COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

by Jon Rappoport

October 9, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

This is a follow-up to yesterday’s article, in which I exposed the fact that the CDC does not have the COVID coronavirus in its possession, because it is “unavailable.” Their word, not mine.

The CDC is admitting the virus hasn’t been isolated. In other words, its existence is unproven.

You need to realize the CDC, during its own published confession (see below), is discussing this explosive situation in the context of instructing the world how to perform the PCR test.

The test to detect a virus that isn’t there.

This would be on the order of NASA issuing a guide for navigating a fleet of ships to a planet whose existence has not been established—and the population of the whole world is going to board those ships for the voyage.

The CDC is saying: here is how you detect the virus in a human, here is the test on which we’re going to rely, here is the test on the basis of which we’re going to identify all case numbers and demand all lockdowns—except we don’t have the virus.

Why don’t they have it?

Because they can’t isolate it. That’s obvious.

If they could isolate it, they would.

Let’s not tap dance around this central fact. Let’s not make excuses for the CDC. They have a problem the size of Jupiter. It’s their problem, not ours. But they’re foisting their problem on us, in the form of a STORY ABOUT A PANDEMIC. AND ALL THE LOCKDOWNS THAT FLOW FROM THE STORY.

To say this is unacceptable is a vast understatement. The CDC is committing a crime that has no bounds.

For months, I’ve been writing about the “missing virus” and the studies that should be done to prove it exists—real-world studies that have never been done and will never be done. Now, here is the smoking gun.

I’m aware that many scientists and doctors, who are otherwise exposing the pandemic as a fraud on legitimate grounds, don’t want to touch what I’m revealing here. I would remind them that, months ago, when some of us were already exposing the PCR test as unreliable and useless and deceptive, THAT ISSUE was too hot to touch. But now it isn’t.

The issue of the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus may seem as if it’s too hot, but it isn’t. It’s time to launch a full-on attack. Immediately.

The truth is only bitter for those who are hiding it.

I’m also aware there are people who have been building scenarios about how the virus is “activated.” Certain frequencies wake it up, and so on. Well, the question is: WHAT VIRUS? THE ONE THAT ISN’T THERE?

Still other people would say, “Then what are all these scientists sequencing in their labs, if it’s not the virus?” Again, not our problem. They might start with a piece of RNA, and then claim, without proof, it’s part of SARS-CoV-2; and they go to work on it. They claim anything they want to. It’s not science.

If a mechanic says he has a piece of a fender from a car that has never been seen before; if he claims he knows the car exists; but he can’t show you the car; are you going to buy his story? Are you going to invest your life-savings and life-savings of your family and friends in this car he admits is “unavailable?” Are you going to invest and go broke and sit in your home and wear a mask and keep your distance from other people and close your business and declare bankruptcy? Are you going to consent to that?

Another question that arises: if the virus is missing and has never been isolated, has never been proved to exist, what are they putting in the COVID vaccine? That’s a question that should be answered by law-enforcement agencies raiding many facilities and seizing materials and finding honest scientists who will discover what is really in the COVID vaccine brews. Waiting for that to happen…the sun could go dark first. In the meantime, do you want to take the shot in the arm?

Some people have claimed there are “animal models” which prove the coronavirus exists and is harmful, because the animals become sick, when they are “injected with the virus.” This is incorrect on two counts.

First, the animal models are supposed to progress through various species, until they arrive at animals that most closely resemble humans; chimps. The animal models being cited are mice or hamsters, which are very, very low on the totem pole.

Second, what are these mice being injected with? It’s supposed to be pure virus. But instead, it’s a soup which contains all sorts of material, including chemicals. The chemicals could be causing the animals to become ill.


Here is my breaking story about the virus that isn’t there, from yesterday:

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

149 comments on “COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

  1. Jack F says:

    “For over twenty years Bill Gates and his Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) (and his allies, including Big-Pharma, WHO, UNICEF, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of NIAID / NIH, a close ally of Mr. Gates) have been vaccinating foremost children by the millions in remote areas of poor countries, mostly Africa and Asia. Most of their vaccination program had disastrous results, causing the very illness (polio, for example in India) and sterilizing young women (Kenya, with modified tetanus vaccines). Many of the children died. Many of the programs were carried out with the backing of the WHO and – yes – the UN Agency responsible for the Protection of Children, UNICEF. Most of these vaccination campaigns were implemented without the informed-consent of the children, parents or guardians, nor with the informed-consent, or with forged consent, of the respective government authorities. In the aftermath, The Gates Foundation was sued by governments around the world, Kenya, India, the Philippines – and more.”

    -Robert F. Kennedy Jr

  2. Drake R says:

    Viral Facts:

    ‣ Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
    ‣ Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
    ‣ Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
    ‣ Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
    ‣ Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
    ‣ Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
    ‣ Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
    ‣ There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
    ‣ Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
    ‣ Viruses are very specific protein structures.
    ‣ Coughing, sneezing is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
    ‣ Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
    ‣ Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
    ‣ Viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.
    ‣ Viruses do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
    ‣ Viruses are not alive.
    ‣ Viruses are not contagious.

    References:
    1) Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923
    2) The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912
    3) Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)
    4) The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’.)

  3. Yuri says:

    If the virus doesn’t exist, then what are people dying from all of a sudden? I know a few people who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and died shortly after.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      Deaths from many causes are being mis characterised as COVID. This for simple monetary compensation. Doctors get paid for admitting someone with COVID to hospital. Hospitals get paid too and everyone who goes on a ventilator earns the doctor and hospitals lots more money too. In the end excess deaths have been examined and no excess deaths have occurred. As Covid deaths go up, other causes of death have dropped off. In some cases the drop in deaths such as from cardio and various respiratory diseases is setting new records for how low. It is all out there but media is printing lies and the ring masters, like Fauci and Gates who have vested interests are telling lies.

  4. The virus HAS been isolated. It has not been PURIFIED.

  5. Angus MacDuff says:

    https://sunnybrook.ca/research/media/item.asp?i=2069

    seems that the canucks did it in early march 2020

  6. WayneF says:

    I have to play devil’s advocate here (sorry, not having read the many comments already here).

    The statement you’ve highlighted:
    “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
    uses the term “currently available”. This potentially implies isolates were available at some point, further suggesting it’s existence. Do you know this is not the case Jon? This can’t be taken as A CDC admission, on the face of it (maybe there’s more to this than you’ve mentioned?). Feels like a conclusion jumped to. Watch out for motivated reasoning.

    Also the CDC didn’t use the word “unavailable” (you said “their word, not mine” and you used quotation braces). You have summarized “no… isolates… currently available” and that’s fine but drop the quotations.

    • Steven says:

      Watch the video
      DAVID MARTIN PHD
      With the N.I.A
      And the reason they wont and dont show the virus is because they put a Patent on it. So more less they own it…must see the video to understand.

      • Rabbitnexus says:

        yes, and this is exactly why they know the sequence, despite not having isolated it. The truth is in plain site. It is too grotesque and too massive a fraud for most people to comprehend. When I consider how terrified so many were of learning the truth of 9/11, which still keeps some feeble souls captive, I can’t even begin to imagine the terror anyone trying to acknowledge this one from the cotton wool existence the unaware inhabit. faces.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      There have been no isolated virus available anywhere this question has been put since then either. It is now January 2021! Here in Australia, in Canada and other countries FOIA requests have all come up with the same admission they have no virus.

      Also not currently available implies that it MIGHT become available as much as it may have been. It doesn’t imply only that it has been available. It might never have been available but they expect it to be. In truth it is just their words admitting they do not have it. Indeed, if they ever did have, why wouldn’t they still have it? Did they throw it away maybe? Lose it? You realise they can store it and even replicate it, so they would have a sample everywhere if there was one anywhere.

  7. James Myers says:

    Covid 19 has been the root of corruption for most governments around the world. As if they really care about your health. They mostly care about their pocket.

    https://www.prpremium.ca/

  8. Susan says:

    To CDC Dir. Dr. Redfield Why is the PCR test used if it can’t detect a Covid-19 infection?

    To: CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield

    […]

    To: Deputy Director (Acting), Stephen C. Redd MD, RADM USPHS

    […]

    From: Susan […]

    December 13, 2020

    Dear CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield and Deputy Director Stephen C. Redd MD, RADM USPHS,

    I’m writing to ask why has the CDC represented Covid-19 as being a dangerous deadly infectious disease if the CDC

    also represents the PCR test as unable to detect a Covid-19 infection?

    Consider the following scenario.

    If a patient goes to the doctor with a complaint of strep throat, the doctor will swab the throat area and have it cultured in a lab.

    If the culture is determined to be strep, then the doctor will prescribe antibiotics to the patient.

    However, if a patient goes to the doctor with a complaint of the flu, the doctor will tell the patient that virus cannot be cultured, and antibiotics cannot be prescribed.

    Why can’t a virus be cultured? The reason is, a virus is not alive. It has no respiration and it cannot reproduce itself. If it isn’t alive, then logically speaking, how is it infectious?

    Although the CDC has recommended PCR tests to document the difference between Covid-19 and the regular flu, the CDC has also simultaneously claimed the PCR test cannot detect a contagious infection as stated below:

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    CDC quote: ‘Overview of Influenza Testing Methods’ Is it Flu or COVID-19

    CDC: “Some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, making it hard to tell the difference between them based

    on symptoms alone. Diagnostic testing can help determine if you are sick with the flu or COVID-19.”

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/overview-testing-methods.htm

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    CDC: Viral Testing Authorized assays for viral testing include those that detect SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid or antigen. Viral (nucleic acid or antigen) tests check samples from the respiratory system (such as nasal or oral swabs or saliva)

    to determine whether an infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is present.

    Viral tests are recommended to diagnose acute infection of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, to guide contact tracing, treatment options, and isolation requirements .

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/testing-overview.html#:~:text=Viral%20(nucleic%20acid%20or,%2C%20and%20isolation%20requirements.

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    However, also according to the CDC, the PCR test cannot document a SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) infection nor can it reveal contagion.

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    CDC: Information on Rapid Molecular Assays, RT-PCR, and other Molecular Assays for Diagnosis of Influenza Virus Infection

    CDC: “Notably the detection of influenza viral RNA or nucleic acids by molecular assays

    does not necessarily indicate detection of viable virus or on-going influenza viral replication.”

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/molecular-assays.htm Page last reviewed: October 21, 2019

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Accordingly, the CDC said scientific testing shouldn’t be used to justify ending quarantines and instead recommends a non-scientific anecdotal symptom-based criteria to be used instead:

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    CDC Quote: Discontinuation of Isolation for Persons with COVOD-19 Not in Healthcare Settings

    A test-based strategy is no longer recommended to determine when to discontinue home isolation,

    except in certain circumstances. July 20, 2020

    *Symptom-based criteria were modified as follows:

    Changed from “improvement in respiratory symptoms” to “improvement in symptoms” to address expanding list of symptoms associated with COVID-19.

    *Studies have not found evidence that clinically recovered persons with persistence of viral RNA have transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to others.

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/disposition-in-home-patients.html

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    · So, if the CDC simultaneously recommends the PCR test be used to document a Covid-19 infection,

    · but then states the PCR test cannot document a Covid-19 infection,

    · then recommends an unscientific symptoms-based approach to set quarantine policy

    · and claims that people who have recovered from these “symptoms” have not transmitted Covid 19 to others,

    then

    *What scientific proof is being used to document that people in the USA have died of infectious Covid-19?

    *What scientific proof is being used to document that people in the USA have been infected with Covid 19?

    *What scientific proof is being used to justify that people in the USA need to wear masks, be tracked, quarantined and vaccinated?

    *Anecdotal symptoms cannot form the basis of public policy.

    Therefore, in the absence of scientific evidence to document a massive pandemic due to highly infectious Covid-19, why has the CDC declared a State of Emergency in the USA?

    Sincerely,

    Susan […]

  9. hitzefrei says:

    I checked the linked report of the CDC.
    It looks like they must have reworded in between when this report was written and today (it says Effective: 12/01/2020). On page 42 they state:
    “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted….”
    SO…do they have it quantified NOW??
    ALSO….why are they calling it 2019-nCoV and not SARS-Cov2, I know these are supposedly the same but is there a reason they chose the first name over the second in this document?

  10. Great news that NASA also had been playing a big role fighting COVID -19

  11. Rabbitnexus says:

    Yes, it is an abominable fraud. I’ve never even imagined so many could be fooled so easily with so little into doing so much harm to themselves and the societies we once had. It is all gone now and I don’t see anything we might still think of as normal returning either. The masters of this deception have got obvious plans and the agenda is everything. For now they are getting obedience and adherence to rules which are senseless and even counterproductive. The zombies who buy into it have given it their all. They will sell out anyone not complying, their own family even and they will even physically attack anyone seen as non-compliant if they can get up the courage. The hysteria and barely controlled panic I see in the eyes and voices of those I meet who have bought it is disturbing. They do not seem to be anymore part pf the human race as I knew it. Even at the start when I bought into it to the degree I got hold of quinine and azithromycin and zinc, before it went out of reach I knew there was a lot wrong. Which is why I got hold of quinine and azimthromycin. The Chinese said it was effective in January. I knew if it was then this would rapidly be unavailable which it soon was. Interestingly the fact quine and zinc cure all corona-viruses in a few days was discovered in 2005 through SARS research. This is amply attested to if one does a search on corona-virus, quine, zinc but limits the dates of the search to pre-2019. Include 2019 and you’ll get nothing but page after page of ‘sciency’ articles denying this and even trials which were set up to fail…by not including zinc. They do not want us to know about this. One reason other than this ridiculous fake pandemic is that corona-viruses are the main area of bio-weapons research since the 1970s. Quinine it seems renders 50 years of bio-weapons research to redundancy.

    Since the start I have followed all that has come up and am now fully cognisant of the hoax and how they’re doing it and fir sure the PCR test is the lynchpin of the whole bullshit charade. The vaccine is the scariest thing of it all. It is obviously not a vaccine against any coronavirus. The type of vaccine has failed at animal testing every time it got that far over 30 years. The very problems which stopped it at that stage appear to be foremost among the bad reactions seen in those who have had it in tests of the first vaccinated subjects. Whatever else happens going forward, I have made my decision to oppose it at every point. I recognise the consequences this might have and have plans up to and including cutting loose from this dying civilisation. This includes annexing part of the vast country I live in if I can find enough of the right people to begin. I’ve got the traditional land owners on side.

    • Rabbitnexus says:

      I wrote rapidly and some typos entered into it. I meant to write Quinine each time it became quine. This is of course hydroxychloroquine sulphate in its commonly seen form. Whether or not this virus exists, )which it very well may not, I think they’re spoofing us with our own exosomes) the quinine and zinc combo is worth taking onboard because there is every reason to believe they intend to release some real ones going forward and as said it is what all-bio-weapons are about these days.

      I am wondering very much about the plans of the “farmers” since the vaccine is obviously intended to cull a lot of people and make them dumber and more compliant I think, does this mean they’re going to cull the dummies above all? It makes sense from a eugenicists point of view maybe, cull the dumbest and most bovine types, they’re far from the best of humanity. On the other hand that doesn’t fit the attitude of those elite rats, so what is the plan for those who see through it and resist? Directly take us out with the enthusiastic backing of the masked karen cult?

  12. leanne says:

    I partly agree with this post. It is somewhat of a plan.
    https://thebestcbdcreams.com/

  13. Shawn Bran says:

    I have looked and looked on page 39 of the cdc report you have referenced and simply cant find what you are saying. I know that the pdf file page 39 is different from the actual document page and I looked there too, still cant find what you are saying. This is what I cant find: The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…” Maybe I missed it I dont know. I would like to share this info with others but if I cant find the “smoking gun” phrase myself How can I spread the word?

  14. Shawn Bran says:

    This publication says it has: isolated SARS-CoV-2 from 2 infected patients in Toronto, Canada; determined the genomic sequences; and identified single-nucleotide changes in representative populations of our virus stocks.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32558639/

    what would be your reply?

Comments are closed.