Yes, the NY Times exposed the PCR test

by Jon Rappoport

February 18, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

As I’ve been telling readers for many months, even if you assume SARS-CoV-2 is real, the test is useful, and the case and death numbers are meaningful, there are vast and crippling internal contradictions within the official portrait of COVID-19.

Currently, I’m focusing on the PCR test and its fatal flaws.

The test is a MAJOR weak point in the enemy’s attack on humanity. If the test falls, the case and death numbers are shown to be wildly false, and the whole pandemic narrative collapses.

I urge readers to spread this information far and wide.

On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a long article headlined, “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [1] [2]

Its main message? “The standard [COVID PCR] tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus…Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”

“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

“On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.”

TAKEAWAY FROM THE Times: Up to 90% of ALL people who have been labeled “COVID cases” are not COVID cases. This fact would downgrade the pandemic to “just another flu season.” And there would be no reason for lockdowns.

Of course, the Times goes on to say the solution to this problem is MORE TESTING. Only a moron would accept that notion.

The enduring message of their article still stands: the PCR test apparatus is a fraud, through and through. It enables the recording of monumentally false case numbers, which are used to declare unnecessary lockdowns and wall-to-wall economic destruction.

Make the truth known.


SOURCES:

[1] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210217055535/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

68 comments on “Yes, the NY Times exposed the PCR test

  1. JV says:

    Evidently they have had the quantitative data all along and now FDA has approved it since December.

    https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/viral-load-predictor-covid-19-patient-outcomes

    It’s time to see the data!

  2. Paul says:

    “Of course,
    the Times goes on to say
    the solution to this problem
    is MORE TESTING.
    Only a moron
    would accept that notion.”

    Now that’s gold!

    And that’s, the Truth.

    And its gleam, shines & spreads.

  3. Long Laurence says:

    Kary Mullis died in August of 2019 and as the inventor of the PCR test has not been around to comment on the validity of it’s use for diagnosis for Covid? What kinds of tests were used historically to check for the presence of viruses? Is PCR used for influenza diagnosis? If not why not? How come we hear very little, if at all, about other tests? Why did the PCR become so prevalent when it was only designed to make study more efficacious, not to determine how grave was the situation in each observation? It is surprising none of these things seem to be discussed.

    • Joz Lee says:

      According to PCR INVENTOR, Karry Mullis himself, PCR cannot be totally and should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”

      • Benjamin Martin says:

        Yes…saved that NYT article from when it was published. Easy as punch to connect the dots from there: people come in genuinely ill with flu, or pneumonia, or upper respiratory infections, all of which supposedly manifest the same symptoms of the phantom COVID virus. Then you get the over-amplified PCR test – it’s not complicated.

    • Bradley P Hayward says:

      Check out Under the Wire interviews David Rasnick regarding HIV and Covid 19. It seems PCR replaced traditional isolation and electron microscopy in the 1990’s.

      • Because electron microscopy is a sophisticated picture/model built from the gathered data; temperature and echo, light reflection, electromagnetics, the charge of a thing, its like a sounding for depth, a contour is built and the machine extrapolates accordingly to the known. A computer modelling program takes over and informed programmers render the details.

        A virus should look like “this” because previous metadata shows other viruses looking like “this”, an electron microscope is quite like a complicated hammer, it sees everything as a nail.

        But what is actually there?

        • Sunface Jack says:

          Yes well said. May I add electron microscopes look at dead material only.

          They cannot look at anything alive) That dead material are also basically artefacts.

          ‘Electron microscopists have ignored the dictates of solid geometry and most of the apparent structures they have detected are artefacts of their preparation procedures (Hillman and Sartory, 1980). They select their illustrations, rather than show typical ones. They prefer the results from metal deposits over those from unfixed living cells”. – Harold Hillman

    • Arby says:

      I am sure that I would not agree with Kary Mullis on much. Since this pandemic hoax, I’ve been forced to pay close attention to Rockefeller health ‘care’. And I’ve come to learn a few things.

      Even so, Kary seemed to be a not bad fellow. I have to collect together the video of Kary calling Fauci a fraud, basically, and Tony Fauci insisting that the world needs to double mask and lockdown. That’s because I think that that story is impactful. The guy locking down the world, and using the PCR test to make his case for it, is being called a fraud by the guy who created the case.

    • John says:

      Because as Mr Rapoport has previously reported the cycle rates can be fudged to conveniently raise or lower the number of cases as is politically expedient.

  4. Steve says:

    If PCR test and protocols and procedure for running the test, (number of cycles) is not producing accurate data, why isn’t the scientific communities and governmental authorities looking into this?

    (M)asking for a friend…😷

    • Arthur Danu says:

      Your friend could, and should, ask the same question about the destruction of the 3 WORLD TRADE CENTER buildings.

      If it is physically IMPOSSIBLE for “burning jet fuel” to completely destroy two 110 story steel framed buildings, and a third office building not hit by anything but an ordinary “office fire”, then HOW COME the “scientific community” and “governmental authorities” aren’t looking into this?

      The answer is the same for both questions. People are just AFRAID of the answer.

      Face the truth,and a whole new REALITY will open up for you! It’s worth it! Go for it! Face the FEAR!

    • It’s not about accurate data Steve, it never was…there is an old computer adage, aphorism really. “Garbage in, garbage out. (GIGO)”. That truth is what has been going on for near fifty years.

      The computer really is not the problem, it’s nuts and bolts, it’s the programmers and the data entry people, who load the fucking thing with more bullshit than that shovel can hold.

      This misnomer of “Google it” needs to be addressed…really! It seems trivial but it is not, it’s a huge black monolith, a frozen life-sucking symbol of mind control being built at the center of the human mind via the population’s addiction to the Internet, a message constantly beaconing to their minds and consistently attended to by millions of androids and now, algorithms (which are coded and programmed by humans with needs and wants and desires) and AI are taking the care of nursing this monster into existence. Summoning of the demon. And the saying goes if you don’t know a thing “Google it”

      WHAT?

      Let’s get it straight, Google is a marketing and advertising company…that’s it! They don’t know the truth from Shinola.

      “The Google I was passionate about was a technology company that empowered its employees to innovate. The Google I left was an advertising company with a single corporate- mandated focus. (Whitaker 2012; italics added)”

      The average piece of Internet information has a lifespan of 100 days on the internet, and that piece of truth is a couple years old, it could and probably is much less than that now. But that doesn’t imply that the information loss is truth leaving us like vapor…no, information is a constantly fluid thing being rewritten constantly. To acknowledge that there is any truth on the internet is beyond a doubt more likely. I’m serious about that fact.

      “The world isn’t run by weapons anymore, or energy or money. It’s run by ones and zeroes, little bits of data. It’s all just electrons. . . There’s a war out there, old friend, a world war. And it’s not about who’s got the most bullets. It’s about who controls the information: . . . what we see and hear, how we work, what we think. It’s all about the information.” (Sneakers Script 2017)”

      So, your question is, “[…] why isn’t the scientific communities and governmental authorities looking into this?”

      Because they are the ones that are shedding the Internet every 100 days of its skin and growing a new one. The Internet is a government, a paradigm belief bordering on religion, without sounding like a Luddite it’s all-pure bullshit. It is technocracy being built in front of your eyes and pretty soon, you won’t be asking for the truth.

      Every single thing is compartmentalized, tagged and catalogued. even you and me. Revision, revision and shortened attention span and voila’, 100 days later its a different thing. But it will never be true unless that serves a greater purpose for the technocrats.

      For instance, the machine prompted me to write this thing a specific way, it corrects the spelling and is so profound it speaks to how I sound, and the emotional capacity of the written thing and, “wouldn’t this be a better way of saying it’, or “wouldn’t that…” the algorithms are everywhere.
      Algorithms locked inside writing programs, continue their work after you leave the written piece, they tweak constantly.

      There is an agenda, and so the 40 cycles of PCR ‘is’ the rule of the day, until further notice and ‘Achtung baby’ you better notice.

      “(M)asking for a friend…😷”

      I like this, it hits home, I also am (M)asking for a friend. I will not fight about it, it is too small a battle to place my effort into…I prefer to go for their throats every time they chastise me.

      She (the one I mask for), is in enough crap trying to figure it all out. She has great responsibility and has to play both sides in this political board game, and, she is up to her neck in it…I couldn’t care less about the status quo or the personal health of the larger mob. Or even this meat suit that clothes me, from my point of view that is up to the individual to take care of, your health is your own responsibility, don’t put it on others, that is not your right. And don’t put it on me…but, love it seems… I do bear the lie for my love.
      One has to pick their battles.

      So, this… ‘we are all in this together’ has never flown with me at all. It never will.
      That being said…

      I have been very curious though, about how many multiples of others are ‘(M)asking for a friend’.
      That would be interesting to expose publicly, just might get others to come out of the closet, and admit to…”(Masking) for a friend.”
      I am not sure what purpose it would serve…

      • Walking Dead says:

        So true, Mr. Burns. My corrupt lawyer even bragged how he paid to be on googles top best lawyer search. My ex doctor was rated a 2 on rate your MD,(back when it was an honest site), but now he is one of the top ten doctors on google. Money buys whatever it wants. Like my present doctor says, the truth will never come out, way too much money involved. We have been bull shitted since the beginning of life. What we have now is modern day snake oil salesmen selling what ever they can get the suckers to buy. Fuck you up for rest of your life, and the snake oil salesman has a constant repeat customer. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

      • oranje says:

        “Duckduckgo it” wouldn’t have the same ring.
        Michael; of course you’re right regarding the
        mass of the people, addicted to their smart
        phones and the TV news.

        But the internet can and is being used against
        the corporate controllers, not least on sites
        like this.

        The Nazis for instance had only the press and radio to brainwash the masses and
        the ordinary people had no effective answer.

        But,of course, the education of the
        children and young students is controlled by
        the psychopathic elite.
        Perhaps that’s the most important
        threat to a sane future.
        There are still many of us left that
        remember the, sometimes misguided, rebellion
        and strive for freedom in the ‘Sixties’.

    • Arby says:

      Answer: It’s a ‘gangster’ Corporatocracy. Not just the politicians are gangsters, but pretty much the entire world is sucked into gangsterism by virtue of their being only that world. And everyone needs a job. We should have never allowed such a world to develop, but we did. A single, unprincipled, twisted leader can utter a sentence (after having it whispered into his or her ear by those with money and power) and consign an entire people to hell. That’s democratic?!!!

      We have allowed this kind of dangerous world to develop and we have acceded to shysters’ ideas about economics so that we have come to have this money system, totally games by shysters, in which money means, most improperly, life. Especially once they bring in social credit and UBI, fully, will our very lives depend on the evil benefactors in power. Get an anal swab up the butt or die? They are twisted and they are having a ball. For now.

    • Mac says:

      Several core coms, burns, danu, walking, and don’t mean to overdo, just noting agendas as to supposed rankings, lawyers, docturs etc. Supposed govt and courts only made up last thousand or two years, life was not always this way. Lawyers and govt protect their cons, and medias push both. Lawyers never tell you about summary judgment or how cut to the chase, they drag you halfway to ‘trial’ then drop a case, and rankings on supposed docturs are to push vaxs and pharma chemical system. How do people not catch on as the lawyer you paid chitchats with other lawyer who’s out to destroy you. Or tells you settle when you shouldn’t, or pushes litigation when you should settle. The situations aren’t coincidence.

      Supposed courts and lawyers have been a weapon system, many lawyers function to tank the good person in a case, and reward the crap people among us. Look at faces on avvo, similarity to criminals. The ten percent of lawyers somewhat real are busy, and get tanked by con lawyers and bogus courts. Point is those who say ‘I won’t get involved in court stuff’ or ‘won’t take the vaxs’, when people let conjob systems go on can’t escape being subjected to them, state lawyers and reams of bogus laws they scribbled claiming authority to force masks and vaxs and other agendas.

      – That’s not to say we shouldn’t make effort, just saying things got this way because people don’t see situations as what they are. Didn’t write this for my health btw, but so if reasonates others can make notes to think on, or share in talking. Not on web, off web in real life. Making a few notes from other comments myself. Apologize lack of edit, need some soup, and crackers.

  5. The following applies as much to the USA and elsewhere as to Australia.

    How can anyone trust scientist and those in the medical profession, even so there are many good ones, when they so to say seem to be selling their soul to the devil. In this case power hungry politicians at the cost of the lives of innocent Australians?

    This document can be downloaded from:
    https://www.scribd.com/document/495046125/20210219-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-PM-Mr-SCOTT-MORRISON-Ors-Re-Vaccination-Issues-Suppl-1

    We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!

    • Arthur Danu says:

      But before that, people need to embrace the character and mindset of COURAGE. For it is obviously FEAR that is allowing this con, and other ones, to run rampant all over the globe.

    • They do it because they are technocrats. They are building a technocracy; slavery that no one will be able to free themselves from, the Great Reset is to get to the endpoint, where, returning to what was will be impossible.

      These people are generally atheists who believe in the scientific method, a belief that originated in the 17th century and has polluted all original thought…a stringent method of deducting a truth. A truth that is based and aligns with the basic premise…”Gives us one free miracle (the big bang) and we will explain the rest.”

      • hhi says:

        These people are generally atheists who believe in the scientific method, a belief that originated in the 17th century and has polluted all original thought

        Can you elaborate on that ?
        Cheers

      • oranje says:

        Nothing wrong with scientific method in its place.

        You are spot on about the ‘big bang’ which is
        essentially meaningless. Then we have the substitute religion of evolution as an answer to our very existence.

        The high priest of evolution, David Attenborough is still actively preaching that
        nonsense.

      • Tim says:

        I don’t believe they actually believe in the scientific method, other than the scientific method of deceit and the means of imposing weakness and inferiority upon the general population. Thereby elevating themselves to a god-like position over everyone else this world.

        Poisoning the bodies and minds of humans to degrade them to fulfill and validate their claim of “superiority”.
        They are basically instruments of anti-Christ. The ego being an artificial entity(identity), alien, hostile to The Truth.

        Like cancer. Seeking immortality. Fixing the system for that. The Real never dies, but by clinging to untruth, ego-identity,… there is only one ego–splintered, this thing doesn’t grow, it divides and subdivides within itself– egoMatrix.

        The idea is to shrink it, let go of it(untruth) and not be recycled back. Deceit is what imprisons.
        The Truth Sets Us Free.
        This world is not “reality” in the True sense, it’s only as “real” as we make it or let it be, the ego is like a machine or computer that has taken on a “life” of it’s own, but this is impossible in Truth, it can only seem to happen in a dream of based upon principles contrary to Truth(and Reality).

        It is imperative for them to either install the belief of ego(2-faced hypocrite) as “god” or no god at all and everything is just “random” or “nature”(predatory, parasitic “here”).
        Nothing is random, everything is either coordinated from below the surface by ego(anti-Christ) or The Truth(GOD), depending on individuals openess to either, there’s no in between. There is toggling back and forth, “morphing” into an agent of the Matrix when they see or hear something that threatens it.
        We are All The Son(The Son is infinitely more than just Us), the ego wants to kill The Son, but The Son cannot be killed, so it attempts to deceive and imprison and torture this tiny part of The Son. This tiny part of The Son fell into a dream of separation, fear, guilt and false-judgements, none of which has any effect on Reality except a very brief interuption of communication with THE ONE. The Answer(solution) was given instantly, that is The Truth. It’s all over already actually. In Eternity. But not in time,, yet.

  6. Sue says:

    According to ex-FEMA employee, Celeste Solum, the “tests” are also tagging (barcoding) the recipients of them.

    • JennyM says:

      Sure, why else would the kept NYT reveal the truth (PCR is useless) and reveal another lie (we need more useless testing). They are banking on the known psych factor that when Authority says a lie, then tells the layperson that they (the Authority) was wrong, generally most will cling harder to the original first lie and not even believe the truth, even from the Authority themselves. So they can get away with all sorts of subterfuge. Tagging people and getting their DNA is a perfect cover. Just look at what DARPA is up to these days.

    • River says:

      Hi Sue,

      From what I’ve heard, and I’m not saying this is TRUE, but does anyone know if the vaccines themselves are carrying tags, or tracers, as I’ve heard them called?

  7. Spencer says:

    They published this in 2007. Guessing you’ve seen it, but just in case

    Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t

    https://web.archive.org/web/20151024094617/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

  8. glenn says:

    I disagree with more testing being idiotic. More testing is the solution. The problem is what is being called “testing” is not accurate. What is being done is trying to get quick results. Real testing would factor in actual symptoms, rule out other possible causes of ilnesses first, find actual proof of infection or viral replication. Real testing would try isolating the virus first and test if it causes disease. If a virus cannot be isolated then it would test the entire infected sample and see if other sick people have similar particles.

    What I’m saying is that there has not been any actual testing done during this so called crisis. Everything from the misused PCR, antibody test, chest x-rays, temperature guns, and even pointing out people getting sick is just desperate attempts to get intended results without any legitimate evaluations.

    • We don’t need no stinking testing, everyone an expert now!

    • Blackeyes says:

      Do not forget, COVID-19, remember?, is not a pandemic, there is no pandemic. And the virus has not been “contained”. It is no where registered as such.
      So, to discuss socalled “testing” is futile. It is meaningless.

      The mainpoint about all of this hoax is: to control the people of this planet. That is it!
      It looks like the people are fed up with all the political-symptons like tests, lockdowns, distancing, no social visits, etc. Everytime we think after the lockdown “now it is over”, no sir, my fellow earthling and me are getting a prolongation of the lockdown.

      It is about control, fear.
      Thanks heaven, more and more sheep are waking up. Bill Kill and his comrades are losing again the plot.
      So? More and more Bill Kill and comrades are heating up “Climate Change”, it is standing by as soon as their Covid Big Money Project collapses.

    • Arby says:

      Jon has covered it often. What are you going to test for? A non existent virus? Please.

  9. From Elsewhere says:

    It would be useful to collect all these gems of truth in one place, to build on top of each other, until it stands out so obviously, that sheep, blind, deaf, all will be forced to admit it as it is: The Truth.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      You volunteering to do this?

      I think it would be a most-worthy project! 😉

      I was already in that process for a while. However, a hard-drive crash fixed all that, and some of the original material I had is nowhere to be found on-line any more. (Plus, don’t remember the actual links nor originating sites – to be able to lookup on archive.org.)

    • Arby says:

      That’s easy to do. Bookmark every article and video that you find useful. As a blogger, I have to do that. Externally, You won’t find that, except in limited fashion. Each good site (and that’s ‘good’ that varies) will have a link or two or maybe half a dozen, to other good sites. Therefore, you have to do it for yourself. I’ve actually been meaning to do something like that for readers of my blog. I am busy researching (all open source; I’m not techie at all) and I also find that the scene is changing all the time. Mind you, a list that it’s my possession can also be one that I keep updated. I just have to remember to do it – and find the time. Unfortunately I work full time. It really, really sucks. I’m not saying doing honest work (unlike Bill Gates et al) sucks. I’m saying that making minimum wage, at 65 years of age and therefore being unable to retire, sucks. In the meantime, here’s an index of my blog posts: https://arrby.wordpress.com/2021/02/01/the-covid-19-pandemic-hoax-index/

      • Walking Dead says:

        Arby, I did that so I could show others. When I recently tried to show a friend what is really going on, 3/4’s of my saved information was no longer available. TPTB must love how easy it is to change history these days, no longer have to burn the books, just use a button on the untrusted computer and BAMMM!!! it is history.

  10. TM says:

    Jon,
    Why can’t we get a clarification (if one is needed) for the CDC Document : “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” (Updated/Effective : 12/2020) whereby is is indicated as follows: Page 42 ” Limit of Detection” ; specifically 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence .”Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA …” I just have a question as to why THE CDC does not have “virus isolates” – this is the CDC… any sample they have would be quantified..so after more than a year, they still have not cornered a sample of the actual virus??

  11. ReluctantWarrior says:

    Important article by health researcher Bill Sardi about the treatment of Coronavirus, COVID-19 etc. with Lysine. Cheap and highly effective with little or no risk.

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/no_author/virologists-report-poor-mans-amino-acid-cure-for-covid-19-would-abolish-need-for-vaccines/

      • Arby says:

        There is no covid 19! I recommend you read around on Jon Rapport’s Blog. It’s at: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

        • I have read everything Jon has written…
          I have been frequenting this site for well on to ten years if not more…I have all three of Matrix programs. I have read and listened to his words every single day.

          There is a bad and sometimes nasty flu! A rather tough flu that is rather testing on the old ones, along with the death panel idealism.

          And COVID-19 is, the conflation of that yearly, that seasonal fact, along with other conflated numbers…the recent version is a bit tough to deal with, especially if you are comorbid or have weak immunity.

          That fact can’t be denied.

          COVID-19 is a rebranding of an old adversary to some, an old friend to others.
          If someone is comorbid and in possible danger, the flu is deal with at an early stage? Then Ivermectin can be a miracle.

          Strangely it is an anti-parasitic, which feeds into my own theory of the pneumonia so many experience as a virulent form of Staphylococcus aureus — normally a commensal organism in a healthy human which has become rather deadly globally and recently because of overuse and abuse of antibiotics by doctors and the patients. Along with other toxic problems that have enabled its deadly nature. It is alarming to find most people never complete the regiment of antibiotic treatment.

          Have you noticed there is no flu this year and last…

          COVID-19: the idea, the fear, the economy killer, the family destroyer and the polarizer of a population; the Great Resetter.
          The virus, the religion based on scientism does not exist. But there is a bad flu the last few seasons, but never bad enough to take a vaccine.
          Nothing is bad enough to take a vaccine.

          The flu has always been a natural population control.

    • Jello says:

      Lysine is also helpful to those who suffer with fever blister/cold sore outbreaks. And cats who have a common viral infection (sneezing & snotting), usually associated with cats from shelters, can be effectively treated with L-Lysine. Just FYI.

  12. Béla Bartók says:

    They have already translated Project Imannuel’s first part into English:

    Look for “Project Immanuel – Announcement” (the system doesn’t allow me to post links)

    Project Imannuel is made by Stefan Lanka with a group of video makers. They take some time to translate the videos into the different languages.

    I think this video is good for sharing on the Internet because it explains things clearly.

  13. End Rockefeller Medicine says:

    We’re at the point, past the point, of thinking that just because something CAN be done, should it? Yes, ivory makes a great material for sculptors, but should it be used? Plastic products CAN be made from oil, but SHOULD it? Gene editing can be done, but should it? How can we constantly make the mistake of dominating nature, when life itself is based on a delicate balance of cooperation and interdependency? Sure, small businesses can be squelched, but should they be? The food system CAN be robotized and monopolized, but should it be? We need international laws that uphold and protect the ancient science of our living systems that the technocrats playing God are so recklessly willing to disrupt and destroy. Will they even win? Or will life itself quantize them out of existence, as a defense mechanism that our bodies treat any foreign invader. I’m betting on the billions of years of wisdom against them.

    • Arby says:

      “We need international laws that uphold and protect the ancient science of our living systems that the technocrats playing God are so recklessly willing to disrupt and destroy.” We need another Corporatocracy? We are imperfect and only the Creator can fix that. You don’t get perfect systems from imperfect, limited, humans.

      I do believe that love counts. I use the illustration of a rickety house to explain my view of economics. A house can be rickety, with all kinds of stuff breaking down and in need of repair, but if the family that dwells inside of that house has love and each member looks after each other, then they will get by. That’s ‘not’ our world. Our world is, sadly, one of predator-parasites and those (especially parents) who actually would like law & order. That’s ‘primarily’ why this sytem of things doesn’t work. But there are other issues, including the big one, namely the Issue of Universal Sovereignty (fairly settled): Is God’s way of love the best? or Is Satan’s ‘Riches For The Strongest’ best?

      That Issue (court case, lesson) is about over. The Judge will then act and those playing God (who will not reform, will not relent and can’t be protested away) will be destroyed. This perverted, cruel sysetm of things, and those who have invested their souls (everything) in it, will be removed. Period. Then we who remain (and uphold God’s standards of love, justice, truth and compassion) can build our world. God doesn’t micromanage but he is our heavenly Father and not everything goes in his universe.

      • Walking Dead says:

        If you believe you are being bullshitted, what makes you think that a book written by man some 60 to 70 years after Jesus died is the truth? Do you think the bullshit just started recently?

  14. JayB says:

    Why aren’t Antibody Tests IgM and IgG being done routinely? Because when people are shown to have their own antibodies to the virus there really is no justification to be vaccinated $$. The antibody serology tests are far more accurate than the PCR tests with relatively few false positives or negatives.

    • JennyM says:

      I’m just guessing they aren’t doing antibody tests because that would show there is no ‘novel corona virus’. They haven’t even isolated it. Its a regular flu or cold or whatever and they’re making people sick with toxic food, nutritional deficiencies and 5 G and round Up and everything else out there, but blaming it on some virus so they can finish destroying any rights we thought we had.
      Plus these nursing homes (if what I read is truthful) some of them are vaccinating dead people in them to get their vax numbers up and look good for the “authorities”, who I’m assuming is Bill Gates and Fauci.

      • Jim S Smith says:

        Most of these late nursing home deaths, are deliberate, premeditated murder!

        They were just the politically-useful pawns in the pursuit of controlling the population through continued panic and hysteria – over a purported “virus”. Yeah, these older folks were going to die eventually anyway, but it seems to me that their passing was “helped” along.

        I have very few good things to say about the nursing home industry at large!

  15. Jt Kong says:

    I agree 1000%. The PCR test is the beating heart of the covid fraud. The Wuhan mob, and their hand puppet Fauci admit positives at Ct Values greater than 35 are false. Even this admission is damage control, since the Sars Cov2 chimera can’t be cultured over 24.

    I’ve spent the last 6 months calling the WHO and other “health” officials asking about Ct Values. One can only hope people wake up soon so the damage from their synthetic nucleic filth can be limited.

  16. Mos Craciun says:

    European Court of Human Rights :

    “With respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:

    7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;

    7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated” With respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:

    https://theirishsentinel.com/2021/01/29/european-court-of-human-rights-voted-that-prohibits-member-states-from-making-vaccination-against-the-coronavirus-mandatory/

  17. Eluard says:

    Covid-19 and the PCR Test walk into a bar. Start throwing them back.

    “You know,” declares the PCR, “many people say you don’t exist.”

    “Many people,” replies Covid-19, “say, while you exist you are totally false.”

    “At least I exist.”

    “How can I not exist? I just bought you a round.”

    “Anyone could have put a bill down and bought a beer.”

    “Well, God too has many doubters. He has priests and I have you, my pal the PCR test.”

    “Louie, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.”

    “Funny you should say that. Bogie, I’m told, died of Covid-19.”

    “How is that possible? Bogart died in 1957.”

    “You’re saying I didn’t exist then either? Then nor did you my Kary Mullis invented wanna-be.”

    “You’re really obfuscating the issue.”

    “What do you think I was designed to do?”

    “You’re really confusing me. Or is it the cheap beer?”

    “Voila. Confusion. You’ve finally discovered your true calling.”

    “Which is?”

    “You search for the unfindable and present it as obviously there.”

    “So I’m talking to myself right now?”

    “No. Neither of us is talking. Fear itself is talking through us, using our voices.”

    “Fear is doing a monologue in two voices.”

    “You’ve got the whole game.”

    “Right there.”

    “Right there.”

    “Bartender–another round.”

    The bar is closed.

  18. Mike Groves says:

    There is an Australian Government Freedom of information request, dated 12th January 2021, reply confirming that they hold no documents which shows scientific evidence that covid-19 tests can identify the virus. The decision reads; I am notifying you of my decision under section24A of the FOI Act to refuse your request for access, as the documents you have requested do not exist. I have a copy of the document but I do not know if it is genuine.

  19. William Jeffreys says:

    Jon, You’re doing good work here. I am thankful there are still people like you out there combating the nonsense.

  20. za ka lu says:

    How does it become a man to behave toward the American government
    today? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it.

    I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization
    as my government..
    THOREAU
    1849

  21. Larry C says:

    Chemist Kary Mullis invented the PCR test.

    The PCR test is the Gold Standard for testing for COVID 19. (An estimated 95% of ALL tests for COVID 19, have used the Mullis PCR test.)

    Mr. MillIS flatly declared that his PCR test – THE TEST HE DEVISED – could *not* be used to test for COVID 19.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kary_Mullis

  22. Regards hhi:

    “These people are generally atheists who believe in the scientific method, a belief that originated in the 17th century and has polluted all original thought…”

    Eloquence is not my best suit, it’s difficult to get to; usually it on the top shelf, and such a bother to get to, but as someone keeps whispering in my ear “You get more flies with honey than a sledgehammer, so here goes…

    ‘These people’ such a derogatory term, a raspy twist of the tongue that been overused, I was impulsive and have an innate dislike of those who corrupt a thing. That being science. It is not the truth, but it is possible that it is as close as we might get to as humans to what we are, and what this wonderfully tragic thing is that we all seem to be part of, or not.

    The scientific method was a purer truth than anything that had come along in quite some time, it served its purpose but is corrupted now, not out of the sense of the method, but in the fact that there are no honest men, at least not in the scientific field. Every single scientist has lost the ability to be objective (Specialization has killed the once fully developed and whole mind).

    Freud when he lectured at Clark on his first visit to the US gave three lectures on consecutive nights of his recent hypotheses, in German. The house was packed each and every time. I doubt that would happen now. There has been a dilution of talent and a shortened and far too highly focused attention span on one thing now. To much hyperfocus.

    Now don’t take that lightly (objectivity), that is a very difficult thing to do, to objectify oneself from what one is doing, takes great strength of character. And that kind of character is developed by being taught by those who have character. To be willing to toil away at, something so exciting that you believe you have discovered, something that has consumed you every waking moment and then, in the end, find you were misdirected by your own ego; you were wrong or, a pushy boss or a jealous thesis advisor misdirected you; an accolade or a tight schedule pushed far too hard; a bonus if it works, got in your way.
    These are tough obstacles for young minds to navigate – and when the propaganda of the day is for one to be a geeky nerd who discovers something wonderful and save the world. Well, the allure is, almost drug-like. We have witnessed sitcoms that elevate the nerd to godlike status in the minds of the public.

    And the human mind is driven by the narrative, it like stories, and it especially likes stories with a happy ending and success.

    Science is the religion of technocrats — well actually scientism, science has been subverted and is bent twisted into a totally different thing, it is an amalgam of science and pure capitalism with a heavy perfuming of the social narrative. And generally, pure capitalism is the predominant aspect of this new religion, followed by the narrative as the science lags behind.

    It’s a – in an Orwellian sort of doublespeak the language and the method of the new technocracy, the local, the colloquialism of this global government which is finally after so many years willing to admit openly that this is what it has been up to all these many, many decades if one looks close enough that is…

    All through those many years since Newton, there have been gatekeepers who have made sure that the club kept clean of any interlocutors who might simply, raise a highly intelligent hand and say “But what if we look at this way?”

    Science was bought and paid for at the beginning of this industrial paradigm, medicine and medical schools owned by the turn of the 19th century — the very moment Newton exclaimed his wisdom of the Universe to the ignorantly wealthy to avoid what truth that might bring to their hegemonic romp across the globe lusting oceans of wealth and the enormous power that it brings. They even built an institution to it and initiated only those who would submit to those at the top. A long illustrious career in obeyance brings great wealth and the accolades and adornments of a full career.

    Take a look at the myriad of medals and honorary doctorates and knighthoods and such attached to the name of the Nazi, Klaus Schwab, the gate-keeper of the Great Reset, and initiator of the ‘new young global leaders’ being peppered across this global technocracy being built.

    I have digressed… Since that time (Newton), is has been a constant corrupting by the immense wealth available, the immense wages and awards and medals and false merit easily available and bred into the bright young scientist since he was a child, whose soul has been thwarted in its natural evolution here…history is filled to the brim with the tragedies of the ones who would not submit, who were strong enough and had enough natural character to oppose the oppressing.

    Science is owned and patented, life has ownership and cannot be used without the purchase or in many cases remains secret. Intellectual property is a thing, and in the end, we discover that Newton was not so right, that laws are not fixed and are evolving along with all the rest.

    This is a story of evil as a substance as it is sprinkled into each and every human endeavour.

    And now, the Big Tech 5, thwart innovation, the innovation that would make them obsolete.

    Take, for instance, the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) and the well-funded, United Front Work Department of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (UFWD). Which funds with enormous sums the ‘Thousand Talents Program’ (TTP).

    The aim of the TTP is to drain the west of any and all of its top brains, and all its top and leading-edge scientists, and engineers, IT specialists, medical experts and medical scientists, and especially AI front runners. The CCP is the perfect technocratic society, an example for the technocrats.
    It will pay enormous amounts to these experts to set up shop in China, with, position in a prominent university – usually as a head of a department and a stable of highly intelligent graduate students. And buckets of awards throughout a year, with a special dinner and visiting peers and gold watches and trips for the family etc, etc.

    The lure is unbearable, temptation, it is ripe like winning the lottery, and scientific minds generally being atheists have no resistance, no real immunity to that corrupting factor. They are gifted physical people in what they believe, and have been taught it is a material universe, “Why not prosper from those scientific gifts, why not excel and become what ego desires? Why allow politics and nationhood to govern what should be a technocratic world run by scientists and engineers who know what the real truth is?”

    And so, real science suffers and is denied. In the end, one is left with, ‘how to separate the corporation from the science and its continuing evolution; how to make all men honest or find a new way to understand the physical universe’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *