The great virus hoax in modern medicine

The great virus hoax in modern medicine

“It’s a virus, but we just can’t find it.”

by Jon Rappoport

December 27, 2017

“It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s a UFO, it’s a virus from outer space.”

My previous article detailed: cooking up fake threats of viruses from outer space. This could be the next “UFO disclosure” coming on the heels of recent Pentagon reports of alien craft in the skies.

Now let’s come back to Earth.

Here is the basic background. If researchers say they’ve found a new disease caused by a virus, they’re saying people who have the disease have the virus in their bodies.

These people must have the virus. Otherwise, they don’t have the disease. Remember that.

I’m now going to detail two examples where VERY embarrassing information surfaced about so-called viral epidemics.

One: Swine Flu, the big epidemic of 2009.

The CDC was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu. NO SIGN OF THE SWINE FLU VIRUS.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu virus or any other kind of flu virus.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it.

And CBS will conveniently forget how it aided and abetted the CDC, by censoring real news, and instead opted for egregious and titanic fake news.

Two: the great SARS epidemic of 2003.

A few basic official “facts”: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) includes the following symptoms—cough, fever, fatigue, sore throat. It originated in South China. It is caused by the SARS coronavirus. SARS is unique. It is a newly discovered condition. The coronavirus is newly discovered.

I saw holes in this presentation. For example, the SARS symptoms are indistinguishable from ordinary traditional flu or other non-specific illness that has been known about for centuries.

I kept going.

The SARS coronavirus was purportedly discovered by World Health Organization (WHO) researchers working in ten labs linked by a private closed-circuit communication system. No outside researchers were given access.

The WHO researchers very quickly found the unique and never-before-seen coronavirus, and they labeled it the cause of SARS. At that point, virtually every virologist in the world stood up, saluted, and never questioned the finding, because to do so could earn them an ejection from The Club.

From that point on, no statistics were released that demonstrated how many diagnosed SARS patients had the coronavirus virus in their bodies and how many didn’t.

But months later, a prominent World Health Organization microbiologist in Canada, Frank Plummer, wandered off the reservation and spoke with reporters. What he said, in a series of statements, was shocking.

Plummer basically admitted that many of the newest blood samples from SARS patients coming into his lab showed no trace of the SARS coronavirus.

Independent researcher par excellence, Jim West, has preserved some of Plummer’s quotes.

Plummer: “We are finding some of the best-characterized [SARS disease] cases are negative [for the SARS virus]. So it’s puzzling. As is the fact the amounts of virus we are finding, when we find it, are very small—only detectable by very sensitive PCR [testing].”

“Once you conclude that this coronavirus is the sole cause of SARS then you move into a different phase and you move to test only for it. . . to the exclusion of other things. And I think. . . at least based on what we’re seeing in Canada. . . it’s a little early to do that…”

It was early, and also very late. SARS was already being hyped as the next big epidemic. The World Health Organization had issued a travel advisory against flying into Toronto, a supposed hot bed of the disease—costing the city billions in tourist dollars.

Finally, as with the Swine Flu, SARS was dropped like a hot potato and the virus hunters moved on, seeking the next big thing.

Arguments can be made that scientists never isolated either the SARS or the Swine Flu virus, never found it, never confirmed its existence. Or, if one wants to say these two viruses actually exist, they were never proved to cause any illness or damage at all.

Con. Hoax. No pandemic. No epidemic.

In fact, people who were ill and showed symptoms were suffering from various causes, none of which involved the viruses named by researchers.

“We found the viruses, we identified them as the cause of two distinct diseases…and now we can’t find the viruses in people.”

But don’t worry, be happy. The researchers know exactly what they’re doing. They’re brilliant. Trust them. They care about you.

You can delve further into the subject of “missing viruses.” For example, read the Christine Johnson interview of a scientist from the Australian Perth Group, “Does HIV exist?” And read my article that examines whether anyone has ever isolated the Ebola virus from a human being.

Viruses as specific causes of diseases are a main pillar of so-called medical science. Were that pillar to collapse, through acknowledging that a number of diseases have no traceable viral cause, the whole landscape would change.

Researchers would be forced to investigate nutritional and environmental causes, for example.

A collection of familiar “flu-like symptoms,” labeled with one disease-name, would be seen to spring from a number of different factors, and not the same factors in different people. So the chosen single disease-name would dissolve into dust.

Three: Will the next UFO disclosure be “biological threats from outer space?”

I return to the subject of my previous article—UFO disclosures—to emphasize a vital point. We are told that researchers have found UFO metal that resists all attempts at analysis. They don’t know what these metals are composed of. Well, reporters have gone to university “experts” in chemistry, who all say this is absurd. It’s easy to analyze any alloy in the universe. The experts are banding together to form a consensus, based on conventional principles.

On the other hand, if the next UFO disclosure warned us of something at least as far out as mysterious alloys—strange and dangerous viruses from outer space—virologists would think twice about demeaning those claims. Why? Because, in that community of professionals, any and all assertions about disease-causing viruses are treated with respect. Virology is a field where actual evidence of causation is ignored. Whoever, from a position of influence, can sell a virus story is an automatic player in the game. Especially if money will flow for research. And when it comes to viruses, there is always money to be had.

Mysterious UFO alloys? Ridiculous. Mysterious viruses? Wonderful, let’s launch research. Evidence these viruses exist and can cause disease? “Who cares? We can simply say they exist and we can simply say they cause diseases, and we can attach names to those diseases and sell the names to the public.”

Welcome to the show. Welcome to the game.

Consider Pellagra. In the first half of the 20th century, in the US, there were three million cases. 100,000 people died. Researchers at health agencies insisted there had to be a germ at the bottom of it. They looked and looked and looked.

Meanwhile, other researchers found out Pellagra was mainly a deficiency of niacin. They were pushed into the background. “A bunch of whackos. Pay no attention to them. The cause has to be a germ. We’re the germ people. We’re in charge of the research.”

Finally, after 100,000 deaths, most of which were unnecessary, the “experts” grudgingly admitted, “Yes, it’s a niacin deficiency.”

Welcome to the show. Welcome to the game.

Human lives lost? Not a factor. Not a concern.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

18 comments on “The great virus hoax in modern medicine

  1. Thank you, Jon.

  2. sundancer55 says:

    And we the people are supposed to trust the FDuh and the CDC to tell us that things like the gardasil vaccine (or any vaccine for that matter) are safe? Hey, Paul Offit even says/swears vaccines, any vaccines, any combo of vaccines, are safe in large numbers. He’s made a lot of money being an idiot for the industry. I just don’t see how he sleeps at night.

    I like Sheryl Attkisson. I follow her web site where there is some interesting stuff from time to time.

  3. 1mmf27 says:

    Thanks for all your research! No one I know understands why I don’t get flu shots. I believe too many people cannot and will not think seriously about some things. There are only so many decisions they can handle, and they prefer to let the xperts tell them what to do.


    • sundancer55 says:

      Yeah, and most of those people couldn’t define the word “expert” either. In my vocabulary, there’s really no such word because which “expert” declares another person to be an expert??? No one knows everything about anything, IMPO.

  4. simcah says:

    Jon, you should look at this: the CDC’s annual test-negative case-control flu vaccine effectiveness study could show high VE even if the only people getting sick are vaccinated! The study only enrolls sick people. It compares vaccination rates in those with confirmed flu and those with ILI (influenza-like-illness) and works backward through odds-ratio calculation to estimate what VE would be in the general population. It relies on the key assumption that being in the vaccinated group does NOT make one more likely to get ILI. But if getting the Flu vaccine were positively correlated with ILI, then this would artificially increase VE in the CDC’s studies. In the most extreme case, this could show high VE even when only vaccinated people are getting either Flu or ILI.

    Additionally, VE is not a measure of true benefit, but it is reported as such in the media and pro-vaccine propaganda. True benefit can only be known if VE is known as well as unvaccinated risk. According to the CDC’s own numbers those aged 18-49 only have about .4% chance of going to the doctor with the flue and a .03% chance of being hospitalized with flu. If the flu vaccine were actually 50% effective and you are an average person between 18-49, then your chances of getting the flu would theoretically be reduced by .2%. Not such an impressive benefit! Let’s say you’re not the average person, but are really healthy, eat right, exercise, and take Vitamin D and Vitamin C throughout the winter months. No one knows how low your chances are of getting a bad case of the flu, but probably far less than .4%, so your vaccine benefit would be even less.

  5. ErnieM says:

    Isn’t there a perverse money motivation at the root of these lies?

  6. Alexis Keiser says:

    Well, not a virus but it looks like “the powers that be” want us to worry about weaponized anthrax. Apparently, the North Koreans are looking at whether anthrax could survive the heat and pressure of traveling on a warhead. Hmm..Fox says that the US troops presently in South Korea have been vaccinated for anthrax but the South Korean troops have not. My guess: Next step is to propose vaccinating the US civilian population (or maybe stock us up on Cipro?). It would make a fortune for the pharmaceutical companies! According to Ken Alibek (former Soviet anthrax/bioweapons scientist) there is NO effective vaccine for anthrax. However, the book “Vaccine A” (abbreviated title) by Gary Matsumoto suggests how many people the vaccine might kill. Cipro (fluoroquinolone antibiotic) is no picnic, either, for that matter.

  7. rtp says:

    The easiest way to get the average imbecile to understand all of the above is to say:

    You’re scared of germs? So why on earth would you go within a million miles of a doctor”s clinic or hospital?

    If germs were one millionth as dangerous as you think then noone in their right mind would ever visit – much less become – a doctor.

    • sundancer55 says:

      @ rtp: I agree with you. People who worship doctors, however, do not see things in this way. I don’t believe in the germ theory. It’s all in the terrain, as the saying goes.

  8. sundancer55 says:

    Didja read where the FDUH is now nixing the use of homeopathics?

    The FDA continues to use flawed studies (aka “fake science”) whenever something alternative is involved. They lie, they never tell the whole truth, they never tell the whole story behind their reasons – thus the whole FDA is without merit as far as I’m concerned.

    The sad part of this entire campaign by the FDA against homeopathic and other alternative medicines (and they truly are medicines IMO) is that people will likely stop using them because of the negative press they are receiving but NEVER, not once, do you see people who’ve read anti-vaccine information moving away from those horrible poisonous killer vaccines, do you? That’s because of the marketing that all younger people seem to fall for all the time. We’d all be better off if the vaccines went into the dustbin and the homeopathics took their place.

  9. Sunshine2 says:

    Here is a recent article I was surprised to find. It is a study from UW-Madison that concludes there is not enough evidence to claim Zika causes microcephaly. In fact the doctor heading the study disproving the connection states that the CDC and WHO jumped to conclusions and created a false crisis.

    What surprised me was not the study’s results, as Jon came to the same conclusions for many of the same reasons back in 2015, but that a doctor would openly challenge the agencies with the truth, and that this is published and can be found under a news search on the web.

  10. Jon

    The “seeds of deceit” are already being sewn. “Asteroid hunters”. aided by the “visibility” of YouTube, have stepped up efforts (albeit mostly in spoof context) in sourcing an active “Andromeda strain” over the last decade or more.

    If you research the compelling “Varghina, Brazil incident” (1992), effects of an “alien” (evidenced in 6 “public leaked” photographs, but not the movie “held by the Brazilian government” [sic]) integrated into our society (briefly) have been well documented. I would be more concerned about it “cutting out my eyes, for research purposes” though.


  11. Freespirit says:

    ALL Disease and Conditions (Alzheimers for example) are a bodily response to serious and extended lack of one or more nutrients

    What are my qualifications?

    I am a 78 year young Certified Nutritional Consultant and am in Perfect Health.

    I take NO vaccines nor advice from Doctors and still Run 2-3 miles. The “average” life span of Doctors is 58.

    MY father who did and ate, that which most people did and ate, DIED at 72 with crippling Arthritis AND terminal stage Alzheimers.

    • Adair says:

      Is the lack of these nutrients related to Alzheimers the same for all people, or does it vary from person to person?
      Thanking you in advance for your response.

  12. Humble Mann says:

    And its 123 kiss your ass good lie,
    Rob all the accounts poison all the chow, kill us all for your pedophile royalty. Fuck the vets not once but at least twice.
    I pray the creator does not forgive,
    And his angels unmercifully hack all you fucken vermin

    • Humble Mann says:

      White vs Black ,cowboy vs indian
      Jew vs gentile, poor vs rich
      Dems vs Republicans, Christians vs Muslim and big fartma vs homeopathy.
      Its all the plan to keep us hating and not being able ro unite, uniteing is what they are afraid of.
      Let us all love one another for a cause. Ps communism sounds sociable at a glance, after study its sinply terrorism.
      Ok, fine going ro bed

Comments are closed.