Would you censor Alex Jones and Mike Adams if you could?

by Jon Rappoport

February 27, 2017

(To join our email list, click here.)

I write this in the wake of Google’s takedown of Mike Adams’ Natural News, and adroll.com’s decision to stop placing product-ads for Alex Jones’ InfoWars. These are momentous events.

(Update, 2/28/2017: Google reinstates NatrualNews.com domain to its search engine listings.)

In the current climate, there are MANY people who would, at the drop of a hat, censor and erase a news outlet if they could. And they would believe they’re doing Good.

Their knowledge of the 1st Amendment and its implications? Zero. Free speech? Who cares?

Much better to delete, erase, scream, light fires, turn over cars, block speakers, shout them down.

Here are several statements about free speech written by non-screamers:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (First Amendment to the United States Constitution. December 15, 1791)

“There is nothing so fretting and vexatious, nothing so justly TERRIBLE to tyrants, and their tools and abettors, as a FREE PRESS.” (Samuel Adams, 1768)

“Goebbels was in favor of freedom of speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re in favor of freedom of speech, that means you’re in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise.” (Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, 1992)

But you see, there are now many groups who have traveled miles past a tolerance for ideas they despise. And these aren’t merely people in the street. Google apparently has passed the point of tolerance. So has adroll.com, a company that makes money by placing ads for clients like infowars. Then we have college professors and students from shore to shore, who insist on silencing those who dissent from their political ideology. And Facebook and Twitter are practicing censorship. To say nothing of major media outlets, who block stories that contradict their covert agendas.

There is always a THEY whose words and ideas are too dangerous to allow into the light. This assumption is shared by strange bedfellows: defenders of the National Security State and paid provocateurs throwing bricks at car windshields.

There is always a reason to shut people up.

“I’m in favor of free speech, but when (insert name) goes off on one of his crazy diatribes, he’s threatening basic human values, and he has to be stopped.”

Yes, and who appointed this “human-values defender” king?

Obama recently told an audience that news needs to be “curated” in some way, in order to limit the infection of “fake news.” Who appointed him to stand in for the 1st Amendment?

Peter Maass, The Intercept: “…the Obama administration has used the draconian 1917 law [the Espionage Act] to prosecute more leakers and whistleblowers than all previous administrations combined.”

No problem. The president takes precedence over the Constitution, doesn’t he? Ask any college student, as long as you insert Obama’s name for “president,” and not Trump’s name.

It all depends, you see. It all depends on who is speaking about free speech. And it all depends on who is being attacked. It’s relative.

If you’re a medical blogger living in mommy’s basement, and you attack Mike Adams for his medical views, you’re golden. You want to limit Mike’s 1st Amendment rights? Why not? “Mike is dangerous. Mike is a threat to real science. Therefore, who cares if Google delisted his web site?”

The Constitution was actually an exercise in political and social relativity, right? It was never intended to mean what it said. It was always a “floater,” designed to favor good and oppose evil—and those moral decisions have to be made by “the wise ones.”

Shortly after the election results in November, the CIA-connected Washington Post launched a campaign against “fake news” sites. The campaign quickly morphed into: these sites aided a Russian op to throw the election to Trump. In other words, free speech was actually aiding and abetting a crime. That’s the way it was positioned.

Smear free speech as criminal. Any which way.

Here is another excuse for censoring free speech: “It is engendering hate.” Accepting that premise, every presidential campaign in the history of the United States could have been shut down. Untold numbers of statements made by pundits about presidents in office could have been blocked.

If a person “taking offense” at something someone says becomes the standard for censoring “offending remarks,” Congress should pass a law requiring silence 24/7 from all citizens.

So: who would censor a political website if they could? Huge numbers of clueless people with an ax to grind. They would do it without a moment’s thought. They would do it without a shred of understanding. They would do it based on zero knowledge of the Bill of Rights. They would do it minus an education that reveals how rational debate is a prerequisite for the survival of a Republic. They would do it based on zero knowledge of the meaning of “Republic.”

They would do it with the reflex of cows munching on grass in a pasture.

And even worse, few people would voice objections to the act of censorship.

“I would rather eat a cupcake, watch Law&Order, play World of Warcraft, put mustard on a hot dog, hand out a trophy for ‘participation’ than object to censorship.”

Or this: “I don’t like Alex Jones and Mike Adams. Never did. So while I defend the basic right to free speech, I don’t really care if they’re hamstrung. I don’t care if they’re blocked in some way. On balance, it’s a good thing. I pick my battles, and this isn’t one of them…”

Really? What about MSNBC? Suppose the network was shut down and censored? Would such an action rate as a serious incursion on the 1st Amendment? What about censorship of the Huffington Post or Politico or CNN? Would that rate a howl of protest?

Let’s have a scale of importance. Take names like Karl Marx, Hitler, Lenin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Plato, St. Augustine, Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions, Hillary Clinton, Henry Kissinger…

Decide how to rank them, in terms of who is deserving of outright censorship.

Then, burn the 1st Amendment.

Burn it to ashes, scatter the ashes in a fetid swamp, and celebrate the victory of “moral values” and the protection of the citizenry over “dangerous freedom.”



The 1st Amendment isn’t there so we can admire the freedom of the people who utter what we already agree with. The 1st Amendment is there so we can rise up to a higher level, where we defend the rights of the people who are uttering all the wrong things, the things we’re quite sure are wrong.

Well, except for Trump. Except for Hillary. Or Bannon. Pelosi. Ryan.

Or Alex Jones and Mike Adams.

This is the age of information. Some information. Select information. Good information. Proper information.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

40 comments on “Would you censor Alex Jones and Mike Adams if you could?

  1. tomaz050959 says:

    The Illusion of Free Speech

  2. Patricia says:

    The only way I have been able to determine what is really happening since President Trump ran for election, is to watch alternate media. I would be lost without it. It helps me put the puzzle pieces together and keeps me in touch with what is actually happening, or the possible hidden agendas everywhere. – Not because I am told, but because I can use my own logic to determine my opinion from a combo of MSM and alt media.

    That said, there are times Alex Jones can be so emotional or interrupt a guest so many times it becomes frustrating. I don’t think it’s Alex’ schtick, but how Alex feels. He probably doesn’t count anymore the number of death threats; but that is horrific to deal with and must affect him. Alex doesn’t use ET’s or reptilian theories to explain himself either, like Bill Cooper or David Icke.

    Bill Clinton came after Cooper for taxes and Cooper was killed near his home in a shoot-out. He had always said he wouldn’t be taken alive.

    My opinion of David Icke has diminished since he began. I really wonder if the reptile theory is all to support a mental illness defense should it become necessary.

    • Tamara Pitman says:

      omg, honestly! you need to read REAL NEWSPAPERS> LEFT RIGHT AND FOREIGN< and then compare. that's how you really know what's going on. they issue errata, they get sued if they make mistakes, they have an investigative budget to really find and dig. the "alternative media" are like the "alternative facts' that kellyanne pushes…it's lies and populism, it's saying ANYTHING to make a buck.

    • Daniel Sifuentes says:

      That would make sense for David Icke, wouldn’t it? But yeah he’s just on another level and doesn’t really care what other humans suffering with self denial think of him. Nevertheless, your logic resonates. Stay intuitive, humans around your person that are less aware need that frequency you emit if they are ever going to wake up and see the light for themselves.

  3. Terri says:

    Thank you, Jon. You have cited another example of treason against our republic committed by the people against themselves, and aiding and abetting their public servants to do so as well. Our constitution is not just a piece of paper, it is a brilliant document which was divinely inspired to give the people a choice to live in a higher manner, as sovereign self realized powerful beings. It is an antidote to trans humanism, the borg.
    Perhaps they knew the challenges we would be facing, and wanted to leave a template for us to adhere to, to avoid becoming less than human zombies.

    The power of the mind control the media has over the clueless masses has been perfected. Excerpt from a conversation I had with an 80 something year old aunt who has always lived in california and embraces all of their communist ideas without thought; “Trump has thrown out the reporters like cnn. what is this, Russia?” (see how easy it is to tie Trump to Russia?) no matter that the press is lying. Now she is upset because she doesn’t know who to believe….. On the evacuations because of the dam, i said the funds to upkeep the dam had been misappropriated, and she said i don’t know where you heard that, i didnt read about that. To have to question that her beloved komrades are endangering the people is beyond her comprehension.

    Vaccines? She loves em. No interest in hearing anything about the ingredients or the studies that show they don’t work. actual anger if the subject is brought up. Supporter of a police state? yep, you should always obey authority no matter what and if you don’t you deserve to be punished, yes, even killed, because, you know, cops have bad days too. authority is never wrong. Without authority there would be chaos is another belief, as if humans are monsters that can only control themselves due to the threat of punishment. Parents can homeschool their children? that is an incomprehensible idea to her, because don’t you need authority to tell you what to do and what is important?

    How do you associate with people like this? I am glad I only have to make a phone call every now and then, and do my best to focus on her better qualities. She is a classic example of an abusive upbringing, and how it sets people up for mind control. How did I escape from being like her? I had to fight every day of my life to defend myself against the people who raised me, (her brother and sister in law, who have the same philosophy) and then, society at large. It truly is a fight of life or death. To be disparaged every day by people who are supposed to love you, for not joining the borg and choosing to be real, has been painful beyond my ability to express, but the alternative, to join the borg, and receive their approval, is a fate worse than death. A choice I made which was an easy decision, but in practice so difficult very few even consider it.

    Is the younger generation going to be different? Will the millenials ever grow up? My aunt is 80 something years old, not likely she is going to change. These young people have a life ahead of them, and I can only pray they will choose something different. The first amendment was put first, since our founders knew the power of the Word. If parents continue to shut their own children down and silence them, how can these children grow up and have respect for the Word and know how to think, or speak up, or what to know as truth? How will they ever be able to respect others opinions without fear they will be harmed by them?

  4. From Quebec says:

    So, the LEFT censors the RIGHT.

    If the RIGHT starts censoring the LEFT what will happen?

    We would be LEFT with nothing… RIGHT?

    • Patricia says:

      Your use of English is brilliant PQ! Freedom of speech is vital.

      I want to post the following because a method of censorship is via omission, commonly used in Canada. The following letter addresses my objection to a commercial with child actors to forward the Muslim agenda with no mention of any other religion. I sent this letter to federal and provincial members of parliament, newspapers in Ottawa and Toronto and the Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants – who replied to me within the hour – gave me a Borg like response – thanked me ever so much and immediately returned my letter to me from their mail, marked “not delivered.” An example of censorship at its finest perhaps.

      Currently we have Bill M103, M-103, ‘…debated this week, asks the government to condemn Islamophobia and all other kinds of “systemic racism and religious discrimination.” If it passes, the Commons heritage committee will be asked to study the issue and develop strategies to tackle the scourge.” (Ref: Huffington Post).

      Canada is the back door, front door, you name it, to the United States. The USA would protect us in an emergency and we need to look out for our US neighbour.

      My letter and the URL to the commercial follows. Children in the commercial would not be aware of 911 or the plane jokes the circulated at the time.

      RE: http://www.breakthebehaviour.ca

      I am an immigrant and came here from England in 1957.

      The “Pledge to Break the Behaviour” is absolutely discriminatory and needs to be withdrawn. Using children to portray the message is horrific and a form of brainwashing. Any decent family in Canada ascertains that children do not have prejudicial attitudes towards others. The underlying agenda with this commercial is that children should regard Muslims as much more important/special than anyone else. That is totally unfair and absolutely wrong. Children are raised in families, not by you, or the government.

      If your funding is from my contribution to the taxes in Canada I want you to know that I do not approve of this “pledge” – it is nothing more than coercion at its worst. It is funding that could be spent for much better purpose on Canadians. Who, or what, funds your organization?

      When I arrived with my family in 1957 my parents contributed immediately to the Canadian economy and wellbeing. No one greeted us with winter coats. My father paid back within the first year, a loan from his father for our passage on the RMS Scythia. We have never used your services because we worked hard and contributed to this society.

      The team of tool design engineers that my father lead was known as the “United Nations” because of the multi-cultural make-up of his staff. When my father died, a black engineer stopped by our house to thank us for all my father had done for him. He had been successful in filing a complaint of discrimination against Boeing.

      I became a Canadian in every sense of the word.

      I am thoroughly disgusted with this effort to turn Canada into a Muslim nation and to join a one world government – and that is the hidden agenda. I do not approve of Prime Minister Justine Trudeau’s agenda; particularly his dispersal of excessive funds not benefitting Canadians.

      We have Canadians who are needy: children, seniors, entire families. These are the people who deserve priority, not the Muslim so-called “refugees.”

      Your efforts to coerce the population to this “new point of view” need to stop. “Political Correctness” is completely the opposite of freedom of speech, which is what our forefathers gave to us with the sacrifice of many of their lives.

      Europe and the UK have been seriously damaged by the Muslim “refugees” who are nothing more that economic migrants. Young men posing as teenagers and when they are billeted with trusting families in England, asking for a razor to shave – as they attend school with children who are the age they claim to be.

      The people in the UK didn’t run when invasion was threatened. They stood ground and fought for freedom along with allied forces, including Canadians.

      It is your responsibility to protect Canada and not flood it with people who will demand Sharia Law, meanwhile stoning women to death for the slightest infraction of their “rules” in their home country.

      Furthermore, the following is the factual base of my decision today to contact you, because this is what you are supporting as directed by the Qur’an:

      1. You can rape, marry, and divorce prepubescent girls (Qur’an 65:4)
      2. You can enslave for sex and work (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 5:89, 33: 50, 58:3, 70:30)
      3. You can beat sex slaves, works slaves, and wives (Qur’an 4:34)
      4. You will need 4 Muslim male witnesses to prove a rape (Qur’an 24:4)
      5. You are to kill Jews and Christians if they do not convert or pay the Jizya tax (Qur’an 9:29)
      6. You are to crucify and amputate non-Muslims (Qur’an 8:12, 47:4)
      7. You will kill non-Muslims to receive 72 virgins in paradise (Qur’an 9:111)
      8. You will kill anyone who leaves Islam (Qur’an 2:217, 4:89)
      9. You will behead non-Muslims (Qur’an 8:12, 47:4)
      10. You will kill and be killed for Al’llah (Qur’an 9:5)
      11. You will terrorize non-Muslims (Qur’an 8:8:12, 8:60)
      12. You may steal from non-Muslims (Qur’an Ch. 8)
      13. You may lie and deceive to strengthen Islam (Qur’an 3:26, 3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 40:28)”

      There is another belief known as Taqqyaya:

      Taqiyya (taqiya, taqiyah, taqiyyah) is a form of Islamic deception. The Quran (16:106 and 3:28) allows Muslims to lie in order to protect themselves or to protect the Muslim community

      I find your lack of loyalty to Canadians appalling. I find your endorsement appalling. You need to stop it.

      • Suzie says:

        Wonderful and powerful letter. Thank you from another Canadian who couldn’t have put it better. There are many Canadians who agree with you, but they play the ‘politically correct’ game of lies.

        • From Quebec says:

          To Patricia:

          First: Thanks for the compliment. I wasn’t sure if I would post it, but I though it was funny, so I took a chance.

          Regarding your comment, (your letter about immigration) , I share the exact point of views.

          I hate Justin Trudeau, he is so useless. I still cant believe that some people voted for him.

          But, that is nothing. Here in Quebec, we have a population of 8,215 millions.

          Our Prime minister Philippe Couillard, wants 51, 000 refugees for 2017. Can you magine that?

          And, Montreal Mayer, Denis Coderre, wants to build sanctuary cities for these so-called

          I can’t even believe how stupid we are.

          We badly need a Donald J Trump in Canada.

      • Terri says:

        Patricia,Thanks so much for taking the time to contact your government. This is what everyone needs to do! This is a classic example of them denying, if you were American, your rights guaranteed by the 1st, 4th and 5th amendments….

        Our rights which are God given and inherent, to speak and seek that our grievances are addressed, as well as due process in all its important aspects. I am not familiar with the constitution of Canada, but perhaps these are in there as well and do your officials take an oath of any kind? They must uphold their oath or they commit treason, maybe you can add this to your next letter? The question is, who is going to remove lawfully and legally the traitors from office? Only until enough people speak out can this happen. They better speak up soon. Only a small percentage of the people would be necessary to pursue and succeed in a legal and lawful manner, but by small percentage I mean more than 10 or 100.

        How do we deal with this mass insanity and self destruction? We have to start repairing the damage which has occurred from centuries of apathy and ignorance and take back our families and our lives. We must put the government back in its proper place, and bind our reps to the chains of our constitutions, as the creatures they are who are supposed to work for the people. Canada has its roots in England common law as well. As the famous eighteenth century jurist, Sir William Blackstone, observed in Commentaries on the Laws of England, “whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself: there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to.”

        FQ your comment was funny, good play on words.

        • Patricia says:

          Terri, thank you for your passion and your response. Here’s a pdf of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CH37-4-3-2002E.pdf

          This one’s from parliament and sorta glazes over the actual content of the oath taken by MP’s:

          As I have a background in law, Class Action law suit comes to mind. But as yet I have not seen any lawyers offering pro bono to do this. Of course they possibly see the increase in population as more fees for them, as Jihadi Justin sees it as more votes.

          We surely must not lose our voice as a society and that is the definition of what is happening here and now.

          • Terri says:

            Hi Patricia, the rights and freedom charter clearly prohibits a bill such as the one they are proposing and probably many that have already been allowed to pass.
            Fundamental Freedoms
            2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
            (a) freedom of conscience and religion;
            (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom
            of the press and other media of communication;
            (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
            (d) freedom of association.

            In America, our public servants not only take an oath, but must also hold a surety or performance bond to hold office, to keep them honest. We also have the 14th amendment, sections 3 and 4 which are self executing, and provide for the automatic removal of any who perjure their oath. Any law that is not in compliance with the Supreme law of the land is null, void and without effect.

            Perhaps you can contact groups or individuals and start writing letters making appointments to visit your reps and demand your rights are upheld. we dont need lawyers as much as we need committed, intelligent individuals to create change. Like you said, most are corrupt anyway. The best thing to do is keep it to legal terms, instead of allowing them to distract with sjw terms. For example either it is or is not repugnant to the constitution, and you either are or you are not upholding your oath. I agree, the oath description from parliament was very very vague and didn’t appear to mean much of anything. What good is an oath if there is no accountability and enforce ability? It must be somewhere, and they obviously don’t want it to be easy to find.

            the fact that the people appear to be becoming more aware is promising, but legal and lawful action is imperative, now more than ever. The writing is on the wall and all the things many have been warning about for 50 or more years is coming to pass.


      • CPP says:

        M103 isn’t a bill, it’s a non-binding motion.

        “Motion 103 is not a bill, and it will never become law.”

        “The motion will not place any new legal restrictions on freedom of speech. It has no power to change Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms or any other law. Anyone who wishes to denounce Islam or Muslims publicly can still do so if this motion passes.” (http://globalnews.ca/news/3256675/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-anti-islamophobia-motion-making-waves-in-ottawa/)

        But that last sentence is rather dubious…could we “denounce” Muslims or Jews in Canada without running into the hate speech laws? To what degree and in what context? Ask Arthur Topham about it.

        Here’s a short video relating to M103 from Jordan Peterson, University of Toronto psychology professor. His notoriety erupted back around September for his opposition to “human rights” legislation that appeared to legally compel the use of invented non-binary gender pronouns.


        • Patricia says:

          @CPP, MSM that I read, described M103 as a Private Members Bill. Good for you to discover otherwise via MSM/Global News.

          But I take issued with Global’s quote: “Motion 103 is not a bill, and it will never become law.” Yes, motions don’t become verbatim law, but whatever you want to call M103 – (monstrosity103) – it’s in the house, these words set the scene, the tone, the rhetoric, the codswallop balderdash too prevalent today in MSM – and this sets the stage for laws and the state of the nation.

          I was aware of Jordan Peterson and his quest for fame and resisted the urge to inform him how much I dislike his input towards the destruction of Canadian society, including kindness, love and freedom. Basically I wanted to tell him what a twit he is. Having now been exposed to his horrific effort to hypnotize via his vid about Mohammed above, I shall desist.

          • CPP says:

            Wow what an absurd mischaracterization of Peterson. What exactly is your problem with him, anyway? And what do you mean “horrific effort to hypnotize”? That clearly wasn’t the point of the vid at all…he and you are both basically speaking against the motion…you’re not making sense.

    • Bunny says:

      WE don’t have a “left”..we only have Right and slightly less Right.The big media corporations are libertarian (neo-liberal) pro-corporate.

      For the last 50 years America has moved further and further to the right, to the point where Hillary Clinton would make Nixon or Eisenhower look like commie pinkos.

      This move to REVERSE the NEW DEAL put forward by FDR ws fist put together by a group of “Christian” business men, who retooled Christianity into a weaponized form you see today..

      The other arm of this movement to take power away from the working class,was the dissemination of various libertarian “think tanks” and movements. (when i use “libertarian” i am using it in the sense of “free market” trickle down BS Reagonimic theories- of tax the middle class to siphon money into the pockets of wealthy corporations, take away the social safety net for people, and have socialism for corporations. Externalize cost to the public, privatize the profits of the corporation, while socializing the cost of its operation and use of commons.
      Also completely remove all regulation protecting the public from destruction of their persons, property, and lives..or things they hold in common , like water)
      The Clintons were just as neoliberal as Reagan.
      If you want to understand the movement read Chomsky’s Profit over People.

      We no longer have a country of the people, for the people, we have a country that hoses down the working class for taxes that are then used to subsidize massive transnational corporations…and this is called “free market”.

      Now we have a Supreme Court that has the audacity to claim that MONEY is SPEECH.
      Since Speech is a constitutional right, this means that those with more money have MORE rights than those with less…this is the definition of a Plutocracy.

      A corporate Charter is a legal document granting Personhod status to a business, allowing them to kill, main and destroy with impunity and without accountability, All For Profit.
      We need to start yanking corporate charters..period

  5. handsome298 says:

    No I’d send them to a mental hospital , not to make fun of them. In all seriousness you need to accept the fact Alex uploaded a porno flick he thought had Barack Obamas Mother . Lost all credibility . No?

  6. onebornfree says:

    Jon, the Constitution and Bill of Rights was a scam. A scam designed to get all of the new slaves all nice and relaxed and trusting. ‘Worked pretty well, wouldn’t you say?:

    Or, “Dream On”? :

    “In your dream, Donald Trump is not a fraud,
    In your dream, Sanders was not a fraud,
    In your dream, Hilary Clinton was not a fraud,
    In your dream, all the rest were not frauds,
    In your dream, Obama is not a fraud,
    In your dream, Reagan was not a fraud,
    In your dream, all the rest were not frauds,
    In your dream, the Constitution is not a scam
    In your dream, the Supreme Court is not a scam,
    In your dream, 9/11 was not a scam…….”

    from “Dreams [Matrix Blues]”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMXtoUtXrTU

    Regards, onebornfreeatyahoo.

    • dunc says:

      there are some great parables .you can even blend them .never cry wolf meets chicken little not realizing where ever you go their you are.when is enough enough?.all are frauds ? we do look in the mirror at times don’t we.? .it at times can be a painful journey being in the matrix and knowing it.

    • From Quebec says:

      You almost got it right, except for the first line, the six line and the eight line.

  7. Patricia says:

    Considering Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate, perhaps handsome298, has some special factual knowledge about Obama’s mother that he would like to share.

  8. Steve Wiseman says:

    Chomsky can criticise Goebbels but he was/is afraid to tell the truth about 9-11.

  9. floridaborne says:

    I don’t mind a differing opinion. What I do mind is outright lying and half-truths in an effort to bring down a person or idea.. There is a line between freedom of speech and slander.

    • Bunny says:

      Exactly. In fact one of the fathers who lost his son at Sandy Hook decided to go after the Hoaxers(conspiracy theorists) and not only harass them online in the same manner they did to him, but took them to court as well..it is a sad day when someone is attacked and has to defend themselves WHILE they are grieving.

      I find it very peculiar that just about EVERY conspiracy “researcher” out there hold alt right views…this is a pretty good indication of who they are being funded by..in other words, wealthy billionaires who fund movements like the John Birch Society, or think tanks like Rand Corporation,Heritage Foundation, et al.

      • floridaborne says:

        It’s on both the right and left. One cannot be too diligent.

        • Kieron says:

          Indeed it is, and each side is smugly and gleefully pointing to the other and saying, “See? See?! We told you, they lie, they censor, they hate, they shut you down, etc etc etc., but WE are the good ones, the pure ones, the righteous ones!” It’s sickening no matter what political stripe it’s coming from.

  10. annj49 says:

    What is “free” speech?
    Who decides what can be published and what should be restricted?
    What does it matter?
    Some interesting points in this article……..
    What do YOU think?

  11. John says:

    “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” -George Orwell-

  12. dunc says:

    you said it jon .it gives me a pit in my stomach .but? action? i stopped enriching bozo the clown and buying on amazon . i now use other search engines .bing etc .hope they don’t follow google. i encourage awareness in these matters and i will patronize good old alex directly on his site .i spend money where it provides the sustenance for free thinking individualist oriented merchants.absolutely in every way i can..no bucks no buck rogers ..you too jon..what can we do to help you?

  13. robertwachsmuth says:


  14. The Espionage Act appears much more important than on face value, Jon.

    It has been well argued that “World War One” (why call it that?) was the first botched attempt at global totalitarian (followed by the “League of Nations”). Others have postulated that 2017 (century of the Zionist Workers Revolution) was the new “provisional” date for authoritarian globalist control. I think the Espionage Act might be the clincher. If I understand it correctly (unlike the Official Secrets Act) it could be “used against” anyone?

    I need to contemplate reasoning more.


  15. Bjorn Till says:

    Attacking, restricting or preventing FREE SPEECH and real human freedom in every area of life is UNACCEPTABLE! The attacks on NaturalNews and InfoWars should clearly tell us why WE need to do EVERYTHING WE CAN to support these, and promote FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACROSS PLANET EARTH! NaturalNews and InfoWars – and Jon Rappoport – work tirelessly to inform us about the political attacks, crime and injustices committed against human rights and freedom every day! JOIN THE FIGHT BY ACTIVELY SUPPORTING THEM!

  16. Sue says:

    I found out about censorship many decades ago, trying to get the truth reported. What I discovered is that most people are lemmings, and are not capable of independent thought. Anyone who wants to know the truth has to fight censorship. But most recent generations are poisoned with vaccinations and are not capable of independent thought. Say goodbye, world. The poisoned are now in control. You will see them murdering their parents, murdering their siblings, murdering their children. I call it the absolute judgement. What we do to other living beings, and find our excuses for doing so (torture, slaughter, etc) . Vaccination, Social Violence, and Criminality by Harris …

  17. We are rapidly transitioning from the information age, to the disinformation age. And in this new age, we are going to witness those who really have their mental faculties in order, because society is going to bifurcate [if it hasn’t already done so] between those capable of seeing the magician for who he is, and those that don’t even know what they don’t even know.

  18. ebolainfo says:

    GOOGLE REINSTATES NATURAL NEWS… details developing… your voice was heard!

    KEEP SIGNING THIS WHITE HOUSE PETITION (now 62K) to oppose censorship

    Health Ranger to issue statement at 11am Central…


    • Theodore says:

      This is great to hear!

      Yes, when I now type in Natural News into startpage.com (whose back-end is google), the result I now see is that naturalnews.com comes out on top.

  19. George Shaver says:

    If I desired to censor either of them, it would be to prevent their messages from being heard and considered by other people who also have a right to have that information. When I censor you, I don’t value your freedom to think and believe what you choose to believe and I don’t value your Freedom of Speech, your Right to Bear Arms or any of the other inalienable rights that we as American’s have long cherished.

    We, the people, have been brainwashed, propagandized, influenced and polarized into opposite extremes. We are fighting each other and not the real enemy. American politics is our problem. The psychology they used on us is changing our views and causing America to implode from within. American’s are causing America to become a totally defeated country and that we cause our own collapse. We suffer from a belief gap created by our new Identity politics. We have become culturally divided. A rift has been created with the purpose to destroy us all.

    We have been made into our own enemy. They make enemies of our friends and give us new beliefs to the extreme. Can we please stop fighting? and how about honoring our own election process, or get out and once and for all OUTLAW COMPUTER VOTING MACHINES.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *