“Viruses can’t be isolated, but isolation is unnecessary”; another ridiculous claim from those who insist on saying SARS-CoV-2 exists

by Jon Rappoport

October 12, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

There are two types of virologists.

First, those who claim they’re isolating viruses. I’ve written many articles debunking their absurd stance. They define isolation as “swimming in a soup of many substances and never separated from the soup.” In other words, these virologists define isolated as un-isolated. You could call this Orwellian Scientific Newspeak. Sheer nonsense.

Then there are “the more sophisticated” virologists who say, “Viruses can only live in liquid inside a cell. Therefore, they can never be separated from the cell or the liquid. To demand isolation is to ask for the impossible. We can discover the genetic sequences of these viruses without isolating them. Forget isolation. Discovering the genetic sequences proves the viruses exist.”

Let’s examine this second brand of virology.

Let’s go back to the moment when scientists decided viruses existed for the first time. After all, THEY made the original claim. The burden of proof was on THEM. And they made that decision long before there was a procedure called genetic sequencing.

If isolation is impossible, if these viruses swim forever in liquid inside cells, un-isolated, then HOW DID SCIENTISTS FIRST DISCOVER VIRUSES EXIST?

On what basis did they make the claim?

Through direct observation? Certainly not, if the viruses can never be separated from the liquid in which they swim.

“We first discovered the existence of viruses that can’t be isolated by…”

By what? Singing songs? Talking to an ancestor of Antony Fauci? Finding out how much money was in the bank accounts of the Rockefeller family?

“No, look. Here’s the way it works. NOW we say isolation of viruses is impossible, because people are accusing us of not isolating them. But THEN, way back in time when scientists discovered the existence of viruses for the first time, they knew viruses HAD TO EXIST.”

“How did they know that?”

“Because all other explanations for why people were getting sick with certain diseases didn’t work, fell short.”

“I see. So there was only ONE other possibility. Viruses.”

“That’s right.”

“Do you realize what a ridiculous position that is?”

“No comment.”

And that’s really the end of the story. There was no “original discovery” of viruses. There was only an assumption backed up by nothing.

And NOW, when virologists claim they don’t need to isolate viruses because they can lay out their genetic sequences, another ridiculous situation arises. HOW DO YOU ANALYZE THE STRUCTURE OF SOMETHING YOU CAN’T ISOLATE?

How do you describe the structure of a thing when you don’t have the thing?

You DON’T describe the structure. You PRETEND you do.

You refer to other structures which themselves are only pretenses, and you pick out pieces of those pretended structures and you cobble them together, and you say, “Here it is. Here is the genetic sequence.”

This would be like a shop owner holding out his empty hand to the mafia thugs who showed up to collect their protection money for the week. The owner says, “Here’s your four hundred dollars. Can’t you see it?”

After a thug pulls out his gun, the store owner opens his wall safe and takes out strange bills and hands them over. The bills are pieces of money from the game called Monopoly. They’re pieces from American, French, German, Italian, Spanish Monopoly money, taped together.

And THAT’S called genetic sequencing of viruses. Funny money.

I’ll cover two more points. As Dr. Tom Cowan has stated, according to the conventional hypothesis of virus infection, viruses must be breaking out of cells and traveling to other cells. Otherwise, how can infection spread throughout the body? But this description assumes that viruses CAN live and thrive outside the liquid in cells.

Therefore, the claim that viruses can’t be isolated because they always live in liquid inside cells is false.

Which would bring us back to the first type of virologist, the one who says he IS isolating viruses—but can’t prove it, because his definition of isolation is, “swimming inside soup and never separated from the soup.”

And finally, what about electron microscope photos which purport to show isolated viruses? This is a subject fraught with conflict and misunderstanding. It is far from settled science. Many so-called viruses in these photos are cells that are “budding,” as if something has not yet, but is about to break out of the cell. Virologists will arbitrarily call these somethings viruses, without visual proof.

Then there are exosomes, “microvesicles released by cells in both physiological and pathological situations.” They are mistaken for viruses. There is other genetic material which can be misidentified as viruses.

People who wish to explore this thorny problem should read the works of Harold Hillman, a foremost critic of electron microscopy methods, who was exiled from the scientific community for his findings. Hillman once wrote: “Electron microscopists have ignored the dictates of solid geometry and most of the apparent structures they have detected are artefacts of their preparation procedures…” In other words, the techniques of electron microscopy create artificial entities which are then mistaken for natural entities.

Brian Martin, emeritus professor of social sciences at the University of Wollongong, Australia, writes, “In one case, Hillman gave a talk to a large audience at what he calls ‘a well known Welsh university’. The many undergraduates in the audience seemed sympathetic to his case. A lecturer stood up and claimed to have pictures from an electron microscope which showed that Hillman was wrong. After the talk, Hillman asked the lecturer to see the pictures. ‘I have not got any’, he said, laughing. ‘Why did you say you had in front of that large audience?’ ‘Because I did not want the students to be misled by you’.”

And that concludes today’s episode of Two Schools of Virology, Both Wrong, brought to you by NIH Paper Towels, the brand that mops up every spill but somehow never traps a virus.

Harold Hillman folder: click here.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

59 comments on ““Viruses can’t be isolated, but isolation is unnecessary”; another ridiculous claim from those who insist on saying SARS-CoV-2 exists

  1. DSKlausler says:

    The Invisible Rainbow; Arthur Firsternberg

  2. Rick in Phoenix says:

    Well, I’m a piano player, not a microbiologist but Andrew Kaufman drew attention to exosomes early on during the first 2-week shutdown in March 2020. I liked his analysis. Jon wrote above:

    Then there are exosomes, “microvesicles released by cells in both physiological and pathological situations.” They are mistaken for viruses. There is other genetic material which can be misidentified as virus

    Rick continues- I never read where there is other genetic material mistaken for a virus– only the exosomes and there ARE microphotos for those. When you compare the cartoon-illustration of coronavirus with the microphotos of corona virus, it’s a pretty close match.

    The idea that the virus has not been isolated does indeed have validity but it’s not a convincing argument when micrographs of exosomes related to all kinds of diseases abound on image-search-engines… which are exosomes- which in turn are connected with terrain theory by Beauchamp, a contemporary of Pasteur who promoted germ theory.

    Furthermore, we’re going in circles on this idea of isolation or exosomes anyway because today’s issue is the injection of the poison they’re falsely calling covid vaccines. Orwell.city follows the Delgado lab which is discovering nano-graphene-oxide nGrOx in the injectables as well as moving strings that appear to be alive. This would explain the low-temp preservation required inititally. There is reactivity of nGrOx with electricity because nGrOx is a superconductor.

    The Biden 9/9 call for companies over 100 employees to require jab-for-job was this era’s 9/11 — and the economic impact resulting shows that that was an act of war. The blackmail jab-for-job is war and act of terror and military tribunals must be the next step in an amped up active, not passive, resistance campaign now.

    Virus or no virus, exosomes or no exosomes, the injections, swabs and masks must stop immediately.

    • Raven says:

      This was totally on point, thank you. Have you seen the video lecture by Dr. Franc Zalewksi on the hydra he found in the Pfizer vials? This fills in some blanks, like the extreme temperature and placebo issues. You’ll have to find it on Bitchute, too much truth for YouTube.

      • Amanda says:

        Do you have a link? I couldn’t find it. I did a search on bitchute for “Dr Franc Zalewski” and for “hydra pfizer vials”- nothing came up.

        • RSBP says:

          Here is link for that and a bunch of other info that corroborates this. Not for the faint of heart. Also reason why ivermectin works because this is a parasite – no such critter as a virus exists.


          • Myles says:

            As per Terrain Theory – parasites are attracted to the dis ease, they are cleaners, akin to ‘germs’.

            Ivermectin, yet another fallacious ‘drug’ brought to us by the harmaceutical industry.

            Ivermectin does not *cure* you of the dis ease you have – it only ‘treats’ (provides candy) for the ‘parasite’ (cleaner).

            Thusly providing the illusion of health. We generally call this ‘remedy’ a *suppressant*.

            This is what happens when you take cough ‘medicine’.

            You *suppress* your ability to heal, and also your ability to ‘feel’ the symptoms of detoxification you are displaying.

            Begs the question – where do these ‘suppressed’ toxins go?

            The answer: cancer and degenerative late life dis ease.

            There is but one cure for covid. Regaining true Health.

      • Rick in Phoenix says:

        When I first saw that low temp preservation angle, I was so sure that there had to be a life form in that vax that I made note of it on my own blog and emailed the cryonics companies that I’ve been a member of in the past, Cryonics Institute in Michigan and Alcor in Phoenix where I am. As well, TransTime in the Bay Area. No feedback from any of them– typical in this era. Crickets.

        I asked a pharamacist at Walgreens if the vax she has there is stored cold. She said they’re on dry ice. Off the top of my head, I don’t know the negative Farenheit numbers but they’re in the area of -90 I think. The pharmacist was a good looking young woman and I was professional in my demeanor but when I asked how long it’s been stored- which is an issue– she gave me a cold shoulder like a typical covid cultist… cold shoulder get it? haha… and her responses became too terse to gain anything more.

        So the extreme temp was not a fill in the blank for me. I suspected a life form right away. In case you’re not familiar with cryonics, we store people at liquid nitrogen temps of -320F in hopes of future reanimation. Human embryos have been frozen and thawed and implanted and raised… and now live among us. No human has been resurrected yet as planned however– too complicated yet.

    • Kathleen Donnelly says:


    • Mos Craciun says:

      @Rick “I never read where there is other genetic material mistaken for a virus…”

      Please read : Jeff Green — ” The Age of Deception “

  3. Bernardo Paratore says:

    Thank you for the brilliant article and the Hillman materials.

  4. ReluctantWarrior says:

    The greatest threat to humanity, at this stage of our arrested development, is the virus of fear which thrives in isolation! This is well known to the Masters of the Universe and they are using it as a key part of their population reduction agenda. It is soft murder but murder nonetheless. The most effective way to counter it is to be brave and embrace life seeking the road to freedom that lies within.

    “Farewell the wasteland
    Of others fondest expectations,
    Fly into the night,
    Blaze your own fiery trail
    Through thy broken heart”

    At the end of this fiery trail is the true promised land.

    “Dostoevsky said once, ‘There is only one thing I dread: not to be worthy of my sufferings.’ These words frequently came to my mind after I became acquainted with those martyrs whose behavior in camp, whose suffering and death, bore witness to the fact that the last inner freedom cannot be lost. It can be said that they were worthy of their sufferings; the way they bore their suffering was a genuine inner achievement. It is this spiritual freedom — which cannot be taken away — that makes life meaningful and purposeful.” — Viktor Frankl

  5. Sean says:

    I think I get it. Because we are getting very tired of their ongoing stage play, there will eventually be a third type of virologist.

  6. Phillip Rodokanakis says:

    Jon, I’ve been following you for a while and I greatly appreciate your very informative newsletters.

    Are you saying in this article that viruses do not really exist? I mean if they cannot be isolated, what proof do we have that viruses are real?

    If so, what are all these labs doing that are getting these grants to study viruses? It’s now pretty much accepted that Covid-19 was a virus that was generated from the gain of function experiments that took place at the Wuhan lab and funded by Fauci. If so, what did they work with if they hadn’t isolated a virus to begin with?

    I would appreciate if you could answer these questions.


    • Gretchen says:

      Gretchen says:

      This is about genocide. However they can do it. Whatever they have to say or even act like they are admitting to, “our gain of function experiment escaped” to keep the jab program in operation. As long as the perception of people’s health being at risk and the deadly jabs keep getting into unsuspecting or desperate people they are on schedule with their evil.

      The only concern people should have is losing our entire country over a fraud that is 100% exposed and we can win if we all wake up in time.

      The false claim of a contagion or an infection from what they are identifying as viruses has been going on for decades duping (most) all of us. Since they cant risk availing themselves to public debate with differing opinions, they will keep on fooling people until those people do their own research.

      Here are a few links about viruses, a topic that we were all (including Fauci ) mis-taught about, since Louis Pasteur.

      “47 page brief on covid-19”

      “Viral Misconceptions”

      “Beginning and end of corona virus”

    • misha says:

      Labs are for “vaccine” develop. There are no virus inside any of the vaccines , there are no virus . The virus only exist in the imaginary world. Its a concept well placed under the iceberg of our head since 100 years. Profit and controll-

      Be careful with Secret Labs, mortal viruses, sound much like netflix series right ? Its all programming.

      They try to keep all in that belief. They try to push “denials” to the same place, dont believe it was a natural virus , ok lab virus, then take the vaccine, just in case… As Jon allways said, there is a looooot of misinformation like in the Aids scam with its phantom nonexisting hiv, so we need to keep very focus.

      Also in youtube and facebook you can still post regarding faucci labs and virus from labs without censorship…. strange 🙂

  7. Eddie says:

    “In other words, the techniques of electron microscopy create artificial entities which are then mistaken for natural entities.”

    Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say the techniques create *optical illusions*?

    • I concur. The black magicians have one power only: To create ILL-usions, and captivating ones at that. Then they mind-control and pay-off a bunch of soulless or just plain stupid people to prop up the illusions. Cushy-job-holders and their beLIEvers are giving energy through attention — both fear and EXCITEMENT — to feed the dark occultists’ illusions. So yes, all of their technology supports the creation of, and USERS’ EXCITEMENT ABOUT, the illusions.

    • Jim S Smith says:


      Electron microscopes don’t necessarily “create” the entities themselves. They create false-images.

      They also effectively KILL the observed sample. Therefore, impossible to observe anything – from a killed sample.

    • Alan Kwan says:

      Their techniques, namely preparation of the specimen for inspection under the microscope, does insert toxins and stress (starvation etc.) into the cells and cause them to produce particles in response to the unnatural toxification and stress.

  8. Paul says:

    *** BREAKING NEWS ***

    “Scientists have discovered a new number today called bleen. It falls between six and seven.”

    ~ George Carlin

    And THAT’S not ridiculous!
    It’s called Science.
    Come on man, get with it.

    I’m just sayin’

  9. Anne says:

    Surely the Hillman disclosures one more nail in the coffin?

    A belgian newspaper reports on Gand University research that links nutrition deficiency with covid:


    Proof, if proof still needed, of what Jon has been saying all along: no SINGLE cause but plenty of environmental, nutritional, living conditions causes… no virus just a very convenient pandemic…

    Wonder whether Jon, or anyone else, has been able to find out what happened to that Italian Doctor who carried out the autopsies (as per the Italian Parliament request in 2019) on the first 100 dead of “covid” and disclosed that 98 of them had in fact died of at least one of their “co-morbidity” and needed to do more work on the last two?

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Nothing surprising here, because over %99.7 of “diseases” are also common with nutritional deficiencies and imbalances!

      The body can even sustain itself under influence of some poisons – if it is operating optimally – because of good nutritional balance.

      Such a shame that the “medical schools” mention very little on the role of “nutrition”. There again, when John D. Rockefeller took over the “medical schools” with his lavish “gifts” – he also determined what they would teach (all of it, pro-“big pharma” drugs as treatments).

      • Sharon says:

        Nutrition or lack of it seems to be the major driver in illness historically. Living in toxic squalor plus extremely poor nutrition in 18-19th centuries saw epidemics of illnesses that all declined with better living conditions plus more importantly, better nutrition (less toxic environment). As you say, a well-nourished body can deal with much of our current day toxicity. The body is a marvellous creation.

  10. Mika says:

    Well done Jon. Building on this article, I’m sure you’ve heard of Royal Rife and perhaps Gaston Naesans. Both created what are known today as “dark field microscopy” where they could actually view LIVE microbes (somatids/bacteria) and how they behaved. This as opposed to today’s histology via electron microscopes which require the microbe sample to be killed, all activity halted and static. This process thus suspends understanding as the viewer can only witness a single “moment in time”.

    The life, career and reputation of both Rife and Naesans were effectively destroyed as well as their dark field microscopes effectively (for the masses) along with their lives. I believe Naesans still has some “somatascopes” and there have been many efforts to rebuild Rife’s microscope, but neither are “approved” tools used by the establishment, rendering them all but non-existent.

    I believe it’s safe to say that if these dark field microscopes became commonplace, the virus story would soon be put out to pasture shortly thereafter.

    • Jim S Smith says:


      Guess I should have read the comments first!

      I gave a good commentary on what I learned of Rife’s work – and his ingenious microscope.

      The man was almost on par with Nikola Tesla in brilliance!

    • Sean says:

      Just reminded me that I have the Rife frequencies and a David Sereda Wand and Copper Vortex Mantra which you can run any frequencies through them, including Rifes, to specifically treat so many ailments, with this very high amped system.

  11. BigTim says:

    How can a virus live in or out of a cell if viruses are not alive anywhere?

    Isn’t it generally agreed that viruses (this is assuming they exist) are not alive, not considered living things?

    So how do you kill a virus, have a “live” or “killed” virus vaccine, shed live virus, do experiments on killing virus on various surfaces if they are not living?

    Sometimes I see terms ‘replicable” and “non-replicable” virus or virus vaccines and don’t know if this is an attempt to be more accurate or skirt the issue.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      “Computer viruses”, from the old days of computing, weren’t alive – but under certain conditions – were able to replicate. NOTICE: I said “under certain conditions”. This is because they used the host computer’s resources to provide the services of replicating.

      There again,

      Successful computer viruses take a lot of time and refinement, in order to do what they are programmed to do. Even then, these computer viruses are very limited in how far they can go – before “bugs” and other defects in coding or logic – may cause them to fail, or become something else – completely unintended by the programmer.

      “Life” and Nature are FAR more complex, because there are far more variations in “terrain” and other conditions that further minimize the chances of a “living virus” to be functional. – Plus – IF such “viruses” did exist – their simplistic protein structures would be extremely fragile and susceptible to oxidation, UV-caused breakdown, and other possible reactive ions in their environment.

      It’s far simpler to create and launch a computer virus than anything evidenced in Nature, so far.


      What keeps these “mad scientists” from CREATING an artificial “virus” – and “programming” it to become a serious problem – as well as be able to survive the many instances of a hostile environment the purported “virus” is expected to be exposed to? ? ?

      – All these questions and hypotheses, but very few solid answers!

      I more chalk all of this up to “chemical warfare”, disguised as “biological warfare” – because ALL of these historic “pandemics/epidemics” for the last several centuries – can be traced to one or more routes of poisoning!

    • R Anand says:

      Apt questions. I too have wondered on the same lines for the last 18 months since I realised the hoax that cvid was.

      From what I have read and understood so far from sources that quote the official microbiology reasoning, it is that the so-called virions are not observed to be moving but when the cell culture in which the virions are assumed to be present is transferred to another and death of the cells is observed then it is assumed to ‘replicability” and “infection”.

      Someone else may want to elaborate. If our fellow commenter called ‘Researcher’ is reading this, I would request him to throw more light.

  12. stephen langley says:

    All we need to know about virology: “virus” : literally means “poison”. A toxin enters the body. The body reacts to slough it off… this is the actual healing process of DIS-ease; the body is working to right itself. The toxin damages / kills / binds to cellular material creating (DEAD) material that no doubt “gum up the works”. Depending on individual toxic load (wrongly labelled “viral load”), both specific and general determines level of “infection”. This is obviously born out by comorbidity as a major factor in severity and death rates.

    But which actually comes first ? Obviously AND EMPIRICALLY – effect is wrongly being identified as cause. Transmissible “dis-ease” VIA VIRUS ALONE is IMPOSSIBLE in a healthy host. The perceptual problem now is the overall toxic load of the planet is so high that more dis-ease, i.e. toxin sloughing, i.e. virus creation, is occurring helping create the illusion of discreet germ based diseases. It’s a scam: EFFECTS ARE BEING (both willfully by a few and mindlessly by most) MISREPRESENTED AS CAUSES.


    • Jim S Smith says:

      This is the WHOLE problem of “today’s medicine” – under the tutelage of the Rockefeller Foundation: “Symptoms are treated as the causes of disease, rather than seen as results of a diseased condition”

      File this under the current “medical paradigm” of: “Disease management” – Because “they” know that sick patients are guaranteed, continuous profits! Healthy people are simply NOT PROFITABLE. – That’s from the mindset of folks like John D. Rockefeller, Sr!

  13. BigTim says:

    As far as isolating viruses go, there are of many, dozens, hundreds of articles out there in the journals considering using various viruses (virions?) as vectors to use in genetic therapies/vaccines infiltrating cells with inserted genetic code.

    One example:


    I guess the J&J vaccine is one current example. The others to me as I presently consider are synthetic virions, let them call them lipid nanoparticles if they like. So how can they grow and use a particular virus, let alone alter/add/subtract genetic info inside it, if they can not isolate it?

  14. Kyle says:

    The medical cartels conveniently avoid the thorny fact that the observer changes the observed. This doesn’t fly in particle physics because they know this to be a fundamental truth. Dr. Cowan explains here how the observer alters the terrain of the observed “virus”.


    • Jim S Smith says:

      The “Observer Effect” is a well-known, tested theory.

      It is also a branch in the direction of “Quantum Physics”.

      Even though Quantum Physics has been researched since the 1940’s (at least), it is STILL ignored and rebuked in today’s “scientific-consensus-driven circles”!

      • Sean says:

        So if the injectees are the test/experiment, then the observers can influence the subjects.

        Injectors and injectees involved are directly in the experiment. But the observers are not until they observe. Then the observer has its “observer Effect” on the experiment and outcome. Interesting.

      • Raven says:

        Yes, because it’s the key that unlocks the door to enlightenment and they don’t want humanity to get anywhere near it. This “ignoring reality” aspect by The Gods of Science is another inversion tactic meant to keep humans in the dark about everything. When people realize they are all connected to each other and everything else in the universe via the quantum field, their mind prison collapses. This situation you brought up is a much bigger issue than most people realize; it really is the key to the door that sets people free.

  15. Jim S Smith says:

    One of the MAIN reasons why “viruses” could not be observed anyway – that is IF they were considered to be far too small for using optical microscopes to view them (like many bacteria CAN be observed through a high-powered optical microscope) – THEN – this leaves our only alternative means of viewing them: The Electron Microscope.

    The problem here is:

    Electron Microscopes, by the mechanics they function on – bombarding the slide sample with electrons – and view the “shadows” where electrons were absorbed by the sample (much in a similar fashion to how X-rays function) – THIS bombarding the (living) sample with electrons essentially KILLS the sample. – Therefore, what you end up seeing is a “snapshot” of a now-dead sample! You “electrocute” the sample, in order to see it through an electron microscope.


    HOW can one observe something that is no longer “living” and indistinguishable from the surrounding material? ? ? – So WHERE do these “scientists” draw the distinction of some “viral DNA/RNA” from the rest of the fragmented proteins of broken down cellular matter? ? ?

    – “Scientific cherry-picking at its finest!

    This is another clue to the false premise that is employed as if it were “science”: ASSUMPTIONS, in place of physical evidence.

    Now, IF Royal Raymond Rife’s magnetic-image microscope was allowed into market, this would have been a huge boon for the micro-biology community – because the Rife Microscope would NOT kill the samples – even at such NANOscopic levels! – THEN, and ONLY then – could they say “they can observe live viruses” (if there are any such) in action!


    The “scientific community” screwed itself over, when it allowed Rife’s Microscope to be trash-canned and forgotten about – all because the manufacturers of the electron microscope wanted the market all to themselves! ! !

    I know,

    “Shoulda, coulda, woulda – are all dead ends”, but that does not dissuade the point that modern science would be far better off – IF these earlier, more-advanced technologies were allowed to be further developed – and become commonplace in every science lab. THEN, we could definitively prove whether or not – that “living viruses do exist”.

  16. Jim S Smith says:

    The only “variant” we have right now, is “AUTHORITARIANISM”!

  17. Roundball Shaman says:


    ‘Eureka! Look, my dear student friend. I’ve discovered something – a VIRUS!’

    ‘A WHAT, sir?’

    ‘A virus!’

    ‘May I look in there, Professor?’

    ‘Sure! Here, you look at this!’

    ‘OK, I’m looking…still looking..’

    ‘Well? Don’t you see it!?’

    ‘Well…um…ahh…Sure, I think I do…’


    ‘Are you sure it’s in there?’

    ‘Yes! I just discovered it! And YOU see it TOO, right?’

    ‘Well ahh… yes sir! It’s there all right.’

    ‘So you are confirming that I just discovered a VIRUS, right?’

    ‘Whatever you say, sir!’

    ‘You DO want to have career in the emerging field of virology don’t you? And you know that I’m a foremost expect in this cutting edge field of The Science!, right? And that I hold your entire future in my brilliant hands, right?’


    ‘I know that! But’s it’s great to hear you say it!’

    ‘What shall we be discovering NEXT, sir?’

    ‘I’ll let you know! I’m talking with Fauci later today…’

  18. seasons says:

    There has to be a virologist, microbiologist, geneticist that can give a better explanation than that. Such statements like viruses cannot be isolated or isolation is unnecessary can only come from those scientists that only know how to do their jobs and don’t fundamentally understand the scientitic reasoning behind it.

  19. Arby says:

    “How do you describe the structure of a thing when you don’t have the thing?”

    There’s an old saying: Bullshit baffles brains.

    You could qualify that and say bullshit baffles brains if those brains never kick into gear.

  20. Kathleen Donnelly says:

    The shock and horror of people believing they can catch the so called ” virus” from a kitchen work top… or handle of a door or even touching someones arm.. contact of any kind.. ‘Fear’ is the virus its quiet contagious – in my opinion.. and the sick people are just that ill with some infection and inflammation.. try and tell that to the gullible public programmed to believe anything the authorities tell them..

  21. Bruce Wallace says:

    Covid Vaccine Is a Conspiracy Against You, Me, All of Us

    Paul Craig Roberts

    Listen to this 18 minute video describing the US patent on the vaccine as a control device that destroys your privacy and denies you autonomy. Listen to the description of the Australian law that destroys the independence of citizens. The documents exist. You can look them up yourselves. We insouciant people have been transported far beyond Orwell’s 1984 and are in the hands of total evil.


  22. Lois says:

    This article changed my understanding. Very effective Jon, thank you. I grasped a new aspect of the virus game and the science I’ve never trusted.

    As I see it, there are many facets to an understanding of any truth and more facets are added as it clarifies. A truth’s idea appears to me in the form of a hedron and this article changed the shape of my hedron of understanding of the false science by adding new facets.

    I could say you blew my mind then a new grasp of the underlying vapid non-morality, the way foundationless concepts can develop and how the confused deluded perpetrators prop one another up and hang on to their nothingnesses to avoid treading on the fearful ground of true reality took shape in my mind.

    Thank you!

  23. Questionit21 says:

    I like how this website explains Isolation process with an Exosome at the end they struggled to Isolate and Exosome.


    So makes me wonder that Viruses are similar size and have similar features to an Exosome how can a Virus be Isolated when an Exosome unable to Isolate. That’s the real reason not a single FOI has an Isolated and Purification of Covid 19 allegedly a Virus from a human being.

    Been reading and watching clips that next Pandemic more being a Plandemic is the Marburg Virus that will be linked to the Covid 19 Booster that will eventually get to know about symptoms similar to hemorrhagic fever. The only wayout is get a new Experimental Gene Therapy inoculation that will contain a very deadly Toxin Ricin how long then will see 100s of Millions died and Billions in Hospitalisations and ICU.


  24. Claudio says:

    I like very much this theory, and I agree with it, but there is the military NBC research, searching for new viruses and trying to understand if they have been disseminated by enemies.

    Now I know that in some special maximum biosecurity laboratories, the military doctors are working on “Gain of Function” for some viruses, to obtain more dangerous ones to be disseminated to foe countries. If viruses don’t exist, on what damned materials are these doctors and professors working? In addition, how could be obtained the US-2006257852-A1 patent for Coronavirus?

    • Rick in Phoenix says:

      Claudio: If viruses don’t exist, on what damned materials are these doctors and professors working?

      Rick: Stew Peters interviewed Dr. Carrie Madej who assayed the J&J vaccine and found what appeared to be a tiny living creature. This is consistent with low temperature preservation until nearing injection time. The graphene oxide is an electrical power grid for the parasite, that looks like a squid only on microscale.

      Graphene oxide is a superconductor that seeks out high electrical activity areas of the body like the heart and brain. It also connects with 5G. Essentially, we’re being injected with a type of cybernetic parasite. It’s actually why ivermectin, a parasite antidote works.

      The power from graphene oxide requires oxygen atoms and that would explain why oxygen is stolen from red blood cells making it look like covid-patients are short of oxygen. The antidote for that is N-acetyl-cysteine and tart-cherry-supplement at the health food store– and that would explain the FDA’s new ban on N-A-C in July 2021.

      Of course, I’m just a piano player not a research biologist so I might be singing the wrong tune here…. but I don’t think so!

  25. gjuhnrieiuhgr says:

    If viruses ain’t contagious how did I get sick?

  26. hyden says:

    ”This test has not been FDA cleared or approved” from page 80 lol

    This is done by AI , they took certain gene clips put in computer and voila a new fake Frankenstein,


  27. Shannon Gream says:

    I discovered a bunch of patents for liquid crystal graphene oxide uses, and they love to use pcr and isolate the toxins they inject into us!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *