The biochemical dream of utopia

The biochemical dream of utopia

by Jon Rappoport

September 4, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

HG Well’s 1933 classic novel, The Shape of Things to Come, portrays a world exhausted by war and economic collapse—and the great turning to a Global State as the only possible solution, after all other solutions have historically failed. The new ruling authority is based on Science. All religions are crushed. Education is designed to teach every child how to become a genius/global citizen.

Science/technology: the final all-encompassing answer.

A significant aspect of Matrix propaganda revolves around myths about how human life can be transformed. Transformed through advances in biology and chemistry.

Populations are being trained to expect these momentous changes.

A major selling point: no effort is required. Just ingest this tablet. Accept this new gene. All will be done for you by experts.

The technocratic wing of Globalism has clout. It promises management of the planet through science, and who can argue with science? Central Planning will ensure proper benefits for all.

My late friend and colleague, hypnotherapist Jack True, once told me in an interview: “On a subconscious dream level—the idea is to insert a vision in the population about scientific improvements. We’re being taught to accept what amounts to a new religion. It’s a fetish. We’re buying an elaborate fetish about the future.”

What would you, for example, think if you saw the same person every day getting off a train, and every day he was wearing a different color paint on his face? And what if he was wearing a hundred large trinkets around his waist? And he was fingering these trinkets in deep contemplation? And what if he carried a large book with him and stopped strangers and read passages to them? What if he bowed deeply every time he saw a bus and fell to his knees when a woman in a hat passed him on the street?

A strange ritual.

In the same way, a space alien who knew nothing about medical practice would eventually notice the drugs, drugs, drugs people are taking and wonder what they were for. He would wonder whether swallowing them was part of an ongoing religious ceremony. He would see how dedicated people are to their medicines.

“I take this drug at six every morning. Then after breakfast, I take these two pills. Before lunch, I take three other pills. The green and the red and the white.”

“I love the small white capsules. They look so pristine, so pure, so elegant. Because they’re small, they must be very powerful.”

The doctor, the priest, prescribes them. He dispenses them. When he writes the prescription at his desk, the patient feels, for a moment, an elevated sense of importance.

The patient has attained a special privilege. He is no longer common. A thread has been created that connects him to a higher reality. The “science” that lies behind every pill is sophisticated. Who can grasp it? Just bask in the sensation and accept the secret knowledge.

When it comes to psychiatric drugs, the public is being instructed to believe that the pills, which flow from arbitrary diagnoses of unproven mental disorders, can make them whole again. The age-old dream achieved.

Vaccines? Through that ritual, the invisible demon viruses are kept at bay.


And now we are on the cusp of another medical fetish:

Genes.

Amateurs and professionals alike speculate and intone on their importance—despite the fact that no across-the-board successful gene treatment for any condition has ever been developed.

Academics and so-called bio-ethicists are arguing about how the future should utilize genetics. Should we have a society in which a privileged class can buy designer genes for their children and make them smarter, more talented, more powerful, while the lower class, which lives apart in separate dingy enclaves, stews in its own primitive juices?

Or should our leaders open the door to better genes for all?

The unproven concocted dream: everything is regulated by DNA; all aspects of human behavior are determined by this coding; free will is a cruel superstition; society could evolve into a utopia with the correct distribution of genetic traits; disease would be a thing of the past.


The selling of these medical-drug and gene stories is really, underneath it all, a way of convincing the world that science is our best option for the future. Understand that.

And of course, science must be controlled, like blessings from Rome, by those few who understand it and have the intelligence and compassion to plan the How and the Where of that dispensation.

With something as precious as science, we need the best and the brightest to determine the method by which we can all benefit.

After all, the car and the plane and the light bulb and the refrigerator were magnificent technological advances. Therefore, all medical drugs and genes are, too.

The drugs? A hundred thousand Americans killed every year by government-certified medicines. (JAMA, July 26, 2000, Starfield)

But the technocrats can’t admit spectacular failure. It would be like the Vatican confessing that all Eucharist wafers doled out to believers over the past 100 years were made by a company owned by Beelzebub.

The spinning of the dream about transmuting the human, through official chemistry and biology, must continue. It must not be stopped. It must engender expectation. It must gather adherents. It must continue to entrance us.

And naturally, unofficial science must be curtailed, because it suggests decentralization of power—and the WHOLE POINT of spinning the scientific legends is that they imply control of the future and the planet from a single high perch.

False science is Globalism’s most important product.

You see, selling the so-called kindness of elite planetary control is not enough. The idea that a small group of men can avoid all wars by securing the reins of the Earth is not enough. The notion that our natural resources must be distributed from a central point, for the sake of sustainability, is not enough. These propaganda points don’t convince enough people.

But the legend that Official Science is the wonder key to a better life has legs. It has power. It has subconscious influence of a high order. It can eventually convince the global populace that a Technocratic Council should rule over them.

Therefore, that legend about Science must be shored up and extended and protected. It must tell whatever lies are necessary to push the agenda forward.

“Genes are the Holy Grail.” The truth? It’s beside the point. Sell the myth. Pretend the evidence is there.

And brain drugs? Spread the message: they will cure our ills. They will untie the stubborn knots of discontent.

The defense-mechanism of the technocratic elite is: if you oppose our rational approach, you’re a cave man, a throwback, a Luddite, a superstitious fool grinding on with your phobias.

Meanwhile, it is this very elite that is peddling myth and fairy tale and illusion and dream, and capitalizing on fetish.


power outside the matrix


We’ve all learned that divide and conquer is the controllers’ strategy; that funding wars on both sides is their method; that bankrupting nations is their technique; that owning the means of inventing money is their sinister operation; that dominating channels of information is their major form of mind control; that brainwashed education is their cherished institution; that building the corporate-government embrace is their song. But these all bow before the altar of Scientific Myth, wherein we are persuaded to give up our own visions and our creative power to a Future that can only be run by Those Who Understand Technology.

Retired propaganda master Ellis Medavoy once told me, “Elites tell stories. They dress up those stories in expensive clothes. They’ll call ANYTHING science. Once science as an overall dream-solution is embedded in the subconscious, what else would you expect them to do? They’ll say this is science and that is science, because they’ve already sold the basic concept.”

I asked him whether the sales pitch not only covered “the good side of things” and the promised future utopia, but also the dark side.

“Are you kidding?” he said. “Every religion sells both sides. For example, once the general concept of “the feared virus” is imprinted in the subconscious, the technologists and bureaucrats of medicine come along and say, ‘Look at this virus. Look at that virus. We just found a new virus. Another virus has jumped species into humans. It’s horrible. Now, citizens, here are your marching orders. This is what you must do…’”

Ancient story, dressed up in new clothes.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

7 comments on “The biochemical dream of utopia

  1. jonfan says:

    Bravo!

    Another gem/masterpiece from the master. Impressive.

    Readers should also be aware of Bertrand Russell:
    “Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .”—-Bertrand Russell,1953

    “Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished … The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.” —–Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810

  2. Mark says:

    “We’ve arranged a global civilization in which the most crucial elements… profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power will blow up in our faces.” – Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

  3. Chris says:

    Science does not believe in consciousness (it can’t explain it) nor the soul (Wundt, 1880s). It does believe in intelligence, but says since it only occurs in humans, intelligence is a fluke, a mutation local to our species only. We’re in a heap of trouble.

  4. Philosonator says:

    Whoo-eee! Day-yee-eee-yaa-emm! Great article! Purty much covers it all– the State Church of Scientific Materialism!

  5. Lee says:

    “Maps are not images of the world but representations of apparent naturalness; they are arbitrary mechanisms of control. In Brian Harley’s (1992)* terms:

    …all maps, like all other historically constructed images, do not provide a transparent window on the world. Rather they are signs that present “a deceptive appearance of naturalness and transparence concealing an opaque, distorting, arbitrary mechanism of representation, a process of ideological mystification (Mitchell 1986, 8).

    Maps are central to a reading of a landscape that needs to be made knowable. Historically this has linked map-making with military conquest. Maps have also played a central role in violent conflict over land and resources, a relationship still evident in the mapping organizations of both Britain and Ireland. I think of maps as part of a larger circulation and production of specific forms of knowledge; a form of stadial thinking which creates a unified territory and which bounds politics to place making. Stadial thinking is where the entire world can be classified into groups, as if all that we see is all that there is.”
    http://trustandcontract.wordpress.com/2014/09/04/the-land-of-israel/

    To take this concept further one only has to muse on time and spatial MAPS OF CONSCIOUSNESS!!!

  6. Great article Jon….one of the best ever.

  7. ozziethinker says:

    When you look at the details of the unexplained anomalies, reality is very strange indeed (when offset against the “scientific” tradition). Your article “scratches the surface”.

    OT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *