by Jon Rappoport
March 11, 2014
(To join our email list, click here.)
Surveillance is coming at us from all angles. Chips, drones, TSA checkpoints, smart meters, back-doored electronic products, video cameras, spying home appliances; our phone calls and emails and keystrokes and product purchases are recorded.
The government and its allied corporations will know whatever they want to know about us.
What then?
What happens when all nations are blanketed from stem to stern with surveillance?
Public utilities, acting on government orders, will be able to allot electricity in amounts and at times it wishes to. This is leading to an overarching plan for energy distribution to the entire population.
Claiming shortages and limited options, governments will essentially be redistributing wealth, in the form of energy, under a collectivist model.
National health insurance plans (such as Obamacare) offer another clue. Such plans have no logistical chance of operating unless every citizen is assigned a medical ID package, which is a de facto identity card. In the medical arena, this means cradle-to-grave tracking.
Surveillance inevitably leads to: placing every individual under systems of control. It isn’t just “we’re watching you” or “we’re stamping out dissent.” It’s “we’re directing your participation in life.”
As a security analyst in the private sector once told me, “When you can see what every employee is doing, when you have it all at your fingertips, you naturally move on to thinking about how you can control those patterns and flows of movement and activity. It’s irresistible. You look at your employees as pieces on a board. The only question is, what game do you want to play with them?”
Every such apparatus is ruled, from the top, by Central Planners. When it’s an entire nation, upper-echelon technocrats revel in the idea of blueprinting, mapping, charting, and regulating the flows of all goods and services and people, “for the common good.”
Water, food, medicine, land use, transportation—they all become items of a networked system that chooses who gets what and when, and who can travel where, and under what conditions.
This is the wet dream of technocrats. They believe they are saving the world, while playing a fascinating game of multidimensional chess.
As new technologies are discovered and come on line, the planners decide how they will be utilized and for whose benefit.
In order to implement such a far-reaching objective, with minimal resistance from the global population, manufactured crises are unleashed which persuade the masses that the planet is under threat and needs “the wise ones” to rescue it and us.
We watch (and fight in) wars and more wars, each one exacerbated and even invented. We are presented with phony epidemics that are falsely promoted as scourges.
The only response, we are led to believe, is more humane control over the population.
On top of that, we are fed an unending stream of propaganda aimed at convincing us that “the great good for the greatest number” is the only humane and acceptable principle of existence. All prior systems of belief are outmoded. We know better now. We must be good and kind and generous to everyone at all times.
Under this quasi-religious banner, which has great emotional appeal, appears The Plan. Our leaders allocate and withhold on the basis of their greater knowledge. We comply. We willingly comply, because we are enlisted in a universal army of altruistic concern.
This is a classic bait and switch. We are taught to believe that service for the greater good is an unchallengeable goal and credo. And then, later, we find out it has been hijacked to institute more power over us, in every way.
The coordinated and networked surveillance of Earth and its people is fed into algorithms that spit out solutions. This much food will go here; that much water will go there; here there will be medical care; there medical care will be severely rationed. These people will be permitted to travel. Those people will be confined to their cities and towns.
Every essential of life—managed with on-off switches, and the consequences will play out.
An incredibly complex system of interlocking decisions will be hailed as messianic.
Surveillance; planning; control.
This is the vision.
It isn’t ours. It never was. But we are not consulted.
Instead we are made witness to watershed events: the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing; the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center; the 2001 assault on the Trade Center and the Pentagon. These ops paralleled the unleashing of better and more far-ranging methods of surveillance.
We are profiled down to the threads on our clothing and DNA in our cells. But what is our profile of the technocrats and their bosses?
They are divorced from human life. They live in a vacuum. They take pleasure from that vacuum.
In 1982, I interviewed Bill Perry, who had just left his job as PR chief at Lawrence Livermore Labs, where scientists design nuclear weapons. Perry had been given the kind of job PR people long for. But one day, when he passed the desk of a researcher and listened to his complaints about budget limitations, Perry said, “Listen, America already has the means to blow up the whole planet eight times. What more do you need?”
The researcher looked up at him with a genuinely puzzled expression. He said, “You don’t understand, Bill. This is a problem in physics.”
In the same detached sense, the technocrats who want to calculate and direct our future, move by move, minute by minute, see us as components of a complex and very interesting problem.
Yes, they indeed expect to exercise power and control. But they also live in an abstraction. They deal their answers from that realm. They exercise cool passion. They see, for example, that not every single twitch of thought of every person on earth is yet mapped, so they want to finish constructing the means by which they can chart those “missing elements.” They want to complete the formula.
They view their research as a wholly natural implication of the mathematics they can manipulate. They swim in technology and they want to extend its architecture. To abandon the program would be tantamount to denying their own intelligence. They climb the mountain because it is there.
They do perceive that one factor does not fit their algorithms: the free individual. It’s the wild card. Therefore, they are compelled to analyze freedom and break it down into DNA functions and brain processes. They assume, because they must, that the free individual is an illusory idea that flows from some older configuration of synaptic transmission, at a time in our evolution when we needed it. But now, they suppose, the engineering of human activity and thought has superseded such quaint notions. Now we all can be tracked, traced, and studied on a different and wider scale. Now we can be seen for what we really are: a hive.
Therefore, we must be instructed, within tight limits, about our various functions.
Today’s technocrats flourish with great optimism as they design the future world and its single society. If they run out of pieces of their puzzle to study, they’ll try to track the motion of every atom and electron and quark in the universe. They’ll delight in it.
Knowing all this, we know the terms of the war we are in.
The Central Planners have an equation: “free=uncontrolled=dangerous.”
By the gross terms of that equation, they lump us in with thugs and murderers and terrorists. They even see the normal functioning of the brain as a threat, as an intrinsically defective process, and they have long since decided that organ must be corrected with drugs.
We, on the other hand, must assert, in every way possible, that freedom is real and inviolable, and we must back that up with our actions.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
People forget or never were aware that the old Soviet Union (USSR) told people what their professions would be. If they wanted a child to become a dancer or ice skater he or she did what they were assigned to do. This applied to less glamorous jobs, so those with a creative bent could not pursue their passions if Mother Russia said NO. Is this the world Obama and his ilk envision for the rest of us? They, of course, are pursuing their passions, which seems to be to bilk the country while bring it under their control.
Barbara it was London and Wall street who ‘gave’ the russians bolshevism. The western elites wanted Russia to be a dictatorship, instead of a competitive economy, which it was on the way to before the foreign-backed revolution was thrust upon them.
Thank you Peter. Yes, I was aware, but Russia didn’t say no. We could learn from their mistake. I pointed out what I did so that those who think there are not grave consequences to the loss of liberty, should think twice.
Barbara, dont mean to pick on you, I promis. I’m just worried about ignorance among americans. The ignorance might result in WWWIII.
The russians never had a chance to say no. It was all forced on them. Earlier the russians had saved the US from being split among the europeans by sending a fleet. (England was on both sides of the civil war and the South would never have been free no matter what.)
During the whole bolshevikperiod the Sovjets were never independent from London and Wall street. The foreign bankers had their conduits among the Sovjet power structure and they were safe from the purges. You’ve perhaps heard that Anthony Sutton called the Sovjet union a technological colony. Stalin who is the most demonized is described thus because he tried to free them from this dependence. He wanted to build a goldbacked economic union together with several other nations, where pound and dollar fiat money would have a much weaker status.
Churchill received the order of garters after Stalin was finished.
What most people do not realize , the same ” Tribe ” behind the Russian Bolshevik Revolution is now occupying the U. S. The Second Bolshevik Revolution exactly 100 years later , but with America as it’s target !
Barbara, I grew up in the Soviet bloc between the 1960s and 1980s. There was no interference by the communists with one’s career plans. My parents, now in their 80s, had the freedom to choose their paths, too.
Last weekend I read the book “The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology” by Lily E. Kay. One thing that struck me while reading that book is that the psychopath insane ‘elites’ have been carrying forth their plan to control humanity for a very long time. They have pushed an agenda of eugenics, ‘human engineering’, and social control for more than a century. The private foundations were funding these efforts in the early 1900s and programs were going full speed ahead as early as the 1920s-30s in universities and other institutions. The targeted critical areas included education, media, public health, medicine, agriculture, and scientific research, to name a few.. All of this was undertaken with the question asked “How do we use this to control human beings?” The surveillance/spying grid is another pillar of this matrix of control. Its objective is not only to spy on everyone and thus attack dissent. – It’s also used to predict and manipulate human behavior. The various ‘color revolutions’ around the world are a perfect example of how this is used. Everything they push is a lie. Everything they push is another tool for building their Nazi-like human control/exploitation matrix. Unfortunately, America has been used to push this agenda forward for the last century.
[…] More:jonrappoport.wordpress.com Detailed […]
[…] Jon Rappoport’s Blog (No Ratings Yet) […]
[…] No More Fake News […]
No doubt the ‘global managers’ have the kind of world you’re describing in mind, and in the works. As I was reading your article, it reminded me of a movie I saw awhile back, Code 46, which has as it’s backdrop the completely controlled global society that you describe, as well as Jacques Attali’s book ‘Millennium’ which describes the same and emphatically pushes the idea that personal sovereignty is a thing of the past and must be wiped out – oh, of course, except for the ruling class who need to maintain their full human capacities in order to direct everything. Anyway, there are so many books from the ‘elite’ ranks over the last 100 years or so describing this, that there’s no doubt that’s where they’re steering the ship. You’re doing a service by keeping this in front of everyone in it’s current embodiment. Depressing though.
“… — oh, of course, except for the ruling class who need to maintain their full human capacities in order to direct everything.”
* i have a sneaky suspicion that the uber elite families eat only “non-gmo, non-pesticide based foods” (and not just for the taste), rely primarilty on herbalists to help them detox thier bodies (and only see an allopath, for, say broken bones and other trumatic injuries), and do not vaccinate their children. As you say, “to maintain their full human capacities”.
* in a tangential way, you’ve reminded me of,… a little over a year after the 911 massacre, i learned that private airports do not have TSA screenings.
Yup!
“Upper-echelon technocrats do perceive that one factor does not fit their algorithms: the free individual. It’s the wild card.” — Jon Rappoport
[…] / http://www.jonrappoport.wordpress.com / link to original article […]
[…] Jon Rappoport […]
[…] Jon Rappoport’s Blog […]
[…] JonRappoport March 11 2014 […]
Another thought on your insightful blog. For millennia humans have been fighting for freedom from those greedy egos who would oppress others to use them to gain massive wealth as well control over the populace, e.g., kings and clergy. The Scots/Irish and American settlers against English, Blacks from Apartheid as well other ethnicities against slavery over millennia, women from men, and on and on. What evil has taken hold that would oppress human beings after all these thousands of years of struggle? Is it possible that a few small egos can wreck havoc over the world simply because their parents disciplined them, so they want to take it out on the rest of humanity–and profit from it too? Is something else going on? It is difficult to believe that some “alien force” as history and discovery channels surmise would, after all these years, body-snatch leaders to do their bidding because they want this planet. What makes these small little egos tick? Knowing that might help in fighting them.
[…] Final goal of the Surveillance State […]
Chaos theory – a basic law of the universe – says they will never acheive their goal. The harder they squeeze the more it will slip through their fingers. Even as they work to control the Internet, the Darknet grows.
[…] No More Fake News […]
Reblogged this on ActivistPoster.
[…] by Jon Rappoport […]
[…] http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/final-goal-of-the-surveillance-state/ […]
We can only hope that mass surveillance has such innocuous or even beneficent motivations as the implementation of collectivism. I am more afraid it will allow a few […] bankers in New York to maintain unassailable dominion over the rest of humanity.