COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

by Jon Rappoport

October 9, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

This is a follow-up to yesterday’s article, in which I exposed the fact that the CDC does not have the COVID coronavirus in its possession, because it is “unavailable.” Their word, not mine.

The CDC is admitting the virus hasn’t been isolated. In other words, its existence is unproven.

You need to realize the CDC, during its own published confession (see below), is discussing this explosive situation in the context of instructing the world how to perform the PCR test.

The test to detect a virus that isn’t there.

This would be on the order of NASA issuing a guide for navigating a fleet of ships to a planet whose existence has not been established—and the population of the whole world is going to board those ships for the voyage.

The CDC is saying: here is how you detect the virus in a human, here is the test on which we’re going to rely, here is the test on the basis of which we’re going to identify all case numbers and demand all lockdowns—except we don’t have the virus.

Why don’t they have it?

Because they can’t isolate it. That’s obvious.

If they could isolate it, they would.

Let’s not tap dance around this central fact. Let’s not make excuses for the CDC. They have a problem the size of Jupiter. It’s their problem, not ours. But they’re foisting their problem on us, in the form of a STORY ABOUT A PANDEMIC. AND ALL THE LOCKDOWNS THAT FLOW FROM THE STORY.

To say this is unacceptable is a vast understatement. The CDC is committing a crime that has no bounds.

For months, I’ve been writing about the “missing virus” and the studies that should be done to prove it exists—real-world studies that have never been done and will never be done. Now, here is the smoking gun.

I’m aware that many scientists and doctors, who are otherwise exposing the pandemic as a fraud on legitimate grounds, don’t want to touch what I’m revealing here. I would remind them that, months ago, when some of us were already exposing the PCR test as unreliable and useless and deceptive, THAT ISSUE was too hot to touch. But now it isn’t.

The issue of the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus may seem as if it’s too hot, but it isn’t. It’s time to launch a full-on attack. Immediately.

The truth is only bitter for those who are hiding it.

I’m also aware there are people who have been building scenarios about how the virus is “activated.” Certain frequencies wake it up, and so on. Well, the question is: WHAT VIRUS? THE ONE THAT ISN’T THERE?

Still other people would say, “Then what are all these scientists sequencing in their labs, if it’s not the virus?” Again, not our problem. They might start with a piece of RNA, and then claim, without proof, it’s part of SARS-CoV-2; and they go to work on it. They claim anything they want to. It’s not science.

If a mechanic says he has a piece of a fender from a car that has never been seen before; if he claims he knows the car exists; but he can’t show you the car; are you going to buy his story? Are you going to invest your life-savings and life-savings of your family and friends in this car he admits is “unavailable?” Are you going to invest and go broke and sit in your home and wear a mask and keep your distance from other people and close your business and declare bankruptcy? Are you going to consent to that?

Another question that arises: if the virus is missing and has never been isolated, has never been proved to exist, what are they putting in the COVID vaccine? That’s a question that should be answered by law-enforcement agencies raiding many facilities and seizing materials and finding honest scientists who will discover what is really in the COVID vaccine brews. Waiting for that to happen…the sun could go dark first. In the meantime, do you want to take the shot in the arm?

Some people have claimed there are “animal models” which prove the coronavirus exists and is harmful, because the animals become sick, when they are “injected with the virus.” This is incorrect on two counts.

First, the animal models are supposed to progress through various species, until they arrive at animals that most closely resemble humans; chimps. The animal models being cited are mice or hamsters, which are very, very low on the totem pole.

Second, what are these mice being injected with? It’s supposed to be pure virus. But instead, it’s a soup which contains all sorts of material, including chemicals. The chemicals could be causing the animals to become ill.

Here is my breaking story about the virus that isn’t there, from yesterday:

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.




As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

149 comments on “COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

  1. Opie Poik says:

    “Pandemics Past”, by a retired Brit physician, commenting on an 1831 book by another Brit doc, also retired and, presumably, expired:

    ” . . . doctors who treated their cholera patients in the way Dr. Hawkins describes were not stupid or wicked men, and yet they believed both absurdities and that they were doing good. Indeed, they were convinced of it: Their experience, they said, proved it to them. Dr. Hawkins quotes one of them to the effect that no patient survived without his treatment, but many did survive with it.”

    Above all, do no ‘arm, ay, mate?

    “The public cannot be too earnestly cautioned against lending an eager ear to the imaginary cases which have been attempted to be fastened on their attention, and which will probably be abundantly supplied…in order to pamper a luxurious appetite for the terrible….” (1831)

    Those who do not learn from misery are doomed to repeat it.

  2. ReluctantWarrior says:

    I seriously doubt that the virus even exists. The tests were designed to pick up positives for viruses in the corona family which could be no more than the common cold or flu. Then the prescribed treatment is applied to people who have compromised immune systems or other underlying conditions including pulmonary conditions which is a large percentage of the population. The current accepted protocols for this faux virus can prove quite deadly. So you get population reduction with a great profit for the coming vaccine and then you get more population reduction. A diabolical scheme by the brain trust of the New World Order to gain control and obedience from world populations. I said early on that social distancing and masks were the tip of the totalitarian spear.

    • Melissa Native says:

      Contrary to what the CDC said on that page, this article says in the abstract that it has been isolated:

      • Ian says:

        You can say anything in study abstract and co cousins. Other doctors and scientists say that nothing has been isolated. See Dr Andrew Kaufman’s website and videos, including London Real. See Dr Rashid Buttar, Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, dr Erickson, Judy Micovitz, etc. There are a lot of people debunking this scam and hoax designed to bring total Orwellian control.

        • Suria says:

          You’re so right. Dont forget Dr. Thomas Cowan 🙂 The Contagion Myth.

        • Charles says:

          So what is the reason why hospitals around the world are overcrowded and dying en masse? Colds and flu don’t do that.

          • BobP says:

            No one wants to say becasue it is disturbing the corporate elite can do this to the planet’s people and then make tons of money off it issuing vaccinations that don’t help. It’s not a vaccination problem. It’s 5g radiation splitting of oxygen molecules in lungs and blood vessels causing breathing problems and emergency wards filling up. You asked many times and now answered. Ugh !!!
            19th June 2018 Qdxiy Comments 0 Comment
            5g is designed to work on the 60ghz frequency which inhibits the orbital properties of electrons in the oxygen molecules and prevents the oxygen molecules from binding to the hemoglobin in our blood. 2.4ghz which has been the standard for years is the frequency of the water molecule which becomes destabilized when exposed.
            This is kill grid technology using weaponized frequencies which will create a series of epidemics resulting in forced vaccinations and massive suffering. People will accept this without question because of our addiction to our gadgets and brainwashing media. Google majestytwelve. Do your research people. Blessings.

          • Bill D says:

            The average death age of Covid patients is above average life expectancy. Health agency guidelines and bonus money for Covid diagnoses in hospitals have resulted in numerous false Covid diagnoses even as the flu and pneumonia have almost disappeared as causes of death.

            But the main reason these people are dying is that the WHO, like American health agencies, is suppressing effective treatments. Instead, patients are told to isolate themselves at home until they get very sick and then go to the hospital. Thus, we have almost eliminated the early treatment that would save 85% of these lives if employed universally.

            The PCR test, which sufficed for a diagnosis all of last year and to this date in many places and for certain populations, produces false positives to such a degree that we know about 90% of the positives are false. No virus can be cultured from the positive sample.

            The “mitigation measures” have resulted in the suppression of early treatment. This fills hospitals like nothing else.

      • Mos Craciun says:

        @Melissa Native

        If you read with attention the abstract you mention , you will see that they worked with only ONE sample from ONE patient. You call that “research” ?!? Especially on such a crucial issue … Conclusion : 34 authors , pretending to be “top experts” in the field, danced around ONE sample from ONE patient and pretend to “discover” a novel virus ! And they got huge money in grants for that !

        Will you marry a man after just ONE encounter ? Oh , you presume that he is James Bond but you see, in science we have different criteria and presumptions are very limited and temporary. Especially when the effect is about to induce freezing of a planet !

        • Marilyn Shepherd says:

          And the German doctor dreamed up a new virus based on a social media post from an opthamoligist in China, now last time I looked he was an eye doctor who wouldn’t know pneumonia if he fell over it.

      • Alan says:

        Isolation without purification is an oxymoron. An Orwellian one, the virologists’ favorite, indeed.

      • scott macneilage says:

        They sequenced RNA fragments that may be from ANYTHING. The test they used INFERS the existence of a virus by identifying effects (CPEs) and by using PCR then to take RNA (protein) fragments and reverse sequence what they say is a virus. GOOD GOD THIS IS SOMEWHAT TECHNICAL BUT NOT REALLY HARD. Here is what Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR had to say about this process:

        “If you have enough things that kinda look like an apple you might think it was an apple…HIV is like that. Those tests (HIV tests) are all based on things that are invisible and the results are inferred…PCR is different than that. It can’t tell you if your sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you.” Go to near the end of the presentation for this statement.

        Also, if you don’t listen to the entire presentation PLEASE at least start at 26:40 and listen to the discussion of how expanded testing and recategorization of diseases as symptoms created a non-existent “syndrome”. Even people who “tested positive” for HIV and had NO SYMPTOMS were destroyed by AZT chemo and then when their blood cells and bone marrow were destroyed their immune systems failed and they died of a rush of infections. SOUND FAMILIAR? Now there is a push to test asymptomatic healthy people with a test that with the right tweaking will provide a positive result for “the virus” in virtually anyone tested and so open the door to the loss of their freedom, toxic treatments and forced vaccinations.

        This is lengthy and sometimes very technical but the recategorization of common diseases or conditions as a scheme to create a cash cow syndrome for Big Pharma and the medical establishment has to be understood in light of our current COOTIES-19 problems. With the AIDS hoax a whole coercive medical legal structure was created to control healthy people who were “diagnosed” as having AIDS simply because of the supposed presence of RNA identified as HIV. This is the most important thing to realize now. How the blueprint for medically terrorizing and controlling healthy people was created.

      • C says:

        It hasn’t been isolated. Watch Dr Kaufman’s channel. They have changed the Kochs postulates protocol. Dr Kaufman broke down what they did. The case against the UK govt is asking for proof it’s been isolated and Pubkic a health England replied they were told by WHO not to bother. The Uk govt still haven’t provided any evidence this was requested in August

      • ak in vt says:

        Hi Melissa Native

        I will add to the other responses: the abstract basically says the researchers isolated something from one sick patient by:

        extracting some tissue from a sick patient.
        Question? What did they extract? They extracted something from someone who was sick, but they did not ISOLATE anything to determine what in the extraction was making the person sick.

        Hope that helps.


        AK in VT

      • Donald says:

        “We extracted viral RNA from the supernatant and confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by using a diagnostic quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 2, panel C). We also confirmed the presence of coronavirus-like particles in infected Vero E6 cells by electron microscopy”

        Which begs the question…

        – Confirmed SARS compared to what?
        What can it be compared too if there is no previous SARS coronavirus? More cycles of PCR testing?

        – Cornavirus like particles?
        Exosome like particles but once again compared to what?

        Its a problem of axiom. Comparing something to a truth you’ve accepted as a truth but that truth has never been proven.
        A cyclical postion that is running this show called proof.

      • A LIttle Help says:

        How would they know that they had isolated that which they have never before isolated?

        The postulates are to be taken as a whole. All of them must be performed in the order that Koch originally laid out. Taken together they form a picture of causality.

        One must isolate and purify, AND ONLY THEN TEST on animal populations.

        SHort of doing this, each postulate is simply meaningless and inane.

      • Michael Freed says:

        Well, I guess the CDC contradicting itself means we should trust them. YIPPEE!!
        Ummm… on which thing they said though: that they HAVE isolated it, or that they have not?
        Well, either way, I’m glad to no longer have to think about anything, someone provided contradictory proofs as opposed to incontrovertible ones, so I’m free to choose which I like & assume that’s the right one. U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

      • CovFeFe Revealed??? says:

        So, do these “scientists” think proving something is a soup is equal to “isolating” that something from the contents of the soup?

        It is amazing how dishonest the need for a paycheck can make a psyentist…

        “We isolated SARS-CoV-2 from 2 patients with COVID-19 and determined the genomic sequence of each isolate (SARS-CoV-2/SB2 and SARS-CoV-2/SB3-TYAGNC). In addition, we studied the replication kinetics of SARS-CoV-2/SB3-TYAGNC in human fibroblast, epithelial, and immune cells.”

        “We extracted viral RNA from the supernatant and confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 by using a diagnostic quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 2, panel C). We also confirmed the presence of coronavirus-like particles in infected Vero E6 cells by electron microscopy”

        “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.
        Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
        ~Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address

      • CovFeFe Revealed??? says:

        Define “isolate.” Per the quotes in a previous comment, apparently the “scientists” think “isolate” is to prove something is in a bunch of other stuff. It really means to take that something and remove absolutely everything else from around it.

        “Keys” in a grocery bag is not isolated from the contents of the grocery bag when you look in and see the keys. Rather, the keys are isolated from the contents of the grocery bag when the keys are removed from the bag.
        Now, I can look at the keys and say I’ve isolated them, just like I can put toxic aluminum into a “vaccine safety test” solution and call it a “placebo,” BUT I’D BE LYING, WOULDN’T I?

        What did they actually do?

        Are they lying like they lie about vaccine study placebos?

      • Yeah, I cited that article, and someone quickly pointed out that what was collected and placed in a repository was from ONE patient.

        Read the article again — just the abstract — it refers to ONE PATIENT. Is that really enough to claim isolation of one causative agent? — I’m thinking NO.

      • Padriagin Eagle says:

        Nice try, Melissa. But no cigar.

      • Cecilia says:

        I understand that the process they followed to isolate the virus was flawed. They eliminated some important steps from the isolation process which made it invalid. I wish I could find the info, which I heard from a Jewish scientist’s interview about that time.

      • Ayrial says:

        “In the abstract”??

    • Charles says:

      So what is the reason why hospitals around the world are overcrowded and dying en masse? Colds and flu don’t do that.

  3. Shamal says:

    Hi Jon…I am on your side. BUT THERE’S something strange going on. Here’s an article by the CDC..
    The opening statement goes like this…”SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community. One important way that CDC has supported global efforts to study and learn about SARS-CoV-2 in the laboratory was by growing the virus in cell culture and ensuring that it was widely available. Researchers in the scientific and medical community can use virus obtained from this work in their studies.”
    Can you research this and give your comments PLEASE. Thank you.

    • Misha says:

      They called isolation when they put a sample of the patient in a cell line , in vitro , and add antibiotics ( to kill if any bacteria ) and grow factors and chemicals to stimulate those cells , and make them produce RNA and then that RNA goes to other cell and possible die. There they say something in the sample contains the virus, so we start to play on the molecular level with antibodies and PCR . Maybe some picture from that culture will be taken , that shows a cell with an exsosome or cellular debris . But never ISOLATE from the pure sample, because… because.. they cant.
      They cannot isolate, they dont isolate – they only use the word isolate. but the trick is they do the process in the culture, poisoning the cells, NEVER AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF PURIFIED VIRUS FROM PURE SAMPLE ! One thing is isolate ( what they now call when they produce a cell to die in vitro culture cells ) another thing is PURIFIED ( when you can characterize a “virus” without anything else but “viruses” in there )
      If you dont purify the sample , then you are making bad science. You cannot jump into molecular level if you dont know what proteins you have that are only from “theeee virussss”, and that you have a real virus. If you believe in the existance of the contagious virus of course .

      • bleak says:

        I think it all comes down to the Koch Postulates which were never fulfilled or satisfied. Postulate #2 ‘The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.’ ie filtered from all the other chaff.

        Dr Kaufman explained this to me so well in his Rooster video which youtube took down more than once. I find that glaring because they seemed to have singled out that video which is a giveaway 😉

        Fortunately, some poor tinfoil wingnut whac job put it up on bitchute.

      • scott macneilage says:

        Misha has it right. See my post above with a presentation from Kary Mullis the inventor of PCR. Pay close attention to his apple analogy if you want to understand what is going on here. These proteins from RNA can be from many different sources. It is the most outrageous fraud to claim they have a virus when what they have cannot be verified or even shown to cause sickness.

      • A Little Help says:

        The postulates must ALL be performed in teh order in which Koch originally laid out. One cannot isolate and then further isolate, and then test and then purify.

        The order that Koch dicovered was and is most crucial.

        • CovFeFe Revealed??? says:

          From what I’m hearing, nobody has taken Koch’s postulates seriously for quite a few decades!

          They don’t tell us why they are occulting this information, we just know they are.

          One reason might well be that they know darn well that an isolated virus WILL NOT MAKE EVERYONE SICK WHO IS GIVEN THE VIRUS. The obvious question is, why?

          Oh, chit… ANTOINE BECHAMP WAS RIGHT!

          Take your toxic brew vaccine and shove it, my immune system (terrain) is fine.

    • Piksil says:


      3 June 2005
      I look at the link, then looked at the embedded link on how they cultured the virus.
      I think it’s a great “how to guide” for those that believe that Pasteur wasn’t a fraud, didn’t fudge results (or more accurately LIE about his results to the public but not in his lab notes), and Germ Theory is the gospel.

      It’s nice that they reference all the companies responsible for the equipment and testing methods used to grow this virus. (List of accomplices?)

      And I think that it is suspect this was supposedly published in June 2020, but is just now appearing. (Probably Russian hackers kept it from appearing sooner.) As you can see, the date of this reply is June 3, 2005. It’s right there at the top. George Floyd and I have been working on this response for several weeks. He and I are working on several responses to people who question the settled science.

      It may be their biggest, but it’s not the CDC’s first rodeo.
      They’re a quasi-military operation.

      I’m on Jon’s side too. Thanks for the link!

    • Mos Craciun says:

      @Shamal . If you look at timeline ( at the bottom of the page)first they got only ONE specimen from only ONE patient which they CLAIM that they KNOW is infected with novel virus. How on earth did they KNOW that the man is infected with the novel virus before isolation and purification ?!?

      I can cough twice , then you DECIDE I am sick with covid-21 , take a sample from me , find some RNA fragments and then “discover” …guess what ? n-SARS Corona-21 !!! And you can make big money in grants from this “discovery” , based on ONE SAMPLE from ONE man . And they call it science ! Geeez ..

    • A Little Help says:

      Lab technicians can and do use many things. But it will only mean what their bias will have it mean.

      Koch’s postulates must ALL be performed in the order that he set forth in his original work.

    • za ka lu says:

      viruses are NOT contagious

  4. Piksil says:

    “If a mechanic says he has a piece of a fender from a car that has never been seen before;”

    They don’t even have a fender.

    Just some metal, and say it’s a fender. And say it’s a fender from a car.

    But that metal could be from a radiator, a seat frame, window frame, etc.

    And it could be from a motorcycle, bicycle, or a wheel chair.

    Dr Kaufman explained in one of his early videos that the ‘viral fragments’ that were supposedly used to identify this ‘novel coronavirus’ were sequenced with a lower probability than the probability of monkey DNA matching human DNA.
    It might be from a primate.

    It might be a fender.

  5. Paul says:

    “The test to detect a virus that isn’t there.

    This would be on the order of

    NASA issuing a guide for navigating a fleet of ships to a planet whose existence has not been established—and the population of the whole world is going to board those ships for the voyage.”

    Now that’s Good Good Good Jon!



    The ACTUAL lock down & resultant economic destruction is no entertaining matter.


    “The truth is only bitter for those who are hiding it.”

    WOW… That’s sweet.

    Nice Work, as usual!

    I once had a long conversation with a “reformed” salesman.
    He was a salesman for many years.
    He was changing careers b/c he was suffering intense guilt over years of “tricking people to buy stuff” (this was his description of himself).
    He told me the “greatest charge” he’d get “was selling something, to someone, who DIDN’T need it.”

  6. Rhonda Piccola says:

    Thanks Jon, I am educated, and fortified by your decades of ongoing research. I enjoy forwarding and sharing your news to many health research outlets. Much Gratitude.

  7. Kevin says:

    And yet we get these daily breathless news reports coming about about “the virus.” Today’s was “the virus can live on human skin for 8 hours!”…which is to confirm the “use hand sanitizer” nonsense they have been pushing since the beginning.

    I’ve been saying for months that the “hand santizer” thing is unverified nonsense. Who can say it works? Hand sanitizer does NOT work against Norovirus, you need chlorine to break that virus down not alcohol. I’ve seen no studies showing that alcohol-based sanitizers break down “corona” virus, just lots of assumptions. Once again, all based on “we detected genetic wreckage”…leading right back to the PCR test.

    Remember when the “chinese ghostbusters” were on the nightly news using bug foggers all over Wuhan? No one would say what they were actually spraying. Clearly not chlorine gas since no one was gagging for breath.

  8. Truth1 says:

    Well Jon, this is a perfect example of human nature. without facts, logic, or reason they will go along with pretending something that does not exist in reality, is welcomed into their minds so that they can fit in and not rock the boat or upset the applecart. we are all infants developmentally speaking. In fact, we are not even out of the womb yet. but lets look in the bright side instead of the right side. We can all know reach out to Santa Claus and the Easter bunny and welcome them in to our inclusive community of friends that we do not want to offend.

    Human nature has a weak spot. It can not bear to admit reality if there is ever the slightest chance it might offend one person. I remember about 89 or 90 at LLBean where I worked, that no longer would we in the warehouse tell an off color joke or a corner of the break room at a table with our friends, with the quietest voice, we could instantly be complained about, even though we were not aiming any thing at them. it was still harassment. the real problem with this policy, which is nation wide if nor world wide, bans free speech. speech becomes subjective. there is no objective standard. In this way some groups, all protected ones, of course have special and superior rights to the rest of us, the male species. So now we have special classes of people who are far more entitled then the rest of us (men). Men have no bill of rights. We are just dogs and rats.
    I am not making this up and you know it all too well. We gave all men an elevated broadened “circumcision in the mouth and in rights and dignity. We are now a hated class, legally! but not morally. So now we have many varying levels of privilege for nearly anyone except a male white hetero Christian. so if this is what equality is, then I am against equality. It looks more like like bigotry and hate crimes toward a vulnerable unprotected class, White men. so the rest of you, check your privilege and be inclusive or I am going to tell the thought police on you.

    So Jon, look how logic and sanity can be wiped out in a moments time, because humans fear to disagree with anything. Who wants to be a pariah? Its just you and I and a handful of people here at Logic Central . . . until the thought police get wind of this and then you will have shut down, involuntarily for committing the worst crime imaginable, dare I say it . . . Oh what the hell, I might as well say it. What it left to lose any way. You allowed free speech. we may never hear from you again.

    • Melissa Native says:


    • Michael Freed says:

      Human nature, eh?You’re in my wheelhouse now, buddy. Remember how when you’re a teen, despite the counsel of EVERY ADULT IN EXISTENCE you worried more about what your peers thought of you than you should? Yeah, the part of your brain that becomes concerned about your place within the group either grows in then or just suddenly becomes active. But it doesn’t come with an instruction manual on how to DEAL with the new things coursing through it.
      Why do parents never seem to remember how THEY were at this age? Because these things shift around in parts of the brain I refer collectively as the Subconscious (SC). As opposed to one’s Conscious Mind as what Jon uses to do his research (CM).
      We waste all our lives trying to apply CM rules to SC impulses, never understanding them.
      As adults, if our CMs were in charge, we could sue corporations for industrial polluting despite government. Citizens United made this easier, by declaring corporations are legally people. Since it is CLEARLY ILLEGAL for people to pollute others or the environment, then we can sue all polluting corporations, and their accomplices in these crimes: corporate managers, CEOs, anyone involved in the decisions to pollute. Everyone involved.
      The SC says “that includes THESE people and says “but Daddy-Government would never allow any harm to come to me” and the CM is totally undermined.
      We’ll be here for another thousand years or so because most, if not all citizens of Western society back down in the face of their infantile SC fears of life without their surrogate father-figure’s imaginary protection.

  9. Misha says:

    Jon, one thing :

    We are downloading documents and videos since this sad hoax began. All this will be lost and forget if people dont save all info for future generations.

    Thats what happened with Aids , now young people are still learning fraud science in school Incredible.
    If someone ask me to give a reference to try to understand this psicological war, I forward to your site.
    You are one of the only that keep asking and researching and go back to your common sense ( and experience in following this medical scams that are so identical one from each other! ).
    Its so so difficult to mantain a strong mind in this overflow of stupidity information of MSM that I have no words only but THANKS .
    Thanks for helping people to keep foot on earth.
    A task that seems every time coming more and more difficult.

    P.D. For those that insist like a parrot on virus from labs , and bioweapons.. dont you realize that if such thing as a lab virus that some lab spread exist, they can show the world EM of that monster to avoid all questioning ????? Yes there are labs, but they work on vaccines, there will be the “poison” . There is no virus there is no contagious.
    Of course if a group of people breath the same toxic air, or a group of people try some rare flu vaccine will some of them result ill at the same time, respiratory illness by the way.

    Also please people note that only videos not banned are the ones that includes the “virus scape from lab ” .

    What they do is give you 2 ways of thinking :
    You believe in a natural fucking virus pandemia or you believe that the virus was release from a lab
    Dont you think that you end in the same problem1 or 2 / reaction/ solution SCAM ??

    Dont you realize that the objective of this psicological war is achieve in both thinking possibilities that they give to you ?
    Stop with viruses. They dont exist, you produce your particles and you do that to cure yourself and to get rid of real chemical poisons.
    Nothing comes from outside ( only chemtrails, poison watter, poisoned food, and vaccines ingredientes)
    Not viruses! , come on . I know is difficult, bit use your mind and your heart dont repeat and do what most people do without questioning. How a word can turn an idea into a control of people is unvelibable .


    I know is difficult. But, stop and see the real things with your intuition, and take out the ones that are mind created that does NOT exist.
    Dont exist.
    Dont exist
    Dont exist

    • Cat says:

      I realized – even – I was holding my breath while reading your opinion. Very well put and I respect your point-of-view.

    • za ka lu says:

      “If I could live my life over again, I would devote
      it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat,
      diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of
      the diseased tissue.”
      – Rudolph Virchow

      “Nothing is lost, nothing is created … all is
      transformed. Nothing is the prey of death.
      All is the prey of life.”
      – Antoine Béchamp

      “The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of
      weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule
      in the medical profession. There are no specific
      diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”
      – Florence Nightingale

    • Mila says:

      Misha, I agree, but steel I wonder how children get measles when they hang out for 1 hour, what about herpes, syphilis?

  10. Mary says:

    Thank you Jon for all your work. I am still stunned by all of this. If wearing one down is their intent, well I am there. I am not a medical “professional,” but even I can understand what isolation means.the entire medical community should be up in arms. I tell people it is not isolated, usually no one even wants to know what that means???? I get that blank stare. Jon, maybe you should write about that blank stare, lol with your wit an humor it would be a great article. In my experience Traitor Joe`s is top on hiring rude insulting people to demand you put on a mask, but the smaller business’s, are rude also.Some young people standing there like commandos. I left my grandsons cup in a small bakery, the little girl came out to give it to me, the cup completely wrapped in tissue paper, handing it to me at a distance, as I had walked out of bakery and did not have a mask on, she actually looked scared. Its mind blowing. During the Vietnam fiasco, I again, was only one in family,who vocally spoke out, that has lead me to this conclusion that some are just born knowing this is all a deceitful place, why,idk. I am so perplexed, with all coming out, most just continue ignorant.But my feeling of waiting for the axe to fall is great, I am very apprehensive. And what is up with Trump getting this? How very odd.

    • Donna says:

      Mary, Pres. Trump tested positive. That doesn’t mean he got the virus. Did you see the video that Trump released at the end of his stay? He seems to recognize that the people are gripped with fear, thanks to MSM and politicians. The Democrats are propagating that fear. Donald Trump tried to reassure the people that covid should not be feared. He is 74 and is in the category of people who would be susceptible to the worse effects of covid; but, he didn’t die.

      I think his message was to encourage the people to let go of the fear. There are more people out there who are afraid of covid than there are those who are not afraid.

    • Eluard says:

      Mary, you and I are very simpatico. It’s funny, I too have these weird encounters at Traitor Joe’s as you call them, the staff is particularly militant and almost frenzied in their mask fervor. What a stupid hassles it all is. Mind control everywhere you go. I think you’re right about some people being born to see through the deception; why do I have only one friend who can really see it, who is WILLING to see it and acknowledge it? Now you’re a grandmother thinking about your grandkids growing up in this world. Not easy. As far as Trump, who knows how he got tested, what the cycles of the PCR were, etc. He may not have even tested positive, it could have been a political strategy. Mary, I try to maintain my connection to the Spirit. Meditation. And let go of any particular outcomes. The fact that we can see the truth is, in a way, somewhat of a consolation. Wishing you the best.

      • John says:

        Mary & Eduard, It may be of interest to check out the info freely available at
        Many are finding help there for effectively dealing with businesses who promote Masskhysteria while trampling on your rights.
        When will it be a better time to learn to assert ones rights and get well acquainted with doing that prior to the covid vaccine scam?

    • Larry C says:

      “I am not a medical “professional,” but even I can understand what isolation means.the entire medical community should be up in arms. I tell people it is not isolated, usually no one even wants to know what that means????”

      I think you’re right, Mary. With the never-ending lock-downs – and the Accelerated Devastation of the Nation’s Economy – it’s only a matter of time before even very large hospitals go bankrupt and the vast majority of physicians are out of work.

      At this late date, I too am baffled that more physicians are not sounding the alarm…if only out of self preservation…

  11. Monet says:

    I’ve been following you on this since March. I appreciate all you have exposed. I see this as THE biggest psychological operation in history. Yet I’m still trying to fit this view with what Judy Mikovits (Plandemic and Plague of Corruption) and the Chinese whistleblower have put out.

  12. Rothwarrockrich says:

    It’s worse than a international medical fraud. We don’t live in a system of law. If we did, the courts would have taken care of this long ago. Unless the actions can be rendered null and void by the courts, the only option is physical revolt. There is no running away from this.

  13. Casey says:

    Fantastic. This is what a few of us have been saying while others are caught up in the ‘virus was made in a lab’ charade.

    Now, PLEASE – You have to take the next step and realize this goes for ANY ‘virus’. Seriously. The entire notion of ‘infectious viruses’ is based on fraud.

  14. ken says:

    That’s it Jon

    Attack the test! No virus isolated then no test is valid.

    Attack the Vaccine! No virus isolated then no vaccine can be made.

  15. Paul R says:


    Many of the Fraud Section’s cases are suits filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 – 3733, a federal statute originally enacted in 1863 in response to defense contractor fraud during the American Civil War.

    The FCA provided that any person who knowingly submitted false claims to the government was liable for double the government’s damages plus a penalty of $2,000 for each false claim. The FCA has been amended several times and now provides that violators are liable for treble damages plus a penalty that is linked to inflation.

    In addition to allowing the United States to pursue perpetrators of fraud on its own, the FCA allows private citizens to file suits on behalf of the government (called “qui tam” suits) against those who have defrauded the government. Private citizens who successfully bring qui tam actions may receive a portion of the government’s recovery. Many Fraud Section investigations and lawsuits arise from such qui tam actions.

    The Department of Justice obtained more than $3 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and false claims against the government in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2019. More information about those recoveries can be found here and the 2018 FCA statistics can be found here.

    • Piksil says:

      Paul R:

      So, we’ve had how many ‘cases’ of ‘covid’?

      And how many ‘covid’ deaths?

      That ain’t chump change.

      But, I guess that they would be suing themselves.

  16. Mark L says:

    “Cooper continually says that his decisions are based on “science, facts and data,” but two different judges in two different court cases have asked for the science, facts and data behind Cooper’s decisions and neither judge found the science, facts and data presented by the state convincing.”
    “Federal District Court Judge James Dever, in the lawsuit claiming that Cooper closing churches and houses of worship violated their First Amendment rights, made fun of Cooper’s lack of science, facts and data in his decision ¬– or made fun of Cooper as much as a federal judge can in a legal document.”

    “Wake County Superior Court Judge James Gale, in the lawsuit over bowling alleys, was not quite so harsh in his ruling that opened bowling alleys, but he also decried the lack of science, facts and data to support taking away people’s livelihoods in one business and not in similar businesses.”

    “Both judges ruled against Cooper, in a large part because while the plaintiffs had science, facts and data to support their cases, the state didn’t produce much to support its case.”

    “Wake County Judge Gale was particularly critical of the deposition by Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Dr. Mandy Cohen, who recited a bunch of figures, but didn’t offer science, facts and data about why bowling alleys in particular should remain closed or why the reopening plan offered by bowling alleys would not provide sufficient protection for the population.”

    • edward donegan says:

      it’s a head cold!

      Per the CDC, as of Oct 1st 2020 y-o-y total medical deaths are down 2%. I’m simply reporting the CDC numbers.

  17. DL says:

    Here is an amazing YouTube summarizing/connecting the dots and ending in legal steps that are in the works. They will help other lawyers too! I believe at minute 21 it is explained where the lil snippet of RNA came from, ha ha, to develop these faulty PCR tests on which the whole world banked to making their insane policies/orders/mandates/lockdowns, etc. Since when have we EVER made theses huge sorts of decisions based on ONE lab test?!?!?!

  18. From Elsewhere says:

    People are isolated, fined, prosecuted and locked down for any gesture out of “Their order of masks”.
    Fear is building into fury.

  19. Sam A. says:

    The Elements of Fraud

    For an allegation of criminal fraud to be proven at law, the following elements must be in place:

    1. Party A knowingly relies upon dishonest statements for the purposes of procuring material gain.
    2. Party B is caused to rely upon those dishonest statements by the actions of Party A.
    3. Party B [and Party C, D, E etc, whenever appropriate] suffers losses [or might have suffered them] as a direct result of relying on the dishonest statements of Party A.
    4. Party A becomes guilty of committing fraud the moment they obtain material gain from relying upon their dishonest statements, whether Parties B and C suffered losses or not.

    18 U.S. Code § 1040. Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits:

    (a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (b) of this section, knowingly—

    (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device any material fact; or

    (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, in any matter involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with a major disaster or emergency declaration under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) or an emergency declaration under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191), or in connection with any procurement of property or services related to any emergency or major disaster declaration as a prime contractor with the United States or as a subcontractor or supplier on a contract in which there is a prime contract with the United States, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

    (b) A circumstance described in this subsection is any instance where—

    (1) the authorization, transportation, transmission, transfer, disbursement, or payment of the benefit is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce;
    (2) the benefit is transported in the mail at any point in the authorization, transportation, transmission, transfer, disbursement, or payment of that benefit; or
    (3) the benefit is a record, voucher, payment, money, or thing of value of the United States, or of any department or agency thereof.

    (c) In this section, the term “benefit” means any record, voucher, payment, money or thing of value, good, service, right, or privilege provided by the United States, a State or local government, or other entity.,%2410%20billion%20each%2C%20we%20estimate.

    “Many of the companies with the most lucrative federal government contracts are apparel manufacturers, like HanesBrands. These companies are mass-producing products such as face masks and gloves that federal departments like Homeland Security and Health and Human Services are buying up in bulk. Products like these can help contain the spread of COVID-19, and are also selling rapidly to private households and individuals. Here is a list of what Americans bought to prepare for the epidemic.”

    • za ka lu says:

      and to add the per mentioned in article ‘consent’—

      there is NO VALID CONSENT to ANY of the SYSTEM what-so-ever—

  20. Ben F says:

    Boston, Massachusetts: Base of the entire Global Business Operation / Global PR Campaign

    Read these tow PPT

    See 61

    See Slide 22

    Now Read This. What does this tell you?

    “In March, a Biogen corporate meeting in Boston is thought to have been linked to 20,000 Covid-19 cases, according to a study published to the preprint server medRxiv that has yet to be peer-reviewed.”,city%20by%20the%20local%20militiamen.

  21. Pete says:

    Anyone who is interested in a complete discussion of whether or not the virus has been isolated, please check out the recently published book, “The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including ‘Coronavirus’) Are Not the Cause of Disease”, by Thomas Cowan MD and co-author Sally Fallon Morell.

    In very clear language, they demonstrate that none of the main studies usually referenced has isolated the COVID virus. Nor has anyone else isolated the virus.
    Further, they demonstrate that no one has ever proved that viruses cause disease. This historical point is very important.
    They also discuss many other aspects of this topic.

    The book is available as an e-book from Barnes and Noble:

    and in hardcover from the Dr. Cowan’s website:

  22. ThomasJ says:


    See Most Recent CASE DOCUMENT

    October 6, 2020 | Supplemental Notice of Pertinent and Significant Authorities

    “The governor’s taken control and he’s turned the government upside down,” DeGrandis told six justices Friday.”

    “Baker no longer presides over an administration. He’s running a cult. Numbers don’t matter, you just have to believe, conform, comply, drink the Kool-Aid — or else!”

    • A Little Help says:

      This has happened before in human history. The Salem Witch Trials. Fighting the invisible enemy. The taint. A good name or a bad name. Public trials. The science of panic.

      Man desires to freedom, but he fears it as well. He will accept any belief that reassures him of his place in the mass mind.

  23. D. Smith says:

    Donna and Mary, how can someone test “positive” with a test that doesn’t exist for a VIRUS that doesn’t exist??? Did you actually read Jon’s article?

    President Trump is, I believe strongly, setting the stage for the “common man” to believe in drugs and vaccines. He’s probably getting funding from the manufacturers (I put this as nicely as I could because even though I don’t like what’s happening or what I’m thinking, I’m still a Trump fan more than a Biden fan, and that’s a fact). But no one should be subjected to taking drugs or vaccines for an “unknown”. And, most certainly, no one should ever be FORCED to do so.

  24. mumbley joe says:

    One should review DARPA’s Prophecy program.

    DARPA, a DOD Agency, has been quite active in the covidiocy narrative, and is a longtime close partner of Big Tech, has, since at least 2010, been seeking a predictive mechanism for possible emerging viruses.

    In other words, they want to treat viruses before they exist, based on predictive modeling.

    Consider that rather weird goal.

  25. Charlie says:

    If we had some lobster we could have steak and lobster, but we don’t have any steak!

  26. sam quentin says:

    Well thank goodness only one of our presidential candidates is foolish/corrupt enough to promulgate this covidiocy nonsense.

    Oh wait, that’s right.
    Both are bowing to the exact same elite, neo-feudal Lords.

  27. BDBinc says:

    A timely article Jon as they ignore the primary crumbled foundations of the hoax( the non existence of ” a new virus” and proof that it that causes a ” new disease”). The controlled opposition want to only debate “face masks and unlawful lockups”

    “How to make up your own ” novel virus” using computer programs just like the WHO did. Please note this “virus” (string of rna) is not actual or real its CG. And WHOs afraid of a CG virus? Unfortunately almost everyone when they believe its real, people are afraid of media propaganda .
    So once you have taken the sample of animal DNA( fetal bovine), human DNA, other contaminants and very delicate rna you mix it up together and just let computers make up a virtual virus….”

  28. George W says:

    ATOMIC BOMBSHELL: No proof for the RNA being of viral origin

    Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.

    As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.

    The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

    Because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

    Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

    But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

    We asked several study authors “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses:

    Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health,” Nature Medicine, March 2020

    Replying Author: Malik Peiris

    Date: May 12, 2020

    Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

    Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020

    Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han

    Date: May 6, 2020

    Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

    Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020

    Replying Author: Wan Beom Park

    Date: March 19, 2020

    Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

    Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China,” 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020

    Replying Author: Wenjie Tan

    Date: March 18, 2020

    Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

    Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from.

    • A Little Help says:

      Isolation and prufication will tell you only that you have something. The other postulates must be performed, as well. One must test on animal populations.

  29. Alessandro says:

    OK, for months I’ve been telling people about the alleged virus called CV19. I tell them about Koch’s postulates and the lack of a pass. I say “show me a picture of CV19 and I will believe it, not exosomes but the virus”. Then folk say to me “if the virus doesn’t exist why are so many getting sick?”

    How are you, Jon’s readers answering this question?

    • Eluard says:


      Go back and read Jon’s articles through March, April, May, even going back to January.

      I’ve linked a bunch below from January through March. Please read and share them. Jon’s been blowing craters through this thing since January. But you need, unfortunately (?) a sharp mind to GET what he’s saying, which is not exactly the entire world population. Here’s a quote from the first linked article below:

      “What I’m pointing to in this article is very serious mind control. Most people refuse to shake it off. They might say, “Interesting article. I see what you’re saying. So tell me, if the coronavirus isn’t the cause of the epidemic, what is IT?”

    • Piksil says:


      People get sick all the time. People die all the time, too. Have been doing so as long as I’ve been alive, and even before then, I’m told.

      Dis-ease is brought on by toxins. Poisons to the body. (A small percentage of dis-ease is thought to be ‘genetic’, I’ve heard 5%. One should wonder what has caused genetic mutations to be passed down…..toxins?)

      Traumatic injury should be added into the equation as well. I would imagine there are figures available estimating traumatic injuries and deaths.

      I would ask those people who say “so many” are getting sick, is that number higher than average? What are their sources for that information, MSM? Are they referring to the reported numbers of ‘positive cases’ as being ‘sick’? What are or were their symptoms? Do these many sick have a prior history of illness or illnesses?

      ‘It’s a virus’ has been the cover story for dis-ease causing toxins/pollution for too long, in large part thanks to Germ Theory.

      It’s time to come clean, and not by using hand sanitizer, wearing a mask, and social distancing.

      • Alessandro says:

        Thank you for your response. I agree with all you say. I usually say that until this alleged virus came along all these deaths were happening before its just that the media were not spruking them, then I talk about excess deaths numbers which seem hard to find.

        • Piksil says:


          For excess death numbers, Dr Carrie Madej, D.O. did a video a few months back reporting all-cause deaths for Feb-Apr or Mar-May.

          Anyway, I’m not sure if YouTube has removed it or not.

          Oh, and the numbers were lower than the average for the months reported.

  30. Jon:

    Nice detective work on this.

    I did some research on what they used to “mimic” Covid 19:

    “N gene” is the Sars Cov 1 virus, which if you’ll recall was commonly referred to as “SARS” back in 2003 (for which herd immunity has likely occurred -causing antibodies in a vast amount of the world’s population, which of course would ensure positives in such vast number). SARS is different from the alleged “novel” Covid 19 (which is termed “Sars Cov 2”). Also “GenBank accession: MN908947.2” is isolate from the “Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus isolate Wuhan-Hu-1,” not “Covid 19.”

    So the CDC placed these two non-Covid 19 viruses along with human lung cells (A549 cells) into a petri dish with a liquid. They then applied this PCR test to this mixture to see if it would detect this (either the 2003 SARS virus or Wuhan-Hu-1 pneumonia virus or both). Apparently it does detect one or both of these non-Covid 19 viruses. They then jump to the conclusion that a PCR positive proves that you have this phantom Covid 19 virus, and of course, it therefore proves the existence of Covid 19.

  31. Lea says:

    Thank you Jon.
    I feel that Fauci and his followers, Most likely those with large investments in big pharma stocks, are those with Munchausen Disease by Proxi but greed also.
    Those U.S. cities and mayors who denied an help from Trump are most probably waiting until the moronic public burns down , loots their own cities until the real estate can be purchased by them at the lowest price so they can make as much cash as possible.
    Here in Toronto, Ontario Canada, there have been 6 condos built with another 6 or more scheduled to be built within a 3 block radius.
    It is obvious that there is no killer virus happening and folks are still running, cycling with masks on.
    I have never worn one inside any indoor shopping centre /bank etc. and never will.
    Luckily, in Ontario Canada, it is a by-law wherein people can decide not to mask due to medical reasons where proof of a medical condition is not required by anyone or for those who require accommodation under the Ontario Human Rights Code.
    Still, masked or un masked folks would rather walkk into the street, (social distancing), than go near another human.
    I can’t wait until the court system finds this Corona fraud one of the biggest human rights offences in history.
    I’d die before anyone forcibly made me wear a mask 24/7 and/or inject me.
    THank you so much Jon for your great observations and writing.

  32. Pft says:

    This says they have isolated the virus. I am not sure virus can be purified like bacteria because its much smaller

    Kochs postulate was developed for bacteria. Viruses were unknown then. Bacteria are large enough to be filtered. Its easily cultured. Viruses are difficult to culture as they only grow after infecting cells and the cells must be kept alive to produce a lot of virus.

    In order to evaluate a test one must have samples which are known to have the live virus. I notice in the link above they did 20-22 PCR cycles to confirm virus in cultures before isolation. This jibes with a study I read that if you needed more than 24 cycles then you weren’t finding infectious virus but only pieces of dead virus or something else

    I believe there is a virus. I think its endemic. Its not anymore harmful than cold/flu. 90% of cases are not COVID. They are simply positive tests due to way too many PCR cycles 35-45 intended to boost positive tests to sell more tests and vaccines and destroy the society/economy

    Why would they do that? So they can “Build Back Better” as part of the 4th Industrial Revolution that will implement Agenda 2030 by Technocratic Control using IoT (things) and IoB (bodies) and 5G that will dictate every aspect of life for each individual. The religion will be Communitarianism where the Common Good is the law and there is no individual rights or freedoms.

    Unstructured Global Governance will/ control national, state, city and community government as well as individuals using Central Governments Digital Currency that will be limited to those who meet performance quotas. Everything will be measured, even sewage. Those not in compliance lose access to Digital Currency or have it reduced.

    • glenn says:

      The problem lies in that process of culturing viruses. It is a manipulated practice by the labs with the assumption that the particle is a virus at the beginning.

      The infection of cells to reproduce the virus is not straightforward or immediate. Scientists would use various technologies and chemicals in order to produce an infection with no consideration that this particle cannot infect.

      Even when cultured the RNA sequence in these supposed viruses are incomplete. So it is rebuilt with the assumption that the sequence must have the structure of a virus. And we cannot argue against it because “we know the genomic structure”. All genomic sequences are gospel despite the fact that much of them are completed with computer modeling.

      I’m not saying viruses don’t exists but our understanding of them is theoretical. The vast public are under the assumption that viruses are observed in it’s entirety with no guess work whatsoever. And that is not true or even possible.

  33. JJINTB says:

    I’m not doubting anything, not trolling, but there are other CDC docs stating it was isolated

    “SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.”

    then the methods were in another CDC doc

    “Cell Culture, Limiting Dilution, and Virus Isolation

    We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage. We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%) and antibiotics/antimycotics (GIBCO, https://www.thermofisher.comExternal Link). We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL. We added 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols (9,10).

    When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip. We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”

    So how can these CDC docs be reconciled with the one saying that Sars 2 has no quantified isolate ???

    • Mos Craciun says:

      As I can see , you read these 2 docs with great attention . Can you tell me, please :

      1) from how many “sick” people did they collect samples ? More than one ?

      2) how many samples were colected ? More than one ?

      3) how many authors ( top experts ) worked for the document you mentioned ? Less than 34 ?

      Thank you

    • za ka lu says:

      liars lie

    • paranoid goy says:

      Them are some big words in that there quotation you supply us with, no doubt. In normal Inglesh, the paragraph starts with
      “We took a whole bunch of (typically cancerous) cells genberally used to “grow viruses in”. Then we mixed in some snot. This all we mixed with some commercial preparations used to keep cells alive and metabolising in some manner. Then we mixed in a variety of other microbes, cells and body fluids. We baked this in a very fancy oven for a while until we saw the cells change in some undefined manner, , and we found some scraps of organic matter, and cut that to bits with a chemical solution, then we used a test procedure on it that we used before on some other viruses we think relevant and similar.”
      Your story ends there, so I cannot translate how the fantasy comes to conclusion. I see no mention as to what they actually found when they analysed that mystic sediment, or even how exactly it was analysed.

  34. George W says:

    “That is to say, if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral.

    [In this context, it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “isolation” in their papers, but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, in this context the term “isolation” is misused.]

    Thus, the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.

    We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea… to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

    [Modern virus detection methods like] “sleek polymerase chain reaction… tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint..” [3]

    And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:

    “I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.” [4]

    This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2.”

  35. Mark says:

    Has any virus been isolated?

    • Eluard says:


      I’m not an expert but if I remember correctly Dr. Kaufman in one of his interviews pretty much implied that no, no virus has actually been shown, through Koch’s Postulates–or even Rivers Criteria–to have been isolated.

      And Stefan Lanka won a court case in Germany against someone who thought they won the wager that Lanka had offered — to prove that measles had been isolated. Nope, no cigar. Does this tell us that Kaufman and Cowan and their terrain theory predecessors are correct that viruses are not “getting us sick” but actually helping? And really might only be parts of cells like exosomes that split off to defend and alert?

    • A LIttle Help says:


      This has been stated in all the relelvant research for the past ten months.

  36. kadak says:

    Lots of comments, so apologies if this has already been cited.

    From Australia, 20 June 20202:

    Testing the PCR tests.

    They only used lab created viruses.

    page 4:

    “The study employed a 271 sample validation panel comprising 156 positive and 115 negative samples, randomly assembled. These were of necessity **simulated samples**, using inactivated cell-culture-grown SARS-CoV-2, and other respiratory viruses spiked into a representative variety of fluids, since **patient samples were not available in sufficient volumes** to parallel test in three laboratories.”

    I thought at the time – wtf!!

  37. John T says:

    The internet is literally swarming with articles describing virologists having covid isolates, and full genetic profiling as well.
    You based an entire article based upon your absurd and laughable misinterpretation of a line in one document which describes that they did not have a full isolate ON HAND for testing, they only had RNA.
    Your family must go crazy with your inane ramblings at home, unless you’ve scared them all off by now.

    • Eluard says:

      John T,

      The internet can “swarm” with whatever it wants. See Dr. Kaufman’s Rooster In the River Of Rats video:

      He talks at 30:24 very briefly about the Canadian McMaster group; he hardly bothers giving much time to them because at that time, in March–same time your linked article was published–they hadn’t put out any real paper showing their studies. Whatever they had put out had nothing to do with PROPER scientific procedures for purifying and isolating viruses.

      Again, they can SAY whatever they want and most people will buy it. Now that doctors and scientists–and yes, lay people too–are looking closer–we can hear the rooster a-crowing. Lots of rats in that river.

    • A Little Help says:

      The tone of the articlae is highly suspect. It shows that the writers have a bias toward a predetermined outcome.

      Koch’s postulates must ALL be done in the order that he laid out in his original research.

      One cannot isolate a “hated” virus. One must isoalte and pruify and TEST to see if the material is pathogenic.

    • Mos Craciun says:

      1) I am not the admin of this blog , just a reader . But I think that your ad hominem approach towards the author doesn’t fit with the general behaviour here , especially on an issue of such gravity for everybody. Maybe in future comments you will reconsider your choice of language .

      2) the article you link to (from doesn’t send to any scientific paper in support of the claims made. So are the others mentioned with links there .They are just PR materials, with a marketing flavor , written in order to get more grants and more requests for their “product” .

      Yes, as you write ” the internet is literally swarming with articles describing virologists having covid isolates” . To the above I will say : put your money where your mouth is ! But real money, not PR texts in tabloids …

      • Victus says:

        There is absolutely NO isolated virus of any kind, be it cov, hiv, measles, ebola, ebv, sars, etc. etc. etc…. not a single one! The proponents of these viruses have been embarrassed over the decades and hiding their heads in shame from the constant barrage of requests to show their isolated virus for the world to see.

        This is why every marketing article out there sings the jingles of isolation but never ever outlines the exact scientific procedure used for their alleged isolation. It’s because there is NO isolation. And there absolutely will NEVER be one. Why? Because it will expose the fact that there is no virus whatsoever…. not good for business!!

  38. I am advised by a researcher in genetics that this is a non-issue and more or less standard practice. Once you have the gene sequence, no more reason to keep the virus on hand, for you can reconstitute it at will.

    • A Little Help says:

      How do know that they have the RNA for the virus?

      How many genes does a fruit fly have? How many does a human being have?

    • Mos Craciun says:

      I am advised by another researcher in genetics that this is a crucial issue and more or less scientific fraud practice.

      In order to have the gene sequence you need to have the virus in hand first , meaning to isolate it !

    • Piksil says:

      “Once you have the gene sequence, no more reason to keep the virus on hand, for you can reconstitute it at will.”

      It’s Shake-n-Bake!
      Add water, makes its own sauce.
      Order on Prime Day and get 20% off your gene sequence order.*

      Covid. It’s what’s for dinner.

      *while supplies last. Amazon reserves the right to limit quantities. This product has been scraped off of filthy paper currency. No returns if product has been run through electron microscopy. Returns are possible if reconstituted and used tor media photo-shoots, please contact us for details.

  39. Gareth Hawker says:

    What about this paper by Wang et al?

    • Mos Craciun says:

      The link is for the abstract only –please read the full article.

      1) the full paper is about promoting a diagnostic method in China — chest ( lung, thorax) tomography . Indeed , they started to scan in radiology dept. potential infected patients. What they don’t say in the paper is the fact that many people were scanned at huge doses of ionizing radiation , which in turn created massive inflammation of lungs , which in turn induced severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS — not to be confused with the “virus” of the same name). Then they pretended that the growing difficulty in breathing is “proof of the new illness” , intubated their victims who will die in few days . In fact , what they did in China , is radiation poisoning at tomography , and that at huge doses, and that is why is called SARP ( severe acute radiation poisoning)
      2) unfortunately the chinese “method for diagnostic” was imported later on in USA and Europe . After a positive PCR so-called test , the selected ones ( old people, on welfare , homeless, etc ) were submitted to CT-scan , done as described above, with resulting deaths and increase in statistics . Nobody will dare to do dose reconstruction of the studies in radiology departments . That is how the deaths occurred in hospitals in New York : first huge dose ionizing radiation at CT-scan, then intubation.

      3)the article you propose is mentioning , indeed, the fact that ” airway epithelial cells from infected patients were used to isolate a novel coronavirus” but doesn’t give any details about the steps taken and therefore has no scientific value for the issue debated by Jon.

      • Gareth Hawker says:

        Sorry, I did not see this. It has only just popped up, two years too late! Many thanks for your thoughtful and encouraging reply.

  40. terry says:

    meanwhile….in Australia….. “Australian Government health website has this advice for health proffesionals

    “The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base.”,

    “COVID-19 is an emerging viral infectious disease. There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”

  41. Geoff says:

    According to this article in Nature the RNA has been sequenced.

  42. John Adams says:


    To: Ben Tucker and Gareth Hawker


    Take up your case with Health Canada and the U.S. CDC

    To all Interested…. See

    Dr. Carrie Madej
    Forward to/Start at min. 5.18 on the video

    Health Canada has no record of “COVID-19 virus” isolation
    A colleague in New Zealand and I (CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to various institutions around the world seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
    Our requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” isolation performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.

    Thus far (September 4, 2020) 8 Canadian institutions have provided their final responses: Health Canada, the National Research Council of Canada, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac), the Region of Peel (Ontario), the University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University and Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto) (researchers from the last 4 institutions had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”).

    Every institution has indicated the same: that they searched their records and located none describing the isolation of any “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first unadulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum). (Update, October 9 2020: One institution has now failed to co-operate. Shame on you, University of Auckland. More on that further below.)

    See the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions other than the Health Canada. Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada. Here is a pdf containing all 19 “isolation of SARS-COV-2” FOI responses that we are aware of from around the world, as of Oct. 10, 2020:

    (And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the METHODS used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)

    Regarding Health Canada specifically… despite:… the fact that a virus that has never been isolated has also never been sequenced or shown scientifically to be the cause of any illness;

    Health Canada has apparently seen no need to ensure that “the deadly virus” has actually been isolated from a patient sample by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet, and has no records indicating that it has been.

    Virus isolation and other basic “COVID-19” science is simply an article of faith with Health Canada.

  43. P. Revere says:

    How Big Pharma controls the policy-making decisions of the WHO. The WHO expert group is beholden to Big Pharma for funding initiatives and is quick to respond to industry lobbying. The EWG works directly with Big Pharma’s International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufactures and Associations (IFPMA) for research, development and financing of upcoming public health initiatives and goals.

    In one instance, the EWG were presented with a plan to advance pharmaceutical products in exchange for a tax on pharmaceutical profits. The proposal would make the WHO a drug pimp for the pharmaceutical industry and the drug makers would have to raise their prices to pay their pimp.

    In the EWG draft final report, the financing mechanism included a new indirect tax on the consumer, taxation of repatriated pharmaceutical profits, and new donor funds for health research and development. In order to advance the WHO’s agendas, the final report gave five funding options from Big Pharma: funding via product development partnerships, direct grants to small companies and grants for DC trials, milestone prizes, end prizes, and purchase or procurement agreements.

    Now controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, the WHO has been dictating all health information throughout social media and the news networks. Facebook, Twitter, Vimeo and other social media platforms will not allow any health information that is not approved by the Big Pharma-controlled WHO. The pharmaceutical industry is keeping the WHO funded, and is benefiting by using it as the ultimate authority on health, to dictate information on vaccines and drugs and to cover up industry crimes.

    An agency that was intended to safeguard public health has been weaponized into a totalitarian dictatorship that not only promotes Big Pharma, but also seeks to eliminate any information or health solutions not patented and profited on by Big Pharma. The WHO has been weaponized and is involved in crimes against humanity. Member countries must work diligently to unravel the WHO’s Big Pharma conflicts of interest and to hold the agency accountable to ultimately restore the integrity of the organization and improve its operations.

    • A LIttle Help says:

      How would they have isolated the pathogenetic virus before testing to see if it is the cause?

      You cannot just isolate THE CAUSE.

      You haev to test to find what the cause may be.

  44. A Little Help says:

    If the isolate is not available, how did they test the assay with RNA? Wouldn’t the RNA be the isolate for SARS-COV 2?

    People often hear what they want to hear.

  45. A Little Help says:

    What have they siad?

    Nothing of any substance relating to pathogenicity.

    People hear what they want to hear.

  46. andrew james says:

    When a doctor tells someone that their family member died of corona isn’t that proof that a virus exists?

  47. Doug says:

    In perusing many of the papers put forth by trolls that is the same unsubstantiated and poor scientific procedure that does not resemble anything even remotely close to the scientific method. Here are some things you should be reading in a scientific paper that claims to have identified a new virus and properly isolated and purified it. I also want to remind you that does not prove contagion – only that it exists

    Fluid sample from someone should be mixed with sucrose
    The mixture should be placed into a subterfuge and spun around at high speed to layer the various components into gradient densities
    The tube materials should be filtered into these bands
    A protien profile of the sucrose gradient density band at 1.16 g/ml should be examined under an electron microscope to see if anything is there

    These procedures were set forth by the Louis Pastuer Institute in 1973

  48. Mos Craciun says:

    So , 17 authors got 2 samples from 2 “patients ? Wow !

  49. Leslie Lesh says:

    If my mother had balls she would be my father…CDC is on the rock, irrelevant. Worse than the WHO…move on….

  50. CovFeFe Revealed??? says:

    >>Because they can’t isolate it. That’s obvious.

    If they could isolate it, they would.<<

    Let me fix this for you…

    "If they could isolate, AND IT WAS IN THEIR INTEREST TO DO SO, they would."

    I think you will agree with the update.

    Perhaps they can isolate it, but it is NOT in their interest to do so.

    If they isolated it, it could then be tested, and if it was tested, maybe a lot of people don't get sick. The someone would study why. Oh, Antoine Bechamp was right, if the immune system is good the person doesn't get sick.

    The case for vaccinating people with good immune systems flies right out the window.

    Bill Gates is not sending out smiley emogies with that concept, is he?

    I'm not saying I know what Money Power Empire is doing, but I am saying what I've stated above seems entirely consistent with the evidence I've seen to date, including the evidence you've presented.

    BTW, keep up the good work. I enjoy reading your thoughts on these relevant issues buried by the BanksterStream Media Complex.

  51. Jack F says:

    “For over twenty years Bill Gates and his Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) (and his allies, including Big-Pharma, WHO, UNICEF, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of NIAID / NIH, a close ally of Mr. Gates) have been vaccinating foremost children by the millions in remote areas of poor countries, mostly Africa and Asia. Most of their vaccination program had disastrous results, causing the very illness (polio, for example in India) and sterilizing young women (Kenya, with modified tetanus vaccines). Many of the children died. Many of the programs were carried out with the backing of the WHO and – yes – the UN Agency responsible for the Protection of Children, UNICEF. Most of these vaccination campaigns were implemented without the informed-consent of the children, parents or guardians, nor with the informed-consent, or with forged consent, of the respective government authorities. In the aftermath, The Gates Foundation was sued by governments around the world, Kenya, India, the Philippines – and more.”

    -Robert F. Kennedy Jr

  52. Drake R says:

    Viral Facts:

    ‣ Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
    ‣ Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
    ‣ Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
    ‣ Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
    ‣ Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
    ‣ Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
    ‣ There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
    ‣ Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
    ‣ Viruses are very specific protein structures.
    ‣ Coughing, sneezing is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
    ‣ Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
    ‣ Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
    ‣ Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.
    ‣ Viruses do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
    ‣ Viruses are not alive.
    ‣ Viruses are not contagious.

    1) Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923
    2) The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912
    3) Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)
    4) The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’.)

  53. Yuri says:

    If the virus doesn’t exist, then what are people dying from all of a sudden? I know a few people who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and died shortly after.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      Deaths from many causes are being mis characterised as COVID. This for simple monetary compensation. Doctors get paid for admitting someone with COVID to hospital. Hospitals get paid too and everyone who goes on a ventilator earns the doctor and hospitals lots more money too. In the end excess deaths have been examined and no excess deaths have occurred. As Covid deaths go up, other causes of death have dropped off. In some cases the drop in deaths such as from cardio and various respiratory diseases is setting new records for how low. It is all out there but media is printing lies and the ring masters, like Fauci and Gates who have vested interests are telling lies.

  54. The virus HAS been isolated. It has not been PURIFIED.

  55. Angus MacDuff says:

    seems that the canucks did it in early march 2020

  56. WayneF says:

    I have to play devil’s advocate here (sorry, not having read the many comments already here).

    The statement you’ve highlighted:
    “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
    uses the term “currently available”. This potentially implies isolates were available at some point, further suggesting it’s existence. Do you know this is not the case Jon? This can’t be taken as A CDC admission, on the face of it (maybe there’s more to this than you’ve mentioned?). Feels like a conclusion jumped to. Watch out for motivated reasoning.

    Also the CDC didn’t use the word “unavailable” (you said “their word, not mine” and you used quotation braces). You have summarized “no… isolates… currently available” and that’s fine but drop the quotations.

    • Steven says:

      Watch the video
      With the N.I.A
      And the reason they wont and dont show the virus is because they put a Patent on it. So more less they own it…must see the video to understand.

      • Rabbitnexus says:

        yes, and this is exactly why they know the sequence, despite not having isolated it. The truth is in plain site. It is too grotesque and too massive a fraud for most people to comprehend. When I consider how terrified so many were of learning the truth of 9/11, which still keeps some feeble souls captive, I can’t even begin to imagine the terror anyone trying to acknowledge this one from the cotton wool existence the unaware inhabit. faces.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      There have been no isolated virus available anywhere this question has been put since then either. It is now January 2021! Here in Australia, in Canada and other countries FOIA requests have all come up with the same admission they have no virus.

      Also not currently available implies that it MIGHT become available as much as it may have been. It doesn’t imply only that it has been available. It might never have been available but they expect it to be. In truth it is just their words admitting they do not have it. Indeed, if they ever did have, why wouldn’t they still have it? Did they throw it away maybe? Lose it? You realise they can store it and even replicate it, so they would have a sample everywhere if there was one anywhere.

  57. James Myers says:

    Covid 19 has been the root of corruption for most governments around the world. As if they really care about your health. They mostly care about their pocket.

  58. Susan says:

    To CDC Dir. Dr. Redfield Why is the PCR test used if it can’t detect a Covid-19 infection?

    To: CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield


    To: Deputy Director (Acting), Stephen C. Redd MD, RADM USPHS


    From: Susan […]

    December 13, 2020

    Dear CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield and Deputy Director Stephen C. Redd MD, RADM USPHS,

    I’m writing to ask why has the CDC represented Covid-19 as being a dangerous deadly infectious disease if the CDC

    also represents the PCR test as unable to detect a Covid-19 infection?

    Consider the following scenario.

    If a patient goes to the doctor with a complaint of strep throat, the doctor will swab the throat area and have it cultured in a lab.

    If the culture is determined to be strep, then the doctor will prescribe antibiotics to the patient.

    However, if a patient goes to the doctor with a complaint of the flu, the doctor will tell the patient that virus cannot be cultured, and antibiotics cannot be prescribed.

    Why can’t a virus be cultured? The reason is, a virus is not alive. It has no respiration and it cannot reproduce itself. If it isn’t alive, then logically speaking, how is it infectious?

    Although the CDC has recommended PCR tests to document the difference between Covid-19 and the regular flu, the CDC has also simultaneously claimed the PCR test cannot detect a contagious infection as stated below:


    CDC quote: ‘Overview of Influenza Testing Methods’ Is it Flu or COVID-19

    CDC: “Some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, making it hard to tell the difference between them based

    on symptoms alone. Diagnostic testing can help determine if you are sick with the flu or COVID-19.”


    CDC: Viral Testing Authorized assays for viral testing include those that detect SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid or antigen. Viral (nucleic acid or antigen) tests check samples from the respiratory system (such as nasal or oral swabs or saliva)

    to determine whether an infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is present.

    Viral tests are recommended to diagnose acute infection of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, to guide contact tracing, treatment options, and isolation requirements .,%2C%20and%20isolation%20requirements.


    However, also according to the CDC, the PCR test cannot document a SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) infection nor can it reveal contagion.


    CDC: Information on Rapid Molecular Assays, RT-PCR, and other Molecular Assays for Diagnosis of Influenza Virus Infection

    CDC: “Notably the detection of influenza viral RNA or nucleic acids by molecular assays

    does not necessarily indicate detection of viable virus or on-going influenza viral replication.” Page last reviewed: October 21, 2019


    Accordingly, the CDC said scientific testing shouldn’t be used to justify ending quarantines and instead recommends a non-scientific anecdotal symptom-based criteria to be used instead:


    CDC Quote: Discontinuation of Isolation for Persons with COVOD-19 Not in Healthcare Settings

    A test-based strategy is no longer recommended to determine when to discontinue home isolation,

    except in certain circumstances. July 20, 2020

    *Symptom-based criteria were modified as follows:

    Changed from “improvement in respiratory symptoms” to “improvement in symptoms” to address expanding list of symptoms associated with COVID-19.

    *Studies have not found evidence that clinically recovered persons with persistence of viral RNA have transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to others.


    · So, if the CDC simultaneously recommends the PCR test be used to document a Covid-19 infection,

    · but then states the PCR test cannot document a Covid-19 infection,

    · then recommends an unscientific symptoms-based approach to set quarantine policy

    · and claims that people who have recovered from these “symptoms” have not transmitted Covid 19 to others,


    *What scientific proof is being used to document that people in the USA have died of infectious Covid-19?

    *What scientific proof is being used to document that people in the USA have been infected with Covid 19?

    *What scientific proof is being used to justify that people in the USA need to wear masks, be tracked, quarantined and vaccinated?

    *Anecdotal symptoms cannot form the basis of public policy.

    Therefore, in the absence of scientific evidence to document a massive pandemic due to highly infectious Covid-19, why has the CDC declared a State of Emergency in the USA?


    Susan […]

  59. hitzefrei says:

    I checked the linked report of the CDC.
    It looks like they must have reworded in between when this report was written and today (it says Effective: 12/01/2020). On page 42 they state:
    “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted….”
    SO…do they have it quantified NOW??
    ALSO….why are they calling it 2019-nCoV and not SARS-Cov2, I know these are supposedly the same but is there a reason they chose the first name over the second in this document?

  60. Great news that NASA also had been playing a big role fighting COVID -19

  61. Rabbitnexus says:

    Yes, it is an abominable fraud. I’ve never even imagined so many could be fooled so easily with so little into doing so much harm to themselves and the societies we once had. It is all gone now and I don’t see anything we might still think of as normal returning either. The masters of this deception have got obvious plans and the agenda is everything. For now they are getting obedience and adherence to rules which are senseless and even counterproductive. The zombies who buy into it have given it their all. They will sell out anyone not complying, their own family even and they will even physically attack anyone seen as non-compliant if they can get up the courage. The hysteria and barely controlled panic I see in the eyes and voices of those I meet who have bought it is disturbing. They do not seem to be anymore part pf the human race as I knew it. Even at the start when I bought into it to the degree I got hold of quinine and azithromycin and zinc, before it went out of reach I knew there was a lot wrong. Which is why I got hold of quinine and azimthromycin. The Chinese said it was effective in January. I knew if it was then this would rapidly be unavailable which it soon was. Interestingly the fact quine and zinc cure all corona-viruses in a few days was discovered in 2005 through SARS research. This is amply attested to if one does a search on corona-virus, quine, zinc but limits the dates of the search to pre-2019. Include 2019 and you’ll get nothing but page after page of ‘sciency’ articles denying this and even trials which were set up to fail…by not including zinc. They do not want us to know about this. One reason other than this ridiculous fake pandemic is that corona-viruses are the main area of bio-weapons research since the 1970s. Quinine it seems renders 50 years of bio-weapons research to redundancy.

    Since the start I have followed all that has come up and am now fully cognisant of the hoax and how they’re doing it and fir sure the PCR test is the lynchpin of the whole bullshit charade. The vaccine is the scariest thing of it all. It is obviously not a vaccine against any coronavirus. The type of vaccine has failed at animal testing every time it got that far over 30 years. The very problems which stopped it at that stage appear to be foremost among the bad reactions seen in those who have had it in tests of the first vaccinated subjects. Whatever else happens going forward, I have made my decision to oppose it at every point. I recognise the consequences this might have and have plans up to and including cutting loose from this dying civilisation. This includes annexing part of the vast country I live in if I can find enough of the right people to begin. I’ve got the traditional land owners on side.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      I wrote rapidly and some typos entered into it. I meant to write Quinine each time it became quine. This is of course hydroxychloroquine sulphate in its commonly seen form. Whether or not this virus exists, )which it very well may not, I think they’re spoofing us with our own exosomes) the quinine and zinc combo is worth taking onboard because there is every reason to believe they intend to release some real ones going forward and as said it is what all-bio-weapons are about these days.

      I am wondering very much about the plans of the “farmers” since the vaccine is obviously intended to cull a lot of people and make them dumber and more compliant I think, does this mean they’re going to cull the dummies above all? It makes sense from a eugenicists point of view maybe, cull the dumbest and most bovine types, they’re far from the best of humanity. On the other hand that doesn’t fit the attitude of those elite rats, so what is the plan for those who see through it and resist? Directly take us out with the enthusiastic backing of the masked karen cult?

  62. leanne says:

    I partly agree with this post. It is somewhat of a plan.

  63. Shawn Bran says:

    I have looked and looked on page 39 of the cdc report you have referenced and simply cant find what you are saying. I know that the pdf file page 39 is different from the actual document page and I looked there too, still cant find what you are saying. This is what I cant find: The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…” Maybe I missed it I dont know. I would like to share this info with others but if I cant find the “smoking gun” phrase myself How can I spread the word?

  64. Shawn Bran says:

    This publication says it has: isolated SARS-CoV-2 from 2 infected patients in Toronto, Canada; determined the genomic sequences; and identified single-nucleotide changes in representative populations of our virus stocks.

    what would be your reply?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *