Zika hoax: strategy of liars, house of cards

by Jon Rappoport

July 1, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

The entire platform of “proof” that the Zika virus causes a birth defect called microcephaly has descended into gibberish.

I’m not going to recapitulate all my Zika-hoax articles here. Suffice to say, researchers have only established a very weak correlation between the presence of Zika and the occurrence of microcephaly.

This weak correlation is actually evidence that Zika has nothing to do with microcephaly.

But now, we’re in the “expansion” phase. Medical bureaucrats at the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO), knowing they’re standing on quicksand, knowing they’re nothing more than professional liars, are executing a familiar cover story.

They’re claiming that Zika causes a number of other conditions in babies. They’re ranging all over the map. Zika can cause smaller heads in babies with no brain damage, or brain damage without smaller heads? Or paralysis? Or who knows what else…

Later addiction to ice cream? The desire to play outdoors? Interest in cowboys and Indians? Love of Law & Order reruns?

By smearing the possible conditions Zika can cause from the North Pole to the tip of Argentina—with nothing more than very weak correlations in each instance—the plan is to give the impression that Zika is creating a great deal of damage.

But as I’ve pointed out, weak correlation A plus weak correlation B plus weak correlations C,D,E, and F equal overall Weak Correlation, not actual evidence of a causal connection.

Smoke and mirrors equals smoke and mirrors.

If researchers claimed that teenagers eating spinach caused the flu, and cited populations in France, England, Iceland, and New Zealand, where, respectively, 15%, 20%, 2%, and 10% of teens with flu had eaten spinach—and asserted that the “widespread” occurrence of flu-with-spinach was “proof” of a causal connection, you would see the fallacy and the fraud immediately.

So see the fraud here. It’s the same nonsense. The same absurdity.

And keep in mind the potential for big profits from a Zika vaccine.

“It’ll protect your baby from the effects of a virus that causes nothing.”

The birth defect called microcephaly is nothing new. Neither is the presence of the Zika virus, which was discovered in 1947 and has never been known to create more than mild transient discomfort.

The only brain problem associated with Zika occurs in those people who buy what the press is blathering about Zika.

Nothing new there, either.

power outside the matrix

Here’s a recent “oops” Zika revelation:

“New doubts on Zika as cause of microcephaly.” ScienceDaily, 24 June 2016.

Source: New England Complex Systems Institute

“Brazil’s microcephaly epidemic continues to pose a mystery — if Zika is the culprit, why are there no similar epidemics in other countries also hit hard by the virus? In Brazil, the microcephaly rate soared with more than 1,500 confirmed cases. But in Colombia, a recent study of nearly 12,000 pregnant women infected with Zika found zero microcephaly cases. If Zika is to blame for microcephaly, where are the missing cases?”


But don’t worry. The CDC and WHO will explain what’s happening in Colombia. They’ll say Zika causes other conditions there. For example, the disorder known as irrational fear of US planes spraying highly toxic pesticides to eradicate coca fields, and also resentment against multinational corporations that have been gobbling up land and resources.

You see, Zika infects the brain and causes these unwarranted hallucinations…

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

This entry was posted in zika.

7 comments on “Zika hoax: strategy of liars, house of cards

  1. voza0db says:


    Well, you are going to enjoy this!

    Now “scientists” from “Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro e do Instituto de Pesquisa Professor Joaquim Amorim Neto” are saying that the cause is probably due to ZIKA and BVDV (bovine viral diarrhea virus)!


    It’s a good reason to say “Holy shit”!

    BE 😎

  2. Dan says:

    LOL I musta been bitten by a Zika mosquito…. it’s making me think putting larvicide in drinking water might cause birth defects. Or that the GMO mosquitos would be a perfect vector for a biological weapon.

    The Zika story is too absurd and too coordinated. It may be a sophisticated psyop to cover for a bioweapon which has already been deployed. The incompetence excuse only goes so far.

  3. “Brazil’s microcephaly epidemic continues to pose a mystery” No, it’s not a mystery. There is no epidemic. The whole epidemic, the virus, the hype: it’s all been invented in a WHO conference room.

    So why was Brazil the target of the hype? Because when millions of people leave the country after the Olympics they “will take the virus to their home countries” and you can be 100% sure that soon after that outbreaks will happen all over the world. No babies with small heads will show up, but that doesn’t matter. By then there will be a long list of diseases that are caused by Zika and the virus has become very dangerous for everyone.

    And then…the vaccine will be there to save the world. And the people will line up for it. It’s a clever scheme, but at the same time it’s pretty obvious what’s happening. Well, it’s obvious for those who keep their eyes open and their minds alert.

  4. elxroflife says:

    Sick-a Zika yet? Burden of proof obviously not a concern for liability free vaccine industry.

  5. elnura1 says:

    A comment given by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler on The Vaccine Reaction:

    James Lyons-Weiler
    July 1, 2016 at 12:39 am

    I have it on good authority that (1) MC surge started in Brazil before Zika arrived; (2) the surge started a year after the mandated “Stork” pre-natal program (Data from the national heart study, http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-170639.pdf (3) that Brazil uses whole-cell pertussis to vaccinate the poor (who cannot afford the fee for the clinic), source: Dr. Waldely De Oliveira Dias pers comm to Dr. Lyons-Weiler). Add to that the new use of folic acid w/no MTHFR screening, and the larvicide, and expansion of the use of glyphosate in Brazil – a perfect storm.

    From the report:
    Microcephaly in northeastern Brazil: a review of 16,208 births between 2012 and 2015.

    From Abstract:
    A recent outbreak of microcephaly has been reported from Northeast Brazil. Neither its aetiology, nor its clinical significance has yet been fully established. A complication from an intrauterine infection with the Zika virus (ZIKV) is, thus far, the most explored hypothesis. In Paraíba, one of the nine States within the epicentre of the epidemic, 21 medical centres collaborate, via telemedicine since 2012, in a paediatric cardiology network. The Network’s database currently stores in formation on more than 100,000 neonates.
    Microcephaly is a clinical finding and not a disease. It is defined as an occipital-frontal head circumference (OFC) smaller than expected for gestational age and gender.
    This is a descriptive, observational and transverse study, with data from the Círculo do Coração – Paediatric Cardiology and Perinatology Network (RCP-CirCor) Database from Paraíba, in Northeast Brazil.
    Microcephaly criteria utilized:
    In this study, classification of microcephaly was based on three different criteria, as follows:
    1. Brazilian Health Ministry proposed criteria, where microcephaly equals an OFC smaller than 32 cm for term neonates.(6)
    2. Fenton curves, where microcephaly equals an OFC less than -3 standard deviation (SD) for age and gender.(7)
    3. Proportionality criteria, where microcephaly equals an OFC less than ((height/2) + 10) ± 2.(8)
    Statistical analysis:
    The software R were used for data analysis, which included Friedman as the statistical model for hypothesis determination with the confidence interval of 95%.

    Between Dec 1st and 31st 2015, OFC was collected from 16,208 neonates, born between January 1st 2012 and December 31st 2015, in
    21 different public health centres from Paraíba. There was an even distribution of gender, most of them were term babies, weighting over 3,000g and measuring over 45cm at birth. Table 1 describes the population.
    Temporal distribution :
    The distribution of cases of microcephaly between 2012 and 2015 is observed in Fig. 1. A temporal oscillation is observed which is concordant in all three criteria. The numbers are greater than expected since the end of 2012 and with its sharpest peak in mid-2014. However when only the extreme cases of microcephaly are considered a significant (p=0.001) increase in numbers is observed in recent months as shown on Figure 2.

    Discussion: (in the body of the discussion)
    The first question to be addressed is the real incidence of microcephaly in Northeast Brazil. The discrepancy from the expected and found cases may reflect the condition’s major sub-notification in the official sites in recent years coupled with an even greater
    epidemiological crisis than presumed or simple the need to revise the diagnostic criteria for the condition. The numbers of very extreme cases of microcephaly, for instance, while significantly increasing over the last few months, are much smaller and until recently fell within the expected ranges for the worldwide reported incidence.
    (I think this is the most reveling information to date and Jon Called it with the wording of the various press releases)
    Currently, the association with the ZIKV infection is the most explored possibility. Evidence of perinatal transmission of ZIKV(10)together with its strong neurotropism(11) and its documentation in amniotic fluid of foetuses with microcephaly(4) are factors that favour this hypothesis.

    However, if the ZIKV were indeed introduced in Brazil at the World Cup in mid 2014(12), the outbreak of microcephaly would have preceded it. ZIKV has been identified in Africa over 50 years ago, and neither there nor in the outbreaks outside Africa, such an association with microcephaly has been reported(13). However, recently ZIKV has been associated to a number of conditions including Guillain-Barrè syndrome during a recent outbreak of the infection in the French Polynesia(10).

    Read the entire report at the link above.

  6. Emery says:

    Please reference:

    1) Rasmussen et al, New England Journal of Medicine 4/13/2016

    Epidemiological evidence – causal relationship between prenatal ZIKV infection and microcephaly/other sever brain abnormalities

    2) Miner et al, Cell 165 (2016): 1-11

    Murine in utero transmission model of ZIKV infection – infection of placental cells and intrauterine growth restriction/infection and injury of fetal brain

    3) Li et al Cell Stem Cell 19 (2016): 1-7

    ZIKV replicates efficiently in murine embryonic brain – infects neural progenitor cells and leads to microcephaly/causes cell cycel arrest and defects in differentiation

    4) Cugola et al, Nature 2016

    Brazilian ZIKV strain can cross the placenta and inhibit fetal growth; disrupts growthh and causes murine brain cell death in vitro

Comments are closed.