The SARS-Cov-2 virus was never proved to exist

If you can’t prove a virus exists, how do you create a test to detect it? How can you claim the test reveals that people are infected with the virus?

by Jon Rappoport

December 1, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

“My brother’s cousin, who works at Harvard studying snails, says OF COURSE they’ve isolated SARS-CoV-2, and they’ve sequenced its genetic structure many times…”

I have written several articles documenting the fact that the COVID virus is missing in action.

And when I say missing, I’m talking about two MAJOR confessions, from both the CDC and a group of study-authors in Europe…and in each case, these people were in the process of assembling instructions on how to perform the diagnostic PCR test for that very virus. The virus they said they didn’t have.

They didn’t have it because they couldn’t get it.

They couldn’t get it because no one had it.

In other words, the existence of the COVID virus is unproven.

Now, I want to point out three factors that produce a hypnotic effect. Even in the absence of the virus, these factors seem to indicate the virus “must exist.” I’m not talking about government or media pronouncements, which are obvious.

ONE: Scientists and public health agencies claim they’ve ISOLATED the virus.

There is no reason to believe them. The term “isolation” is thrown around like a politician throws around the term, “the people.”

Isolation of a virus SHOULD mean it is separated out from all the genetic, cellular, microbial, and waste material that surrounds it. But don’t assume, when professionals are talking or writing, that this is what they DO mean. Do not assume that.

For example, they often mean: “We have the virus in a dish in the lab. The soup in the dish contains human cells, animal cells, chemicals, toxic drugs, and other material. However, we know the virus is there and growing, because it is killing the cells…”

Wrong. There is more than sufficient non-viral toxic substance in the soup that could be doing the cell-killing. Further, the cells in the dish are being starved of nutrients. That factor alone could produce cell death. And obviously, “the virus” in the dish is surrounded by this mix of material. It is far from isolated.

TWO: The following hypnotic effect ropes in some of the brightest medical and scientific professionals, who otherwise challenge all sorts of medical dogma. It is: “The genetic sequence of the virus is well established. Many studies confirm this.”

Well, sure. If experts have mapped out the genetic structure of the virus, the virus must exist. Right?

Wrong. The sequence is INFERRED. It is ASSUMED.

Inferred from what? The genetic sequence could be cobbled together from several sources: a piece or pieces of RNA that have been arbitrarily chosen as “relevant clues”; chosen according to a bias in favor of a certain type of virus.

Bias? What does that mean? I’ll explain. When a few dozen people in Wuhan fell ill, back in 2019, there were a million ways researchers could have gone, in trying to figure out the cause.

Of course, as I’ve written, they could have looked out their windows and observed the horrific air pollution hanging over the city, and realized these “unexplained cases” of pneumonia had a ridiculously simple origin. But no.

The researchers opted, as they always do, for a “new virus.” And, they chose, without a shred of evidence, to “look for” a germ from the coronavirus family. That was the pre-planned story. That was the bias.

From that point on, the die was cast. The “genetic sequencing” involved cobbling together, by assumption and inference, a collage of INFORMATION, into code, which would satisfy the pre-ordained scenario.

They ASSEMBLED a genetic sequence that matched what they were going for: a coronavirus.

Don’t imagine genetic sequencing is performed by people looking directly at a virus through a cosmic microscope and jotting down the names of rows of genes sitting side by side like cars in a supermarket parking lot.

THREE: The other hypnotic factor is the PCR test. “If the test exists to detect the virus, the virus must exist.”

Wrong. The test—which has irreparable and fatal flaws, as I’ve documented—is working, at best, from a fragment of RNA which is ASSUMED to come from the virus. If the test appears to identify that fragment as “relevant,” the test result clams the patient is “infected.”

People believe the test must mean something. And the only thing it could mean is: it finds the virus in a person, or the virus isn’t in that person’s body. But either way, the virus is real.

Wrong.

The deck is stacked. The game is rigged. Welcome to the Deep Medical State.

As in any truly deep operation, only a small number of elite professionals understand the basic con. The rest are blind, and accepting. Some are willfully blind. They see the truth in a flash of insight, and then they shut up.

However, in this mad COVID landscape, minds and doors are opening. The hypnotic haze is receding. The truth is coming out. Doctors, scientists, reporters, and members of the public are discovering and rejecting the Big Con.

And now we move to on the first Smoking Gun:

Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February, 2020, and re-published in July.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [virus] are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very paper I’m citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and “you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated,” these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But they didn’t. “The virus” is inseparably mixed with other material. The scientists are changing the meaning of the word, “isolate.” They’re lying.

Science is not assumptions. Or lies.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

And now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world.

READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.

“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”

TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.

“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.

“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”

TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.

The study is titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.” [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]

Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare the reliability of the test.

The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen.

Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there.

The virus isn’t there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been separated out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed and its existence has not been proved.

And yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all over the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion that there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case numbers; and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed the global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.

A great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists are now talking about the “new virus” as if they understand its structure and sequence. No. They’ve INTERPRETED that genetic structure. And once they’ve made their interpretations, they gibber about what it means.

And now:

The fake coronavirus and the missing study: the secret in plain sight

NOTE: Readers have sent me electron microscope images of what are claimed to be “isolated COVID virus.” An image here, an image there—this is NOT the way science is done, as I will explain fully.

Now I want to reveal the study that should have been done, at the outset, when scientists were first claiming there was a pandemic based on the discovery of “a new virus.”

Here’s what you would do if you were an actual scientist: you would line up a minimum of 500 people who have been diagnosed with the epidemic illness. From each of them, you would extract tissue samples.

Then you would correctly and meticulously put each sample through a procedure that would result in 500 viewable electron microscope photographs—one from each patient. You would lay all these photos side by side.

You would answer three burning questions: do you see, in each and every photo, MANY particles of the same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos, that same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos, a virus you’ve never seen before?

If your answer to any of these questions is no, you go back to the drawing board. You haven’t found sufficient evidence of a new virus that is causing widespread illness.

If your answer is yes to every question, other researchers will then line up 500 new volunteers who have been diagnosed with the epidemic illness, and they will perform this same experiment, in order to confirm or deny the findings of the first team of scientists.

If they, too, answer every burning question with a yes, then a third team of researchers performs their own experiment on 500 more volunteers. And if their answer to every question is yes, then you have something. Then you have an indication, according to conventional and traditional methods, that a new disease could be on the rise.

People continue to send me an occasional electron microscope photo from a research study on “the coronavirus.” Of course, as you can see, that is not what I’m talking about at all. A single photo from here, from there—irrelevant.

If you were an honest medical researcher, would you claim the result of giving a new drug to three patients justified the approval of that drug for use on a few hundred million patients? Not a chance. The same basic principle applies here.

The study I just described, with 500 patients each time, done several times with new teams, is what the scientific method demands: large studies; clear results; and then confirmation or rejection of the initial finding, by more scientists employing the same methods and materials.

One critic, after reading my description of the proper way to do a study on the purported “new coronavirus,” said, “This wouldn’t work because it is extremely labor-intensive.” Well, guess what? The result of declaring a pandemic caused by a virus that isn’t there…and the ensuing lockdowns and economic and human destruction stemming from that declaration…is “labor-intensive” to a far greater degree.

Stopping the production engine of the world on the pretext of finding a new virus, when no new virus has been correctly found and isolated, is a crime that supersedes the sweat and effort of doing proper science.

As far as what is actually going on in labs where researchers are fiddling with genetic sequences of this and that and making vast assumptions and proclamations; don’t talk to me about science. Talk to me about liability and prison.

Final notes: At the site, fluoridefreepeel.ca, you will find a number of FOIA requests to public health agencies (see examples here and here). These requests are asking for records showing that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. The repetitive and routine reply is: “We have no records at this agency.” Taken together, they paint a picture of egregious fraud.

Mainstream scientists will make two claims: one, we have isolated the virus; and two, it is not necessary to isolate the virus, because we’ve discovered its genetic sequence. Both claims are false.

From reading the arcane language surrounding claims of having sequenced the virus, I see an apparent multi-layered scam composed of leaps of unwarranted assumptions. The researchers say they are using tools that allow them to closely approximate the structure of SARS-CoV-2, even though they don’t have the virus in hand. This is absurd.

It’s like saying: There is a new planet in the solar system. We don’t know where it is or what it looks like. We don’t know what processes are at work on this new planet. But we do know the moon is a very close approximation of the planet. Therefore, we can know everything we need to know about the new planet from our knowledge of the moon.

And a rabbit is spaceship. And there are condos for sale on Jupiter. And new element #267587, which no one has ever seen, is almost an exact copy of Philadelphia Cream Cheese.

The science is settled.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

This entry was posted in Covid and tagged .

141 comments on “The SARS-Cov-2 virus was never proved to exist

  1. ReluctantWarrior says:

    Liberty’s Dreamers

    Out of the bloody mists
    Of time
    Came the ghosts of Runnymede
    Bearing a bold dream of
    The rights of Man,
    Landing on the shores of
    A new world
    Where they celebrated
    The flight of
    The magnificent bald eagle,
    Symbol
    Of a promising new republic
    The hope of all mankind,
    Now crucified on the cross
    Of indifference
    Whose insurrection
    From an arrogant crown
    Now belongs to the ages,
    A noble remembrance
    Of that fair meadow
    Along the River Thames
    Where freedom’s legacy
    Was bequeathed
    To future generations,
    Patriots arise!
    We are
    The New Sons of Liberty,
    And on this hallowed land
    From sea to shining sea
    Her original dreamers
    Built an enlightened nation
    With a shot
    Heard round the world,
    Her legacy once proud
    Now hangs in the balance
    Eclipsed by the illusion
    Of total equality
    For have we forgotten
    That freedom
    Has no equal?
    Hark! Hark!
    A dark winter approaches
    As the burning embers
    Of freedom
    Lie smoldering
    Beneath her darkened
    Polling stations,
    Yearning to be given
    New life
    To once again ignite
    The brush fires
    Of her soul,
    As the mechanical
    Forces of ignorance
    Terrorize the land
    With their masks of fear,
    And the New Sons of liberty
    Make their gallant
    Last stand!
    What will become of her?
    Let Freedom’s Eagle
    Take flight again
    Carving gracefully through
    The headwinds of tyranny,
    After all
    Who will save us
    From our selves
    And once again
    The volatile
    Fires of freedom attend?
    As her tattered flag
    Whipped by
    The cruel winds of ignorance
    Challenges us
    To tip liberty’s tankards
    Of Mr. Hare’s porter,
    To rise up
    And her broken heart mend,
    As each day
    We begin the fight anew
    To harness
    Those darker instincts
    That have left us singing
    The star spangled blues,
    Will that proud Eagle
    Soar again?
    That story will be written
    My dear friend
    With the blood of me and you!

    • Wotan says:

      Very pertinent poem with which I was not familiar. Perhaps, I should have been.

      • ReluctantWarrior says:

        I wrote it just the other day and, of course, it is about the current constitutional crisis that we are in. It is a call to patriots to wake up and work together to save our country. Please feel free to post anywhere patriots gather.

    • R J Wilson says:

      Yes that is very good
      The way to deal with tyrants in government is to police them with the grand jury so do a search for Red Beckman
      It goes along with Sheriff Mack and the duty of the sheriff to defend your liberty

  2. Den Rhodes says:

    Jon, I keep reading in the literature (from 2009 and 2016) that mRNA vaccines do not enter the genome of the host cells.

    However I saw on

    https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/1/content/commerce/videos/life-science/transfection/transfection-101-mk.mp4

    a video on how transfection works and a slide on there says there are two ways – “transient” and “stable”
    “Transient” is temporary and “stable” is long term. Moderna are using the stable method to deliver the synthetic strand of RNA which does enter the DNA of the host cells and then self replicates.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      The only way any mRNA “vaccines” could ever work, is by injecting the mRNA into the target cells.

      – Just like the false claim that “vaccines” don’t infect you with the (claimed) pathogen. – Then, HOW are they even functional at all if they don’t? That is, if the “theory” of how these “immune-therapies” are supposed to work by titrating (“stimulating”) your immune system, then – they would need to provide the genetic signature for your body to identify, so that it could manufacture the necessary antibodies against it.

      Therefore, actually introducing the infectious pathogen (even in supposedly “killed” or “deactivated” form) STILL introduces a chemically-active RNA, a foreign substance, into your body.

      So even by “their” theories, one could easily and rationally poke serious holes in those theories, by addressing all of those contradictions! – The so-called “experts” hate it when a sane and logical-minded, non-degree’d, non-certified individual as able to reasonably question their position on “vaccinations” – rather than just take their words FOR it.

      This is also how one can pull apart so many of these pop “studies” that are routinely used by these “authorities” to justify their immoral and downright unlawful – experimental – procedures, and even mandate them – under “color of law“.

      If one can find plenty of contradictions in their OWN words and works, then THAT is usually a convincing sign that there are also other notable problems with their “theories”.

      The profit motive is the biggest give-away to virtually every scam, regardless of how well dressed-up as “science” it may appear!

      • Haniel Adhar says:

        The theory behind vaccines that are “RNA” vaccines is the same as how AZT works.

        These “COVID” vaccines, especially the Moderna one, are DNA chain synthesis inhibitors. They work in the same was that Remdesivir works, which substitutes a nucleotide in cellular mRNA, which slows down DNA synthesis but doesn’t bring it to a halt the way AZT does.

        The Oxoford and the Moderna Vaccines do not actually contain any “nCOV” virus, and the Oxford one has a GM chimp virus that produces the “spike” protein “associated” with COVID19 (SARS-Cov-2) and it is supposed to bring about a general, broad reaction of the immune system to “hopefully react against the virus”. The assumption is the virus is everywhere, so they hope that the host comes in contact with the virus so the vaccine can force a reaction.

        It is total nonsense.

        And there is no virus to boot.

        The only thing these vaccines will do is create more food allergies, allergies to commensal organisms, or autoimmune diseases that are non fatal but very expensive to manage.

        • Thank you, Mr. Adhar, for this explanation

        • Jim S Smith says:

          Except that more evidence keeps “bubbling to the surface” that those who receive these “vaccines” (like so many who religiously get their “flu shot” every year) end up having a greater chance of getting sick from the successive exposures to “flu”, “COVID”, etc. – AND – for many – increases their chances of serious complications upon exposure to the “wild forms” of pathogens to possibly include DEATH.

          No THANK YOU! – NOT the way I want to leave.

      • PEGylation.

        The mRNA snippet is hidden in a PEGxlated molecule, a polymer made of polyethylene glycol.
        PEG is also known as polyethylene oxide (PEO) or polyoxyethylene (POE), depending on its molecular weight.
        It is hydrophilic and can be manipulated to hold or release it contents upon command, and can mask any drug or vaccine or for that fact, any genetic or bio-genetic material. It can release small nano-structures.

        It seems in a massive study completed in the 90’s that at that time 70% of Americans carried antibodies for PEG.
        Now PEG is in shampoo, cosmetics, foods, your car, plastics, drinking containers, well its pretty well everywhere.

        Go ahead look on the side of a bottle of whatever; face cream or shampoo or pharmaceutical, you will find it there, ie; PEG-80, PEG-40, PEG-150
        They have hundreds of them…Macrogol is the name of one used in pharmacology. There are other names.

        Initially it was in Shampoo to stop it from freezing, because is used as an anti-freeze. It move to other uses as it evolved in the lab. It could carry micro-chemicals or moisture or preservatives in face creams and cosmetics to stop making up drying out or fading, or used in anti-aging. It could be used to bring nutrients to a specific gland.

        It was found it could cross the blood brain barrier, carrying payloads of nano-materials for neural manipulation.

        So…that being said, the Trojan horse carries the payload to your cells and because the immune system does not fight or fear (cant think of another word) it. The intruder is tolerated. The molecule can be activated by a cell phone frequency to allow the nanostructure to do its work entering your cells and by then its too late, the castle is breached and the mRNA information self replicates, like a piece of software and you are turned into an antiviral factory.

        The whole idea with this is the thing — that made Bill Gates incredibly rich; the idea is…Versions?
        Once taken it will have to be kept up, it will destroy your immunity. And will have to taken continuously.

        It is quite ingenious really, this is cutting edge tech and will be used on everything from drug delivery to an exact point, to gene therapy for cancer, and vanity.

        People will be dying of all kinds of things years later and won’t realize it was the mRNA vaccine that opened the door to this malfunction of the immune system.
        Think of it as a gene drive, as in monoculture.
        CRISPR technology is about to have its day in the sun.
        Think of children with twenty parents, or soldiers breed at birth and chosen early.

        And now the age of the gods.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      And yet,

      Nary, if any, a word from the “press” about it!

      Go figure.

    • Amanda says:

      Wow!! OMG thank you so much for posting that. I’m going to try to send my info (on the covid fraud and the Great Reset agenda) to both of them. That Dr. McCollough basically gave me an opening, in that he said “there must be another agenda beyond Democrat/Republican.”

      And I hope everyone else is writing letters or doing something to get the truth out. Though it helps you feel like you are not alone when you chat with others who are awake, we really have to find a way to expand our numbers and wake up others. I’m giving out flyers and I’m sending letters to elected officials and law enforcement (we need them on our side).

  3. Firestarter says:

    But then what about the antibody test?!?
    If they don’t even know what the virus is, how could they discover antibodies (I’m not even saying that they could if they had the virus isolated).

    Robert Kennedy Jr. rips apart the COVID-19 vaccine trials.
    The reported 90% efficacy of the vaccines is based on the supposed developing of antibodies after vaccination.
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-candidates-safety-concerns/

    More here.
    https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1673&p=69485#p69485

    • Thankful says:

      Antibody test only detects antibodies but to what specifically it does not say……just shows the body is producing them, antibodies, says an infection is or has caused the body to produce them. Look up IgM, IgG, and IgA test. These are used for many diagnostics along with other testing to get to a diagnosis…………but again, no antibody test specifically positive for Covid 19.

      • Jim S Smith says:

        And moreso.

        All a test for antibodies demonstrates is, that the body was exposed to something, not necessarily an active infection at that point in time.

        The whole “testing” regime has been an utter farce, for many years! – Just look at how the “tests” for HIV, AIDS, and whatever have you – have been based on: “antibodies”. With the detected presence of antibodies, the irresponsible “testers” and others behind them called those results as “proof” one was infected and “contagious”. That is NOT the purpose and design of antibodies tests!

        So HERE, HERE – on the scammery of much of “today’s medicine”. They have effectively murdered science, in the name of profits and political advantage!

        • Haniel Adhar says:

          Exactly. Exposure.

          AND the longest standing antibody class in the body is the class of IgG antibodies. They have a half life of up to 90 days and stay in circulation for at least 180, maybe longer.

          Plus, these antibody tests only test for IgG, and likely only IgG4, which comprises 75% of all IgG antibodies, and they ignore 1,2, and 3. IgG4 are also notoriously cross reactive, so if we are testing for antobodies against viruses in the same family (essentially the exact same protein) then of course any one of these positive antibody tests can show that the patient was exposed to at least one of the previously “discovered” coronaviruses at any point in the last year or so.

      • Uroš Mozetič says:

        absolutely so, to my knowledge there are 5 antigenes for the whole human kind. so the question is, how can this be specific for any virus? it isn’t. its all just a big fraud. we are all victims of a colossal syop warfare!

        • Jim S Smith says:

          we are all victims of a colossal syop(sic) warfare!

          You could not have said that any louder, nor any more plain than that. This all falls under the regime of “perception-management”.

    • Fenwick says:

      That first article is great – thanks for the link!

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Mr. Kennedy has been ripping apart the whole of the “vaccine propaganda” for years too. Much of his material is very solidly sound and very easy to follow.

    • These are generic COVID antibody tests, they check for Coronavirus antibodies and if you have had a cold or the flu…

      There are seven that are gene-typed and four of them, humans can get SARS 1&2, MERS and four which cause mild flu or colds.

      So…gaining antibodies is simple, and with them using some 45 cycles in CDC PCR, then finding cases is the least of their problem.

      In fact, I would say it would hard for them to find someone without antibodies.

    • jjtech says:

      There is no valid test for “viruses” as no one has ever isolated one and proven it causes disease. Antibodies are usually proteins (like p15 I believe in case of fake-hiv) and they’re meaningless. What we are being fed for centuries are assumptions and fairy tales. What means the presence of random protein in human organism? Just that – the certain protein is present in human body. End of story. It gives zero indication about disease or anything else. There are hundreds of reasons why people have certain proteins in their bodies.

    • D for Diligence says:

      The late, great David Crowe did some excellent work on this subject back in May:

      http://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf

      https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/e/the-infectious-myth-covid-19-antibody-tests/

      “David goes through his recent research on antibody tests and shows that they are as much a mess as RT-PCR testing for infection, maybe more. Important data needed to validate the meaning of antibodies is missing, it is randomly chosen from patients rather than from following one person, or it directly contradicts dogmas about how antibodies work.”

  4. george says:

    I think the question in the title is a joke. god was not proved to exist and yet was used to control sheeple for 6k years. ‘official science’ will be used for more than that.

    • teo toon says:

      A fool says in his heart. “God does not exist.”

      • Wotan says:

        Excellent reply!

      • jjtech says:

        And what is God? A guy with a white beard floating on a cloud? Infinite consciousness? There are as many definitions of “god” as people living on this planet. So his post and your response are just a lot of fluff and no substance. Like to kids arguing if superman is stronger than hulk. Make believe world is all.

    • Haniel Adhar says:

      Having such a myopic view of “god” does not prove or disprove the existence of god.

      It just means you have never had that personal experience.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Lack of proof of existence, does NOT prove a lack of existence.

      – Issac Asimov

      • jjtech says:

        Yes, sure. Just like there is no proof of existence of anything without restoring to assumptions (like existence of objective time, which was never proven). This whole world is a symphony of assumptions based in nothing.

  5. ken says:

    Words rattling around like PhD,,, Professional,,, Doctor,,, Scientist,,, Epidemiologist,,, etc.

    These are words that People use to show a expert is “educated” and know what their doing when in reality they are all put in little boxes at university. All the boxes believe what other boxes say especially when the box is preceded by the word government.

    I have run into a song that explains this better than I. “Little Boxes” Only 2.5 minutes long.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Lkx4hpDcKI&feature=emb_logo

    • Andrew McVicker says:

      Wow, ty for that. “Ticky tacky,” that’s great.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Pretty interesting that,

      I had a friend who had THREE PhD’s! – There are ways of getting a PhD on a subject – without spending the six-to-eight years in some over-priced, establishment-approved “school”.

      If I wanted (and could afford) to get awarded one or more religious or theological PhD’s, I could order the study materials and take the tests (on-line), and upon a passing score – get a PhD – in say “Divinity”, for example. – So, what was all the hoopla about having “degrees” and “titles” and such again? ? ?

      Plus,

      Just because one has a “degree” or so many “certifications” from establishment academies, does NOT guarantee they really know anything solid, let alone are honest in their “research” methods. Renowned “Titles” do not make a man beyond reproach, and invincible to the human tendencies that are with the rest of us.

      In other words, they still aren’t gods.

      • Michael says:

        Years ago I interviewed Doctor Robert Martin in Pasadena California. He had 4 Phds. My favorite quote by him was…”All a PhD proves is that someone knows more, and, more about less, and, less.

        • Jim S Smith says:

          Hah-hah-hah!

          Good one.

          – “The more we learn, the more we know less about anything.”

          That’s the conundrum of the Universe: The more answers we find, the more questions we end up with. – That’s the beauty of Life and learning – a constant journey, without end.

      • Haniel Adhar says:

        I think what I am going to do is toss out all of my degrees and certifications in this subject matter, and start watching Youtube videos on how to do car repair, then I am going to go on mechanic pages on the internet and start telling every mechanic that either went to school for this or worked in a garage for more than 10 years and tell them exactly what they should do with how to service Ford F-150s.

        Because experience, education, and qualifications mean nothing. They only thing that matters is that I have a google and a youtibe, so that makes me an expert.

        I charge $150 an hour to fix cars now.

      • jjtech says:

        Correct…. All degrees, authority figures, education – all just a huge scam for the naive to believe their little fairy tales. Also, you can easily BUY an expert and instruct him what to “prove” in his “studies”. This is exactly what’s going on here – figureheads and “educated” morons dictating people how to live, what to believe. It’s a kindergarden level situation. Where blind lead the blind, followers follow, etc.

  6. cool d says:

    How do you diagnose for a fake virus?
    You use a fake test.

    So then how do you fight the fake virus?
    You must use a fake vaccine, of course.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Not to mention the role of the controlled-“press” in keeping the momentum of fear and paranoia going.

      Every major scam, usually, has many participants, and lots of money flowing.

    • Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

      Haha. Good one.

      How do you fake the vaccine?
      You conflate historical fake vaccines (inert parts of fake viruses that supposedly alert the human immune system) with a nano-tech-5G-readable-lifeform-chip-thing-vaccine-injectable that must be preserved at -90 F and transported from Germany on United Airlines.

      How do you fake a nano-tech-5G-readable-lifeform-chip-thing-vaccine-injectable that must be preserved at -90 F?
      That ain’t fake, bro. That’s what they’re gonna pump into yer veins… a new lifeform nano-worm that cuts off yer pineal God-gene-connector which will zombifie you or make you into a “carbon unit” as on StarTrek… subject to directions or destruction at the push of a 5G button at Dr. No Bill Gates… headquarters.

      Recall the Redneck comedy guy? If you’re puttin’ extra tires in the back of yer station wagon along side yer 12 gauge, just in case ya blow TWO tires and not one, you JIS MAT BE… a redneck. Jeff Foxworthy, anyone?

      For today… If you find that yer fearin an invisible virus and lookin’ to be tested with a swab up into yer brain jis to find out if yer sick er not, and if yer plannin’ to git a needle shot into yer arm full o’ gunk that you kaint pronouce, you jis mat be… a fool.

      If yer one of them ones that are trackin relatives and friends to see who came within six feet of one another to find out who mat be conajus…. and if you enjoy gittin paid fer it, you jis mat be… a traitor.

      Imaginary LOLs from my readers… thank you.

    • ZiiNon says:

      Medical coding guidelines for the SARS-covid-19 state, “no positive serology needed”. Doctor documentation is suffice.
      Meaning, you present with symptoms and the doctor doesn’t have to even test to be diagnosed, just his writing that is, makes it so.
      These coding guidelines came out in March and haven’t changed.

    • Robert C says:

      Excellent analogy and truth!

    • jjtech says:

      Yes sir. You have fake virus, fake experts, fake tests, fake “case” numbers, fake death stats, fake diagnoses…. everything is fake like Adibas trainers.

  7. Nothere says:

    Leprechauns from Le Prosy they be

  8. From Elsewhere says:

    So many insiders still silent. Any dictatorship before had traitors, spies, heroes fighting the overwhelming power. Where are they now, to join you? I had hoped this lie had a short life…

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Control of information.

      They are out there, but the controlled-press and the big tech-media are keeping a lid on all of it.

    • jjtech says:

      I think over 600 doctors in Germany came out to call fake a fake. Not a beep by the media. 4 million people protesting in Berlin, the “media” reports 40 thousand…. etc, etc. The lie had no real life at all, what has a long shell life is the BELIEF in lies. It’s all an illusion, a veil of Maya…..

  9. Michael says:

    I tried to answer a question someone asked about COVID deniers and what was the reason. I answered based on what I learned from Jon’s many posts and even quoted CDCs website. Here is a response I received:
    I’m going to assume you have first-hand knowledge that many (more than 11) And seeing as how you are making the assumption that most people don’t look beyond what they are told… I don’t even know why I’m bothering to respond to you you are a waste of f****** carbon. You’re entire life is an absolute waste. I don’t know why you chose to be who you are today. I’m sorry you got some bad DNA. There is no ad hominem in a text There is simply people being stupid. And you are definitely one of those people and there’s nothing I can say to change your mind or make you more intelligent so I don’t even know why I’m bothering to take my time to respond to you to have a good day. I wish all of the science deniers would just f****** kill themselves. Like seriously.

    • bob klinck says:

      The author of this diatribe is obviously one of the simpletons who promote the proposition that “science” can be “settled”–“at the point at which it meets my ideological requirements”, of course.

    • Arthur Danu says:

      When you get comments like this, you know you are walking on a path that leads to the truth. Attacking a PERSON is very easy compared to presenting logical evidence in support of a position.

      It is very hard to endure sometimes, but I’ve been seeing this behavior since 9/11, with a whole host of issues regarding attacks on humanity and freedom, such as chemtrails, GMOs, vaccines, the federal income tax, and of course, the PHONY WAR ON TERROR itself (which all of sudden, seems to have disappeared with the scam of COVID-19 taking its place.)

      Just live your truth. Truth is not established by MAJORITY. It is a SINGULARITY, like seed, that bears its own, good and healthy fruit over time.

      • From Elsewhere says:

        The 9/11 is a moment in time when I also see a shift in politics and general conduct, downhill for liberties and civil rights. For ages, there was always some rogue general, some rebel, some resistance. Now, since 2001, none visible, no leader of the fight against these people…

    • Andrew McVicker says:

      Lol, we’re just “science deniers” because we have doubts about unproven claims. Never mind facts such as the definition change of pandemics back in 2009 after the swine fail. This person’s response just adds to the assertion that many people want this fake pandemic to be real. Are their lives so empty? My God.

    • Larry C says:

      Michael, never waste your time arguing with a
      Religious Fanatic…aka True Believer.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      I get this all the time, so you are definitely NOT alone on this subject.

      I have cast aside (or have been cast aside by) many “friends” this year because of the level of stupidity, hype, fear, paranoia that I REFUSE to live by.

      Even told a few friends that, “I refuse to live my life in fear all the time.” – Just because of THIS harmless statement of fact (about myself) – I was written off, and even in a few cases, threatened with physical violence by them – for refusing to “go along with”.

    • Haniel Adhar says:

      If this person has an issue with “science deniers”, then why was there no actual science in this statement?

      • Jim S Smith says:

        Funny how the labeled “science-deniers” seem to offer up more evidence to back up their observations of the contrary, than the so-called “scientists” who like to argue offer up to back up their statements?

        Hell,

        Many of them even rely upon the fawning of the so-called debunkers and “fact-checkers” who themselves seem to have very little grasp of the subject they are defending.

        “Echo-parrots” – virtually ALL of them.

  10. Tubby says:

    Implying that the world is just chock full of scientists who turn away from the truth is ignoble and unjust. A lie. A fantasy. Yes, there are flaws in the science- it is new, difficult, requires special techniques and errors are made but that is the nature of science and in the end, the truth will out and show that the general direction and efforts put into this are correct and justified.

    The genome has indeed been sequenced, even if some people can’t access or accept it. See here- https://theconversation.com/i-study-viruses-how-our-team-isolated-the-new-coronavirus-to-fight-the-global-pandemic-133675 ,,, for instance.

    There is no giant conspiracy behind any of this- just a lot of hard-working people who deal best they can with an enemy that is elusive, changeable, possibly rapidly evolving and dangerous. The science behind this is solid but complex and incomplete and yes, questions remain. So? That is always the way. Nailing the science down on this is difficult but will be done.

    Have a little faith in the good, dump fear of the unknown and wild thoughts of evil cabals. They are figments.

    • glenn says:

      I don’t think it says that scientists are turning away from the truth. This is just a common flaw in science of doing whatever it takes to reproduce the results they want. At no point in this research is there ever a consideration that there may not be a novel virus.

      The overuse of technology and chemicals to find a virus and induce infection misses the major point of how can these unnatural experiments be applied to a real organism. Why are they creating abnormal conditions and sickness to prove viral infection? The whole point of all this research was to prove that viruses are the catalyst of the disease and not caused by an illness itself.

    • Arthur Danu says:

      Tubby, the SOLID SCIENCE behind COVID-19 says that 99% of the people who “catch it” DON’T DIE.

      Why is the world getting all crazy about such a BENIGN case of nothing more than a mild flu?

      I look forward to your response after you’ve finished your latest glass of KOOL-AID!

      • Jim S Smith says:

        I believe the CDC had a data table that stated barely 0.5 % mortality for COVID-19 (yes, that’s HALF of one percent).

    • Larry C says:

      FYI, Tubby, the late Kary Mullis – Nobel Prize recipient and chemist – also invented the PCR Test…the Gold Standard for testing whether one is positive for COVID-19.

      Before he died, Mr. Mullis stated flatly that his PCR Test was WORTHLESS FOR TESTING FOR THE COVID-19 VIRUS. (The problem lies with something called ‘sequencing’.) And yet, Mullis’s test is being used worldwide to scare the Hell out of each and every one of us, claiming millions of False Positives…and Hey, We’re Just Getting Warmed Up!!!

      So who do we believe: The guy who INVENTED THE TEST…or Mainstream Media?

      The answer should be obvious…

    • J C says:

      Please elaborate on ” The science behind this is solid but complex and incomplete and yes, questions remain.”
      Please tell me what exactly is incomplete and what exactly are the questions that remain -unanswered?
      Also I wonder if you happen to know of any differences between an exosome and the spherical looking images we see everywhere in the media ; which have been dubbed “coronavirus” or simply , a “virus” ,in general.?
      1) are these different entities
      2)do they look identical under the same magnification?
      3)in terms of what the functions of each are -ie.- it does this; does the other one do “this ” also?

      Thanks, it’s good to know so much we see and here is just so much conspiracy theory , rather than real verifiable facts. I thought I was imagining censorship on multiple levels .

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Have a little faith in the good, dump fear of the unknown and wild thoughts of evil cabals. They are figments.

      Good little sheople always do what they are told, without question, because all of those “scientists” know what’s best.

      I guess you don’t spend any time reading what is being talked about at the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, or anything about the DAVOS summits, or the ASPEN conference (what gets leaked out, anyway).

      So,

      Ya can go ahead and keep living the Pollyanna Fantasy skit if you so please. However, there are other scientists, that is REAL Scientists who have been trying to get their findings out in the open – but whose message is getting quashed, squashed, and in every manner and form silenced from the public sphere of knowledge.

      REAL Science does not fear debate nor cross-examination of what was previously held as “true”, when new evidence comes to light. When you have a process and a system of oppression of alternative information that calls into question what is currently being proscribed out to the public, THEN is when we have a problem of whether TRUE science is at work, or just more of the good ‘ol politics masquerading as “science”.

      Perhaps you are completely oblivious to the GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION? http://gbdeclaration.org

      Funny thing is,

      The “Declaration” was spearheaded by, you guessed it – SCIENTISTS! YET, the “media” and “social-networks” are silent about its existence, AND – even purge any mention of it or even links to it on their platforms! – What are “they” afraid of? – The blocking out and censorship of alternative viewpoints – from other scientists no less, as about as “scientific” as saying the tooth fairy is really a dentist!

      Go back to sleep, and dream up that “perfect world” you so envision as only possible, by believing the words and dictats of our overlords! TWIT!

      • oranje says:

        What the point of the Barrington Declaration?

        They take for granted the reality of this supposed new ‘virus’ and only talk about better
        ways of dealing with it.

        • Jim S Smith says:

          In case you missed it:

          It is about the “regime” that has been put in place to supposedly counter-act the “menace”, but that said “regime” is actually causing far more health-related problems (as well as the drastic economic problems) than it is actually solving.

          I would still give them some credit for at least trying to bring some commonsense to the political decision-making.

          Yeah,

          I also noticed that they still chime in that COVID-19 is deadlier to seniors than the flu (which I highly doubt), whereas they say that COVID-19 is less lethal to younger folks than the seasonal flu. – Yes, they could stand to have a little more of a reality check on this “non-pandemic”, but one thing at a time.

          I try to not make more enemies than is necessary – especially when we are ALL being pushed to the pit of destruction. So even a little bit of positive direction towards solving the problem, is far better than ANY of the establishment-loving, @ZZ-kissing control-freaks have offered humanity – with THEIR “solutions”.

          • oranje says:

            Yes essentially I agree. It shows that
            whatever is being done in the name of
            public health is not open to any debate
            and is purely political. I guess it is
            too much to expect many medics to start
            questioning the whole paradigm.

          • Paul says:

            “…have offered humanity – with THEIR “solutions”.”

            Hmmm…
            “vaccines”..
            clever.
            But again,
            they will fail, & THAT, WILL be final.

      • Madness says:

        It’s like a controlled opposition, I knew about it and stopped reading it quite at the beginning, here:

        “..Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, ..”

        That’s almost their start.
        As long as the covid tale lives we have no chance to change a thing, survive. They can and surely will come up with a dire new wave / mutation what will be basically poisoning, the vax and / or else.

        The Great Barrington is a dead-end.

    • Low Voltage says:

      For true isolation, viruses must be run through either centrifugation or filtration.

      It says right in your article that they didn’t isolate the virus prior to genetic sequencing. “Researchers confirm the source of infection by extracting genetic material from the virus IN CULTURE and sequencing its genome.”

      “Isolating a virus requires collecting specimens from patients” Since COVID has no distinguishing characteristics, how did they know these patients had COVID? Did some doctor visually diagnose them?

      Please correct my misunderstandings in your best pompous and condescending style.

    • Post Hoc says:

      Tubby,

      This article is complete hogwash and defies the logic put forward so generously and eloquently by this site.

      Maybe you should do some homework and prove to yourself that you are following the false narrative of a wandering virus which has been footloose for nearly a year now.

      Laughable.

      If you had any sense you would see that this Big Lie is designed to frighten people just like you who believe every word and who try to spread the lie even further.

      There is no pandemic of a Coronavirus, but something much worse,that means to cause lasting harm upon us if we succumb to its devious controlling intent.

    • bob klinck says:

      Tubby says “There is no giant conspiracy behind any of this–just a lot of hard-working people who deal best they can with an enemy that is elusive.” He should say “just a lot of people who have salaries and want to keep them.” Surprisingly, “The love of money is the root of all evil” has proven to be the truest saying ever uttered. The fear of deprivation of money income is the flail that drives what happens in our disinherited society, down to the finest detail. Faced with this threat, the incorruptibles are revealed to be few and far between, and in this so-called COVID crisis many of these have been cruelly punished, as the French say, pour encourager les autres.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      @ Tubby:

      Hey idiot,

      https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/01/the-sars-cov-2-virus-was-never-proved-to-exist/#comment-158565

      But here is a more “main-stream” article on the subject of PCR problems (IE: “They are totally unreliable!”) :

      https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

      Now do YOUR own homework for once, and stop being a troll.

      Your future and the future of humanity are not worth whatever you may be getting paid to do this nonsense.

      Just because you think you are doing good and well by whatever “pay-masters” have you on speed-dial are thinking, does NOT mean that you will be spared the repercussions that are being planned for the rest of us.

      Time to wake up and smell the reality!

  11. t says:

    ,, And try this article as well. It looks as if the author of the title article on this page could have made the referenced Youtube video

    https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633R

    • Jim S Smith says:

      In which the YouTube video is no longer available as of: 2020-12-01 18:35 (MST). Hmmm!

      On page 39, the document outlines how the “analytical sensitivity” of the PCR assays were determined.

      * Which unfortunately, by the test’s own inventor, makes the PCR test easily corrupted BECAUSE of that hyper-sensitivity, and thus unreliable and unstable for clinical diagnostic purposes.

      “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2)”, it reads.

      * While still admitting they do NOT have the actual virus samples. So HOW do these “characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA” even begin to compare with what is so far unknown about the actual virus’s genetic composition? Here, we are dealing with “apples and oranges”.

      De Silva said that the document is describing what was used to determine the lowest amount of viral genetic material the RT-PCR assay could detect.

      “They describe a very common process during assay set up, where the limit of detection of the RT-PCR assay was determined”, he said.

      * And this is yet more of: “putting the cart before the horse” – because they do NOT have a viable sample of the actual virus to “set up the PCR assays”?

      In this case, the CDC have used ‘transcribed’ RNA as the positive control – which means they used synthetically produced genetic material identical to that carried by the virus.

      * AH-HAH! So we’re admitting to using a “transcribed” (IE: manufactured replica) RNA – which may or may not reflect the actual virus genome (even though they CLAIM it is the same as the actual virus genome) – to use as the basis for testing for the presence of a virus that is still yet unknown? – Since WHEN is THIS proper scientific method? ? ?

      “To calculate the limit of detection of an RT-PCR assay, you need to have a known quantity of virus to extract genetic material (RNA) from, or alternatively a known quantity of RNA identical to that carried by the virus ”, de Silva said.

      * But yet, they still don’t have the actual virus to compare with their “transcribed RNA” copy to properly calibrate their testing process! So HOW can they even know if their PCR test is properly calibrated to detect and measure the actual virus?

      According to de Silva, one reason for using transcribed RNA would have been that at the time of set up, not many standardised and quantified viral stocks would have been available to extract viral RNA from.

      * More of the same: Trying find an “unknown”, by using an “unknown” for a control. – Good lord these folks have lost it! This is is about as far removed from proper science as it gets.

      De Silva maintains that using transcribed RNA rather than RNA extracted from quantified viral stocks is no reason to question the existence of SARS-CoV-2.

      “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said.

      * Really? ! ? ! – And we still call that science? Real science is not afraid to question anything and everything, especially if we can not guarantee that our “transcribed RNA” is truly the same as the actual virus RNA (which we still don’t know about yet)! – As to the second paragraph: There may be hundreds of stocks of “cultured” specimens, but how can we be sure that they were not also sloppily collected, collated, and assayed the way THIS evaluation and set up were done? ? ? Plus, there would have to be at least many tens of THOUSANDS of different genetic variations of the SARS-COV type viruses in existence – especially if these viruses are so highly adaptable and mutagenic! Good luck with getting a good sample of all of those, especially with such sloppy laboratory practices as has become commonplace today already.

      VERDICT

      False. While the document is authentic, the scientific process described within it has been misrepresented.

      This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts . . .

      * As expected. The scientific process that was used, was obviously very sloppy, inefficient, and would definitely lead to very dubious, if not outright worthless “results”.

      * *

      – “It doesn’t take a hundred scientists to prove me wrong. Just one fact.

      – Albert Einstein

  12. bob klinck says:

    In recent decades the meaning of many words has been perverted by those who work to subvert society. You point out that, in order to promote the COVID scam, the meaning of “isolated” has been fatally changed. “Mandatory” is another word that is being ruined. We are often told that taking the new vaccines will not be mandatory, but if you don’t take one, then your life will be drastically circumscribed. This is punishment, but “not mandatory” means, in the old sense of the words, that you will not suffer any secondary disadvantage if you opt out. As usual, everything that happens is seen as an opportunity to advance the dialectics of cognitive dissonance and thereby disable people’s ability to reason.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      A very succinct statement, yet one that many STILL can not wrap their minds around.

    • HR says:

      And to take this a bit further- attempting to see the bigger picture:

      Around 1905 (Jacob v. Massachusetts) the US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines could be mandatory if addressing a pandemic virus, basically. However, this mandate could only be implemented by state legislatures. No federal mandate allowed here. With one exception- in cases of bio warfare…. federal mandates of vaccines could be implemented and enforced. Let’s see if the Gates regime introduce a bio warfare story this winter.

      • Jim S Smith says:

        But that STILL goes totally against the Constitutionally-limited powers of government, as per 9th and 10th Amendments!

        That SCOTUS ruling of 1905 is just another example of judicial law-making, where the Constitution was paid “lip-service” but not adhered to.

        Plus,

        Forced vaccinations (especially of untested and unproven nature, and where their safety and efficacy is in serious doubt) are a complete violation of virtually every human-rights treaties and the Nuremburg Code – as in relation to “experimental medical procedures”. “Vaccination” is still largely a great experiment, because there is lack of solid, scientifically-sound evidence (and we’re NOT talking about any “consensus” – as “consensus” is not proof), and there is plentiful evidence that “vaccines” are not as effective as claimed, and have many serious adverse health effects — that are being conveniently IGNORED.

        Eventually,

        It is going to take “The Law of Tooth-and-Claw” approach to push back against this nightmare. Question is, who has the courage to take such a stand when the dreaded “knock at the door in the dark of night” approaches them? ? ?

  13. season says:

    I don’t understand why they say they have no isolates available. We are warned about these viruses spreading so surely labs can do a better job preventing a viral isolate from being destroyed. Also I never knew this virus was found in pieces. Why was it not found in a complete state? Did it break itself or did degrade naturally in the body? If the virus cannot remain stable in the body, how can it survive outside when released into the air? Or does a virus work in separate parts?

    • Jim S Smith says:

      If all they have are some questionable “pieces” or fragments,

      Then they DON’T have a virus.

    • Madness says:

      Because they are still unable to isolate viruses and watch the process of ‘multiplying. The only way to see them is electron-microscope but everything is dead under it, no real time process to learn, they are just guessing things. Read: Dr Stefan Lanka, Dr Tomas Cowan or watch Dr Andrew Kaufman.

      • Larry C says:

        The Comons Project is absolutely AMAZING!

        These guys must be *geniuses* in order to roll out all these programs in such short order!!!

        //heavy sarcasm//

        • Jim S Smith says:

          ** SARCASM NOTED **

          Not sure how long you have been watching things like this (over the years anyway), but yes – things of such nature do “appear” like they are “out of the blue”. This is very deliberate, and also demonstrates quite well who compliant the “media” have been in keeping hush about it all.

          I can barely recall (my memory is getting very foggy these days) talk of this nature being something out of about thirty or more years ago. You had to do a lot of digging (before the corruption of the institution of the “search engine”) to find out what some of the world’s wealthiest were talking about.

          I am also willing to bet that most have never heard of the “Johannesburg Summit 2001/2” website that used to exist years ago. I once upon a time had a solid archive of much its contents. – I vaguely remember something about health and population being mentioned a lot in several of their planning for the upcoming “COPS” (not the police, mind you) talks. (The “COPS” talks, or conferences were having to do with “climate change” and “Carbon pollution”).

          If one were to back further in time, as in – the beginnings of all those “biological research programs” at the close of WW II, you could see that “vaccination theories” were already being proposed for the entire world’s human population.

          Mohandas Gandhi came out strongly against vaccinations, and rightfully viewed them as “barbaric”.

          There is a huge amount of history on the misfortunes suffered by the many, who were “jabbed” in whatever “inoculation program” was in effect at that time.

          This “problem” is not going away any time soon, until we remove the immense profitability of “commercialized medicine”, and return it to the proper role of actually healing people.

          It used to be that in Chinese medicine (well before the full industrialization of “medicine” there), a family would pay their health practitioner a monthly fee to keep the family healthy. If someone in the family got sick, the “doctor” did not get paid, until the ailing family member was well again!

  14. Shamal says:

    Brazil’s President Bolsonaro: I ‘Won’t Take’ COVID Vaccine, Congress Won’t Make it Mandatory. ‘Forcing people to take the vaccine or say that who doesn’t take it cannot get a passport, have a public job, that’s dictatorship’, the Brazilian president said. “Whoever defends that is a dictator, or a false dictator that is willing to do business with the lives of others.” Bolsonaro also criticized the use of masks to combat the spread of the virus, referring to them as a “taboo” that needs “to fall.”Seems like me and my family will head to FREEDOM in Brazil.

    • Jim S Smith says:

      And the reason why the “media” hates Mr. Bolsonaro, and other “dissident” voices around the world.

      There seems to also be a lot of outrage about this “COVID-19” BS-ery in Hungary too.

      Look at all the money being floated around to indoctrinate and program the People into wearing their face masks everywhere, all the time! More and more of our own buses are sporting the billboarding of: “Idahoans wear masks all the time.” – Another example of a “conflation” at work here, folks.

      NOT all Idahoans wear face masks (normally) “all the time”! ! ! – So sick to death of all this propaganda, and woe unto all those who unquestioningly “follow orders”. Their woes will be greatly multiplied come the later, “sicker” part of the winter months. – Already seeing the big hype-up, more than the usual, for, “Everyone get your flu shot(s)“.

      Many areas on the continent of Africa loathe Bill Gates, Jr. and all of those “NGO’s”, who have been pushing vaccinations for everything and everyone there. – They ought to be, as to how many of their children have suffered miserably, at the hands of these “doctors without borders”, and their well-financed “big-pharma” campaigns.

      • Amanda says:

        Yup, it’s clear why the fake media hates Bolsonaro. He also seems to be aware that it’s a hoax. Check this out:

        https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/fraud/

        Scroll down and you will see an empty hospital and empty coffins in Brazil that Bolsonaro investigated.

        ‘The people will soon see that they were tricked by these governors and by most of the media when it comes to the coronavirus.’

        Jair Bolsonaro, President of brazil

        • Jim S Smith says:

          The other big name I could not remember yesterday: Victor Orban, of Hungary. He is also “well-hated” by the establishment (and its “parrots”).

          • Madness says:

            I am sorry but I think your hope in connection with Hungary has no base. I read Hungarian news sometimes and have Hungarian friends. They follow the agenda so far. However 3-4 days ago there was an interesting article on a far-right / nationalist website they published but stated that that was not the opinion of the news site editors. That article was very detailed about the hoax.
            If someone speaks the language, this was the one:

            https://kuruc.info/r/7/221176/

            Anyway, the projected population of Hungary by 2025 is 9,4 millions if I recall it well, now it’s about 10 millions. While the UK projected population is 14 millions from 66!
            That will be the biggest genocide if people can’t stop the cabal.

    • Madness says:

      My thoughts, too. Or to Sweden.

  15. Dr. E. Black says:

    Here is a new test method for the SARS-Cov-2 virus.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i1FwFCKd3k

  16. Loreto says:

    Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition.

    https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

  17. Bubba says:

    “We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus.”

    Attention! Must reiterate each time that there has never been ANY virus proved to exist since the fraudster Pasteur!
    Strike that “older coronavirus” phrase; clarify that those viruses don’t exist either!
    Otherwise, the weak-minded are left with the impression that there is something to look for!

  18. Jack Newman says:

    I’m with you on the fake virus. But what do we tell our family members about the hospital videos and nurse interviews? They see those videos on the morning shows and nightly news and get scared. Are those videos stock footage? Are the nurses actors?

    • Haniel Adhar says:

      That’s called “bad medicine”

    • Amanda says:

      Tell them that the corporate media is propaganda and that the CIA controls our media. Tell them to turn off the MSM.
      The doctors and nurses on the MSM probably work for the CIA.

    • Kia Kaha says:

      It’s been a case of intentional misdirection, misinformation, misperception and confusion. Rona is something and it’s lethal. No vaccine or mask is necessary to cure or prevent it. The source is something else. We need oxygen! Blood cells are stacking and not carrying oxygen as they typically do, we also need to exhale CO2 and not re-inhale it. Trees need our CO2, but we don’t.

      I spent the better part of the day looking at several websites. You’ll find your answers, sharable. 5G was rolled out simultaneously with the “spread of Rona coincidentally.” Our bodies can’t handle the radiation so we need to reduce exposure. If you go to yesterday’s article, you’ll see my post with more links to more websites.

      Is The “Coronavirus” Actually Radiation Sickness?
      http://radiationdangers.com/5g/is-the-coronavirus-actually-microwave-illness/

      • Jim S Smith says:

        The 5G problem is not so much as 5G, by itself.

        “5G” is in ADDITION to all the other sources of electromagnetic RF radiation that is already prevalent in our environment. We still have all the 4G towers around us to consider. The 4G tower arrays emit a far greater power output level of RF radiation, which already create the weakening of our immune defenses.

        The “5G” component could likened to: “the straw that breaks the camel’s back”.

        Plus,

        We still have the effects of all those “smart appliances” (to include your “smart-meters” at the power junctions), as well as only God knows what other RF transmitters are around us.

        We still also have the presence of electromagnetics radiating from our 60-Hertz commercial power lines, and whatever other signals may be transmitted through them too.

        So,

        Our (urban) environments are quite literally awash in all sorts of environmental, electromagnetic “pollution”, 24-7!

        None of this helps any of us, because we already contain lots of ionic Iron (IE: Hemoglobin of our blood), as well as other necessary metallic (mineral) ions – in which our bodies operate and depend on. Plus, what about the fact that our bodies operate using bio-electric energy? – Don’t they also operate on a range of frequencies, based on the operating state of our bodies?

        “5G” is just one more assault on our being, and it IS deliberate.

      • Madness says:

        It is. They use flu and cold, those are the ‘mild’ covid cases mainly. But the blood related, blood clotting ones, the organ damage ones, the long-covid ones are due to radiation. They use covid to cover the harm.
        It works together with metals in the body, like flu vax’ adjuvants.

        https://www.globalresearch.ca/more-doctors-truth-speak-out-madrid-dismantling-false-pandemic-covid-19/5719993

    • Post Hoc says:

      Jack,

      I would say that the controlled media would do everything it could to scare you with fearsome images: of nurses dressed up in hazmat suits, of seriously harrowing images of ICU patients after a highway accident, of actors reading a script..nothing to do with any fake Covid case..

      The MSM shills have been instructed to flood the media to keep the message alive..that is, to scare you to hell so that you will roll over and beg for a vaccination.

  19. Jim S Smith says:

    Hey folks!

    Might as well use “News Guard’s” own website as a directory for the sheer number of “alt-media” sites they rail against.

    https://www.newsguardtech.com/coronavirus-misinformation-tracking-center/

    Loads and loads of URL’s to many alt-media sites from around the world. :rofl:

    Now talk about using the enemy’s tools against them! 😉

    ** ROTF-LOL-TMGH! **

    Have fun, boys and girls! ( And YES, Jon’s eloquent site here, is also listed there. )

  20. Crusty Curmudgeon says:

    Jon,
    You are citing in your article a document published in February and July that fails to admit the virus is isolated.

    It seems to me that you need to address this statement, dated October 27th, on the CDC website: “SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.”

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html

    • Low Voltage says:

      Even I can see problems with their method, assuming their procedure followed the time sequence laid out in https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

      They mapped out the genetic sequence before they isolated the virus through centrifugation. It was still part of the viral culture containing “fetal bovine serum” among other things.

      They also “quantified them by using a quantitative PCR” which the inventor, Kary Mullis, called an oxymoron.

      Maybe their article is just sloppy, but it shouldn’t be if this is the proof they’re using to shut down the entire world.

    • t says:

      Right you are but you might be shut down if you continue with ‘dissent’.

    • Madness says:

      Wrong, it points back the old document about isolation where you can find the details about the actual FLAWED isolation. Check, the first link on the page.

  21. Paulo says:

    The scam has been confirmed: PCR does not detect SARS-CoV-2

    https://tinyurl.com/y3ndcvpd

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Thanks!

      Done downloaded. Never know if archive.org is going to be pressured next to “scrub” its histories clean too!

  22. Man, you made me laugh.

    I made a translation into something that is supposed to exist as a state, although that is not really the case: German.

    Lies everywhere.

    Here: https://coronistan.blogspot.com/2020/12/die-existenz-des-sars-cov-2-viru-wurde.html

  23. My gut has been telling me now for some time – we are living in an alternate universe, a twilight zone. How so – how do you explain mass hysteria where logic and reason no longer exist?
    Are we governed by humans? Don’t laugh! If your ‘scientific presuppositions’ prevent you from reading this thread –
    https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2020/11/are-we-governed-by-humans.html?m=0 – maybe your ‘science’ is the same as DaFear Mongers.
    Presuppositional failure – the greatest contributor to failure in scientific research!

    • Jim S Smith says:

      Only problem I have with the blog:

      Too many bright, distracting font colors used. It detracts from the importance of the message, and makes the blog look hokey and “cartoon-ish”. (Perhaps a bit of it is because of “BlogSpot” too?)

      Anyway,

      Seems to me some comedy relief is very much needed, especially of the “Carlin-esque” approach!

  24. Mark Stoval says:

    I am wondering if there has ever been a virus that was really isolated and then proven to be the cause of a particular disease.

    I figure some virus/disease combo has met all of the requirements but I just don’t know of one.

    Anyone care to help me out on this?

    • Tubby says:

      Polio?? or,,, ”more than 6,000 virus species have been described in detail of the millions of types of viruses in the environment”
      Just a thought.

      • Mark Stoval says:

        Polio? Surly you jest. Polio was brought under control due to vastly improved sanitation in the US. The actual vaccine may even give people polio.

        As to 6,000 virus species — I ask for a virus proven to exist and proven to cause a particular disease. A “virus/disease combo” I called it.

    • Madness says:

      Yes I can. There was not. The only properly isolated virus was a giant sea virus living in symbiosis with an algae. Dr Stefan Lanka isolated it and got Nobel for it. The same Dr Lanka who was the first whistleblower of the medical fraud about viruses.
      Read his works, well worth it.
      He was the man who won on the German High Court that measles virus doesn’t exist. 🙂 Official.

      • Tubby says:

        Wrong, wrong, wrong. Read this-
        ‘But the article makes a number of misinformed claims. The first is that the courts ruled Lanka had won the bet. According to independent pharmaceutical journal DAZonline, the higher regional court judges in Stuttgart, where Lanka filed his appeal in 2016, did not doubt the existence of the virus.
        The judges said their decision was purely a legal judgement and did not make any statement on the existence or nonexistence of the measles virus.’

        But they did say Lanka’s challenge was neither a bet nor a competition but an award. And only the promoter of the award, Lanka, could determine the rules and decide if its criteria had been met.’

      • Mike Ellwood says:

        I don’t think Stefan Lanka got a Nobel Prize for that (or for anything, so far, so far as I know).

        You are not confusing him with Kary Mullis by any chance? (who got a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test:

        https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/facts/

        )

  25. JS Hagen says:

    https://jcm.asm.org/content/58/8/e01068-20

    D-in-Law provided me with this link among several others claiming to have isolated Covid from PCR swabs in Korea and Taiwan

    Comments please?

  26. Rose Fox says:

    FYI:
    The CDC has extensively edited their paper since it was first linked in this blog. It NO LONGER contains the quoted sentence about CDC not having an “available” sample of covid.

    The sentence quoted in the blog article is on Page 42 and it now reads: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use ****at the time the test was developed and this study conducted****, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2)[…]”
    (Emphasis *** mine)

    It seems that CDC caught wind of this article and numerous other accusations that they didn’t have a sample of the covid virus, so they edited the paper that people were using to prove it. It’s important NOT to use the link to this CDC paper when proving that no sample of the covid virus exists in any lab.

    I suspect that it’s still true that CDC doesn’t have a virus sample, they are just covering their tracks to prevent people from proving it.

  27. andrey says:

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome
    gi|1798174254|ref|NC_045512.2|

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/sviewer/?id=NC_045512

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *