Another solution to lockdowns: The Constitutional lawyers

An open letter and an offer

by Jon Rappoport

December 30, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

There are a few principles involved in any effort to change the direction of fascist control.

One person alone doing or saying something may have an effect.

Two hundred people—each on his own—doing or saying the same basic thing—will have a significant effect.

Two hundred people—some alone and some together—will have a larger effect.

A person who sees himself as isolated and alone will probably not believe his actions have any effect. So he stays silent. He could have an IQ of 90 or 190; he stays silent.

The primary mistake lockdown opponents are making comes down to: failure to see the bigger picture.

And the big picture is composed of many different individuals and groups taking action of various kinds—which add up to a tsunami of our own, against the wall-to-wall messaging of the lockdown liars and fascists.

I’ve read a great deal of what constitutional lawyers have to say about the lockdowns. I’m not talking about heroic lawyers who are actively filing lawsuits against governments. I mean lawyers who are largely spelling out problems in bringing these cases to court.

Problems having to do with judges, with the intricacies of the law, with past court decisions, with technical issues.

If two hundred of those lawyers instead turned their attention to BASIC constitutional foundations, and published papers and essays and spoke out on THAT subject, we would see a tide beginning to turn in our favor.

Constitutional lawyers are, first and foremost, supposed to understand the underlying meaning and purpose of the Constitution, which takes precedent over minutiae.

If they can’t see the forest for the trees, they should pack up their offices and seek other work.

So let me repeat what I’ve been saying for months. There is a constitutional line that can’t be crossed for ANY reason. A government can’t take away the freedom of citizens because some disaster has occurred.

This goes beyond the question of whether the disaster is real or imagined. It doesn’t matter. Freedom to live, to live out in the open, to work, to do business, to survive, is untouchable.

There are a million ways to spell this out. I challenge constitutional lawyers to DO IT. Not just a few lawyers. MANY. Go to work. Your area of focus is the jackpot of all legal focuses: the Constitution itself, why it is there, what it means, what it is FOR.

What are you waiting for? The sky to collapse?

Why aren’t 200 or 5000 of you turning into tigers?

Are you trying to prove to doomsayers that they’re right and we’re all irretrievably going down the drain?

Is that your final response to the constitutional crisis we’re facing?

Is the measure of your worth the amount of dilly-dallying you can perform on the minutiae surrounding the eternal struggle for FREEDOM?

Realize that if a few hundred of you publish and speak out, you can have an enormous effect.

I understand that some of you know very little about gaining publicity for your views. I do know something about gaining publicity for the truth. If a group of 20 of you comes to me, I will give you what I can to help you achieve visibility.

Turn your attention to writing and speaking on behalf of the people, instead of the media and your colleagues. Come to grips with what first inspired you to study the founding documents of the Republic—before the practicalities of your profession turned you into…

Whatever you are now.

If you think I’m being unduly harsh on you, take a look at the economic and political landscape. Look at the devastation. Ask yourself under what banner this tyrannical operation marches. And what it is doing to people.

Everyone speaks of “culture” these days. Well, you constitutional lawyers can influence the culture directly. You can make a heroic stand. You can make your words have fire, just as the words of Paine and John Adams and Samuel Adams ignited minds, when it counted.

Be heroes, not clerks.







The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

81 comments on “Another solution to lockdowns: The Constitutional lawyers

  1. glenn says:

    We have seen ruling of unconstitutional actions fail to stop illegal mandates. The emergency declaration will always override the constitution as they can argue the importance of protection of life in it. You have to challenge the emergency. By not challenging the emergency it by default becomes true and gives unlimited power to the government. Challenge the proof of the emergency and leaders will have to provide solid evidence that they don’t have.

    • Thankful says:

      Exactly!!! Go to make americans free again….they are litigating the “EMERGENCY” that isn’t….

      Thanks Jon for your encouraging articles and giving us truthful information….

      • Joyce says:

        Yes! Pam Popper is great. She along with the Ohio group filed 600 page lawsuit against gov DeWine in Ohio where he has to prove it’s an emergency. Their goal is for all 50 states file lawsuits. She has conference call weekly where you can learn how to do this. I’m in PA. is there even one judge who isn’t corrupt. I’m thinking not.

        • I don´t know how it makes sense to people to submit the covid controversy, or any controversy to the fake corporate courts where we KNOW good and well that the judges are corrupt and that they lie whenever needed. I´m outraged that Popper believes that the fake non-“emergency” would repeal the Constitution. Even if a state of emergency existed, there is nothing in the Constitution to suggest that this somehow repeals or amends the Constitution. The Constitution has a very clearcut protocol for being amended, and claiming “emergency” isn´t it.

          • Sonia H. says:

            Geo Bush II apparently said that the Constitution is “just a piece of paper”. If he did indeed say this – and it is possible that he was misquoted, misunderstood or taken out of context – nevertheless he is CORRECT. The Constituion was written hundreds of years ago for a certain population. We are now a completely different set of people. And that’s it.

    • Frank says:

      True that.

      File Freedom Of Information Acts en masse..

      The point about most lawyers with a bar license is that they make an oath to the BAR..

      The last thing one should do is to get together and file a class action lawsuit.. because when doing so the courts bundle every plaintiff cause into one big box as their own definition of pidgeon-hole screwball highfaluten legalese mumbo-jumbo reason for denying relief.

      The solution from a plaintiff perspective, IS:
      One. Person…..
      One. Case. At. A. Time.
      100’s of them.
      1,000’s of them.
      10,000’s of them.
      100,000’s of them.
      1,000,000’s of them.

      File Freedom Of Information Act requests, as a first move.. millions of them.
      In every state.
      In every county.
      In every city.
      In every court.

      Have these constitutional lawyers draw up draft plaintiff *lawsuit word compilations that provide example templates, but stress that each plaintiff needs to change the wording and tactics so they don’t match other plaintiffs.
      *Similar to Legal Zoom templates;
      These constitutional lawyers may have their BAR license threatened for merely writing templates.. but. SO.. sue THE BAR..every BAR…local, State, national for preventing them from selling a perfectly legitimate plaintiff-suit-template-service like Legal Zoom does!







      • M - says:

        “overwhelm the system”. Good point. One that Robert Bilott has done for over 20 years against DuPont.

        After watching “Dark Waters” (at one point I even said out loud “He’s an angel.”) I read the book it was based on (Exposure). The detail of corruption, blatant lies, and MALICE was mind-blowing.

        On page 363 Bilott states that in law, malice means CONSCIOUS DISREGARD.

        DuPont kept stonewalling, stalling, and gaming the legal system hoping Bilott would go away. But he didn’t. He’s still fighting that same fight right now in 2020. Bilott never gave up because he knew it was the right thing to do. The “right thing to do”…what a concept, huh?

        After reading Exposure, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Governments, Corporations, Politicians, and Officials are USELESS. They will always have their best interests in mind, and will do and say anything to retain the status quo. I kinda already felt this way, but seeing it laid out in such detail over a period of 20-odd years was irrefutable. They will never risk their livelihoods for the sake of “doing the right thing”.

        I think people are still too trusting of these entities, but perhaps what’s going on today may open enough eyes that we can collectively start implementing change tomorrow.

        There are more “angels” out there, but they won’t be found in Governments, Corporations, or amongst Politicians.

        Perhaps the angels are us. Perhaps we are LEGION.

      • jane mariouw says:

        they did just storm the castle… and looks like they lost. ????. Trump is being threatened no doubt.
        the worst is that innocent people died.

    • Larry says:

      We have to do both. As long as there is this perception of a virus, it doesn’t matter how many times we say ‘but it isn’t that deadly’, all they have to do is ramp up the numbers and show body bags on TV and everybody loses their heads.

      I am really dismayed by the professions generally. They seem to attract such small brains these days, people who can’t look beyond ‘they’re telling us to do this so we have to go along’. It’s pitiful.

      I believe every profession should have an oath of some kind to uphold what is right by the principles of their discipline. People should be told on day one of college – being a professional takes guts, and if you just want an easy life, leave now, you have already failed the course.

      • Sonia H. says:

        “…all they have to do is ramp up the numbers and show body bags on TV and everybody loses their heads.”

        Loses their sht is more like it. And in most cases, they never had any head to lose in the first place anyway. Aspartame, fluoride, mercury have done their work.

        What portion of the population even knows what is meant by “cases” – those numbers which are intoned every day, countlessly, on the news? Betcha they think it means there are such & such a number of folks who are writhing around in bed (at home or hospital) with high fever, chest pain, etc. Many of whom will die soon. The ones who don’t die will have “aftereffects” forever. That’s what people think.

        TPTB knew what they were doing when they decided make a fetish of that word “Cases”. Pure magic.

    • Walking Dead says:

      History repeats itself, and the people forget.

    • DC Miami says:

      You are correct, but proving the absence of something is inherently difficult or impossible. Emergency power must be strictly curtailed, if not outright eliminated. This is the blank check they will keep using.

    • Tatiana says:

      2 excellent videos pls listen esp. #2

      #Agenda #socialist #USelection2020
      Curtis Bowers: A Socialist Agenda Is Underway | Crossroads with Joshua Philipp

    • Jeff Carmack says:

      You’re describing what has happened. Jon is talking about what is right.

      Did you consider that in challenging the emergency, it becomes validated and more concrete in our reality?

  2. Opie Poik says:

    Catherine Austin Fitts on the bankster machinations hidden behind the scamdemic psyop curtain:

    She could be Grandma relating a recipe. So casually matter-of-fact. A pro.

  3. Paul says:

    “There are a few principles involved…”

    “And we know
    that all things work together
    for good
    to those who love God,
    to those who are the called
    according to His purpose.”
    Romans 8:28.

    “…action of various kinds—
    which add up
    to a tsunami
    of our own…”

    ~ “…the eternal struggle for FREEDOM?”

    May Your Offer Be Taken.
    This I pray.

  4. Sean says:

    Wow I should have been a Constitutional Lawyer. Since Im not, I would financially support them. Forever. Like I do Ohios. Great idea. Smoke them out Jon.

  5. Roark says:

    JON, BE SURE to watch / listen to Pam Popper if you haven’t!!

    She does make the point that the excuse being used in the courts is that covid1984 overrides any Constitutional Rights.

    Regardless, this is the excuse used. She says we have to put the burden of proof on the courtroom regarding Covid being the threat we are continuously told that it is!

    • Lyn P says:

      The statement, indeed even a serious THOUGHT, that “covid194 overrides Constitutional rights” is utterly horrifying and describes the basis of the destruction of the USA that is underway.

      Aided and abetted by all the con-artists, communists, power-hungry, tyrannical, and profiteering players….but nevertheless, that captures it.

    • Andra Saltzberg says:

      Dr. Pam Popper has recently stated (in an Interview with Spiro Skouras) that the thrust of her/their actions is based upon having the the Feds justify/define an “emergency”. This in light of numerous failed (apparently) Constitutional challenges across the US.

    • Sean says:

      Yep she just came onto my radar. Thanks!

    • As a BAR attorney for some 40+ years, until I resigned in disgust in 2019. I did quite a bit of trial work, appeal work, criminal defense, custody, and even filed a class action or two, but the corporate tribunals calling themselves “courts” DO NOT WORK FOR US. What Ohio´s Pam Popper doesn´t understand is that “Constitutional lawyers” have loyalties to the black robed corporate employee calling himself a “judge”. And those loyalties far exceed any loyalties he may have to the client. I was never that way and was constantly attacked for it. Now I´m doing common law, instead of playing the same sick corporate games that got us here to begin with. I expect to have the very corrupt Michael DeWine served with my first Notice of Liability (for his role in the covid/5G debacle)in a matter of a couple of weeks. I don´t plan on having this drag on the way the fake corporate litigation does.

  6. ak in vt says:

    Thank you again, Jon

    A suggestion or two (so I can’t count) to all:

    1. raise money and put it into an escrow to support local businesses if they get fined or shut down or refuse to shut down and get harassed. Do the same for anyone fined for NOT wearing a mask, or whatever other silly mandates are put into place. This money can also be used to fund lawyers if necessary.

    2. Support, support, support local businesses and friends and neighbours as best as you can. If a business is shut, do business after hours, do pick-up, etc… Many a chef will be glad to prepare meals from home and you pick-up from there (don’t pay the chef, donate money to pay his/her bills). Same goes for produce sellers, farmers, fish mongers, bakers, you name it.

    3. Barter. And set up some system of bartering for things that are more expensive than a loaf of bread or a peck of apples — like repairs, appliance installation, lawn mowing, whatever. Honesty is most important. Barter what you can in advance of needing the more expensive work you will or may need in the future. If you get ripped off after advance bartering and then no reciprocating to you on the deal, so be it; count that as a lesson learned and forewarn your neighbours and friends (how many times have you paid cash for some thing or a service and found it to be lacking or even not receiving it?).

    “Swamp creatures” will leave “the Swamp” if there is no food. And the food of “Swamp creatures” is money. Stop feeding the “Swamp creatures.”


    AK in VT

    • Frank says:

      I agree with most of your points except the part about paying fines from the medical mafia..

      Let those fines sit on docket. They have no way of enforcing payment of such…if they invent such rights to force payment of medical fines.. then SUE the aggressors.. by the millions.

      Overwhelm the system with resistance….do so by a thousand cuts.. a million cuts.

      Death-by-a-thousand-cuts work both ways.

  7. Linda Becker says:

    Jon Rappaport-please watch this one as soon as you possibly can. It’s at the core of a lot of what’s happening. And, I hope this woman who came forward will be protected:

    • Larry says:

      Yes they’ve been doing this for decades. The anthrax programme was nothing short of aiding and abetting the enemy in time of war. Basically it knowingly took out countless thousands of soldiers chemically on behalf of the enemy. Plenty of evidence. The people supporting the programme could legitimately be taken out militarily with no trial, just as surely as if they were caught bombing a military base.

  8. Amber says:

    Another excellent EFFECTIVE solution from Jon. However, I think there are also real and fake Constitutional lawyers like Allan Dershowitz who said that the state has the authority to force jab you with a vaccine. Jon’s article above should also be an open letter to them and sent to each. How do we find them? We could also find one good one who can organize the rest of them. Is that a possibility? The same with Constitutional Sheriffs. Some one needs to lead this effort. What if we made a central hub for these lists we need where all can contribute?

    We could / should also make a parallel solution to where we really need to head ourselves:

  9. Larry says:

    Jon, as individuals the most important thing we can do is maintain contact with each other and our communities – physical and online. And yet I see people drawing in and away from each other.

    All year I have been writing to prime minsters, CEOs and so on. I have been putting Trip Advisor reviews against small business bourgois collaborators with their ridiculous covid checkpoints and those who give unqualified medical advice. I have given feedback on government and medical websites and so on. And endless, endless discussion in person, helping others to get their heads around the issues. Most are super grateful, and sceptical, but struggle to formulate their thoughts on all this.

    Our actions have to go outside of social media. But I believe most people are just hunkering down, getting cosy and waiting for this to pass. Never mind, they also serve who stand and wait, I suppose. It’s still part of the struggle.

    • From Elsewhere says:

      Larry, yes, the way to go is adding value, warming and intensifying all the relationships, friends, aquaintances, family from great distances: calling them and listening to their worries and wants, meeting them when possible, writing to them, encouraging and helping with kindness, positively reviewing those who do the good deeds, the right things, praising the happy cases and examples.

  10. Nora Claypool says:

    Oh, if only the “legal system” could be taken back by we the people, then we might get somewhere. The thing is, there are TWO constitutions; the original organic constitution for the united states of America, and the corporate constitution of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The original one derived from the Articles of Confederation, the corporate one was created by traitors in congress without the knowledge or permission of the people, and it has been in place of the original since 1871. You, me and all of us are collateral on a debt held by foreign bankers. You can read up on this travesty here

    We declared our independence you say? We might have, but we can all see something ain’t right when the courts dismiss all pro se lawsuits and the Supreme Court kicks out a case filed by our president, that risks overturning the whole fraudulent election we just witnessed. There’s a whole lot more to it, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

  11. Arthur Danu says:

    The point that is being SORELY MISSED in the comments, as well as by Jon himself, is that


    The idea that there is a group of “smart”, “certified” professionals that are “qualified” to read and interpret the Constitution with any certainty or precision beyond the public’s comprehension betrays the very notion of the PREAMBLE.

    “WE THE PEOPLE, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice and ensure domestic tranquility; provide for the common defense; promote the general welfare and; secure the blessings of liberty, to ourselves and our posterity, DO ORDAIN AND ESTABLISH this Constitution for The United States of America.”

    Each of you is ALREADY constitutionally qualified to judge the matter of public events in terms of the law ON YOUR OWN.

    You also have the POWER OF JURY NULLIFICATION to dispose of any law or mandate that you feel is immoral or unconstitutional.

    The idea that this problem will only be fixed if this group or that group finally got their act together and DID SOMETHING, is all bluster because each of us is afraid to admit that WE DON’T WANT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for what’s going on. We want someone else to clean up the mess that has spilled into all of our lives.

    It’s going to get worse…until it gets better.

    This is ADULT TALK, not the endless blaming and complaining and fantasizing of CHILDREN.

    VISIT to Empower Yourself to Act intelligently, and to empower yourself to act magickally!

    • Lyn P says:

      We MUST get jury trials back. This is a key area also manipulated by the scamdemic plotters to postpone justice….to the point where the new, evil world order is firmly in place and we can’t go back and correct it.

      No existing method of recourse within the system was missed by these evil-doers in terms of altering or ruining it….to keep advancing the goals.

    • Jello says:

      You also have the POWER OF JURY NULLIFICATION to dispose of any law or mandate that you feel is immoral or unconstitutional.
      Absolutely! Thanks for bringing this up.

      For those who would like more info:
      What is Jury Nullification?

      Fully Informed Jury Association

    • Sean says:

      Nice. True. And Nudging Constitutional lawyers is also a great idea too.

      I have the lost horizon tax book.

  12. Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

    U.S Federal Law title II and VII of the Civil Rights Act.
    Code 42. Section 2000 (a)
    According to state and federal civil rights law, the individual has free and equal access to all facilities and services in a business establishment of public accomodation, regardless of store policies. Same holds true for local bus, taxi, train, plane and Uber/Lyft cars. Refusal of services will result in being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. (source:

    My further comment: I feel as if I have to start all over again as if in March 2020 because the pushback I’ve done since then has had no effect. I was harrassed by a Walmart entrance-guard today– and had to take an extra measure to “escape” them going in. This is harassment and I’ll deliver the above message in a direct manner next time. I’m tired of this.

    It appears that the work being done online showing how viruses are exosomes and that the normal body sheds dead cells all the time anyway… has not had any impact on people. The idea that disease is not contagious has not taken effect in the public mind either. If anything their perception of a killer virus and biohazardous people has doubled or tripled. Again, it seems like we have to start educating others all over again– despite the MSM doubling down on stupid theories.

    Dr. Andrew Kaufman who expounds on exosomes frequently online has been under constant attack by so called debunkers who don’t debunk. Kaufman is in accord with Jon however on the harm of pollution. It does appear that drinking water is worse than ever, cyanide in the air is worse…and chemtrails have not stopped… as well, 5G continues to be more advertised by Verizon… All the misconceptions we saw in March 2020 have only become worse, including the idea that vaccines can mitigate anything– despite graphs clearly showing vaccines coming in at the tail end of some disease cycle. Trump has done a big disservice by pandering to this via his warpspeeed nonsense.

    • Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

      I think the public is conflating virus and bacteria. Bacteria DO have the ability to move around on kitchen counters and meat and can create biohazardous lettuce as seen in recalls occasionally. Fungus is real and so is mould in air conditioning pipes from moisture… which can spread in the air. I’d like Jon to delineate those REAL airborne hazards from virus if he can– or if anyone has a good short article for public consumption at a high school level for this, that will work too. It seems to me that the phony virus idea has hijacked the real bacteria,mould and mildew ideas.

      • Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

        Sally FAllon and Tom Cowan wrote– The Contagion Myth– and one of their observations was the WUHAN was loaded with 5G-flipped-on in late 2019… and N. Italy was fully of DIESEL POLLUTION + 5G when it was seen as a hotspot. Cruise ships with 5G got hit bad with “covid” too. The Invisible Rainbow pointing to EM pollution during the Spanish Flu comes into play again. I’m looking at 5G as well as Jon’s pollution-theory AGAIN… NOW… because we just had that Christmas Memphis Bomber “Anthony Quinn” being blamed for the explosion and they say he was protesting 5G…. which brought, ironically, 5G to the surface of my considerations again.

        Jon never pointed to ONE CAUSE like 5G but I found Fallon and Cowan pointing to a severe exacerbation of oxygen-deprived syndromes and symptoms when 5G was used IN CONJUNCTION with high pollution. It’s the combo. Millenium Report points to a quaternery disease effect with vax and 5G– which is consistent with this added wrinkle.

      • Lyn P says:

        Yes, the whole “virus as dangerous contagion” is a very-long running mass deception that allows the money- and power-hungry to constantly abuse and frighten the public with stories of “invisible spread.” The same is not possible with mold, toxins in food, etc.

        I mourn really at both the extent of immorality among those who KNOW yet continue to promote this scam in their professional roles, as well as for the dumbed-down masses who cannot find their way out of these Tall Tales.

    • Tim_2A says:


      No offense, but I just re-read your comment, and then I realized what you (and I) had forgotten the first time.

      WE MUST BOYCOTT WALMART. Boycott Amazon, too.

      Neither entity could be more UN-American if they were to fly a U.N. flag, INSTEAD OF the Stars and Stripes. If that isn’t enough, one of Sam Walton’s female descendants is a PROMINENT co-founder of Bloomberg’s anti-gun group! “Eh, no big deal,” most people say. ‘We, The People,’ should NOT EVER say that.

      Mom-and-Pop stores NEED our patronage, or they’ll die out.
      Globalist-super-dominators DO NOT.

      Our economy, and nation, need to be rebuilt, so from our small city or town councils, up (or down, to the sewers?) to the elitist’s seats of influence, ‘We, The People’ need to express our disgust with them, and show them our determination to REMOVE* them from the ratholes they now occupy.

      To be perfectly clear:



      *I suppose we could fill their holes with concrete, and then smoke them out, or use a poisonous gas, but HANGING is what they deserve. Clean, humane, FINAL.

      P.S. Take a look at grrrgraphics(dot)com, Ben Garrison’s political cartoon blog. It’s darkly humorous, but hard-hitting.

      • Jello says:

        WE MUST BOYCOTT WALMART. Boycott Amazon, too.
        Absolutely!! What most people don’t seem to realize is that they can VOTE in more than just political elections. VOTE WITH YOUR DOLLARS! VOTE WITH YOUR ASSOCIATIONS! Vote daily!

        What could/would the world be like if people (en masse) stopped using the most prominent social media? OR stopped using the most prominent on-line shopping?? There ARE alternatives! And, if those alternatives become oppressive, then STOP using/supporting them also!

        As for the current ‘sick care’ system, STOP using those who are supporting it and/or are in agreement with it.

        Just my 2 cents worth!

  13. Gretchen says:

    Imagine al the people…………..WAKING UP!

    Why do some of us stay home and do nothing-and others stick their necks out and risk it all?

    Here is another event coming up with some more great Americans trying to help motivate and inspire others to get rid of their fear and ignorance of what is really going on so they wont feel alone or fearful to do their part to act so we can all put this ugly chapter of near enslavement behind us and round up the criminals responsible for it.

    “Dr Judy Mikovits and activist Peggy Hall unmask the truth behind the COVID vaccine, PCR testing, mask mandates & unlawful business closures.”

    San Diego County / Vista Ca. This coming Sunday Jan 3, 2021 from 3pm to 7pm Peggy Hall and Judy Mikovitz will speak.

  14. Rob says:

    Offtopic question: JON can you please speak about the excess death numbers? Are these numbers correct or lies?

    • Lyn P says:

      Personally I would not trust any global-level accounting of deaths. Too easy to manipulate, and to what body is that organization responsible? At least with national numbers by the usual orgs, there needs to be a certain level of validity because many will be able to scrutinize it at that level.

      Check out this article about the Johns Hopkins’ researcher who found NO excess deaths in the U.S. and very fishy attribution of “covid deaths” to say the least. You be the judge. Of course publication and wide discussion of this article was scrubbed.

  15. JB says:

    It’s like Ghandi said: DIS OBEY OPPRESSIVE ILLEGAL LAWS. What if you turn it around and just go ahead and do good buisness freely and have your patrons protect you when /if the police try to charge you will running a buisness. Challenge the very notion that you need a buisness licence; the very notion that any inpector can shut you down for rufusing to comply with orders. Do it in the right spirit, with faith joy and love, maybe the police will also refuse to follow orders to arrest you for disoberying. Stay together people, like our Canadian national anthem: Oh, canadians we stand on guard for three.” Stand up for your right to be free. You don’t need a law degree to understand that.

  16. Roundball Shaman says:

    The window of opportunity to act is closing quickly. The vise is being tightened on several fronts. And with each tightening, a large number of the world’s population begs for more of it.

    Anyone who has played sports – even disorganized sports out in an open field or court somewhere – knows that you can’t win if your teammates are not on the same page and you’re all working together. You might be able to cover for a slacker or maybe two, but if there’s more your efforts to win are doomed.

    This is what we’ve facing today. All of us are not playing the same game. And we are most certainly not on the same team.

    Billions of us are cheering for (are we bowing our heads reverently for… “The Science!”) and sacred Doctor Fraudci!… and more rules… and more lockdowns… and more shaming… and more jabs deep into our arms and into our hearts. In short, we are surrounded by idiots who are getting off on all this self-abuse.

    Billions more of us know we are in the fight of our lives bigger than anything most of us have ever faced. We know what’s at stake. We know what we’re losing. We know what our children are being robbed of. And yet, we are losing the battle right now.

    All the little dictators in towns and cities and States large and small are indulging their fondest tyrant fantasies beyond their wildest dreams. And the world is letting them do it. And every day, they get stronger and more bold and more outrageous.

    Can you win a football game with five players on your side of the ball? Can you win at basketball with three guys against five? Can you win the World Series without a shortstop, left fielder, and first baseman? We’re going to find out, because that’s the only way this biggest game of our lives going to be won.

    Too many people WANT to be told what to do. Too many people WANT to worship bought-and-paid-for “scientists” with dark hidden agendas. Too many people WANT to believe corporate media horse manure like junkies who need their next fix of crap every five minutes.

    Soon, the doorway will close. The windows will be nailed shut. The walls will be reinforced. And we’ll be locked inside with all those morons who are loving all this and begging for more. THAT is what’s at stake here. An eternity living with morons surrounded by an Iron Fist.

  17. DC Miami says:

    Jon, I love your writings but in this day and age it is clear that the courts will not provide any remedy in our present day society. That should be self-evident by now. It renders your entire premise completely moot.

    • Lyn P says:

      Yes, the Courts are basically the final Pillar of what our society is supposed to stand for in terms of rights and justice. VERY hard fought-for over hundreds of years. We are going backwards in this regard and this is the communists’ wet dream because it is how their power becomes complete.

      Until hot revolution by the masses, if such a phenomenon remains possible.

      • Frank says:

        All inequities, throughout all of history, promulgated by the commoners’ favorite self-annointed “King’s and Queen” have been rebalanced/re-adjusted, precisely because such inequities create a vacuum (imbalance) of power, aggressive power that no longer serves the species; The Universe is built for such re-adjustment of power gone rogue..depend on it.

        • Sonia H. says:

          By way of…massive natural disasters, perhaps? That is still better than being given the choice of taking endless vaccines or having every freedom taken from you. If you can’t shop, you starve. Better to die in an earthquake. Sorry.

          • Frank says:

            Human nature is just that, a part of the natural rebalancing act, simply because the system of human organization does not work any longer.

            Through disbelief, humans are capable of blocking this rebalancing of inequities…until of course the pain gets so severe that they are forced to fight back.

    • Walking Dead says:

      When blood starts flowing out, instead of in, the judges and news propagandists will do what they are supposed to be doing.

    • Tim_2A says:


      Thankfully, Jon did NOT mention using the courts for this exceptionally important part of our battle, but he did ask for those ‘Constitutional’ scholars who’ve attended (and presumably graduated from) a ‘law’ school, to write and publish some things to help bring home the point(s) of our argument(s) to the unlearned, and/or the ignorant.

      If we’re ever in the regrettable position of having to resort to the courts, we’d best resign ourselves to a long and difficult fight. A fight such as that would be one wherein the majority of our supposed ‘peers,’ most of whom are overwhelmingly tainted by their adherence to the perpetual MSM-shoveled manure of the deep state actors, their inevitable social media fixations, or an unspoken, yet ‘somehow undeniable’ disbelief in the ‘election truther’ and ‘anti-vaxxer’ agendas, will then have the responsibility put upon them to decide OUR cause’s, and OUR NATION’S, FATE.

      ANY ‘judge,’ prosecutor, or ‘defense’ attorney (of course, ALL BAR members), will side with whichever faction guarantees them a future, filled with ‘personal and professional prestige,’ and of course POWER.

      THAT, in the final analysis, IS what THE ENTIRETY of this confrontation is about.

      We, The People, NOT ‘they,’ HAVE THAT POWER.

      We MUST refresh the ‘tree of liberty.’

      Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God, so God wins, in the end.

    • 13-laci says:

      Sadly, you are probably right. The whole thing will likely become another department for the “billable hour” crowd.
      Check out the collection here: and see what the judicial system has become.

  18. Donna says:

    It’s not necessary to go to law school and pass the bar to be a lawyer. Know the law inside and out from top to bottom. Peggy Hall,, provides tools on her web site that should help most people when dealing with legal issues surrounding covid restrictions.

    There is also a group of volunteers called Constitutional Law Group. You can learn more here:

    The case brought against the governor of Ohio by attorney Tom Renz is having some positive successes. This litigation has generated new litigation in New Mexico. With each case, Tom learns from it. The case in New Mexico will be better and stronger than the one in Ohio. Whatever state becomes the third litigation case, will have an even stronger case. You can read about it here:

    There is no emergency.

  19. hhi says:

    The burden of proof has been flipped.

    We have to prove something invisible doesn’t exist whereas the “authorities” can not prove SARS-Cov2 exists.

    The Emergency Orders need to be challenged on the facts. If the case can proceed to Discovery, then the plaintiff can ask for scientific proof of the virus and its transmissability. What Health Authorities say is just hearsay unless proof is provided.

    I got out of law 20 years ago – to escape the matrix.

    Exosomes need to be stored at -70C – same as PEG (artificial exosome lipid). So as exosomes have the same protein composition as “viruses” then it follows that viruses also need to be stored at -70C if they were to remain functional outside of its aqueous habitat.

    Therefore viruses would immediately become dessicated when coming in contact with the atmosphere.

    Any Material scientists out there ?

  20. Greg Weldon says:

    “We the people” represented a specific people. Do these people still exist? Did social security change the status of “We the People”? I am of the opinion that are under Martial Law Rule. Are the courts of Common Law open? What does the fringed flag in the court room represent?

  21. Jim S Smith says:

    Why not the average citizen do some of the work some of these over-priced “lawyers” won’t do?

    After all,

    If the legal paradigm is “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, then that also means it is the DUTY of every “Citizen” to “Know the Law”. Therefore, knowing the very basics of the law under the originally-understood constraints upon government(s), is also part of that “civic-duty” to “Know the law”.

    Another vantage point to look at:

    Citizen-initiated ARTICLE III COURTS. (That is, from under Article III of the Constitution of the United States.) – The main reason there is so much inertia in getting a Constitutional Question before the eyes of the present day courts, is because these “courts” are NOT created by ARTICLE III, but by Acts of CONgress – and are therefore, not obliged to operate under the Constitution.

    So, it will take more work in THAT direction – to become effective.

    Most of these establishment-accredited lawyers are NOT educated on the intricacies of the REAL interpretations and applications of the “law” as intended by our Nation’s Founders, and under the Constitution authored by them. – It also helps much, to read and understand the full story as written in the Federalist Papers, and the Anti-Federalist Papers. It is only by reading through both sides of the early argument – that one can come to appreciate what many of these early, very well educated folks were thinking.

    I would also highly recommend that folks go check out Ron Paul’s very educational websites! He is one of the very few who was not anywhere near as corrupted from his time in office (about thirty years in congress), that has become “business as usual” for most who are still there.

    • Frank says:

      The only challenge with Ron Paul as a messenger, is that his tone is too soft and non-combative.. we have to fight fire with fire (a reference to when all else fails and there is no other resource remaining to fight an actual fire – forest fire fighters will tell you this!)

      THIS Control Freak overreach is now PERSONAL.. because it will extinguish us!

      Thus, every strategy and tactic is fair in this war for our very survival as a species!

      This pacifist idealogy that has pervaded popular culture/religion/politics for several millennia is a misunderstood philosophy of ‘turning-the-other-cheek.. sure, when someone smites you on the being a trite issue…. simply offering the OTHER cheek is the best way to diffuse the agressor..same way with someone demanding your coat when they are cold..
      BUT, when we are going through the valley-of-the-shadow-of-death we have to fight with fire-with-fire!!!

      Here’s a riddle for the pacifist: A (non-selective) pacifist and a soldier come before the throne of God; the pacifist died because he/she allowed the whole family to be murdered in cold innocent blood; the soldier died because he was (a) defending the pacifist’s inalienable right to non-resistance, and (b) he, the soldier, fully armed, died preventing his own family from being murdered in innocent blood.
      God says to the soldier: “Greater love has no one than a man lay down his life for his friends, please enter into paradise.” Then God, says: “Who’s next?” The pacifist says: “What about me?” God responds: “You can wait awhile for my answer, as I have an eternity to think about your fate because your entire family does not need help on earth.”
      A further question to the pacifist: Put yourself in God’s shoes; You created humans to dwell as the dominant species on earth, to do whatever a free will entity decides to do, they can choose to dictate and kill off one another, or allow their family members to be murdered in cold innocent blood, thus,
      which of these three (3) choices: (a) to murder, (b): allow murder, or (c): defend against being murdered, serves the better purpose of creating the human species?
      (Please don’t fail this answer!)

  22. Phil says:

    Glad to see you’re putting something concrete on the table to move things forward, Jon. Thank you for everything you’re doing. I wish you peace, freedom, and love for the upcoming year.

  23. Jeff Carmack says:

    Nobody spells it out like you, Jon. Please have your writing in other multiple locations in case this page ever goes down.

  24. Darrell says:

    “There are a few principles involved in any effort to change the direction of fascist control.”

    I agree with everything you said except that, since we’re up against communists, not fascists. The word “fascist” is thrown about all the time and very recklessly. Historically, Fascism opposed communism and was successful until the traditional enemies of Christ and of the truth and of the human race chose to crush it, and then make up all kinds of lies about it. I hope it’s OK to say here that Hitler and Nazi Germany have been lied about to an extreme and bizarre degree. My research tells me we’ve been lied to about everything of importance in history, and everything of importance today. See, e.g., “The Greatest Story Never Told”: (banned by youtube, of course).

  25. Tom says:

    Lawyers want to be paid. They want to be paid up front.
    Everybody’s poor. Surviving on pocket lint and Skittles.

    No more free cheese in the mousetrap.

    God’s away on business.

  26. peterbro says:

    I agree that the cessation of this oppressive regime that acts in the name of “saving” the people will occur in the court by people who have the standing to claim their unalienable right.

    For those of you who have seen the film “Roman J Israel Esq”, the line he utters – “we have been filing the wrong briefs in the wrong court before the wrong judge” may stand out.
    What did he mean?

    The jurisdiction in which I am domiciled (a State in Australia) will only allow a corporate sole or a corporation use the State Supreme Court under the current act.
    This is the legal jurisdiction, and people are precluded from using it unless they ‘pretend’ that they are a government created legal fiction.
    If you use an unqualified Birth Certificate then you get to play in their sandpit and by their rules.

    The reason most Constitutional arguments fail, is because people don’t qualify to be anything other than the legal fictions created by government.
    The original Constitutional domain was in the jurisdiction of equity and its derived law, whereas what passes as common law today is nothing but statutes, codes and regulations and is exclusively the legal jurisdiction.

    The legal jurisdiction is derived from the equitable jurisdiction.
    The equitable jurisdiction is where the people should be interacting, but we have all been duped to abandon the original jurisdiction where we can claim unalienable God given rights to interact in the legal jurisdiction where we have limited rights and duties given to us by the body politic that are forebears invested with the authority to deal with limited and defined duties.

    The switch over emphatically occurred when the Western world went broke in the late 1920’s and early 1930’s and lawful money was removed from general circulation and legal tender used in its stead.

    The following verifies this fact, without stating what the remedy is.
    For those who seek to claim their right to exist in the original jurisdiction, you will have to change the nature of your Birth Certificate, pay the debt assigned against your legal estate, and live in accordance with equitable values.
    You will have to do this through the structures of trusts.

    42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights | 
    Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

  27. Lawyers??? The legal profession is invited to stop lying and answer honestly that the US Constitution of 1789 is not in force and effect.
    The Banking Cartel suspended the US Constitution, first during the Civil War in 1861 under the Lieber Code, and then under a secret Constitution in 1871.

    Retired JudgeSpills the Beans American Courts are Psuedo Courts or Fictions. By: Judge Dale

  28. Kathy says:

    PHHWWEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Happy New Year!????????

  29. Roger welsh says:

    As an English man from tHe UK, it is imperative that America, US, wins out.

    Trump said about the “Swamp” and look at the level,of corruption from the judiciary, your supposed bastion of democracy, operating under the “me,” principle!

    We now have the most ghastly similarity with corrupt politicians joining in the the destruction of our democracy and our hard fought way of life.

    I am 80 and I would do almost anything to cause serious accidents to Bill Gates, faucci,and sorts, who are, in my view, psychopaths and love evil!

    I wish you strength of will through understanding you are threatend by the greedy few.

    Roger Welsh UK friend

  30. Allan Baker says:

    Thank for your courageous reporting on this issue.

    We have such an action filed in Montana.

    It can be viewed at

  31. Joyce says:

    Yes, very interesting perspective.

  32. JBW says:

    Hamilton and his lackeys opened the door to this Constitutional BS. There hasn’t been a day Congress has met since the beginning of the Fed Republic they have honored that corrupt and divisive document.

    Read the AntiFederalist paper #1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *