New Zealander of the Year: refuse vaccines, lose money

New Zealander of the Year: refuse vaccination, lose money

Naturally, he’s a doctor

by Jon Rappoport

April 17, 2015

Following in the footsteps of Australia (see: Australia: refuse vaccination, lose $15,000), 2014 New Zealander of the Year, Dr. Lance O’Sullivan, wants to punish people who don’t get vaccinated.

The New Zealand Herald (4/15) reports in “Leading GP [general practitioner (medical doctor)] Lance O’Sullivan: Parents ‘compelled’ to vaccinate”:

“A leading New Zealand doctor has called on the Government to follow Australia’s example to cut child welfare payments to families who do not vaccinate their children, saying the policy would help protect the most vulnerable in our society.”

O’Sullivan should know better. He works with poverty-stricken families. He leads an initiative to build houses for the poor. (I encourage you to read the above referenced New Zealand Herald article in its entirety).

The issue is not vaccines, when it comes to illness among his patients.

It’s weakened immune systems. Which means: lack of nutritious food; lack of proper sanitation; overcrowding; poverty; pollution; in the case of indigenous peoples, stolen land; toxic medical drugs and yes, toxic vaccines.

It doesn’t matter how much medical care you force on people living in these circumstances. They will get sick. They will suffer. They will die.

Vaccines might obscure the visible symptoms of some diseases and allow doctors to conclude the shots are working, but a) the vaccines are actually increasing the toxic load on the body; b) the people who are vaccinated will inevitably break out with new symptoms; and c) the vaccines won’t cure the obvious reasons (listed above) for immune-system suppression.

You can’t substitute vaccines for the factors that actually strengthen immune systems. That’s a fairy tale.

Dr. O’Sullivan is whistling in the dark. He needs to go back and rethink his entire education. It failed to provide him with basic facts.

The circumstances of life in which his patients find themselves are causing dire illness. There is no way around that. There is no mystery about that. There is no final medical solution for that.

The idea that doctors moving into areas where, for generations, people have lived on the margins—and making medicine substitute for the essentials of health—that notion is absurd.

“Here, son. You don’t have nutritious vegetables and protein to eat, but I’ll give you a shot in the arm.”

A fantasy. A myth.

As for people in New Zealand who do have the essentials of life—good clean food, clean water, a warm home, plus money—guess what? Unless they abuse themselves with junk food and drugs, unless they’re exposed to toxic factors in their environment (e.g., pesticides), they’re in the process of strengthening their immune systems.

They don’t need vaccines in order to ward off illness. When children get sick, they’ll undergo a full and acute inflammatory response, recover, and their immune systems will be stronger.

These matters aren’t hard to understand. They’re only made more complex by the medical system, which needs sickness to survive.

My vote for persons of year in New Zealand are all the people who understand these simplicities and are willing to stand up for them.

The attack dogs for the vaccine manufacturing complex are on the move, worldwide. They’re saying and doing whatever they can to keep populations hypnotized and walled off from the truth about vaccines. They’re trying to pass more stringent legislation eliminating vaccine exemptions. They’re aiming to coerce everyone and eliminate freedom and choice.

They’re saying, as Dr. O’Sullivan does: We’re doing this for your own good. You don’t see that, but it doesn’t matter. We do. And we’re going to take control.

Don’t let this happen. Don’t fall for it.

power outside the matrix

Wherever you go in the world, extreme poverty and everything that goes along with it cause illness. It’s not a matter of “finding reasons for sickness” behind the obvious. The medical system and its promises actually function as a cover story and a distraction.

I’ve been writing about this issue since 1987. The people who could eliminate the conditions that cause illness and death in poverty-stricken don’t do it. They appoint task forces to do studies and make reports.

Clean up contaminated water supplies? Restore good growing land for local farming? Eliminate overcrowding? Improve sanitation? Somehow, these projects never go all the way. They fade.

Instead, doctors bring medicines and vaccines—as if their lack were the reason for suffering and disease in the first place.

If Dr. O’Sullivan lived as his patients live for five or 10 years, he could dose himself with all the medical drugs and vaccines he wants to—and he would still sink into chronic illness. To imagine otherwise is the height of folly.

All doctors, when they offload their indoctrination, realize this. All public health agencies know this.

“Well, we may not be able to eliminate poverty yet, but in the meantime we can eliminate disease with vaccines.”

No. No you can’t. The symptoms of one disease may decline, but another disease will pop up. It’s all because—can we understand this, once and for all—people who live in conditions of poverty soon develop weak immune systems and lose their ability to fight off chronic illness.

The body doesn’t lie. It tells its story. Medical fantasies notwithstanding, the corporate desire to make huge profits from selling drugs and vaccines notwithstanding, the body tells it story.

When, after decades, doctors refuse to face facts, they become part of the problem. They aid and abet the continuance of the problem. They bar the door to the solution.

As Ivan Illich wrote, in his 1977 classic, Medical Nemesis:

“The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.”

Things are not as complicated as they seem. Most doctors don’t and won’t understand the simplicities.

But we can.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

14 comments on “New Zealander of the Year: refuse vaccines, lose money

  1. Sherry Bailey says:

    Belated Blessed Birthday Jon!!! Thank You For All You Post For All of US!!!

  2. CDC WATCHER says:

    I’m sure you’ve read this story by now.

    Remember the CDC top “scientist” involved in the scandal with the whistle blower?

    Well that top CDC leader just left the CDC to head Merck’s vaccine division!!!

    Yes, she’s probably facing a subpoena should the whistle blower thing run its true course, and [with no shame in her game] she up and leaves for MERCK!

    This sounds like a soap opera plot–but it’s reality!

    I’m waiting to hear your sure to be excellent coverage of this, Jon.


  3. Elsa says:

    The Pharma criminals have their tentacles everywhere. In Kuwait, they were proposing a fine and 6 month prison sentence for those who refused to be jabbed with poisons

  4. carolynemas says:

    Genocide of the poor.

  5. It’s that fundamental catholic upbringing
    …the biblical genesis/evolutionary science cognitive dissonance… bugga’s the head mate. That and father O’Sullivan…sorry. That wasn’t supposed to get out. He simply went to catholic college, father O’Sullivan isn’t his real father…he is…he is his spiritual father.
    As Lance would say, did say…
    “Having attended a Maori Catholic boarding school, I realised the importance of faith. I regained important values that I lost. Those values underpinned my work in helping those in need. I guess these comes through from the aspect of my Catholic upbringing.”
    – doctor Lance


    The catholic fathers beat the crap out of me every day. Because I was a Maori. They made me hate and loath myself. They made me frigid because I touched my happy place too many times, especially when they weren’t looking. I am now as fucked up as these religious zealots and aim to take my Doctor Megele education to poor people and bloody well fuck them up too.

  6. ozziethinker says:

    I don’t think they realise how serious this is. There has been a prolonged history of change to the regulations as to who is “eligible” for social security in Australia. Also, now all “court debts” must be paid on renewal of driving licenses (and this is a different, lengthy, discussion). The Abbott government has been pushing for the [effective] removal of social security.

    I occasionally comment on MSN and my response to the liberal rhetoric of the time was “is the government planning to bring back the gallows and the gibbet?” and I reminded the writer of head Victoria times (free of social security) when land owners were at war with “thieves”.

    My comment was not approved!

    Last year or the year before, there was a big media expose against a New Zealand woman (from memory) who did not want mainstream (Chemo?) treatment for her son’s cancer. Her estranged husband did. Of course she was the “devil” and he won. I think they’ve knighted him now…..[joke].

    They’re desperate. Prepare for much nastiness ahead….!


  7. K says:

    This is a medical doctor encouraging the abuse of Human Rights in New Zealand. Not only is this offensive, it is illegal.

    Furthermore, a sizable portion of beneficiaries have been subjected to some form of abuse. In many cases, a benefit was their only option to get away from the control exerted upon them. The affect of such a policy if it should be implemented would be to reinforce a sense of powerlessness and loss of control. This can’t be in the best interests of those who are already vulnerable.

    I hope Dr O’Sullivan carefully reconsiders his position on this issue because, as I see it, there is little difference in a medical doctor asserting power over choices with vaccines, vs choices over sterilisation, or anything else.

    Choice and responsibility are the most important factors in any situation.

    And, if that wasn’t enough, the statistics don’t even indicate non vaccination is an issue specific with low income households (ref

  8. dave says:

    In the 1990s the NZ government hired an “EXPERT” to work out what was the minimum amount of food/ nutrition someone could live on. Benefits were adjusted to fit the results.
    These smirking meat heads do my head in.

  9. dave says:

    On another note, on a trip to the mall today (in NZ) I saw at least 3 boys who had some sort of Autism, and lots and lots of sick overweight / underweight people who had dead eyes.
    The chemist in the mall is advertising that they will give you your flu shot.
    Also the amount of elderly people getting some kind of dementia is just off of the charts, “oh yes so and so has gotten the dementia”.
    Old brain + Flu shots + low fat diet= Death.

  10. jacobite2015 says:

    Great post Jon! Your explanation of how the immune system functions and the hard reality of the consequences of severe immune suppression due to poor nutrition, unsanitary conditions, toxic chemical exposure, etc., is very informative.

    Of course, the sciencblogs with their self-proclaimed immune system experts, pediatricians, pharma shills, etc., will continually try to scare parents with their statistics of how many children die every year of VPD in third-world countries. But….wait these so-called “experts” neglect to tell us of the chronic immune system suppression affecting these children due to malnutrition, unsanitary conditions, toxic chemicals and so on. With such a chronically suppressed immune system even a minor cut could be disastrous to these children. It’s too bad that more people don’t understand the foundation of a healthy immune system (proper nutrition being the cornerstone) and the basics of naturally acquired immunity.

    Your right there is a major offensive going on with the vaccine industrial complex. Noticeably, it’s happening with a major battleground in California in reference to SB277. I would to give a shout-out to those good folks in Cal who are opposing the bill, and like you Jon, aren’t afraid to take on the pro-vaccine/anti-choice mind-controlled puppets.

  11. Padre says:

    The Aboriginies of Australia are the most heavily vaccinated group in the world, yet their disease rates are 100% higher than their white counterparts. The Article is dead on.

  12. I know what a channel changer is for, every time a commercial for a new drug comes on, I change it, one will notice how many there are… and in each one, in fast speak, “side effects include dissyness, fainting, on and on, your feet may fall , you may lose your sight, but the viagra works…and for Gods sake, dont think, we will do that for you, trust us, is another well used line. I just finished a battle with cancer, my wife, cured her with no chemo, so yes, PH, is the key, and it works. One does not have to poison themselves, to kill the cancer cell.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *