DOES HIV EXIST?

 

DOES HIV EXIST? RADIO ALERT!

 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2011. Okay, folks, I’m getting this one out to you in a hurry, because a radio show on this subject airs in less than 3 hours. I’ll give you the URLs for the show today and the archive.

 

The radio host is my friend, Robert Scott Bell, whom I’ve worked with many times over the years. Today, he’ll explore Brent Leung’s new film, THE EMPEROR’S NEW VIRUS, which takes up the question: DOES HIV EXIST?

 

Don’t miss it. After I wrote AIDS INC., in 1988, which was the first book to reject the idea that HIV caused AIDS, I saw that the next big question was: did they ever isolate HIV in the first place? Did they ever find it? Is it a real virus? Others took up that question and debates moved along, and still move along.

 

Well, today’s show will begin to attack that question directly with interviews and commentary.

 

To listen live, today, Sept. 21, at noon EDT:

http://www.naturalnewsradio.com/

 

To pick up the show in the archive:

http://www.naturalnewsradio.com/Archive-RobertScottBell.asp

 

As you’ll understand, as you listen, this issue spreads out into the whole question of the reliability and validity of various medical diagnostic tests.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

SHORT-CUT DESIRE

 

SHORT-CUT DESIRE

 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011. People look for what they desire, they fasten on to something, they pursue it, and then they express disappointment somewhere along the line. They tend to attribute their regret to a lack of strategy or follow-through, but that’s not it. Not really.

 

The problem came right at the beginning. The desire they picked out of a hat was superficial, it didn’t engage them at a deep enough level.

 

But going to the necessary level seems to have its own problems.

 

Suppose what I find there is too formidable? Suppose I can’t make it work? Suppose other people will think I’m weird?” Suppose, suppose, suppose.

 

Well, what did you think life was? Picking a better shade of nail polish? Buying a slightly more attractive doily than the last doily? Watering the lawn with a hose that has a wider spray? Seeing a movie in 3-D rather than 2-D? Replacing the picture of a saint on your mantle with a larger picture of the saint?

 

Exhaustion and burn-out occur when you’re pursuing a desire you don’t really want.

 

Modern society mainly consists of finding activities that nudge adrenaline, after burnout has already occurred.

 

Faced with all this, many people decide desire itself is a misdirection. Instead, they should be rising above all desire, or they should spend all their time tending to the needs of others.

 

I’m not demeaning helping others. But suppose this is the real formulation: “I’ve given up on myself, so the only thing left is to assist everyone else.” How does that sound? Or how about this: “I can’t summon up energy for my own life, so I’ll find energy in the struggles of others.”

 

In case it isn’t obvious, there has never been a time when the struggles of others weren’t a crisis. It isn’t just today. And giving aid and assistance is a good thing. But when it becomes a substitute for self, and when somebody gets the idea he needs to reduce himself to zero in order to be of service, that’s a different story.

 

What I’m talking about is stagnation of self. Things appear pretty much the same every day. It doesn’t look like there is a way out. But what’s actually happening is this: the person has built up many layers of cotton between himself and what he really wants.

 

And woven into those layers are all sorts of reasons why, even if he did discover what he truly wants, he can’t move forward and get it.

 

Several years ago, I ran into an old friend I hadn’t seen in 30 years. The last time I knew him, he was a musician and a very good one. He’d taken up an instrument one day, when he was thirteen, and in a few months he’d made remarkable progress. He was very talented and very smart. Well, in the interim, from what I could gather, he’d been through three or four careers—none of them particularly rewarding. And now he was a blank. He’d gone down some “spiritual path,” and it was an energy drain.

 

There he was. Taking on one lesser desire after another.

 

All present realities are shams, in the sense that what has yet to be discovered and created is far more galvanizing than what already exists.

 

If you’re going to pick a struggle, let it begin with finding something you REALLY desire.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

The nomorefakenews September fund drive continues. To make a donation, go to PayPal.com, click on the send money button, enter qjrconsulting@gmail.com, and contribute. Thank you.

 

 

 

 

WHAT YOU WANT

 

WHAT YOU WANT

 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011. What you want is an adventure, the far dimensions of which only you know—and you also know that by the time you approach them they’ll no longer be dimensions or boundaries, but instead only more raw fuel for the fire.

 

Pedestrian goals are merely the ticking of the clock, a way to pass hours until the real action begins.

 

When you find a few others who want to go on your ride, don’t compromise by stepping it down.

 

What you really want requires you to produce energy. And when you do, you discover there is no limit on how much you can create. This is a revelation.

 

One of the biggest sticking points is: how many people will be able to understand what you’re doing, what you’re inventing, what you’re pursuing?

 

Often, this is the locus around which people stall. They decide to dilute their goal so that it’s accessible to more people.

 

I understand the reasons for doing that, but take a look at people who have engaged in this watering-down process over a long period of time, and you’ll find they tend to look exhausted. They’re always putting brakes on themselves. They’re plundering their own treasure for the sake of others. They’re intentionally limiting their own energy output.

 

If you imagine many, many, many people doing this, you pretty much have the definition of society. Of course, the problems of society aren’t traced to this limitation-exercise; all sorts of other stories are cooked up to explain why societies run into trouble. But they’re pieces of bad fiction.

 

In the latter stages of a civilization, the majority of effort/resource is focused on “helping those who can’t help themselves.” In other words, the civilization is way past grappling with the question of the individual pursuing his greatest adventure. That prospect has long been forgotten. The individual creation and production of energy has long been forgotten.

 

So the task falls to the individual himself. Where it always was.

 

The rabid collectivist revolutionaries of the early 20th century have spawned smarter descendants who have kinder, gentler strategies. The drip method. Gradually reduce everyone to victim status. Mythologize that covert op as spiritual beneficence of the highest order. Anoint those leaders who pave the way as saints and prophets.

 

It works, but it doesn’t touch what the individual really wants.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

 

CAN’T HAPPEN, WILL HAPPEN

 

CAN’T HAPPEN, DIDN’T HAPPEN, WILL HAPPEN

 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2011. The nomorefakenews September fund drive continues. Thanks to those who’ve made a donation. See the end of this article for how you can help.

 

Reversals are good.

 

Instead of looking for possibilities, look for impossibilities.

 

An Impossibility doesn’t stir an old pot, it stirs a pot that doesn’t even exist. Yet.

 

We look back on past inventions and innovations, we spot a pattern, a seeming inevitability—but to the person who actually made the breakthrough in the first place, something spontaneous, something beyond the pale occurred to him. He wasn’t just mechanically putting piece 1254 into a puzzle after piece 1253.

 

People carve up their futures before they happen. They say, “Well over here are all the things that can’t happen. And over here are all the things that are unlikely to happen. And over here are the things that, given my background and training, might happen.” And so and so forth. Nice and neat. Predictable, reasonable, boring.

 

The cells of the body are waiting for a jolt of newness. That’s what they want.

 

WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE? That’s a powerful question. Of course the answers are going to seem absurd. That’s the whole point. Make them absurd beyond absurd. Keep going. And sooner or later, a gem is going to pop up, and you’ll stop and look at it and turn it over in your hand. And maybe you’ll rub it against another idea and discover a spark.

 

Nothing is settled. Nothing is ever, ever settled.

 

Settled is an act we’d all like to play, until we play it, and then we feel a little morbid.

 

There’s another species on this planet that looks like us. And for them, settled is good. Don’t know why, but that’s the way they are. And they’ve got a boatload of stories to explain why settled is wonderful. The more you listen to those stories, the more you think, well, maybe they’ve got something, maybe I’m missing out. Maybe I want to run around pretending I know everything—that would be a version of settled. I’ll pretend I know everything worth knowing, and I’ll sit on that for forty or fifty years and collect whatever I can get my hands on.

 

If you asked one of these settled people of another species to ask themselves WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE, they’d never do it, because they’d know, as the answers poured in, they’d shatter like porcelain and be gone.

 

WHAT’S IMPOSSIBLE? A hell of a lot more than what’s possible. Count on it. You’re in a good place with impossible. You’ve got lots of room to wander around in. And suppose you take one of these impossible things and make it happen. Breathe some life into it.

 

That’s a kind of power very few people feel.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

To donate to the nomorefakenews September fund drive and support this work, go to Paypal.com, click on the send money button, enter qjrconsulting@gmail.com and make a contribution. You don’t need your own PayPal account to do this. Many thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPACE-TIME AND IMAGINATION

 

SPACE-TIME AND IMAGINATION

 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2011. In space, time passes.

 

That means, if you put a clock in a room, it will tick. If it’s digital, the read-outs will change.

 

Time is associated with change. In that room, a person walks around. A moth circles. Another person enters, then leaves. The shadows move. If you wait long enough, a light bulb will burn out.

 

In space, some objects remain stationary. Books on a shelf. Notebooks on a desk. Boxes piled in a corner. Shoes on the rug. But again, if you wait long enough, those objects change. They decay.

 

So convincing is this presentation, we assume all space is this way. And we assume physical space is all the space there is.

 

Whereas, if we begin talking about the space of imagination, most people would draw a blank. Imagination exists? Yes, maybe, I guess so. But it has a space or spaces? That’s going too far. That’s tantamount to setting up a “competitor” to the space we all recognize.

 

When I began painting in 1962, one of the first things I became aware of was I was finding and creating space on the canvas. And of course, much earlier, I had vivid sleeping dreams. What was that “thing” I was walking around in, in those dreams?

 

I once asked a physicist about this. He said: when you dream, you think you’re in space, but that’s just an illusion. As proof, he pointed out that he wouldn’t be able to measure what was happening in the space of my dreams, and for him, that was that.

 

When you’re inspired by a subjective vision of what you want to do to make your own future, and you stand at a window in the middle of the night and look out over a city, your experience of space is much different from what you experience while walking to your car in the morning to drive to work.

 

And even if you call “the visionary space” subjective, it can be a crucial factor in what you actually do to bring your future about. To make it happen in the world.

 

The energy exercises I offer in Mind Control, Mind Freedom, and The Transformations (audio seminars) are also about space. To project energy, you create space naturally. Otherwise, nothing happens.

 

Go back and watch Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane or Touch of Evil. Those films are all about created space and the arrangement/motion of people in space, and the angles from which they are shot. All film is about this, but Welles does it better.

 

From the viewpoint of imagination, space is being created all the time.

 

During the years, 1935-1960, in New York, the so-called action painters (De Kooning, Pollock, Gorky, Kline, etc.) discovered space as a primary workable “substance” for their explorations. They were quite forceful about it. It had nothing to do with Renaissance perspective or the illusion of intentionally drawn objects that mimicked how we see the world. In action painting, subjective space was pushed to the hilt, and it disturbed many people because it challenged the comfortable sensation that space was an entirely settled issue.

 

When you create space, you create power. Yours.

 

You’re no longer simply living in the automatically delivered space of the universe.

 

The transition from heaven-based religion to the worship of the universe itself occurred because, after the deconstruction of religious myths, the simplest course of action was to claim that the space we could see all around us, or through telescopes, was holy. It was easy. And holy space would give us all we needed, without any action on our part. Passivity.

 

The philosopher-poet, Giordano Bruno, was burned to death by the Roman Church because he suggested that every soul could extend his own space infinitely and yet remain in accord with other souls. This view challenged the Church at such a fundamental level it could not go unanswered.

 

Bruno, in a real sense, was talking about imagination—and once that door is opened in the discussion, institutions fall.

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that every human has the right to pursue life, liberty, happiness, and the creation of space, time, and energy…”

 

Money is the commonly held method for creating space. If you have money, you can make space. Witness, for example, the man who works for 30 years to accumulate enough to retire and build his dream house or buy his boat, so he can sail the seas. Space.

 

If there is a revolution in store for us, it will come by reversing that formula, with enough power, so we can create the space first and then flesh it out in the world.

 

This is far more than an idle fantasy. But to make it so, people are needed who are ready and willing to go the distance.

 

I’m developing, teaching, and practicing techniques that can, in a considerable fashion, launch such an enterprise.

 

This is not a sedate undertaking. It isn’t a stroll in the park.

 

The space-time-energy of the universe could be looked at as a business deal. A guy sells you a coat. He says, “Put this on and you’ll have all the space, energy, and time you need. Why go to all the fuss of creating these things yourself? It’s like a toaster. Do you want to stand next to the stove and cook the bread on a stick over a flame, or just pop the bread in the machine, push the button, and voila…” Some day, with microwaves on the march, we may look back at stoves as religious superstitions.

 

I’m drawing attention to the fact that some sort of bargain has been struck, and no matter how you may want to mythologize it, the outcome has been framed—people believe they have always had the “toaster,” there was never a moment when they didn’t have the toaster, and therefore, the notion of creating space, time, and energy on their own seems vague, spurious, and out of reach.

 

Not so.

 

Artists prove this every day, which is one reason of many I stand up for them. They aren’t satisfied with accepting the space-time continuum as the end-all and be-all. They chafe at that prospect.

 

Underneath it all, this is why people regard artists with suspicion.

 

Why are you creating your own space and time? We have plenty of it already. Can’t you just accept that and get on with your lives?”

 

Coincidentally, this is the underlying message of secret societies: let us build reality for you.

 

It’s rather amusing to see people delve into the inner workings of these groups and yet continue to abide by “the rules of the continuum.”

 

What’s wrong with that picture? Just about everything.

 

Bypassing all the nonsense and drivel about motivation, I call it the ultimate laziness. People look around and quickly realize they’re surrounded by space, time, and energy, and they conclude there isn’t reason to create their own—and if pressed, they’ll tell as many stories as necessary to explain away their inertia. But somehow, the stories don’t do the trick. Vis-a-vis imagination, you’re either active or passive.

 

For many years now, I’ve been pointing out the advantages of pushing the “active” button.

 

The whole red-pill blue-pill story in The Matrix is, in a way, a deflection from the main event, which is: to imagine or not to imagine, to invent or not to invent, to create or not to create.

 

If we had an actual entity called psychology, instead of a watered-down cultural artifact, it would hinge on that choice, and everything in its purview would bloom from that seed.

 

Suppose, hypothetically, you found a machine that manufactures all the public space, time, and energy there is in physical reality. Suppose you somehow knew that if you turned off the machine, the continuum would shut down and utterly disappear. Suppose, finally, you also knew that when you turned the machine back on, it would smoothly pick up from where it left off, and no one would recall the “the blank period.” Would you turn off the machine and then turn it back on?

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

To donate to the nomorefakenews September fund drive and support this work, go to Paypal.com, click on the send money button, enter qjrconsulting@gmail.com and make a contribution. You don’t need your own PayPal account to do this. Many thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

THE CAPTURE OF NATURAL HEALTH

 

CAN’T WE ALL GET ALONG?”

 

THE CAPTURE OF ALTERNATIVE HEALTH

 

THE OBAMACARE MIRACLE FOR THE LOVELORN

 

THE BIG SLEEP IN ANDROID CITY

 

by Jon Rappoport

 

(with thanks to a colleague who shall, for the moment, remain nameless because I think he wants to)

 

So you start off in charge, you’re an independent operator, you don’t work inside the system, but then you figure out the system thinks it includes you, some moron must have slipped in that clause while you weren’t looking, so you go talk to him, and it’s a pretty congenial meeting, although he does come across like a company man, and then later on you get an engraved invitation to come to a party. The food is very good and the people seem reasonable in a sort of washed-out way, but the upshot is, you can come in out of the cold if you want to. They’ll take you in. You can sit in an office and make twice as much as you were making on your own. That’s what they tell you. The only thing is, you have to sign a piece of paper that says you were never born and you’re actually a desk ornament. They assure you it’s just a formality and they’ve signed the same paper, and look, it hasn’t hurt them…”

The Magician Awakes

 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2011. When I was running for a Congressional seat in 1994, I was also in the middle of a fight to preserve access to alternative health care, against FDA attack—and during that process, I was enlightened through meeting various members of the Pod People species, who had their own ideas about what health freedom meant.

 

These were high-IQ idiots who had some sort of access to politicians and academics. They were expert compromisers and sell-out artists, who saw their mission in life as something on the order of “integrating” everything they could get their hands on.

 

In coming years, they would become hangers-on at CAM, the new office of alternative health established at the National Institutes of Health. Think “seedy tout at the racetrack.”

 

CAM was, for many people, the realization of a wet dream. Finally, the federal government, gripped in a new cloud of Love, was going to admit that alternative medicine existed and could be “integrated” into “real medicine.”

 

Yes, yes. A new day was dawning. A day of recognition. A big gold star would be pinned to chests of chiropractors and naturopaths and acupuncturists. O joy.

 

You like me! You really like me!”

 

In these meetings with the Pods, I observed their loafers, their pressed jeans, their safari jackets, their carefully arranged thinning hair, their casual smiles. Holy shit, these were recent incarnations of the frat boys I had gone to college with:

 

Everything’s good. All we have to do is craft language the politicians and bureaucrats can understand and accept, and they will reach their hands across the divide, because, in the final analysis, all that separates people is a diversity of background and experience. We can integrate that.”

 

The sub-text was:

 

In the coming years, alt. medicine will be recognized. Professorships and bureaucratic jobs and positions at hospitals will spring up out of tax money, and we can dig into that stash and find cushy work, if we play our cards right. But don’t rock the boat. Don’t attack the feds. Don’t go after the FDA. Don’t be “negative.” Love may not conquer all, but it can worm its way into government budgets.

 

And that was right and true. These days, the professions of chiropractic and naturopathy and acupuncture have, at the highest levels, sold their souls to allopathic medicine and federal regulators—thinking that Obamacare, in its fine print, will protect them into the future, because they can bill for insurance, and all will be well. Therefore, for them, the fight for health freedom is over. They think they’ve actually won.

 

In the 1960s, this whole process was called co-opting. Government or big business would find ways to absorb (“integrate”) its opposition.

 

Whereas, once upon a time, the naturopaths were tough seasoned fighters who were holding government at bay and plowing ahead with the work of healing, now they have their own bureaucrats cashing checks and enlightening the young dewy-eyed generation of practitioners on how the game is played:

 

Hey, it’s all legal now, baby. Don’t sweat it. (cough, cough) I mean, we are in conference with major players at NIH, and a task force has been created to elucidate the work of two prior study groups, and in this regard we have secured ex-officio membership on a sub-committee to examine the psychological effect, on medical doctors, of reading published studies on minimal supplementation with extremely low-dose Vitamin C during the first five hours of head colds which were preceded by a tingling sensation at the back of the throat and a genital twitching in rabbits…in fact, and you’ll really like this, at the new complementary-medicine wing of a hospital in Northern Alaska, some of our fourth-year students here at the naturopathic college will be able to apply for positions as interns applying a citrus concentrate to toilets in the men’s rooms on the third floor, to assess the results, vis-a-vis germ eradication, against the old toxic cleaning solutions…”

 

And that about sums up what will happen to the chiropractors and the naturopaths and the acupuncturists up the road, a decade or so after Obamacare really swings into gear. Chiros will adjust the spines of hard cases in homeless shelters who refuse Thorazine and then publish their findings on government-issued toilet paper.

 

Gradually, the great golden promise of integration will come true, only not in the way this new brand of alt. practitioner expects.

 

I have news for the New Age Pod alt. bureaucrats. Once you’re in with the government, you’re all the way in. You take the scraps they leave on the table. You learn how to love the scraps. You primp and pump up your pretended achievements and cash your checks. That’s your role. When you’re called on to sell out further, you do it with a smile. You kiss the ring. And you come to realize your profession of natural healing has become a cartoon of itself. You live in that cartoon and you make your little speeches and mount your plaques on the office wall. When you want more money, you stand in line at the federal trough and wait. Bullshit is thy name.

 

What the Pods never learned is that, when you negotiate with your your opponents, you are you and they are they. Since that is the case, especially when you are coming from a position of relative weakness, your “victories” are wholly a function of who your opponents are and what they really want and what they are willing to do to get it, in the long, long run. Can I make it any simpler?

 

In this context, integration means you will eventually find yourself in quicksand holding a long stick, and the person on the other end of the stick will be your enemy. Then, he can re-negotiate everything. Immediately.

 

Yes, Virginia, there are enemies. They exist. They aren’t just an illusion fostered by “old discredited modes of thought.” You don’t make them vanish through some puerile trick. For starters, you don’t put any stock in their promises. Instead, to begin with, you make public their bad deeds. Come on. Wake up. This strategy goes back to the cave men. The first time it was used, a guy stopped his girl friend from marrying some oaf when he said, “Hey, Oaf Dude rolled four boulders we use for bonfires into his own cave. I’ve got him in the act on video. Look.”

 

This was my strategy when I was running for Congress. I went on the offensive against the FDA. The material at my disposal then, as now, was voluminous. It’s in the public record.

 

The Pods castigated me for my approach. They saw this as a hindrance to, yes, integration. They told me we were in a new age, and now the preferred method was extensive negotiation. Conflict resolution.

 

One night in 1994, a few months before the passage of the so-called Health Freedom Bill in Congress, which I was assured would protect us against the FDA forever, I sat in a last-ditch meeting with a dozen other people. We wanted to draft an amendment to the Bill that would nail down the protections we really needed.

 

A towering hack from UCLA, whose specialty was apparently Brainstorming and Conflict Resolution, a fat domehead who was as interested in health freedom as a scuttle fish is interested in the orbit of the moon, chaired this meeting. He had been invited in as an expert.

 

So he asked us all to introduce ourselves, one by one, and after that little excruciating exercise, he said he would write, on the blackboard behind him, each of our ideas about why this amendment was important. Well, of course, we already knew why it was important. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have come to the room in the first place.

 

I saw he was going to take a couple of hours, moving us through his hoops, to get to the heart of the matter, so I said, in my usual gracious style, “This is stupid.”

 

He looked at me. He tried to smile.

 

I said, “Let me summarize. We’re here to draft an amendment to the Hatch Bill that will give us more guarantees. We can write this sucker in twenty minutes. I will write it. Does anyone in the room want to go off and write his version? Then we can compare.”

 

One hand was raised.

 

Good,” I said. “Do it. I’ll go into this next room here and type out mine. Let’s take a break and come back in twenty minutes.”

 

So that’s what happened, and we did hash out an amendment, and of course nobody in Washington wanted to give it three seconds of time, because all the elements of the Hatch Bill had already been agreed upon, behind closed doors.

 

After our meeting, a man in the room who knew the UCLA hack came up to me and said, “You were pretty harsh there.”

 

Really?” I said. “If we’d followed his little Chinese torture technique, it would have taken us six hours to come to the same place we are now. Who did he think he was dealing with, second graders?”

 

The man frowned.

 

That’s not the point,” he said. “Brainstorming has its own style, and we needed to follow that.”

 

Why?” I said. “We already knew what we needed. We’re not building a rocket ship here.”

 

Okay,” he said, “but this meeting was supposed to be about integrating our ideas, so that, in Washington, the same spirit of integration might prevail and get us what we wanted.”

 

By osmosis?” I said. “That’s quite a leap of logic. Do you have a church?”

 

What?”

 

A church.”

 

I looked him over. He was lean and bronzed. I imagined he did push-ups under a tanning lamp in his home gym. He was crinkled around the eyes, probably from forced smiling, a practice I don’t normally advocate. His combover seemed to be threaded with minor extensions. I couldn’t be sure. He was wearing one of those bush jackets with the many pockets. His nails were done with transparent polish.

 

He wasn’t smiling now.

 

I sense a church here,” I repeated. “With a doctrine derived from As So Above, So Below. If we’re nice here tonight, ‘Washington’ will mystically pick up the vibe and be nice. Anyway, you don’t remember me, but I was with you at a meeting last month, and you were pushing for a committee to study the amendment, which would have put us so far behind schedule the Bill would have passed before we got our pencils correctly sharpened.”

 

The man blushed.

 

Don’t worry,” I said. “You’re winning. You’re going to get a gig in whatever structure comes out of this war we’re waging. You’ll always be the good guy in the room. The folks in Washington like that.”

 

And by God, he did get a gig. Within the swelling bureaucracy of alt. medicine. A series of gigs. I’m told he’s a brainstorming expert now, and when he holds meetings of his minions, he bores them so greatly a few of them want to push him out a window.

 

But he’s simultaneously for health freedom and Obamacare, and he’s for “sensible government regulations,” and he’s for cooperating with the FDA and he’s for integrating medical drugs and nutrients—judiciously, of course—and he’s for increased government inspections of organic farms and he’s for genetically modified food, with some (again, “sensible”) restrictions, and he’s for 15 rather than 33 doses of vaccines for babies, and he’s for bringing naturopaths and chiropractors and acupuncturists into the fold, and drafting new “standards of practice and external monitoring” for them.

 

I believe he calls himself, on occasion, an ex-hippie who still applies the lessons of his youth to the exigencies and realities of our time. I’m thrilled. (Integral integration with integrity.)

 

With Pods like this working for us, our job is complete. We can take heart and look forward to a new century of love, during which our great-great grandchildren will be birthed in organic oak vats where, synthetic genes imparted, they’ll bathe in a solution that delivers 40 or 50 vaccines at the moment of emergence into the world.

 

A chiropractor with an advanced degree will clean out the vat and dump the contents into a drain, mop the floor, and take out the garbage.

 

Outside the baby factory, a fully licensed government naturopath will be raking the leaves on the lawn.

 

A PhD acupuncturist who’s done post-doc work at the Mayo Clinic will be smoothing out the sand and picking up candy wrappers in the kiddies’ playpen.

 

They’ll stop working and look up as the hospital dietitian, who researches processed-food injectables, rolls by in her Mercedes.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

To donate to the nomorefakenews September fund drive and support this work, go to Paypal.com, click on the send money button, enter qjrconsulting@gmail.com and make a contribution. You don’t need your own PayPal account to do this. Many thanks.

 

 

 

THE CREATIVE CENTER AGAIN

 

THE CREATIVE CENTER AGAIN

 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2011. First, the nomorefakenews September fund drive continues. Thanks to those who’ve made a donation. See the end of this article for how you can help.

 

On both a personal and public level, boredom is the great challenge for people who live a reasonably normal life. They try to find some spark of excitement that can drive them over the top into new territory, in which adventure becomes paramount.

 

They unconsciously realize this spark has to be creative. Yet society, more and more, is arranged as compartments that fit into larger compartments.

 

If people can’t find a way to utilize imagination with power, they’ll fall back into a form of stale theater, in which they already know their roles.

 

I’ve written before about my desire to start a Creative Center, in which imagination is the core, spreading out from which painting, writing, music, and so on emerge, not from a technical point of view, but as essential expressions of self.

 

And of course, now that I’ve been writing a great deal about the Magic Theater, I see it would also become integral to the Center.

 

Meanwhile, I simply simply assume the Center is in the work I’m doing, and it is.

 

But I thought, in light of the Magic Theater, I’d come back to this notion of a geographical Center, and see what added meaning it would have.

 

It begins with the idea of The Flood. A global flood of creative action in all significant fields of human endeavor, forwarded by many people, sweeping away resistance to a future in which individuals everywhere live through and by their imagination.

 

People would come to, and go out from, the center. While there, they would immerse themselves in creativity along several fronts.

 

And, in the Magic Theater, they would enact, in dialogues, far-reaching roles that stimulate dormant energies and wake up the capacity to invent, innovate, improvise.

 

There would be no timidity about power, the power of imagination.

 

The Center takes the position that the creative impulse is primary and natural and has enormous implications for the individual. The world lives largely according to unnatural standards, but there is no compulsion to abide by its methods.

 

Nevertheless, surrounded by a civilization that urges its citizens to enter a primary role and stay there, people find themselves bound up in the separate energy compartments of their “characters,” wanting some kind of greater theater.

 

In the Magic Theater, this desire is realized. And the liberation it can achieve is stunning. Then, from that basis, entering the wider creative life of action, in the world, is more doable.

 

Under the surface of consciousness, people are actually building up a huge amount of information about characters they could play. They see these characters all around them. And they read about and watch them on their multiple screens. It’s as if they are preparing for an actor’s life—but because there is no obvious outlet, the material they gather stays put.

 

In the Magic Theater, this all changes. The fluidity and aliveness it brings is felt first-hand.

 

Therefore, in the Center, the old idea of audience listening to teacher and then participating, somewhat minimally, in group exercises, is expanded beyond the breaking point. The entire atmosphere, given the Magic Theater, is creative.

 

The Center’s goals are more far-reaching, by light years, than the seeding of a few interesting ideas to take back to home base and ruminate about.

 

These days, there are workshops in which people show up ready to act the part of “seminar goer” or “sponge soaking up knowledge.” The whole time spent is really about imprinting these characters, as if, somehow, they will result in the production of a “better person.” But all they do is place a superficial sheen on the attendee, an imitation of wisdom.

 

The Magic Theater deconstructs that in ten minutes. But not in a destructive way. It does it by proliferating roles, improvised in dialogues, to the point where the person knows, without doubt, he is taking on greater energy and power. Living energy.

 

Life does, in fact, imitate art. But merely thinking about that very interesting idea doesn’t get you very far. However, if you begin to act out and improvise far-reaching characters in the Magic Theater, you essentially make art and life at the same time.

 

And this is a new thing. It immediately interacts with aspect of self that have been hidden under a blanket, as if waiting for a such a defining moment.

 

When the moment comes, the creative impulse hears the bell ring and authentic transformations are underway.

 

Add to that some experience writing and painting, for instance, and a person suddenly begins to entertain new ideas, doable ideas for his future.

 

New space, new energy, new plans, new adventures.

 

And concomitant illumination.

 

This is a rough sketch for a Center.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

To donate to the fund drive and support this work, go to Paypal.com, click on the send money button, enter qjrconsulting@gmail.com and make a contribution. You don’t need your own PayPal account to do this. Many thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE GOALS OF LIFE

 

THE GOALS OF LIFE

 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2011. Thanks to those who have donated to the nomorefakenews fund drive so far. Your generosity is much appreciated. Details on how to make a contribution are at the end of this article.

 

Okay. Here we go.

 

A person would have a hard time counting up all the current spiritual sects, cults, and religious organizations that seek the goal of surrender.

 

Surrender in this context implies: “the individual” is really some primitive Separateness, from which one should graduate into merging with a Greater Reality.

 

The Greater Reality is variously defined as God, the universe, cosmic consciousness, collective consciousness, All One, etc.

 

The idea is that, sufficiently enlightened, the individual would see his path, up to that moment, had been restricted and confined, and the next step involves yielding his “separateness” for a far better future.

 

What has been hidden or given diminished attention is this: the evolution of the individual actually moves toward greater independence. Greater individuality. And not just independence from external forces, but from inner conditions as well; inner conditions that dictate in favor of weakness, confusion, fear.

 

A person entertains and accepts ideas and feelings that can make him less than what he is. He can mire in feelings and doubts that curtail, for example, the force of his own decision-making, the sense of his own power, the sense of his own control over his present and future.

 

Suppose a person believes his own past is a central hindrance to his life. Suppose he believes he can’t really move forward under his own power, making his own choices, because something in his past is keeping him down.

 

In that case, his full conception of his own individuality is distorted and blunted. He is in half-light, believing he is partially free and partially slave.

 

At that point, he can struggle to become freer, or he can find a philosophy that urges him to give up that quest, claiming it was always an illusion and instead, he should have been seeking ways to surrender his “separation” from Ultimate Spirit.

 

In the same way that a baby struggles to emerge from the womb, to move beyond the channel and the fluids that previously sustained him during the formative phase, evolution actually consists of freeing one’s self from the feelings and ideas that would legislate in favor of becoming “a part of a whole.”

 

Once having attained sufficient individuality, a person can go back and visit places of less freedom and operate within their contexts, much as an actor who has played King Lear can go back and participate in little plays for the kiddies—if he chooses to.

 

By “little plays for the kiddies,” I mean those environments in which people still cling to the notion that they are essentially surrendering to a Greater Reality in hopes of being absorbed in it.

 

I have seen many people who have talent give up that talent and even fail to recognize it exists, because they think they are severely limited and compromised by some elusive inner confinement.

 

And then, to top it off, they opt for connecting themselves to a philosophy that justifies surrender to “a greater Whole” as a more spiritually mature choice.

 

Whether on a political, economic, creative, or spiritual front, this is called Fascism. It can be hard or soft. Brutal or friendly.

 

But let’s leave this rather harsh discussion behind. Now we take a really adventurous step–

 

If such a person were really up for it, extended dialogues in the Magic Theater might work wonders. I’m not talking about an hour. I’m talking about many sessions in which the roles of, say, “Universal Consciousness” and “My Past” and “Separate Individual” and “Merging with the Whole” are acted out across a wide spectrum. There are electrifying possibilities here. A person PORTRAYS THESE ROLES, EMBODIES THEM, ACTS THEM, SPEAKS FROM THEM, IN DIALOGUE WITH ANOTHER PERSON.

 

Then the whole polarity of “separateness” versus “merging” breaks down and dissolves. What replaces it is THEATER.

 

Why bother to argue the merits of greater individuality versus group-inclusion, when you can break through into more power and creative force by ACTING the roles involved?

 

Playing these roles in the Magic Theater liberates all sorts of bound-up and walled-off energy. A new flexibility is attained. Spontaneity emerges.

 

This startling premise was announced to the world some 80 years ago by JL Moreno, who founded Psychodrama. The Magic Theater extends that premise by saying that existence itself can be put on a theatrical basis—and there is no limit to the number and types of roles that can be acted out. In fact, the roles eventually don’t need to have anything to do with the actors at all. At least not in any obvious sense.

 

You can have two people playing “an ant” and “a yellow phantom that dissolves galaxies.” Somewhere along the line, revelations will occur.

 

The Magic Theater plugs into the imagination, and in doing so, it brings into view miles and miles of material that was previously hidden. Or never existed.

 

For example, a person has hot flashes. She and another person play the roles of “a fence that is looking out on miles and miles of open plains” and “the reincarnation of Tesla.” Then they switch. Somewhere in all this, the hot flashes might recede. How? Who knows? It’s not a straight-line connection. It’s imagination operating at warp speed.

 

It’s about a lot of things, most of which are invisible and resolve by themselves.

 

The Magic Theater operates by allowing the imagination to enter, in the form of acting roles without limit…and in this enterprise, the action of creating and speaking from those roles widens drastically one’s relationship to reality.

 

The drugged state called normal living falls away like an old skin.

 

Here is an impossible fantasy for you. On national television, over the course of, say, three days, President Obama and an unemployed construction worker enter the Magic Theater. Their first dialogue is fairly predictable, but then they SWITCH ROLES. The construction worker is now the president and vice versa. Then they switch back. And so on and so forth. Eventually, their roles and dialogues tend more toward the archetypes of president and worker. Energies and emotions expand. The entire cliché of canned political speech disintegrates. The two men break new ground.

 

The television audience is taken far beyond its usual nodding status. Things are being said, feelings are being expressed that go beyond any format or expectation.

 

It isn’t the result that is so important; it’s the unwinding process.

 

Reality is punctured. The status quo is shaken.

 

Well, the Magic Theater has that potential, for those who are willing to participate in it.

 

Even what at first looks like a disability or deficit takes on dramatic possibilities for expression.

 

Yes, you know, I thought my life was a mess, but ‘being in a mess’ has some interesting aspects when you use it as part of a role. It’s kind of exciting…”

 

Raise the level. Expand the level.

 

What can happen is only limited by the willingness of the participants to move into an adventure.

 

Here’s another opportunity. A person is asked to consider a picture of where he would be if he attained his goals in life. He describes that place, and then he is asked to talk about what he would be like as the champion of that quest. He does that, too. Then—and here is the interesting part—he plays the role of that character in a dialogue with his “opposite,” a character who has completely failed at attaining those goals. And then they switch roles.

 

The degree of insight and liberation possible, in these dialogues, is startling.

 

The whole journey to reach goals and fulfill them (which is what everybody is doing) is cast into a THEATRICAL light.

 

In the Magic Theater.

 

We enter life, we look around, and sooner or later we decide we need to be something, and so we make that happen. This is fine, this necessary for survival, this is interesting, this is energetic, and so on, and then…as time passes, as we become more proficient in these roles, things tend to slow down. We’re on the verge of becoming a piece on a chessboard, and that doesn’t feel so good. We’re motivated to look for something else, whatever that might be.

 

It turns out we need a crash course in Living 201, because we’ve already done 101. But now, we take a unique path. We come into the Magic Theater, where roles are so abundant. We’re speaking from those roles, and soon enough the clouds part and we see we have this native talent. We can, as the Tibetan magicians discovered long ago, be many things. We can move in and out of roles. We can gain new flexibility. We can return to our original role. It’s all open. No binding rules. Energy flows. The old boredom and the stress that built up around the central part we were playing dissipates. We’re freer. We can create in new ways. We can be stronger, in the same way a sapling can outlast an old oak in a high wind. There are no limits. No limits on creative force, on imagination, on power, on magic…

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

The nomorefakenews fund drive continues. To make a donation to this work, go to www.PayPal.com, click on the send-money button, enter the email address, qjrconsulting@gmail.com, and send your contribution. Many thanks for your support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO MORE FAKE NEWS FUNDRAISER

 

NO MORE FAKE NEWS FUNDRAISER

 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2011. In my ten years as the sole owner and writer for nomorefakenews, I’ve never tried a fundraiser, but here we go, I’m doing one now.

 

Since 2000, when I launched this site, I’ve written tons of words, and most of them have been offered for free. I continue to do that. You can read them at my site, or you can sign up for the email list and receive them in your inbox almost every day.

 

I was blogging long before the word came into use. I also was carrying out investigations, and providing unique information on deep medical fraud, politics behind the scenes, and many other current subjects.

 

Of course, my main thrust is imagination, creative power, and magic, and this information, too, is unique.

 

So now I’m letting you know that you can support the site and my work. You can buy products listed in the site store, or simply, through PayPal, make a donation, in order to keep the work going.

 

If you see value in the work, and you prefer it to TV, newspapers, mainstream thought, and caches of online hubs, consider donating.

 

Go to www.PayPal.com, click on the “send money” link, then enter the email address, qjrconsulting@gmail.com That gets you into my account. Then enter a sum of $$. You don’t have to have your own PayPal account to donate.

 

My strategy, over the last ten-plus years is the following: take things to the limit, and then go beyond the limit. Find and transmit the knowledge that makes a difference vis-a-vis human potential, the potential of the individual. Don’t settle for what I’ve already discovered. Go farther. Don’t water it down. Don’t talk down. Talk up. Frontiers are only interesting as long as they are the edge. When one edge has been covered, find a new edge.

 

At times, I’ve considered trying to “discover a happy medium.” I’ve considered “making my work more respectable” for the masses. I’ve considered creating a few slogans and turning them into a bandwagon I then try to load people on to. I’ve considered finding a few popular themes and hammering on them with mindless repetition, so I’ll be “better understood.”

 

Each time, I’ve said no. I’ve rejected those approaches. They stand for everything I abhor, because the people I would reach in that way are not the people I’m looking for. Nor am I looking for that person within myself. I came to the internet because I saw it as a way to publish everything I couldn’t publish as a working reporter.

 

I still have a passion for the work. It increases and clarifies over time. I have many projects I’m bringing to fruition, aside from my site. It would be lovely to have a billionaire step forward and offer major resources—at which point I, in turn, would offer everything I do as open source. Free. Seminars, books, lectures, DVDs, The Magic Theater, etc. But in the absence of that, I reach out to you.

 

I’ve lived three or four lifetimes in my last ten years on the internet. Things have happened that are truly remarkable. And it’s not slowing down. People from all over the planet are responding to the work. It’s very gratifying.

 

Each day is a fresh beginning, filled with as many possibilities and realities as I can discover and invent. I’m setting no limits and I know there are no limits.

 

That is my m.o. That’s how I operate. No holds barred.

 

This fundraiser will run through the end of September. I won’t be posting a giant thermometer indicating how much money has come in, but I will mention the fundraiser in my articles.

 

And with your help, moving forward will be a little easier.

 

Thanks,

Jon

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

RECOVERING THE ENERGY

 

RECOVERING ENERGY

 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2011. After writing about the Magic Theater, I’m figuring out plans for a seminar, how it can best be done, the setting, etc. Meanwhile, I continue to expand on the subject…

 

In the course of a normal person’s life, he attributes power, and therefore, energy, to things, processes, and people outside himself—increasingly so as he grows older.

 

This is laughingly called maturity or realism.

 

Actually, the process is mostly carried on subconsciously. Therefore, the person doesn’t quite understand what has happened to his own energy. He just knows he has less of it.

 

Of course, the basic premise here is that he has a certain finite quantity of energy, and in attributing it to Others, he loses a corresponding amount.

 

I find out that Others have a lot more energy than I thought they did, so I have less…”

 

Which is absurd, because he can produce new energy.

 

In the Magic Theater, it’s so interesting when the person plays the role of someone to whom he has attributed a great deal of power. All of a sudden, he IS that person and he begins to experience the lost power and energy again, as he speaks FROM that character.

 

It’s a reversal. And quite often, a revelation.

 

We look out at the universe and we see and feel enormous energy there. But we make a comparison: all that energy THERE; much, much, less energy HERE. This literally sets the stage for our conception of our own role—a lower energy role. A role in a much smaller space.

 

This is the machination so many people fail to understand. We create the dimensions of the stage on which we perform our lives.

 

I fit inside the world. I fit inside the universe.”

 

There is this large, large space, and I live inside it in a tiny area.”

 

Yes, you do, as soon as you define your role that way.

 

But how could one define it otherwise, except as a vague intellectual proposition?

 

BY TAKING NEW ROLES.

 

BY ENTERING INTO THEATER.

 

BY ASSUMING A ROLE OF GREAT SPACE AND ENERGY.

 

THEATRICALLY.

 

And this is where dialogue is so important. When you SPEAK FROM such a large role, old defining and limiting energy configurations in consciousness break up. They no longer apply in the same way. They were there to bolster the much smaller role. That’s how we define our roles—by creating interior spaces and energy boundaries and shapes to cement in the roles.

 

There is nothing intrinsic in universe or ourselves that implies boundaries around what we can become or do. It may seem that way, but that’s the trick we play on ourselves.

 

None of this has anything to do with biology or brain paths or genes or the body per se. It has to do with conception, how we conceive of what we can do. The scope of it. The size of it. The energy of it.

 

The energy-projection exercises I offer in Mind Control, Mind Freedom, and The Transformations, if practiced on a consistent basis, can revolutionize that conception.

 

Look at the manmade myths of ancient societies. Apollo, Venus, Ra, flying dragons, Krishna, on and on—these are all figures of great power. People attribute power to them and then, correspondingly, invent stories about their own severely limited power. How convenient.

 

Breaking the chains…enter the Magic Theater, where you can play Apollo, Venus, Ra, the dragon. Where you can enter into a dialogue and speak as those figures of power.

 

I’m always amused when someone says, OH I COULDN’T DO THAT. Really? Are you kidding? What do you think you’re doing when you pay ten bucks and walk into a theater and watch an action/fantasy film up there on the big screen? Do you really believe those characters, those moving images have life independent of what you give them there in the dark? Do you really think you’re not momentarily merging with the heroes and becoming them? When you go to a concert, do you think you’re not merging with the music?

 

These are “becoming exercises,” and a thousand years ago, Tibetan magicians were practicing them every day.

 

To extend the practice, now, you enter the Magic Theater and actually SPEAK AS AND FROM those characters.

 

And now we come to an interesting crux. Because you see, people do merge with “roles of power” but they don’t want to admit that. They want to keep that fact in the dark. They want to do it secretly. They think admitting what they’re doing would be embarrassing. As adults, they’re supposed to be beyond that.

 

But who invented those roles and figures of power in the first place? Children? No. Adults.

 

Without too much of a stretch, you could say that adults invent the space and dimensions of their own lives by secretly projecting power to various other “greater personages”…and then living out the consequences of that action. Adults project power, in order to convince themselves they have no power. Yet another absurdity in a long string of absurdities.

 

Which is better? This dim charade, or the hyper-real magic theater, in which we finally speak as the power we have surrendered?

 

I once worked with a family, where the power relationships were causing all sorts of problems. So we went into theater. I staged a series of dialogues, in which the kids and the parents played each other. It was touch and go for a while, and then the whole thing turned into comedy. The dialogues were quite extraordinary, as these people turned out to be fine actors. They knew each others’ roles perfectly. You could feel the energies shooting around the room, and the laughter was explosive. Finally, when the whole thing settled down, the people realized, as the son said, “we’re all crazy.”

 

But not anymore. Father and mother assumed their rightful positions, the kids fell into line—but without force or threats. It wasn’t abject slavery or anything resembling it. Each person had become stronger and smarter. Each person was certainly freer. The right people were making decisions in the right situations. The daughter, in particular, underwent a personal revolution, after she played the role of her mother in the dialogues. The mother had basically been the tyrant in charge, and the daughter loved playing her. When the mother saw herself reflected back at her, through her daughter, she calmed down and dropped her “dictatorship of fear.”

 

The daughter told me she finally understood why her mother had turned into a monster—because somebody had to take charge in the family that was becoming an out-of-control mob. The father got the most out of playing his rebellious son, and told me he loved that part. But now he didn’t need it. He could actually be a father.

 

The two kids and the two parents were able to become a family, because nobody was claiming the others had all the power. That had been worked out through dialogue. It had been experienced. All four people had been power hungry, and at last the hunger had been satisfied. They got that message.

 

The last I heard, the mother was wearing, at Sunday dinners, a T-shirt that said I USED TO BE A MONSTER AND IT WAS GRAND. They built little dolls of each other and burned them in effigy. They told me it was an occasion for much joy and glee. I’m sure Child Protective Services, had they known, would have arrested the parents and sent the kids straight into foster care. But that’s the difference between the play called Government Bureaucracy and what can happen in the Magic Theater. Most people just wouldn’t understand. So be it.

 

Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com