Risperdal: the long and winding trail of crimes

Risperdal: the long and winding trail of crimes

“Hi folks. Guess what? We have a drug to treat below-average IQ and disruptive behavior in children. The drug causes brain damage, but don’t worry, be happy.”

by Jon Rappoport

May 9, 2017

(Note: Yes, our site, NoMoreFakeNews.com, is still down. We’re fixing the problem, but there are bureaucratic delays. Meanwhile, my blog is humming right along, and so is my email list. Bookmark my blog: blog.nomorefakenews.com)


Readers have noticed I’ve been redoubling my efforts lately to expose medical crimes. This circus of madmen needs exposing.

Medical criminals are leeches on the public body. They will say and do anything to maintain their position of authority.

They will say their fantasies are fact. They will say their toxic drugs are cures. They will say their useless and fake diagnoses are real. They will, when they work for drug companies, claim their latest maybe-could-be-hope-so breakthrough innovation is right around the corner.

As they work on their victims, they will deny they are sucking the life blood out of them. They will say they are helping them.

And they will defend themselves as scientists.

This is my experience working as an INDEPENDENT reporter for 35 years.

This is my experience investigating the center-stage area of the medical system: the long-term treatment of illness that goes on and on, from one diagnosis to another, one toxic drug to another, as people are brought into the circus, as they are guided through the circus for their whole lives.

The whole circus is fake. It’s a delusion. It’s money. It’s profit. It’s control. It’s poisonous. It’s the rigor of the parasite feeding on its victim.

The way to get out of it is to get out of it.

Over the years, I’ve had the ambition and the determination to document these medical matters. I’ve found evidence by the truckload. I’ve approached readers from many different angles with that evidence. I continue to do so.

What keeps me going is my perception of the circus—that it is a presentation of reality, a whole-hog reality, invented from scratch, by fools and liars and pretenders and psychopathic criminals.

What keeps me going is the understanding that the other side is: revolt—which includes people creating their own reality, the reality they truly want.

These are unshakable things.

The leeches know they need us for their sustenance. They are trying to pass laws that will make it mandatory for us to line up and watch them work on us—new laws, more laws. More binding laws.

So freedom is the clarion call. Freedom dispels the delusions and exposes the fakers. Freedom means people choose how to deal with their own bodies and minds. Freedom is the silver bullet to the vampiric lunatics. Freedom is the imperative. And freedom never goes away, even for the most abject slave. It comes to him in his dreams.

Freedom is the essence. You look at it, you take it. You stand with it. You launch from it.

Mainstream medical reporters—the most entrenched ones—are a low breed. They defend the leeches. They rally the public, who, hypnotically and aggressively (knowing nothing) stand for “science.” This is the great joke in the middle of the circus. The great, cruel, enduring joke.


The drug was approved, by the FDA, for public use in 1993, to treat schizophrenia, a “mental disorder” for which there is no defining diagnostic test. No blood test, no saliva test, no brain scan, no genetic assay.

In 2006, the FDA approved Risperdal to treat “irritability” in autistic children. There is no defining diagnostic test for autism. The neurological damage involved can come from any cause—especially vaccines. But of course, all public health agencies deny this fact.

In 2007, the FDA approved Risperdal to treat bipolar disorder in children between the ages of 10 and 17. Bipolar is another “mental disorder” for which there is no defining diagnostic test.

Risperdal was approved to treat three conditions, which are diagnosed by casually observing a patient’s behavior and comparing it to a menu of behaviors called schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism.

If the drug had no adverse effects, that would be one thing; but it has devastating effects. Tardive dyskinesia, a permanent “movement disorder” that signals brain damage. Suicide. Gynecomastia—boys grow female breasts.

Before I go on, NOTE: Rapid withdrawing from psychiatric drugs can have disastrous effects. See Dr. Peter Breggin on this subject.

Now let’s get to the lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson, Risperdal’s manufacturer:

2012: J&J fined $1.2 billion for hiding adverse effects of the drug. Decision overturned on appeal.

2012: J&J paid out $181 million for actively promoting off-label uses for Risperdal. Doctors are permitted to prescribe a drug for unapproved uses, but drug companies cannot legally promote or urge doctors to wander into that off-label territory.

2015-2016: There are at least 1500 suits against J&J for causing boys to grow female breasts. Thus far, three verdicts have been decided in favor of the boys, for $1.75 million, $2.5 million, and $70 million.

The story of Risperdal expands and explodes when we consider the marketing effort behind it. Basically, the hustle involved claims that the drug could be used to treat a wide array of so-called disorders in children.

I will now quote extensively from a classic article written at madinamerica.com, by Paula J Caplan, PhD. The title of her article (10/30/2015) is “Diagnosisgate: A Major Media Blackout Mystery”:

“Until their identities are widely exposed, and their motives are known, the full story of the [Risperdal] harm will never be known. It is astonishing that despite six stories in the major media — including a recent, groundbreaking Huffington Post series — and the filing of numerous lawsuits, the names and conduct of the culprits have consistently been omitted.”

“The story that has been called ‘Diagnosisgate’ starts in 1995, when the man widely considered the world’s most important psychiatrist split a payoff of nearly one million dollars with two colleagues in exchange for doing two patently unethical and illegal things that created the groundwork for a major drug company to market falsely one of the most dangerous psychoactive drugs [Risperdal].”

“Part one: In return for almost half a million dollars, they ignored what was known about the drug [Risperdal] in order to manufacture a practice guideline holding up that drug as the best drug among two whole classes of related drugs for treating people who were classified as ‘schizophrenic,’ the other drugs being marketed by other drug companies. This created what is widely considered the ‘standard of care,’ the treatment that therapists are supposed to follow and that they can use in the knowledge that they are well protected from lawsuits if they follow it and their patients are harmed. The very foundation of the guideline, that it was about ‘Schizophrenia,’ is illegitimate, because – though this will surprise many people – that category has been shown to be unscientifically created and indeed has been called a wastebasket for a wide variety of feelings and behavior, many of which are caused by psychiatric drugs.”

“Part two: After the triumvirate received a bonus of $65,000 for creating the guideline [‘treat schizophrenia with Risperdal’] speedily, their top psychiatrist wrote to the same drug company, announcing that the three had constituted themselves as an entity that was prepared, in return for about another half million dollars, to create a marketing plan for the drug. The details included finding ‘key opinion leaders’ (KOLs), who were prominent professionals in powerful positions – such as heads of state mental health or prison systems – and having them teach the Continuing Education courses that professionals are required to take, the ultimate message of those courses being that that particular drug [Risperdal] was the best one to prescribe. Another section of their marketing plan was to have a great many articles published in what are considered scientific or medical journals, all concluding that that drug was effective and should be prescribed.”

“It is not clear whether the three psychiatrists were directly involved in choosing the content of the journal articles, but the plan to produce such articles was carried out, leading to publication of pieces recommending use of the drug [Risperdal] to treat not only Schizophrenia but also Childhood Onset Schizophrenia, Schizo-affective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder in Children and Adults, Mania, Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorder other than Autism, Conduct Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Psychosis, Aggression Agitation, Dementia, below average IQ, and disruptive behavior. Thus, a staggering array of psychiatric categories – many of which are as scientifically sketchy as Schizophrenia – was used to promote the drug. This massive marketing campaign proceeded despite the many major negative effects of Risperdal, including drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, heartburn, dry mouth, increased saliva production, increased appetite, weight gain, stomach pain, anxiety, agitation, restlessness, difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, decreased sexual interest or ability, vision problems, muscle or joint pain, dry or discolored skin, difficulty urinating, muscle stiffness, confusion, fast or irregular pulse, sweating, unusual and uncontrollable movements of face or body, faintness, seizures, Parkinsonian symptoms such as slow movements or shuffling walk, rash, hives, itching, difficulty breathing or swallowing, gynecomastia in male children, painful erection of penis lasting for hours…and death.”

“Who are the characters in this mystery? Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a division of Johnson & Johnson, is the drug company, and Risperdal is the drug in question. The marketing term for Risperdal and similar drugs is ‘anti-psychotic,’ but the accurate term is ‘neuroleptic,’ reflecting the mechanism of suppressing the brain’s activity as a powerful tranquilizer. Dr. David Rothman, who wrote the expert witness report for one of the lawsuits about the marketing of Risperdal, revealed after scrupulous examination of vast numbers of internal emails between Janssen staff and the representative of the three psychiatrists, is a specialist in medical ethics and the Bernard Schoenberg Professor of Social Medicine at Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, the medical school of Columbia University. He is also director of the Center for the Study of Science and Medicine at Columbia and at the time of writing his expert witness report was president of the Institute on Medicine as a Profession. Rothman stated in his report that the [treatment] guidelines [for Risperdal] were constructed ‘in disregard of professional medical ethics and principles of conflict of interest,’ and that they ‘subverted scientific integrity, appearing to be a purely scientific venture when it was at its core, a marketing venture for Risperdal’.”

“The psychiatrist who spearheaded these [Risperdal marketing] efforts is Dr. Allen Frances, who the year before teaming with Janssen oversaw the publication of the fourth volume of the ‘Bible’ of hundreds of categories of mental illness, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, sales of which topped $100 million as a result of marketing by the lobby group called the American Psychiatric Association, which published it. By virtue of this position, he has been called the world’s most important psychiatrist. At the time, he was also Chair of the Department of Psychiatry at Duke University. The two psychiatrists who with Frances shared the nearly $1 million in payments from Janssen are Dr. John P. Docherty, who was then Professor and Vice Chairman of Psychiatry at Cornell University at the time, and Dr. David A. Kahn, who was Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University.”

“Now back to the mystery: Despite five individual stories in major media outlets in 2011, 2012, and 2014 about two huge Risperdal court cases filed by the state of Texas and joined by many other states, neither a single writer of any of these stories nor even the papers filed for the court cases named Frances, Docherty, or Kahn or described the fundamental roles played by their Practice Guideline and their marketing plan in the scandal. The mystery is deepened, because the authors of the media stories and the court documents did name and describe the roles of some of the KOLs [key opinion leaders], who assuredly were guilty of unethical conduct but whose participation was conceived of by Frances and his colleagues. And some of those who reaped huge financial profits from Risperdal’s false marketing – most notably Harvard University’s Dr. Joseph Biederman, who created an empire based on claims that ‘Bipolar Disorder in Children’ had been woefully underdiagnosed and untreated – have been royally outed for the enormous sums they earned. But even respected investigative journalist Steve Brill, who recently completed a unique, 15-part story of the Risperdal scandal for Huffington Post, and who described in detail many of its players and some of the patients who suffered terrible harm from the drug and who elegantly described the way that Janssen covered up data about some of the harm, left out the essential roles the Frances triumvirate played. Activist Vera Sharav of the Alliance for Human Research Protection published an online article about the Rothman Report and included the names of Frances and those two colleagues, her article was apparently picked up by only two or three bloggers and none of the major media reporters who read what she posts.”

There is more. Much more. I suggest you read Caplan’s entire article. In a half-sane world, she would have been awarded the highest possible honors for her work.

Risperdal. The long and winding trail. The severe damage. The hustle, the con. The crimes.

The lack of criminal prosecutions.

Brought to you by high authorities in the psychiatric profession and their allies.

A public revolt against the drugs and the pushers is necessary to stem the tide of poisoning.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “Risperdal: the long and winding trail of crimes

  1. Betty says:

    I don’t see a revolt coming any time soon. I’m guessing it is 2 generations away, if we last that long. When all the now parents and grandparents are gone who is going to take care of all the damaged people left.

  2. Theodore says:

    Wow. That term: ‘standard of care’:

    “This created what is widely considered the ‘standard of care,’ the treatment that therapists are supposed to follow and that they can use in the knowledge that they are well protected from lawsuits if they follow it and their patients are harmed.”

  3. Maria Peccorini says:

    My son was “treated” with this drug after being homeless & having a nervous breakdown. Many of the symptoms described in your article has happened to him. The personally saddest thing of all is that he has chosen to be estranged from me after years of being on this & other “medications” prescribed by his medicaid psych care workers.
    I worked hard to keep him vaccine-free, (while he was a child) due to my desire to attempt to protect him from harm, but I believe the damage done by risperdal far surpasses anything I could imagine earlier. I thank you for bringing this info out. If you have any links to the articles you mention in the blog, I’d sure appreciate the info.

  4. MA in MO says:

    I have come to the point in my life that I fear the medical/pharmaceutical complex way more than I fear the military/industrial complex. We are a nation of drug addicts — some of those drugs are legal, some are illegal — it makes no difference, I believe they are all coming from the drug companies who are being protected by Congress. The war on drugs was never intended to be won. It was intended though to make a few people a lot of money. Same goes for the legal drugs pushed by drug companies. I seek little to no medical care. Put me into the land of Morpheus to relieve pain and let me go met my Lord and Saviour. I refuse to let the medical/industrial complex take every thing I have worked for just to keep me alive. What little resources I have, I wish to give to charity, a good honest charity, not to the pharmaceutical industry.

  5. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    I was pleased to learn that Trump has pulled one ‘gator from the Washington, DC swamp:


    The most dangerous ‘gator, the US NAS, has already effectively castrated the new Secretary of Energy, Rick Perry, to protect 97% consensus science” from scrutiny.

  6. Jon

    The ills of chemical drugs are a small part of the “strategy”. Directly from my FB channel today:

    “Many are unclear of the Zionist Globalists utopian “messianic” agenda. They need first to financially takeover all corporate governments of the world. This is achieved when every single government of the world’s “public purse” is “in debt”. From that point people, who are not from privateer bloodlines, only have a redeemable “value” as marketable slaves. Socialism is the new false “pledge” of solidarity. Under those terms, private enterprise must eventually be outlawed at all cost.

    In a sense strict United Nations does achieve communion, but it is a forced communion that denies the rite of passage for the sake of ordered commerce. There is no greater tyranny against sovereignty than that.”


    • MA in MO says:

      Agreed. Since the UN has been going through all kinds of organizations — Chamber of Commerce, Optimist, Masonic Lodge, Black Lives Matter, Planned Parenthood, and many many more — to achieve their objectives, the President, Congress, and other legal legislative entities cannot stop their agenda.

  7. Therapist….is the conjunction of two words….THE….RAPIST.

  8. Note: “They will say their toxic drugs are cures.”

    No, they won’t. They never use the word ‘cure’, because cure requires proof. Instead they use the word ‘treatment’. Treatments only need to ‘work’, and work is defined by the clinical study used to approve the drug. Clinical studies prove that their drugs “don’t cure” better than any alternative medicines “don’t cure”.

    Cures actually address the illness and improve healthiness. Treatments make no claim to do either. Treatments address ‘selected symptoms’ as the illness progresses. Many cures result in new illnesses, euphemistically called ‘side-effects’.

    to your health, tracy

    • Bunny says:

      Not only will they not use the word “cure” but they will sue anyone else outside of their cartel’s control who dares to use the word.

  9. Jon, you and your readers may be interested in proposed changes to FCC’s net neutrality rules:


  10. Greg C. says:

    A public revolt? What we need is an alternative to restoring an unbalanced mind. There are holistic ways to do this, without having to go through clinical diagnosis (which you have rightly pointed out is a farce). There are a growing number of people who have found their way back by this route. It would be a great service, Jon, if you could investigate and bring to light these success stories, help spread the word that there is a better way.

  11. Psychopaths Rule the World says:

    All any psychotropic drug does to “help” a person is to DISABLE his or her brain. THAT’S IT. Every single one of them. Why would getting a disability be seen as a “benefit”? It couldn’t be DELIBERATE, could it? https://youtu.be/J6GrxUjePuY?t=103

    But that is not all. The drugs are so lethal that it can be proven that they kill at least 500,000 people each year over the age of 65 just in the United States and Europe alone, plus obviously many, many more under that age, not counting all the other countries. This makes psychotropic drugs the third leading cause of death, after heart attacks and cancer. As these two are not (usually) deliberately caused, this means that psychiatrists (and also the GPs who prescribe the drugs, which is now about 80% of them in most countries) are the biggest mass-murderers on the planet.

    From “Deadly Psychiatry and Organised Denial” by Professor Peter Gotzsche (September 1, 2015):

    “Psychiatry’s almost manic obsession with ineffective, addictive drugs has led to a disaster in public health so big that nothing I have seen in other areas of medicine comes close.”

    “Psychotropic drugs don’t fix a chemical imbalance, they cause it, which is why it is so difficult to come off the drugs again. If taken for more than a few weeks, these drugs create the disease they were intended to cure.”

    “Virtually all trials of psychotropic agents are flawed, not only because of the unblinding problem, but also because of their design. This was recognised decades ago, but drug trials and reviews have continued to pretend the problem doesn’t exist, likely because the psychiatrists choose to ignore everything that threatens the myths they have built up around their profession.”

    “The fact that psychotropic drugs in the long run create the diseases they have a short-term effect on has been brought up again and again over the last 30–40 years, but every time, no matter how strong the new evidence, leading psychiatrists have brushed it under the carpet as quickly as possible. It is too painful and too difficult for them to handle.”

    “Antipsychotics kill nerve cells so effectively that their possible use against brain tumours has been explored. The brain damage affects neurotransmission, including the number of receptors, and there is nothing strange about this. Hashish, LSD, alcohol and other brain-active substances may also lead to chronic brain damage and personality changes… apart from chemotherapy for cancer, it is difficult to identify a class of drugs in general use as toxic as antipsychotics.”

    “Although the science is convincing, psychiatrists rarely tell patients that their drugs can cause brain damage. Leading psychiatrists often say the opposite, that it is important to take antipsychotics and antidepressants since untreated schizophrenia and depression can cause brain damage, and that the sooner a person gets diagnosed and treated, the better the outcome.”

    “Our citizens would be far better off if we removed all the psychotropic drugs from the market.”


    “If this is true I am ashamed of beeing a Doctor.And it seems to be true.It is scarier than the book: Psycho.”

    ‘The data this book gives are absolutely shocking and I do not doubt they are true. The attitude of my “silverback” colleagues is well described.’

    “A brilliant, utterly astonishing analysis by a highly-regarded physician-scientist. A vitally important exposé of the lies, fraud, criminality, intellectual laziness and greed that seem to be key traits of Psychiatry Inc. Everyone involved in health care, and especially mental health, should read this book.”

    “This book needs to be compulsory reading for all trainee counsellors, psychologists, medical doctors, and of course psychiatrists. It’s content is scientifically sound, and frankly explosive in its revelation and implications. The content of this book has all the ingredients for any investigative reporter worth their grain of salt to create a major exposé. Yet despite this, the MSM have been silent. That in itself is something worth contemplating.”

    A lecture by Peter Gotzsche before the book was published, going over the shocking criminality and fraud of the whole enterprise:


    The crimes of these people are the worst kinds of crimes imaginable. They have probably destroyed and ended more lives than any other group of people on the planet alive today – after all, there are 120 MILLION people on psych drugs right now, plus all those dead and ruined from the past.

    “The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid ‘dens of crime’ that Dickens loved to paint. It is not even done in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern.” (Preface to The Screw Tape Letters, C. S. Lewis)

    Psychiatrists (and the pharmaceutical companies that make their drugs) are the nastiest business concern on face of the Earth bar none.

    And guess who brags about being ultimately responsible for all of this:


    Remember, depopulation is their total OBSESSION. All the governments, who know EXACTLY what is going on, lick their boots, and have no trouble genociding a large proportion of the people they are supposed to be “representing” just for some fake fiat currency for themselves. But when one learns about all the other things they get up to in private, it really is of no surprise at all.

    Peter Breggin: “Psychiatrists are the most ignorant people on the face of the Earth… For many reasons now, going to a psychiatrist [is] probably the most dangerous thing you can do in the Western world.”


    • Rastafari says:

      i quit reading when the article mentioned cannabis (hashish).
      proven to actually cause neurogenesis.
      most helpful plant on earth, constantly made demon.
      just like here, lump it in with other bad stuff.
      brain dead zombies will read and nod their brain damaged skull, yes, yes.
      and LSD was used for mind control until they discovered that it had no side effects.
      in addition, it was curing alcoholism and other so-called mental illness.
      that’s why you never hear of it anymore except for example, in this article where it’s lumped with alcohol.

      cannabis is the cure.

      • Psychopaths Rule the World says:

        Yeah. I checked out Gotzsche’s Twitter feed last night:


        and he quotes Richard Dawkins for his slogan, which is a real bad sign: “There is no reason to believe in anything for which there is no evidence”.

        The fact is that the mind can heal virtually anything that’s wrong with the body. However, the most important thing in that process is BELIEF.

        There will be no evidence beforehand that a specific individual can heal themselves using only their mind, at least officially according to most Western scientists, despite the fact that that the drug companies have to test against the “placebo effect” in their own trials. Nevertheless, if a person BELIEVES they can do it at a very deep level, it may very well happen. Same with everything else a person sets out to do for the first time in their life.

        If everyone thought like Dawkins, almost nothing new would ever be accomplished, and we would live in the cold, sterile, dreary world of people such as himself. The people who run the world from behind-the-scenes know this, which is why they promote people like him to “prominent” academic positions and throughout the media, while keeping the real knowledge to benefit themselves and weaponizing it against everyone else, then claiming it doesn’t exist.

        If there is any benefit to a person from psych drugs, it is only the person’s BELIEF that they work.

        [youtube/] watch?v=5kPPotbSRcA

        So there is no need for them, or their terrible side effects:

        [youtube/] watch?v=N57OTmM_OAw

        How could they ever have been approved? This is how research is done is psychiatry:

        [youtube/] watch?v=PreYCMkrLX8

        [youtube/] watch?v=wIubT4J7g-o

        Medicine should have been based, more than anything, on the fact that the mind can heal almost anything. And this can be used for a lot more than just healing people, because most of our lives should be creative and enjoyable, instead of just cleaning up the crap the psychopaths have dumped on us:

        [youtube/] watch?v=n3XxbF9iZ2w

        There is some very interesting information in the video below about this (see at 23:00), as well as what to DO about the huge number of problems being thrown at us by the powers-that-shouldn’t-be. This is advanced stuff, and as the $cience of the world of someone like Dawkins is extremely limiting and conservative, he would likely immediately dismiss the entire video out-of-hand, and probably want the speaker locked up in a psych ward to make him “see the truth” (i.e. have his brain disabled to be as stupid as him):

        [youtube/] watch?v=_yxTotA604M

        Much of medicine would have been based on the then burgeoning field of sound and electromagnetic frequency therapy if this man (brace yourself for THAT picture, for some reason it pierces my soul more than any other image I have ever seen):


        had not started the 100-year-fraud of Rockefeller pharmaceutical medicine in the early 20th century, responsible for probably hundreds of millions of deaths, and billions of people suffering needlessly.

        See at 53:00 of this video for an example of what sound can do:

        [youtube/] watch?v=jzpKm9QeLDo

        Gotzsche may be wrong about cannabis (which the authorities have said will cause psychosis until recently, but are now contradicting each other ( https://psychcentral.com/news/2013/12/10/harvard-marijuana-doesnt-cause-schizophrenia/63148.html vs http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4114634/Marijuana-DOES-cause-schizophrenia-triggers-heart-attacks-experts-say-landmark-study-slams-drug-s-medical-benefits-unproven.html ), even though Cathy O’Brien said it was the only thing the Bush mind-kontrolled slaves were not allowed to consume, because it would open up their minds).

        Then of course there is this:

        [youtube/] watch?v=5fhJvdHrxX8

        And this:

        [youtube/] watch?v=ZE1sUwY_q0k

        However, there there is no doubt psychiatry is a deliberate genocide project. The drug companies have known for a very long time about the extremely harmful and lethal effects of their drugs, and that they do not help anyone except through “placebo”, but they push them harder and harder all the time.

        For instance, by 1979, researchers found that antipsychotics actually increase vulnerability to psychosis by damaging the brain’s dopamine system (despite them still claiming TODAY that psychosis is a “dopamine imbalance”). In the 1990s, researchers found they enlarge the basal ganglia of the brain, and shrink the frontal lobes, thus causing both positive and negative symptoms of “schizophrenia”, which is a ridiculous concoction of many different types of problems that should never have been lumped together as a “disease”. So what did the Rockefeller-controlled drug industry do? They immediately gave the researchers a grant to produce an implant to ram into people’s brains to forcibly inject the drugs into them every day for the rest of their lives!

        Also in 1979, they say “Inoculation of behavioral drugs [Ritalin] can speed the transition for the child (mandatory)”, as “the family unit must be carefully disintegrated, and state-controlled public education and state-operated child-care centers must be become more common and legally enforced so as to begin the detachment of the child from the mother and father at an earlier age.” This is to bring about a process of “benevolent slavery and genocide”, as outlined in the “25th Anniversary Edition” of the original 1954 “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”, which, guess who, the Rockefeller Foundation “got in on the ground floor” in 1948 to set up, and was presented at the first Bilderberg Meeting. Ritalin (actually just super-charged cocaine, which also changes the structure of children’s brains for the worse) has been around since the 1950s.

        And in 2009, it was proven by Irving Kirsch in “The Emperor’s New Drugs” that SSRIs do NOTHING for depression, despite the drug companies hiding what they knew since 1978.


        But apparently they were really happy about this in their boardrooms! I was thinking, how could they possibly be happy about that?

        It turns out they had invented a new category, “treatment-resistant depression”, and are now saying that if someone is depressed, they need to take BOTH an antidepressant AND an antipsychotic, so the antidepressant will work! As usual, the drug companies blame the patient for their own fraud! And double the profits! (Actually more than double, as some antipsychotics have a 500,000% profit margin, making them the most lucrative drugs on the market.) I can never learn to think like these psychopaths. Antipsychotics are the most toxic drugs this side of chemo, and even the head of the NIMH admitted in 2013 they worsen psychosis: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2013/antipsychotics-taking-the-long-view.shtml

        Actually, they reduce recovery from psychosis from 80% to 5%.

        Back to what medicine should be like:

        [youtube/] watch?v=y-oizB2HE1o

        In her instruction course on how to do the above, this woman warned her students to stay away from doctors and all their drugs and vaccines:

        [youtube/] watch?v=tAR5FyqURrU

  12. By Kevin says:

    Love Jon Rappoport. I hope history recognizes you for the amazing hero you are.
    God bless and protect you.

  13. Tom says:

    Keep bringing this information to the surface Jon! More people need to read this kind of information, this kind of article needs to be out in the ether’s to gain momentum so we can abolish this crime. Thank you!

  14. rabbitnexus says:

    Too much for me to know where to begin. Thanks Jon.

  15. omdeva says:

    As a former practicing psychiatrist i left the field precisely because of all that Jon has indicated above. Writing endless prescriptions seemed to be my role in the system! That and meeting with an endless array of drug reps touting the latest, Godspeed you on your efforts to enlighten us all!

    • P.Frank says:

      With a family member under psychicriac care I always wondered why they refuse to scan the organ they claim to be treating…the brain.

  16. Viktoria Sigrun says:

    Many thanks Jon for this valuable information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *