Staged reality of the medical cartel

Staged reality of the medical cartel

by Jon Rappoport

August 23, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

“The suffering of people is all too real, but predators lay a grid of fake reality over it, and make billions of dollars—while they simultaneously avoid paying out billions of dollars as a result of law suits.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

“Muhammad Ali has ‘Parkinsonism?’ Nonsense. He has ‘Hit Too Many Times by Joe Frazier Damage.’ This isn’t a disease or a disorder.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Let’s say there are a lot of people who take hammers and hit children over the head with them.

The connection between the hammer blows and the damage couldn’t be more obvious. Hammer-blow; skull; damage.

But now, researchers and pharmaceutical companies come up with an idea: “Let’s take this trend and create, cook up, invent, fabricate a new mental disorder—let’s name it Regressive Disorientation Disorder. RDD.”

And so they do.

They define it by listing symptoms: disorientation lasting more than three months; speech difficulty; inattention; memory loss; diminishment of motor skills.

Is there a test that defines RDD? Of course not. How could there be? Blood test, urine test, brain scan, genetic assay? No. No test will actually define RDD.

Because RDD doesn’t exist.

Damage exists.

The only definition of RDD is the cooked-up symptoms.

But…these symptoms create a wide net. People who’ve been in auto accidents, who’ve fallen from buildings, who’ve gotten hurt playing football, who’ve boxed—all these people show “the symptoms of RDD.”

Now, some independent researcher comes along and says, “I’ve found out that a lot of the children who are being diagnosed with RDD were actually hit over the head with hammers.”

That’s all he says. Simple.

This causes a firestorm. Why? Because pharmaceutical companies are selling drugs to treat RDD and they’re working on a vaccine to prevent it. They’ve got a fantastic money-making scheme going.

The researchers, who invented the label RDD, don’t want to admit that people hitting kids over the head with hammers is what they’re really pontificating about.

So the researchers carry out a study using 2000 kids who fit the list of “RDD symptoms.”

And lo and behold, they find some kids who were never hit over the head with hammers.

Well, naturally, they would. They had set up the loose criteria for diagnosis of (non-existent) RDD in the first place. That wide net dragged in kids who were hurt playing football, who were in car crashes, and so on.

And then the researchers say: “See? We told you so. Hammers hitting kids on the head isn’t the cause of RDD. Because many kids with RDD never got hit on the head with a hammer. Case closed.”

The researchers don’t stop there. They go on to say: “RDD is one mental disorder. One distinct disorder. It must have one cause. One disorder, one cause. We don’t know what that cause is yet, but we’re working on it. We’re making progress. We need more money. We’ve found some very interesting genetic factors…”

Meanwhile, back in reality: hammer hits child on the head. Damage.

Or: vaccine injected into child. Fever, screaming, withdrawal from the world. Everything changes drastically and tragically for the child. Damage.

The Matrix Revealed

But when a parent goes to the federal compensation bureaucrats—because she isn’t allowed to sue the vaccine manufacturer directly—and puts in a request for money, so she can take care of her child for the rest of his life…

And if she boldly and truthfully says, “My boy was damaged by a vaccine”…

She gets this—watch carefully, this is the shell game: “Well, Mrs. Smith, it’s not enough to say your son was damaged by a vaccine. No, no, no, no. You must prove that he contracted a disorder or a disease with a recognized official label. Then we can decide whether the vaccine did, or could, cause such a disorder.”

What??

Welcome to the labyrinth.

“My son was hit on the head with a hammer and damaged.”

“Well, Mrs. Smith, that’s not enough. You have to prove your boy has a recognized disorder or disease with a certified label—and then we will turn around and decide whether that disorder was caused or could be caused by a hammer.”

“Look,” the desperate mother says. “Just give me a label for an official disorder. Some label you agree can be caused by a hammer on the head, and I’ll find a doctor who will diagnose my child with it.”

“Oh, I’m sorry. That would be fraud. You have to keep guessing what we’ll do and hope you guess right…”

This process is called government justice, fairness, concern, and science.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

What CDC whistleblower William Thompson needs to do now

What CDC whistleblower William Thompson needs to do now

by Jon Rappoport

August 22, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

(Note: All posts related to this story are archived here under #Vaccinegate.)

I’m putting this together from bits and pieces of information I’m getting from various sources.

William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, who apparently can torpedo the CDC with his inside information about a falsified vaccine study, is cut off from outside help—except for his lawyer.

I hope that lawyer knows the kind of danger his client is in.

If the CDC’s position that the MMR vaccine has no connection to autism is shredded, the whole corrupt vaccine empire experiences an earthquake.

And purportedly, that is exactly what Thompson can cause.

And the CDC knows this.

The people who have gradually brought Thompson out of the shadows (*), trying to help him see he needs to blow the whistle—those people are out of the equation at the moment.

(*) (See the short documentary video by Autism Media Channel here on vimeo.com — entitled “CDC Whistleblower revealed”).

The situation has escalated beyond their ability to control it. This is no longer an orderly process.

So Thompson quite possibly feels he has no allies, unless he retracts everything he’s been implying about CDC corruption. Unless, perhaps, he makes some sort of statement about “personal problems,” “pressure at work,” and so on, and claims that people have taken his criticisms of the CDC in the wrong way and have misunderstood him.

If he tries, in this fashion, to rebuild his connections to the CDC and re-enlist as a good soldier, he might—if permitted—enter a realm of silence, retire soon, and hope the promise of a pension is to be trusted.

He would essentially disappear off the map of controversy about autism, vaccines, falsified studies, and CDC corruption.

On the other hand, he actually has thousands of people out there who would like to help him speak the truth and do what they can to protect him.

He should know this.

He also needs to know that suspicions will remain about him, about his motives, about his prior anonymous confessions of guilt, about his making contact with people from the truth-telling vaccine community at large.

Did he initiate this contact with the intention of trapping them and working some kind of operation?

As bizarre as this sounds, it can’t be dismissed entirely unless and until he comes clean.

His mistake was standing in half-light and half-shadow, and coming out half-way. That’s a bad, bad place to occupy.

He’ll never have a responsible job with a government agency or corporation again. All that is over. But so what? Given his specific revelations about CDC corruption, why would he want any of that?

Assuming he still has the freedom to contact people who are on the correct side of this monumental issue and scandal…do it. Do it now.

He’ll find a portal into many more people and much help.

Yes, the fantasy of an orderly process of revelation may be gone, but that doesn’t mean the battle is lost.

William Thompson is in a tough spot—but how does it compare with the position of children who have suffered the terrible brain-damaging effects of vaccines?

And if, as he has said, he contributed to that tragedy by intentionally falsifying a study that should have shown the damage the MMR vaccine has done…how much introspecting does he need to engage in, in order to know what is right?

I hope he is not yet under some form of house arrest. I hope he can do what is right.

Whether he can gain whistleblower status and subsequent protection from legal attacks is, from my understanding, a complex question. The laws are vague on certain points.

He can be sure that, when it comes to medical whistleblowing, the feds will do everything they possibly can to block him from legal sanctuary.

As I’ve already pointed out in prior articles, ops can be mounted against him that have nothing to do with the law. “He’s mentally ill. He’s in treatment.” “He committed suicide.” All the more reason for him to stand up and reach out.

As I’ve documented a number of times in these pages, Thompson’s employer, the CDC, is a group of terminally foul liars who have been deceiving the American public and causing great harm, since their inception.

They need to suffer—not simply as payback—but because they continue their criminal ways.

There are still many people who blithely believe the medical establishment is making great progress in curing the brain damage labeled “autism.” For such people, it’s all about “finding genetic factors” and “chemical imbalances.”

They discount entirely the idea that vaccine-caused trauma/damage is one major and direct cause, among others.

They believe the spoon-fed propaganda they receive on the news. They believe the outraged experts who bray about the “anti-vaccine forces.”

What about a vaccine manufacturer who admits his own product has significant dangers?

power outside the matrix

Let’s take one. Sanofi Pasteur, of Swiftwater, Pennsylvania.

The vaccine is Tripedia. It’s a combo vaccine for Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis. Generic name: DTaP.

I’m quoting from the company’s own product information sheet, dated December 2005. (Upper case caps are copied exactly from the product sheet.)

Page 6: “SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRIPEDIA VACCINE IN INFANTS BELOW SIX WEEKS OF AGE HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED…THIS VACCINE IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PERSONS 7 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER…Tripedia vaccine is NOT indicated for adults.”

Something could go terribly wrong in all these age groups, but magically, if you’re between the age of six weeks and seven years, you’re fine. Just fine.

Page 11: “Adverse events reported during post-[FDA] approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [bleeding disorder], SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis [potentially serious bacterial skin infection], autism, convulsion/grandmal convulsion, encephalopathy [‘global brain dysfunction’], hypotonia [decreased muscle tone—‘rag-doll’ infants], neuropathy [peripheral nerve damage], somnolence and apnea.”

SIDS. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Grandmal convulsion. Nerve damage. Bleeding disorder.

And autism.

Autism.

Here is a very interesting quote from Harris Coulter, the co-author of A Shot in the Dark: Why the P in the DPT vaccination may be hazardous to your child’s health (see also this book list):

“Vaccination programs were instituted in the late 1930s… In the 1940s a new mental syndrome, which Dr. Leo Kanner called autism, was noted. It appeared in the wake of the U.S. pertussis vaccine schemes. [Pertussis is one component of the DPT vaccine.]

“When vaccination programs were expanded after the war, the number of autistic children increased greatly… (When) the U.S. occupied Japan and forcibly vaccinated the children: their first case of autism was diagnosed in 1945.

“In England the [pertussis] shot was subject to large scale promotion in the late fifties: a society for autistic children was founded in 1962.

“In the U.S. at first the malady [autism] was noticed in higher income families. This was before the free or forced pertussis vaccine programmes; only the better-off parents could afford the ‘latest medical advance’…later parents from across the socio-economic spectrum gained equal access… Thus, autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Breaking: CDC whistleblower Thompson in grave danger now

Breaking: CDC whistleblower Thompson in grave danger now

by Jon Rappoport

August 22, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

(Note: All posts related to this story are archived here under #Vaccinegate.)

William W Thompson, PhD…the CDC whistleblower…was escorted off the premises of the CDC campus yesterday afternoon. This is what a source has just told me.

Therefore, the CDC knows Thompson is the whistleblower.

He’s in danger.

I’ve also been told that the Autism Media Channel (autismmediachannel.com), which had posted the video revealing Thompson’s name and outing him, is gone. The site is suddenly gone. (AMC’s documentary video is here on vimeo.com — entitled “CDC Whistleblower revealed”).

Threats of various kinds, at the very least, will now be applied to Thompson. Legal action, perhaps arrest, perhaps worse.

When it comes to vaccines and protecting that empire, the games are very serious. Deadly serious. The gloves come off.

People have to understand this, if Thompson disappears or shows up dead “as a suicide.”

Since Thompson isn’t, as of this moment, stepping forward himself to provide full disclosure on his past actions, and since his name is already out there….the best protection he has is other people.

Other people making his name and his dangerous situation known. That has to happen now.

William W Thompson, PhD

William W Thompson, PhD — via ‘Google Scholar’ search.

Prior to this morning, Thompson had been standing in the shadows as an anonymous source, admitting that he cooked data to hide a connection between autism and the MMR vaccine.

Now other things are known. In 2007, he published a study on the effects of mercury (thimerosal) on babies and very young children—and he concluded that there were both positive and negative effects, but the effects on both sides were very small.

The study was used by the press and the government to trumpet the idea (the lie) that everybody could rest easy; vaccines containing mercury weren’t harming anyone.

Now, this, too, comes under scrutiny. If Thompson was lying about the MMR vaccine, did he also lie about mercury and its toxic effects? Did he intentionally underplay those effects? Did he cook the data in that study, too?

Thompson has been working at NCIR, the CDC’s National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases—until yesterday.

NCIR includes, in its mission statement, the following: “prevention of disease, disability, and death through immunization…” In other words, it’s a PR agency that promotes vaccines. Actual science about vaccine dangers would be cut off at the pass.

Thompson is looked at as a threat to this agenda.

His unwillingness to come all the way forward, speak his name, tell the whole truth has boomeranged on him. Predictable.

Psychiatric detention and drugging, threats of lawsuits for violating “confidentiality agreements,” arrest, “you’ll never get a job again,” and “sudden suicide” are all possibilities.

Shining a very bright light on Thompson and his situation is his best hope now.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

CDC whistleblower revealed: William Thompson

CDC whistleblower revealed: William Thompson

by Jon Rappoport

August 22, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

(Note: All posts related to this story are archived here under #Vaccinegate.)

This is a quick one. The Autism Media Channel has posted a short video in which the whistleblower is named: William W. Thompson, PhD. (AMC’s documentary video is here on vimeo.com — entitled “CDC Whistleblower revealed”).

He was in fact one of the authors of the 2004 De Stefano study that has been accused of hiding true data linking the MMR vaccine to autism.

Thompson once worked for Merck.

Questions abound. Does Thompson know his name has been released? Was it done with his permission? Is he going come forward and make a statement?

William W Thompson, PhD

William W Thompson, PhD — via ‘Google Scholar’ search.

More to come…

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Advice for the secret CDC vaccine whistleblower

by Jon Rappoport

August 21, 2014

(To join our email list, click here.)

I have been writing about the CDC research scientist who may be about to step out of the shadows and reveal himself—

He was, a decade ago, part of the CDC team who suppressed data showing a clear connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

If he comes clean now, he will expose deep crimes of the CDC. He will torpedo the ship.

To succeed, he has to be strong. He has had ten years to consider how to go public.

Express his own shame, remorse, and regret? Yes.

But he mustn’t let his remorse make him so weak he can’t tell the truth in the forthright way the truth deserves.

And he has to say everything he knows. The specifics. Names, dates, places, publications, lies. He has to describe exactly who ordered the suppression of the facts, who said the vaccine was safe when it was a loaded weapon.

The untold number of parents and their autistic children who were assaulted and damaged by vaccines deserve all that.

If the CDC had told the truth about vaccine-damage all along, many lives would have been saved, not destroyed.

Repeat: If the CDC had told the truth about vaccine-damage all along, many lives would have been saved, not destroyed.

I don’t know how well acquainted this whistleblower is with basic facts about vaccine damage, beyond his specialized area. He ought to learn a few things, in order to understand the true scope of the disaster and the tragedy and the crime.

Perhaps it will help him bolster his courage, knowing the importance of his new mission.

Let’s start here. “Statistics Report, March 5, 2014” (source: hrsa.gov: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program). This is a compilation of US government compensation payouts to people who have been damaged by vaccines. It’s published by the US Department of Health and Human Services / Health Resources and Services Administration.

Chart III: From 1988 to 2014, the US government has paid out $2,857,926,807.60 in compensation. $2.8 billion.

Keep in mind that many people who have been damaged by vaccines have never contacted the federal compensation program at all. Others have engaged in the long, arduous, and frustrating process, only to give up in midstream.

So the true figure on what the federal government would and should have paid out by now is much higher than $2.8 billion.

Every dollar represents physical and mental vaccine destruction.

How many people in America are severely injured and damaged by vaccines every year?

If we listen to the sold-out experts, we come away thinking: very few.

But the truth is, there is no reliable accounting. There is no reliable system for assessment.

The reference here is “In the Wake of Vaccines,” by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.

Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damage—actual figures are not available or carefully tracked or vetted. In other words, the system for reporting adverse effects is broken.

Fisher: “But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination?

“Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]

“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.

“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, “Vaccine safety,” Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]

“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”

1.2 million.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

What government agency should be making a titanic effort to do the (honest) research on the true extent of vaccine damage?

The CDC.

That’s their central job. Counting numbers.

That’s who the secret vaccine whistleblower works for, right now.

If he steps out of shadows, he should understand the extent of his employer’s betrayal of the American people, when its spokespeople say, over and over again, that vaccines are uniformly safe and effective.

He should understand that, and it should give him strength.

Go public NOW. The whole truth, revealed immediately, is his best protection.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Vaccine-autism connection: US Congressman stonewalled by the CDC

by Jon Rappoport

August 21, 2014

(To join our email list, click here.)

With a CDC whistleblower standing in the shadows, claiming the CDC has known about the vaccine-autism connection for 10 years, the cover-up is threatening to blow sky-high.

And now Florida Congressman Bill Posey has sent me a statement about his experience with the CDC.

Posey has been trying to obtain specific data about a 2004 CDC study which claimed the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine has no role in causing autism.

The CDC whistleblower (so far, anonymously) has been pointing to that 2004 study as a fraud, claiming vital data were omitted, data which would indict the vaccine.

So how has the CDC responded to Posey’s inquiry and request for all the 2004 data?

Here is what he wrote to me:

“The CDC has refused for more than six months to hand over documents I requested concerning this issue. That is not the type of response we expect from our government.”

What??

A US Congressman wants research data from a federal agency and they flat-out refuse.

Nothing much is a stake here—only the health of the entire US population. Vaccines causing autism? And the CDC has the right to keep as many secrets as it wants to?

Did the CDC wake up one morning and decide it’s the CIA? On what grounds is it refusing to release the data? National Security?

Here is what the CDC whistleblower (a research scientist still employed by the CDC) states: intentionally omitted data from the 2004 study shows that: African-American boys who receive their first MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months have a 300% increased risk of developing autism.

Presumably, this is what Congressman Posey would learn if the CDC turned over the data to him.

And who knows what else he would learn?

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

My comment about the CDC thinking it’s the CIA isn’t entirely facetious. In 1987, I confirmed that, routinely, certain CDC employees are sent to Langley, Virginia, for CIA training, and return with top-secret classifications—meaning they can access data that are off-limits to the rest of the CDC and most of the federal government.

Data confirming extensive and ongoing damage caused by vaccines might indeed rate as “classified, National Security,” if by Security you mean “protecting vaccine manufacturers and their government allies.”

As opposed to protecting the public.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Do we have a “medical Edward Snowden?”

by Jon Rappoport

August 20, 2014

(To join our email list, click here.)

Update: US Congressman stonewalled by the CDC:

As I get ready to post this article, I have a reply to a request I made to Florida Congressman Bill Posey. I asked for a statement regarding the growing charge that the CDC is covering up an autism-vaccine connection. Here is what Congressman Posey has to say on this subject:

“When it comes to our children, we must make sure that any intervention is as safe as possible, including vaccinations. Scientific integrity is a key component to giving that assurance. I will continue to press for a full understanding of the evidence in this situation. The CDC has refused for more than six months to hand over documents I requested concerning this issue. That is not the type of response we expect from our government.”

Congressman stonewalled. He asked the CDC for data and the CDC refused. Refusal=something to hide.

Why else would the CDC ignore Posey’s request? What right does the CDC have to conceal data about vaccines and autism?

In my previous article today, I highlighted a secret CDC whistleblower, who has anonymously asserted that the CDC intentionally covered up the vaccine-autism connection for a decade.

In the last few hours, I’ve discovered a few facts about him.

He is a research scientist.

Surprisingly, he still works for the CDC.

He is seriously considering coming forward soon, revealing his name, and speaking to the press.

The CDC hasn’t yet contacted him to explain himself, hasn’t yet fired him or taken any action against him.

But the CDC undoubtedly knows who he is. It’s no mystery. From what this whistleblower has revealed so far, the CDC would easily be able to identify him.

The whistleblower knows this.

He has an attorney. It’s not clear whether he can obtain whistleblower status and protection.

I urge him to come forward, reveal his name, and talk. I urge him to tell everything he knows. The public needs to hear his evidence.

And at this point, his best protection is disclosure. Stand up. Tell the whole truth.

There are other researchers at the CDC who would be severely impacted by his disclosure. Like the whistleblower, they covered up the vaccine-autism connection. Unlike him, they haven’t admitted it.

If this CDC scientist steps forward into the light, he could cause a firestorm. The CDC would immediately, of course, reject his claims.

They would say something like this: “Yes, it’s true that, ten years ago, we studied autism and the MMR vaccine, but the whole thrust and pattern of the data we compiled had to be considered, not just one piece. We did look at all the data, and we reached the correct conclusion. There is no evidence that the MMR vaccine causes autism.”

The CDC would count on their allies in the press to swallow this statement whole and treat the story as a minor blip on the radar.

They would count on their allies to ignore what the whistleblower is actually saying: that in a CDC 2004 study, a whole raft of significant and damning data was thrown out and ignored, thus making it seem there was no vaccine-autism connection.

It’s also quite possible that the CDC will try to personally discredit the whistleblower, through character attacks. Is he ready for this? Will he stand up to it?

He needs to come forward now, to allay any suspicion that he was prepped to release false information as if it were true, and then ensnare vaccine critics.

In this vicious game, anything is possible.

Half-admissions won’t carry the day. Half-light and half-shadow won’t work.

If he can deliver the goods in person, for all to see, the resulting scandal would travel up into the highest reaches of the CDC, hitting executives who have served there for the past 10 years.

It could move higher into the Department of Health and Human Services, and even the Congress and the White House, present and past.

And then there are the vaccine manufacturers. They too would face very specific questions.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Having written on these matters for many years, I’m not under the delusion that major heavy hitters would do jail time.

But once the match is lit, you never know what will happen.

The CDC has insisted, time after time, that they’ve proved vaccines have nothing to do with autism.

But out in the land of the Web, there are thousands and thousands of people who know better and can speak and write the truth.

It’s up to him now.

If as reported, he feels great shame and remorse for covering up the damning data and contributing to much human harm and damage, he has an option.

He can pull himself together, say his name, say what he knows, down to the last detail, and say who at the CDC insisted that lies be told.

He can burn down all those lies.

He can break through and acquaint the public with what it’s like to hear the truth from a government-agency employee.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Breaking: MMR vaccine, autism, CDC coverup

by Jon Rappoport

August 20, 2014

(To join our email list, click here.)

Sources: Age of Autism, Focus Autism Foundation—

Age of Autism 8/18 article: “Senior government scientist breaks 13 years’ silence on CDC’s vaccine-autism fraud.”

CDC research scientist comes forward, anonymously, comes clean, tells Dr. Brian Hooker that the CDC has known about the MMR vaccine connection to autism for at least 11 years.

Has known, and has intentionally covered it up.

The CDC and the US government have gone to extreme lengths to assert there is no vaccine-autism connection.

This CDC scientist has spoken with Brian Hooker, a PhD in biochemical engineering, many times.

Hooker states he has seen raw CDC data not included in any study. And the data show that:

African-American boys who receive their first MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine before the age of 36 months have a 300% increased risk for autism.

If this is true, what else is the CDC hiding?

From the Age of Autism article (8/18): “Dr. Hooker has worked closely with the CDC whistleblower, and he viewed highly sensitive documents related to the [fraudulent government] study via Congressional request from U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The CDC documents from Congress and discussions that Hooker had with the whistleblower reveal widespread manipulation of scientific data and top-down pressure on CDC scientists to support fraudulent application of government policies on vaccine safety.”

If all this is true, then the CDC has stood by for the last decade and done nothing, while the MMR vaccine has damaged the brains of many, many children.

You may recall that Dr. Andrew Wakefield pointed out a likely connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. British authorities and the CDC destroyed his career.

Wakefield now states: “Over a decade ago, Dr. Scott Montgomery and I put forward a hypothesis for MMR vaccine and autism: the age you receive the vaccine influences the risk. …We shared this hypothesis with vaccine officials, members of the Centers for Disease Control, at meetings in Washington, D.C. and Cold Spring Harbor. A group of senior vaccine safety people at the CDC studied it. It panned out. We were right–at least partly. By Nov 9, 2001, nearly thirteen years ago, senior CDC scientists knew that the younger age exposure to MMR was associated with an increased risk of autism. In 2004 they published, but they hid the results. …”

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

There is another angle on all this. It has to do with how diseases and disorders are labeled and defined.

There is no definitive test for autism. The criteria for diagnosis are a menu of behaviors. Therefore, we are looking at a wide net which includes all sorts of brain and neurological damage.

Official studies are done which “show” that some cases of what’s called autism are not preceded by vaccination—and therefore, vaccines couldn’t be “the single cause of the single disease called autism.”

That proof, of course, is completely false—because what’s called autism isn’t a single disease. It’s neurological damage, which can have a number of causes.

And now we are looking at one of those causes: the MMR vaccine.

If in the coming days, the CDC claims they’ve already eliminated the possibility that vaccines are the cause of autism, you’ll understand their shell game, their con, their ruse.

They’ve stacked the deck, so they can roll out so-called cases of autism which have no connection to the MMR vaccine.

It’s hoax by labels and semantics.

While vaccines continue to damage the brains of children.

(This story continues here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

My prediction about Facebook came true

My prediction about Facebook came true

by Jon Rappoport

August 19, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

Two years ago, I wrote about the origins of Facebook. The company had gone public with its IPO, which was tanking badly.

Here are key excerpts from the article:

“But now the Facebook stock has tanked. On Friday, August 17, [2012] it weighed in at half its initial IPO price. For the first time since the IPO, venture-capital backers were legally permitted to sell off their shares, and some did, at a loss.”

“This has the earmarks of a classic shakeout and squeeze play…First, they [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize the public and even semi-insiders. As the stock continues to tank, they quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot it up all the way to new highs and win big.”

*** “The company is too important as a data-mining asset of the intelligence community to let it fall into disrepair and chaos.”

“The media will play along, pretending the eventual upswing-recovery of Facebook stock happens for fundamental reasons connected to the company’s ‘better level of performance’. The media take this approach to every stock and every company, to avoid letting the public know how massive manipulation actually runs these trading markets.”

Okay. So let’s look at what’s happened to Facebook stock since I wrote those words two years ago.

From August 2012 all the way to July 2013, the stock presented a quite discouraging picture. It stayed in the 20-30 range, looked like it was going nowhere, and never threatened to move up to its original offering price of 40.

Exactly. This prompted many holders to dump their shares, affording insiders the opportunity to scoop them up at bargain-basement prices.

Finally, in July 2013, the insiders began the long march upward, which has continued to this day. As I write this, Facebook stock is selling at $75.39 a share, a new high.

Perfect.

power outside the matrix

Analysts, of course, attribute this boom to company “earnings beating projections.”

They always find a reason. They’ll say anything. “The weather last year was unusually cold.”

The fact is, Facebook was in good hands all the way. The heavy hitters took the price way down, kept it there, accumulated many, many shares, and then marched the price up to the sky.

In Facebook, the CIA and other intelligence agencies have had a great front for their data-mining work, and they weren’t going to let it fail.

As for the future, the insiders could take FB shares down again, let them languish, and then rocket them up. Why make just one big score when you can double-dip and make two?

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Every television newscast is staged reality

Every television newscast is staged reality

by Jon Rappoport

August 18, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

Focus on the network evening news. This is where the staging is done well.

First, we have the image itself, the colors in foreground and background, the blend of restful and charged hues. The anchor and his/her smooth style.

Then we have the shifting of venue from the studio to reporters in the field, demonstrating the reach of coverage: the planet. As if this equals authenticity.

Actually, those reporters in the field rarely dig up information on location. A correspondent standing on a rooftop in Cairo could just as well be positioned in a bathroom in a Las Vegas McDonald’s. His report would be identical.

The managing editor, usually the elite news anchor, chooses the stories to cover and has the final word on their sequence.

The anchor goes on the air: “Our top story tonight, more signs of gridlock today on Capitol Hill, as legislators walked out of a session on federal budget negotiations…”

The viewer fills in the context for the story: “Oh yes, the government. Gridlock is bad. Just like traffic on the I-5. A bad thing. We want the government to get something done, but they’re not. These people are always arguing with each other. They don’t agree. They’re in conflict. Yes, conflict, just like on the cop shows.”

The anchor: “The Chinese government reports the new flu epidemic has spread to three provinces. Forty-two people have already died, and nearly a thousand are hospitalized…”

The viewer again supplies context, such as it is: “Flu. Dangerous. Epidemic. Could it arrive here? Get my flu shot. Do the Chinese doctors know what they’re doing? Crowded cities. Maybe more cases all of a sudden. Ten thousand, a hundred thousand.”

The anchor: “A new university study states that gun owners often stock up on weapons and ammunition, and this trend has jumped quickly since the Newtown, Connecticut, school-shooting tragedy…”

The viewer: “People with guns. Why do they need a dozen weapons? People in small towns. I don’t need a gun. The police have guns. Could I kill somebody if he broke into the house?”

The anchor: “Doctors at Yale University have made a discovery that could lead to new treatments in the battle against Autism…”

Viewer: “That would be good. More research. Laboratory. Germs. The brain.”

If, at the end of the newscast, the viewer bothered to review the stories and his own reactions to them, he would realize he’d learned almost nothing. But reflection is not the game.

In fact, the flow of the news stories has washed over him and created very little except a sense of (false) continuity.

It would never occur to him to wonder: are the squabbling political legislators really two branches of the same Party? Does government have the Constitutional right to incur this much debt? Where is all that money coming from? Taxes? Other sources? Who invents money?

Is the flu dangerous for most people? If not, why not? Do governments overstate case numbers? How do they actually test patients for the flu? Are the tests accurate? Are they just trying to convince us to get vaccines?

What happens when the government has overwhelming force and citizens have no guns?

When the researchers keep saying “may” and “could,” does that mean they’ve actually discovered something useful about Autism, or are they just hyping their own work and trying to get funding for their next project?

These are only a few of the many questions the typical viewer never considers.

Therefore, every story on the news broadcast achieves the goal of keeping the context small and narrow—night after night, year after year. The overall effect of this staging is small viewer, small viewer’s mind, small viewer’s understanding.

Billions of dollars are spent by the networks to build a reality the size of a room in a cheap motel.

Next we come to words over pictures. More and more, news broadcasts are using the rudimentary film technique of a voice narrating what the viewer is seeing on the screen.

People are shouting and running and falling in a street. The anchor or a field reporter says: “The country is in turmoil. Parliament has suspended sessions for the third day in a row, as the government decides what to do about uprisings aimed at forcing democratic elections…”

Well, the voice must be right, because we’re seeing the pictures. If the voice said the riots were due to garbage-pickup cancellations, the viewer would believe that, too.

How about this: two-day-old footage of runners approaching the finish line of the Boston Marathon. A puff of smoke rises at the right of the screen. A runner falls down in the street. The anchor is saying: “The FBI has announced a bomb made in a pressure cooker caused the injuries and deaths.”

Must be a pressure cooker. Ban pressure cookers. We saw the pictures and heard the voice explain.

We see Building #7 of the WTC collapse. Must have been the result of a fire. The anchor tells us so. Words over pictures.

We see footage of Lee Harvey Oswald inside the Dallas police station. The anchor tells he’s about to be transferred, under heavy guard, to another location. Oswald must be guilty, because we’re seeing him in a police station, and the anchor just said “under heavy guard.”

Staged news.

It mirrors what the human mind, in an infantile state, is always doing: looking at the world and seeking a brief summary to explain what that world is, at any given moment.

power outside the matrix

Since the dawn of time, untold billions of people have been urging a “television anchor” to “explain the pictures.”

The news gives them that precise thing, that precise solution, every night.

“Well, Mr. Jones,” the doctor says, as he pins X-rays to a screen in his office. “See this? Right here? We’ll need to start chemo immediately, and then we may have to remove most of your brain, and as a followup, take out one eye.”

Sure, why not? The patient saw the pictures and the anchor explained them.

After watching and listening to a month or two of news, planted with key words, the population is ready to see the President or one of his minions step up to a microphone and say, “Quantitative easing…sequester…”

Reaction? “Oh, yes, that’s right, I’ve heard those words before, it (whatever “it” is) must be okay.”

A month later, those two terms disappear, as if they’d never existed.

Eventually, people get the idea and do it for themselves. They see things, they invent one-liners to explain them.

They’re their own anchors. They short-cut and undermine their own experience with vapid summaries of what it all means.

At some point in time, the television audience begins to experience an itch. “If reality is the news, then maybe I could become a visible piece of reality. Maybe I could get on the news. What would I have to do? How can I stand out? What outlandish thing could I cook up?”

Anyone’s face could appear on the screen and flicker there and be driven into the minds of millions of people.

If not fortune, then at least fame.

An honest television news anchor, if one existed, would say:

“The battle over the government shutdown and its funding continue as a piece of planned chaos. Events like this are shaped well in advance by men who manipulate the One Political Party With Two Heads, and you, the viewer, are reacting predictably. You’re choosing sides. You’re angry. And I’m sitting here on most nights adding fuel to the fire. The fix is in, and I’m going along with it. Here in the studio, I’m staging the news about staged reality.”

The news is a movie of a movie.

And then, of course, when the news cuts to commercial, the fake products takes over:

“Well, every night they’re showing the same brand names, so those brands must be better than the unnamed alternatives.”

Which devolves into: “I like this commercial better than that commercial. This is a great commercial. Let’s have a contest and vote on the best commercial.”

Which devolves into: reality is an advertisement for itself.

“Hello. I’m staged reality and I’m doing ads to promote me.”

For “intelligent” viewers, there is another sober mainstream choice, a safety valve: PBS. That newscast tends to show more pictures from foreign lands.

“Yes, I watch PBS because they understand the planet is interconnected. It isn’t just about America. That’s good.”

Sure it’s good, if you want the same no-context or false-context reporting on events in other countries. Instead of the two minutes NBC might give you about momentous happenings in Iraq, PBS will give you three minutes, plus congenial experts commenting abstractly, employing longer words.

PBS’ experts seem kinder and gentler. “They’re nice and they’re more relaxed. I like that.”

Yes, the PBS experts are taking Valium, and they’re not drinking as much coffee as the NBC experts.

Brian Williams (NBC), the current champion of network anchors, seems to have downed one cup of coffee and half a Valium. He’s balanced. He’s neutral, he reveals a bit of an edge now and then, but we know he really cares, he just can’t show it because that would imply bias. And somehow (lighting, makeup), he’s forever young. He’s riding his bike down a country road tossing rolled-up newspapers on porches. It’s still morning in America…

Diane Sawyer (ABC) is for the weepers. If she’s not shedding a tear, she’s ready to. It’s there, in reserve. Her next gig should be on General Hospital.

Scott Pelley (CBS) is always ready to put on Dan Rather’s old tan bush jacket with the many pockets. And go out in the field, where it’s really happening. He’s the field surgeon who’ll do operations without an anesthetic if he has to. CBS producers keep beating him about the head and telling him he has to appear more human. They don’t have a drug for that yet.

This is the main cast of actors.

They deliver the long con every night on the tube, between commercials.

Staged.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com