Altering human genetics through vaccination

by Jon Rappoport

June 26, 2018

(To join our email list, click here.)

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has launched efforts to create a vaccine that would protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot.

Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.

Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project.

Here is a sentence from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:

“NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”

This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.

Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s gene therapy.

In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.

Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—

They will permanently alter your DNA

The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research—the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was three years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, he will live with that change—and all the ripple effects in his genetic makeup—for the rest of his life.

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun. Anyone and everyone on Earth injected with a DNA vaccine will undergo permanent and unknown genetic changes…

And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is re-engineering humans in far-reaching ways.

The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.

The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.

It means the right to preserve your inherent DNA.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

28 comments on “Altering human genetics through vaccination

  1. Eliza Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal and commented:
    ALL vaccines are ineffectual and bogus. It’s about money, control, and manipulation.

  2. darkovelcek says:

    Thank you for this info brother.

  3. NaturalWoman says:

    VERY scary coming from people who have already earned our distrust. Thanks for the heads-up, Jon. These mad scientists might just eliminate human life on earth.

  4. IMNAHA says:

    This is simply a covert operation to genetically reengineer the human species under the guise of keeping the populace “healthy”. The ultimate goal is a compliant recyclable species that is totally cut off from knowledge of or desire to connect with their true spiritual origins. The project seems to be accelerating in this technocratic age…

  5. Diogenes Shrugged says:

    There are much better candidates for that $billion donation. Just offhand, I can think of at least a dozen. Besides, the flu “problem” is already solved:

    In other news, Massachusetts Senator and big spender Ed Markey has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal autism-prevention vaccine.

    “If we do a really great job on new autism-prevention vaccines, we could reduce average world I.Q. by perhaps 10-15%,” he claimed.

  6. Jodrphine Lee says:



  7. Mark says:

    This is the same nitwit logic that drives GMO foods and destined for the same failures for the same reason: pathogens will adapt! We now have super-bugs and super-weeds because of genetic engineering of plants, and DNA engineering is guaranteed to do something similar.

    Can scientists really be that stupid, or are they laying the groundwork for future products by deliberately provoking super-diseases? Given the history of big pharma, I suspect the latter.

  8. From Quebec says:

    What could possibly go wrong? These people are crazy our should I say criminals?

  9. Not So Free says:

    Sounds like just another way to lower the population of the earth.
    Has anyone ever wondered how much of this *stuff* TPTB give their children?

  10. The importance of this article is not in revision of the topic, Jon.

    Our science CANNOT alter DNA (beyond “symptomatic” short term effects) because it doesn’t understand DNA.

    Your use of the “borrowed” term “flu strains” is the important focus here. There are NO flu strains per se. Therefore to suggest an “eradication campaign” against them is dishonest to say the least.

    Influenza patterns reflect how bodies “deal” with invasion. Here’s where DNA (the real stuff) comes in. Because the manner it is “processed” extends way beyond the body – out to genetic groups, sub-groups and specialities, multiple bodies (perhaps even entire populations) general “reaction” to specific attacks (invasions).can appear to form similar-looking spontaneous patterns which are conveniently “generically” labelled “flu strains”.

    Great “brand”!!!!!

    Air bourn pollutants are the commonest invaders. You breathe them in. The body is forced to process the result.


    • Rian says:

      Plum island on a mass scale. Wait until those new genes see anything, as an invader, food even.

      • Rian, clearly you “believe” the propaganda. The only way your suggestion would be possible is if a new human hybrid was created. I do not believe we have “inherited” sufficient knowledge/technologies/abilities to make this happen on our reality plane.

      • Sue says:

        Rian, Just in case you aren’t familiar with Ozzie, he believes he is the smartest person in the universe, ever (including Einstein), and provides this personal profile on his blog:
        I describe myself as a “Cosmic hinge” as the coming together of all entities, not necessarily via “genetic” connection, but by virtue of being selected by Prime Source. Being the emmissary of Prime Source, I am a universal judge. That judgement is committed to the balance of all things. My last incarnation was 19,000 years ago as iXosanna.

        So, you may keep that in mind when he is handing down his judgements as the final word on everything.

  11. henry says:

    How much of your DNA can be replaced before the experts will deem you to not be human? Does the law protect non-humans?

    • NaturalWoman says:

      Or, how much will give them claim to ownership or your body the way Monsanto owns GMO plants and only they can reproduce them.

    • Theodore says:

      Yeah, the draft statutory laws for that were written up around 2006 (and are sitting in the can for soon-to-be future use)…

      under the following doorway…

      draft laws for chimeras, draft laws for human enhancement
      reported on by Tom Horn

      go to the 8m15m mark in the video below…

      note: this all so beyond Judaeo-Christian culture and ethics that, well, Judaeo-Christian culture and ethics will need to become moot.

      TRANSHUMANISM (Full): Techno-eugenics for the neo-feudal age — Tom Horn interview, by Alex Ansary

      • NaturalWoman says:

        Among the limitations that might be imposed on us is an expiration date of their choosing. How handy if we were to die before we collect our retirement, but after we’d fully paid in to it. Thanks for this link.

    • Sue says:

      The law never protects non-humans from the horrors of the vivisection labs. What comes our way is the tip of the iceberg.

    • Jenn says:

      People already do not want to put male or female on their birth certificates. They probably will not care if they are labelled as human anyways.

  12. williamberg1st says:

    My first reaction is with an open mind and the concept this is a great introduction to the future for mankind.
    But then I remember- these people do not really care if I live or die- I am nothing to them but a provider of resources, be it money or other gains. They already know such a vaccine would help cause over population on a higher scale, and why would they want that? There must be an alternative purpose.
    After all, what have they done in the past to prove to me they are trustworthy? I can say they have done plenty to prove they are not.

    • I think this guy is onto something: “5,000 years of vaccine free human history with a population increase of 6 Billion people proves that vaccines are designed to stifle the evolutionary process, not protect people.” ~ Tim Singleton

  13. Sue says:

    Our bodies have already been, at the very least, heavily damaged and compromised by being injected with foreign RNA, DNA, and viruses from animals. The most infamous example is the cancer causing SV40 virus from the monkey kidneys used in the polio vaccine. It doesn’t cause cancer in the natural host, but does cause (and is causing) cancer in people injected with it.

    In addition, these cells from different species (including worms) are attaching to our own cells, organs, etc., causing them to appear alien to our immune systems. Dr. Harold Buttram mentioned this over 30 years ago, in his book, “Vaccinations and Immune Malfunction.”

    So, we are already well on our way.

  14. Trapper John says:

    The GodShot won’t work because viruses mutate early and often. Does this confirm that Mochelle Obama is infact a virus? Vote early and often are her words.

  15. roger g davis says:

    Want your Social Security check Granny? Then come get your nice vaccine.

  16. John Kissel says:

    Hey Jon, John here. Im not goin on the Bible rant here. I dont know, as “WE” dont, but this bizz with altering DNA just may have been the reason behind the great flood. All of the crap we humans do is forgivable in Gods eyes but changing his work is a fuckin no no. Thanks for your insight man.

  17. Absolutely no. Read this article and then tell me we should be messing with gene therapy under the guise of vaccination. More cases of polio are caused BY THE VACCINE then by wild polio virus. That’s NOT a win. That’s incompetence and not doing enough research and testing.

  18. John Dunlap says:

    I don’t think we are justified in discussing this man made disaster in the future tense.

    “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

    Consider that statement in the context of all of the clandestine medical experimentation which has been perpetrated on the general public which has already been admitted to, and the reams of evidence hinting at much more that is still hidden. In this technique, the DNA is delivered by a virus. By the way, our gut bacteria, in fact most bacteria, have mechanisms allowing them to share genetic material with other bacteria species. In fact, “species” is probably not an accurate way to classify bacteria, since they can and do share DNA frequently across apparent species barriers. This is what CRISPR is, a natural mechanism which allows cells to “learn” to make antibodies against viruses by clipping and inserting segments of the virus’s DNA or RNA into their own genes.

    So, I.G.T. uses a virus to insert synthetic genes into our DNA. Viruses do not necessarilly have to be injected. They can be administered orally or by aerosol (chemtrails, anyone?). I think it is safe to assume, pending verification, that we aren’t the same Homo Sapiens we were ten years ago…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *