The Ebola hoax: questions, answers, and the false belief in the “One It”

The Ebola hoax: questions and answers

by Jon Rappoport

October 22, 2014

“The Reality Manufacturing Company doesn’t just sell ‘fake paintings’ that are easy to spot. No. They also sell images that are geared to mesh with people’s deeply held instincts and thereby produce rigid false beliefs. People are sure that if they gave up such beliefs, their world would fall apart and blow away in the wind.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Q: Among intelligent people, what’s the biggest barrier to understanding hoaxes pertaining to viruses?

A: Many people will tell you they see through the lies of consensus reality. They know all about them. But when you bring up a virus, and you say there is no reason to suspect a so-called outbreak is caused by a virus, they back away. They can’t imagine that kind of lie. They can’t conceive that such a lie is being told.

Q: Why?

A: They accept, as fact, what medical authorities tell them on that subject. Some people connect “the killer virus” with what they already know about high-level elites who are out to control and diminish and debilitate populations. So “killer virus” and “spreading destruction” fit that picture. Therefore, they automatically buy “the virus.”

In fact, and this is odd, there are people who categorically reject almost everything doctors and medical authorities tell them—but they choose to accept this one: the virus. They choose to believe that when the authorities say, “We have an outbreak and it’s caused by the Ebola virus,” it must be true. Very strange.

Q: The word “outbreak” is strong.

A: Yes. People, again, automatically, associate it with a virus. Movies play a role there. But when you stop and think about it, “outbreak” just means, if it means anything at all, that a number of people in the same general geo-area have become sick. A toxic chemical, for example, could cause that. A vaccine campaign could cause that.

Q: When a number of people who, say, live together become ill, the assumption is there must be a transmission of a virus from person to person.

A: Right. But that isn’t necessarily the case. It isn’t person A, then person B, then person C—it’s all of them being exposed to the same conditions. For instance, if you had 42 people all living in filth with no hope, no money, no job, and they were also exposed to a toxic chemical, and their bodies were breaking down from starvation, and they all became ill, would you call that “transmission?” Of course not.

Q: Considering US and European and African Ebola patients as a whole, don’t they prove that Ebola is caused by a virus and these patients caught the virus?

A: No. As I’ve demonstrated before, the most widely used diagnostic tests for Ebola (antibody and PCR) are unreliable, useless, and irrelevant. Therefore, to assume these patients have Ebola is unwarranted.

To say a patient has Ebola MEANS he tested positive on a reliable and relevant diagnostic procedure. It doesn’t mean anything else.

Q: What made the US and European Ebola patients sick?

A: That can only be answered by a comprehensive examination done on each patient, by an honest and competent researcher, who can, if necessary, go outside conventional assessments and consider, for example, exposure to toxic chemicals, prior treatment with toxic drugs, and other factors that most doctors ignore. The point is, you don’t discover why somebody became sick or died by saying, “What else could it be? It must be Ebola.” That question and answer reveal a titanic lack of understanding.

Q: You’re saying these US European and US patients, and some health workers, may not have been previously healthy?

A: Right. But why speculate? Why not dig in and find out in each case?

When I was writing AIDS INC., I studied a CDC report on the “first five cases of AIDS,” in Los Angeles hospitals. All five men purportedly had no immune systems left. They were called “previously healthy,” and the conclusion was there must have been a virus that wrecked their immune systems and killed them. This conclusion was widely accepted. The doctors and researchers said, “What else could it be?”

But in reading over the report, I found a number of non-viral reasons. It was easy to see that these men were far from “previously healthy.” For instance, a history of dosing with toxic medical and/or street drugs was a huge red flag. Those drugs are immunosuppressive. The rush to judgment—claiming a virus had killed them—was totally unwarranted.

Q: It’s rather mind boggling to consider that the diagnostic tests for Ebola are irrelevant and useless.

A: Without a reliable diagnostic test, there is no reason to say a person has Ebola. And of course, once an “Ebola” patient is in doctors’ hands, we don’t know what treatments he’s getting. The drugs, some of them experimental, could be highly toxic. Then the patient gets very sick, and the doctors say, “It’s Ebola.”

Q: The link between Ebola patients in West Africa and the Ebola patients in the US and Europe—that’s an important factor, isn’t it?

A: It’s important for one reason. It convinces the public that the so-called viral epidemic is real, it travels, and it is a threat, globally. It’s the capper. It sways people’s minds. But think about it. If, in Africa and the US and Europe, you have the same useless diagnostic tests being run, what do you really have? Assumptions, propaganda, and fear mongering. And you also have a cover story (the virus) for corporate and government and pharmaceutical crimes.

Q: OK. What are the two useless and irrelevant diagnostic tests being done on people, to see whether they have Ebola?

A: Let’s start with the antibody test. Two problems. First, the test is notorious for what’s called “cross-reactions.” That means the test isn’t really registering, in this case, the presence of Ebola virus. It’s registering one of a whole host of other factors. For example, in the past the patient received a vaccine, and that triggers a falsely positive reading now.

Q: What’s the second problem?

A: The antibody test doesn’t say whether a person was sick, is sick, or will get sick. At best, if there are no cross-reactions, it merely says the person had contact with the virus in question. So a positive antibody test for Ebola is far from saying “this person has Ebola disease.” That’s a lie. In fact, before 1985, the general conclusion from positive antibody tests was: this is a good sign; the patient’s immune system contacted the germ and threw it off, defeated it.

Q: What about the PCR test for Ebola?

A: This test is prone to many mistakes, starting with the tiny, tiny sample of material taken from the patient. Is it really genetic material, and is that material really a piece of a virus, or is it just a piece of general and irrelevant debris? The test itself takes that tiny sample and amplifies it millions of times so it can be observed. Assuming it is actually Ebola virus, or a fragment of Ebola virus, there is no indication there is enough of the virus in the patient’s body to make him sick. There have to be millions upon millions of active virus in the patient’s body to begin to say that virus is causing problems. The PCR test says nothing about that. In fact, why was it necessary to do the PCR test at all? If the patient had enough Ebola virus in his body to cause illness, there was no need to search for a tiny fragment of a hoped-for Ebola virus, to start the PCR test. The virus would have been everywhere.

Q: People who use the PCR say it is “quantitative.” In other words, it can not only reveal whether a particular virus is in a person’s body, it can reveal “viral load,” meaning how much of the virus is in the body.

A: Yes, I know what they say. However, the inventor of the PCR, Kary Mullis, puts it succinctly: quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. The test isn’t geared to detect quantity. For an analogy, imagine someone comes into your home and notices you are watching a This Old House rerun. He suddenly infers that 500,000 people are also watching it at this moment.

Q: What are some of the non-virus reasons people in West Africa are dying?

A: First of all, you need to know that these non-virus causes can create the symptoms that are attributed to Ebola. Fever, fatigue, sweating, bleeding, vomiting, diarrhea.

In West Africa, you’re simultaneously looking at severe malnutrition, starvation, massive displacement by war, grinding poverty, lack of basic sanitation, open sewage, overcrowding in living quarters, highly toxic organophosphate pesticides in growing fields and indoors (spraying against mosquitos in homes and clinics—which causes bleeding)), vast overuse of antibiotics (shreds digestive systems and causes hemorrhaging), other toxic unrefrigerated medical drugs, toxic industrial pollution, vaccine campaigns that push immune systems already on the edge over the cliff.

Q: What about the non-virus factors that have made health workers sick and killed them in West Africa?

A: Again, you need to analyze every case uniquely. But health workers are wearing hazmat suits sealed off from the outside, and they’re taking one-and-two hour shifts in those boiling suits, losing an astonishing five liters of body fluid in an hour. Then they come out, take off the suits, rehydrate, douse themselves with toxic disinfectants, and go back in soon for another shift and lose more body fluids. In one case, a doctor stated toxic chlorine was actually inside his haz-mat suit with him while he worked. What I’m describing here could cause anyone to collapse.

If we can believe the scattered reports that many health workers in West Africa are dying at a very, very high rate, then I have to say something is wrong with those reports.

Q: Why?

A: Because if we were talking about a real viral outbreak as the cause, at that rate of death among health workers, the rest of West Africa would be seeing hundreds of thousands of deaths by now. So either the reports of deaths among health workers are false, or if they’re true, somebody or something which is non-viral is killing them. It’s that simple.

Q: What do you have to say about charges that the Ebola virus has been worked on, to weaponize it as an instrument of biowar?

A: People have to realize that, for quite some time, researchers in the US and other countries have been working on many germs, trying to weaponize them. The act of trying is not the same as the act of succeeding. It isn’t a walk in the park. You don’t just get a grant, stick your hand into a pile of viruses and massage them. Biowar researchers are no different from other medical researchers. They inflate their results, they promise breakthroughs, they lie about progress, they say and do anything to keep the research money flowing in their direction.

Let me give you an example from the field of cancer research at the US National Institutes of Health. Forty, fifty years ago, virologists were desperate to prove that a certain class of viruses cause cancer. It was their field. They were working with monkeys. So they radiated the monkeys, they poisoned them with chemicals, they injected them with all sorts of germs that were irrelevant to the specific research at hand. Why did they do all this, and more? Because they wanted to destroy the monkeys’ immune systems and render them as vulnerable as possible. THEN they injected them with the viruses that were supposed to cause cancer. That’s what these “researchers” did. And they called it science. And even then, they failed miserably, and the whole cancer project was shut down.

So when you read an article about possible biowar research on Ebola in West Africa, don’t automatically assume, if it took place, that it was successful.

And again, if people were dosed with “a biowar form of Ebola,” it would be possible to do a straightforward test to see if these people have enough of the virus in their bodies to cause disease. But the workable tests aren’t being done, so claiming all these people are dying of Ebola is a completely and utterly insupportable assertion.

A strong and healthy person’s immune system is remarkably resilient and capable. Saying, “Oh well, I’m sure they designed a virus that can slip past the body’s defense system,” just like that, poof, is simply a random opinion.

Yes, people should continue to research the possibility that Ebola has been weaponized successfully. Again, just remember: “worked on in a lab” doesn’t automatically equal “they succeeded.” And also remember, the “chemical” part of biological-chemical warfare is much, much easier, to do. It’s far more effective and predictable.

Q: You’re saying that the image of a single killer virus infecting people and spreading all over the globe can be an illusion.

A: Of course. In the case of Ebola, the epidemic is completely unproven.

Q: What about the possibility that prior vaccine campaigns in West Africa are the real cause of what’s being called Ebola?

A: As I’ve indicated, when you give standard vaccines to people whose immune systems are already on the verge of collapse, for the reasons I’ve listed above, a vaccine can apply the death blow. But in that case, it’s not just the vaccine. Trying to explain why people are dying in West Africa from just one cause is the wrong approach. They were dying already from the combination of immune-suppressing factors.

Q: There is always the chance that an extra toxic element was added to a vaccine.

A: Yes. And every vaccine that has been given in West Africa in the last ten years should be analyzed very carefully. But don’t expect medical officials to make that happen. It would have to be done independently.

The Matrix Revealed

Q: There is a kind of fixation on attributing one cause and one cause only to a situation where people are ill and dying in a given region.

A: That’s part of a larger human tendency, and it’s not a good one. It’s a self-deceiving instinct.

For many centuries, organized religions, constructed by elites bent on control of the masses, have built whole cosmologies on the basis of the “single good cause” vs. “the single evil cause.” It’s worked, too, because people tend to fall in line behind that formulation.

And how many nations have been taken into misery and suffering behind the notion that The One, the great leader, has emerged to rule the people.

If you read the US Constitution and earlier documents based on the idea of individual freedom, you see that The One is firmly rejected. Those documents are all about decentralization of power.

The problem is, not enough people are ready for the decentralized “many”; they prefer to look for, and attach themselves to, The One.

Q: The notion of the single germ-cause illustrates this?

A: It’s yet another case in which people, unthinkingly, attach themselves to The One. They have to have it. They need it, like a drug. They believe it so deeply, they absolutely refuse to consider any other possibility. I’ve received emails from people who say, “Your articles are very interesting, but of course I know this is an epidemic caused by the Ebola virus.” They don’t know. They believe. They accept what they’re being told.

Q: Just to be clear, you’re saying we shouldn’t accept the premise that the US and European “Ebola cases” really have the Ebola virus.

A: Not unless, in each case, the actual virus is found and extracted from their bodies and isolated. That’s step one. Step two is, the virus is found in great quantity in the person.

Q: Why is quantity important?

A: Because you need millions and millions of an active virus to even begin to say that virus is causing disease in a person.

Q: Are you saying that this so-called outbreak is just a natural event, and no one is at fault?

A: Hell no. All those horrendous killer conditions that exist in West Africa? They’re MAINTAINED, to keep people weak and unable to resist the corporate and financial takeover of their resource-rich countries. And the virus is the “blame-free” cover story, behind which that takeover is accelerating.

Do you have any idea how easy it is to invent the false reality of a viral epidemic? You want a conspiracy theory? Imagine this. You’ve already got huge numbers of people dying in West Africa, for the reasons I’ve mentioned above. Bad actors just need a relatively small bump, to claim there is an “outbreak.”

Toxic chemical. They seed a few areas with a chemical. Undetectable, unless you’re looking for it. Ups the death rate.

“Outbreak! Outbreak!” “The killer virus!” “We need a (toxic) vaccine!” “We need quarantines!” “Fear the virus!” “It can spread anywhere!” “Seal the borders!” “Bring in American troops—new staging area for US Africom!” “Fear in the US!” “Quarantines!” “Economic losses everywhere—tourism, air travel.” “Bring the IMF to West Africa—new deal—millions in loans to fight Ebola, in return for selling your country wholesale (again) to elite financiers and corporations.” “Poison some health workers and a few people traveling to the US and Europe, call it the virus.” “Pandemic! The virus can be spread anywhere!”

The bad actors already know the standard tests will falsely come up positive for Ebola—no problem there.

It’s that simple. Creating the appearance of an epidemic is that simple.

Q: Is that what was done with SARS?

A: As one WHO microbiologist, Frank Plummer, innocently revealed (he wasn’t clued in on the script), the so-called coronavirus, the reputed cause of SARS, couldn’t even be found in most of the patients diagnosed with SARS. The cause wasn’t even there. Didn’t stop WHO or the CDC from continuing to promote SARS as a deadly epidemic. And people still clung to the idea of The One—the virus.

Q: What about HIV?

A: Never proved to cause any human disease. The same antibody tests were used there. As journalist Christine Johnson brilliantly documented, there were at least 60 reasons why the HIV blood test came up positive, and none of them had anything to do with HIV.

Of course, the people who were diagnosed positive were then fed an insanely toxic drug, AZT, a failed chemo drug that attacked all cells of the body and had a special affinity for attacking cells of the immune system—the very system that HIV was supposedly attacking. AZT. Killer, killer drug.

The Perth Group of researchers has made an astonishing case for saying that HIV was never even proved to exist.

Just as I’ve done in detailing chronic conditions in West Africa that cause death and disease, in the case of AIDS I’ve laid out (in my book, AIDS INC.) how, for every so-called high-risk group, there are ample non-virus factors that account for all the immune-system suppression called AIDS. In Haitians, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, gay men, Africans, blood-transfusion recipients.

So I’ve been around this block before.

Since 1987, I’ve watched untold numbers of people buy into the one-virus, one-cause idea, thinking they know what they’re talking about. HIV, West Nile, bird flu, SARS, Swine Flu, Ebola. All false. All ops designed for specific reasons.

Modern medicine depends on fake epidemics to condition the masses to following orders, complying, living in fear, ingesting toxic medical drugs and vaccines, from cradle to grave.

That makes populations give in—toxified, they’re too weak and confused and debilitated and sick to resist the top-down takeover of their societies.

power outside the matrix

Q: One more time, can you discuss the toxic effects of modern medicine?

A: I’ve mentioned this in many of articles, chapter and verse. There is the Starfield review. Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public-health expert, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. On July 26, 2000, her review was published in the Journal of the American Association: “Is US health really the best in the world?”

Her conclusion? Every year in the US, like clockwork, the medical system kills 225,000 people. 119,000 in hospitals, and 106,000 from FDA-approved medical drugs.

That’s 2.25 MILLION medically-caused deaths per decade. Just in the US. And that doesn’t count severe non-fatal adverse reactions to the drugs, of which there are millions more, every year.

As for vaccines, the whole system of reporting severe adverse reactions, in the US, is broken. Barbara Loe Fisher, of the National Vaccine Information Center, has done the best estimates: between 100,000 and 1.2 million serious adverse consequences from vaccines, every year, in the US.

Fake epidemics breed unthinking fear and loyalty, from cradle to grave…loyalty to THIS system of medical death.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at

This entry was posted in Ebola.

49 comments on “The Ebola hoax: questions, answers, and the false belief in the “One It”

  1. hsaive says:

    Jon…… HOAX is beginning to sound correct. Alleged recent Ebola victim photos are turning up as originating from old ANTHRAX event. — expect a return to Biz as usual

    • Rebecca says:

      I do believe the media is rigging this; too much photoshopping not to, especially the weird crap about Adhoka, this new NYC doctor [Dr. Spencer], and Brantley all being 33. Really? Brantly jumping out of back of ambulance like he was ready for a job, same with Vinson going up the plane steps, and some photos of Brantley in US and White House really look photoshopped.

      HOWEVER, something is going on, people ARE dying over there, so from what? Chemical weapons with a slow kill, release? I have worked in healthcare (hospital) for decades and you cannot telll me that bacteria, viruses, parasites are not real. Nor cancer, it’s real. You going to tell me it’s not real now, too.

      The shadow government in this country is trying to instill fear, the questions for us to find out are: are there true Ebola cases here?, where are there?, how do we not spread them?,…

      …what exactly is the FEDS next move and steps in their agenda, and how do we best as a people of this country and this world, stop their evil.

      • theodorewesson says:

        Just to add….

        * re: digital photos of inside Dr. Spensor’s apartment — taken from a guy in a full hazmat suit. So, per “ebolie allopathic story land”, would the camera/phone need to them be sanitized? if yes, then what chemicals? (

        * re: “people are dying…. bacteria, viruses, parasites are real… cancer is real”. Yes, people die all the time. What was the person’s nutritional state? How many (chemical) toxins were in his body? Was the person drinking polluted water? eating poor food? (also, Is the “allopathic 150-plus-year old germ-virus theory” really useful on the “front lines”?)

      • Rose says:

        Rebecca, I wonder if you’ve ever read any of the scientific papers in which they claim to have isolated a virus? they’re very tedious, but it becomes clear that what they’ve done is far from isolation: it is mixing a patient sample with a number of other substances, some of which can be sources of genetic materials. Then, without taking anything out of that mix, they search for some genetic sequences and match those up with sequences in a database to “determine” what virus is present.

        There are plenty of toxic chemicals in our air, water and soil (and thus our food, even before processing); there are plenty of nutrient deficiencies in our common diets; there are plenty of physical, mental and emotional traumas in modern life, to account for just about any illness you can name. The illness and disease is indeed present, but is not a result of micro life being at war with macro life.

  2. hsaive says:

    Larger grain of salt needed on these overly-sensational stories. Let’s take a lesson from Naomi Klein’s prediction of “Shock Doctrine – Disaster Capitalism” where the insiders rig the game and the media with fear porn event to pump and dump the market. Maneuvering of Airlines stocks and all travel related futures commodities has now been completed. Back to Biz a usual until next “slime”. —

    • noreloc says:

      the reason folks so readily believe this could be Ebola, is that many have become aware of Agenda 21 and the UN plan for mass depopulation. Ebola may be a hoax NOW- but wait until the herd rushes over the cliff to get vaccinated. With a vaccine ‘accidentally’ laced with LIVE virus. then the herd WILL be infected, and infect those of us who refuse the vaccine.
      in this way? Ebola or some pandemic is a very real threat and has been very publically threatened by the Elite who commit these acts and crimes without blinking.

  3. From Québec says:

    Brilliant exposé!

  4. Thank you for your impeccable research and for being a voice of reason among all the fear mongers. It’s alarming how quickly most of the alternative media ran with “this is THE one.” Useful dupes for the Harmaceutical industry.

  5. Ed Stratford says:

    Great article! Robert Gallo invented ‘HIV’. There is no such thing. As an aside, retroviruses are an important mechanism of evolution as they transfer genetic improvements that are reflected in our genes to our reproductive cells. That’s why they attempt to target them and demonize them. Whatever the media makes the most noise about is usually the biggest lie. They have spent billions convincing the world that HIV is real and now they are spending billions on movies and plastic suits, (props), to convince us that Ebola virus is stronger than our immune systems. Funny that the main thing that empowers our immune system is our belief in it so they have to undermine our belief in order to sell their scams.

    • jarrodschneider says:

      “Funny that the main thing that empowers our immune system is our belief in it so they have to undermine our belief.”
      You said it. The only thing I would add here is that once a person believes this statement and actually applies it to their life, they experience its veracity and their belief becomes a knowing. And once they know this statement, they watch, year after year as those family and friends around them get common colds and other illnesses while they remain totally healthy and thriving. Jon is right to point out that just because a virus is found in someone’s system, this does not necessarily mean they will get sick. But when you operate under the assumption that mere contact with a germ means you develope the full blown sickness associated with said germ, then you are operating, for one, based in fear and two, simultaneously undermining your body’s natural ability to thwart whatever comes your way.

  6. Rumplestiltskin says:

    Wow, is all I can say. I had no idea it went that deep and could be that far ranging. Many thanks for the relief from the hysteria. I will pass this on to all on my E-mail list.

  7. Jim says:

    Exceptional article. Well presented and concise. I have been amazed over the last several decades on the number of ‘killer’ viruses that emerged and the response in the public. People spoke in fear, then when it failed to spread the breathed a sigh of relief. Through each episode of a new virus alert, I saw more people looking towards the ‘vaccines’. Fear grew as if phased on purpose, and I sincerely beleive it is done on purpose. It is easy to scare the hell out of them and make them turn to the “Gov’t” to save them. And the profits keep rolling in. However, a cycle may well begin where a lot of people DO die and the scare is escalated. That is frightening.

  8. Tim Mcgauley says:

    Then you are denying biblical prophecy! Not wise to do that. the KING clearly stated there would be pestilence(s) in the end!! Really wouldn’t see this as a hoax!

    • jeff says:

      Are you saying that “the powers that be” are not a pestilence?

    • From Québec says:

      “Tell people there’s an invisible man in the sky who created the universe, and the vast majority will believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure.”
      ― George Carlin

    • Hmmm bible prophecy doesn’t say who or where the problems come from in the end , So why bring it up …? The one thing WE do know it that someone somewhere is really trying hard to make sure these things happen …. so with that being said prophecy could very well AND I BELIEVE IT DOES describe the ACTIONS OF MAN IN THE LAST DAYS, and not the actions of god himself….. so like I said god really doesn’t need anyones help for validation…. God gave us brains too…. !

  9. Excellent synopsis in this Q&A session. People who are seeking the truth will have ample avenues to approach this abstruse and oft-feared dilemma.

    All of these Ebola posts have helped quell many of the concerns that we had.

    Thanks for this.

  10. Diane says:

    Thanks, Jon. Passing it around, hope it makes a dent.

  11. Stan Tall says:

    Never underestimate what the serpent seed will do, only the Creator of Universes keeps it all together now….The demon seed is out of control and its getting worse by the second…The wicked will make their labmade viruses and then put the same shit in a vaccination and then you’re laid to waste off of believing the lies of the darkside….Plus…you don’t know if they will drop something else out of a plane/chemtrail…..The minions of death are the opposite of life….Evil takes its course now…Oceans being destroyed by Fukushima radiation right now….Everything is chaos…..World on Fire….Brainwashed population…..You’re on the cusp of Armegeddon right now…NWO is the number of the Beast…..

  12. 2tugjug says:

    The Lucie’s are laughing at a populace who believed that sodium fluoride is good for us. Well that fluoride (along w/gmo’s, geo engineering ‘which includes the ha^rp players’, academia & most media etc) has dumb’d (me too) the sucklings down and wouldn’t be surprised if lithium might be used to pacify!
    Four Word’s for the Ill-loom’s, you loose, it’s Written!

    • theodorewesson says:

      You got me thinking,…

      Last night, after reading the following piece from Jon,…

      Missing “Ebola” factor: pesticides in West Africa

      i was “pesticide poisoning” and came upon very disturbing photos of children from india with severe deformities (due acute poisoning in the mother’s womb due to pesticides). (reminded my of the severe deformities in photos of iraqi children (as a result of gulf-war-2 depleted uranium). So grotesque, that nobody would say “genetic disorder”.

      Yes, i am outside the scope of symptoms labeled “ebola-like”, but, then it hit me,…

      in the west, the poisoning is so incremental,… it is a very, very slow soft kill,… that what keeps it going is,… on the one had, ignorance in the general public, and, on the other hand, fraud with certain key allopaths and key scientists — and the monopolistic nature of allopathic medicine and the very deep pockets that fund the research within the “allopathic” framework.

      • says:

        Something just hit me too. Some natives say the deaths create “body melting”. Okay, I have taken care of bleeding out patient (DC or trauma), but they do not have organ melting. Are these people being chemical dessimated???????

  13. jeff says:

    So how did this Eric Duncan’s family not catch Ebola when nurses in protective gear did? Something’s not right here.

  14. From Québec says:

    Jon, check out James Lawrenzi, DO, who has two clinics in Garden City and Archie, Missouri, who appeared on the Alex Jones Show today to warn that the true scale of the situation was being deliberately downplayed to avoid hysteria in the US…lol

    This doesn’t make any sense. Why would they not want us to panick? They need us to panick if they want us to get their vaccines.

    A guy on Prison Planet said that he checked Lawrenzi’s site and that it was created today.

    “…doctor is a fraud ,,I went to his site, it looks legit,,but then I checked the sites properties,,,,it was created today,,,,
    Date Created 10-23-14,,,,,,that date comes up on all pages.

  15. medusajoe says:

    The public needs to be made aware of the criminals in charge of so called health care.

    And of People who are working with them like bill gates gates ,who readily admits a connection between his providing health services to Africa for the first time in a large scale, and the health care he provides miraculously leading to a decline in population

    these people should arrested tried and imprisoned for conspiracy to commit genocide at once and without any delay.
    Like tonight, like yesterday.

  16. medusajoe says:

    Gates continued: “I don’t think people like to say out loud that we want to let these kids die because there are too many of them

    Bill Gates.

    It was only when we found out about this phenomenal connection between improved health and reduced population growth that we felt:
    Great, let’s just make the foundation as big as possible

    Bill Gates

    There are only two possible reasons for this phenomenal connection between improved health and reduced population growth

    1) the health care causes people to die
    2) the health care is a secret sterilisation programme.

    Both are crimes against humanity and categorised as the crime of genocide

    About these ads
    Occasionally, some of your visitors may see Ebola propaganda on the news

  17. medusajoe says:

    Infertility is not a sign of improved health
    Neither is access to tv and bill gates pc’s
    Reducing people to porn addicts who don’t reproduce.
    Bill gates has really contributed to the world so much hasn’t he?
    What a useless example the man in fact is in regards to a role model, when you take the mask off.

  18. ozziethinker says:

    We can argue the toss on the detail, Jon, but ultimately we are of two minds on conclusions. Agreed 100%. Excellent post!

    • johndjasper says:

      I’m confused, ozziethinker. Either you agree 100% and are therefore of one mind, or you disagree significantly enough to be of two minds. In the end, I’m glad that you agree as I believe that Jon has knitted together the facts correctly and drawn the right conclusions from them. :o)

      • ozziethinker says:

        Incorrect John,

        The end justifies the means in this case. Every single point he raised is far more complex than presented; each is myopic though well argued in that simplistic format. In that respect, we can argue the toss on each and every point. Conclusions, nevertheless, are clear and valid. Upon those, we are 100% in agreement.

        “the problem with genius is no one understands it”

  19. Good on Medusa Joe: This is some kinda fun too: > There are quite a few films like this popping up on YouTube. It’s sad. Some of them are rather lame, but. Too much drama? Not enough dead queens?? Not enough good actors???

    Dallas Ivy Apartments, Apartment 614

  20. John says:

    It looks like the comment I made on your previous article hit home Jon. I’m glad you sat up and took notice. This was a much better article, well written and you argued your points very well. Now I can at least understand where you’re coming from. I’ve been reading everything I can on this “Ebola” story, everything from it being bio-engineered to the possibility that what you’ve said is the real cause of the suffering and death.

    I think the best evidence is the so-called “tests”. I read about how the HIV tests are ridiculously inaccurate a few years ago so it didn’t take much for me to realize you brought up a strong point in that area.

    Well done, I have some renewed confidence in the trustworthiness of your writing.

  21. Shane says:

    Great article. Can I share it at where recently posts many Ebola-related polls. If you mind, please let me know.

  22. John says:

    Watched the video of the child taking a dive the other day, same with the guy getting paid. I’m trying to put this all together mentally but it’s tough to come to any concrete conclusions.

    Why? Are they prepping us for another poisonous vaccine? This makes me remember all those plastic “coffin liners” from years ago. I always think to myself, “No, not yet. This isn’t the big one.” but I know it has to come at some point.

    Another video (audio from some radio show) brought up how New York and Connecticut are trying (or have) to declare a state of emergency. In a state of emergency our rights are suspended (all depending on the specific emergency). I believe in New York they have already started threatening people, saying whoever refuses a vaccine will be forced in quarantine. I cannot confirm this as 100% but I find it interesting either way.

    I’d really like to hear some opinions as to why they are faking this and what the reasons may be?

    Thanks Jon.

  23. ej says:


    Great article. I thought I would scan it but I was mesmerized by its depth and logos. I am amazed at the lucidity of your thoughts.

    Couple of questions though. Is the flu and dengue not a virus? And why do antiviral herbs work? Maybe they are working on some other level?

    • theodorewesson says:

      Hi EJ,

      you got me thinking,… outside of an “allopathic laboratory context (‘petri dishes, microscopes, bunsen burners, etc’) – when chasing ‘research’ federal reserve notes (dollars) for ‘lab studies”,… do “allopaths on the front lines — doing eyeball diagnosis and/or blood tests” — let alone naturalpathic doctors, let alone homeopaths, let alone chiropractors, let alone citizens, even need to entertain Louis Pasture’s 150-plus-year-old germ-[virus] theory in their thinking when treating, IN AN HONEST MANNER, an actual dis-ease in an individual at hand?

      same for anti-bodies.

      Germs and virus and anti-bodies. Outside of a lab, are these concepts even useful, or, a detriment?

      • ej says:

        interesting read. its also interesting to read Hulda Clarke who hypothesized all diseases were caused by parasites. maybe the antiviral herbs are in effect immunity boosters.

  24. Steve Stars says:

    Another great analysis Jon. Let me briefly summarize what I think were key points that I fully agree with.
    1. Germ scares bypass logical critique and what is normally healthy skepticism— even among those of us accustomed to questioning authority.
    2. Tests to verify “Ebola infection” are neither available to the public or scientifically sound as Gold Standards of testing that could justify the germ scare to begin with. The result is a consensus of blind trust in medical authority models that have been proven false continually.
    3. Conclusions about the illness and death negate any verification of the “killer germ” being the only cause. I should add here in reference to the original five “AIDS patients”, that the CDC themselves actually did do the background checks on many of the first “AIDS patients” and CONCLUDED early on that the disease was NOT infectious and a result of many immune system threats related to drug use and other recreational drugs among gay men in the fast track lifestyle and IV drug addicts shooting street drugs for 10 years or more. Of course all of this background study and sound epidemiology was abandoned when Robert Gallo and Max Essex found a way to find ONE germ (HIV) as the cause, launch the huge VIRUS WAR and threaten the public at large.
    The result of that story is the 400 Billion (with a B) dollar fraud that prostituted medical science and poisoned millions with AZT to create the “AIDS epidemic”

    Finally, we have more to fear from Germ Scare fanatics in the international health control system than we do any specific germ. But that also gives them an unlimited opportunity to create a biblical plague, blame it on the “specific germ” and then murder billions of people with a myriad of deadly weapons under the umbrella of the ONE germ lie.

  25. “There is still no proof of any medically relevant virus” -Dr. Stefan Lanka

  26. al says:

    Like you set off a ‘Fire-storm!’ al

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *