For the past year, I’ve been demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a fake. No one has proved it exists. Now let’s enter the bubble where people assume the virus is real, and examine a few of the major crimes and contradictions that exist inside that lunatic bubble.
by Jon Rappoport
May 26, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
I wrote and posted this piece eight months ago , while the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were doomed to fail. They did fail. Since then, nothing has changed.
The vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials  that, even on their own terms (“the virus is real, fear the virus”) were destined to be a complete flop.
Here is the piece I wrote in September 2020—followed by a new explosive epilogue which brings us up to date on the scandal.
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”: 
“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”
“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
They are only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive.
Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.
“The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”
Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups— those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.
Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.
The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.”
The outcomes for 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.” That’s staggering.
But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:
“In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”
But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article  stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive. It registers “positive for COVID” when it shouldn’t.
So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that “150 people developed COVID-19” is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical. On the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On the other hand, a cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is designed to prevent.
“So the magic number is 150? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”
“And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.”
“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”
“Yes, that’s right.”
“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”
“I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”
“Thank you, sir. And that’s tonight’s news. Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone. It’s vital. This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South. The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects. Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.”
PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK
Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…
The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…
Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.
Stick with me. This is big.
Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.
Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers.
Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.
Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.
Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?
Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.”
BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.
Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”
HERE WE GO.
The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. Half as many as in the placebo group. The vaccine IS 50% effective. We’re good. We’re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.”
Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.
Why leave things to chance?
Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?
The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.
They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”
However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur. That might never happen.
If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…
They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.
FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”
The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine.
These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.
And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.
I’m writing this part on May 16, 2021, eight months after the piece you’ve just read.
At this point in time, the CDC obviously wants to show “the vaccine is working very well.” And by “show,” I mean the CDC, carrying on its fine tradition of lying, will rig new guidelines.
And this is exactly what they’ve done. They’ve found an easy statistical way to make it seem as if very few people are “coming down with COVID-19” after getting vaccinated. (They call these few people “breakthrough cases.”)
How do they achieve this con? Answer: By changing the way vaccinated people who then fall ill are tested.
And THAT means they need these people to test negative on the PCR test. “Yes, Mr. Jones is ill, and he was vaccinated three weeks ago, but you see he isn’t now ill with COVID. We know that, because we did a PCR test on him and it came up negative.”
How is this negative test outcome engineered? By changing the sensitivity of the test. By making it less sensitive.
This involves REDUCING the number of “cycles” in the test. (Each cycle is a quantum leap of increased sensitivity.)
In many prior articles—even using direct quotes from Tony Fauci—I’ve demonstrated that running the PCR test at 35 cycles or higher results in a meaningless outcome. Meaningless, but strewn with false-positives. In other words, HUGE numbers of people are told they’re infected—and are “COVID cases.” 
FDA/CDC guidelines from the beginning of the “pandemic” recommended running the PCR test at up to 40 cycles.  [6a] [6b]
Obviously, this was a rigged method for falsely jacking up the COVID case numbers. And it worked. Sensationally.
Which was the plan. Every false pandemic needs this strategy.
But NOW, after the vaccination has been introduced, the planners want to show that people who take the vaccine aren’t “coming down with COVID.”
So now the CDC declares that the PCR test should be run using FEWER cycles, when testing those vaccinated people who then “get sick with COVID symptoms.”
This will automatically reduce the number of these “breakthrough cases” of COVID.
And here it is. The CDC reference document is, “COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation; Information for public health, clinical, and reference laboratories.” 
The money quote is direct and unmistakable:
“Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value [less than or equal to] 28.”
Translation: When you have vaccinated people who then get sick with COVID symptoms, run the PCR test on them at less than or equal to 28 cycles.
Not 40 cycles, as in the “old days.” 28 cycles.
Fewer “breakthrough cases.” Fewer vaccinated people appear to then come down with COVID. The vaccine looks like a roaring success.
Even so, the CDC is facing a major problem. The PCR test, no matter how it’s run, is intrinsically so unreliable, so prone to errors, so liable to spit out false-positives, these “breakthrough cases” are popping up. And famous people—like eight New York Yankees—are among them . So the press is covering the issue.
But the CDC is valiant. Their liars are veterans. They’re weathering the storm. They’d say, with a straight face, that a tomato is the moon if they had to.
And they do have to. Their only alternative is embarrassment, prison, and a people’s revolution.
[6a] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 06, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 12/01/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20210102171026/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[6b] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 07/13/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20200715004004/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
“They are only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID…”
I remember reading this months ago, and it seemed like in-your-face proof that this was a fraud.
That doesn’t stop people flocking to get an experimental injection and a chance to win a million or a beer. It’s hopeless where I live, and I’m way past the point of caring about the imbeciles anymore.
Another data point that the mainstream media effectively removed from the conversation: the vaccines were not designed or tested for reducing severe cases, only the mild ones nobody gives a shit about
Absolutely.And face diapers? Just indicators of the wearers’submission to the CCP led destruction of society.
nfw, I am not a proponent of the so called Vax. I was hospitalized in ICU for just under 2 weeks this summer with COVID and then needed 2+ months of rehab from the severe side effects. I still suffer some long term effects. Given what I went through, I am still NOT a proponent of the kill shot and won’t be taking it. However, while the government is a congenital liar and has lied about “to wear or not to wear” a mask, due to the long term complications I have, when I am out in public I wear a mask – The Reason, one of my side effects is that when I cough or sneeze I involutarialy expell mucous and it goes everywhere. So I wear a mask in public to protect others from my bodily discharges. Not all of us who wear masks are in “submission to the CCP led destruction of society.”
Those who take the jab for a chance to win a million or a beer must be inexplicably dumb, because they could otherwise win 1.5 million euro with certainty (Eckert’s bounty) even without taking the jab.
It’s similarly hopeless here too (Malaysia). Stupidest country in the world with ignorant citizens who refuse to read and learn anything. That’s what it is.
Certainly the moon is a tomato.
There are many tomatoes but only one moon.
As for the vaccine trials of course they rigged it
beautifully. They could’t fail. But how could something
be approved by the FDA for emergency use, when the only
requirement of the vaccine was to lessen or prevent mild
symptoms. Since when do mild symptoms in the population
constitute an ’emergency’. This is such obvious fraud.
If the emergency were real then the vaccines would be
useless by their own standards.
How many severe reactions to the vaccines were there,
in the trials?
Were the vaccines used in the trials even the same
formulation as those used on the public later?
Again the vaccine trials were nonsense even if a real
pathogen existed. How can you know how many of each
group got exposed and how long are you supposed to wait
before you test.
Clearly another agenda being carried out as we all know
who are not hypnotized by the main stream ‘news’.
Agree with your comment. Also, the “if” in the 6th paragraph is important and in my opinion, in the opinion of Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr Tom Cowan also,the existence of no ” virus” at all is being shown. More obvious is all the othef poisons in the “substance.”
The CDC etc. are liars and decievers. They are so dishonest they almost always contradict their own “studies” about anything everytime they open their mouths to tell you about their “science”. That’s why they use PCR tests, right? To make up for any results they want as a reason to control/force people into totalitarian dystopia and conveniently “bypassing” the law by doing so.
How else can they apply vaccine passports and other communistic style policies without losing public trust? They use ‘scientism’ as always when they want to fool people into believing their deliberate lies. And most people always believe what these “medical” institutions say, no matter how stupid their lies are because they trust them. They look up to them and see them as “medical experts”. And THAT to the people who can think is just laughable!
Wouldn’t it be nice if these groups could even make their lies consistent with each other.
From above: “In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test …”
Meanwhile CDC contradicts that saying mere cough alone is a covid case by definition with no positive test requirement specified, only perhaps “being within 6 feet for at least 15 minutes” with a “probable case”. Elsewhere they talk about cell phone tracking. Then there’s … if a family member or anyone in a group near one (cohort) can be said to have it.
But the whole thing is written to be confusing deliberately as no writer could be as dumb as this page unintentionally …
No symptoms at all will also suffice … “evaluations of persons with no symptoms and these individuals will need to be counted as cases”.
Why don’t they add to the list … if you feel unhappy (about the lies), then you have covid.
We’re swimming in deceptions everywhere.
> And THAT to the people who can think is just laughable!
As laughable as most modern people would think of Old Testament idolatry (Baal and such) – and it is exactly the same thing, idolatry, in modern-day’s clothing.
Ah,yes, assuredly…and old Brownie in Oregon is doin’ all she can to keep the momentum up with new “policies” “mandates” and other non-law jargon to inject (literally?) more fear and ignorance into folks.
& Liars figure.”
“What’s past is prologue.”
~ WS (Antonio contemplating an epilogue of murder?)
May WE navigate through the storm.
The vaccines are only supposed to prevent mild cases of covid. Children don’t get severe cases of covid and don’t die from it. A twelve year od has a greater chance of getting struck in the head by a meteorite than dying of covid. Yet kids are the latest targets of the venomous jabs.
Yes, agree. So we can easily deduce from this that their true cause is money, control and injecting a carousel of poisons/genetic alterating substances for their “piece de resistance”: culling eugenics
Fauci financed Gain of Function research at the Wohan Institute of Virology, and they did in fact create the virus. So it exists.
Please check out this long video by Dr Richard Fleming. He explains it much better than I can.
We can prove the funding, and we have the guys talking on video. BUT just like my friend Jon said already, this is not proof that the virus exist.
You are making a huge jump in your assessment.
Gain of function is about engineering an articial PEGylated lipid to mimick exosomes so that it can evade the body’s detoxification system when it is injected.
Fleming is speaking no science. There is no questioning of virus isolation and existence, or the veracity of the PCR test, or the genome sequencing of the virus, or the proof for asymptomatic transmission. Every one of the above is easily proven to be scientific fraud if one actually reads the source papers which back those claims.
He has no answers for any of the questions raised by Rappoport and co. He just speaks starting with a mountain of assumptions, unproven ones that are easily missed by the gullible.
Thanks for the link. But we need to see that any such “virus” was scientifically isolated, which as far as i have heard from those doctors closely reading all the studies of “it”, they never did. And, it does make one wonder: if this was “gain of function” experimentation going on they really missed the mark by only reaching a mild to moderate flu level after all is said and done, all their monkey-business.
I think it’s more likely that the Wuhan Lab is a Star Trek Writer’s Guild where they develop story lines like this one from New Generation…
Too much tinkering in the lab can lead to the accidental genesis of a new disease, as Dr. Beverly Crusher finds out in The Next Generation. Desperately trying to activate the gene that is supposed to cure an alien flu in a crewmate, she realizes too late that the artificial T-cells she uses reanimate every last one of his dormant genes. That includes introns — crucial to gene expression. While symptoms start off like the flu (don’t they always), DNA will then “de-evolve” into nonhuman codes. Unfortunately, this glob of degenerative genes soon crawls out of its petri dish. When it becomes airborne, the crew turns into everything from a jellyfish to an iguana to an enormous acid-spewing cockroach, which just has to be Worf.
“Breakthrough cases”, what a laugh! Just about everywhere these jabs have been introduced, death rates have shot up following their mass administration. Then declined, because the vulnerable couldn’t die more than once. Unless perhaps statistically as pre-vaccine COVID deaths.
The only places where death rates did not increase in the wake of these jabs have been where glyphosate is not in use. Hmmm….
Apparently, the famous Spanish Flu of 1909 I think– involved deaths from jabs- not a flu, according to some reports I’ve been looking at. Thank God for the internet.
Please correct the placebo statement about it being a saline solution! They were never tested against a safe saline solution because that would force the studies to fail. They picked some of the worst vaccines out there, like the Meningitis vaccine as the Placebo.
None Yun, do you have a source for that claim. A placebo is an inert substance, generally in the form of a sugar pill, or injects like a saline solution. No other vaccine, even bad ones, can be used as placebos. A placebo has no therapeutic value.
For the Pfizer trial, it seems that they did use saline. (Might be different with other makers.)
However, they use a simple trick: people who show “COVID symptoms”, if they test negative on the PCR, are counted neither as COVID cases (endpoint) nor adverse event.
There was no statistically significant difference of “suspected COVID cases” (COVID symptoms) between the test group and the placebo group, and no details were provided about the severity of those symptoms for individual patients. So it is well possible that a few hundred cases of serious adverse events (which is a big number for AE but would not make much of a dent in the numbers for suspected cases) could be buried and discounted under that label.
To truly verify effectiveness: If the trial “volunteers” (vaxed and placebo) weren’t directly subjected to inhale pure isolated strains of the supposed Sars Cov2 virus, post injection, then the trial results are meaningless.
Remedies either work or they don’t. Its either 100% effective or not effective, and back to the drawing board These researchers would fit better in the job role as backyard children’s birthday magicians.
Gradually the Supertanker will turn around as the truth outs with persistent refusal to take the Kool Aid…all will be well and we will look back in awe at the constancy of the human spirit…another constructed plague in history gone down…
I have written to world doctors alliance ref. Non existtance of COVID-19 virus.
To Andrew Kaufman and Delores Cahill and why no banging of the drum!
Worrying. It’s a game changer and collapse of the political card pack.
Is money worth the death of business and lives?
Everyone here already knows this. But worth repeating.
What are the ‘antibodies’ that ‘they’ allege they are testing for?
Thank you for all your recent articles, they are incredible.
To Jon et al.,
This story goes way beyond being a “scam.” As soon as I can I ‘ll take a look at the video mentioned by William Clark about senior faucci specifically funding “Gain of Function” research at the above-mentioned chinese (Wuhan) institute. However, reportedly the earliest instances of ‘Gain of Function’ (GOF) research on these (corona) viruses actually took place at UNC – Chapel Hill! Folks, you need to look honestly and unflinchingly at the full story, even when it might reflect poorly on people of your own country. Not being a ‘member of the Bar” my experience does however include intensive studies of law – specifically Business Law. It appears we now have the third, and most difficult to prove component of fraud. Keep in mind – I am Not offerring any “Legal” opinion, nor any legal advice – none whatsoever. My statement says “It appears … (to be) fraud.” Additionally, getting a legal case such as this before any US Judge will probably be a monumental challenge. Also, I recall Jon’s article from last September. It was after reading and contemplating that ‘blog’ that I began telling family member – Unequivocally, Stay away from these injections! I told others as well and have reccomended this ‘blog to several people. Soon after, I also began telling any and all sorts of people: “Hidden Faces for Hidden Agendas.” We can hold on to hope – Keep the Faith. – Dr. W.
Dr.W Additionally, getting a legal case such as this before any US Judge will probably be a monumental challenge
Rick: US judges and the so-called Judicial Branch of Government has rotted. We’re going to have to move beyond “the judicial system” into the area of Natural Law… THAT is where we’ll be able to see ‘real action’. We may be able to turn Natural Law scopes on the US “judges” to see those wasted minds in prison themselves. There are always higher authorities…. that is… if you believe in God. I do. And God works in very interesting and mysterious ways… that I’m documenting. Call me a madman if you will but I do believe I’m “hearing” God joke around with me here and there. He-it-she-whatever… the God entity is there.
Not remembering the past fake pandemics could literally be deadly.
Rewind to 1976 and the swine flu hoax. 60 minutes Mike Wallace does an exceptionally good job carving up the CDC Head Cheese.
Please don’t call the Wuhan Sniffles injection a “vaccine”. It is at best an untested and unregulated genetic manipulator drug.
False Flags of different
types, & stripes.
Jon called this from the Get-Go how the PCR cycles were ramped up so high to generate COVID CASE SURGE of False Positives and then would be reduced to prove the Inoculate worked. The CDC hides everything in plain sight. The PCR test never had the “C19 isolate” in the first place, so positive or negative doesn’t mean a thing about SARS/COVID19 or any deaths attributed to it.
People are divided forever by this planned Scamdemic- I was able to convince my two brothers (we’re all in our early 70s and decent health) to NOT GET THE JAB – Hallelujah! Downside, my son’s in-laws took it and are not doing well.
THEIR number one objective is to protect the Germ Theory paradigm.
I am absolutely in favor of their embarrassment, prison and a peoples revolution.
I know too many people who really believe the whole covid narrative. Never looking at data, just whatever the tv sayeth. These liars are very good at lying and people are way to gullible.
But they are not fooling everyone.
I look forward to the moment of an overwhelming peoples revolution in favor of ethics and accountability in this top down criminal orchestration that is so bent on imposing fraud on everyone they can, for gargantuan amounts of money and lets face it, sickness and death.
I’m in! What more could I do to help this along? Hum.
Psychopaths cannot feel embarrassment.
To those among you who truly care about humans, I implore you to carefully summarize and, via email, phone and direct conversations spread the messages Jon has made in these blogs. (I suggest you do not bother with Facebook, etc. for this purpose.)
Also, having watched the Richard Fleming interview I strongly reccommend that others who have the background needed to understand the terms as well as those who are willing to spend time looking up words and those things which they do not understand well – do watch that interview. It is linked above in the comment from Richard Clark. Although it is packed with many bits of useful information, many questions yet remain. Fleming shows many things, including a purported microscopic view of this SARS-CoV2 virus. On that note, I remain on Jon’s side of this question and here’s why: just like Jon has written, as soon as some lab does isolate and prove this virus exists, they are likely to make a world wide announcement. They wiil seek the acclaim and further funding that such a discovery would likely bring to them. The microscope images shown in Fleming’s presentation could easily be taken from SARS (1), or MERS or any number of other corona viruses. Dr. Fleming is very alluring and speaks of a kind of personal integrity which I would very much like to trust. He is however both an MD and a JD, ie. a lawyer. I am Not a medical doctor
Fleming is, of course, controlled opposition. Each and every microscopic image of any purported “virus” has got no documented proof of the characterization of the indicated particles, so they prove nothing. The Wuhan lab bio-weapon theory and “gain of function” blah blah blah is sexy fear porn contributing to the main narrative (scam).
Thank you Jon
I will be contacting my local state reps and displaying this info everywhere I can.
Bums, is all I can say.
AK in VT
Jon’s articles are the best antidote to the fear porn.
To help their case along for an “effective” vaccine, CDC is now telling vaccinated people to stop getting tested.
AND the CDC has stopped counting breakthrough cases.
I think the economy is collapsing and Operation Covid is the best cover for these criminals. Like back in the 1930s and 1940s, they are culling the global herd- that might be their plan. But best laid plans can go awry. We are many-they are few. They fight for money; we fight for our lives, so dont put any bets on this fight! I am not sure how many Americans can think right now with this MSM fear mongering, but the world awaits Americans to lead the charge.