The psychiatric agenda destroys creative children
by Jon Rappoport
June 23, 2017
“Take a child who wants to invent something out of thin air, and instead of saying no, tell him he has a problem with his brain, and then stand back and watch what happens. In particular, watch what happens when you give him a toxic drug to fix his brain. You have to be a certain kind of person to do that to a child. You have to be, for various reasons, crazy and a career criminal.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
First, here are a few facts that should give you pause:
According to NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness), “More than 25 percent of college students have been diagnosed or treated by a professional for a mental health condition within the past year.”
NAMI: “One in four young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 have [we claim] a diagnosable mental illness.”
According to healthline.com, 6.4 million American children between the ages of 4 and 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD. The average age for the child’s diagnosis is 7.
BMJ 2016;352:i1457: “The number of UK children and adolescents treated with antidepressants rose by over 50% from 2005 to 2012, a study of five Western countries published in European Neuropsychopharmacology has found.”
Getting the picture?
Children are being diagnosed and dosed with toxic drugs at a staggering rate.
But, as I have shown in many past articles, NO so-called mental disorder is based on a lab test. No blood, saliva, genetic, brain test. ALL 300 or so official mental disorders are defined by menus of behaviors concocted by committees of psychiatrists.
On that foundation, the diagnoses and the drugs are handed out.
Let’s look at just one of the drugs: Ritalin (or any similar ADHD medicine). After a creative child is seen fidgeting in class, looking bored, studying what he wants to study, ignoring classroom assignments, focusing on what interests him, he is diagnosed with ADHD. Then comes the drug.
In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published an important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called “An Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)” [v.21(7), pp. 837-841].
Scarnati listed a large number of adverse effects of Ritalin and cited published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.
For every one of the following (selected and quoted verbatim) Ritalin effects, there is at least one confirming source in the medical literature:
* Paranoid delusions
* Paranoid psychosis
* Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
* Activation of psychotic symptoms
* Toxic psychosis
* Visual hallucinations
* Auditory hallucinations
* Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
* Effects pathological thought processes
* Extreme withdrawal
* Terrified affect
* Started screaming
* Aggressiveness
* Insomnia
* Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect amphetamine-like effects
* Psychic dependence
* High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
* Decreased REM sleep
* When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
* Convulsions
* Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.
Under this chemical assault on the brain, what are the chances that a creative child will go on in life to become an innovator, rather than a victim of psychiatric drugging?
Make a list of your favorite innovators. Imagine them as bored distracted children sitting in classrooms…and then diagnosed, and then hammered with drugs prescribed by a doctor.
This is happening now.
The institution of psychiatry is making it happen.
What about the consequences of diagnosing clinical depression in larger numbers of young children? What about the antidepressant drugs?
Here is just a sprinkling of information about antidepressants, from a huge body of literature:
Psychiatrist Peter Breggin: February 1990 American Journal of Psychiatry (Teicher et al, v.147:207-210) reports on “six depressed patients, previously free of recent suicidal ideation, who developed `intense, violent suicidal preoccupations after 2-7 weeks of fluoxetine [Prozac] treatment.’ The suicidal preoccupations lasted from three days to three months after termination of the treatment. The report estimates that 3.5 percent of Prozac users were at risk. While denying the validity of the study, Dista Products, a division of Eli Lilly, put out a brochure for doctors dated August 31, 1990, stating that it was adding `suicidal ideation’ to the adverse events section of its Prozac product information.”
An earlier study, from the September 1989 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, by Joseph Lipiniski, Jr., indicates that in five examined cases people on Prozac developed what is called akathesia. Symptoms include intense anxiety, inability to sleep, the “jerking of extremities,” and “bicycling in bed or just turning around and around.” Dr. Peter Breggin comments that akathesia “may also contribute to the drug’s tendency to cause self-destructive or violent tendencies … Akathesia can become the equivalent of biochemical torture and could possibly tip someone over the edge into self-destructive or violent behavior … The June 1990 Health Newsletter, produced by the Public Citizen Research Group, reports, ‘Akathesia, or symptoms of restlessness, constant pacing, and purposeless movements of the feet and legs, may occur in 10-25 percent of patients on Prozac.’”
The well-known publication, California Lawyer, in a December 1998 article called “Protecting Prozac,” details some of the suspect maneuvers of Eli Lilly in its handling of suits against Prozac. California Lawyer also mentions other highly qualified critics of the drug: “David Healy, MD, an internationally renowned psychopharmacologist, has stated in sworn deposition that `contrary to Lilly’s view, there is a plausible cause-and-effect relationship between Prozac’ and suicidal-homicidal events. An epidemiological study published in 1995 by the British Medical Journal also links Prozac to increased suicide risk.”
When pressed, proponents of these SSRI antidepressant drugs (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, etc.) sometimes say, “Well, the benefits for the general population far outweigh the risk.” But the issue of benefits will not go away on that basis. A shocking review-study published in The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases (1996, v.184, no.2), written by Rhoda L. Fisher and Seymour Fisher, called “Antidepressants for Children,” concludes: “Despite unanimous literature of double-blind studies indicating that antidepressants are no more effective than placebos in treating depression in children and adolescents, such medications continue to be in wide use.”
In wide use. This despite such contrary information and the negative, dangerous effects of these drugs.
There are other studies: “Emergence of self-destructive phenomena in children and adolescents during fluoxetine treatment,” published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1991, vol.30), written by RA King, RA Riddle, et al. It reports self-destructive phenomena in 14% (6/42) of children and adolescents (10-17 years old) who had treatment with fluoxetine (Prozac) for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
July, 1991. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Hisako Koizumi, MD, describes a thirteen-year-old boy who was on Prozac: “full of energy,” “hyperactive,” “clown-like.” All this devolved into sudden violent actions which were “totally unlike him.”
September, 1991. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Author Laurence Jerome reports the case of a ten-year old who moves with his family to a new location. Becoming depressed, the boy is put on Prozac by a doctor. The boy is then “hyperactive, agitated … irritable.” He makes a “somewhat grandiose assessment of his own abilities.” Then he calls a stranger on the phone and says he is going to kill him. The Prozac is stopped, and the symptoms disappear.
For money, for profit, for status, for control, there exists a professional class called psychiatrists. They approach children—particularly creative children who refuse to fall into lock-step with a regimented program of learning—as outliers, as ill, as strange, as maladjusted, as threats to the system. And this professional class takes action. Diagnose the children, drug them, bring them back into line, make them “normal,” reduce their curiosity and independence and drive and will power.
Instead of using overt physical force, they use relatively invisible chemical force.
Under the banner of caring, they perform, on the young, a scientific ritual of sacrifice, a rite of passage into the dead world where they, the elite rulers, exist.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
What is happening to our children as well as the adults who take these drugs is dissimulation defined as a process by which the Pineal Gland is blocked by a chemical substance, thus severing us from God’s counsel and protection, which we know as our conscience, or Speciel Mind’s counseling of us, and which allows other minds to gain access to ours, which we may or may not be able to differentiate from our own mind. Substances which can dissimulate are fluoride and drugs of abuse, and many of these drugs like Prozac and Zoloft contain fluoride. So does Tamiflu, Chantix, Singulair, the fluoroquinolone antibiotics and pain medications, which have caused the takers to try to kill themselves.
These people who encourage giving these drugs to children and who make them all need Millstone Straps. Matthew 18:6
Parents must refuse these toxic poisons.
Children deserve a childhood and an education that encourages, supports and nurtures their creativity.
Sadly, this means homeschooling which is very hard for working parents.
Cut off the psych. profession at its knees, by passing a law that makes diagnosis without lab tests an act of fraud. So simple.
I have been following many of Polly Tommy’s interviews on the Vaxxed bus. It seems that one of the many side effects of vaccination is anxiety. Until we stop vaccinating, our children will continue to have difficulties– both physical and mental, for which anguished parents take decisions–many good and many very, very bad, to help them. As a mother of vaccine injured children I can understand how the day to day difficulties of dealing with this damage (on top of the guilt once you realize what you have willingly inflicted upon your poor child) can lead parents to make bad decisions. The same crew that bullied you into vaccination is then leading you down the path of medication. I don’t know if you know the work of Dr. Kelly Brogan–she is an excellent psychiatrist who has written about the false assumptions of the field and the dangerous side effects of psychiatric medicine. She is also anti-vaccination. I highly recommend her book, “A Mind of Your Own”.
http://www.vaxxed.com/tour-dates/
The average American teenager is on 1.1 psych drugs right now.
As Dr Julian Whitaker said, if you look at the biographies of Mozart, Beethoven and many other great composers, ALL of them would have been diagnosed with multiple “mental illnesses” if they were alive today and then drugged out of their minds, never writing any of their great music as the compliant, “normal” zombies they would have become, before dying an average of 25 years earlier than today’s average if they copped neuroleptic (“antipsychotic”) drugs. But a psychiatric diagnosis is a “fabricated illness”, he said.
I remember reading about a psychiatrist saying that if only Handel had been alive now, he could have been “helped” with drugs because he was obviously bipolar. Then he would never have written The Messiah:
https://holysheepdip.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/handel-wrote-messiah-in-a-24-day-manic-episode/
“It’s Satanic” said Whitaker.
Ever met a normal psyche hater? The losers that hoped to turn their academically induced psychopathy into a science? If I am honest, I have met some peculiar specimens. But i can’t talk to them, the wires get into a knot.
It starts with the teachers. Most teachers are brainwashed to believe ADHD is real and should be treated. Schools used to get subsidies for this diagnosis, so now it’s been mainstreamed. The teachers have a meeting with the parents and a counselor with a list of gripes and recorded behaviors involving the child. The councilor has a packet already prepared to give the parents. It contains 2 sheets, one for the parents and one for the child’s doctor. Instructions tell you to rate you child for the behaviors listed on the sheet.
At this point, as a parent, you have a few choices.
1. Ignore the whole thing and throw the papers away (you will be hounded by teachers for years), or
2. Check all the right boxes because you want to be compliant because you believe ADHD is a real thing and modern drugs are wonderful, or
3. See you child’s doctor to tell him your child has troubling behavioral issues only in school caused by extreme anxiety, so you are going to move your child to a different school or class or homeschool, ask the doc if he agrees (which he will if he knows you and your child well enough) and you want that fact to be recorded in his or her medical records.
We chose number 3 and haven’t regretted it.
And Then there are the families that WANT to get diagnosed with a mental illness (preferably ADHD which supposedly runs in families) so they can all be prescribed amphetamines. Helps the parents feel better to have an excuse for their kids behavior, gets the teachers off their backs, and the parents just feel good because, well, they are taking amphetamines too.
While science may have led us out of the dark ages once, it’s now leading us into a new dark ages, because science now follows money.
This is what I thought !! We are in dark ages.
I cannot understand why nobody in the psychiatry community starts looking at what a young child really needs. It´s little but basic: having a loving parent around the house.
Nowadays both parents work for a boss; they spend their best energy and precious time on money making. Parents who are tired after a day’s work are more willing to accept anything the school nurse comes up with. It’s a shame! We have to turn around this situation. We have to avoid daycare to start with. It makes children nervous and gives them a feeling of being ‘disposable’ – there are so many kids around and the daycare worker doesn’t have the sense of bonding with the individual kid. I know it cannot be done in two days, but we have to change our way of living and spend our best time and energy on our children.
Big Pharma is ‘poisening the well’ so to speak and we have to defend our future generations by being present !!
Earth’s ruling Demonic Warlords are the ultimate Luddites, as all the required ‘inventions’ necessary for their Dystopia have been created, the patents stolen and the zombie/robot manufacturing is in place. Allowing ‘creativity’ would allow uncontrolled developments.
How out of touch must parents be if using critical thinking not to see thru this scam and harm to their own flesh and blood…
the parents were damaged as well.
I grew up with ADHD without knowing what it was that was affecting me. It was a rough road, but I tought myself concentration techniques that ended up working, though it was a struggle to make it though school. This article and many other anti drug ones have absolutely NO idea what the aflitction is, or involves. Biolobically some of us inherite it, and its nicknamed the ‘warrior gene’ because we are awair of everything….rather than concentrating on any one thing. The brain essentially gets drowneded in information. With no , or very little ‘stop button’ control to our behavior, impulsive and often to a dangerous extent. Yes, all go and no stop. That is why amphetamines are sometimes prescribed to ADHD afflicted persons, to stimulate the part of the brain that gives self control. Its not a good solution, for most Ritalin is a much better medication, it depends a lot upon the individual what med works best. When my son at a very early ages showed obvious signs of having the same disorder, I vowed that he would not have to go though what I did, and when it came time to send him to school, (he got thrown out of kndergarden too!), and he got dismissed from private school first garden and started public school, we started him on Ritalin. Took him off of it each summer so the body could ‘reset’ and avoid some of the possible side effects, and just toughed it out with the bad behavior thereby at home. It most certainly did NOT stifle creativity. IT DID enable him to concentrate and go though school, and along with an aide to assist in keeping him on task and to not explore the whole school instead, he graduated and became a productive member of society.
One thing to note…the environment is one of the main factors negatively impacting health and behavior…Sugar intake , artificial sweeteners, MSG and other excite-toxins and of course, too many vaccines and at too young of an age, can obviously all affect behavior. Look at the percentage rate of kids born with autism. Something you didn’t see in the past.
ADHD does exist, but many that are diagnosed just have behavioural problems or don’t fit with what is considered normal.
A damaged microbiome is usually the root cause, and your son would have inherited your microbiome. Toxins (food, environmental and pharmaceutical) impact on people with infection (in gut and body) MUCH more than people with a healthy gut and no infection in body.