Fake science in the Oklahoma Bombing

How official “science” is deployed to advance a political agenda

by Jon Rappoport

November 22, 2019

(To join our email list, click here.)

The public wants to buy every official scientific claim the mainstream press pounds into their brains—whether the issue is vaccine safety, global warming, the “overwhelming success” of medical drugs, the Big Bang theory of the universe’s origin…

For most people, the notion that a political agenda underlies such scientific pronouncements is unthinkable.

So as an example, a very specific example of fake science, let’s look back at the attack on Oklahoma City.

On April 19, 1995, one-third of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City blew up, killing 169 people and wounding 680 others.

Three men were arrested and convicted: Tim McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Michael Fortier. McVeigh was put to death on June 11, 2001, Nichols is currently serving multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole, and Fortier was sentenced to 12 years (he served that term and was released).

The official narrative of the bombing stated: A Ryder truck parked at the curb outside the Murrah Building contained barrels of ammonium nitrate plus fuel oil (ANFO bombs), and their coordinated explosion occurred shortly after 9AM on the morning of April 19th.

In addition to the deaths and the woundings, the explosion impacted 324 buildings and 86 cars in the area.

(In my 1995, book, “The Oklahoma City Bombing, the Suppressed Truth,” I laid to rest the claim that ANFO bombs could have caused that much damage; and more importantly, I showed that an explosion coming out of a Ryder truck at the curb could not have caused the particular profile of damage sustained by the Murrah Building.)

The vaunted FBI lab decided that, indeed, all the damage and death HAD been caused by ANFO bombs in the Ryder truck.

But wait.

Buckle up.

Two years after the bombing, on March 22, 1997, we had this from CNN: “The Justice Department inspector general’s office has determined that the FBI crime laboratory working on the Oklahoma City bombing case made ‘scientifically unsound’ conclusions that were ‘biased in favor of the prosecution,’ The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.”

“…[FBI] supervisors approved lab reports that they ‘cannot support’ and…FBI lab officials may have erred about the size of the blast, the amount of explosives involved and the type of explosives used in the bombing[!].”

“…harshest criticism was of David Williams, a supervisory agent in the [FBI] explosives unit, the paper [LA Times] said. Those flaws reportedly include the basis of his determination that the main charge of the explosion was ammonium nitrate. The inspector general called such a determination ‘inappropriate,’ the Times said.”

“…FBI officials found a receipt for ammonium nitrate at defendant [Terry] Nichols’ home and, because of that discovery, Williams slanted his conclusion to match the evidence.”

And with those revelations, the case, the investigation, the court trials, and press probes should have taken a whole new direction. But they didn’t.

The fake science was allowed to stand.

Therefore, other paths of investigation were abandoned. If bombs did, in fact, explode in the Ryder truck, but didn’t cause the major damage, then those bombs were a cover for other explosions of separate origin—for example, charges wired inside the columns of the Murrah Building, triggered at the exact moment the Ryder Truck explosion occurred.

Now we would be talking about a very sophisticated operation, far beyond the technical skills of McVeigh, Nichols, and Fortier.

Who knows where an honest in-depth investigation would have led? The whole idea of anti-government militia terrorism in the OKC attack—symbolized by McVeigh—was used by President Bill Clinton to bring the frightened public “back to the federal government” as their ultimate protector and savior.

Instead, the public might have been treated to a true story about a false flag operation, in which case President Clinton’s massaged message would never have been delivered.

But the fake crooked science pushed by the FBI lab was permitted to stand—despite exposure as fraud—and the story of militia terrorists trying to bring down the federal government was allowed to stand as well.

The year 1995 was rife with anti-government sentiment in America. This wasn’t merely a bunch of militias talking about insurrection. This was widespread dissatisfaction, on the part of many Americans, who were seeing federal power expand beyond any semblance of constitutionality.

As an object lesson, the Oklahoma Bombing was: “You see what happens when crazy people are allowed to own guns and oppose the government? Stop listening to anti-government rhetoric. It’s horribly dangerous. We, the government, are here to protect you. Come home to us. Have faith in us. We’ll punish the offenders. We’ll make America safe again. Let’s all come together and oppose these maniacs who want to destroy our way of life…”

The lesson worked.

Many scared Americans signed on to Clinton’s agenda.

And fake FBI science was used to bolster that agenda.

Even when exposed as fake by mainstream press outlets—however briefly, with no determined follow-up—the federal brainwashing held. The myth was stronger than reality.

If the federal government can egregiously lie about an event as huge as the Oklahoma Bombing, using fake science as a cover—what wouldn’t they lie about?

That’s a question which answers itself.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

18 comments on “Fake science in the Oklahoma Bombing

  1. JoAnn Dolberg says:

    Giving you a “thumbs up” here.

  2. Jack says:

    Reports that day said the buildings across the street had their windows INTACT. This means the explosion wasn’t strong enough to blow out glass but was strong enough to destroy the face of a building? (truck exploded with the force emitting in a spherical direction…all directions).


    Also, the rebar in the building was blown OUTWARD. People need physics lesson–rebar to exit the wall must have the force coming from behind it, hence INSIDE the building. NOT the truck.

    Also ALL the FBI people were told NOT to be in the building that morning in advance!

    To further make Jon’s point, we had Ruby Ridge in that era whereby govt protesters were shot to death.

    AND…don’t forget Waco Texas, where the military burned ALIVE CHILDREN, women, etc. using tanks to invade the alleged cult’s compound to “get the leader”. Oh yeah, their leader jogged OUTSIDE the compound into the surrounding neighborhoods on a DAILY basis.

    Clearly picking up the jogging leader wouldn’t send the right message.

    BURNING the families ALIVE…now THAT’S the message they sent to anybody else thinking of questioning the govt!

    And these Leftists bitch about Trump? Useful idiots.

  3. The Watchman says:

    Good article, Jon. Did not ralize you had your blog available until a few days ago. Once again linking most of your articles at

  4. Scott says:

    I remember a mainstream view of the area from above, showed a light pole in front of the bulding and would have been right next to the truck, but it was not hurt or blown down at all.
    The discovery channel did an experiment bu filling a ryder truck with the explossives allegedly involved, It left a big crater beneath where the truck had been and the back axel was mangled. So much for the official findings. The street and pole were fine and so was the axle a couple blocks way, Busted!!!

    Initially, there was a john doe 2 and then in not much time, no more talk or JD 2 anymore Just Tim and that other guy said to be an acommplice. Terry something was it? what a joke.

    • Marcel says:

      And once again, all the security cameras from all surrounding buildings had stopped functioning about half an hour before the explosion. Just like the Jeffrey Epstein murder.

  5. Sam says:

    I remember a video taped interview of a lady who worked in the Murrah building. Before the building was brought down she said she saw workers drilling holes into the concrete supports, may have been an underground parking area. Now, why would anyone drill holes into concrete supports? I doubt they were checking for termites, unless OKC has termites that eat concrete.

  6. paschn says:


    Thank you sir!


  7. Marcel says:

    Fake it was. I still clearly recall watching the first responders on the news come running out of the Murrah Building in a panic yelling that there were still explosives inside.

  8. Joseph Olson says:

    “Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11”
    “Exposing NIST Jenga Game”
    “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes”
    all at > VeteransToday(.)com
    WTC vaporization declassified
    Nuclear Education articles at VT

  9. Hugh says:

    What I don’t understand is why the 3 men charged did not put up more of a stink…I don’t remember the dying words proclaiming innocence…but I agree with this assessment wholeheartedly.

    • Marcel says:

      A man who had been in the neighbouring cell to McVeigh’s said in an interview that McVeigh told him that he had been promised an antidote to the poison injected so that after being declared officially dead on execution day, he would be injected with the antidote and would come back to life.

    • jim says:

      u really think they killed mcvieh

  10. Paul Bunnell says:

    The New American Magazine published dozens of stories about the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. Here is a link:https://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_googlesearch_cse&n=30&view=googlesearchs&cx=017005590850498995214%3Asnxgxrq2gpc&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Murrah+Building&sa=Search

    My view is that the OKC bombing was an inside job, just like 9/11. There is too much evidence to believe otherwise. Check out these stories from The New American and see for yourselves.

  11. JC says:

    Remember they tried to pass the patriot act immediately following the incident just as they did after New York but it didn’t fly, not catastrophic enough or not enough owned yet). Then they tried from underneath in NY and that failed. Remember Peter Jennings asking George who was at the site in NY the following day saying “George everybody in NY wants to know “Where is all the debris?” After appearing to not hear the question (waiting for instruction on how to reply), he responded “Um…it evaporated(?). Funny I wasn’t aware the solids could do that?

    • Have your read the book “Where Did the Towers Go” by Dr. Judy Wood, which scientifically explains how the towers were, in her words, “dustified” by directed energy weapons? It reads like a mystery novel, but she has NO agenda. Great book—you won’t be able to put it down. Hardback is not cheap at $50 but then the price of truth is never cheap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *