A new point about the missing virus

by Jon Rappoport

June 8, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

(Episode 11 of Rappoport Podcasts — “Mass Shootings and the Psychiatric Drug Connection; The Involvement of the CIA’s MKULTRA Mind Control Program” — is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)


Actually, this is a point I’ve made before, but now I’m boiling it down to the bare essentials.

Here we go:

If you were a) honest and b) the head of a major public health agency, there is something you would do, before declaring COVID a worldwide pandemic requiring extraordinary measures (e.g., lockdowns).

You would carry out a study.

A study to confirm that a newly discovered virus (SARS-CoV-2) really exists and is causing illness and death on a global scale.

After all, that is the claim. So wouldn’t you want to prove it’s true? Wouldn’t you feel compelled to do that—rather than just SAY it’s so?

This study wouldn’t focus on 20 or 30 or 50 patients. Those numbers are far too small. We’re not talking about the assertion of a minor viral outbreak. This is supposedly a titanic disaster.

You would gather together a few thousand people, at minimum.

All these people have been diagnosed with the purported pandemic infection.

You would take tissue samples from these patients and analyze them. You would test them for the presence of the new virus.

How could you NOT?

—And yet, such a study WAS NEVER DONE.

NEVER.

Try making excuses for that omission.

We’re talking about science on such a basic level, a child would understand it. You say X is causing a global pandemic—so test for the presence of X. Test for it in a sufficient number of people. Immediately.

Since you’re claiming more than a billion people could become infected, surely you should test at least a few thousand people, to make sure you’re right.

THIS WAS NEVER DONE as one complete study.

Now, we could certainly argue about the kind of test you should run to see if the virus is present. Is the test accurate? Is it reliable? Is it relevant? Of course. I’ve covered that subject exhaustively. But here I’m putting all that aside. The point is, you WOULD test for the virus.

Even the staunchest most rabid defenders of the existence of SARS-CoV-2 would have to agree, if they were being honest.

In other articles, I’ve offered much proof that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist—but here I’m just making the most basic of points: RUN THE STUDY, DO THE TEST.

So what do I get in the way of replies from the “defenders?” They completely ignore the need for the wide-ranging study I’m demanding; and instead they persist in offering up small studies that focus on three patients, 40 patients—as if that is sufficient for declaring a global pandemic and wreaking massive destruction, by lockdowns and other measures.

They keep insisting these little minor studies are sufficient. Why? Because that’s all they have. So they pretend they’re doing good science.

They’re not.

They’re faking it.

Some of them know they’re faking it.

Here’s an analogy anyone should be able to understand. Putting aside lying and cheating and fabricating in doing studies, when a company wants to gain approval from the FDA for a new drug or a new vaccine, how many people do they enroll in their clinical trials, to prove safety and efficacy?

THOUSANDS.

Not three, or 50.

Pfizer enrolled 30,000 people in their clinical trial of the RNA COVID vaccine.

Why didn’t they just enroll 40?

Because they couldn’t get away with it.

I’m talking about standard research practice here.

So why doesn’t the same standard practice apply to proving the existence of a virus that is supposedly causing widespread illness and death across the world?

The rabid defenders of the virus also try to make this point: since millions and millions of people have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, this proves the virus exists and is causing terrible damage.

This is what I call “after the fact” proof.

By that standard, Pfizer would have been able to market its COVID vaccine without any clinical trials at all.

No. The proof required for a major medical/scientific assertion comes WHEN THE ASSERTION IS FIRST MADE, before all sorts of brutal measures are taken that are based on that assertion.

The rabid defenders of the virus twist and distort science to fit their agenda—and then claim OF COURSE everybody knows the virus exists.

You buy what they’re selling at your own peril. They have their story and they’re telling it over and over.

They’re naked, walking in the rain, pitching you raincoats.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


To read Jon’s articles on Substack, click here.


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

22 comments on “A new point about the missing virus

  1. whatistrue90 says:

    I know one man who say: the virus existed, but it is no more.

    Because it has mutated, and it is weak, and was not a problem since the summer of ’20.

    He is, of course, a Doctor.

    He still says that the virus was bad at the beginning. But I’ve cathed him a few times in these two years. He knows there was not a virus. But he cannot say it.

    He is a good doctor because has been against the pandemic “measures” two years. He said it was bad for families, for the people. No benefit from any of that. He was right about that.

    Yet, he failed to save people from the propaganda, from the poison. He tried to speak as clearly as possible, without risking his license. He was censored, intimidated and threatened. He did not budge. But he failed to save more people, to convince more people to not submit.

    I used to agree with him. But his strategy has failed.

    I do not know what to do now. He was my last point of support.

    Perhaps, buying fundamental lies from the enemy is a failing strategy.

    The few good doctors that were against this monstrosity still say that the “classical” vaccines are still useful. It is incredible.

    They are not free to research and speak the truth, because they want to keep their job. They pretend they are not working for the mob.

    Poor people. How weak they have always been, and how much pain they are being inflicted upon, because of that very weakness.

    There are even people who pretend to convince me that the politicians and the TV stars did let themselves get posioned. How dumb these people can be?

    No. Playing virus has not helped. It hurts me to admit it. But it is true.

    Never engage in appeasment strategies with sociopaths.

  2. Jerry Kelly says:

    It goes deeper than that. They didn’t even just “SAY” it. If you watch/listen to when it happened at 2:19 of this video, there is no “We hereby declare…”. There is only the announcement that someone has made the assessment that something can be characterized as a pandemic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbT6AANFOm4

    He then immediately launches into admonition regarding using the word lightly, bla bla bla. Right after he used the word! Did he use it lightly by merely suggesting that C19 was a pandemic? Who characterized it as a pandemic? He left that OUT. Whoever wanted to characterize it as a pandemic DID.

    My personal rule about when speakers of English use the passive construction (e.g. “can be characterized”) is to wait for the speaker to say “…by so and so” so that I hear who did or could do the action. If they don’t say that, then they are CONVENIENTLY leaving open who did or could do the action (this is all no pun intended about who WHO is) and moving on with business or whatever it is they habitually do to pass their time.

    This whole passive construction thing has been completely obsessing me for almost a decade – probably longer – mostly because scientific research makes using the passive almost a rule. There’s nothing inherently wrong with using it, but I wonder about the cumulative implications of using it and reading it and hearing it. Over the years I have changed my “programming” when it comes to “processing” instances of it in my own thinking, speaking, listening and reading of it. It has put me into a seemingly needlessly narrow universe. And then IT HAPPENED in March of 2020.

    No one even declared a pandemic! No one even merely said it without conducting and pointing to the research you rightly say is necessary. THEY MERELY SUGGESTED IT. And here we are. And there they are.

    • Jim S. Smith says:

      Well gee!

      Isn’t that the story of most politics – a bunch of “seems that”, “is likely”, “may cause”, etc, etc, etc? ? ?

      The operative term for these conjectures is: “WEASEL-WORDS”.

  3. Fleur says:

    Well said, straight to the point!

  4. Fleur says:

    They’re naked, walking in the rain, pitching you raincoats.

    Nice one 🙂

  5. DL says:

    Exactly! Right on! You would have to do viral cultures and that takes tooooo long! Instead the PCR test by Drosten was already ready to go, ready to use to gin up the numbers! And the fear, and the compliance they sought…

    They expected us to ‘follow the science’ fiction…

    Sadly, many did

  6. Tracy Kolenchuk says:

    Proof doesn’t sell vaccines. “Preventatives are better than cures.” (more profitable). If we had proof that the virus is responsible for deaths, we might try to cure. If try to cure we might realize how many ways there are to cure COVID. But, we don’t try to cure COVID – that’s bad for profits driven by prevention.

    • Jim S. Smith says:

      – “Sick patients, mean more profits.”

      – “A healthy patient, is a lost opportunity for profit.”

      THAT’s the very basis that “doctors’ offices”, “medical clinics”, AND “hospitals” operate under.

      Your good health comes dead last on that list of priorities!

      • NC says:

        Allopathy is not a Healthcare System

        It is a system of Disease Maintenance.

        Their textbooks (I have read many) say nothing about health…they only mention dis-ease…

        They even admit in the books that they have no idea what is the cause of disease.

        The Medical Cartel is a racket…and it works…for them…

        • Theo says:

          Allopathy is a symptom-suppressor management system using poisons

          First Aid (including surgery) given in response to blunt force trauma is wound management system

          Clean nutritious food, clean water, proper exercise, and proper sleep is a health management system

  7. Roger welsh says:

    Anyone who has listened/watched Dr David Martin step by step explain the fraud of the non existent virus, cov19.

    No naturally occurring organism can have a patent.

    Cov19 does

    First submitted in 2003!! Granted in 2015!

    • Jim S. Smith says:

      Just be careful of Dr. David Martin.

      He DOES get some things “wrong” too.

      He still supports the “vaccination orthodoxy” – although not the current “vaccines”.

  8. NaturalGal says:

    Jon, excellent article! I’ve been saying this from the get-go.

    Whatistrue90 and Jerry Kelly, excellent and insightful comments. Wearing masks, distancing, lockdowns and even getting sick and calling it covid is appeasing the psychopaths. Yet so many friends refuse to see it, even if they think all but calling it covid is nonsense.

    However, there is hope. Just today, a close-minded neighbor was telling me about all the nonsense they must go through to travel despite having all the jabs and boosters. I told him I was just going to say it straight out–the whole thing is fraud. To my surprise, he said he was beginning to think that, too. This from a couple who ordered replacement windows that were installed during the fakedemic and followed around the workers making mental notes of everything they touched so they could disinfect it all after they left.

    Perhaps this has drug on so long to give the stupids time to wake up.

  9. William R Hall Jr says:

    No virus exposes the doctors as the crooks and murderers that they are. All the suffering they have caused in the name of the virus is beyond forgivable. We trusted them with our lives and they stabbed us in the back. Thugs and killers all of them.
    The doctors are criminal scum and deserve to have every bone in their hands broken with a hammer!!!!!!!!!

  10. Roundball Shaman says:

    “And yet, such a study WAS NEVER DONE. NEVER.”

    You don’t need a study when you have already arrived at your conclusions (and your ‘solutions’) FIRST. Just a waste of time and money to do anything further. It’s all going to come out one way anyway… so why bother with needless details?

    This is yet another layer of bad actors with bad intent, and another layer of abusing and belittling We the People. We don’t count, so why would They do things to make it look like we do?

    These Predators have no conscience. The likely have no soul. If They had one, it was long ago sold off to The Devil at The Crossroads of Bare-Naked-Obscene-Profit-Street and Do-Plenty-Of-Harm-Avenue.

    Conscience? Desire for truly proper protocols? Commitment to Do No Harm?

    Naw… Can’t lose what you never had.

    When one has lost their connection to the rest of the human family… when one has taken on the dark spirit of demons… when one has no modifiers to control Their negative and wicked predatory impulses… then bad things happen very quickly. No filters.

    The Predator Foxes have an open door to the spooked and quivering We-the-People
    Chickens huddling in the Chicken Coop while we wait for their eventual eviction and our place as their main course in their mouths to provide sustenance to The Demon Class.

    They don’t need a study to deal with us.

    And we don’t need a study to know what we are dealing with in THEM.

    They might be pitching us raincoats. But we might be wielding rain umbrellas. And one can find other places for umbrellas to go other than over one’s head in the rain.

  11. Opie Poik says:

    The prime issue here, and anywhere and anytime, the ninja pressure point, the cornerstone, the critical locus of power structures, is still, and has ever been and always will be, mass compliance.

    Many take issue with particular features of a dominant paradigm, a narrative, a system, an institution; but never with the underpinnings of any system, which always consist of: collectivism, tribalism, wide agreement on general principles, rules, rituals, customs, procedures, fees, licensure, requirements, offices, titles, ceremonies, etc.

    Whole systems are never questioned or challenged seriously; total abandonment of failing, inoperative, or retrograde structures is always shunned as unworkable, dangerous, insane, and extreme (which is true, relatively speaking, since accepted and codified norms define what is extreme, as any serious challenge to the establishment).

    The desire to be seen as reasonable and level-headed is the ultimate support for the very system that so many rightly perceive as unworkable, and is the very mechanism whereby no material change ever takes place.

    This collective, tribal mindset, has always, and always will, empower the ruling class and their beloved institutions, and leave the masses in the squalor that has defined human history so far. We have free will; agency – so our repeated, lockstep, collective mindset is the true oppressor: not any of the oligarchical tyrants. Without our support, they evaporate.

    “We have met the enemy, as he is us.” ~ Walt Kelly

  12. From Elsewhere says:

    https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    Pfizer knew, WHO knew, FDA, CDC… and people slept, while under Tv sedation. However, some speak out, even now, when it’s late. http://www.francesoir.fr/politique-monde/sommet-mondial-sur-le-covid-17-000-scientifiques-appellent-mettre-fin-l-etat-d

  13. Metaphysical Jerk says:

    Why to look for the virus in 1000 people if they didn’t find it in those 3 or 50 people?

    They looked at the cytopathic effects like nerds, without control experiments, and then they created the combination of the four letters with computer programs.

    And why to even bother to look for the virus, or for any pathogenic particle, if contagion between people has never been shown to exist?

    First of all, contagion should be proofed. They must show if saliva can transmit the illness. This is the most important thing. All the measures are based on the idea of people as saliva shooters. If contagion via saliva is proofed, then they could look for something specific in the saliva that is responsible for the transmission. A “virus”, bacteria, or any fluid or particle. Because saliva of an ill person could be contagious, and if this is the case, they are not obliged to find a pathogenic particle.

    But if saliva is not contagious, what on earth are we talking about?

    It is all about saliva.

    The fact that they don’t do experiments with saliva gives us a clue.

  14. JamesS says:

    Dr. Cowan has pointed to the papers written by the pioneers of virology that all other causes of disease must be ruled out first and the sample from the sick patient must be purified within the 2% allowable limit. So far no one has followed those steps. The only counter to that which I got is simply claims that virologists don’t have to do it. That’s it. One has scientific literature to back it up the other is someone’s words that I’m suppose to trust.

  15. Ed says:

    The virus is fake but all the school shootings are real…lol

  16. William in Ajax says:

    If the masks work, why do I have to be vacinated?
    If the vaccine works as its supposed to, why do i have to wear a mask?
    If Masks and the vaccine work as advertised, why hide the Ivermectin?
    or
    How many people do you know with Polio, who have taken 2 vaccine shots and a booster and still caught Polio? How many?

  17. Space cowboy says:

    When this scam first started for about a week I made no judgement. Then I learned everyone who died of pneumonia was deemed to have died of “Covid”. The most historically common cause of death was ruled to have been evidence of Covid. The bacteria which precipitate pneumonia are ever present in your lungs. When you get weak enough you succumb to pneumonia. So that’s how you test for a “pandemic”, you declare the most common cause of death to be evidence of a new horribly lethal virus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *