Explosive: a review of fake medical tests

Explosive: a review of fake medical tests

by Jon Rappoport

January 30, 2018

Over the years, during my investigations of deep fraud, I’ve uncovered very popular medical diagnostic tests that are wrong-headed, misleading, and fallacious.

Acceptance of this shocking truth would disrupt the “disease business” like a threshing machine moving through a wheat field.

Claims of diseases, based on tests, would be routinely turned back stamped UNPROVEN and FAKE.

ONE: Antibody test. This is given to detect the presence of a specific germ in a human. Prior to 1985, a positive test was generally taken as a sign of good health: the patient’s immune system detected the germ and defeated it.

However, after 1985, public health agencies and doctors reversed field. They arbitrarily claimed a positive test showed the person was ill or was going to become ill. No true science backed up this claim.

BOTTOM LINE: The truth is, a positive antibody test says nothing about whether a person is ill, will get ill, or is healthy. The true indicator is the strength of the entire immune system, not just the antibodies—and the overall strength of the immune system is NOT measured by an antibody test. THERE IS NO MEDICAL TEST THAT MEASURES THE OVERALL CONDITION OF A PERSON’S IMMUNE SYSTEM.

TWO: The PCR test. The Polymerase Chain Reaction tests for the presence of virus in a patient. The test takes a tiny sample, which technicians assume is a genetic piece of a virus far too small to observe, and amplifies it many times, so it can be identified. But in order to cause disease in a human, a huge quantity of virus (easily observed without the PCR) needs to be present. Therefore, a PCR test-result indicates nothing about disease—except that medical personnel couldn’t find enough virus in a person, to begin with, to assume the person was ill or would become ill.

THREE: All tests resulting in a diagnosis of any of the 300 officially certified mental disorders. Why? Because there are no definitive tests. No blood or saliva or urine tests. No genetic assays. No brain scans. All so-called mental disorders are diagnosed on the basis of consulting menus of behaviors. This is pseudoscience. It’s on the level of diagnosing cancer in a patient on the basis of an interview.

FOUR: All tests designed to assess the effectiveness of vaccines. The only marker is: does the vaccine produce antibodies in a human. But as I stated above, antibodies are only one aspect of the immune system. They aren’t the whole picture. A weak immune system’s antibodies are useless.

FIVE: Unsupported claims from public health officials. No tests at all, or hidden test results. For example, at the height of the so-called Swine Flu epidemic, in the fall of 2009, the CDC secretly stopped counting cases in America. Why? Because the overwhelming percentage of samples taken from the most likely Swine Flu patients, sent to labs, were coming back with no trace of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. In other words, the epidemic was a dud and a hoax. Based on this vacuum of evidence, the CDC went on to estimate that, in America, there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu.

This gigantic scandal doesn’t just apply to Swine Flu. It applies to any kind of flu.

Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.

As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies. So they don’t have the flu.

Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”

“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.

The basic flu symptoms—cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness—can be caused by a variety of factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.

—But don’t worry, be happy. Keep your mouth shut and obey all doctors’ orders.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

16 comments on “Explosive: a review of fake medical tests

  1. paschnn1 says:

    The only constant in the “medical field” within this sewer is it’s end result;

    Billions for pharmaceuticals/for profit “healthcare”.

    millions of sick/dead

    Complicit government agencies formed to (LOL) protect the citizens.

    It almost appears to be an intentional and consistant act;


  2. sundancer55 says:

    I’ve never had much faith in “pill doctors or shot doctors” because that’s not how medicine was originally intended to work. I feel the same about all the testing that goes on (started about 30-35 years ago) and now the doctors depend on those stupid tests rather than their own instincts and common sense (you know, the way medicine USED to be when it actually helped people?). No such thing available these days. Doctors are nothing but shills for the medical testing and equipment companies and the phRMA companies. All those people profit in a sort of pyramid scam, so what do they care if people are healthy or sick? They don’t and neither does the FDuh which should long ago have been abandoned.

    Medicine, the way it should be practiced would never make the “industry” enough money so they had to jazz it up. Yep, they jazzed it up to the point where it now kills more people than it helps. FOOD (good food, not GMO crap) is the answer to a lot of medical problems. I have great respect for some surgeries and the emergency medicine available because there are always situations that arise without warning (especially if you have kids). But most young parents don’t have a clue about how to help themselves because they’ve been indoctrinated to believe that only the medical industry can SAVE them. Bull puckey. For instance, how many young people do you know who understand the goodness of a fever? Hell, most old people don’t get that one either. Just keep listening to that tv, blasting ads every 3 minutes, and you’ll be sick before you can say Jack Robinson.

  3. the postman says:

    Hence, no reason to be alarmed about the purported 30 or 40 deaths attributed to the flu this season, IMO. Probably all but two were deaths resulting from something else… and just blamed on the flu in the hopes that a small public panic might just help raise vaccination levels.

  4. Vishva Mitra says:

    Fantastic stuff!!,thank u so much, you are a true worrier !

  5. Nadir Martello says:

    Dear Jon,

    Not directly related to this email. A question – how can I substantiate the claim that the CDC changed the definition of polio in 1955, leading to the quasi-eradication of polio.

    Thank you for all the excellent information.

    Best wishes

    Angela Martello

    • Sue says:

      The following article contains a link to the original “Present Status of Polio Vaccines” report by Dr. Herbert Ratner (published 1960). Very interesting, in looking it over, that it admits both polio and infectious hepatitis were already “in a natural decline” at the time the Salk vaccine was introduced:

      The CDC, polio and the false history of vaccines …

      The following is from “The Vaccine Guide” by Randall Neustaedter:

      Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine’s effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Less cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons. “Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: “Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of nonparalytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart.” Note that “two examinations at least 24 hours apart” was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset…. This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.

    • Sci-reader says:

      Check out the book Dissolving Illusions by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk. Chapter 12 is The “Disappearance” of Polio.

  6. Greg C. says:

    True story – a family member had a chest x-ray which showed a fairly large mass in one lung. Therefore, a biopsy had to be performed – an invasive procedure, which led to sepsis and pneumonia, which in turn killed her in another two weeks. But the irony is that the doctors disagreed on the results of the biopsy! They couldn’t decide from the test what kind of cancer she had. Medical tests often do more harm than they will admit – PET scans (she had one of those too) will bombard the patient with radiation, weakening the immune system. Plus they have to inject sugar into the bloodstream which of course further taxes the physical resources of the patient.

    The medical profession used to rely more on common sense and good judgment, rather than expensive and dangerous technology to make decisions. And now they are introducing Artificial Intelligence into the process, using data mining and statistics so that, overall, they won’t kill too many patients with their procedures and tests. The new Hippocratic oath should be, “First, outsource your thinking.”

  7. Greg C. says:

    Get ready for another vaccine, for a flu-like illness that is not really the flu! The military already gets the vaccine – now they want civilians to get it as well! Vaccines are becoming the human version of Windows Update.


  8. From Quebec says:

    Here is another test that these idiots do. You wont believe it

    David Knight today exposed it. Must watch this:

    REAL NEWS (2nd HOUR) Tue – 1/30/18 • Alex Jones Infowars • News & Analysis

    https://www.youtube.com /watch?v=k88-xRjZRTw

  9. Nunzio says:

    People ask me: “How can you be so healthy, when you haven’t been to a doctor in 40 years?”- I clue them in, that it’s BECAUSE I haven’t been to a doctor in 40 years. Go to a doctor, and they’ll tell you that something’s wrong with you when you’re perfectly healthy, and perish the thought that you should have any complaints about any little thing! You’ll be slated for dangerous procedures and a never-ending regimen of drugs, which WILL cause something to be wrong with you.

    Jon’s first point is exactly what they use also to convince people that they have cancer. Then once they diagnose you with that cancer, they proceed to destroy your immune system, so even if your body was naturally fighting the beginnings of cancer, it will be neutered by the medical-mafia’s intervention, and instead of your body keeping that cancer at bay, it will instead be neutralized and allow it to grow.

  10. nwqfk says:

    My holistic pathologist with her background in microbiology calls this three ring, wild west medicine show, the… ‘TEST FOR allopathic rabbit hole’. Meaning, that the sole purpose of these ‘test for’s is to dupe people into going down the rabbit hole of unnecessary treatments and medications.

    However, you forgot to mention a few other ‘test for’s Jon…

    #SIX Turning normal cholesterol numbers into abnormal numbers. I tell cardiologists that I’m shooting for a 300 cholesterol level just to give them a heart attack.

    … and speaking of heart attacks #SEVEN Turning normal blood pressure into abnormally high blood pressure. The medical savages are now targeting children big time with this one. Yes, blood pressure meds are already on the market for the kiddies.

    #EIGHT Mammograms… A good friend of the family was an old timer doctor for women that they called, in those days, a gynecologist. Now, gynecologist used to be the medical professionals women would go to get their breasts examined for cancer. This, of course, was in the days BEFORE breast cancer exploded.

    When the first mammogram breast cancer testing machines came out, this gynecologist told anyone who would listen, that these mammography machines would create an explosion in breast cancer. Many other doctors like our family friend said the very same thing. They were ignored.

    What ‘they’ don’t dare tell women today, is that in the days before breast cancer exploded, it was not uncommon that some women would get a ‘lump’ in their breast. Back in those days, ‘responsible’ gynecologist would NOT tell women that they had to drop everything and get Chemo. What they also don’t dare tell women is that the great majority of lumps would ‘go away’ and very few women with lumps in the breast, grew aggressively.

    Other important facts today’s doctors don’t tell women, is that you must never rupture the lump in the breast so that it won’t metastasis. Mammograms are ‘purposely designed’ to rupture lumps so that they can tell women that the cancer “is spreading”. Cancer cells like certain doses of radiation and the mammography machine gives the gift of radiation that the old time gynecologist never gave their patient. If it was me, I would turn back the clock and see a holistic gynecologist instead of going down the pink ribbon chemo ‘test for’ rabbit hole.

  11. thanks Jon R. says:

    I havn’t had so much as a common cold in 30+ years which coincides with the period that I put the television in the dumpster.

    Just sayin.

  12. Raleigh W says:

    I had a friend who was diagnosed with a PSA of 22. Only problem was his prostate had been removed over a year earlier. After $20,000 of medical tests frantically searching for cancer that turned up negative they asked him what was he taking. I had given him a home brew probiotic which he loved and never felt better. After the doctors asked him to stop taking his PSA dropped back below 1. I think the PSA tests are measuring a body’s healing activity and as I understand now are highly unreliable for the determination of cancer.

  13. Michele S. Coleman says:

    I can totally relate! I have been disabled for 29-years because of doctors, surgeons & technicians & lies & corrupt tests. I’ve been BED-RIDDEN for the last 13-years, and I’m only 54. I was 25 & pregnant when this started. I ALSO have Lymes disease, big bullseye rash and all, but a negative test unless you can afford the right test that insurance doesn’t cover, ETC.. Much more.. .. .. .. ..
    I don’t read email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *