Keep this in mind when they try to sell you a pandemic
by Jon Rappoport
February 7, 2014
Researchers are making noises about a possible new pandemic. One or more variations of bird flu. And of course, in all these ramp-ups, the bottom line is: get vaccinated.
The so-called pandemics train you to obey, so you’ll take all the shots they recommend for every disease, like a good little muffin.
“Seasonal flu? Pandemic flu? Meningitis? Hepatitis? Whooping cough? Measles? Polio? Martian Traveler’s Disease? Venusian Restless Leg? Gimme everything you’ve got. Inject me! Protect me!”
Here are few items to consider when the pandemic professionals start grinding out media warnings.
How many confirmed cases of the disease in question are there, at that moment? Ten? Fifty? A thousand? Out of a population of eight billion?
For example, as Peter Doshi pointed out in BMJ online, when the big push on Swine Flu started, in the spring of 2009, there were only 20 purported cases of Swine Flu. Twenty. (BMJ Online, v.339, b3471)
This is a pandemic?
The mere claim that “a novel virus,” never before seen, has emerged in humans is NOT a slam-dunk for a pandemic. Not by a long shot.
Swine flu was supposed to be one of those, and it was a dud. The number of deaths reported was far lower than the numbers traditionally reported for seasonal flus.
Number 2, how are doctors or researchers testing patients to confirm they have “pandemic flu?” This is a big issue. If, for example it’s antibody testing, they’re conning you straight out. Why? Because the presence of antibodies (a scouting component of the immune system) is not a sure sign that the person has been ill, is ill now, or will become ill.
Antibodies only indicate a person has contacted the virus in question. That’s it. And until the mid-1980s, when the science was turned upside down for no good reason, a positive antibody test was normally taken to mean the person’s immune system was healthy and had kicked out the virus.
If doctors and researchers are testing people for some purported pandemic virus using the PCR method, there are other problems. The PCR is a procedure that takes tiny, tiny fragments of organic matter from a patient and amplifies them, blows them up, so they can be recognized and read.
However, there is no sure-fire guarantee these fragments are really pieces of viruses. And if the original extraction of such organic material yielded so little from the patient, how on earth would one assume it was causing illness?
Which brings us to the next point. In determining whether a patient has some pandemic illness, and especially early in the game when researchers are still trying to figure out what’s going on, they need to actually isolate that virus from the patient and show it is present in huge numbers in his body. Otherwise, there is no reason to infer the virus is causing disease.
The purported cases of flu in patients could be coming from a number of different factors. A person might be ill as a result of: toxic chemicals, environmental or pharmaceutical; nutritional deficits; stress; parasites, etc.
The biggest issue is: the strength or weakness of that person’s immune system.
In devastated areas, where poverty, contaminated water supplies, starvation, lack of basic sanitation, and overcrowding are chronic, many germs can sweep through the population and cause death, because these people’s immune systems are shot, compromised, on the way out, and can’t defend against the germs.
The same germs, in an affluent area, would cause little harm.
The bottom-line is, to know what is making a person ill, you have to examine that person for many different factors. You can’t just say, “Well, we found a virus in him and therefore that’s why he is sick.”
That’s not science, that’s hype. That’s not research, that’s PR.
As the hype expands and health agencies like the CDC and WHO announce there are thousands of cases of pandemic flu and deaths, they don’t tell you how they’re counting.
That’s a gross omission. For instance, in the summer of 2009, the CDC stopped testing patients who walked into clinics and hospitals with generalized “flu symptoms.” The CDC just assumed they were all suffering from Swine Flu. CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson reported this fact and it caused a firestorm, until the story was cut off at the knees by the CBS news division.
You want to know what really happens when so-called flu patients are tested?
Here’s a quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”
Boom.
Doshi then states: “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”
In other words, even if you believe in vaccines, even if you think they’re wonderful and the world would collapse without them, when it comes to the flu, things are not what they seem. 84% of supposed or suspected or diagnosed flu patients are falsely labeled. Even by loose conventional standards, they don’t have the flu. It’s a mirage.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
It may be a mirage but when you are potentially setting out on a desert journey you want to carry a lot of water with you and that is exactly what getting a flu shot does, it protects your “water” supply.
No it doesn’t. Did you not read the article? What delusion are you living under? If some guy in a lab coat told you that eating rat poison is good for you would you do it?
What? I can’t even count the number of logical fallacies in that statement!
Now that’s a twist, fill up your body bottle with toxic drugs, and call it a fix.
If your doctor insists that vaccines are safe then have them sign this form. http://www.naturalcuresnotmedicine.com/2014/02/doctor-insists-vaccines-safe-sign-form.html
[…] Jon Rappoport’s Blog […]
Reblogged this on N.S. Alternate News.
I agree with you totally Jon, what people fail to realize is, they already have a vaccine manufacturing plant inside their own bodies. Unique to every individual. It’s been working every day, and you don’t even realize it is happening.
It has come to me over years of thinking about this subject, that flus can/are a beneficial thing to the whole body. They are not very good when one experiencing a flu, we become headachy, the runs, vomiting and fever, but they do benefit the body. The old adage ‘what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger’ can and should be applied here. A healthy immune system should be able to deal with any invader. If there is anything to the evolutionary process of man, then we are the accumulative knowledge of many viruses and bacteria over the millions of years we have existed here on earth.
“Everything wants to ride in your transformer.”
What do I mean by that?
We are continually changing adapting replacing one body organism for another…or improving it.
Pesticides, GMO’s and enviro-toxins ruin gut flora, one can introduce beneficial other via adding fermented foods to our diet or simply purchasing an acidophilus from the local health food store. Or we simply adapt to an invader, and in some cases the invader adapts to us. A symbiotic relationship is the achievement.
The cartilage in your joints are produced by an organism that is not per se human, but at one time it was an invader which has been assimilated to become part of a colony of organisms that make up what is called a human being. There is a purpose now. There are bacteria in your eyes that clean them, lubricate and protect against invading infections, and in one instance speed recovery from injury.
You even have multi-celled life forms that live on your body. Mites that live in your ears, living on the earwax and protecting the ears from invaders, they live in your eyelashes…inside of them are viruses and bacterium native only to their genus. They do us no harm though.
Blood hemoglobin is a bacterium which serves a vital purpose. It is part of that colony of bacteria we call a human. This is why a blood transfusion works within parameters of blood type, but organs may be rejected completely, we dealing with different organisms here. And internal organs rely or a whole body defense systems to protect it. Blood is tougher stuff, being exposed to the outside environment, through its purpose of supplying oxygen to muscle and brain. And in it being a first line of defense in the protection of the whole body.
Symbiosis is a process whereby two or more things come together to make an even stronger and greater whole, and in the end a synergistic effect is the result.
Most of what your body has learned, was taught by viruses and bacteria.
For all we know, we are the invention of a colony of organisms. Which came together as allies.
My point is, the body mind in its ultimate wisdom may see an invading flu, as not a great threat, a sickness yes, but something controllable not fatal to the whole body politic, and as an important virus which could be used as a way to rid the body of other annoying parasites. It can also be a virus it needs to add to the vast library of information it carries within its genetics. Anti-bodies are the production of a new life form from information in a virus.
Your body is a very smart; as long as you keep it healthy and not confused, healthy immune systems can easily deal with any invader. But it immune system cannot be stressed all the time; which seems to be the case for and a reason for vaccines and this alludes to a game plan of the so called masters of the universe.
Michael
“Back in 1983, the United States government approved the release of the first genetically modified organism. In this case, it was a bacteria that prevents frost on food crops.”- Jeremy Rifkin
During the height of “Bird Flu” propaganda an Illiterate (literally, not figuratively) neighbor of mine ran across the street as I was filling my bird feeder to berate me for exposing the neighborhood to the dreaded “Bird Flu.”
“Good,” I replied, “There’s too many effin people!”
Shut him up for a spell.
The Boot-Strap Expat
http://thebootstrapexpat.com/
Bwahahahahhaaaaa!
You nailed Jon, ha what’s new though.
Hello my fellows, the immune system, when weak, run down, compromised, etc., Is susceptible to any further weakening condition whatsoever. Not robot science, but we are led on a merry chase in the other direction looking for treatments instead of preventions. And low and behold most of these so-called cures are highly profitable toxic drugs, that in most cases further weaken the system.
So how do our immune systems end up in such weakened states? Maybe this subject should be front and center in the first place. Instead the main dialogue is about health care, instead of maintaining health.
Obviously the main concern in the corporate board rooms of the world, is how to increase profits and the well being of the world be damned. A diseased medicated populace is big business.
Would anyone like to elaborate on the ways the citizens well being is being compromised nowadays.
Well done, Jon. These “pandemics” will never come to pass unless there is wide spread war that cuts off food supplies, and maybe not even then. It’s all a hoax. I’m not the slightest worried about the boogie man flu, bc all i have to do is keep my vitamin c and d levels up, get good sleep and bob’s your uncle.
Actually the most astounding thing in all this is that a nation of 312 million “educated” denizens accept that fed organizations such as the AMA use KNOWN carcinogens to “cure”, (being of course a relative term), cancers, CRUSH any research/researchers who come up with any (obvious) alternatives and they are not only allowed to continue in this insanity, these same 312 million DEIFY it while vilifying other nations for being “lesser”. If they weren’t propagating ignorance and death one could call it hilarious.
Note: My comments follow below.
This just in,…
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/opinion-mandating-flu-shots-moral-choice-n24521
Opinion: Mandating Flu Shots Is the Moral Choice
By Arthur Caplan
The battle over vaccination has taken a fascinating new twist in Rhode Island, where the Department of Health has proposed a policy under which all children between 6 months and 5 years of age would have to be vaccinated against the flu before entering daycare or preschool.
The twist: Along with the usual vaccination opponents, the ACLU has joined the fight — on the critics’ side. That is the side that favors letting people get sick, miss work and even die in the name of personal choice.
[snip]
Why do I say the ACLU is off the mark both morally and medically?
Medically, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention both strongly recommend routine flu vaccine for everyone older than 6 months and especially for children younger than 5. The 47 percent Davis quoted? That’s based on the entire general population, not the children affected by the mandate. For children 6 months to 17 years, the CDC said the effectiveness rate was 64 percent. And, the more kids who get vaccinated, the greater the efficacy of the vaccine due to “herd immunity” — fewer unvaccinated kids makes it harder for the flu virus to spread in a daycare center or classroom.
[snip]
…the proposed policy lets parents opt out of vaccination for medical or religious reasons as long as they keep their kids at home during flu outbreaks. Surely, protecting the health of others by requiring them to be vaccinated or stay home can be justified by trying to prevent the 37 deaths of children who have already died from the flu this season. Their liberty is permanently over.
The government telling parents what to do when it comes to their children’s health is hardly new. They do it a lot — from mandating carseats to banning lead paint and requiring childproof caps on drugs and pesticides. For parents who balk when it comes to science and safety, the state has a legitimate interest in overriding bad choices that can be fatal.
Connecticut, New Jersey and New York City all have the kind of preschool flu shot mandates Rhode Island is trying to implement. The ACLU, parents, teachers unions and all the rest of us should be doing something about this. All should be making sure Rhode Island and the rest of the nation adopt mandatory flu vaccination policies.
Bio:
Arthur L. Caplan, Ph.D., is an NBC News contributor. He is currently the Drs. William F. and Virginia Connolly Mitty Professor and founding head of the Division of Bioethics at New York University Langone Medical Center. He is the author or editor of 32 books, most recently “Contemporary Debates in Bioethics” and “Ethics in Mental Healthcare: A Reader.”
~~~~~
COMMENTS:
Seems what allopathic Arthur is saying is,..
* Based on the AMA, AAP, and CDC allopathic doctors believing and promoting and “marketing” the “herd immunity virus theory” as the “gold standard” of modern medical science acheivement (and given that state legislatures across the land have been “running with these various pronouncements of the allopaths” since the 1910 Flexner report (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report)), then, not only should one’s allopathic doctor “market” flu shots to you and your children, and, not only should the chain pharmacies “market” flu shots to you and your children,… the local grubmint should also “market” flu shots to you and your children, too. They’re just “tightening up loose ends”, or, from a purely advertising perspective, they’re just “extending reach”.
* All children between 6 months and 5 years of age would have to be vaccinated against the flu before _starting_ daycare or preschool, so as to be able to submit the “OPT-IN” paper work on the start day. Where said “OPT-IN” paper work would then be entered into the child’s computer records. Or, on the start day submit the OPT-OUT paper work [1]. Where said “OPT-OUT” paper work would then be entered into the child’s computer records.
[1] It could be a little tricky getting an allopathic doctor, in some jurisdictions, to give you OPT-OUT paper work. Is getting OPT-OUT paperwork from a naturalpathic doctor allowed? Does “religious” legally include “moral” and/or “(personal?) philosophical” exemption? In this day and age, do you need a personal lawyer? In this day and age, are there also “regulations” on what will be accepted as valid OPT-OUT paperwork?
* For those students with the OPT-IN paper work in their computer-based records,… then when/should a ‘flu outbreak’ occur and be duly decreed, then, those OPT-IN children will then NOT be ordered to stay home — for the duration of said decree.
* The OPT-OUT children will be ordered to stay home — for the duration of said decree. Joyce, the admin assistant, will do a dip of the database — via her web broswer — to pull up the list of OPT-OUT children — so as to then merge those names and addresses into the “you are ordered to not come to class (for such and such dates)” form letter — and then press print! And, she’ll also send out the notices via (unencyrypted) email! And, she’ll set up the “robo dial” to all the OPT-OUT childrens’ parents cellphones with the recorded message!
* Could it also possibly be that there is an additional factor as to why certain state grubmints across the land are “extending their marketing”? Could the “percentage of OPT-INs” be tied to the amount of federal dollars received?
* Home schooling anyone? Midwifery at birth anyone?
Since the “Influenza vaccine” is “on the schedule” for children as young as 6-months, this is the “gap” the grubmint officials are harping about.
Vaccine schedule 2014:
This schedule includes recommendations in effect as of January 1, 2014. Any dose not administered at the recommended age should be administered at a subsequent visit, when indicated and feasible. The use of a combinationvaccine generally is preferred over separate injections of its equivalent component vaccines. Vaccination providers should consult the relevant Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) statement for detailed recommendations, available online at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. Clinically significant adverse events that follow vaccination should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) online (http://www.vaers.hhs.gov) or by telephone (800-822-7967). Suspected cases of vaccine-preventable diseases should be reported to the state or local health department. Additional information, including precautions and contraindications for vaccination, is available from CDC online (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/vac-admin/contraindications.htm) or by telephone (800-CDC-INFO [800-232-4636]). This schedule is approved by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (http//www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip), the American Academy of Pediatrics (http://www.aap.org), the American Academy of Family Physicians (http://www.aafp.org), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (http://www.acog.org).
[snip]
Influenza vaccines. (Minimum age: 6 months for inactivated influenza vaccine [IIV], 2 years for live, attenuated influenza vaccine [LAIV])
Routine vaccination:
• Administer influenza vaccine annually to all children beginning at age 6 months. For most healthy, nonpregnant persons aged 2 through 49 years, either LAIV or IIV may be used. However, LAIV should NOT be administered to some persons, including 1) those with asthma, 2) children 2 through 4 years who had wheezing in the past 12 months, or 3) those who have any other underlying medical conditions that predispose them to influenza complications. For all other contraindications to use of LAIV, see MMWR 2013; 62 (No. RR-7):1-43, available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6207.pdf.
For children aged 6 months through 8 years:
• For the 2013–14 season, administer 2 doses (separated by at least 4 weeks) to children who are receiving influenza vaccine for the first time. Some children in this age group who have been vaccinated previously will also need 2 doses. For additional guidance, follow dosing guidelines in the 2013-14 ACIP influenza vaccine recommendations, MMWR 2013; 62 (No. RR-7):1-43, available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6207.pdf.
• For the 2014–15 season, follow dosing guidelines in the 2014 ACIP influenza vaccine
recommendations.
For persons aged 9 years and older:
• Administer 1 dose.
~~~~~~
Vaccine schedule 2013:
(source: http://kidshealth.org/parent/growth/medical/immunization_chart.html)
[snip]
6 months and annually
Influenza: The vaccine is recommended every year for children 6 months and older. Kids under 9 who get a flu vaccine for the first time will receive it in two separate doses at least a month apart. Those younger than 9 who have been vaccinated in the past might still need two doses if they have not received at least two flu vaccinations since July 2010.
Kids 6 months to 5 years old are still considered the group of kids who most need the flu vaccine, but updated guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommend that all older kids and teens get it, too.
It’s especially important for high-risk kids to be vaccinated. High-risk groups include, but aren’t limited to, kids younger than 5 years old, and those with chronic medical conditions, such as asthma, heart problems, sickle cell anemia, diabetes, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
It can take up to 2 weeks after the shot is given for the body to build up immunity against the flu.
[snip]
Some vaccine schedules over time…
Vaccination Schedules 1980 through 1993
(source: http://onibasu.com/archives/am/65548.html)
Subject: ot – Vaccination Schedules 1980 through 1993
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 16:25:40 EST
Yahoo! Message Number: 65548
“I found this while searching the web, it’s the immunization schedules from
1980 through 1993. It shows how the # and types of vaccines increased
through the years. My son was “lucky” enough to be born in Feb. 1994 just in
time for the addition of the Hep. B vaccine. I’d really like to know who
looks at this schedule and thinks it’s a good idea to put so much junk into a
little baby’s body. In 1980 a child received 11 vaccines (25 different viruses – 19 of them by 18 mos of age) by age 4 to 6 that grew to at least 20 vaccines (34 different viruses – 27 of them by 18 mos of age) by 1993.” — Mary
IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE 1980:
2 Months DPT/OPV #1
4 Months DPT/OPV #2
6 Months DPT/OPV #3
15 Months MMR
18 Months DPT/OPV #4
4 to 6 Years DPT/OPV #5
14 to 16 Years dT
IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE 1985:
2 Months DPT/OPV #1
4 Months DPT/OPV #2
6 Months DPT/OPV #3
15 Months MMR
18 Months DPT/OPV #4
HIB*
4 to 6 Years DPT/OPV #5
14 to 16 Years dT
IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE 1989: (*)
2 Months DPT/OPV #1
4 Months DPT/OPV #2
6 Months DPT/OPV #3
Measles*
15 Months MMR(could be given at 12 Months), HIB
18 Months DPT/OPV #4
5 Years MMR #2*
6 Years DPT/OPV #5
10 Years MMR #2*
14 to 16 Years dT
*Change in Measles Vaccination :The American Academy of Pediatricians recommended a booster dose of Measles Vaccine to be administered as the MMR, and to be given to children in the Middle School, i.e., at the age of 10 or 11 years. The main concern at this time was to aid the population of non-responders to the initial MMR, and to boost and/or elicit a response at an age where most of disease was
occuring. The Advisory Committee For Immunization Practices (ACIP), a branch
of the CDC, recommended the booster dose of measles be administered as the
MMR at the age of 5 years. Their concern was patient control. As children
entered school, they appeared at Health Clinics to receive the required
immunizations for admission to school, and therefore they had some control of
the children in regards to their immunizations.
IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE 1990:
2 Months DPT/OPV #1
HIBTITER #1
4 Months DPT/OPV #2
HIBTITER #2
6 Months DPT/OPV #3
HIBTITER #3
15 Months MMR
HIBTITER #4
18 Months DPT/OPV #4
5 Years MMR #2
6 Years DPT/OPV #5
10 Years MMR #2*
14 to 16 Years dT
IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE 1993:
2 Months DPT/OPV #1
HIBTITER#1
HEPATITIS B #1
4 Months DPT/OPV #2
HIBTITER #2,
HEPATITIS B #2
6 Months DPT/OPV #3
HIBTITER #3
15 Months MMRV
HIBTITER #4
18 Months DPT/OPV #4
HEPATITIS B #3
5 Years MMR #2 (MMRV)
6 YEARS DPT/OPV #5
14 TO 16 YEARS dT
Vaccination schedule now includes Varicella vaccine as indicated in the 1993
schedule under MMRV.
~~~~
Note: Hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) — introduced for children in 1993/1994.
~~~~
fast forward to 2013,…
Vaccine schedule 2013:
(source: http://kidshealth.org/parent/growth/medical/immunization_chart.html)
Birth
HBV: Hepatitis B vaccine; recommended to give the first dose at birth, but may be given at any age for those not previously immunized.
1-2 months
HBV: Second dose should be administered 1 to 2 months after the first dose.
2 months
DTaP: Diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine
Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine
IPV: Inactivated poliovirus vaccine
PCV: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Rota: Rotavirus vaccine
4 months
DTaP
Hib
IPV
PCV
Rota
6 months
DTaP
Hib
PCV
Rota: This third dose may be needed, depending on the brand of vaccine used in previous immunizations.
6 months and annually
Influenza: The vaccine is recommended every year for children 6 months and older. Kids under 9 who get a flu vaccine for the first time will receive it in two separate doses at least a month apart. Those younger than 9 who have been vaccinated in the past might still need two doses if they have not received at least two flu vaccinations since July 2010.
Kids 6 months to 5 years old are still considered the group of kids who most need the flu vaccine, but updated guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommend that all older kids and teens get it, too.
It’s especially important for high-risk kids to be vaccinated. High-risk groups include, but aren’t limited to, kids younger than 5 years old, and those with chronic medical conditions, such as asthma, heart problems, sickle cell anemia, diabetes, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
It can take up to 2 weeks after the shot is given for the body to build up immunity against the flu.
6-18 months
HBV
IPV
12-15 months
Hib
MMR: Measles, mumps, and rubella (German measles) vaccine
PCV
Chickenpox (varicella)
12-23 months
HAV: Hepatitis A vaccine; given as two shots at least 6 months apart
15-18 months
DTaP
4-6 years
DTaP
MMR
IPV
Varicella
11-12 years
HPV: Human papillomavirus vaccine, given as 3 shots over 6 months. It’s recommended for both girls and boys to prevent genital warts and certain types of cancer.
Tdap: Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis booster. Also recommended during each pregnancy a woman has.
Meningococcal vaccine: And a booster dose is recommended at age 16.
College entrants
Meningococcal vaccine: Recommended for previously unvaccinated college students who will live in dormitories. One dose will suffice for healthy college students whose only risk factor is dorm living.
Special circumstances
HAV is recommended for kids 2 years and older who have not received the vaccine and are at increased risk of developing hepatitis A. This includes kids who live in states or will travel to countries where the disease is common.
Meningococcal vaccine can be given to kids as young as 2 months old who are at risk of contracting meningococcal disease, such as meningitis. This includes children with certain immune disorders as well as those who live in (or are planning to travel to) countries where meningitis is common. This vaccine also should be given to teens 13 and older who did not receive it in childhood.
Pneumococcal vaccines also can be given to older kids (age 2 and up) who have immunocompromising conditions, such as asplenia or HIV infection, or other conditions, like a cochlear implant.
Reviewed by: Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph, MD
Date reviewed: February 2013
[…] /www.jonrappoport.wordpress.com / link to original article […]
I am a Russian I have super immunity to influenza. I work for the best distributor of newspapers in Almetyevsk, I go around the city sell the newspaper for 15 years. A flu afraid of people who play sports in the fresh air. Not sick with diabetes mellitus other type of drink a lot of water. A flu does not like people who drink a lot of water. I propose to make a flu vaccine based on my blood.
[…] JonRappoport February 7 2014 […]
Reblogged this on ActivistPoster.
Readers of “Keep this in mind when they try to sell you a [Flu] pandemic” might also like,…
Keep this in mind when they try to sell you a bioterror attack.
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/06/10/a-staged-bioterror-attack/
[…] Pensem Nisto Quando vos Quiserem Vender Uma Pandemia […]
[…] Original Website: Jon Rappoport’s Blog Original Link: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/02/07/keep-this-in-mind-when-they-try-to-sell-you-a-pandemic/ […]
My colleagues were looking for 2014 IRS 4506-T a few weeks ago and found an online platform with a huge forms library . If others are searching for 2014 IRS 4506-T too , http://vaers.hhs.gov/resources/vaers_form.pdf