Is “1st US Ebola patient” a hoax?

by Jon Rappoport

October 1, 2014

Trumpeted headline news:

An unnamed Ebola patient is isolated at the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas, after arriving from Liberia (see also this).

First of all, we have the highly dubious marketing aspect of the whole event, in order to achieve an explosive effect.

Media outlets, taking their cue from the CDC, are using the term, “1st US Ebola patient,” when that is obviously false.

Several other Ebola patients have been treated in the US, most notably Dr. Keith Brantly.

It turns out the CDC technically means: first Ebola patient diagnosed here in the US. The others were apparently diagnosed in West Africa.

The difference is hardly significant. It certainly doesn’t rate banner headlines. So why is the CDC, and therefore the US government making such a big deal out of this patient?

The CDC wants every American to know the agency is hunting down—and will quarantine—every person they find who had recent contact with the Dallas patient—beginning a new phase in the Ebola scare-campaign.

Not only that, any of those contacts who turn out to be positive for Ebola will, in turn, trigger a yet-wider search for his/her contacts…and so on.

This hunt-and-search dragnet sets the stage for quarantines in designated sectors across the US.—and travel bans.

The dragnet comes at a moment when announcements about releasing a new Ebola vaccine are accelerating—and of course the CDC wants to make sure Americans accept the vaccine, even though tests for its safety have barely begun.

Ramp up the fear of Ebola; release the vaccine; urge, insist, and demand the population take the shot.

On a scientific level, as CDC chief Tom Frieden mentioned in his press conference yesterday, the diagnosis of Ebola in the Dallas patient was done by the use of the PCR test (see the 2m06s mark in the video of the press conference).

Frieden assured the press the test is highly accurate.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bxencye1cg&w=530&h=298]

Actually, the very sensitive test is prone to a number of errors, the first of which is mistaking the tiny amount of cellular material taken from the patient for an element of the Ebola virus.

More important, since the PCR is based on the idea of amplifying, millions of times, this sample, in order to be able to observe it, it throws into doubt the premise that the patient has enough virus in his body to cause disease.

A person who is purportedly ill as a result of a virus has millions and millions of the active virus in his body. There is no need to run the PCR test in that case.

It is therefore legitimate to ask: why was the PCR done on the Dallas patient?

Instead, why weren’t other tests run?

And: why wasn’t a test done which directly isolated the Ebola virus in the patient and then measured the quantity and concentration (titer) of it in his body?

Following their own paradigm of disease, that’s what researchers and doctors would want: information about how much virus is present in the patient.

The PCR test does not yield reliable data in that regard.

No scientist who owes his job and reputation to the CDC or any other conventional medical organization will press these questions, but there are plenty of independent scientists who can step forward.

Now is the time. The Dallas patient is being used to forward a fear/quarantine/vaccine agenda.

Notice—absolutely nothing is being said about the most important fact in this equation: the strength of a person’s immune system and its superior ability to throw off a virus on its own.

Of course not. That would undercut the fact that selling drugs and vaccines is the number-one ambition of the medical industry.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

For alert minds: the art of the covert narrative

Sep30

by Jon Rappoport

September 30, 2014

“Build it and they will come. Build a false narrative and people will come in droves.” —The Underground, Jon Rappoport

When a researcher or an investigator suspects he is looking at an artificial narrative, a storyline that is floated to achieve a hidden agenda, he has to deal with one overriding question:

How deep does he want to go, in order to root out the potential lies and false material?

Into how basic a level of the narrative does he want to cut, to see what leaks out?

Case in point: the current Ebola storyline.

Many lies can be found there. I have written about them (archived here). But one statement in the Ebola narrative is almost universally accepted.

It is accepted in the case of Ebola, Swine Flu, Bird Flu, SARS, and West Nile.

Most recently, the story began this way: “In three West African countries, there has been an outbreak of Ebola.”

This is the crux: “the Ebola virus is killing people.”

The audience automatically accepts that premise.

Whatever else they may or may not accept, they buy that premise.

So many consequences, official and unofficial, can flow from the basic premise, you would think alert people would probe it—but they don’t.

They go for it hook, line, and sinker.

They don’t know whether it’s true, they don’t have any idea about the reality of the assumption, but they grab it and cling to it.

Then they say, “Since we know the Ebola virus is killing lots and lots of people, what else can we infer?”

Effective narratives work that way: slip in a basic idea, watch people buy it and build on it.

What about the kids in Denver now being reported with “muscle weakness?” Must be a virus, the experts say; just not sure which one. Really? Then how do they know it’s a virus at all? Or any germ?

Why is “the mystery illness that’s sweeping the US” caused by a germ? How do we know it’s one illness? The general symptoms that are always reported in these “outbreaks” could be caused by 6 different germs—or none at all.

I remember when Jim West, a fine independent researcher, correlated a so-called outbreak of West Nile with centers of spewing industrial pollution in the US.

Back in 2003, I discovered that at least a quarter of the cases of SARS in Hong Kong, one of the “epicenter” cities, were coming from the Amoy Gardens apartment complex, where feces were leaking into the internal water supply—a plumbing problem.

And “Swine Flu” was an environmental/corporate problem in La Gloria, Mexico, on a large commercial pig farm, where lagoons of pig feces were baking and festering in the sun—and then, on top of that, outside contractors were called in to spray the area with toxic chemicals, which made the local workers even sicker.

In three or four articles about Ebola, I’ve listed all the endemic, chronic, and long-term horrific conditions in West Africa which have been killing people—and none of those conditions is related to Ebola.

I’ve demonstrated, on many occasions, how the most frequently used tests for diagnosing viral diseases—the antibody and PCR tests—are totally unreliable, deceptive, and useless.

I’ve explained that when it comes to germs, the factor that determines health or illness in a human being is the strength of his immune system—not the germ itself.

Ever since 1988, I’ve been writing about the toxic effects of vaccines, which of course involve direct injection of germs, toxic metals, and chemicals into the body, bypassing channels of immune defense—and causing illness.

In West Africa, as elsewhere, vaccination campaigns have been standard operating procedure for decades.

But no. It has to be Ebola, Ebola, Ebola. That’s the narrative and people buy it.

Just as it has to be HIV, HIV, HIV in Africa. In that case, not only are the widely used diagnostic tests useless, but there are quite serious questions about whether HIV exists at all.

That’s right. At primitivism.com, you can read a long interview, by journalist Christine Johnson, with biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos Eleopulos of The Perth Group: “Does HIV exist?”

It tackles somewhat complex technical questions and makes them understandable for the lay reader. It is one of the best interviews on virus hunting I have ever read—a remarkable achievement.

Selling the “the germ and only the germ causes disease” narrative is one of the great propaganda triumphs of modern medicine. Well, if you had a few billion dollars, an army of compliant media journalists, tens of thousands of doctors, and the federal government at your beck and call, you could sell the idea that tomatoes are the preferred fuel for space travel.

In these narratives, always go back to the beginning. Root out the most basic assumptions, and investigate them.

You’ll be surprised.

And when it comes to medical narratives, remember that horror stories about germs are absolutely necessary in order to sell drugs and vaccines.

Some of the major propagandists on the planet ply their trade in that arena.

They succeed because they maintain that the “tiny terrorists” are invisible—except to the experts.

It would be comparable to asserting that data interception and spying are such technical matters that only the NSA and other official professionals are able to understand it—and therefore the public should never question the particulars.

There are untold thousands of capable people taking apart the NSA narrative these days—but how many are taking apart the statement, “The germ XYZ caused the outbreak?”

Jon Rappoport

History proves vaccines are quite safe—really?

Sep29

History proves vaccines are quite safe—really?

by Jon Rappoport

September 29, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

In 1987, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I decided to look into vaccines as a cause of immune-system suppression.

I had never dug below the surface of that subject before.

Of course, the authorities and experts have been forever telling people how effective and safe vaccines are. They issue their remarks with great assurance.

Here are just a few of my findings, from 1987. They paint a different historical record.

“Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination).” W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.

“… Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP [diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis vaccine], that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217

“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company, Ltd., p. 58.

“… the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths.” U.S. News and World Report, Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, “How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases.”

“At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967.

“Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years.” Hazards of Immunization, Wilson.

“So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States. It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases (of polio) which were caused directly or indirectly by the (polio) vaccination constitute minimum figures… It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 (polio) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine. A careful study of the epidemiologic course of polio in the United States yields indications of grave significance. In numerous states of the U.S.A., typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955… The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 cannot be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980, vol. 19, no. 4, “Story of the Salk Vaccine (Part 2).”

“Suffice it to say that most of the large (polio) epidemics that have occurred in this country since the introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset. To name a few, there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955; the Chicago epidemic of 1956; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980 vol. 19, no. 4.

“Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

“Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Yes, a different history. Is there a school anywhere which would dare teach it?

Jon Rappoport

The creative versus the machine

Sep28

The creative versus the machine

by Jon Rappoport

September 28, 2014

OutsideTheRealityMachine

(To sign up for the FREE OutsideTheRealityMachine newsletter, click here.)

There are some people who hear the word CREATE and wake up, as if a new flashing music has begun.

This lone word makes them see something majestic and untamed.

They feel the sound of a Niagara approaching.

They suddenly know why they are alive.

Most people don’t travel to that grand arena because they’ve been trained like pets by some sector of this society to be good girls and boys.

Maybe you once saw something truly free that didn’t care about consequences, and it blew you into tomorrow and turned on your soul’s electricity for an hour.

CREATE is a word that should be oceanic. It should shake and blow apart the pillars of the smug boredom of the soul.

CREATE is about what the individual does when he is on fire and doesn’t care about concealing it. It’s about what the individual invents when he has thrown off the false front that is slowly strangling him.

CREATE is about the end of mindless postponement. It’s about what happens when you burn up the pretty and petty little obsessions. It’s about emerging from the empty suit and empty machine of society that goes around and around and sucks away the vital bloodstream.

CREATE can come as a wild clanging of impossible things.

Out of dull silence, imagination answers the call and opens up caverns of energy.

Everything that already exists stands up and announces it is ready to melt down and become raw fuel for imagination.

Fear announces it. Revenge announces it. The desperate wish to belong announces it. Threads of aimless longing announce it. The void announces it.

Then, action.

Then, nothing is ever the same again.

The life of Herculean accommodation at all levels is over.

Jon Rappoport

Imagination and the fire

Sep27

Imagination and the fire

by Jon Rappoport

September 27, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Once upon a time, human beings lived in cultures where images were alive. What we now call superstitions were, to them, gods and demons and intermediary entities that transmitted or stole the juice and the energy and the power of life.

It’s nearly impossible to project ourselves into such an environment and experience the burgeoning passions that infused experience—because a great shift has occurred.

The West entered, with anticipation, a temple where images were aligned with so-called rational faith.

This eventually precipitated a crisis. If you don’t have, or believe in, images that live and breathe and are intimately connected with life-force, how do you replace them? How do you avoid becoming pallid skeletons of science, whose productions never impart that same fire?

This crisis is reflected all around us every day.

We have become liberated, and in this liberation we are left with emptiness. On top of that, we have decided to assume that passions of the soul should be modulated, like elevator music, to somehow join with our advanced knowledge, in harmonic balance.

It’s no balance; it’s timidity, and this attitude makes us prey to an eerie tolerance of all opinion and custom and point of view and aspiration and stretched-out egalitarianism and criminal action. Giving no offense, under any circumstances, for any reason, is now the coin of the realm.

You might say, with accurate assessment, that these are qualities of the successful salesman. And that is what so many of us have become: ambassadors of the vague and desiccated pulse of our “rational culture.”

We even think of it in religious terms. The message of this church is the honed and blown-dry embrace of Anything. As if this was the message of Jesus and Buddha and Krishna and other teachers of our blurry past.

To counterbalance this bleached present, many of us are drawn into dark theaters to watch suburban humans turned into bloodsucking harpooned-tooth neck fetishists and genetic mistakes and hair-sprouting wolves and irradiated monsters or heroes.

It’s the instant-coffee version of ancient Dionysian adventure. And the accompanying depiction of gym-sex on the screen wouldn’t stir the interest of a mouse in a barn.

Was this why and for what we abandoned the mysteries of the epoch of magic?

For freckled children in a British academy laboring through a paranormal costume drama, tricked out with the accoutrement of grottoes and dark halls?

The crisis on our hands now is not one that is going to go away. It is not going to recede as magic once receded. Because there WAS a reason we liberated ourselves from the Middle Ages and even the Renaissance—a reason beyond technology—and until we find it and face it and deeply accept the new struggle, we are going to see this simulacrum culture of ours make endless cartoons of itself in dried out oceans of concrete.

For what we need to do now, pharmaceuticals and brain research and genetic manipulation and cyber-affectation and instant global communication and worship (or desecration) of profit-making idols hold no answers.

Suppose what took us into the age of rationality was, in some way, connected to the realization that we were, all along, inventing our own demons and gods and demigods and entities of great life-force—and although that knowledge has been shoved into the background, as trivial and passe, while technology has soared, it is still with us, and it overshadows all our machines and their power.

Suppose this is the message: we are the majestic and wild creatures we built the temples to.

We are the makers; we are the architects of all the dreams—and not through some compensatory impulse, but because WE CREATE. That is our natural inclination and the source of our ecstasy. It is only civilization that seems to cast us in other roles.

Our societies and civilizations are arranged to make it seem as if imagination is a preposterous choice—when, in fact, that is what we are here for. That is what got us here.

Societies are actually in a satellite universe, and the prime universe is all imagination.

The underlying hidden and deeply buried cry of our age is: HOW CAN I CREATE?

Ridiculously, we are the artists of no limits who are asking that question of ourselves.

While, in the deep past, we sucked the marrow out of the bones of the gods we invented and thereby felt enormous passions, we knew there was a missing piece, and that piece was an abyss over which we were hanging. So we came all this way to find out that we authored the labyrinth. We built the paths that gave us joy and terror, and now we can consciously and spontaneously make new worlds without end. Not simply as engineers, but as artists.

Swallowing that stark truth may be hard, may be upsetting, but it IS why we made the voyage.

And then pulled our punches.

This is no archaic revival. It’s now, today and tomorrow.

The universe is waiting for imagination for revolutionize it down to its core.

Jon Rappoport

Ebola: one covert op feeds into another

Sep27

Ebola: one covert op feeds into another

by Jon Rappoport

September 27, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Reference: my collection, The Matrix Revealed.

Some covert ops start out by focusing on an area of conflict.

The first action-step is: repackaging and renaming and relabeling that area so it looks like something it is not.

When that is done, the group in charge of the op has a false reality, a synthetic reality which they can manage, describe, work with, publicize, deploy, reshape, add to, subtract from.

In the case of West Africa, this synthetic reality is “Ebola.”

In my previous article, I listed the real factors which have been debilitating and killing people in that area for a very long time. These factors have nothing to do with a virus called “Ebola.”

But the op is transformative. It shifts the focus. It paints a different picture. It makes a substitution.

Instead of severe malnutrition, protein-calorie deficit, starvation, contaminated water, horrific wars, grinding poverty, hopelessness, stolen farm land, industrial pollution, the invasion of outside investors and corporations who take over the natural riches of the area, toxic vaccine campaigns, toxic drugs (including vast overuse of antibiotics, which destroys the ability to absorb nutrients)—instead of these chronic conditions, we have a repackaged and re-formed and recreated reality: the virus. Ebola.

The stage magician’s trick. The illusion.

He takes a deck of cards and throws the deck at a wall. The cards fly every which way—chaos, confusion, many things happening all at once. And then, all of a sudden, the cards are lying on the floor, but one card is up against the wall, impaled there by a knife.

The audience gasps.

And on the one card is written the word: Ebola.

Everyone is frozen.

The magician says, “Let me tell you about Ebola. There are many things you need to know. For the moment, we are safe, but we are threatened.”

He has the audience’s attention. Does he ever.

Now he tells a story, a long story, and it ends with the word: “Vaccine.”

The audience experiences a jump-shift. They don’t know it, but they’re being taken into a much larger op—whose subject is “all possible vaccines for everyone from cradle to grave.”

Well, they have certainly heard about vaccines, and most of them have gotten vaccines. They feel they’re on familiar ground.

From “vaccines” he moves to “immunity.”

How wonderful. How magical. With vaccines, doctors can impart protection.

The illusionist is really working his audience now. He’s at the top of his game.

“Vaccines, you see, stimulate the body to produce antibodies, which are marvelous creatures who can move through the whole body and search out invaders…and when they find these intruders, these stalkers, these terrorists, the antibodies paint large Xs on them.”

How beautiful.

“And then the rest of the immune system, the infantry and the air force and navy, know exactly where the enemy is located. They will now launch a multi-front attack, and win.”

The magician describes how vaccines do all this in advance of any actual terrorist invasion, so that when the real monster comes along, the body will be prepared, its immune system already in a state of readiness and high alert.

The magician neglects to mention that the action of vaccines—producing antibodies—does not equal immunity.

Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983:

“In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for example, even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers…

“In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.

“In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing.

“Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently.

“A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era.”

“…in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” —Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.

“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” —Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company, Ltd., 1987, p. 58.

This is just a sample of available literature on the subject of vaccines failing to impart immunity. And then, of course, there are the “unintended consequences.”

Here is one illustration among many:

“Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” —DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

When the covert-op group begins with a false reality, the one it packaged and shaped and sculpted and promoted, and when the group bases all its subsequent actions on that fabrication, strange consequences can ensue.

“Well, we didn’t predict that. And this—we never thought this would occur. And where did that third thing come from?”

The journal Pediatrics, January 1996, pages 53 and 58. “Changing Levels of Measles Antibody Titers [concentrations] in Women and Children…”:

“The major reason that children fail to respond to the measles vaccine is the presence of passively acquired maternal antibodies.”

What? What does that mean?

It means the child’s mother obtained her immunity to measles when she was a child and had measles—and when, much later in life, she gives birth, she passes this immunity to her baby for a time.

However, this natural process of delivering immunity to the baby interferes with the action of the measles vaccine, when it is eventually given to her child.

The study author is still optimistic, though. “…most women of childbearing age in the United States now acquire measles immunity from vaccination, not from wild [natural] measles virus infection…these women are likely to pass lower levels of the measles antibody to their infants.”

And then the measles vaccine will work for the infants.

In truth, “work” merely means doctors will see “markers” indicating that the vaccine is doing its job—which, as I’ve discussed above, is not the same thing as delivering actual immunity.

Do you see the picture? The idea is, in order for vaccines to “work,” all mothers must acquire “immunity” from vaccinations they received when they were children.

Gaining genuine immunity naturally, through acquiring the actual disease—that must be stamped out, gotten rid of.

Then the circle will be complete. The synthetic artificial circle. Divorced from Nature.

The magician stops his story. He considers the implications. He hadn’t intended to take things this far. Now he seems to be committed to a different kind of world altogether.

He had been aiming lower. He wanted to use the “Ebola” construct to move his audience into a general acceptance of, and love for, all vaccines. That was the op. That was the whole idea of the op.

He walks offstage; his manager approaches him.

“What’s wrong?” the manager asks him.

“I just saw an unintended consequence,” the magician says, and explains his new revelation.

The manager stares at the magician. “Well,” he says, “welcome to the bigger op. The one you didn’t know was there. We not only want to vaccinate everyone on the planet, we want to induce and shape a new world, in which immunity from disease will be artificially induced and regulated from top to bottom, inside a grand bubble, so to speak.”

The magician feels like he’s about to pass out.

“You mean we’re all going to live under a dome, so nobody can catch a disease naturally anymore? Are you crazy?”

“Not crazy,” the manager says. “Look around you. We’re making a synthetic planet in many ways. Humans are merely biological machines. Think of vaccines as part of a game. They have no true meaning. They’re…rituals of assurance. Social constructs. That’s all. When humans are entirely constructed of artificial parts, and that day will come, we’ll still vaccinate, because we enjoy the ceremony and the traditional meaning of it—care and concern for each other in the great Collective.”

“Under the Great Synthetic Dome.”

“Yes, if you will. Under the Dome.”

And that is how one op can feed into another.

Reality invented for us.

As opposed to us creating our own.

Jon Rappoport

Exit From The Matrix: reality is a covert op

Sep26

Exit From The Matrix: reality is a covert op

by Jon Rappoport

September 26, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Think of Reality as a product on a podium in a futuristic department store.

As you approach it, you realize it has many sides.

You come up to it and walk around it.

On one side, it appears to be gray and featureless, an average of thousands of ideas reduced down to a hazy sludge.

On another side, it is bright and clear, a child’s morning.

On another side, it is a series of interlocking systems. One click of one piece in one system triggers all pieces of all systems. They move in concert.

On another side, it is a human figure who is speaking. He’s surrounded by auras whose pulsing energy directs you to consider his every phrase a masterpiece of earnest wisdom.

On another side, it is memory. The best of what has happened to you edited from your past.

On another side, there is only the soft magnetic pull toward sleep.

On another side, it is war, conflict, suffering, strangely presented as a puzzle that seems to be missing one piece which, if found, would transform human anguish into joy.

On another side, it is a long path, traced with lights, along which you make effortless choices, each of which leads to the next question and the next choice.

As you continue to walk around the product called Reality, you begin to realize it has been designed to achieve maximum involvement—

The salesman comes over and says, “What do you think?”

“It’s very interesting,” you say.

He nods. “The whole point is, after you buy it, we provide you with a code that allows you to live inside it.”

The thought is staggering.

“Inside it?” you say.

“Oh yes,” the salesman says. “That’s the only way to really appreciate it. There are untold numbers of people in there already. You’ll embark on a voyage of discovery…”

“What kind of voyage?” you say. “You mean I’ll be trying to get out again?”

“Well, yes. But you’ll also be absorbed with discovering more about the product.”

Needless to say, we all bought the product, and we’re engaged in discovering more about it.

But getting out of it, getting outside it, exiting from it is a different matter.

That process is all about imagination, because imagination creates reality.

This was the guiding principle in developing my collection, Exit From the Matrix.

All covert ops are ultimately aimed at constructing realities. Stage plays. Virtual environments.

And all covert ops are aimed at triggering emotions and images in the target audience, in order to enlist their faith and belief in the illusion.

“If X makes me feel this way and see these things, X must be real.”

That statement, that formulation is the bottom-line on why the product called Reality sells so well.

“If X makes me feel this way and see these things, it must be real.”

Here are the contents of my collection, Exit From The Matrix:

First, my new audio presentations:

* INTRODUCTION: HOW TO USE THE MATERIALS IN EXIT FROM THE MATRIX

* EXIT FROM THE MATRIX

* 50 IMAGINATION EXERCISES

* FURTHER IMAGINATION EXERCISES

* ANESTHESIA, BOREDOM, EXCITEMENT, ECSTASY

* ANCIENT TIBET AND THE UNIVERSE AS A PRODUCT OF MIND

* YOU THE INVENTOR, MINDSET, AND FREEDOM FROM “THE EXISTENCE PROGRAM”

* PARANORMAL EXPERIMENTS AND EXERCISES

* CHILDREN AND IMAGINATION

* THE CREATIVE LIFE AND THE MATRIX/IMAGINATION

* PICTURES OF REALITY AND ESCAPE VELOCITY FROM THE MATRIX

* THIS WOULD BE A VERY DIFFERENT FUTURE

* MODERN ZEN

* THE GREAT PASSIONS AND THE GREAT ANDRIODS

Then you will receive the following audio seminars I have previously done:

* Mind Control, Mind Freedom

* The Transformations

* Desire, Manifestation and Fulfillment

* Altered States, Consciousness, and Magic

* Beyond Structures

* The Mystery and Magic of Dialogue

* The Voyage of Merlin

* Modern Alchemy and Imagination

* Imagination and Spiritual Enlightenment

* Dissolving Stress

* The Paranormal Project

* Zen Painting for Everyone Now

* Past Lives, Archetypes, and Hidden Sources of Human Energy

* Expression of Self

* Imagination Exercises for a Lifetime

* Old Planet, New Planet, New Mind

* The Era of Magic Returns

* Your Power Revealed

* Universes Without End

* Relationships

* Building a Business for Success

I have included an additional bonus section:

* My book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies (pdf document)

* My book, The Ownership of All Life (pdf document)

* A long excerpt from my briefly published book, Full Power (pdf document)

* My 24 articles in the series, “Coaching the Coaches” (pdf document)

And these audio seminars:

* The Role of Medical Drugs in Human Illness

* Longevity One: The Mind-Body Connection

* Longevity Two: The Nutritional Factors

(All the audio presentations are mp3 files and the documents and books are pdf files. You download the files upon purchase. There is no physical ship.)

What has been called The Matrix is a series of layers. These layers compose what we call Reality. Reality is not merely the consensus people accept in their daily lives. It is also a personal and individual conception of limits. It is a perception that these limits are somehow built into existence. But this is not true.

What I’ve done here is remove the lid on those perceived limits. This isn’t an intellectual undertaking. It’s a way to open up space and step on to a new road.

That road travels to more joy and fulfillment. More and more power.

Jon Rappoport

Ebola: what op is being planned for Western nations?

Sep26

Ebola: what op is being planned for Western nations?

by Jon Rappoport

September 26, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

In this article, I’m not going to try to recapitulate everything I’ve written about Ebola so far.

I’ll outline two possible scenarios for the near future in Western nations. Scenario 1 and Modified Scenario 1. Both would be planned ops.

#1: Announcement: a vaccine is available. Authorities will declare who should take it. In an extreme situation, people in certain sectors will be commanded to take it. And if they don’t, they will be quarantined, regardless of their health status.

Quarantines in selected areas would be enforced by police and troops stationed on streets, taking people to their homes, ordering them to stay in their homes. In those areas, businesses would be ordered to close.

Flights in and out of selected areas would be shut down.

The vaccine would be called safe, “according to limited tests,” and “less risky than Ebola.” People who fall ill or worse as a result of the vaccine would tend to be labeled as Ebola cases—“the onset of the disease was more rapid than anticipated.”

“It’s the disease, not the vaccine.”

As part of the overall scenario, Ebola case numbers will be grossly exaggerated. In fact, most cases will be casually diagnosed from visible and general flu-like symptoms—eyeball diagnoses made by doctors and nurses at clinics, hospitals, and offices.

Blood samples taken to confirm these people’s diagnosis, at labs, will shockingly, to a large degree, show no presence of Ebola—but this fact will be covered up, as it was in the case of Swine Flu in 2009 and SARS in 2003.

If no vaccine is released, then the pharmaceutical profit center will focus on medicines that “fight viruses.” These drugs will be toxic and have significant adverse effects. Again, patients who fall ill will be labeled “Ebola rapid-onset.”

Here is Modified Scenario #1:

It can be characterized by the after-op wrap-up: “We in the West escaped by the skin of our teeth. We almost had an uncontrollable nightmare on our hands. But thanks to public-health measures and the tracking of suspected cases, we averted doom…this time.” Heroes named and applauded.

No widespread quarantines. No major troop presence.

In that case, the main target of the op would turn out to be, as it is now, the West African countries. Borders sealed, chaos and massive quarantines inside, debilitation and death from a number of ongoing and long-term causes, none of which really have anything to do with Ebola:

Severe malnutrition; starvation; war; poverty; industrial pollution; contaminated water supplies; stolen farm land; overcrowding; prior toxic vaccine campaigns for yellow fever, polio, meningitis; toxic medical drugs.

All adding up to: destruction of immune systems, after which any germ passing through the territory accelerates dying. Ebola, cholera, flu, pneumocystis, measles, etc. Ebola itself is not the threat.

And if all that is not enough—perhaps the intentional introduction of a virtually undetectable chemical(s) that debilitates and kills for a limited period of time and then dissipates. The victims, of course, will be labeled “Ebola.”

Meanwhile, through brokered IMF “assistance” deals and other backroom agreements—with the West African population too weak to resist—outside financiers, investors, and corporations will expand their stranglehold over the rich mineral resources and land of those countries.

My best guess at this time is we will see Modified Scenario #1, the “by the skin of our teeth we escaped” op. Western nations will not be said to be overrun with Ebola. There will not be massive and widespread quarantines in all nations.

However, enough cases will be announced to scare people.

“We had a brush with disaster. It was a close call. A few more ‘links in the chain’ and we would have had a firestorm on a global scale.”

“Therefore, in the future, listen very closely to the medical experts. Do what they tell you to do immediately. Take your medicines. Get your vaccines, all of them, according to public-health mandated schedules.”

“Those leaders who are running and monitoring health insurance programs around the world should insist that delivering medical care is contingent on recipients taking their vaccines and other drugs as ordered and prescribed.”

Both Scenario #1 and its modified version are sheer reality-invention for the helpless, the mindless, the dupes, the pawns, the suckers, the rubes, and the merely uninformed.

As always, there is a vital relationship between a) those who know the truth and make it known, and b) the merely uninformed.

The number of people who wake up and realize what the op is, and refuse to participate—as they did successfully during the Swine Flu dud—can turn the tables and win.

If there is an X-factor here, you may find it through predictions of Ebola case numbers by the CDC (and the World Health Organization). If they back off a bit and modulate their estimates in a downward direction, you’ll pretty much know that at worst, this will be a “skin of our teeth” op.

If the CDC keeps doubling down with its “1 million Ebola cases” insanity, we could be in for a rocky ride. The CDC always lies. But if they keep these enormous predictive lies in play, it could be a clue the US government intends to fake a whole lot of Ebola.

And that’s what I’m talking about. Fakery.

Jon Rappoport

CDC lied just before whistleblower went public

Sep25

CDC lied just before whistleblower went public

by Jon Rappoport

September 25, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Timeline:

August 25, 2014—the CDC publishes a press release defending its 2004 study on autism.

August 27, 2014—CDC whistleblower publicly admits he and his co-authors cooked that study and committed fraud.

On August 25th, the CDC issued a press release, “Statement Regarding 2004 Pediatrics [study],…”

The CDC was referring to the 2004 study whistleblower William Thompson co-authored, the study he admitted was fraudulent, the study he and his co-authors slanted to bury the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Thompson went public with his confession on August 27th, two days after the CDC posted its press release. So the CDC knew or strongly suspected Thompson was going to go public, and they wanted to head him off at the pass and do a bit of damage control.

Hence, the August 25th CDC press release, which of course tried to defend the scientific validity of the 2004 study.

I’d say there is a strong chance Thompson told his CDC bosses he was going to issue a confession.

Why? Thompson wanted to smooth the waters, keep his job at the CDC, and personally avoid the nasty consequences that would flow from springing a complete surprise on his employers.

The CDC’s August 25th press release contains language specifically directed at what Thompson would allude to, two days later:

The subset of black male babies who showed a much higher risk of autism after receiving the MMR vaccine.

Data on this group, Thompson would confess, was omitted from the study.

Here is the key CDC quote of August 25:

“Access to the information on the birth certificates [of children in the study] allowed researchers to assess more complete information on race as well as other important characteristics, including possible risk factors for autism such as the child’s birth weight, mother’s age, and education. This information was not available for the children without birth certificates; hence CDC study did not present data by race on black, white, or other race children from the whole study sample. It presented the results on black and white/other race children from the group with birth certificates.”

Translation: The authors of the study did a complete analysis of vaccinated children and their risk of autism, including children without birth certificates…and then much later said, “Oops, guess what? We just realized there are some kids without birth certificates. We’ll have to eliminate them from the study.”

Believe that and I have condos for sale on Neptune.

But there’s more. These “kids without birth certificates,” who were dropped from the study, miraculously and accidentally happened to be the ones who showed a much higher risk of autism.

Believe that and I’ll sell you Neptune.

Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Vaccine wars: the censoring of Rob Schneider

Sep25

Vaccine wars: the censoring of Rob Schneider

by Jon Rappoport

September 25, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Yesterday, I reported on State Farm dropping Rob Schneider from their TV ads because he’s alerted people to vaccine dangers.

Because he has a view about vaccines that departs from the norm.

“Punch a hole in consensus reality and you can’t be a spokesman for our products.”

“Cause a ripple among the sleeping populace and you’re out.”

What’s next?

Well, I’ll tell you what could be next, based on the fact that the Internet runs via an interlocking system of commercial companies.

Some companies that facilitate emails to large lists, and website hosts, to say nothing of Facebook, which is already censoring information, could decide, under pressure, or voluntarily, to close down “controversial data.”

A soft version of this is simply shunting emails whose subject lines contain “trigger words” into spam or trash of the recipient.

And what better subject to strangle than vaccination, which the medical-industrial complex ceaselessly promotes as absolutely necessary for the “humane” protection of humankind.

Pro-vaccine loons and fanatics of every stripe would welcome this kind of censorship with religious fervor.

For them, “everybody knows” vaccines are a wondrous miracle of modern science; and in order to shield children (who are already vaccinated and thus immune, but somehow still vulnerable) from unvaccinated devil-spawn, the whole of planet Earth must be jabbed.

Alien/ET comes down from his ship, observes, and reports back:

“They appear to have a Church of Injection. The ritual involves sending germs, metals, and toxic chemicals into the blood.

“They believe this wards off disease. The injections change the body’s response-pattern, so that certain symptoms will henceforth be stifled. This is called ‘immunity.’ Of course, as a result of the needle ritual, new symptoms will appear, and they catalog them under other disease-labels. They fail to see this as a problem. Or perhaps their high priests want to cause the problem…”

What will happen to Schneider’s career now remains to be seen. Will he get a modified free pass as an amusing Hollyweird type who, like Jenny McCarthy and Suzanne Somers, unaccountably “mouths off about modern medicine?”

Surely, he’ll get his share of: “the science proves he’s a menace to health.”

That’s the party line.

Media outlets are stacked with little loyalists who attach themselves to, and kiss the feet of, lying researchers.

I’m sure Schneider would be willing to engage in a reasonable discussion of his views on vaccines—but he is pre-judged for having those views in the first place.

In this war, the combination of a mainstream television news program and a talking doctor are supposed to produce, automatically, the ultimate truth.

“Tonight: a doctor says people who oppose vaccination are a danger to the community…”

The word from on high.

Or: “Tonight, a television news program and a staunch medical proponent of vaccines are a danger to the community…”

News corporations have determined that we can’t have both.

Jon Rappoport