Fake evidence used in the Oklahoma Bombing

How official “science” is deployed to advance a political agenda

by Jon Rappoport

August 21, 2017

(To join our email list, click here.)

The public wants to buy every official scientific claim the mainstream press pounds into their brains—whether the issue is vaccine safety, global warming, the “overwhelming success” of medical drugs, the Big Bang theory of the universe’s origin…

For most people, the notion that a political agenda underlies such scientific pronouncements is unthinkable.

So as an example, a very specific example of fake science, let’s look back at the attack on Oklahoma City.

On April 19, 1995, one-third of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City blew up, killing 169 people and wounding 680 others.

Three men were arrested and convicted: Tim McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Michael Fortier. McVeigh was put to death on June 11, 2001, Nichols is currently serving multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole, and Fortier was sentenced to 12 years (he served that term and was released).

The official narrative of the bombing stated: A Ryder truck parked at the curb outside the Murrah Building contained barrels of ammonium nitrate plus fuel oil (ANFO bombs), and their coordinated explosion occurred shortly after 9AM on the morning of April 19th.

In addition to the deaths and the woundings, the explosion impacted 324 buildings and 86 cars in the area.

(In my 1995, book, “The Oklahoma City Bombing, the Suppressed Truth,” I laid to rest the claim that ANFO bombs could have caused that much damage; and more importantly, I showed that an explosion coming out of a Ryder truck at the curb could not have caused the particular profile of damage sustained by the Murrah Building.)

The vaunted FBI lab decided that, indeed, all the damage and death HAD been caused by ANFO bombs in the Ryder truck.

But wait.

Buckle up.

Two years after the bombing, on March 22, 1997, we had this from CNN: “The Justice Department inspector general’s office has determined that the FBI crime laboratory working on the Oklahoma City bombing case made ‘scientifically unsound’ conclusions that were ‘biased in favor of the prosecution,’ The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.”

“…[FBI] supervisors approved lab reports that they ‘cannot support’ and…FBI lab officials may have erred about the size of the blast, the amount of explosives involved and the type of explosives used in the bombing[!].”

“…harshest criticism was of David Williams, a supervisory agent in the [FBI] explosives unit, the paper [LA Times] said. Those flaws reportedly include the basis of his determination that the main charge of the explosion was ammonium nitrate. The inspector general called such a determination ‘inappropriate,’ the Times said.”

“…FBI officials found a receipt for ammonium nitrate at defendant [Terry] Nichols’ home and, because of that discovery, Williams slanted his conclusion to match the evidence.”

And with those revelations, the case, the investigation, the court trials, and press probes should have taken a whole new direction. But they didn’t.

The fake science was allowed to stand.

Therefore, other paths of investigation were abandoned. If bombs did, in fact, explode in the Ryder truck, but didn’t cause the major damage, then those bombs were a cover for other explosions of separate origin—for example, charges wired inside the columns of the Murrah Building, triggered at the exact moment the Ryder Truck explosion occurred.

Now we would be talking about a very sophisticated operation, far beyond the technical skills of McVeigh, Nichols, and Fortier.

Who knows where an honest in-depth investigation would have led? The whole idea of anti-government militia terrorism in the OKC attack—symbolized by McVeigh—was used by President Bill Clinton to bring the frightened public “back to the federal government” as their ultimate protector and savior.

Instead, the public might have been treated to a true story about a false flag operation, in which case President Clinton’s massaged message would never have been delivered.

But the fake crooked science pushed by the FBI lab was permitted to stand—despite exposure as fraud—and the story of militia terrorists trying to bring down the federal government was allowed to stand as well.

The year 1995 was rife with anti-government sentiment in America. This wasn’t merely a bunch of militias talking about insurrection. This was widespread dissatisfaction, on the part of many Americans, who were seeing federal power expand beyond any semblance of constitutionality.

As an object lesson, the Oklahoma Bombing was: “You see what happens when crazy people are allowed to own guns and oppose the government? Stop listening to anti-government rhetoric. It’s horribly dangerous. We, the government, are here to protect you. Come home to us. Have faith in us. We’ll punish the offenders. We’ll make America safe again. Let’s all come together and oppose these maniacs who want to destroy our way of life…”

The lesson worked.

Many scared Americans signed on to Clinton’s agenda.

And fake FBI science was used to bolster that agenda.

Even when exposed as fake by mainstream press outlets—however briefly, with no determined follow-up—the federal brainwashing held. The myth was stronger than reality.

If the federal government can egregiously lie about an event as huge as the Oklahoma Bombing, using fake science as a cover—what wouldn’t they lie about?

That’s a question which answers itself.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

16 comments on “Fake evidence used in the Oklahoma Bombing

  1. Eliza Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal and commented:
    Acts of terror are directed to obtain the compliance of the public to the globalist agenda. It has worked in the past. Will you let it work now? Wake up.

    • Nolan Parker says:

      Terry Yeaky, cop of the year, was there. He saw enough to know it was a lie. He had evidence and was trying to get it to someone. But, he decided to kill himself on the way. His widow was terrorized into silence. The Dumbmasses fail to see what is so obvious.
      A bomb in the parking lot blows away from itself. The building face fell. Larger columns further from the blast fell while smaller ones nearer stood. Bombs were found inside. Remember the bomb squad and the trailer with the reinforced kettle shaped container?

  2. jmilamdeal says:

    Was this perhaps a precursor to the Twin Towers coming down in demolition style, a test run, so to speak?

  3. Dan Quixoté says:

    Thanks for posting on that bombshell – that the ANFO bomb narrative, any findings about the blast at all – were openly admitted by the FBI itself to be a complete and utter fabrication.

    Best OKC documentary I’ve seen is James Corbett’s 20th anniversary one from 2015, although it didn’t include the 1997 FBI admission that the bomb findings were totally falsified.


  4. Dan Quixoté says:

    Here’s the link to the original LA Times article, still posted:

    “FBI Issued Flawed Bombing Analysis, U.S. Probe Finds; Law enforcement: Lab’s ‘unsound’ conclusions favor prosecutors in Oklahoma City trial, draft report states. ”


    And it took an internal whistleblower a year to get this probe done at all.

  5. Jennifer says:

    I can still remember the morning in 2003 when Delamer Duverus woke me to tell me that the Mormon Hierarchy gained control of the FBI in 1953. The statement brought us out of our sleep so fast, and we thought we had never heard this conspiracy before and we had been around for a while, 1953 being the year of our birth. How can this be true? we asked Him.

    He told us to Google it, and sure enough we found that J. Edgar Hoover liked to hire Mormons because he thought he could trust them, (perhaps their blood oath thingy) and there was a lawsuit brought by non-Mormon FBI agents against the Bureau because they felt they were being overlooked for promotions which were always going to Mormon agents. Then we read that Brigham Young University liked to hire agents from the college, and that may be perhaps because their missions brought something to their employment. Then we met this Mormon woman whose husband was in law enforcement and she told us he was encouraged to get into police work. And, it was also Delamer Diverus who told us there was little difference between the CIA and the FBI. Did that mean they were both under the Mormon Hierarchy and does this mean the Heirarchy is in control of the police state? Don’t some of their members own private prison companies, too?

    It’s all very curious.

  6. Hitler Lurks Around Every Corner! says:

    But the Great American Eclipse.
    Can’t we all just get along.
    We’ll get back to Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, shortly.
    Next on the History Channel inside Hitler’s sock drawer.
    A few mismatched socks have recently been discovered!
    Tune in you Nazi heretic confederate kulak untermenschen Trumpsführer-SS waycis bigot!

  7. From Quebec says:

    Who let the US agencies to become so corrupted?
    Was everybody asleep or what?

    Edmund Burke once said:
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

    Yes, like do not vote, do not run for congress or senate. Watch MSM fake news, do not get involved, just live for yourself and fuck all the rest.

  8. bob klinck says:

    “What wouldn’t they lie about?” There is ample evidence that they lie about everything. This is because they do not have truth as a reference point, only spin designed to elicit calculated reactions among the public.

  9. truth1 says:

    It was wither the History channel or Discovery channel that did a recreation of the truck and fertilizer and set it off. It left a crater in the ground and mangled the back axle. Where was the crater in Oklahoma? the axle was found in good condition a 2 or 3 blocks away. It was placed there. This was a false flag set up. All lies just like the recent Charlottesville. None of those groups were real. All actors playing parts. I have a DVD of local Oklahoma city TV stations reporting. There were reports on site of multiple bombs, some of which had not gone off and several that had. What they report was much different than the national news.

  10. You missed some vital information here, Jon.

    In that fashion, you exacerbate the “conspiracy” (if you will). McVeigh was not executed for the Oklahoma bombing. He was executed for daring to [vainly] try and take on the authorities. He, the 1st gulf war veteran noted many of his buddies were dead or dying of medications foisted on them by the military. He was the first “whistle blower” and after the Oklahoma authorities rejected him he foolishly went in with bombs (enough to “break a few windows”, I’m reliably informed).

    I, for one, would be more than grateful if you would shed some more light on that whole murky situation (what did “they” call it – the “template for 9/11”?)


  11. Juan Redpill says:

    I remember watching TV that day and saw several men in black suits carrying something in their hands. The reporter congratulated the FBI for finding and removing unexploded bombs. Never saw that again.
    When the truck bomb theory first appeared I was incredulous. The force of a bomb in a truck parked in the street would obviously take the path of least resistance and dissipate into the surrounding air. It would be impossible to carve out a giant area of the structure with nothing to direct it.
    Funny how many people were fooled.

    • Juan Redpill says:

      No explanation was given as to how they managed to arrive so soon after the event occurred and quickly locate the devices without rumpling their suits.

  12. From Quebec says:

    Donald Trump:
    “My primary consultant is myself.” (MSNBC, 2016)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *