What is a disease without a cause?

by Jon Rappoport

February 4, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

A disease without a cause is a business model.

You make a list of symptoms. You say many people are experiencing this cluster of symptoms.

You give a label to this list of symptoms. A name. The name of a disease or a disorder or a syndrome.

Over time, through promotion, the name sticks.

You fund research to find the cause of the disease. This research can stretch out for a long time. Possibly forever.

Meanwhile, you develop and sell drugs to treat the disease. Money.

You keep reporting “progress” on finding the cause. “At first, we looked for environmental factors. But now we know the basis is almost certainly genetic. We’re homing in on the specific genetic dysfunction…”

Over time, what’s forgotten is this: is there really a single disease with a single cause?

And think it through; if you can’t verify a single cause, you don’t have a disease. You just have the original list of symptoms.

Alzheimer’s would be an example. Microcephaly (babies born with small heads and brain damage) would be another. The disease names seem to carry the day. “Well, if there’s a name, a label, there must be a unique disease.”


If there’s a name, a label, there is money.

Money for research, for drug development, money from drug and vaccine sales.

Researchers are tasked with making the list of symptoms seem compelling. “We’ve done brain studies. There are remarkable similarities among patients who have Disease X. As you can see from these scans, in Figure A…”

Still, no dice. No verified cause. Therefore, no justification for using the disease label or claiming you have found a unique disease.

But it doesn’t matter, because the business model is working well.

Here’s another example. ADHD. Has a single cause been found for this list of symptoms? No. Therefore, there is no laboratory test for ADHD. No test to confirm the diagnosis of ADHD. Because a test would detect the cause is present in the patient—and there is no cause to look for.

In fact, if you examine the complete catalog of all so-called mental disorders—about 300 of them—there is no defining lab test for ANY of them. Not a one. Each so-called disorder is simply a list of behaviors which have been clustered together by committees of psychiatrists and given a name. ADHD. Bipolar. Clinical depression. And so on.

But it doesn’t matter. Because the business model is working. Money is pouring in. Drugs are selling.

Let’s take this even further. A hundred years of Rockefeller medicine have “established” that there are thousands of separate and distinct and unique diseases, disorders, and syndromes. And each one has a cause. For many diseases, the cause “hasn’t been discovered yet.” Meaning: “We’re writing fiction. We have no justification for calling these diseases, diseases.”

For many other diseases, researchers claim, the causes have been found. The most popular type of cause? A virus.

A virus that had never been seen before. A virus that was “discovered” in a lab.

A lab—as I’ve discussed in depth—that lets in no outsiders, no truly independent observers, to see, in detail, what’s actually going on.

For that reason, and several others, there is no solid reason to believe these viruses, these causes are actually being discovered. Are actually real.

Which leaves us with thousands of lists of symptoms.

But there is always a business model. The full Rockefeller model is worth trillions of dollars. More dollars every day.

The drugs and the vaccines are the $$$ payoff.

I’ve spent decades demonstrating their toxicity.

Here’s a very interesting medical trick. A criminal trick. The researchers say a brain disorder called ABC exists but they haven’t found the cause yet. A parent has a child with severe problems and takes him to the doctor. The doctor pronounces a diagnosis: “Yes, your boy has ABC.”

The parent goes away and does some research. The list of symptoms for ABC could be the result of a vaccine. In fact, the boy developed his severe problems quite soon after vaccination.

She goes back to the doctor and says, “I think my son was damaged by the vaccine.”

The doctor says, “That’s impossible. Your boy is suffering from ABC. And you see, we’ve done studies of boys with ABC, and many of them were never vaccinated. So when you say the cause of your boy’s ABC was a vaccine, we’ve ruled that out.”

The parent doesn’t know what to do.

Of course, the trick is, ABC was never proved to be a unique disorder in the first place. It’s really the NAME of an unproven disorder. The studies the doctor is referring to are completely irrelevant.

ABC is a disorder without a proven cause. Therefore, it is no disorder at all. It’s just a list of symptoms.

The parent’s boy has many of those symptoms. He acquired them—and the damage he suffered—from a vaccine. If you wanted to put a name to what the boy has, call it what it is: vaccine damage.

Not ABC.

Part of the business model for ABC is: “We use that disease label so we can avoid having to pay out huge compensation-dollars for damage caused by a vaccine.”

If the impact of this trick isn’t getting through to you, let me give you a grossly exaggerated analogy.

Engineers claim there is a phenomenon called River Floundering. It is unique but the cause hasn’t yet been found. The basic symptom is: boats on rivers develop the propensity to sink.

Joe takes his boat out on a river. Overhead, a bridge collapses and destroys his boat. Joe barely escapes with his life. After six months, he emerges from the hospital and sues a number of parties.

But he loses his case. In court, experts testify that his boat was suffering from River Floundering. That’s why it sank. Many studies of Floundering show bridges-collapsing did not occur when “the sinking happened.” Therefore, the collapsing bridge was not the cause of Joe’s boat’s disorder, River Floundering.

What is a disease without a cause?

A business model.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

61 comments on “What is a disease without a cause?

  1. Theo says:

    These drug/vaccine pushers are as adept as the central bankers in their levels of sheer sorcery

  2. Bernardo Paratore says:

    Brilliant article. Alter title: “Health care for dummies.”

  3. Opie Poik says:

    Don Corleone branches out into pHARMa protection racket.

    Nothing personal – it’s all business.

  4. “A disease without a cause” Every real disease has a cause.

    • Don psncho says:

      There is no disease. Only lack of consciousness

    • Myles says:

      Dis-ease can be caused by a myriad of factors, all of which have one common denominator: toxins.

      Toxins, in various forms, poison the Body. When the Body becomes saturated and overburdened with toxins, it inherently seeks to detoxify itself (‘immunity’) and create homeostasis/life/equilibrium/balance – Health. Heal Thyself. We inherently Health(yself).

      Now, depending on the individual, their habits and what they consume and are exposed too, in varying degrees, each Body will react uniquely. (These are what real Science would call ‘controls’.)

      And then we see what Jon is talking about; lists of symptoms, with individuals have some or less similarities in their conditions, their Health.

      There is but one simple ‘treatment’ for ALL dis-ease.

      Remove the Cause, and allow the Body to do what it inherently, constantly, seeks to do; health.

      But the caveat; the cause is almost always choice.

      Stop eating, ingesting, drinking. Stop moving, exerting energy. The Body manages the energy within, spending it uselessly will only discontinue the healing process.

      Do not drink the magic elixir, take the magic pill. Do not herb or holistic, therapy or remedy.

      Simple remove the Cause – Choice. And rest, warmly, in fresh air, consuming nothing but the purest of water, the fundamental fuel of life.

      The Body will do the rest.

      ALL dis ease is reversible, curable, can be remedied and treated. Just remove the choice.

      • Inna Kreer says:

        It’s not easy to remove the Cause. Air, food, water are polluted. Globalists successfully destroyed all branches of medicine except pharmacology. With the level of modern technology that we have now, the only medicine that should be in use is energy medicine, which started developing, but has been suppressed by Big Pharma.

    • Ni.. says:

      PS: the previous comment was *sarcasm*, the article and video are excellent and relevant, and the author of the former’s *not* a religious zealot.

  5. This is brilliant! We must all try to get this article to go viral. I believe it might strike a chord with many people who are blind to the manipulation of the medical profession.

    Please keep writing about this. You are telling the truth!

  6. Mos Craciun says:

    Another business model : “AIDS” . There is no relation cause-effect between HIV ( if exists) and several symptoms under the umbrella ( label ) “AIDS “.

  7. Opie Poik says:

    Last “gasp” of mask hysteria, before all vaxageddon shutdown mandates are ended (only to be replaced by nukyular Armageddon?):

    “Make It Stop: Scientists Find Putting Pantyhose on Your Head Creates a Better Seal, Makes Masks Safer”

    Naturally, our “betters” want us to put undergarments on our heads. Gorilla glue works even better. Test it on Fauci, first. Happy Friday, y’all! Beer o’clock in 3, 2, 1 . . .

  8. Opie Poik says:

    The verdict on the “River Floundering” case nullifies the “post boat, ergo propter boat” argument asserted by counsel for the Plaintiff. The Big Guys win again, thanks to Dewey, Cheatem & Howe, PLLC.


  9. Doug says:

    Jon you are so right on. I was in pharma for 35 years. What has happened over the years has turned my stomach. It is so rampant. I loved what I did but did not know all of what went on in the background. Thanks for all you do.

  10. Roundball Shaman says:

    “A disease without a cause is a business model… If there’s a name, a label, there is money.”

    ‘Why are there wars, Daddy?’

    It’s about the Money.

    ‘Why do They want to make us sick, Daddy?’

    They want to make the Money.

    ‘Why do things cost so much, Daddy?’

    They go into business to make Money.

    ‘Why do some people go into Politics, Daddy?’

    They want to be Rich.

    ‘Why do some people become TV preachers, Daddy?’

    They found another way to get Rich.

    ‘Why did Mommy marry you, Daddy?’

    It’s about the Mone… UHHH… I mean, it’s about the MOUNTAINS of fun we knew we would have together!…

    ‘Hey Daddy… can I PLEASE have my allowance now!’

    Sure kid. You’re a quick learner.

    ‘And by the way… NICE SAVE!’

    • Eluard says:

      “Nice Save.”

      I could say the same about you, R.S.

      Children are far shrewder than we give them credit for.

    • Courageous Lion says:

      A rather interesting book I’ve read before claims that the root of all evil is the “LOVE OF MONEY”. In our class it’s the “LOVE OF Federal Reserve Notes which are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom – they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) over 50 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT.” So it could be said that the LOVE OF INSTRUMENTS OF LEGALIZED THEFT is the root of all evil. At least during this time in history!

    • Rosline Loutsios says:

      RoundballShamann –

      Absolutely delicious!

      This is a sure way of creating dis-ease.

  11. Stef says:

    Unfortunately, even if this type of information did go viral, I don’t think the sleeping masses would wake up. You can’t fix stupid.

    “Consider how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”

    ~George Carlin

  12. Eluard says:

    I just watched, in real time, Reiner Fuellmich’s team, he and a female lawyer and Dr. Wodarg, interviewing Stefan Lanka and Andrew Kaufman.

    Many of us have been waiting over a year to see this happen. In a word, it was a Disaster. And I believe, it was yes, planned to be so.

    Kaufman started off a little nervously but very capably giving a summary of why virology is not valid, the original Enders’ papers on Measles, etc. He spoke of the supposed Sars-Cov-2 genome and how it’s been “cobbled together” and a few other things. Very good.

    Then Lanka came in and the problems began–technically–his connection came in and out. Now that gave a chance for Dr. Wodarg to go on the Offensive. He started a full frontal attack on not only what Dr. Kaufman had stated but what Lanka had only haltingly been able to express.

    What Wodarg did was make the whole discussion about “viral theory” in general–and NOT the evidence that both Kaufman and Lanka have for disproving the existence of Sars-Cov-2. He was antagonistic and rather rude. This ticked Kaufman off who began interrupting Wodarg, trying to clarify the issues.

    From there it went off the rails. Lanka came back and talked about virology in general which is exactly what Wodarg wanted–so he could come back and say “well, how do children transmit smallpox to each other,” and never really absorbing what either gentleman was trying to express.

    I perceived it as a pre-planned strategy. They HAD to have them on because so many have called for their presence on the committee. But the idea was to undermine them from the beginning. Reiner said NOTHING (until late) to allow them to express their visions of the situation.

    Kaufman finished with a brilliant 3 or 4 minute statement. And Reiner with his gracious manner said some nice things. But it was VERY disapppointing. Pretty ugly too.

    • Rico Debiase says:

      That’s unfortunately NOT surprising (reminds me of the Kaufman/Mikovits debacle). It’s becoming clearer now WHO are the Controlled Opposition & who are genuine, curious individuals so “they” have to “nip it in the bud” somehow. & people’s egos are also involved. It took Mike “The Health Ranger” some time to acknowledge Kaufman & Tom Cowan’s arguments & to his credit: he did. Not many “highly educated/specialized” folk can check their egos at the door, & quite a “few” of them have overinflated views of themselves

      • Eluard says:

        You gotta watch this when it gets posted. There was something weird about the whole thing.

        Reiner really surprised me that he didn’t speak up for these two guys to at LEAST make their case.

        That Dr. Wodard… Something ain’t right there.

        • Lyn P says:

          I HIGHLY recommend Dr. Tom Cowan’s response to this episode which can be found on his BitChute channel, the first 10 minutes of his Feb. 4 webinar.

          Check off yet more members of the “controlled op” set which I’ve come to define and those “who have the capability but JUST WON’T GO THERE – THE FULL TRUTH.”

    • nmbsp says:

      You are correct. This was planned. They had to bring them on, and they specifically tried to undermine them, and the truth. You can see that they didn’t talk about the main points at all, they carefully avoided everything, and you can also see the personal attack, particularly against Stefan, and you can also see the co-ordination of the three, and also, the direct statement of the “you are distracting (and causing harm…)” line which has appeared suddenly in the last month, and is being followed by all of the tools and useful idiots of the system…
      And I don’t think that it was a disaster in that sense. Because it shows you that they are controlled, for anyone that still had doubts about it, and more importantly, because it shows you that they have no argument. Not a single one of all the attackers has talked about the actual points and discuss the details. They have nothing.

      But here is where the problem is, and why this was kind of was a disaster indeed, in a sense. Andy had at least four very clear chances to slam them, and he didn’t. The point he made about the true causes of illness, should have been made when rabies was brought up. He should have said “Well, don’t you want to know whether the cause is a “virus” or not? If you don’t know if it is that or not, how are you going to help the people”?

      Then, when they talked about “science” and “viruses”, he should have said “Ok, so where is your proof then? Where is your proof of the “viruses”, and the causation of illness, infection, and viral transmission? And where is your proof that the vaccines have helped and have saved people’s lives?”

      Then, when the definitions argument was brought up (that anyone can define anything they want, and then come up with theories…), he should have said “Exactly. And that is what is happening with the term “virus” that has been arbitrarily redefined from “poison/toxin” to “infectious pathogenic particle that chases living beings around to take over their cells and replicate and make them ill”, and then (unproven) theories are made on that, all built on an assumption that has never been proven”.

      And then, when it was said that “you have to present an alternative theory/hypothesis”, and “you have to prove that “viruses” don’t exist”, he should have said “No, I do not have to present an alternative hypothesis and I do not have to prove anything of the sort. I am showing that the evidence presented to support the existence of “viruses” is false, and that “viruses” are not, and have never been, proven. And you can not possibly provide proof that something that doesn’t exist, doesn’t exist. The burden of proof is on the side who makes the claim of the existence.”.

      And this last one especially, is something that we all must realize and always remember. Because you can see for example how you also write “the evidence that both Kaufman and Lanka have for disproving the existence”. We don’t bring evidence to disprove the existence or to prove the non-existence, and we don’t need evidence for it. We’re showing that what THEY are presenting, is false. The burden on proof is on them, not on us. We do not need to present any evidence of non-existence, we do not need to explain what each “illness”/”symptom” comes from, and we do not need to present “cures” (although we would be happy to discuss what we think and what we know about them).

      It is very important for all of us to realize this, to remember that THEY have the burden of proof, and to be able to give this response when we have to directly and immediately, as Andy also should have done.

      • Eluard says:

        nmbsp, you make some great points.

        Actually, Andy did say something like “No, I do not have to present an alternative hypothesis and I do not have to prove anything of the sort. I am showing that the evidence presented to support the existence of “viruses” is false…” Or rather, he TRIED to say that but Wodarg kept talking over him. Then when Andy (and later Stefan) tried to speak up they made it SEEM like they were being obstreperous, uncooperative, almost “unprofessional” if you will.

        I think he did his best in that very odd situation. The technical problem with Stefan’s connection unfortunately gave them the perfect opportunity to pursue their obvious strategy of both ignoring and degrading their presentations. I see your point about viruses in general but I thought the real issue was they kept pulling the two men away from the crux of Sars-Cov-2 and especially Stefan’s amazing CONTROL experiments. He NEVER got a chance to go into those! which blow the whole thing apart.

        Yes, very true, they don’t need to “dis” prove anything, merely to show the absence of real science on the other side. My friend said the same, in a positive vein, that perhaps it wasn’t a “disaster” in truth. That now, as you wrote, we can see who’s really WHO and how to move forward.

        Thank you for that.

      • Alan Kwan says:

        That’s exactly the problem of a real-time debate, as Jon has pointed out in his Jan 25 article.

    • Lyn P says:

      Thanks for this summary/commentary. I saw about the first half live but had to disconnect when Lanka came back to regroup.

      Wodarg has an unacceptable pompousness IMO, and I’ve thought for a while that he is not beneficial to the committee. He always needs to drone on for extended times as if he is as important as any of the actual guests. Does not know how to construct questions.

      Some live commenters were ribbing on Dr. K which only revealed their own intellectual limits, but there was one great comment stating “Wodarg does not understand science.”

    • Geo Martin says:

      Fuellmich popped up out of nowehere in 2020 and has been saying he’s building a case, a Nuremberg 2.0 of sorts since then. He’s always ‘almost’ there but nothing real ever happens, and it never will.

      Once the current most draconian restrictions are removed (leaving less obvious yet insidious others in place forever), he and his cohort will become reduntant and slowly vanish into the sunset.

      That was his role, to keep the dissident people hoping someone is doing something somewhere to get through this brunt of this phase of the agenda without interruption, and that’s what’s happened.

      Kauffman and Cowan have in mind a different health management philosophy, so if they’re serious and genuine, they shouldn’t debate or engange with the reps of the old system. It’s a waste of time and energy.

    • Rosline Loutsios says:

      Eluard – Could you, please, provide us the link? Thanks.

  13. Jim S Smith says:

    SIDS comes to mind.

    How many children mysteriously “died” in the sleep at so young an age?

    How about “Shaken-baby syndrome”? ? ?

    How many very young children died – and how many families were legally destroyed by false convictions of “cruelty to children” – all because of a poison that destroyed their deceased-childrens’ health? ? ? ? ? ?


    You just scraped the tip of another huge iceberg that our “big-pharma” companies and “medical establishment” have gotten away with cold-blooded murder, and in many cases: The parents suffered additionally!

    And NOW folks wonder WHY I want NOTHING to do with ANY such “vaccines”, “drugs”, and whatever other questionable, artificial pharmaceutical products.

    There is far more to this sad story than most remember!

    – JSSmith

  14. AJ says:

    The light continues to shine into the dark. The dark continues to block the light at every opportunity. Only those that diligently seek the light will find it. The rest will never know the views exposed by the light. But when the sun finally bursts and devours the dark it will be too late for the lost. A flash light only lasts a short time and once depleted you are again in the dark. Learn to live in the light. Much easier to see, observe, understand things and secure your safety.

  15. “The doctor pronounces a diagnosis””

    DIE-agnosis. The med-tech-cartel is NOT a model based on health, it is a model based on profit from people’s fear and refusal to take care of their own health**. It’s part of the death-cult.

    **Caveat: Disease-causing environmental toxins including EMFs are not generally induced by individual people on themselves but by death-cult corporations.

  16. Ort says:

    Jon’s use of the hypothetical “ABC” disorder prompts me to discuss another acronym– in this case an ostensibly real disorder that nevertheless can’t quite be pinned down, but which serves the medical/pharmaceutical business model exactly as Jon describes.

    I must provide a bit of background: Dr. L. has been my primary care physician for decades, although I’ve avoided him since the Megadeath Virus(es) of Doom scamdemic was launched in March 2020. Just out of residency, he took over the practice of my former doctor, who passed away suddenly.

    Dr. L. is personably low-key, and over the years has commendably avoided over-prescribing meds; he’s not one to mindlessly push the latest toxins du jour hawked by Big Pharma salespersons. However, even though he is a Doctor of Osteopathy– a DO rather than an MD– he does preach conventional vaccine dogma.

    I never bought into the “annual flu shot” scam, so I freely ignored Dr. L.’s routine recommendations to get them. However, in recent years (I’m 66), I did dutifully get “age-appropriate” vaccinations, e.g. pneumonia and shingles. The shingles vax episode had a twist: a year after I got it, Dr. L. advised me that I needed to get it again, because the first vaccine had been proven ineffective– a cautionary tale in its own right I won’t detail here.

    I have no reason or evidence to think that any of the vaccine jabs, including that ineffective shingles vaccine, actually injured me. However, much later, an annual blood test revealed a slightly low white blood cell count. Dr. L. explained that “You may have a condition called ITP. It stands for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. ‘Idiopathic’ means that we don’t know what causes it.” He accordingly referred me to a hematologist for further investigation.

    Fortunately for me, the hematologist confirmed that my marginally low white blood cell count didn’t indicate ITP; it’s worth mentioning that the hematologist did say that we ought to “keep an eye” on my blood chemistry, and I obligingly scheduled a return visit in six months. This April, 2020 follow-up appointment was canceled due to the scamdemic lockdowns, I declined the “telemedicine” alternative, and haven’t been back since.

    (What would a “telemedicine” visit to a hematologist entail, anyway? Pricking one’s finger so the hematologist could visually inspect the resulting drop of blood?)

    Incidentally, “ITP” is one of those acronyms that is used inconsistently in medical literature; the “I” is also said to stand for “immune” instead of “idiopathic”; I don’t know if this is accidental, or if someone in the system realized that the weasel word “idiopathic” might raise inconvenient questions.

    Although I felt that I’d somehow dodged a bullet, my wheels were turning and my crap detectors began sounding off; Dr. L’s words stuck in my mind. Not only his brief explanation of “ITP”, but the matter-of-fact way it was expressed, troubled me– all the more because Dr. L. is truly a nice guy, not supercilious, devious, or malicious.

    One of the first widely-reported “COVID” post-vaccine deaths occurred in January 2021 when a doctor in Florida died two weeks after getting a “COVID” pseudo-vaccination; his white blood cell count plummeted so rapidly that no treatment was effective. Even the pro-vax mass-media reported that he’d died from ITP, “which has been associated with vaccination”.

    When I saw that familiar acronym, I was electrified. All of the foregoing crystallized into a dismal insight into how depraved and treacherous the system is to patients or “end-users”. If I had indeed been diagnosed with ITP, I realized, even the possibility that it might be vaccine-related would never have been brought up. I wouldn’t have made the possible connection, and even though Dr. L. is conscientious and well-meaning, I’m certain that he would automatically discount the possibility.

    After all, “idiopathic” means that “we” don’t know what causes it! But one must never badmouth vaccines. Moreover, even if Dr. L. or a colleague admitted a possible connection, what recourse would I have? Hunting for a rare “anti-vaxxer” lawyer to take an expensive, grueling, and ultimately fruitless trip to the Vaccine Kangaroo Court?

    No, if I suffered a vaccine injury Dr. L. would simply take the injury at face value, avoid or deny even the question of whether a vaccine might have caused it, and step up treatment to address the injury. I would meet a boatload of new specialists– like the hematologist– and help them all make their boat payments.

    “Business model” indeed!

    • Alan Kwan says:

      “Idiopathic” is just a camouflage word for “iatrogenic”.

    • Ragtime Reggie says:

      Dave Mustaine may take slight offense but I’m assuming he agrees and won’t mind 😉
      Just teasing

    • Lyn P says:

      I have chronic ITP. At my time of diagnosis it was “early” in the guidelines of approaches to it, although some methods have not changed. It is not about white cell count but lack of platelets – hence the “purpura” which is another name for spotting from blood into the skin.

      I believe they moved from the “I” meaning Immune to “Idiopathic” so they could tacitly remove Iatrogenic-caused dysregulation to the body’s health system. To Alan K.’s point.

      The Miami doc you reference did die from ITP-induced by the jab; they attempted to stop his internal bleeding for some days but failed.

      While she’s one of the virology worshippers, Dr. Mikovits does place blame for ITP on the MMR shot and I’m in agreement.

  17. Courageous Lion says:

    Of course the SYMPTOMS people may be having couldn’t possibly be caused by a lack of sunlight, too much glyphosphate exposure, electro magnetic pollution, GMO food,lack of exercise, too much carb or sugar intake, being way over weight, having a head on collision with a semi because they were texting, too much alcohol consumption, the use of aluminum contaminated under arm deodorant that blocks the bodies ability to eliminate toxins through the under arm glands, wearing a mask that cuts off your oxygen intake, builds up Co2 in your bloodstream, causes bacteria that you body was trying to eliminate to back up in your lungs….heck someone could write a 1000 page BOOK on the symptoms or they can lump all of them caused by my list under one name…CONvid 19(84)

  18. Sixway says:

    “You fund research to find the cause of the disease. This research can stretch out for a long time. Possibly forever.”

    I have to disagree with this. When did they ever look for the cause of say…. breast cancer?

    Back towards the beginning of my enlightenment, I often wondered why there was no Race For The Cause. (rather than cure)

    Since removing cause is 1000000 times more effective than any cure.

  19. BDBinc says:

    So true.

    The cause of an effect( symptoms) if that cause is unknown cannot possibly be said to be claimed as a treatment for it.

    The Rockefeller medical system deals in drugs for unknown causes, drugs that can temp alter some effects( also using the merits of the observers effect and placebo effect ) and the drugs will cause new effects which are then subjected to more drugs.

    Making people chronically sick is the medical system business as sick people are profitable.

    Which is why we need to move to a better system of preventative (through awareness of what is a healthy lifestyle) .The body is not void of intelligence / Life or the capacity to heal.

    Haha you can say “ADD” is an effect of (TV and gaming) conditioning/ culture in the age of information (addiction).
    Or as for most its a media mis-inforamtion addiction.

  20. Tracy Kolenchuk says:

    What is a disease without a cause? Incurable.

    But, it’s important to distinguish between two types of causes – past causes and present causes. Past causes are statistical, hypothetical – “SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID” is a statistical past cause. Past causes are perfect for developing preventatives. If we create a vaccine to fight the virus, we can “prevent” COVID statistically. But we can’t cure COVID by addressing the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many, perhaps most identified SARS-CoV-2 infections never develop the COVID-19 disease, just as most cases of the virus that causes the common cold – never cause the common cold.

    A curable illness is cured when the “present cause” is addressed. A SARS-CoV-2 infection has been cured when the virus (assuming it exists) is no longer present. But a case of COVID, the disease, is not necessarily cured. Many cases of COVID ARDS, for example exist, are present, without the presence of any SARS-CoV-2 infection in the present. To cure COVID ARDS, with must address the present cause. To cure COVID loss of smell, we must address the present cause. To cure COVID pneumonia, we must address the present cause. None of these illnesses require the virus too be present. None of these cures require the virus to be addressed.

  21. liz Bennet says:

    Jon, you’re the best. I think I’ll make a t shirt:

    What is a disease without a cause? A business model.

    What do you think?

  22. Aron says:

    I’m curious to know what anyone understands about the growth of the idea in the general population of the contagion myth in people’s minds over the past two years?

  23. miker says:

    Excellence as usual Jon! The Official Narrative has been showing significant symptoms of “Floundering” for some time as it’s taking-on more truth-pounding than it’s puny bilge pumps can handle. It’s just a matter of time at this point.

  24. john-oranje says:

    There is plenty of information and speculation in this interview in which Dr. Mercola talks with Stephanie Seneff Phd.

    They both seem to believe totally in the existence of sars-cov2 and its variants but maybe that is less important than what they say about the damage caused by the injections.

    Main stream medicine is never going to abandon the idea of contagious pathogens; too much money involved. Also any ‘virus’ will do to cover up pollution and poisoning of the population.


    • Geo Martin says:

      Whatever Dro Mercola has to say about covid is invalid because he’s comeing from the false premise that the cause of illness is a virus that is transmitted from one individual to another, even when the ‘carrier’ has no symptoms. His foundations on this are so off the mark that everyting he adds on top are deemed to flounder.

      And we don’t need a doctor to tell us these vaccines are causing damage, it’s in plain sight.

  25. luckylui says:

    We need a label for the scam so it becomes a part of popular culture.

    I call the crown jewel medical scam a quadruple fck. Occurring when someone who is not sick is convinced they are, then are convinced to take a “cure” of some kind. When a problem arises, say death or injury, with a high correlation to the “cure” they are then convinced they themselves were the cause. The actual crowning comes when: 1) the perp has no liability and 2) the victim had to pay for everything along the way (including indirectly via taxes, insurance, etc).

    When I first became aware this was a real possibility a bout of cognitive dissonance followed. I am cured now (no vax or other meds required) and have no problem seeing it for what it is.

    My label was useful for my own purposes when thinking about the notion but it’s not going to win any marketing awards. Any idea’s Jon? Anyone?

  26. John Riddle says:

    Covid doesn’t exist until you get it.

    I, too, didn’t think it existed. Or I figured it was the flu re-branded.

    You know you have it because it’s unlike any other.

    If the news media and politicians never made any mention of covid collectively people would have been wondering why the flu season was so different this year. Not just heavy hitting but different.

  27. marlene says:

    A disease without a cause is also what the WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a Chinese-sponsored Marxist, will use to declare health crises, based merely on his personal opinion or consideration, once Biden’s WHO amendments are “ratified” – by WHO, not by the US Senate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *