There is a lot of static and interference out there now
by Jon Rappoport
November 13, 2016
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
The tsunami of election news and fallout has created much confusion out there. People are exhausted; they’re running and hiding; their uncertainty is spiking; their cynicism is kicking into high gear; they’re trying, in some cases, to dumb themselves down…
This always happens when a large event is resolved in favor of one side, but doubts remain about the winner. It’s as if the lights in the stadium went out during the last quarter of the Super Bowl. What happened? What’s happening now? What will happen?
People are even forgetting they have lives of their own. And that’s what I want to return to. Because, when individuals park their own lives, they’re bound to experience disorientation.
General issues raised in the presidential campaign have stimulated questions that individuals ask themselves: do I want to be free? How free? Do I want to take control over my own destiny? What are my true goals? Where am I going?
These and other similar questions are, of course, quite valid. And yes, answering them can cause an upheaval.
And the life of the individual is paramount. What difference does the course of the nation make, if the individual loses his way, if most individuals lose their way? After all, this nation was founded on the basis of liberation of the individual.
I suggest that the disparity between where a person is headed and where he REALLY wants to go is at the core of the confusion he may be feeling. This disparity has arisen time and time again in my consulting work with private clients.
It doesn’t resolve by turning away and ignoring the gap. It doesn’t resolve by pretending the situation isn’t real.
The presidential campaign featured two candidates who had very different visions for the future of America. Those differences caused many people—if only at a subconscious level—to question their own vision for their own future.
What’s the compromised vision? What’s the real one?
What’s the vision that would get me out of bed in the morning ready to go, filled with energy and excitement and optimism?
When a person sacrifices THAT, he’s operating from a severe deficit. He’s filling in blanks in his life with rationalizations.
The notion of serious contemplation has become foreign in this society. But serious contemplation is exactly what is needed, if the individual is to change course and move in the direction he really wants to pursue.
This is not a side issue. This is a central issue. This is the big one.
Understanding that fact alone can restore equilibrium. And then, self-engagement in discovering what the best personal vision is becomes the next adventure.
No amount of static and interference floating in the air these days justifies backing away from that adventure.
The life of the individual is paramount.
The founding principles of this nation were engraved to emphasize it.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
good work Jon all will be WELL
Here’s a personal vision well-explored:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/touching-the-wild-touching-the-wild/8679/
“Joe Hutto’s idea of research is anything but normal, dedicating seven years of his life to becoming a wild mule deer. The herd would ordinarily run from any human but, incredibly, these keenly intelligent animals come to regard this stranger as one of their own.”
I love Jon’s perspective BUT must say in this election cycle he has lost a little focus. That focus being that without a shadow of doubt this election and every election since 2000 has been decided in advance, voting is totally rigged and that the idea of American voters actually deciding anything is but an illusion at best and a cruel manipulative hoax, but such is life in the MATRIX. In the following pdf link Jon is featured prominently when he wrote about Prop 37 (GMO labelling) vote in CA in 2012, enjoy:
http://mileswmathis.com/vote.pdf
With Trump, we can finally reject the determinist system that has been steering this country into globalism. Do you have evidence to support your extraordinary claim that Trump was the predetermined outcome all along? I’m guessing no.
I think you will find this link insightful, particularly if you are numerate and logical:
http://mileswmathis.com/trump2.pdf
IMNAHA, I would counter that Jon is well aware of what you say and more, in light of his many years of honest, truth-seeking investigative journalism. However, you may be overlooking the fact that his primary focus remains the creative power of each individual’s imagination. Although we need to be aware of what is occurring, and to honestly consider the possibility that the truth may still be obscured, we cannot stay stuck there! To do so is to only add our own imagination to reinforcing the Matrix (i.e., that’s just the way it is and always will be).
As I have said before, why is it such an impossibility to consider the idea that that the tide is, in fact, turning, because enough people are actually using their imaginations to create new realities? Isn’t just such a turning point exactly what most of want in our deepest desires (if we are being honest with ourselves)?
In one of Jon’s interviews with Jack True in his “The Matrix Revealed” series, when Jon asked him how many such people he estimated it would take to “turn the tide,” his answer was 5,000 people. Imagine…only 5,000 people!…truly plugged into their reclaimed imagination and creating new realities! As for me, I am claiming one of those 5,000 seats!
This is perhaps understandable, Jon
Given the last FAKE Messiah made all sort promises that were either deliberately misleading or outright lies, it is no wonder you are experiencing what you are experiencing “on the ground”.
My latest article says it this way:
https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2016/11/12/the-great-societal-paradox-action-that-defies-principled-beliefs/
“Most people behave subjectively even when trying to be objective, so how can truth be anything more than a tool as it is currently used; as the means to an end? In that context, when truths aren’t arguably beneficial they are ignored, so truths aren’t truths at all. Thus, people reflecting on real truths deliberately miss the point, because, otherwise, the point would assuredly come back to bite in all sorts of guises. If that was to happen, consequences, naturally, would be dire. Arguers would not only look stupid but, God forbid, truth would highlight their only sane way out of it; their only way forward would ensure lateral changes or reversals of opinions was the singular congruous option.
Of course, if heeded properly, that grand watershed would assuredly snowball into a domino effect negotiating changes of stance left, right and centre. Though, maybe most importantly, the metamorphosis could not be complete without different routines and different lives. Perhaps I can present this in a different way. People that vote in elections go through the motions. They vote for ideals that never materialise because of their addiction to personal conventions. Where these conventions originated is a whole ‘nother discussion, of course. From the idealistic standpoint, the mere act of solidarity with self transcends the result. The fact that the ideals never materialised, nor could they underscores the paradox between “belief for beliefs’ sake” and manifest reality.
That is why the whole voting mechanism is built on the fundamentals of exclusion. Do you think the “powers” are stupid? They knew the gig was up long before the people had thought they had figured the significance of slavery. Governments monopolise standards and academia to ensure their chosen corporations are mostly given a free commerce reign and only “A trackers” have influence and money for the “training” required for decent jobs, with scant exception. Some argue the last real politician was John F Kennedy. Now, for certain, there are only “theory touting” plastic candidates with reprepared scripts that confound the right messages the wrong way or make the wrong messages seem bizarrely palatable. All candidates work from identical policy schedules, so choice is reduced to individual personalities, social backgrounds and particular brands of “body odour”. In conjunction with this, vane, intellect wanton reasoning limits all jargon to “any fool can see it” rhetoric or, put more succinctly, this sort of “candour” is only for fools.”
Best
OT
In my experience and years of discernment, truth has a taste, a sound, a feel of simplicity that defies chaotic, convoluted “reasoning.”
Great comment, Joy.
Now you know why “professionals” quickly learn the best way to stay ahead of the pack is to complicate things. Even Richard Branson recognises that.
Didn’t he say (words to the effect), “Any fool can manufacture complexity. Show me simplicity is what I say. There you witness genius”?