Big Pharma’s control over the news

Big Pharma’s control over the news

by Jon Rappoport

December 15, 2017

Over the last 11 months, pharmaceutical companies have spent a stunning $3.2 billion on TV ads for drugs.

That much money buys you influence. It buys you control.

If a major network suddenly decided to set its hounds loose and investigate the overall devastating effects of medical drugs on the public, there would be hell to pay at the network. Drug companies wouldn’t stand for it.

Robert F Kennedy, Jr., whose film, Trace Amounts, about toxic mercury in vaccines, was getting no media coverage, made this comment:

“I talked to Roger Ailes [then CEO of FOX News], who I have known since I was 17 years old, he’s very sympathetic with this issue and saw the film Trace Amounts. I said to him, ‘I just want to go on one of your shows. Nobody will allow me to talk about this or debate me.’ He said to me, ‘I can’t allow you on any of them. I’d have to fire any of my hosts that allowed you on my station.’ Because he said, ‘My news division gets up to 70% of advertising revenues during non-election years from the pharmaceutical companies’.”

That’s called control.

There is a wider sphere to consider. Through octopus foundations like Rockefeller and Gates, for example, the medical/pharma agenda is part and parcel of the Globalist agenda. That is key. Gathering in the world population under the umbrella of “humanitarian health care” is a covert op of the highest order.

How can you control billions of people, erase national borders, destroy untold numbers of communities and their traditions, wage senseless wars, send millions of jobs out of industrial countries to Third World backwaters, and build a de facto global management system—unless you can also debilitate, weaken, confuse, toxify, and thus pacify those billions of people?

Accomplishing this is the work of the pharmaceutical empire.

I have produced, many times, open-source mainstream reviews of the death and damage numbers wrought by “Rockefeller medicine.” In the US, 106,000 deaths every year from government-approved medicines. In the US and Europe, 330,000 die, every year, from correctly prescribed drugs. 6.6 million hospitalizations occur. 80 million adverse effects occur. These are conservative estimates.

So…what is the likelihood that pharma-controlled mainstream news will dig deeply into the issue of Globalism, the major tyrannical movement of our time?

The likelihood is zero.

The influence of pharmaceutical interests on the news is, therefore, much greater than most people can fathom, in their wildest dreams.

Most people, when confronted with these pharmaceutical death-and-destruction reports, will immediately dismiss them as impossible. Others, who accept the reports, will claim the “unfortunate” facts show no intention to harm whatsoever.

However, the reports are public knowledge. They’ve been available to one and all. Government officials—and particularly, pharma princes—know the truth. And they’re doing nothing about it.

This is called a clue.

If you were in charge of a juggernaut operation that was causing this much horrific damage, and you knew it, would you stand by and let it keep happening? Would you foster the development of new drugs whose effects would only add to the ongoing tragedy? And would you exert such powerful control over major media that the truth could not be told?

I didn’t think so.

The pharma princes are not like you. You can’t see who they are if you look through the lens of your morality. They don’t share that morality. They don’t resemble you. Don’t ascribe your qualities to them. They don’t respond to life as you do. Their capacity for self-deception is awesome. Your good is not their good.

It is as if they were born freezing and never recovered. They come from an Ice Age and their blood is still cold.

They are rigid robots. Muscular truth can take them down.


(New piece up at my OUTSIDE THE REALITY MACHINE blog entitled
“Crazy sh*t coming out of nowhere”)


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

25 comments on “Big Pharma’s control over the news

  1. Eliza Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal and commented:
    The key is, Big Pharma is part of the globalist agenda.

  2. robertwachsmuth says:

    You’ll never see on TV the millions of babies being murdered every year and their body parts SOLD for profit.

    Merida Health Care system.
    Modern-day cannibalism

    • Alexis Keiser says:

      I think Tucker Carlson talked about it a little on one of his shows. He spoke to a woman who used to work at Planned Parenthood. Horrific. And yes, the bodies were sold. Tucker Carlson also did a piece on vaccines that began to communicate a bit of the devastation, discussing African children who where 10x more likely to die after DPT, I believe. RFK junior has a short video available through World Mercury Project that also talks about the African vaccine devastation.

  3. robertwachsmuth says:

    MURDER MURDER
    HEALTH CARE

  4. katykat says:

    This is not caused by just the satanic globalists. Americans rationalize and compromise on their ethics so that they can have the best toys, cars and houses, etc. As with all great lies, someone has to pay for all this. The military, industrial, financial and medical
    / pharmaceutical complex has decided to sell our our youth, big time.

  5. Laina Eartharcher says:

    This post ????????????????????????

  6. paschnn1 says:

    Great and revealing as usual.
    It’s really amazing how sophisticated a culture can be in some areas and ignorant in others.

    One word pretty much covers why;

    kosher.

    Kosher owned pharma

    kosher owned media

    kosher owned branches of “government”

    Am I “antisemitic”? no.

    Am I politically incorrect? yup.

    Will the majority of people look upon history as objectively
    as they DON’T look upon “facts” gleaned from the (lol) kosher media? Nope.

    Will anyone even READ the article that shows whom is behind it and why? Nope

    The game’s almost on and their team might make it to the playoffs.

    http://theevilofzionismexposedbyjews.weebly.com/13-what-zionist-and-anti-zionist-jews-have-said-about-medical-practices.html

    […]

  7. An attempt at creating a trans-national narco state. Attempt. Trump was never in their plans. Control freaks always think they have control. Plus their science is very, very reductionist. It has been said that neuroleptics cause “permanent brain damage”. That could be the case if someone has been on them for decades. But consciousness is not based on linear neuronal connections alone. I’ve seen evidence that cells and neuronal cell walls have a liquid crystal structure, as well as connections between different brain regions being “non-local”. Information transfer happens over large distances through liquid crystal resonance and other effects …

    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=227#p2556

    https://phys.org/news/2008-01-genetic-telepathy-bizarre-property-dna.html

    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/thuo-eso022808.php

    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=227&start=30#p10547

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080621215854/http://www.bcs.org.uk/siggroup/cyber/dna.htm

    http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=227&start=60#p25919

    “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
    Than are dreamt of in your philosophy”.

    I don’t want to downplay the seriousness of the Pharma disaster but even “mental health rights campaigners” fail to pull the rabbit out the hat and repeat gems like “causes permanent brain damage” ad infinitum.

    Again, not to downplay the seriousness of the Pharma influence on news. But suppressed info get’s transmitted by other means. For example look at the Deus Ex series of video games

    • Alexis Keiser says:

      I think you are right about this. I had two “psychotic breaks”. One was really bad. Left me in dread and wanting to die. I was in a horrible state for a period of years. Something has definitely happened to me despite being on up to 4 “psychotropic” drugs at a time. I don’t take anything now. Psychosis is bad when it makes the “psychotic” miserable, but I think there is adaptive even divine significance to it. I had previously noticed that psychotics seemed aware of spiritual things. One aspect of psychosis is seeing things that “aren’t there” and believing things are connected in ways that other people don’t think are based in reality. Just as I was “losing it” the second time I began to feel I was living more in an unseen reality. I don’t deny the existence of that eternal, timeless reality. It seems to me I live in both, but am more connected “outside” now.

      • paschnn1 says:

        I completely sympathize and understand. Back before “sliced bread”, (early ’70’s), I had a breakdown caused by financial concerns during the phony “gas shortage” almost immediately after the creation of the “petro dollar”.

        I was a union man and was laid off for months. I can recall “seeing things” and “hearing things” as you did. Back then, T.V. in my area only broadcast until about midnight on Sundays and once I lost that to keep my mind occupied, I had some very, difficult times.

        I was never comfortable with the “healthcare” industry so I went to a holistic doctor treating my mother’s cancer, he took one look at me and asked if I was under a lot of stress lately, I explained my disdain for “safe” pharmaceuticals and my desperate need of undisturbed sleep. He put me on vitamin “F” and bone meal and I began sleeping again.

        Slowly, over weeks, I was able to clear my head and put all things in perspective. Oddly, once I realized the very worst thing that could happen to me was dying which would end the misery/terror, I began calming down, didn’t worry as much and slowly, over about a year, finally was able to put it into the “memory hole”.

        Knowing what you went through, my heart goes out to you. Hang in there, it’ll get better.

      • Aka Dr. Evie says:

        Where you say “despite” the drugs someone said you should take, it might be better said as “because of” those drugs. They can cause emotional and belief states, during and after taking them, that are so outside of normal (and horrific) that they cannot be described. Erowid has some stories by people who took haloperidol (Haldol) in attempts to enjoy it recreationally. I don’t recall any positive ones. Drugs.com’s user reviews tell the stories of those prescribed the drug or whose loved ones were. Not pretty.

  8. Here’s A Taste OF Life In Big Pharma Run America…Who Do You Really Think Is the Big Guns Behind The Killing Of Net Neutrality?

    Ric A Ohge Aka Rex Posted On Google+ 12/14/17

    Alternative Media [We Critically Thinking “Conspiracy Theorists” Purveying AND Posting “Fake News”] Are Panning Their Prescriptions, Outing Their Corruption, Outing Vaccines, Promoting Healthy Food, Herbs, And Natural Cures, Promoting Cannabis, Exposing Their Tricks And Leading People Away From Their Influence By Opening Up And Promoting New Forms Of INDEPENDENT Information, News And Entertainment Media On The Web They Can’t Load With Their Omnipresent Commercial Assault Of Cigarette Science Lies.

    Big Ag Monsanto And Bff’s]Own The Majority Of Companies That Produce Organic Foods, So THEY Win Either Way That Wind Of Fortune Blows…Banks Get Money From Doing ANY Business, Wall Street Gains From ANY Investment-And Tax Reduction Doesn’t Matter To Any Of Them, As They Continue To Send It All Off-Shore Mostly Unchallenged.

    But If People Get Well, Eat Healthy, And Heal Naturally, THEY STAND TO Lose BIG TIME…And Where Do YOU Think Folks Have LEARNED HOW TO DO All THAT?

    Just Saying…

    THINK ABOUT IT.

  9. Wonderer says:

    When you’ve gone beyond “false hope”, beyond fully loaded chambers of “Russian roulette” of side effects….then you’re in the COLD BLOODED land of MURDER OR MANSLAUGHTER…what differentiates the two? INTENT!!!!

    Best article I’ve read so far…but don’t forget the (((NWO))) is the ***GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE OF THE 4TH REICH***…the ***GLOBAL GRID of 10 EYES*** will also by DNA enforced ***databases*** put into place the ULTIMATE “C”ontrol…***BIOmetric/BIOlogic***…did you really think the ***RED CULT*** would not find a new ***SCIENCE AS SOLUTIONss***… WATHCH “Science and the Swastika”…

  10. Chris Hickey says:

    I remember when pharmaceuticals began to be advertised on TV and I could see the evil behind it and so it has come to total fruition. Only psychopaths could implement such evil. Oh, the horrifying consequences…and most people have no idea. When told the truth, I have yet to have anyone believe me. It is so monstrous and most can not comprehend the depth and scope of such evil.

  11. ginger says:

    during tobacco lawsuits of the 1990′ a secret document from 1970′ came to light.

    there, goeffrey bible, then ceo of philip morris in australia, who became ceo worldwide, planed to buy all the media in order to manipulate the public to contain health movements.

    now, think about it, disney owns abc “news”. when was the last time you saw a report on cruise lines dumping all the waste straight to sea?

  12. Satanists Rule The World says:

    The pharma princes actually think what they are doing is hilarious.

    According to Del Bigtree, at ACIP (the CDC’s board that votes on whether vaccines go on the childhood schedule), they actually giggle and laugh when approving new vaccines that they know have no evidence of safety or effectiveness.

    “We didn’t even have enough cohorts for this study, but we’re going to approve it anyway.”

    “AHAHAHA!”

    At the one three or four weeks ago, they wanted to add a third MMR vaccine to the schedule, because of the huge mumps outbreaks occurring in populations that are already about 95% fully vaccinated against mumps.

    No one asked, “Is it possible this mumps vaccine isn’t working at all?” No. All they wanted to do was add a third one.

    “Well, there’s really been no studies about what a third MMR vaccine would do, so we really had to search the dark corners for every little drop of evidence that this would work, but we used computer models, and you know how good they are!”

    “AHAHAHA!”

    “Approved!”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIdHC7FZfB4

  13. jacobite2015 says:

    Great post as usual.

    With such a huge demand for pharmaceuticals I can see why Big Pharma spends so much dough for TV ads. People want medical drugs! I think you mentioned in a previous post Jon that people taking a multitude of medical drugs wear it like a “badge of honor.” I’m in my middle-age and that is true with so many people in my age demographics. Many of the middle-age and older are so reliant on the meds they take and implicitly trust their doctor (s) that they would take rat poison if they were told it would improve their symptoms.

    And people don’t research medical drugs or medical procedures hardly anymore. A plethora of Industry-funding safety studies & buried studies on so many popular drugs that people would be stunned that some of this stuff actually gets approved by the FDA (who would have thought. Lol). And our trusted physicians? They are aware of the publication bias of the industry-funded studies published in the journals and most, IMO, simply don’t care. But I guess why would they if so many people demand the drugs anyway. And the drugs simply treat the symptoms making people more reluctant in making any dietary & lifestyle changes that might improve their condition.
    .
    Granted there are trauma situations from accidents & degenerative joint ailments that might necessitate medical drugs for the short term (I was hit & injured by a careless driver and required NSAIDs/pain meds for several musculoskeletal injuries). However, many other other chronic ailments (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, acid reflux, obesity-related diseases, etc.) can be prevented with regular excercise, healthy organic food, dietary supplements, etc. But sadly many of the population are at all not interested (as we’ve become a very sedentary society with poor eating habits) and demand medical intervention & pharmaceuticals. And Big Pharma is all too willing to oblige laughing all the way to the bank. That’s why you’ll never see a poor Big Pharma sales rep.????

  14. Jean says:

    Wherever there is big money…you’ll almost always find corruption and evil.
    All that money isn’t gonna help them on Judgment Day…

  15. Aka Dr. Evie says:

    A modest change to drug ads would improve public health. At present a narrator extols the drugs and then lists the adverse events they have caused. The entire time, the visual imagery is positive and uplifting. At least for the adverse events portion of the ad, the visuals should depict the adverse events. Rash? A Stevens-Johnson Syndrome patient. Sudden death? A real grieving husband and three toddlers. Etc.

    I wonder if the law that requires the statements of adverse events doesn’t already require this, without saying so explicitly. That is, if the ads are required to present adverse events, it can be assumed that “as convincingly as alleged benefits are presented” was intended. Keeping the visuals positive almost certainly renders the narration of adverse effects ineffective.

    But it’s entirely possible that the law specifically states that the narration, not the ad as a whole, has to present the dark side. I guess that’s pretty likely…got some research to do.

    In addition, 50% of the time a drug ad runs, it should lead with the negatives.

    Call me a dreamer.

  16. Jon: Thank you for a great blog. My poor husband is just shy of his 74th birthday and his medicine cabinet is filled with pills and pain killers from the multiple specialists he goes to for his multiple chronic conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis which so far is uncontrollable. He uses a walker, a cane, and for long distances, a wheelchair. I for one refuse to see any doctor except my dentist and a dermatologist who says she herself undergoes no procedure unless obviously a medical necessity. My eye doctor did lasik on me years ago while another eye doctor told me that eventually some of the benefit of lazik will reverse in time. Nothing can be done for old-age eyes. Now, I take no pill, see no doctor, Have never had a wellness check ( too afraid some MD will treat me for some bogus condition), and if I die a few years early, that OK. I will have lived life free from the Pharma-Doctor duo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *