Sebelius: “I don’t work for the people” who want me to resign
by Jon Rappoport
October 28, 2013
“Affordable…together,” the two primary propaganda messages of Obamacare, and a phrase which might be the new Pledge of Allegiance, aren’t cutting it.
Sebelius said, “The majority of people calling for me to resign, I would say, are people I don’t work for and who do not want this program [Obamacare] to work in the first place.”
As head of the Dept. of Health and Human Services, she works for her boss, the President, who is supposed to work for the American people, but doesn’t.
No president works for the American people. If he did, he would risk life and limb to expose the criminals who really run this country.
And that’s the political tipping point we’ve reached. Actually, we tipped a long time ago. It’s just becoming a lot more obvious now.
The job of a Washington politician shouldn’t be about defending federal programs. It should be about exposing what government has become. It should be about highlighting psychopaths who hold office. It should be about explaining to the American people how, on the truly big issues, like Globalism, both political parties operate as one crime family.
The job of a Washington politician should be about exposing Wall St. and the banksters who hold government and the people hostage. It should be about exposing corporations like Monsanto, who have wormed their way deep into government and infected its body.
Sebelius is a little martinet, a functionary with a weather vane on her head to detect which way the political winds are blowing. She’s right. She doesn’t work for the people who want her to resign. She doesn’t work for the people who want her to stay. She works for the machine.
A machine requires a designer and operators, but once it gathers momentum, it moves on its own. It advances across the landscape like a programmed robot, spouting homilies.
Deep in its guts, the command is: Invent reality for the masses and enforce it.
Healthcare.gov, the site that enrolls people in Obamacare, is one of those moments where a sub-sub reality-program of the robot fails and crashes.
But backing up from it for better perspective, we can see that failures, crashes, and scandals are built into the overall reality-invention program, to engender chaos.
Chaos is an opportunity for the robot to bring in greater control to “restore security.”
And if we were to gain even greater distance from all this, we would see that, at a much deeper level, millions and millions of people want to offload the machine altogether.
Millions and millions of people want to end lives of automatic function, because they know that life can be so much more.
In the robot, they see themselves surrendering, and they don’t like the view.
They want out.
They want a story and a future that supersedes the robot.
They want health, not sickness-care. They want choices, not orders from above. They want open space, not the claustrophobia of regulations. They want energy, not obedience. They want the open sky of their own imagination, not one program after another. They want freedom, not fascist geometry.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
I don’t agree with Sebelius either but I think she’s being honest about how she see’s her role. She works for the President and through him also serves Wall Street, the central banks, insurance corporations, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, and all the largest donors to whom they owe return favors.
Wanting good health, one need not look for it, create it. We heal from within, that is why the placebo pill has a success rate, depending upon the study give or take, 50%. A body is going to be as healthy as one makes up their “mind” “to be”…
The hell with insurance, it is not assurance. Forget about seeking freedom from a system that was created to control. Walk away and don’t look back. Start living the life one was meant to have – It is a birth right.
It has become obvious that you are are Sayanim.
Not obvious to me, Afshin. Why don’t you elaborate?
Jon argues passionately and eloquently for individualism, not Zionism. Maybe you are Sayanim?
Well, Ms. Sebelius, President Obama works for us; so, that puts you on the lower scale of those who work for us. We DO NOT work for you. Period. Our Senators and Representatives work for us; and, if we tell them to fire you, well, guess what; you can be fired. You don’t have any immunity from dismissal. You haven’t been doing a decent job; so, you don’t belong in your current post.
You must take responsibility for your actions, just as the rest of us do. You’re a human being; you’re NOT a goddess; thus, you must take responsibility for every action you take or fail to take. That’s the law of nature, and you cannot escape that law. Nobody can.
[…] Jon Rappoport’s Blog (No Ratings Yet) […]
Sebelius is right. She DOES NOT work for anyone else.
The moment you grant any sanction or legitimacy to the heterons, you are condoning the very existence of the heteronomous power relationship.
I’m frankly sick of hearing people criticise the government in terms of structural or otherwise superficial points. The actions done in the name of ‘government’ are fundamentally, morally wrong, and they should not be given any sanction, let alone should the belief be sustained that there are alternative , ‘good’ governments.
By saying “it’s not the job of government to do X,Y,Z”, the critic is half-right. What they ignore is that government have no job, or any principled reason to exist, at all.
[…] JonRappoport […]
I’m completely onboard with “end[ing] lives of automatic function” and I hope you’re right that “millions and millions of people” feel the same. I have to admit to being somewhat discouraged when highly intelligent and seemingly well informed people I know, who should be able to see through the fallacies of the system, continue to love authority and will argue in favor of their own and everyone else’s subjugation to it. I do see some of the younger generation, my children and some of their peers in particular, ‘waking up’ though, so maybe there’s still a chance for freedom to flourish.
Its Stockholm Syndrome, mixed with Cassandra Curse
Sebelius was the insurance commissioner in Kansas. She chased all insurance carriers of personal insurance out of the state except Blue Cross Blue Shield. The governors house was the reward. She was an obvious choice for the HHS as her next step over the top of the people. She’s an arrogant bitch that thinks she’s bullet proof with big business and now big government behind her. SHE WAS HATED IN KANSAS, but when you’re willing to wear knee pads to get a “head” the machine will reward you.
Jon Rappoport is, hands down, the finest essayist in the United States.
She’s telling the truth, she works for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), created by ERISA, and since the Constitution does not allow the Federal Government to form a corporation, the PBGC is chartered.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is an independent agency of the United States government that was created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to encourage the continuation and maintenance of voluntary private defined benefit pension plans, provide timely and uninterrupted payment of pension benefits, and keep pension insurance premiums at the lowest level necessary to carry out its operations.
OBAMACARE IS AN AMENDMENT TO ERISA, EMPLOTEES OF FOREIGN AFFILIATES, THE REASON HEALTHCARE.gov is located in CANADA.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections
A Rule by the Internal Revenue Service, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, and the Health and Human Services Department on 06/28/2010
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2010/06/28/2010-15278/patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act-preexisting-condition-exclusions-lifetime-and-annual#h-38
I. Background Back to Top
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Affordable Care Act), Public Law 111-148, was enacted on March 23, 2010; the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (the Reconciliation Act), Public Law 111-152, was enacted on March 30, 2010. The Affordable Care Act and the Reconciliation Act reorganize, amend, and add to the provisions of part A of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) relating to group health plans and health insurance issuers in the group and individual markets. The term “group health plan” includes both insured and self-insured group health plans. [1] The Affordable Care Act adds section 715(a)(1) to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and section 9815(a)(1) to the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) to incorporate the provisions of part A of title XXVII of the PHS Act into ERISA and the Code, and make them applicable to group health plans, and health insurance issuers providing health insurance coverage in connection with group health plans. The PHS Act sections incorporated by this reference are sections 2701 through 2728. PHS Act sections 2701 through 2719A are substantially new, though they incorporate some provisions of prior law. PHS Act sections 2722 through 2728 are sections of prior law renumbered, with some, mostly minor, changes.
Subtitles A and C of title I of the Affordable Care Act amend the requirements of title XXVII of the PHS Act (changes to which are incorporated into ERISA section 715). The preemption provisions of ERISA section 731 and PHS Act section 2724 [2] (implemented in 29 CFR 2590.731(a) and 45 CFR 146.143(a)) apply so that the requirements of part 7 of ERISA and title XXVII of the PHS Act, as amended by the Affordable Care Act, are not to be “construed to supersede any provision of State law which establishes, implements, or continues in effect any standard or requirement solely relating to health insurance issuers in connection with group or individual health insurance coverage except to the extent that such standard or requirement prevents the application of a requirement” of the Affordable Care Act. Accordingly, State laws that impose on health insurance issuers requirements that are stricter than the requirements imposed by the Affordable Care Act will not be superseded by the Affordable Care Act.
__________________________________________________________________________-
ERISA stands for the Employees Retirement Income Security Act, and is assigned a Public Law number, 93-406. The last matter is to determine the purpose of the law, and more importantly if it’s applicable in the several states.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (Pub.L. 93–406, 88 Stat. 829, enacted September 2, 1974, codified in part at 29 U.S.C. ch. 18).
CONCLUSION
All law passed by Congress, that effect the American people have to be published in the PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (link provided below) if we consult the Parallel Table of Authorities, Public Law, 93-406 ERISA, is not published. Furthermore, even if it were published, there are no regulations, so it would be void.
PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AND RULES
http://www.gpo.gov/help/parallel_table.pdf
Authorities
Public Laws—Continued
93–400…………………………………….32 Part 169
93–415 ……………………………………..28 Part 22
________________________________________________________________-
Public law 93-406 ERISA, is an amendment to Title 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE , section 3121 (L)
EMPLOYEES OF FOREIGN AFFILIATES.
Title 26 – INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle A – Income Taxes
CHAPTER 1 – NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES
Subchapter D – Deferred Compensation, Etc.
PART I – PENSION, PROFIT-SHARING, STOCK BONUS PLANS, ETC.
Subpart A – General Rule
*Sec. 406 – Employees of foreign affiliates covered by section 3121(l) agreements
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1974 AMENDMENT
PUBLIC LAW 93-406 EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT
Amendment by section 1016(a)(4) of Pub. L. 93–406 applicable, except as otherwise provided in section 1017(c) through (i) of Pub. L. 93–406, for plan years beginning after Sept. 2, 1974, but, in the case of plans in existence on Jan. 1, 1974, amendment by Pub. L. 93–406 applicable for plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 1975, see section 1017 of Pub. L. 93–406, set out as an Effective Date; Transition of Rules note under section 410 of this title.
She’s right. She don’t work and the people want her to resign.