The big one: how environmental killing becomes a medical disease

The giant pig farm disaster: a medical hoax and cover story

The full truth has never been told—until now.

by Jon Rappoport

January 18, 2017

(To join our email list, click here.)

“To handle all that [pig-farm feces] waste, farmers in North Carolina use a standard practice called the lagoon and spray field system. They flush feces and urine from barns into open-air pits called lagoons, which turn the color of Pepto-Bismol when pink-colored bacteria colonize the waste. To keep the lagoons from overflowing, farmers spray liquid manure on their fields nearby. The result, says Steve Wing, an epidemiologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, is this: ‘The eastern part of North Carolina is covered with shit’.”National Geographic, 10/30/14

The above quote describes corporate pig farming around the world.

In order to carry out this operation, giant companies like Smithfield have influenced legislators and government-agency officials. Environmental laws and regulations are ignored, or changed. Lawsuits are fought, hammer and tongs.

Here is what Robert F Kennedy Jr. told radio interviewer, Rachel Lewis Hilburn on 6/3/16:

“…a hog produces ten times the amount of fecal waste by weight as a human being, so if you have a facility that has ten thousand hogs in it, it’s producing as much sewage as a city of a hundred thousand people. Smithfield has one plant in Utah—they call it Circle Four Farms—that has a million hogs on it, so it’s producing the same amount of waste as New York City every day.”

Here is Kennedy’s kicker:

“There’s no difference between hog waste and human waste in terms of its danger to human health. They [Smithfield and other giant corporate pig operations] ought to have to have a sewage treatment plant that cleans it up. And yet, if they had to build that sewage treatment plan, it would drive the price of hogs up so that they could no longer function in the marketplace… they ought to have to build sewage treatment facilities but nobody’s making them do that because they have used political clout…”

All right, that’s a bit of background. Now I’m going to shift to the subject of Swine Flu, the phony epidemic of 2009.

Where did it start?

At a Smithfield pig-raising operation in Perote, Mexico; in a village called La Gloria. Smithfield raises 950,000 hogs a year there.

Press reports described outdoor “pig feces lagoons” on the property. When workers began to get sick, the area was sprayed with unknown chemicals. More workers fell ill and died.

Anyone with a basic knowledge of public health could testify that this combination of mind-boggling (non-) sanitation, plus strong germicides, plus other toxic chemicals routinely dumped in the feces lagoons, could and would cause human disease.

In fact, it doesn’t matter which particular germs are present in the mix.

People at the CDC had to be well aware of this. Yet, in 2009, their choice was to rush researchers to the Smithfield operation in La Gloria, Mexico, armed with the unfounded assumption that some novel virus, never before seen, was the culprit, and their job was to take blood samples and discover what the new germ was.

Why? Why assume, when workers who operate in that kind of environment get sick, there is some new disease at work? The symptoms of the workers were not unusual, given the circumstances.

Workers dying in that vat of filth and chemical soup should be expected.

But, up front, based on no evidence, the CDC on-site team was going for a new germ and a new disease, and that’s what they announced they had found. A gullible world, fed by press reports, bought in.

And that’s how the fake epidemic called Swine Flu was launched.

All the focus that could have centered on the highly toxic Smithfield pig operation in La Gloria was diverted.

Diverted to a virus.

H1N1 it was called. The Swine Flu virus.

Suddenly, it was a medical problem. Not an environmental disaster.

It was RE-INVENTED as a medical problem.

If you don’t yet get what I’m pointing out here, imagine this:

You’re living in an old sewage tunnel under a city. You’re surrounded by human excrement and biting insects and fetid waste water and foul air—and when you fall ill, you suddenly see virus-hunting researchers, not haz-mat rescue workers, approach you and take blood samples. Are they crazy?

No, they’re just doing what their bosses tell them to do. Because the CDC is fronting for, and protecting, major corporate agricultural criminals. Because your illness has to be shifted over to a “new disease and a new virus.”

On top of all this, the virus that these “researchers” do find, which, by the way, is in no way proven to cause disease, can be found all over the world. Why? Because it’s been around for a long, long time, and it has never caused any dire condition at all.

This is how the game works.

This is the medical hoax.

In the case of Swine Flu, it gets worse. It turns out that the virus is not so prevalent after all. That is why, in the early autumn of 2009, CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson discovered that the CDC, ignoring its mandate and charter, had secretly stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. You see, the overwhelming percentage of blood samples taken from the most likely Swine Flu patients, when sent to labs for testing, were coming back with no trace of the so-called Swine Flu virus or any other flu virus. CBS put Attkisson’s published report on the shelf and never followed up on it.

Again, the virus as the cause of illness, was the cover story. Intelligence agencies float cover stories on a regular basis. It’s no accident that CDC has a large unit of virus hunters called the Epidemic Intelligence Service.

Right off the top, I can tell you they create disinformation on a scale that must make the CIA jealous.

Graduates of this EIS program, as proudly stated by the CDC, have gone on to occupy key positions in the overall medical cartel: Surgeons General; CDC directors; medical school deans and professors; medical foundation executives; drug-company and insurance executives; state health officials; medical editors and reporters in major media outlets.

It’s a loyal insider’s club. They collaborate to float prime-cut, A-number-one cover stories of extraordinary dimensions. They invent medical reality out of thin air.

Here is a brief excerpt from the CDC’s website, “50 Years of the Epidemic Intelligence Service”:

“In 1951, EIS was established by CDC following the start of the Korean War as an early-warning system against biologic warfare and man-made epidemics. EIS officers selected for 2-year field assignments were primarily medical doctors and other health professionals…who focused on infectious disease outbreaks. EIS has expanded to include a range of public health professionals, such as postdoctoral scientists in statistics, epidemiology, microbiology, anthropology, sociology, and behavioral sciences. Since 1951, approximately 2500 EIS officers have responded to requests for epidemiologic assistance within the United States and throughout the world. Each year, EIS officers are involved in several hundred investigations of disease and injury problems, enabling CDC and its public health partners to make recommendations to improve the public’s health and safety.”

Several hundred investigations a year. An unparalleled opportunity to shape the truth into propaganda. Control of information about disease. Control out in the field, where EIS agents rush to the scene of “outbreaks,” all the way back through the hallowed halls of academia, into the press, into Big Pharma, into the government.

When I say control of information, I mean disinformation. That’s what the EIS is for. They’ve never met a virus they didn’t love, and if they couldn’t find one, they pretended they did.

They front for the medical cartel. And they provide cover for the crimes of mega-corporations. There’s a town where poverty-stricken people are dying, because horrendous pesticides are running into the water supply and soil? No, it’s a virus. There’s a hotel where the plumbing is broken and human waste is getting into all the bathrooms, and they want this hotel to be the epicenter of a new epidemic? No, it isn’t the plumbing, it’s a novel virus never seen before by man. There’s a section of a city where the industrial pollution is driving people over the edge into immune-system failure? No, it’s a virus.

And here’s the capper. Their propaganda is so good most of the EIS people believe it themselves. You don’t achieve that kind of robotic servitude without intense brainwashing. The first installment of the mind-control program is called medical school.

Psy-op and propaganda begin with the virus hunters of the EIS. They control and own the chokepoint of disease research. They blow up their scanty findings into ex-cathedra pronouncements.

And of course, this strengthens the vaccine establishment because, for every virus, there must be a vaccine: the shot in the arm, loaded with toxic chemicals and a variety of germs.

The EIS. The CDC’s band of brothers. The medical CIA.

“Show me vast pig-feces lagoons, and I’ll show you a virus you’ve never heard of before. I’ll protect corporate criminals from here to the moon…”

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

49 comments on “The big one: how environmental killing becomes a medical disease

  1. elliottjab says:

    Hideous… So sad this country has been dealt so many blows at the behest of globalist elites.

    Most of these ‘farms’ ship what’s raised – if not all – overseas too. Really no telling where USA meat products originate.

  2. tomaz050959 says:

    Show me vast pig-feces lagoons, and I’ll show you a virus you’ve never heard of before. I’ll protect corporate criminals from here to the moon…”

  3. arcadia11 says:

    great title. love it.

    and this is what happens to humans when
    they torture and kill other sentient beings.

    have little sympathy for those who suffered
    through their own actions.

    • Joy says:

      arcadia11, I agree with you entirely (which is part of why I will not consume any animal products)!

      In my journey of discovery and imagination, I have come to believe that the ongoing, daily colossal killing machine and heinous treatment of animals is yet another way in which the controllers of the Matrix have been destroying us, physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually. Not only have we completely lost touch with realizing that animals are sentient beings, but we have become numbed to the reality that we are not only participating in this daily holocaust, but that the tortured flesh of terrified animals we consume is poisoning our bodies down to the cellular level. Once I awakened to this reality, I began sensing it all around me…especially in the grocery store.

      Now, as Jon points out, we can all begin to see how all of these strands of the vast spider’s web are connected, and that there is a vast Matrix scheme to kill every living being on this planet at their command. People who have become enslaved to become part of the MSM, governmental agencies, agricultural conglomerates, and pharma are blind and have lost their minds and individuality, and the unknowing, unsuspecting public is fast in tow.

      Thank goodness many of us are awakening! It takes great courage, and a reigniting of imagination and vision, to not only see the truth, but to accept it, no matter how horrible it is. We are experiencing the worst of times on planet Earth, and yet we all can envision a world into being that leaves these dark evils behind!

      This is a beautiful video that I watch at least once a day in my work to imagine a world where animals are no longer considered “products.”

      • Joy says:

        This is a little off-topic, but when I saw it, I had to share! The Piano Guys will be performing at President Trump’s Inauguration, and this song is an anthem to each beautiful, individual, creative, imaginative heart participating in the re-envisioning of our world at this epic moment in history.

      • arcadia11 says:

        thanks for the link, joy. i will watch it now.
        and thanks also to you and bunny for speaking out where it is so desperately needed. for all life.

      • arcadia11 says:

        it takes courage because one must be willing to become that which it tortures or supports the torture of.
        i am so grateful for those who possess and act on that courage. thanks for being one of them –
        way more than i can express in words.


    • Bunny says:

      Thank you..a new born pig is as intelligent as a one year old pigs have the intelligence of five year olds.
      Even if they were not that intelligent they are SENTIENT, they experience emotions and pain just like we do, what humans do to animals is unconscionable/

      • arcadia11 says:

        and the slaughter and culling of humans will not stop until we change the way we treat the sentient beings we feel are less than us. how can it be otherwise?

        as above so below is not mandatory.

        we have been under the dominion of the kakistocracy, who have ‘given us their minds’, for so long that these heinous crimes seem normal and without culpability.
        if it is looked at straight-on people would see that this is the most glaring, horrible example of normalizing the unthinkable.

        the ripple effect of enough people being willing to experience that which they cause for others, would change life on this plane incalculably. immediately. and i feel that is
        exactly what needs to happen now. or we are going nowhere except to our own merited demise.

        • Joy says:

          Some day, everyone will see what you, Bunny, and I see…as well as millions of others…that it is anything but reasonable behavior!

  4. don wleklinski says:

    hotel rooms.legionnaires.hmmm.

  5. middleway says:

    A bit off-subject but,… wasn’t the Smithfield Corporation acquired in 2013/14 by Shuanghui International , a massive Chinese conglomerate? Doesn’t the basic globalist plan bank on the fact that specific environmental laws will vanish once a nation sacrifices its sovereignty?

  6. KarlaAkins says:

    I lived in rural Iowa for a time and the stench was overwhelming. I live in In rural Indiana now and the chickens and hogs suffer here, too. When will people wake up and realize that you are what you eat? Why would you want to eat something that’s been abused? Thanks for this article.

  7. usnveteran says:

    January 18, 2017
    FDA Requests Comments On Documents Related To Certain Biotechnology And Mosquito-Related Products:

    “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released today three documents for public comment about steps the agency is taking to clarify its regulation of certain biotechnology and mosquito-related products.

    The FDA is requesting public comments on a draft revised guidance on the regulation of animals with intentionally altered genomic DNA, including animals produced through the use of genome editing and genetic engineering; a request for comment related to the regulation of foods from plants produced using genome editing technologies; and a draft guidance that clarifies which mosquito-related products FDA regulates and which such products EPA regulates, regardless of whether these mosquito-related products EPA regulates, regardless of whether these mosquito-related products are developed using biotechnology.” …

    {Although I have not read through all the documents, CDC does not appear to have been invited for comment or input. I’m trying to find research concerning the “mosquito-related products”.}

  8. Yes. This post nails it. There are many more cases like this. Why was a VIRUS chosen as the cause? Because if it they claimed it was a bacteria, we might be able to fight it with antibiotics, but it takes much longer, if it is even possible to fight a virus. Thus VIRUS = fear and long term issue.

    When the cure to any disease is health, the disease becomes incurable. No one can sell you a pill for cleaning up the shXt. So it becomes an incurable disease.

  9. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    My research mentor, Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1917-2001), was the first scientist sent to examine the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945:

    Kuroda risked the rest of his life to show that nations and national academies of sciences were united into the UN by frightened world leaders on 24 OCT 1945 to try to save themselves and the world from possible nuclear annihilation by taking totalitarian control of all humanity and hiding the source of energy (E) that Einstein (1905) had discovered and Aston (1922) had confirmed earlier in rest masses (m) of ordinary atoms: E = mc^2

    • artemisix says:

      What does this have to do with the above article? Totalitarian control is the quickest way to destroy large parts of humanity, the BEST thing would to NOT have Nuclear energy or weapons. Or totalitarians.

  10. Jon,

    You know my thoughts on this. I can find no other “acceptable” explanation. Viruses result from the way bodies process extraneous materials (organic or inorganic) that are breathed in. That’s important because it means ALL viruses are “airborne” and ALL are caused by the “environment”. The psyop has been devoted to misdirection to deflect the implication of industrial pollutants (aerosol pesticides included).

    It cannot be stated enough that I sincerely believe the root cause of cancers is petro-chemical pollution, delivered [mostly] by that global network of topically powered motor vehicles. Everyone supported by our polluted atmosphere has the “potential” to develop cancerous tumours (thus, 100% are “cancer developing”). When Kennedy starts touting that, I’ll pick up my ears.

    It is the same [petro-carbon] pollution that is eroding the ozone layer (if anything’s left at all) and NOT CFC’s. The reason the Inuit Eskimos are “cancer free” is the atmosphere over the ice poles somehow purges pollutants (leaving the ozone intact as well).

    The “Draco” (ciakars, who maybe “on the cusp” of our reality bandwidth) allegedly moved they mega city “Agharta” from somewhere under India to about 50 miles in under Antarctica. Are they affected by our pollution “leakage” is the $64 question?


    • lordwindemere says:

      Yes. Hydrocarbons are a well-known carcinogen. The first recorded cases of scrotal cancer was in chimney sweeps in Britain. No Joke.

      Yes, I said scrotal cancer.

      But, there are carcinogens from other sources as well. I think cancer is a mitochondrial defect in respiration. Hydrocarbons can initiate this. The cells revert to a more primitive type of metabolism.

      The AMA has ignored the facts since the truth would only lose them money.

      • @LW

        It’s kinda fairly obvious to me. I mean wouldn’t the wrong type of carbon seriously disrupt a very finely tuned, super-sensitive carbon based like form.

        Thanks for the info BTW. Do a link on that chimney sweep and a detail Victorian (and prior) history?

        • Travis says:

          There is a Wikipedia page on this:

          Chimney Sweep’s Carcinoma.

          I think this was the first time in history that aromatic hydrocarbons were proven to be carcinogenic. This phenomenon is similar to the “Radium Girls”, the watch dial painters that used glow-in-the-dark radioactive paint. Before that, there was not much information on the health effects of radioactive elements. This incident is what led to the creation of OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Association.

          Too bad OSHA wan’t around for the poor chimney sweeps!

          But on a cellular level, I think it kind of works by stealing electrons. I have an article here on it, but I have not read it yet.

          This is a collection of articles by biochemists talking about their own special interests. I read most of these, but the article Cancer and Necrosis Induced Selectively by Hydrocarbons is towards the bottom: page 496.

          The ’60’s were the best time for biomedical research. There was a lot of technology and a lot more public research funding. They almost let the cat out of the bag, but the lying and exploitive AMA succeeded in keeping the truth about cancer obscure. They just feign ignorance of it’s specific nature and keep on pretending to research it.

          But I think we all can understand cancer. There are many good articles online about it if you know where to look. I think Warburg, Koch, and Szent-Gyorgi are the ones to listen too.

          And if you want to know about cardiovascular disease, Linus Pauling and Dr. Rath are the ones to read.

          Maybe something about redox potential. Not every hyrdrocarbon is carcinogenic, and the ones that are, are very similar to the relatively inert ones. These facts will give you a clue about how they work.

          Delocalized π-electrons?

          Molecular conjugation?

          Look at Table II: Methylbenzanthracene was 100% effective at giving mice mammary tumors while benzanthracene was 0% effective.

          Not much difference between these two molecules.

          • Travis says:

            If you don’t want to read the entire article I will give you a quote:

            “Szent-Gyorgi discovered that carcinogenicity or aromatic hydrocarbons is connected with their ability to form charge-transfer complexes with local acceptors donating an electron. Because benzopyrene is devoid of polar functions such as -OH or -NH₂ groups, the only possible bonding of the intact molecule to biological systems is that of a charge-transfer complex formation. But charge transfer alone is not enough to induce cancer, steric factors are involved. […] Our colleague, Dr. Yang, has pointed out that there is a direct increase in carcinogenicity as aromatic hydrocarbons become sterically similar to steroids.”

            And it is know that steroid hormones do promote cancer of the prostate, mammary gland, and uterus.

            This is why Asians have lower cancer rates. They don’t consume hormone-laden dairy products in large amounts regularly like Americans and Brits.

          • @Travis

            I have downloaded the pdf (310 pages) which will take a little time to digest!

            Reading your other comment as well, it seems the body generates natural inhibitors which can also be “interfered with” depending on diet (i.e. high diary fat).

            From the “logical perspective”, anything carbon-related is not only going to cause problems (potentially) for a fine tuned, very delicate “carbon-based” life form, but would also have to be “dealt with” as it might be “part of the body” (carbon)….if that makes sense?

            I think the body contains the “invader” not quite knowing whether it’s good or bad and, sort of, leaves it for a “rainy day”. The problem is it corrupts the RNA/DNA of the cells that hold it in isolation, so more cells come along to try and patch up the problem. They become malignant too and before too long you have a whopping great cancerous tumour.

            The only potential “blocker” might be some kind of hormone or something else that’s tuned to the correct frequency to recognise the problem and deal with it properly without corrupting itself.

            That’s my ‘non-medical” layman’s logic.

            Sound about right?

          • Travis says:

            Well, the molecular geneticists try to explain cancer too. I don’t know if there is anything to that, but they certainly try.

            Genetics as a cause for cancer is favored by the ones who are actually causing it.

            As far as chemicals corrupting the DNA, that is possible. My gut feel is that cancer is a metabolic disease that has little to do with DNA.

            It is somewhat plausible: Chemicals corrupt the DNA leading to the replication of aberrant cells. I just don’t think that Warburg, Szent-Gyorgi, and William Koch were on the right track.

            Willilam Koch had very high success rates! Look up Szent-Gyorgi’s methylglyoxal, Koch’s glyoxylide, and bromopyruvate!

            All of these molecules are similar, they donate electrons to the respiratory chain, and they work!

            I read this study a few months ago:

            This researcher eradicated tumors in all 19 rats with bromopyruvate. THis is full of nice color photographs. He even gives the rats cute names.

            There are Indian researchers who work with Methylglyoxal, you can do a PubMed search and find very promising studies on this compound. Szent-Gyorgi endorsed methylglyoxal and he was one of the greatest molecular biologists in history.

            And Linus Pauling was one of the greatest chemists in history!

            Don’t fall for the Latin spell the Oncologists will try to cast on you! Chemotherapy barely works and theses cheap treatments actually do work, but they are cheap.

            Nobody can make much money on them, so they ignore them and ridicule the practitioners who use them.

            The fact that all of these compounds successfully reverse tumors and they all have an electron-rich carbonyl group, lead me to believe that cancer is an electrical problem with respiration.

            You need the electron transport chain to work. If it does not, then the cell reverts to a more primitive type of metabolism. When a cell divides under this type of metabolism, it does not have enough energy to fully differentiate. This is why cancer cells a morphologically distinct.

            Or something like that. This is the type of angle Szant-Gyorgi takes.

            And we know that those aromatic hydrocarbons are carcinogenic and the only chemical reactions that they can undertake since they lack functional groups is electron redox reactions. This supports the electron-transport chain/cancer hypothesis.

            There i are tons of data on this. I read a bit about it, but just the tip of the iceberg.

            I just did a quick search and found this!

            This is a real shork article by Szent-Gyorgi called: Intermolecular electron transfer may play a major role in biological regulation, defense, and cancer.


          • Travis says:

            I should have proofread that. Sorry for all of the typos.

    • Sue says:

      There are many causes of cancer, and vaccinations are one of those.

      • Spoken with supreme pignorance, Sue. You bake bread with play dough?

        Here’s an analogy (that you won’t understand). There are many causes that create the goldfinch bird, but, ultimately, one mechanism.

        I think you mistake “causes” with TYPES, but how “vaccinations” made your itinerary, God only knows. Vaccines can and will TRIGGER certain cancers and a whole raft of other things will do that too, but there is but ONE CAUSE of cancers as there is but ONE MECHANISM that creates the goldfinch bird.

        • Sue says:

          My, my, your arrogance precedes you. It is obvious that you consider yourself the supreme authority on this (and probably most, if not all, other) subjects(s), but there are quite a few physicians and scientists who do have expressed interpretations which differ from yours. Oh, I know, you don’t have to say it. They are all inferior to you, too.

          • Oh boy, and what about those scientists and physicians that call vaccines “safe”?

            Your case is crumbling as you, well I was going to say “think”, but that’s beyond you.

            It might escaped your attention, but I am a writer, journalist, researcher and profound thinker. I guess I invest 30-80 hours a week, every week into some form of academic research. I say that DOES give me the right to speak out. Call me arrogant, maybe, but are you any different, Sue?

            Yes, you don’t research far and wide. You look and listen to your goggle box, but then a family member falls victim to their bullshit and, miraculously, you turn to Jon Rappoport, as if guided by the spirit world.

            He then becomes your source of “palatable bullshit” by rote, whether he tells the truth or not. The “Jesus” factor. People like you, Sue, have turned this world into the trash can it is. You factionalise ignorance.

            On to causes. Give me an explanation of how vaccines “caused” cancer. What’s your BASIS? Given the mass inoculations began in the mid to late 19th century, why do cancer statistical spikes follow the widespread production and use of petro-chemical products, beginning from 1905 (introductions of the automobile)?

            I am not going to reproduce entire articles I’ve written on the sublet in the comments section here, but I suggest if you rise can rise above “name calling” and bragging posthumous “credentials”, others may well be conned into thinking you can feign intelligence.

          • Sue says:

            Well, you continue to prove me correct in my assessment (and, by the way, who charged out the gate with the colorful insults, right off the bat, in response to to a simple one line sentence? Oh, that would be you).

            You’ve stated a great many assumptions about me, and Jon, for someone who is allegedly a “researcher and profound thinker.” And your self-description certainly does illustrate that you are a legend in your own mind.

            No, I have studied vaccines for many years (35, to be exact) before there was an Internet, and wrote some articles, and then a book, on the subject, which was published in 1993. Also, I have learned which “doctors” and which “scientists” are believable, based on what they say and who/what they represent. I know Jon from when we were both invited to speak at an event, about 23 years ago.

            I’ll give you some information, and then I am finished. You are particularly aggressive, angry, and hateful, so I’ll let you carry on to your heart’s content once I post, and then let others draw their own conclusions.

            1909 New York Press, January 26,1909 publishes a report by W.B. Clark which states, “cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. I have seen 200 cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

            Dr. Supperrat, Chief doctor at St. Louis Hospital said, concerning the anti-diphtheria and anti-smallpox vaccine: “It produces an explosion of leukemia.”

            “It is necessary only to read on the dials of a physical measuring apparatus the ratings of the 3 characteristics of the blood. The pH, the rH2, and the electric resistance. The Findings are that all vaccination has the effect of directing the three values of the blood into or toward the zone characteristics of cancer and leukemia. Vaccines do predispose to cancer and leukemia.” – Prof. L.C. Vincent, founder of Bioelectronics

            “The third case was a 5-year-old boy with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, whom I happened to see in August of 1978, while visiting an old friend and mentor, a family physician with over 40 years’ experience. Well out of earshot of the boy and his parents, he told me that the leukemia had first appeared following a DPT vaccination, that he had treated the child successfully with natural remedies on two previous occasions, when the blood picture improved dramatically, and the liver and spleen shrank down to almost normal size, but that full relapse had occurred soon after each DPT booster.” Richard Moskowitz, M.D.

            “Without going into technical detail on this subject it is, nevertheless, important to show the relationship of the lymphatic glands to vaccinal cancer. The lymph vessels form a fine network that interpenetrates the connective tissue and covers the entire body. The continuity of these lymph vessels “is interrupted by interposed nodular aggregations of lymph tissue which are known as lymph glands.” (Textbook of Anatomy — Cunningham) One of the functions of the lymph glands is to filter the poisons from circulation before they reach the cells. When an excess of poison is generated in the body or is introduced from the outside as in vaccination, the lymph glands become enlarged in an effort to collect and hold in abeyance, the accumulation of poison. A protective coating of tissue is formed around the gland to protect the body from collected poisons. It is this wonderful defense mechanism that the body provides against the ignorance and willfulness of the individual, that the doctors attack as an enemy. They call it a wild growth of tissue — a cancer or tumor.” E. McBean PhD, ND, introducing the following information from J. Morrison, MD:

            Dr. J. Morrison, former Professor of Chemistry and Toxicology in the Medical Department of the National University at Washington, D. C., formerly a member of the Medical Council and Examiner in the College of Physicians and Surgeons, (Ontaria, Canada):

            “Cancer can only attack the organs and tissues moderately or abundantly supplied by the lymphatic circulation . . . Therefore, cancer is a disease of the lymphatic system “per Se” in the same sense that tuberculosis is regarded as a disease of the lungs or respiratory system.”
            Two well-known causes of this fatal malady are, (1) nicotine (tobacco) poisoning and (2) vaccination, which is certainly the most prolific cause of both external and internal cancer. . . Vaccine virus poisons the lymphatic system, impairs its function and lays the foundation for internal cancer, for which there has hitherto been no (successful medical) treatment or relief.”

            Vaccine Injection site cancers:
            Castrow and Williams, “Basal-Cell Epithelioma Occurring in a Smallpox Vaccination Scar”, J Derm Surg, 2:2, May 1976, p 15-19

            Dorsey, et al, “Skin Cancer in Smallpox Vaccination Scars”, Ca Med, Vol 92, No 5, May 1960, p 353-354.
            Goncalves, J C A, “Malignant Change in Smallpox Vaccination Scars”, Arch Derm, Vol 93, Feb 1966, p 229- 230.

            Hazelrigg, DE, “Basal Cell Epithelioma in a Vaccination Scar”, Int J Derm, Nov 1978, 17(9): 723-725.
            Marmelzat, et al, “Malignant Melanomas in Smallpox Vaccination Scars”, Arch Derm, Vol 89, June 1964, p 823- 826.
            Marmelzat, WL, “Malignant Tumors in Smallpox Vaccination Scars: A Report of 24 Cases”, Arch Derm (Chic), Apr 1968, 97:400-406.
            Morman, R, et al, “Dermatofibroscaroma Protuberans Arising in a Site of Multiple Immunizations”, Arch Derm, Vol 115, Dec 1979, p 1453.

            Lokich, J J, “Malignant Melanoma Arising de novo Within a BCG Scarification Site”, Lancet, Feb 8, 1975, 1 (7902):331-332.

            Cancer is just a tiny tip of the iceberg.

            And, by the way, the words “trigger” and “cause” are synonyms in a thesaurus. But I’ll bet you are smarter than those folks, too.

          • I see what’s going on here. When “generalities” don’t work, then any “label” will do. Ever heard of term “guilt by association” Sue? If you haven’t. Look it up. You LIVE IT. Hey, get into politics. You don’t even need “facts” to succeed there.

            I chose “Lies, damned lies and statistics”, because if you take a wide enough survey you can “prove” just about anything. I have never mentioned Starfield, for instance, in any of my articles. What she says is undeniably relevant, but HOW relevant?

            You go and skew the facts to twist your miserable little crusade, Sue. I’ll stick to logic. In isolation vaccines don’t CAUSE cancer nor ever will do. They, in combination with a number of factors, can trigger a reaction in cellular DNA/RNA leading to cancer. Semantics are everything in an honest world.

            I am very impressed by the work of late Otto Warburg. I believe he’s onto something. So with cancer there are 3 concentric cause/affect cycles. Underlying is carbon pollution (organic or otherwise), innumerable catalysts/triggers can affect a cycle which can only be brought into being in the correct body environment.

            Then there’s the mind….powerful indeed when you understand it (which “science” doesn’t remotely).

          • Figglesworth says:

            Give her a break Ozzie.

            There was this one compound in vaccines implicated in cancer. I forgot what it is.

            If you accept the concept of the carcinogen, then you must accept the possibility of a carcinogen in some vaccines.

            This is not to say that all vaccines are carcinogenic. I just don’t think it’s fair to dismiss the idea with the amount of prejudice you are displaying.

          • Sue says:

            Vaccines are Carcinogens: Avoid them at all Costs

          • I’m sorry to say but SHE STARTED IT with the open ended statement:

            “Vaccines cause cancer”. I still insist then don’t cause cancer, but can trigger responses in the body. So, no, I won’t “give it a rest”.

  11. Sue says:

    “Until he extends the circle of his compassion to all living things, man will not, himself, know peace.” – Dr. Albert Schweitzer

  12. Dan says:

    I haven’t eaten pork in like 10+ years. Pigs are disgusting animals. They will eat anything and roll around in their own sh*t. They might not be that bad in the wild, or small scale farms, but pack them together in a closed space and it’s the nastiest thing you can imagine. Factory hog farms are an environmental catastrophe. Then on the other end, you get bureaucrats like Michigan Dept of Natural Resources actively killing and destroying any independent small scale pig farming operations and declaring wild pigs an invasive species. Total tyranny and total garbage.

    • Sue says:

      The only disgusting animals on the planet are homo-sapiens. Feeling superior and entitled, while destroying natural resources, torturing and murdering the other animals with wild abandon, polluting the planet beyond repair, and then scapegoating on non-“humans.”

  13. NRGcycle says:

    Pay an artist $150 for a diagram of that whole thing.

  14. Bunny says:

    IF YOU TRULY WANT TO KICK THE ONE PERCENT IN THE NUTS, if you want to take this country back, SWITCH YOUR DIET..switch to local plant based whole foods. You will save money by not having to go to the doctor, fewer colds and diseases,you will save yourself pain and suffering, you will be helping to “save the planet”,you will be cutting off major profit for the big boys in all areas, even if you do not give a fig about helpless defenseless animals being tortured and brutalized , at least be selfish enough to do it for your own health.

    • Joy says:

      Thank you, Bunny!

    • arcadia11 says:

      lol. wonderful advice. and who wouldn’t want to kick the one percent in the nuts?
      it’s win-win.

    • artemisix says:

      I wish this were true. I was vegan for 20 years and have yet to see results. Organic free range would probably have kept me from getting diabetes. One diet is not suitable for everyone. Family farms can do it with no cruelty. Just have to use your imagination.

      • lordwindemere says:

        Was it raw and low-fat?

      • Travis says:

        How can meat prevent diabetes? Heme iron (blood) and fat are both strongly associated with diabetes. The absorption of non-heme Iron from plants is regulated, but too much heme iron can cause iron-overload. This is implicated in diabetes.

        If you doubt Sir Lord Windemere, do a Pubmed search on heme-iron and diabetes. You will find so many studies that it would take years to read them all.

        Fat has also been implicated. Too much dietary fat prevents cells from uptaking sugar, since they have to burn fat instead. This may seem paradoxical, but it is true. High-fat and high-sugar together is a recipe for diabetes.

    • Sunshine says:

      Yes! Already doing just that. I reached the end of the line. I’m not buying what the grocery store is selling. Not buying what MSM is selling, or “health care” or any of their crazy and dangerous mining for cancer exams. I’m voting for change with my dollars. Hopefully more people will figure it out and do the same.

  15. mrcamillon says:

    They American federal government can make a mountan of an ant hill every were they go.

  16. Laura says:

    “But, bacon!” Those with feces saturated brains will pipe up with. Great article. I’m vegan so no one can blame the manure lagoons on us. Additionally, during the swine flu “epidemic” healthcare workers largely rejected the swine flu vaccine for themselves…about 88% of them, so apparently they were in on the scam along with their bosses, since most of them still pushed the vaccine on patients. But then their bosses cracked down on them and much more often stopped giving them the choice to opt out of vaccines. What an insane asylum this world is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *