“No need to isolate the new virus, we have its genetic sequence”: Really?

“Isolate” means: “There it is, we see DIRECT evidence of it, it’s not attached to anything else, it’s not possibly hidden in a glob of cellular material, it’s not just a piece of some decaying old virus, it’s not a random chunk of DNA or RNA, it’s not a Maybe floating in a soup of cells in a dish, it’s not an assumption based on what we’re predisposed to find…”

by Jon Rappoport

August 25, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

The headline of this article is a typical defense offered to “prove” researchers actually discovered a new pandemic virus, SARS-CoV-2.

It’s laughable.

They have the genetic sequence of the virus? Well, where did they get it? From the man in the moon? An old 10,000-dollar bill in Bill Gates’ wallet?

You need a pure specimen of the virus to start with, if you want to make sure you’re fleshing out its genetic sequence.

A piece of RNA, as a starting sample, doesn’t work. It’s somewhere between a random shot in the dark and a preconceived notion.

Let’s say, instead of a purified and isolated virus, separated from all surrounding material, we’re talking about a gun used in a crime. At trial, a lab technician from the vaunted FBI lab is testifying.

Defense Attorney: So you’re sure the gun was recovered from my client’s car?

FBI tech: Absolutely.

Defense Attorney: Please explain how you located the gun.

FBI tech: It was in the junkyard.

Defense Attorney: Excuse me?

FBI tech: Well, you see, the defendant’s car was in an auto junkyard, along with about a thousand other cars. His car wasn’t actually in one piece. It had been taken apart. And then there was the dog.

Defense Attorney: The dog?

FBI tech: The watch dog. He roams over the whole junkyard. He picks up objects in his mouth and runs around with them. We found his saliva on the gun.

Defense Attorney: The gun used in the crime.

FBI tech: As far as we know. The weapon was pretty banged up. Apparently, it had been in a car that was crushed in one of those machines.

Defense Attorney: I see. Did you actually discover DNA from my client on the gun?

FBI tech: Yes. Well, I mean, we found human DNA on the gun. The sample was mixed with other DNA from an unknown source. It was difficult to separate the two samples from each other.

Defense Attorney: How difficult?

FBI tech: Isolation wasn’t possible. We couldn’t make a positive ID. But we did find a tiny piece of red thread on the gun. We determined it came from a shirt.

Defense Attorney: My client doesn’t own a red shirt.

FBI tech: He might have discarded a red shirt. And he does own shirts. Generally speaking.

At this point, the judge leans over and says to the FBI lab tech, “Are you drunk?”

FBI tech: Certainly not, Your Honor. I might have had a few drinks with lunch. I sometimes do.

So much for isolation of the gun.

Or the virus.

Intelligent researchers, where they exist, do talk about isolation and purification of a new virus from surrounding material. And if they understand what those two terms mean, they know how important this process is.


In past articles, I’ve detailed how large coherent studies should be done (but aren’t), using electron microscopy, to determine a) whether or not a new virus has been discovered, and b) how probable it is that the virus, if it exists, is causing harm to some people (whose immune systems are already compromised).

Nothing is riding on all this except the immediate future of the human race—since political leaders have decided to destroy untold numbers of jobs, businesses, and lives, all based on a story about a new pandemic virus.

Talk about a sell-job. They don’t have to isolate the virus because they’ve found its genetic sequence. That’s called putting the cart before the horse.

Based on this reasoning, I believe I could say I’ve discovered a thousand viruses in my cellar. I have “their genetic sequences.” Meaning: I’ve found sequences from who-knows-what listed in old public reports.

In elementary logic, students are taught that inferences flow from prior premises and propositions and simple rules. If you erase those premises and propositions and rules, you have nothing. You have conclusions whose basis is missing.

The statement, “We have the genetic sequence,” is meant to hypnotize the uninformed, who have been trained to salute any claim which refers to genes, as if they’re magic.

For example, there was a period during which researchers tried to pass off the idea, “one disease, one gene is the cause.” Eventually, they were forced to admit this notion didn’t fly. It was a simpleton’s fantasy. They then retreated and concocted a different hypothesis: any given disease was caused by a collection of genes, acting in concert. This soupy assertion had the advantage of vagueness; it was hyped as a moving target. If one collection of genes didn’t work (and it inevitably didn’t), researchers, with a straight face, could say the cause must be another collection.

Junkyard science.

“We might have found something that resembled a gun near a piece of what was once someone’s car, in a location filled with tens of thousands of pieces of cars. And there was a dog.”

Brilliant precision.

“We’ve narrowed down the search for the killer, Chief. There’s a twelve-percent chance he was in New York last Thursday.”

“How many people were in New York last Thursday?”

“About seven million.”

“Keep going. You’re getting somewhere.”

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

45 comments on ““No need to isolate the new virus, we have its genetic sequence”: Really?

  1. Brett Morgen says:

    Another great, funny, entertaining, and informative article. Jon Rappoport is based: fact. Thank you Jon! Always the highlight of my day to read your wonderful work and I always get a genuine laugh.

  2. From Elsewhere says:

    It is about time for the inner professionals to cast out these fake scientists pretending and posing as professionals. Cleansing time, fear aside. Tell the people and the king he is naked.

    How many deaths were caused by heart attacks, cancer, kidney disfunction or plain medical error?

  3. Larry C says:

    “Nothing is riding on all this except the immediate future of the human race—since political leaders have decided to destroy untold numbers of jobs, businesses, and lives, all based on a story about a new pandemic virus.”

    The operative word is *story*. For ages, we’ve been awash in so many half-assed stories (Official Narratives), that we don’t know whether we’re on foot of horseback.

    • za ka lu says:


      covid cannot be isolated because it does not exist? answers why this essential step was glossed over–

      yet they claim genetic sequence is known while never isolating??!! impossible–

      to get a result, the PRR test cannot test for covid and must test for basic flesh and blood material like chromosome 8 because there is no covid–

      we are lied to about everything, all of their game is wretched fiction–

      stop playing their game

  4. Opie Poik says:

    No need to check the evidence, Your Honor. My client’s a good man. He gives his booty, er, I mean, ethically earned wealth, to the depopulation agenda, er, ah, charity for the less-fortunate. (No one in here, but us chickens, officer!)

    1,000 German doctors declare Covert-19 a scam: https://fromrome.info/2020/08/24/1000-german-doctors-say-covid-19-is-100-a-scam/

    Spanish doctor debunks corona hype: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwlkumcRf6w&feature=emb_title (W/English subtitles) The news anchor harridan is as bad as America’s. Shut up, twit, and let the man talk, idjit.

  5. Greg C. says:

    The sole purpose of the mask is to advance a lie, and all mask wearers are proxy liars.

    • viper says:

      good little socialists……….

    • Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

      LET’S TELL ‘EM
      I think I’ll start calling them all liars to their faces. You’re right. Wait… maybe that’s not a good idea. What IS possible is to make fun of the non-existent virus however. With trusted employees at stores, I’ve done a little bit that has me spotting a virus flying through the air like a mosquito. I’ll look up and say– “There! There’s a virus!” and I’ll flail my arms around trying to swoosh it away. “Get away from me!” I’ll say. It cracks the right people up when done right. I limit my performance to about 10 seconds so I don’t really push some serious buttons.

      • Donald says:

        guysi dont post very much
        you don’t have to believe anything i say but here goes…

        belief is like a faith…it turns tribal very quickly.
        no one is looking for a truth when its tribal..its all about tribal dynamics.
        faith as medicine, faith as not medicine, faith as a virus, faith as not a virus…but faith all the same.

        my view is that there is no virus because…why would there be?
        we are surrounded by 10 power 31 viruses…symbiotic with our historical interactions with the world in which we live… and none of them has killed us and in all probablity have integrated with us…to make us less susceptible to disease and illness…terrain theory wins out.

        people who wear masks are scared shitless…you can take the piss and have faith that they are your enemy..you can rallying against them which just further creates a divide and separates the tribes…they are not a tribe against you…they are in fear!

        we are one tribe and one tribe only…the virus is in relity the seperation of people.

        it becomes a tribal issue of us against them and that makes us all weak.

        the only way to convince fearful people not to be in fear is to make them not scared…they are unable to see what we say…we can support them unconditionally…we need them….we can love them regardless…it will not disempower our point that wearing masks is ridiculous and the virus is not real.

        our courage is defined by the fact that we have to be vulnerable

        • Rick Potvin in Phoenix AZ says:

          BE FUNNY
          I don’t like to be vulnerable… I like to be cautiously funny. I’ve had several people pull their masks down right in front of me once I started talking to them and showing them my smile. Imagine that! Girls show me their naked faces! Well… guys too. It takes courage to be cautiously funny.

      • hayden says:

        speaking of chimps, sometimes i feel a good old knuckle sandwich is good and puts people into place when they become overly stupid on all fronts….
        Human hands evolved so we could punch each other

        Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23018-human-hands-evolved-so-we-could-punch-each-other/#ixzz6WCVcRQVf


  6. Fred says:

    The chief says, “New York, eh? City, or state?” The investigators answer, “Yes, probably, we think so.” Percentage of certainty, now: .000012% (maybe, possibly?).
    Even less precise now, than before, but why bother to make the lie an exactitude? The sheeple won’t/can’t investigate it, as long as someone else can/will do ALL their thinking for them.

  7. Sean says:

    I run around and ask people, “What is Operation Warp Speed?” No one even knows.

  8. Joe says:

    Jon you’re the best I follow you every day you’re articles are right on the money and that’s how I keep my Sanity

  9. Brad says:

    Seems to me chimpanzees and humans share over 90% of the same DNA so really why not ignore the small difference and just call us one species.

  10. Piksil says:

    We think the virus came from a bat.



    • Opie Poik says:

      Right? When, of course, we all know it actually came from one of those online novelty/prank/magic stores, which sell fake plastic vomit and dog poo, etc.

  11. Jon, you nailed it as usual!

    FOI responses from 9 institutions in Canada, NZ and Australia: we searched our records and found none describing the isolation of any “COVID-19 virus” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient, anywhere on the planet,ever:


  12. Madness says:


    Many version was already deleted, this mirrored one still alive while I am typing (and I am downloading it).

    It is an interview, Dr Andrew Kaufman and David Icke. Dr Kaufman compared the so called novel virus sample (the base OF PCR testing to compare) and it is turned out it is not from a virus but from homo sapiens, Chromosome 8. The only reason that not everyone ends up with positive that they dilute the samples taken from people.

    It’s so HUGE. They are so bold! Of course we have more and more ‘asymptomatic’. They are humans of course they have a piece of human material in them.

    WE MUST STOP THEM. Share the truth. SHARE, SHARE, SHARE.

    • Jubal says:

      Well, I’ve been able to watch againt that part of Andrew Kaufman’s video and I what I said is not exact. He is clearly speaking about viruses in general when he quotes James Hildreth. This is what Dr Kaufman said when introducing the slide with James Hildreth quote: “I happened to be looking on the virology literature and actually they also think that exosomes and viruses are possibly the same thing.” The problem is that Dr Kaufman lets us believe that Hildreth was talking about viruses in general (not the SARS-2-CoV as I mistakenly said in my previous comment) instead of the HIV. Sorry for the confusion.

      • Madness says:

        Does it matter? Sorry, I mean I saw the presentation of Dr Kaufman, the video showing eletronmicroscope’ photos about exosomes and viruses and comparing to them. They are the same.
        To my best understanding no virus ever was properly isolated and proven to cause a thing.
        When it comes to professionals – who to believe – for it is Stefan Lanka, he got Nobel to discover a giant sea-virus, he surely knows what he is talking about. Besides he was the first (many years ago) who made the public aware how BP and MSM and the rest related to them are lying about photos of viruses, faking images of them.
        I also found interesting that one of the most feared virus – small pox – disappeared. Or that in past the big epidemics were caused by bacteria but virus. The only exception is small pox… but we can’t examine it as disappeared.
        I’ve been following Jon’s work for years now. I followed how the big epidemics failed one by one and were proven being a scam.

        Just follow the money.

        • Jubal says:

          Never mind. The comment you are replying to is a correction to a first comment I made that for some reason is not shown. My second comment (shown) is meaningless without the first one (not shown). I’m inclined to side with Dr Kaufman and I like his way of explaining the ideas he puts forth. I just was trying to make a point about the need for unblemished reasoning, concerning another video (not the one you posted).

          The main point of my first comment was to ask for help to clarify a supposed rebuttal of the human chromosome 8 genetic sequence story that I found elsewhere.

          Also, in my first comment I included a link to the same interview you link, but in David Icke’s Bitchute channel, just in case YouTube takes down the one you posted. We should use links from other platforms, like Bitchute, Banned.video and Brighteon when possible, to fight censorship by the technocrats.

    • za ka lu says:

      100% error rate with pcr test

      thx madness

  13. useless eater says:

    Just consider how efficiently the fear/panic (‘mind killer’ as per Frank Herbert’s “Dune”) has been broadcast/channeled via social media towards those w/ short attention span and lacking critical thinking/inquisitive mind, and what the nefarious social engineers (cue Tavistock Institute et al.) have achived through the means of decade-long, post-WWII predictive programing among the conformist / system peddler / victim MASSes of Stockholm Syndrome (80%, my estimate):



  14. Duke Walters says:

    How can we help expose and bring down these liars and conmen?

  15. Karl Pomeroy says:

    “Nothing is riding on all this except the immediate future of the human race—since political leaders have decided to destroy untold numbers of jobs, businesses, and lives . . .”

    The Gateway Pundit has an article today arguing China is the perpetrator of the COVID pandemic shutdown hoax. They accomplished this feat using tens of thousands of fake Twitter accounts, putting pressure on political leaders around the world.

    I’ve been trying to determine for months who perpetrated this hoax, with little success. All I found were improbable speculations. This is the first theory outlining the MEANS of perpetration.

    Scroll down thegatewaypundit dot com main page for the article on China.

    • Low Voltage says:

      Yes. The Chinese Communist Party has corrupted our beloved “democracy,” and they forced Hollywood to make dozens of “killer virus” movies.

    • Jen says:

      I have often wondered during these last few months how easily the evil ones would be defeated if we all just jumped off of social media and stopped watching TV. It’s as though we’ve forgotten that the internet is not real. How can somthing not real create reality?

      My husband has a theory that the push for masks is to give us the same psychological feeling of cruising on the internet, that masks make us feel anonymous and therefore our minds lose the ability to distinguish the virtual world from the real world. I find it fascinating.

      Are you real to me? Am I real to you? On the internet or behind a mask you can be whoever you want to be.That’s freedom. I expect that shortly. “Masks make me feel free to be who I truly am.” Ugh.

  16. gavin says:

    Another amusing article, thanks Jon! I was wondering myself about the “genetic sequence” why dont they hvae an actual cell or dna of this new virus? if so many people have it and there are so many positive tests with the virus apparently in the samples then why cant they just pull some out and use that as the basis for all their new vaccines and other experiments instead of going off some arbitrary gene sequence? i wish i was a virologist so i could actually pull this shit apart and get people to listen.

  17. Tom says:

    The lie is too far out now, and is being inoculated (pardon the pun) by so many layers of other lies, that it is nigh on impossible to rein it in. That’s what truth tellers like this site is facing.

    Yes, we have the truth. Yes, we have all the research and the logic. But so what? Who’s listening? Do you see how many are masked out there, compared to the non-masked?

  18. Rachel says:

    I always enjoy your commentary on InfoWars. I wish you would include more of your commentary in your articles. Although I realize that would be against your goals. Still, your words need to be heard.

    In case anyone else wants to watch: https://youtu.be/ZESb_GtCfjA (around 2hr 15min in)

  19. BDBinc says:

    I have not investigated this “Project 8″ but I would bet that since we have the rna they call ” corona virus” up our nasal passage the small rna sequence is in our microbiome and possibly as some say in our dna.

  20. Aethelfrith says:


    The fact that COVID is an RNA virus makes the fairy tale of it persisting on surfaces for weeks and weeks utterly, utterly laughable.

    I’ve worked in RNA-handling labs for years and one of the things they all have in common is paranoia regarding ungloved hands. You see, human skin naturally secretes RNA-digesting enzymes so we all have to wear gloves in such labs–not to protect ourselves, but to protect our samples.

    Do you remember the last politically-motivated epidemic, AIDS? It too is mediated by an RNA virus, one that is so fragile that it can only be spread by direct contact with the bloodstream or the genitalia.

  21. Paula Garten says:

    I have read but can’t verify that the PCR test “finds” a specific gene sequence that is every human being. That means there can’t be a negative result from PCR tests. Am I going in the right direction or is my deduction false? Thanks.

  22. Anon says:

    “The headline of this article is a typical defense offered to “prove” researchers actually discovered a new pandemic virus, SARS-CoV-2”

    What “article”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *