ‘The reason parent-child relationships exist is because the State confers legal parenthood …’ In his 1994 law review article ‘Parents’ Religion and Children’s Welfare: Debunking the Doctrine of Parents’ Rights’ (82 Calif. L. Rev. 1371), Dwyer argued that ‘the claim that parents should have child-rearing rights—rather than simply being permitted to perform parental duties and to make certain decisions on a child’s behalf in accordance with the child’s rights—is inconsistent with principles deeply embedded in our law and morality’.”

Yes. Democracy. Certainly.

Isn’t this what you’ve always wanted? Permission from the State to perform certain limited parental duties?

Dwyer’s deep understanding of the Constitution is evident here. He realizes that, contrary to popular belief, the founding document never intended to limit and constrain central government and guarantee wide freedom to the individual.

No. Instead, it embedded government EVERYWHERE, especially within the family. Parents, the Founders reasoned, were no better than British Kings. They had to be hamstrung and placed in homes as carefully watched and monitored agents of the State, to carry out instructions on how to raise children.

Aha. Yes. Of course. How could we have missed that?

And it’s only fitting that we should receive such wisdom from Harvard, where posing as guardians of the disenfranchised while sitting on a pile of endowment money that reaches to the moon has been raised to an art form.

At Harvard, the elites play in the fields of the Lord and stoop to offer us mandates about the basics of life itself.

Mother? Father? Son? Daughter? These are grave misnomers which arose owing to parental ignorance and overreach.

A vast course correction is needed, and our rulers will define the law and guide the way.

Bow the head, bend the knee, and give thanks.

Or you could build a moat around your home and fill it with crocodiles. While you home school your children.

You know, mothers—the children YOU GAVE BIRTH TO.

Unless you believe sex, conception, pregnancy, and birth are mere footnotes of State law.

Decreed by Harvard.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Associated Press, sign up for my 1st Amendment seminar, you idiots

by Jon Rappoport

May 13, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

This is a one-time offer to the Associated Press. My weekend seminar on free speech and the meaning of the 1st Amendment can be yours, for the low, low price of $10000000000000000000000000. Cash up front.

In a recent piece about Elon Musk, AP offers this stunner:

“Musk boasts that he’s acquiring Twitter to defend freedom of speech. But he has long used the platform to attack perceived foes who dare to disagree with him.”

Let’s see. If Musk really believed in free speech, he would refrain from responding to his critics, right? That’s what FREE and SPEECH mean, right?

Or Musk would write, “I differ from you in my assertions, but thanks for responding. Everything is relative.”

If Musk really believed in free speech, he would send each of his critics a check for $10,000, to prove how tolerant he is.

Musk: “Dear GruffDog2: I acknowledge your disagreement with my recent statement about space travel. If you sign an affidavit swearing that you’re a member of an underserved community, I’ll increase my check to $15,000.”

If Musk really believed in free speech, he would never ever attack (in print) someone who disagreed with him. Because THAT would be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment. This is what AP is declaring.

Perhaps this is what AP is saying: “Hey, man, this dude Musk is the richest dude in the world. So the whole thing is unfair. The deck is stacked against the poor victim who disagreed with him. See, when Musk tweets, the page automatically lights up and glows, but when the little victim dude tweets, the page is dark.”

I’ve reached out to AP with this interpretation, but their office of self-justification hasn’t gotten back to me.

However, some unknown person at AP did send me this: I dug up a 1795 statement penned by James Madison: “Our work launching a new nation means nothing unless we realize that FREE SPEECH really focuses on the comment a person makes when he disagrees with a prior person’s statement. If the prior person THEN disagrees with the first disagreement, he is taking things too far. His speech is not protected. He can be stripped of all his assets and sent to prison for the rest of his life. Or he can be shot at dawn.”

I relayed that response to the offices of Joe Biden and Barack Obama. Biden immediately returned a terse remark: “I approve of this message. Vote for me.”

Obama stated: “The 1st Amendment doesn’t cover misinformation. No one has the right to misinform. The Constitution is a living document, and I continue to interpret it for you. My cronies and I define misinformation in our weekly updates. No one has the right to be wrong. The world is too dangerous a place to permit wrongness. For example, the NSA informs me you’ve written a piece mocking my family for living in our beachfront mansion on Martha’s Vineyard, since we affirm the imminent threat of climate change and drowning of all coastlines. However, you’re wrong; because I say so. I hereby fine you $1000000000. My people will be in touch to provide you with account and routing numbers.”


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Why I’ve been writing about Yellowstone at substack

Why millions of people are watching Yellowstone

by Jon Rappoport

May 12, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

15 million people watched Episode 1 of Season 4 of Paramount’s smash-hit cable series, Yellowstone.

This is populism television—a tidal wave out of nowhere.

There are several factors involved. The main one is:

A family is determined to keep its land—the biggest ranch in Montana—against all odds. Against all attempts to take the land by: the state government, a gigantic corporate land developer, an Indian tribe, a psychopathic killer and his hired guns.

The ranching Dutton family will go to any lengths to keep the land.

This suddenly resonates with millions of viewers.

No other television series in history, based on the premise of holding on to private property, has provoked such passion.

What’s going on?

Americans have come to a crossroad and they know it.

The government and its allies want to gobble up private property and end it. This is the inevitable outcome of the Parent State in action. This is also Globalism in action. This is, yes, one of the pillars of Socialism, Communism, and Marxist philosophy—the outlawing of all private property.

The tactics for achieving this goal are many. Outright seizure, crippling property taxes, a welter of regulations making private ownership far more risky and difficult.

Yellowstone pulls no punches. No episode goes by without the producers shoving the issue of private ownership in the faces of viewers.

And viewers respond. They see who the good guys and the bad guys are.

Of course, reviews in the press don’t hammer on this issue of private property incursion and destruction. They acknowledge the popularity of the series, but they don’t try to explain it. Well, they wouldn’t. Because the issue is too hot to handle. Much too hot.

At the end of Season 4, rancher-daughter Beth Dutton schools an idealistic environmentalist on the biggest threat to the Montana environment: the corporate developer, Market Equities, who intends to build a new ugly modern consumerist city for rich tourists on the beautiful landscape—an airport, highways, hotels, casinos, condo complexes, ski resorts, etc.

Market Equities’ notion of private property has no connection to basic family ownership of land. It’s impersonal. It’s a factory operation. It’s a partnership with the state government, a job creator, a tax collector. It’s a non-stop bulldozer. It’s Vegas, brutally injected into eternal hills and valleys.

And along with this “modernization,” Yellowstone also puts front and center the rise of the “modern citizen,” shallow, perky, politically correct, clueless, petty, nasty under the surface, completely cut off from the land and its moral values and traditions. Beth Dutton is the relentless exposer and slayer of this new citizen.

If ever a fictional television series could cross over into real life and spawn a greater resistance to foul, elite, giant destruction of private-ownership, Yellowstone is it.

I can only hope the upcoming Season 5 doesn’t back down an inch from the previous 4.

There’s another thing Yellowstone is doing. It’s highlighting a stark competition and war been one side and another, played out on the land of Montana. Yes, COMPETITION, yet another traditional American value that has been attacked, downplayed, befouled, and accused of being inherently UNFAIR.

Hence, trophies for children who merely participate in sports. “Here, Jimmy, you tried to kick the ball four times last season and missed three times, so accept this plastic statue and know we all love you, and don’t ever bother thinking about who the best athletes on the team are. There is no best.”

Sports put the lie to that. Sports, which more and more people are taught to hate, endure. They’re stark. They’re real. They’re built to decide who wins. The nightly news doesn’t turn sports into a mush of indeterminate he said he said. The scoreboard doesn’t turn 101-87 into a tie.

Even with all the corruption surrounding and infecting sports, they survive. On the field. Where it counts.

Kids learn to deal with it. They find out they can get better if they work harder. There is a ladder of attainment, and they can climb it. Or they can try to fake it and fail. Excuses don’t succeed. Complaining doesn’t succeed.

Parents can console their children after a loss, but if they try to rip the heart out of a sport in order to “save their kids,” the whole proposition backfires. Weakness takes over.

The world can’t be made fair by trying to strip away talent and effort and the desire to achieve and the commitment to work. The world can’t be made fair by trying to submerge these basics. It can only be made into an idiot’s circus and a government overseer-bureau and a peer-pressure reduction of language and a massive toleration of stupidity.

In a society where the Glob and the Group and the Know-Nothing and the Pussified and the Obedient Little Fascist are promoted as The Good, the ultimate resistance comes from The Individual.

That’s what I’m speaking of and writing to.


FURTHER READING:

The bottom lines of Yellowstone

In vitro: “(of a process) performed or taking place in a test tube, culture dish, or elsewhere outside a living organism.”

~

Rebuilding civilization in the wake of losing this one

Kurt Schwab watches Yellowstone

~

Tom Brady and Yellowstone: the answer

~

Yellowstone, DeSantis, and the land


Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

I don’t want half a revolution

Advice to reporters and others

by Jon Rappoport

May 5, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

“I’m not anti-vaccine. I just want them to be safer and more effective.”

I love that statement. It’s a lullaby. When I can’t go to sleep at night, I just repeat it to myself a few times, and I’m out cold.

It’s typical of half a revolution, which never wins.

For the past 32 years, I’ve presented overwhelming evidence that no vaccine was ever safe or effective. The whole “science” of vaccination is a rank fraud.

But stuffed-shirt journalists, who sort of go against the grain while maintaining a front of respectability, don’t want to venture that far. They know the price they’ll have to pay. They’re hedging their bets.

Occasionally, one of them will take a swipe at me. It cements their position as middle of the road. Which is where they want to be.

Except, liberty and freedom, which is what we’re fighting for, against a global coup by mass medical murders, isn’t something you win in the middle of the road.

You don’t win by trying to come off like a Washington Post reporter who just happens to have different and dissenting ideas. That’s what half-ass looks like.

That sort of person is basically saying, “I have a machine mind like other machine minds. The difference is, I’m inputting different data and therefore drawing different conclusions. If you, too, have a machine mind, read what I write and let’s establish truth and justice…”

The long-term effect of that is like pissing through a fire hose to put out a conflagration taking down a city.

This is simple. If one group of “superior” machine minds wins against another group of machine minds—regardless of which issues come out on top—there is no revolution. LIFE AND FREEDOM have been excised out of the equation.

A considerable amount of money and effort have gone into building a modern culture composed of what looks like science and rationality, but isn’t. It’s a cartoon. A fucking cartoon.

There’s no JUICE in it.

That’s why I use the phrase machine-minds. Minds that calculate and process and collate and compare and then exude “better answers.” This is your educated class. Careful, cautious. Circumspect.

“Delivery, sir. Here are flowers you ordered. I’m sorry they’re dead.”

“I don’t mind dead. But I ordered roses and you brought me tulips. I can prove it. Let me just find the receipt here on my cell phone. And then I can show you these withered blossoms are actually tulips. There are 32 differences between the two types of flowers…”

That’s your educated class.

See, I’ve been at this for 38 years. Reporting. Writing. Actually, I’ve been writing for 66 years. I’ve made the cases I wanted to make. I’ve shoved the evidence in people’s faces. The overall medical cartel is waging a VERY successful war against the people.

You have to turn that evidence with torque, with leverage, into a flamethrower. You’re not just trying to set the record straight and bring in truth, you’re using the truth to crash the gold-plated systems of machine minds.

Those minds are remote. Distant. Distant is where Big Tech domeheads operate from. They profile, they plan, they crunch trillions of pieces of data, and they develop strategies to build a civilization that looks like their minds and their computers.

When one of these high-IQ blown dry characters develops his version of a conscience, and turns whistleblower, he’s a hero to his ilk. He speaks their language. He thinks the way they do. He geeks like they geek.

If I have to guess which guy has more freedom in his belly and his brain, I’m going with the man who lives up in the hills of Tennessee with a shotgun and a dog. If he doesn’t like what I’m writing, I might think about his reasons for a half-hour. Whereas, when an “alt. journalist” claims I’m “going too far,” I know exactly what his game is. He’s spraying his usual brand of sanitizing respectable room-deodorant.

I’ll put this another way. Two men are discussing how to choose a wife. They’re looking at two different lists of characteristics a man should consider and check. But neither man mentions LOVE, so it doesn’t matter which list they decide is superior. They don’t know what love is. What they’re really discussing are machine-thoughts.

If the COVID narrative had never been launched, if we were living now as we did in 2018, we would still have a medical cartel taking away our freedom and killing and maiming an extraordinary number of people. And that will still be the case, even if all COVID mandates and restrictions are defeated.

Plus, the Brave New World on the drawing boards is fronted by medical people. Three of its main features are genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and human-computer interfaces and hybrids. If you think all possible freedom is now under fire, you haven’t seen anything yet.

Way back when, I was briefly trained in two schools. The first was formal logic, taught by a beloved college professor with an extraordinarily sophisticated mind and a huge heart. The second school consisted of two or three encounters with Ida Honorof, activist and author. She was barely five feet tall, and she had the energy, in her 70s, of ten tigers. She explained to me one afternoon, on a street corner, that officials in Los Angeles were spraying a version of deadly Agent Orange in the Angeles National Forest. She handed me a few pounds of corporate and government documents detailing the massive toxicity of a variety of pesticides. She kick-started my life as a reporter.

Neither one of these people engaged in coddling. They didn’t sit around planning their fronts and poses of respectability. They didn’t want half a revolution. They didn’t equivocate.

I’ve never been a big fan of equivocation. I’m over at the I-don’t-give-a-shit end of the spectrum.

Find answers—then shove in all your chips. At the end of the night, don’t leave anything on the table.

Fortunately for all of us, there is a life after this one. But we’re here now, so we’re fighting.

Make it COUNT.

In the wind and the rain and the storm, issue no apologies.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Pray for drone wars over the southern border

by Jon Rappoport

April 22, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

Yes, Virginia, Mexican drug cartels are flying drones over the US southern border.

San Diego Union Tribune: “Cartels have not given up on drones at the U.S.-Mexico border, despite the small aircraft’s inefficiency in smuggling meaningful amounts of drugs.”

“In a recent 13-month period, Border Patrol agents reported 21 drone incursions along the San Diego County boundary with Mexico, according to the agency. The unmanned aircraft were carrying drugs in at least six of the incidents — either methamphetamine or cocaine.”

Yes, but this story looks like a limited hangout. Read what Judicial Watch presents. The context and the operation are much, much larger:

“Mexican drug cartels have conducted more than 9,000 drone flights into U.S. airspace in the last year to surveil American law enforcement and security operations in the southern border region, a senior Homeland Security official told Judicial Watch this week. The drones are observing federal, state, county, and city agencies near the Mexican border, including the U.S. Border Patrol, Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas National Guard, county sheriffs and local police. The Border Patrol, which operates under Customs and Border Protection (CBP), has captured about a dozen of the drones, and accessed the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ (UAVs) guidance and memory systems to gain intelligence information, according to a high-level official at the agency.”

“Judicial Watch learned about the Mexican cartel drone incursions during a recent visit to the southern border and specifically while interviewing federal officials at the CBP Rio Grande Valley sector in Texas. Judicial Watch is further investigating the matter and has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with CBP, the 60,000-member agency charged with keeping terrorists and their weapons out of the U.S., for all records regarding the use of drones by criminal organizations operating along the U.S.-Mexico border for the purpose of surveilling U.S. law enforcement officials or otherwise facilitating illegal activity. The federal public-record request includes, but is not limited to, all information depicting the known or estimated number of instances of the use of such technology, as well as all reports, intelligence assessments, analyses, or similar records related to their use.”

“Federal officials on the ground tell Judicial Watch that the cartels use the UAV surveillance flights to facilitate human smuggling and drug trafficking. Specifically, they help identify gaps in border coverage and assist the cartels in overwhelming certain areas to create a diversion for moving sensitive or high value loads through alternate border locations…Brandon Judd, the president of the union representing the nation’s 20,000 Border Patrol agents, told Judicial Watch the drones are also used to smuggle small amounts of drugs into the U.S…”

However you want to slice it, this is war. This is an incursion into US airspace. This is part of the Mex cartel battle plan.

If the US responded by sending its own superior drones into the skies, to take down the cartel drones, the people of America would wake up to the extent and depth of what is happening at the southern border…and how open borders and unlimited immigration are integral pieces of the plan to drown the US in killer drugs.

Then we might see some meaningful action against illegal immigration.

Of course, untold numbers of people living at or near the border might experience chunks of destroyed drones falling into their yards or on their heads. There is that.

So the Pentagon would have to be careful about where the Mexican drones are flying when they’re destroyed.

And what about locating the centers from which the Mex drones are being launched and controlled? What about sending teams of Special Ops soldiers to knock out those centers? Because, again, this IS war.

I’m sure the US news media would cover these Special Ops attacks—waking up people to what is actually going on at the border.

Or is the Pentagon too busy installing LBQTVIUVYTFR+ rules and regs and re-education programs to think about defending America from killer drugs?

Surely, DARPA has come up with ways to disable drones’ tracking and recording and photographing systems. Why aren’t those methods being deployed?

As you can see, the Mex cartels aren’t just a bunch of stupid mules with guns humping cocaine and fentanyl. They’re smart. They’re formidable. They’re, well, a lot like the CIA in certain respects, carrying out carefully planned ops to destabilize nations. Only in this case, they’re destabilizing us.

But we’re not supposed to see that. We’re supposed to believe unlimited immigration and open borders are messianic, are utopian, are reflective of our caring and our sympathy and our good will and our essentially kind nature and our religious values.

We’re supposed to think that ANY attack against the people of America is righteous and justified, because it’s basically our fault.

We’re not supposed to wake up to the con.

We’re supposed to stand aside, while millions of people here at home are hooked on the drugs flowing up through the border, and their lives are ruined and many, many of them die.

And we’re supposed to vote for politicians who don’t have the balls to fight this war, who back down, who give in, who say it’s no use, who at best make noises about open borders but do nothing in the long run.

We’re supposed to send weapons to the Ukraine, but nothing to our own border.

While we’re already at war. HERE.


SOURCES:

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/border-baja-california/story/2022-02-11/drones-border-tecate

judicialwatch.org/cartels-fly-drones-into-us/


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

As President, I wouldn’t shake hands with air

Nor would I make a political statement about Time

Attention: Mike Lindell, CEO of My Pillow

by Jon Rappoport

April 21, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

The Idiocracy advances.

On April 14th, after making a speech in North Carolina, Biden turned to his right side—no one was there, no one was close to being there—and he extended his hand to shake no one’s hand.

If he were a CEO at a Board meeting or a construction supervisor addressing his men, there would have been a follow-up. Meaning: significant people would be saying to each other, “This guy’s lost it, we have to replace him NOW.”

But because he’s the President, that can’t happen. Apparently.

You see, when you’re the President, it would too embarrassing for the country to dismiss you and send you away for being off your rocker.

The embarrassment factor outweighs any damage you’re doing to the country in your demented incoherent condition.

That’s where America is right now, after many decades of creating special considerations for “differently abled” persons. And after handing out trophies for participation.

We’ve gone so far down that road—and into the woods—we have to stand by and excuse the President, even if he launches nukes at Russia. Under no conditions are we permitted to remove the Commander-in-Chief from the field because he may be thinking the capital of Russia is Baltimore.

It wouldn’t be nice. It wouldn’t be polite. It wouldn’t be tolerant. It wouldn’t be inclusive.

“The test of inclusiveness, you see, is, can we abide a President who is demonstrably seeing what isn’t there…”

Show the man some sympathy. Show the man some love.

But just in case he is removed, or steps down, or falls down, we have Kamala Harris, who will stride forward and take charge.

Alas, her gaffes and strangenesses rival Biden’s. Putting aside her misplaced giggles, cackles, and booming laughs at jokes no one else has heard, she said the following, in defense of White House COVID edicts, in January:

“It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down.”

In a similar vein, she also said this, without reference to any nearby context: “The significance of the passage of time, right? The significance of the passage of time. So when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time … there is such great significance to the passage of time.”

You can, if you really want to, claim she is doing Zen. She is trying to wake us up by pointing to the Big Picture.

Or you can say she is smoking a tremendous amount of weed.

Or she’s, well, clearly out of her mind.

Here’s the thing. To have to make those distinctions and then come to a conclusion, is not really what you want to be doing, as the person in question is ascending to the Presidency of the United States—replacing a man who was himself demented.

Just as bizarre as anything Biden or Kamala is performing, is the silence of the news media. You’d think some reporter would ask Jen Psaki, “Who was the President shaking hands with the other day? Who did he think was there?”

And when Psaki deflected the question—angrily, of course—because it was so IMPOLITE—the reporter would press her. He’d refuse to back down.

He’d turn to his colleagues in the room and say, “Come on. Stand up. We’re all thinking the same thing. The President of the United States is unfit to serve. He’s lost his marbles. He’s a whack-job.”

But no.

You just can’t do that. You have to tip-toe around it. In private.

Even though some members of the President’s Party and some of his supporters are making noises about launching a nuclear attack on Russia.

You see, this isn’t like Mommy telling the kids Daddy’s cuts and bruises came from an accident at work, when in fact Daddy is a falling-down drunk.

The situation is a bit more serious.

This is Daddy having MILLIONS of pals who will eagerly cover up his drinking, even though he drives and swerves around town in a giant truck loaded with Cruise missiles. And boxes of vaccine vials that have produced over a million injuries (so far).

That’s why I want to see a major corporation like IBM or Apple sponsor a surprise network live-streamed Biden INTERVENTION.

The ratings would shatter all records.

“We know you think you’re OK, Joe, but you aren’t. Sit right where you are. We’re going to have you watch a collection of your gaffes. They’re really outrageous.”

And if the corporations decline to provide a much needed service to the nation, Mike Lindell, the CEO of My Pillow, can stage a mock intervention and live stream it, using an old man made up to look like Biden.

I think at least a few million people would watch. What do you think?

My public relations team and I keep floating innovative ideas at no charge. We work tirelessly for the greater good.

We’re huddling to consider what to do with Kamala, “in time,” once we get Joe out of the way.

I know. Pelosi would be next in the Presidential line of succession, after Kamala.

It’s almost as if a sequence of loons was pre-planned and set up, in order to inflict maximum damage.

And don’t forget Trump. He hyped his Warp Speed vaxx project to the sky, and he’s still promoting the vastly destructive shot as if it’s a miracle.

So the expanded lineup would read: Trump, Fauci (de facto interim President), Biden, Harris, Pelosi.

We have work to do.

Starting with the Biden intervention.


power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Massive immigration: humane or an invasion at the end of the Empire?

by Jon Rappoport

April 18, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

The American Immigration Council reports that, as of 2019, there were 44.9 million immigrants living in the US.

In case you’ve been living in a cave, the Biden administration is trying its best to make the southern border a sieve.

But of course, this is a humane act. It has to be. Otherwise, it’s a plan to overwhelm public services, ramp up the Democratic vote, and generally stage a soft invasion whose result will be catastrophic.

For many people, 44.9 million immigrants—or the other figure I found a few months ago, 50 million—are not nearly enough. 44.9 million reflects nothing more than stone cold indifference to suffering.

“Humane” and “caring” mean there must be NO CEILING on immigration. No end to it.

In fact, you can find churches across America whose pastors and parishioners will tell you exactly that. These proud people are evidently tuned into a special broadcast by God or a special edition of the Bible.

How THEY FEEL is the most important factor. To them. Beyond that, no thinking is necessary.

Any suffering of any kind anywhere in the world that might be mitigated by living in the US has one remedy: open borders.

And I’m not even talking about the hordes of American Lefties for whom virtue signaling is a profession. For those credentialed people, life itself IS unlimited immigration.

As I’ve written before, and will write again, open borders is an elite operation, and one of its purposes is supporting the transport of drugs into the US—a trillion-dollar business involving the washing of money through major banks.

The drugs ruin and kill huge numbers of people here in America. The drugs are extremely effective weapons of war. Those who physically survive do so with addled minds.

If you need to bring yourself up to speed on this, talk to an honest DEA agent who has seen the effects up close and personal. Or someone who has lost a relative.

Drugs are taking down America. This has been going on for 50 years.

But again, what’s important about open borders is how people FEEL about them. What open borders REPRESENTS to them. What open borders SYMBOLIZES. All the “me” factors.

And even then, the FEELING has an interesting limit. How many families in America do you think have taken in at least three immigrants to live with them—you know, PERSONALLY AND PERMANENTLY?

Much of American Culture is now being performed like a stage play, and the play is often by proxy, on social media. That’s where the action is.

This is very good for the enemies of America. It means millions of people can support destructive issues like open borders via Twitter; so there is no real involvement. Which makes activism easy. Which makes passivity and blindness to what is actually happening easy.

What does “enemies of America” mean? It means the people who want to take down what is left of individual freedom—including the 1st and 2nd Amendments and private property—and what is left of the free market, in which people actually earn a living through their own independent efforts—substituting, instead, control by government.

Globalists view America as the last bastion against a system of planetary governance.

Whenever possible, they applaud American foreign policy operations that seek to extend the Nationalistic Empire; because those operations sooner or later will blow back on America and make its situation and standing in the world more dire. Hastening its collapse.

But there is a difference between individual freedom and the free market, on the one hand…and the American Empire, on the other.

Differentiating between the two, and untangling the former from the latter—this is a herculean task.

Ron Paul understood it. Millions of people who have misplaced their faith in Donald Trump understand it.

Untangling the core values of America from the Empire of America is made all the harder by tons and tons and tons of physically and mentally destructive drugs coming up through open borders, and by many of the migrants who are coming here and overloading the system of public services, gaming the system, and voting for the system.

If you can’t see that, look harder.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.