Ebolagate: 47 questions and answers

#Ebola: 47 questions and answers that will set your hair on fire

by Jon Rappoport

October 3, 2014


I have presented this information, in depth, in other recent articles. Here I present the bare bones.

Q: What is the major psychological factor at work here?

A: Above all else, it is people making an automatic connection between their own frightening image of Ebola and the statement, “So-and-so is sick.”

Q: “Sick” doesn’t automatically=Ebola?

A: That’s right, even when an authority says some person is sick and in the hospital and has Ebola.

Q: Is the Ebola epidemic a fraud, in the same way that Swine Flu was a fraud?

A: In the summer of 2009, the CDC stopped counting cases of Swine Flu in the US.

Q: Why?

A: Because lab tests on samples taken from likely and diagnosed Swine Flu cases showed no presence of the Swine Flu virus or any other kind of flu virus.

Q: So the CDC was caught with its pants down.

A: Around its ankles. It was claiming tens of thousands of Americans had Swine Flu, when that wasn’t the case at all. So why should we believe them now, when they say, “The patient was tested and he has Ebola.” The CDC is Fraud Central.

Q: Where is the fraud now, when it comes to counting Ebola cases and labeling people with the Ebola diagnosis?

A: The diagnostic tests being run on patients—the antibody and PCR tests are most frequently used—are utterly unreliable and useless.

Q: Therefore, many, many people could be labeled “Ebola,” when that is not the case at all?

A: Correct.

Q: But people are sick and dying.

A: People are always sick and dying. You can find them anywhere you look. That doesn’t mean they’re Ebola cases.

Q: In other words, medical authorities can place a kind of theoretical grid over sick and dying people and reinterpret them as “Ebola.”

A: Exactly. The map can be drawn in any number of ways.

Q: Could an “Ebola patient” have other viruses in his body?

A: Of course. Many other viruses. The mere presence of a virus does not mean a person is sick or is going to get sick.

Q: What test needs to be run, in order to say, “This person is sick because of Ebola.”

A: First of all, the Ebola virus would need to be isolated from the patient directly. The two tests I mentioned above are indirect. Then, if Ebola is isolated from the patient directly, a test needs to show that the patient is harboring millions of active Ebola virus—that’s called a test for titer.

Q: Are these procedures being done as a matter of course on people suspected of having Ebola?

A: No.

Q: We’re told that the Dallas Ebola patient was vomiting profusely outside his apartment, before he was sent to the hospital. Isn’t this a symptom of Ebola?

A: It could be a symptom of many things. Some news reports state that the patient had already been to the hospital, where he was given antibiotics and sent home. All classes of antibiotics list nausea and vomiting as adverse effects.

Q: So the symptoms of Ebola, like cough, fever, fatigue, diarrhea—these can be attributed to many causes?

A: Absolutely. The flu, for example.

Q: Now we’re seeing a search operation for contacts of several Ebola patients.

A: This will whip up hysteria to new heights. But where is the proof that the original patients have Ebola?

Q: Again, the original patients are sick.

A: “Sick” does not automatically equal “Ebola.”

Q: What’s killing all those people in West Africa?

A: With the tests being run on them—and many are simply eyeballed and called “Ebola”—there is no proof that any of these people have Ebola.

Q: There are other long-term reasons for death and dying in West Africa?

A: Protein-calorie malnutrition, hunger, starvation, extreme poverty, contaminated water supplies, overall lack of basic sanitation, a decade of horrific war, toxic medical drugs, prior toxic vaccine campaigns, etc.

Q: And the combined effect of these conditions?

A: Destruction of immune systems. Then, any germ that sweeps through the population, a germ that would ordinarily be defeated, instead kills many people. Why? Because the immune system is too weak to respond. With healthy and strong immune systems, the germs would have no significant effect.

Q: What about the health workers in West Africa who have died?

A: Since unreliable diagnostic tests would have been run on them, we don’t have any idea why they died. But at least some of them were suffering greatly from working inside hazmat suits, sealed off from the outside. In a one-hour shift, in boiling heat, they were losing five quarts of body fluid, then coming out, rehydrating, disinfecting with toxic chemicals, putting their suits on again, going back to patients for the next shift, losing extraordinary amounts of body fluid again, and so forth and so on. That would cause anyone to collapse.

Q: But this has to be an Ebola epidemic, with all the press coverage, with statements from the CDC, with announcements from experts.

A: That’s what they said about Swine Flu, which was a dud. This doesn’t have to be Ebola just because official sources say it is.

Q: Let’s get back to the psychological factors involved here.

A: A person has heard all about how dangerous Ebola is. He has a fear of some unknown invisible tiny killer, a virus. He has heard about “bad diseases” coming from Africa. Now, someone from the CDC stands up and talks about the threat of Ebola and says a patient with Ebola is in a Dallas hospital, and is sick. What’s the effect? Utter acceptance of the idea that the hospital patient has Ebola. “It’s Ebola. It couldn’t be anything else.”

Q: But it could be something else?

A: Of course.

Q: People don’t want to accept that, though. They want to believe in the doctors and the CDC and the tests that are run on people to decide if they have Ebola.

A: That belief isn’t based on anything real.

Q: People believe in the power of what they’re told.

A: Yes. It’s interesting to see people who otherwise call the CDC a fraud suddenly accept the CDC’s edict about Ebola. There is no rational substance to that acceptance.

Q: So to be clear, you’re saying there might not be an Ebola epidemic at all.

A: What do you need to determine whether people have Ebola? Accurate diagnostic tests. Accurate tests aren’t being done. So this is an unproven epidemic. And making the assertion of an epidemic is a hoax.

Q: Like the Swine Flu.

A: Exactly. As I said, in the summer of 2009, the CDC stopped counting cases of Swine Flu and yet maintained there was an epidemic. The samples of blood from patients they sent to labs showed, in the overwhelmingly number of cases, that there was no Swine Flu virus present.

Q: And at that time, how many cases of Swine Flu had the CDC already said were present in the US?

A: Tens of thousands.

Q: And what did the CDC do next?

A: Unbelievably, they doubled down and estimated there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US. That’s the level of lying we’re dealing with here. And now, the CDC says Ebola is loose. The diagnostic tests they’re running and relying on are useless. But everybody and his brother believes the CDC.

Q: Again, people dying doesn’t automatically equal Ebola? You’ll hear, “What else could it be? It must be Ebola.”

A: People have all sorts of preconceptions that lead them to say, “It must be Ebola.” Here is the sequence: We hear nothing about people dying. Then the press reports, “People are dying. It’s an outbreak. It’s Ebola.” And that is automatically accepted. Why? Because populations have been tuned up by decades of propaganda to make those connections.

Q: Believing what you say here—this would imply such an enormous level of fraud—it’s unthinkable.

A: No, it’s not unthinkable. Again, for comparison, I refer you to the Swine Flu hoax. That was absolutely staggering. It was exposed by CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson in October of 2009. She published her work on the CBS website. CBS was about to put the story on the Evening News. Then it was stopped. Attkisson was cut off at the knees. Censored.

Q: Why?

A: Because the entire vaccine establishment, including the CDC, which is really a PR agency for pharmaceutical companies, would have been exposed for all to see. By calling Swine Flu an epidemic, millions and millions of Swine Flu shots were given. The CDC, knowing the “epidemic” was a fraud, their own fraud, was pitching the vaccine as if their lives depended on it.

Q: Was the World Health Organization (WHO) involved in the fraud?

A: They started it.

Q: How?

A: As Peter Doshi has written in BMJ Online, in the spring of 2009, with only 20 cases of Swine Flu in the world—20—the WHO declared Swine Flu a “level 6 pandemic,” their highest classification of danger. Not only that, they changed their own definition of “pandemic,” so that it no longer had to mean widespread and severe death and dying. They just changed the meaning of word “pandemic.” Quite Orwellian.

Q: But the US government is buying and distributing hazmat suits. People are being quarantined. There is a hunt for contacts of the Dallas patient. Stories in the press are ramping up fear. All these people couldn’t be wrong.

A: I have condos for sale on the moon. I think you might be an ideal customer.

Q: Speaking of the CDC, a long-term scientist with the agency, William Thompson, recently admitted he committed fraud, when he co-authored a 2004 study that claimed the MMR vaccine had no connection to autism.

A: Thompson had several co-authors from the CDC on that study. They all committed fraud. Consider the conversations that must have taken place at the CDC to arrange that fraud.

Q: Do you think the fraud went all the way to the top of the CDC?

A: In 2004, whistleblower Thompson wrote a letter to Julie Gerberding, the head of the CDC. He warned her he was about to present troubling and sensitive data about the vaccine at an upcoming conference on vaccines and autism. His meaning was clear. He had found a vaccine-autism connection.

Q: What did Gerberding do?

A: She never answered Thompson’s letter, and his presentation at the conference was canceled.

Q: Is Gerberding still the head of the CDC?

A: No. She left the CDC in 2009.

Q: Where is she now?

A: She’s the president of Merck vaccines.

Q: What vaccine do they manufacture?

A: The MMR.

Q: The same vaccine Thompson found had a connection to autism?

A: Yes.

Q: And for 10 years, from 2004 to now, Thompson and his co-authors sat on the knowledge that the MMR vaccine has a connection to autism?

A: Yes.

power outside the matrix

Q: And this is the same CDC that now wants us to believe that there is an Ebola epidemic?

A: Yes. As I was saying, I have a lovely condo for you on the dark side of the moon. Swimming pool, outdoor grill, playground for the kiddies, nine-hole golf course. Interested?

Q: No comment. But since we’ve come this far, perhaps you could explain why the tests for diagnosing Ebola are unreliable and useless.

A: Let’s start with the antibody test. Two problems. First, the test is notorious for what’s called “cross-reactions.” That means the test isn’t really registering, in this case, the presence of Ebola. It’s registering one of a whole host of other factors. For example, the patient received a vaccine, and that triggers a falsely positive reading.

Q: What’s the second problem?

A: The antibody test doesn’t say whether a person was sick, is sick, or will get sick. At best, if there are no cross-reactions, it merely says the person had contact with the virus in question. So a positive antibody test for Ebola is far from saying “this person has Ebola.” That’s a lie. In fact, before 1985, the general conclusion from positive antibody tests was: this is a good sign; the patient’s immune system contacted the germ and threw it off, defeated it.

Q: What about the PCR test for Ebola?

A: This test is prone to many mistakes, starting with the tiny, tiny sample of material taken from the patient. Is it really genetic material, and is that material really a piece of a virus, or is it just a piece of general and irrelevant debris? The test itself takes that tiny sample and amplifies it millions of times so it can be observed. Assuming it is actually Ebola virus, or a fragment of Ebola virus, there is no indication there is enough of the virus in the patient’s body to make him sick. There have to be millions upon millions of active virus in the patient’s body to begin to say that virus is causing problems. The PCR test says nothing about that. In fact, why was it necessary to do the PCR test at all? If the patient had enough Ebola virus in his body to cause illness, there was no need to search for a tiny fragment of a hoped-for Ebola virus, to start the PCR test. The virus would have been everywhere.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

This entry was posted in Ebola.

30 comments on “Ebolagate: 47 questions and answers

  1. johnmarkmcguire says:

    Simultaneous to the CDC’s actions during the big swine flu scare, the WHO issued the same instructions to all individual nations: to stop collecting statistical data of confirmed swine flu cases. Both domestically, in the US, and on a global scale, the actual number of confirmed swine flu cases came NOWHERE CLOSE to “pandemic” levels.

    … more NWO fearmongering, but also setting the stage for potential mass exterminations. The WHO, in concert with the CDC, has been carrying out a mass extermination agenda in Africa for at least 30 years now. Control the flow and dissemination of information and you can pull off such a heinous agenda with essentially zero repercussions, apparently.

    • Diane says:

      I agree. They have not even tested 83% of the African people that they claim died from ebola. This is a huge false flag and their vaccinations contain ebola. That from the CDC. But don’t take my word look them up on the UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE. We are starting to rock and roll now…Either stand for truth or fall for lies.

  2. Frank Lee says:

    Maybe send this page to AL…

  3. theodorewesson says:

    More on the individual’s immune system,…


    “Notice—[the CDC is saying absolutely nothing] about the most important fact in this equation: the strength of a person’s immune system and its superior ability to throw off a virus on its own.”



    “I’ve explained that when it comes to germs, the factor that determines health or illness in a human being is the strength of his immune system—not the germ itself.


    “Selling the ‘the germ and only the germ causes disease’ narrative is one of the great propaganda triumphs of modern medicine. Well, if you had a few billion dollars, an army of compliant media journalists, tens of thousands of doctors, and the federal government at your beck and call, you could sell the idea that tomatoes are the preferred fuel for space travel.

    “In these narratives, always go back to the beginning. Root out the most basic assumptions, and investigate them.

    “You’ll be surprised.”


  4. NWO Reporter says:

    Anderson Cooper interviews partner of man in Dallas hospital, who’s in quarantine with her kids. The woman, who seems to be speaking English as a 2nd language, says at around 3:45 that she thinks “people are telling lies”. A real journalist might have probed this statement a bit, but instead, Anderson quickly stuffs a script into her mouth about “what she means”.


    Media everywhere is jumping on the “CDC is not doing enough to protect people” bandwagon – spreading the panic and public demand for police state measures. The family is under armed guard and required to submit to blood tests. If someone wants an opportunity to expand the USA DNA database, it’s a perfect one, because people will be lining up in droves demanding to get their blood drawn “for testing”. Unbelievably, I heard some people in Austin this morning talking about halting all travel into the city from Dallas. Thankfully there are people like Jon trying to bring some sanity to this insane psy-op, which is scarier by far than Ebola.

    • Kevininthemancave says:

      Are you talking about the same Anderson Cooper who had his nose cropped off during a “live” interview with a Sandy Hook parent? The ‘green screen’ technicians really screwed up.

  5. james says:

    i totally agree with this article, from what I have researched on my own, Jon is 100% correct. I do not believe we have Ebola in the USA. However if people can be convinced we do they will react to this psychop with fear and will give up more of their liberties, which is the plan of course.
    Now I have to add, that if people begin to accept the “ebola vaccine” then we will have ebola in the USA. From what I have read ebola vaccines were given in Africa by those there to “study”
    the ebola virus, these labs “studying” ebola were run by western universities. I read that one country if not more has closed these labs and kicked these “researchers” out of their countries,
    when they figured out what was going on.

    • theodorewesson says:

      Excellent comments James. Just to add on to what you are saying,…

      Jon posted the following article on August 1st: “What are US biowar researchers doing in the Ebola zone?”



      re: “However if people can be convinced we do they will react to this psychop with fear and will give up more of their liberties, which is the plan of course.”

      Agreed. Not only that, “fear” lowers a person’s immune system — I’ve been hearing that from well respected alternative healers — Dr. Edward Group, ND (naturalpathic doctor) and Robert Sscott Bell (homeopathy practicioner).


      Also, re: “if people begin to accept the ‘ebola vaccine’ then we will have ebola in the USA.”

      Just to clarify,… in my understanding, a “suppressed immune system” individual taking an “ebola vaccine” could cause that individual to die or to become very ill or paralized (Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS)). And, a “very strong immune system” individual taking an “ebola vaccine” less so — I would think.

      The resulting death or becoming very ill or paralyzed — in a “suppressed immune system” individual — would only be the result of the “ebola” virus if a doctor could point to lab work results which shows that there was a LARGE quanty of said “virus” present in the body (high concentation (high titer)) — something, BTW, that the “PCR test” (which the CDC is currently saying is the test being used) inherently does NOT look for (that is to say, the “PCR test” does NOT determine the “concentration” by inherent design).

      Otherwise, other toxins present in the vaccine cocktail put the person over the edge.

      What is also crazy is that a shot (by it inherent design) physically bypasses the external-defense layers of the body — giving the toxic junk in the vaccine a leg up on its assualt on the body!


      And, in the grand scheme of things, chemical are much more toxic and controllable than germs/virus.




      In closing,…

      “When a researcher or an investigator suspects he is looking at an artificial narrative, a storyline that is floated to achieve a hidden agenda, he has to deal with one overriding question:

      “How deep does he want to go, in order to root out the potential lies and false material?

      “Into how basic a level of the narrative does he want to cut, to see what leaks out?”

      Ebola for alert minds: the art of the covert narrative

      —Jon Rappoport

      • Kevininthemancave says:

        Our immune systems are being systematically suppressed each and every day by overhead aerosol spraying and the ingestion of poison which goes by the name, food.

  6. Dr. Bruce Lipton explains the influence of stress on the human body and how to stay healthy! http://youtu.be/RBvIPxZmW_s

  7. Janice says:

    Dr. Eric R. Pianka gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March of 2006 advocating the mass death of 90% of the world’s population through the AIRBORNE EBOLA VIRUS. He received a standing ovation. Please advise if you are aware of this. Thank you.

  8. usurykills says:

    Kits are nearing approval. Probably needed a little nudge.
    Corgenix designs test kits for deadly diseases
    The Denver Business Journal
    by Bob Mook
    October 26, 2007

    A small Broomfield-based company — currently trading for less than 50 cents a share — hopes that test kits that can detect killer viruses such as Ebola and Lassa Fever will lift it out of the over-the-counter bulletin board and into the American Stock Exchange.

    For three years, Corgenix Medical Corp. has worked with researchers from Tulane University, the U.S. Army and two other biotech companies to develop diagnostic test kits that will help detect an outbreak of deadly diseases without the benefit of a sophisticated clinical laboratory.

    Developed under a $3.8 million grant from the National Institutes of Health, the kits should be available to health care workers and government officials next year.

    Doug Simpson, president and CEO of Corgenix, said the product, which is being tested in parts of Africa and by the U.S. military, potentially could prevent the spread of disease and help Homeland Security officials thwart bioterrorism attacks.

  9. Steve Stars says:

    Why do you have to RUIN our Ebola party with common sense Jon? Hey, you didn’t even mention HIV which was the BIG Extravaganza to the tune of over 400 Billion dollars, (probably closer to 1/2 TRILLION now) They still have that one going long after Swine flu, SARS and H1N1.!

    But I am kind of like you. I am sort of having an Ebola burnout thing happening. Maybe it is just me. I just don’t FEEL the terror for some reason! It must be my burnout on the long history of germ scares.
    I think this may be a HUGE distraction.
    I get the impression that the “Ebola scare” is designed to take the heat off Obama for the Syrian attacks on ISIS and the other 22,347 things he is in trouble with. Plus, the aftermath of Gaza and the failures with Ukraine. Only one month away from elections too, and Democrats don’t want a lot of Obamacare failure stories out there now.
    WOW! Maybe a sepcial clause in Obamcare will emerge to save the WHITE WORLD! That would really make us all feel better!
    But until then, I guess I might as well be honest as say the Ebola scare is a Fraud. Because there is very little I can do to stop it if it is real, and if I am right, (which would be good) then maybe people will see through this distraction and bring it to an end earlier.
    Time to get on to the real issues.

    • LadyRavenSDC says:

      Sorry Steve – the “people” didn’t see thru Hussein Obama’s “I don’t have a plan for ISIS” ploy. Then the beheadings began and the “people” were BEGGING him to take us to war. You see how that worked out.
      As Jon and others have pointed out – the plan is to get us to BEG gov/CDC/President Ebola to give us the unproven medicines/vaccinations.
      This video is a year old, H7N9 didn’t catch on – one would wonder if they won’t just switch diseases….
      [H7N9] ALL Americans Will Get Two Experimental Vaccinations, Says U.S. Government

  10. NORBERT says:

    Interesting how Infowars knew to invite Jon on right before all this happened so they could spin it with Jones’ sage “doubts” — and now Jones is “vindicated” and inforwars is hyping it.

  11. Hugh Mann says:

    As always in this drama filled world, problem, reaction solution. The parasitic corporations, government(s) and non-elite creating scenarios to get a wanted reaction from the masses in order to screw us evermore. Bend over and spread ’em folks, get ready for martial law.

  12. Jane says:

    Thinking back when I went to medical school, the dull boys whom were not so quick and just barely passes the tests and had difficult times relating to patients in residency, those were the ones that went to the CDC and other govt jobs. Getting I the govt jobs is all about power, the money comes later and under the table
    When they grease the way for the new med or vaccine.

    The doctors in the cdc are not the best and the brightest. They are the losers, I am very worried.

  13. Dick says:

    The boys pushing the Ebolagate pandemic , much like the Swine flu hoax, own the patent on the disease and the vaccines, Read Dave Hodges article:

    The CDC, NIH & Bill Gates Own the Patents On Existing Ebola & Related Vaccines: Mandatory Vaccinations Are Near by Dave Hodges | September 17, 2014

    Source URL: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/09/17/the-cdc-nih-bill-gates-own-the-patents-on-existing-ebola-related-vaccines-mandatory-vaccinations-are-near/

  14. Jerry says:

    This blog really woke me up to the way they operate. Whip the masses into a frenzy and the vaccine makers make billions!!

  15. Lilly says:

    Since no one has the answers all opinions to me, what I don’t understand is this. WHY would every person having to do w these cases go along w it? There are hundreds of people from airplanes, airports, cabs, hospitals, etc that would be affected, and if they are following blindly that makes no sense either. I for one would NOT I my job do anything against my conscience ever. I guess I am to old for this.

  16. Q: What about the PCR test for Ebola?

    Even Kary Mullis discounts using the PCR to detect viruses in the body. Mullis’s invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) won him the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1993.

    And, let’s not forget that the CDC made wild claims about how AIDS would propagate from the high-risk groups (Homosexuals, intravenous drug users, and hemophiliacs) to the general population and cause a widespread epidemic of the disease. Never happened.

  17. Tara says:

    it is just like this ED68 virus going around. the CDC and a “handful” of labs are the only ones able to test for it. yet, this virus is paralyzing kids like polio. which this virus is an enterovirus, just like polio. so we are to believe that some kids tested positive, some didn’t, yet this virus has been around since 1976 and there are no other labs able to test for this?? it does not make sense. if the CDC and a handful of “their” labs are the only ones able to test for this, i smell a rat. Thank you for all your work Jon.

    • theodorewesson says:

      If this were Las Vegas, and I were a betting man, and the bet up on the electronic board was “the ‘otherwise healthy’ kids paralyzed over the last couple months, was caused by,… (1) Enterovirus (ED68), or, (2) toxins in the vaccines. (choose one)”

      I would choose “(2)”.


      • Tara says:

        True. They do point out that they are “up to date” on their polio shot. Have to say that so not to scare people into thinking this is just polio. Is EV68 the new polio?

        • theodorewesson says:

          i would just say, “are we seeing the same old effects ‘of being pushed over the edge’ from intravenously ingesting ‘toxins in vaccines?'” (with pre-cusor being,… to set up the child’s lowered immune system — the ingestion of pesticide-laden & GMO-laden foods and toxins in the public drinking water)

          • Tara says:

            what i find the most convincing is that Ebola has been around since the 70’s. there have always been outbreaks in Africa. Yet, travel to and from has been happening nonstop since. there has not been one case of Ebola here that has been “publicized”. so i find it convincing that now all of a sudden we have an outbreak, the stocks in the vaccine are going through the roof, and we have all these photos, and people who do not even resemble what the old Ebola looked like popping out of the woodwork. if that isn’t enough to make people question, then i don’t think much will. All of his points are on target.

          • theodorewesson says:


            Q: There are other long-term reasons for death and dying in West Africa?

            A: Protein-calorie malnutrition, hunger, starvation, extreme poverty, contaminated water supplies, overall lack of basic sanitation, a decade of horrific war, toxic medical drugs, prior toxic vaccine campaigns, etc.

            Q: And the combined effect of these conditions?

            A: Destruction of immune systems. Then, any germ that sweeps through the population, a germ that would ordinarily be defeated, instead kills many people. Why? Because the immune system is too weak to respond. With healthy and strong immune systems, the germs would have no significant effect.

  18. kauni26 says:

    It’s so refreshing to get this Jon.. I respect your deep research and believe we
    are most definitely in a propaganda matrix..for many years now. The human mind
    is easily manipulated…which is so sad. We are basically naive children in many ways…
    and this is just human nature. The PTB figured this out…and voila..we are in a horrific
    fix. See also Arthur & Fiona Cristian’s site ‘LoveForLife, our of Queensland, Australia area… He has details on similar beliefs…but his rant is angry at this point. He has been working at alerting
    people for so long…and still we cling to heavily indoctrinated beliefs that authority is all knowing, that they ‘care’ about us, that scientists and doctors are gods, etc….just insane stuff… Humans are very hard to wake up..but we will never give up on creating a better world for all….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *