Bombshell accusation: Hillary never had a State Department email address; all emails were sent to her at her private unsecured email

by Jon Rappoport

June 25, 2018

Many people have been led to believe Hillary had two separate email accounts. One was a traditional, secure, State Department address, where she received most of her classified information; the other was her personal, sloppily run, wide open, unsecured email, where she received some classified information. But wait.

Paul Sperry (NY Post) has the explosive story. Or, rather, he had it on January 31, 2016. That’s when it was published. What happened to it?

Sperry/2016: “The State Department is lying when it says it didn’t know until it was too late that Hillary Clinton was improperly using personal emails and a private server to conduct official business — because it never set up an agency email address for her in the first place, the department’s former top watchdog says.”

“’This was all planned in advance’ to skirt rules governing federal records management, said Howard J. Krongard, who served as the agency’s [State Department] inspector general from 2005 to 2008.”

“The Harvard-educated lawyer points out that, from Day One, Clinton was never assigned and never used a email address like previous secretaries.”

“’That’s a change in the standard. It tells me that this was premeditated. And this eliminates claims by the State Department that they were unaware of her private email server until later,’ Krongard said in an exclusive interview. ‘How else was she supposed to do business without [an official State Department] email?’”

“He also points to the unusual absence of a permanent [State Department] inspector general during Clinton’s entire 2009-2013 term at the department. He said the 5½-year vacancy was unprecedented.”

“’This is a major gap. In fact, it’s without precedent,’ he said. ‘It’s the longest period any department has gone without an IG’.”

“Inspectors general serve an essential and unique role in the federal government by independently investigating agency waste, fraud and abuse. Their oversight also covers violations of communications security procedures.”

“’It’s clear she did not want to be subject to internal investigations,’ Krongard said. An email audit would have easily uncovered the secret information flowing from classified government networks to the private unprotected system she set up in her New York home.”

“He says ‘the key’ to the FBI’s investigation of Emailgate is determining how highly sensitive state secrets in the classified network, known as SIPRNet, ended up in Clinton’s personal emails.”

“’The starting point of the investigation is the material going through SIPRNet. She couldn’t function without the information coming over SIPRNet,’ Krongard said. ‘How did she get it on her home server? It can’t just jump from one system to the other. Someone had to move it, copy it. The question is who did that?’”

“As The Post first reported, the FBI is investigating whether Clinton’s deputies copied top-secret information from the department’s classified network to its unclassified network where it was sent to Hillary’s unsecured, unencrypted email account.”

I did a bit of further searching, and came across a nugget buried in a CNN article, dated 3/3/15, “Team Clinton: ‘Nothing nefarious’ at State,” by Dan Merica and Laura Koran. Here it is:

“On Tuesday, Marie Harf, a deputy State Department spokeswoman, said… ’While Secretary Clinton did not have a classified email system, she did have multiple other ways of communicating in a classified manner, including assistants printing documents for her, secure phone calls, and secure video conferences,’ Harf added.”


What does that indicate? It appears to confirm that Clinton NEVER had a secured, protected, official State Department email address. Therefore, despite denials, she must have been conducting classified government business through her own unsecured email account.

Was this issue ever brought up during interviews the FBI conducted with Hillary? If so, what were her responses?

For example, did she say, “Back off and ease up, boys, we’re all in this together”? Did she say, “We all know I’m trying to shield the Clinton Foundation operations and money”?

She never had an official State Department email account? She conducted all her classified email communication on her unsecured home server? There was no permanent inspector general at the State Department during her tenure as Secretary of State? The State Department lied when it said it only discovered her private email account late in the game?

She’s clean as a whistle. Nothing to see here. Don’t worry, be happy.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “Bombshell accusation: Hillary never had a State Department email address; all emails were sent to her at her private unsecured email

  1. Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    This makes the FBI investigation into her crimes even more of a sham.

  2. paschnn1 says:

    Wow. The LITERAL poster child for betrayal/treason/evil is the Clinton Crime Family.But what this shows, (EVEN MORE terrifying than the perpetrators et al?)

    “Our” government not only looking the “Other Way” but their complicity/lack of honor in not prosecuting them to the fullest, up to and INCLUDING public hangings.

    Ultimately, to WHOM do they ALL answer/obey?

    “Thanks to the terrible power of our international banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, Since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest, The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100 million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars and the end is not yet.”

    Rabbi Reichorn 1869

    “No Rothschild is English… No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians.”

    Ezra Pound, March 15, 1942 radio broadcast

    Revelation 3:9
    Look! I will make those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews yet are not, but are lying—look! I will make them come and bow before your feet and make them know that I have loved you.

    If it walks like a duck – quacks like a duck – pretty safe assumption, it’s a duck.

    • middleway says:

      There is something that has remained hidden for thousands of years. Until you fully investigate and comprehend the ‘Lost Tribes of Israel’ and ‘The House of Orange’ you will remain lost in the tangled web of diversion and deception.

    • Larry says:

      “Ultimately, to WHOM do they ALL answer/obey?”

      Now THAT is an interesting question.

  3. Theodore says:

    Crooked Hillary

  4. bob klinck says:

    What a spectacle the endless, going-nowhere “investigation” of high-level criminality in the US is–always said to be on the verge of a conclusion, but never actually delivering. What American can observe it and still believe in their country’s exceptionalism? There’s nothing exceptional about being a country paralyzed by corruption (like all the others).

  5. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    The dominoes continue to fall…

  6. From Quebec says:

    It is time to call for the Military Tribunals to clean the whole corruption.

  7. Testing123 says:

    Just for the record SIPR is a SECRET — not Top Secret network – I detest this woman and what she did but the info must be correct. Clinton’s deputies copied top-secret….. Not from SIPRnet they didn’t

    • Theodore says:

      excellent point.

      BTW, are “top secret” encrypted emails even allowed to be sent — if the destination (terminal) receiving it is not in a SCIF? And, with a web-based client or client-side client or both? Also, is “top secret” info as an “attachment” (not in-body) allowed? Regardless, would need a laptop/desktop (client) with encrypted harddrive, no?

      To look at “top secret”, doesn’t one always need to be sitting inside of a SCIF?

      technically, isn’t transmission of “top secret” sent only from SCIF to SCIF and only via a private government controlled network?

      what year did the “top secret Cable” — from DC to an embassy overseas (SCIF to SCIF) — implement “encrypted email technology” as the transport protocol for the dedicated private government network?

      • Testing123 says:

        Yes they are certainly allowed and for any TS attachment the entire email must be TS and most likely NOFORN – there is a classifier tool on most of these networks. There are all kinds of policies in place for this kind of thing- but at the very beginning are the paper briefing documents one must initially sign to get access in the first place.
        You promise protection of this information and non disclosure /discretion for life. She MUST have signed hers too.

  8. Comrade Obama says:

    There was in fact an acting IG, a crook who could be relied upon to do the bidding of those who rewarded him. He was a the principal office at the consulate at Durban, though his name now escapes me.

    Further the Sec State would get code word messages in addition to the normal classified traffic. Rest assured this traffic was compromised-probably because the Hildabeast was carrying on illegal activities and wished no offical record which brings us to the question of the day.

    State Security, IT, the President, and the National security advisor had to be aware of this and the dangers it represented yet all allowed it. This violates every security rule in the books. There is no excuse for this. One and all need to go to prison.

    But based on past staff who have stolen secrets and stuffed it in their underwear, stolen trunks fills of secret documents in their car trunks and had them spilled on highways, allowed non cleared staff members to handle classified documents-without any real penalities-what odds do you give me that one all skate without so much as an hour of community service?

    We live in a corrupt and perverse time. Let’s just burn the whole thing down and start anew.

  9. truthfarmer says:

    Reblogged this on Truth Farmer and commented:
    This really clarifies things…A few that I was completely unaware of. This is INDEED a Bombshell.

  10. ddrake says:

    No other reason can exist, other than they were FOR SALE. America for SALE. This is outright TREASON and SEDITION of the highest order. Time for Hillary to SWING from the highest GALLOWS. With ALL her cohorts and Obama. EXECUTE this COMMIE TRASH

  11. Jon, it is invariably what you “don’t say” that is all important. You give just enough information for the sane to reason.

    I’ll attempt to spell it out. It has long been theorised that “top level” government runs like an “old boys’ club”. Why would Hilary (the last bastion of the “old guard”) need anything more than her personal e-mail for “club” affairs?

    Any “unauthorised” daring to access that mechanism would have received the assassins lash, I feel sure.


  12. Barbara Kelly says:

    Well, Well, What do you expect out of this corrupt women. She doesn’t know how to play by the rules. And what ab liar she is. That smug look she gives us. Saw it in the court room when Goudy was questioning her.

  13. Bud Hughes says:

    So this would mean that Obamas claim that he only learned Hillary was using a private email address when everyone else did – when it was published in the news – was categorically false. He could not communicate with her on a secure State Dept. system if she never had a secure email address set up in the first place.

    Which means Obama communicated classified info over some other non-authorized system. It is not possible at least some of a Presidents emails to a Secretary of State did not involve classified info. I would guess that is a crime.

    It also means she deleted all her Obama emails that she stored on her private server when she deleted the 30,000 “personal” emails.

  14. Frank Boyle says:

    The Clintons have survived in politics and continued committing crimes and being successful in their “efforts” in my opinion because they have relied on 2 tactics they have used forever. 1.) Obtaining blackmail and willing to use it. 2.) Access to rogue darkside CIA operatives that go all the way back to the days of Bills governership and Mena Arkansas. Which means if you become a real threat to their power or exposing them you become a target for assassination.
    The state department has to be so contaminated and the individuals in it only concerned about being on “the winning team” that hey just roll over for these people. One of the reasons why Trump has had so much difficulty with the disloyal and leaking backstabbing state department is because it is contaminated by this completely self serving really criminal influence left over by Hillary and Obama.
    The evil get into positions of power and go far because 1.) they are willing to do anything to advance, which the good are not. 2.) The paralyzing fear, cowardice and inability to confront the evil and 3.) An unwillingness to use just as ruthless and uncompromising tactics as the evil to combat them.
    A president say of general Pattons bent would identify all those connected with this and immediately arrest them. It would be unpopular and some would scream facism but these slime our domestic enemies of the constitution and should receive no- quarter.

  15. FRED PHELPS says:


  16. FRED PHELPS says:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *