The strangest thing about vaccines

The strangest thing about vaccines

by Jon Rappoport

October 3, 2013

www.nomorefakenews.com

I didn’t say the worst thing. I said the strangest.

Here it is: Proponents claim a vaccine stimulates a person’s immune system to produce antibodies, which are immune-system scouts.

This is supposedly a rehearsal. The immune system gets a chance to respond to a “test run,” so that when the real disease hits, the immune-defense will be ready and will knock out the disease quickly.

Except there are many diagnostic tests for disease that look for antibodies, and if antibodies show up, the doctor tells the patient he has the disease.

It’s absurd.

Antibodies from a vaccine=immunity. Same antibodies produced by the body in response to a germ entering the body=illness.

On top of this insanity, antibodies are only one component of a very complex immune system. The production of antibodies doesn’t guarantee a person’s whole immune system is in good shape.

Yes, I know there are many other strange and absurd and destructive and ineffective vaccine-factors, but the above contradiction is surely the strangest.


The Matrix Revealed


In 1987, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC. (note: AIDS INC. is included in THE MATRIX REVEALED), I queried the FDA about the development of an HIV vaccine. Here is what I was told: if a vaccine was ever deployed, it would produce antibodies to HIV and the person would be given a letter to carry around with him in case he was ever tested for HIV.

The letter would say, this person is immune from HIV. The antibodies are an indication of immunity, not disease.

You see, the two standard diagnostic tests for HIV were the Elisa and the Western Blot. They both tested for antibodies. If a person tested positive, he was told he had AIDS.

But if the SAME antibodies were produced by the vaccine, he’d be designated immune from AIDS.

No, that couldn’t be.

Yes, it could be and was.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJGyN3gCsBg&w=420&h=315]

Jon Rappoport

The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

13 comments on “The strangest thing about vaccines

  1. […] Jon Rappoport: The strangest thing about vaccines […]

  2. Shayne says:

    This is technically incorrect. Antibody production means only that you have been exposed to a stimulant (ie:antigen) and it has caused you to react by producing antibodies. It does not mean that you have disease, only that you’ve been exposed to it, or something with cross-reactivity.

  3. Afshin Nejat says:

    The amazing level of immunity the human masses of fake beings have when it comes to facing contradictions… Truth just doesn’t matter to them. They are immune.

  4. lburns432 says:

    I totally agree with you Jon.
    A while back, I think around 2009, the threat here in Canada was H1N1, which was purported to be a world pandemic. The WHO (World Health Organization) even got in on this cluster frak. I remember advertisements in the papers, even our small local paper, Television news ran with that ball to enth degree….oooohhh the scare. Blood in the streets, comparable to 1922 Spanish flu. Thousands will die children and pregnant women are especially susceptible to such a scourge. They came out with a spray version of the vaccine, an adjunctive to counter possible effects of the Thiomersal on the young and developing fetuses within the pregnant.
    I remember the school kids and their lineup for dates for vaccinations according to grades. I remember a school nurse threatening my daughter about my grandson, and her unborn child in her womb. And the guilt trip of infecting other children. The overcrowding at medical clinics for vaccines. Clinics reporting they had run out of vaccine, and people driving hundreds of miles to other locations.
    Millions of vaccinations were bought by the Canadian government for this grand hoax. Huge tax payer dollars on this baby!
    I remember my wife getting the virus and having similar symptoms to a normal flu, if there is such a thing. Coughing, sneezing, the runs….the usual. Nothing that could knock down a French girl with peasant genes, she felt miserable for a few days, but her immune system did what nature had evolved it to do. She endured, even though some people treated her like Typhoid Mary, she built anti-bodies to fight the virus. She was not hospitalized; she was not even in bed most times. And in the end the flu was not what had been reported to the public. The spin doctors got a hold this scare, and turned it into Triple X fear porn. And Big Pharma stocks jumped considerable that few weeks. I remember following this scam closely.
    A close friend of mine who is a bit hypochondriac was adamant about a shot regardless of what I expressed to him. He was upset because it was women and children and old people first. He had felt it should be a first come first serve. People were completely whacko. Every conversation at that period of time was about H1N1. In the end
    Worldwide deaths reported in Wikipedia were:
    Area Confirmed deaths
    Worldwide (total) 14,286
    European Union and EFTA 2,290
    Other European countries
    and Central Asia 457
    Mediterranean and Middle East 1,450
    Africa 116
    North America 3,642
    Central America and Caribbean 237
    South America 3,190
    Northeast Asia and South Asia 2,294
    Southeast Asia 393
    Australia and Pacific 217
    But of course they will claim the vaccines saved the day. What they fail to tell is that the flu happens every year, and there are deaths from it. That older people and people born before 1957 that had experienced flu before had pre-existing anti-bodies that attacked the H1N1 virus. And that those people would have passed that genetic information to their progeny. Children and grand-children. The people who were dying from the virus had compromised immune systems or breathing problems to begin with, illnesses like Bronchitis, pneumonia; you get the picture, don’t you. I am ranting now….it’s was a total scam. The Pharmaceutical Companies made a fortune on this. It was a hoax. A total hoax. But no one has reported on it, I have never seen even a sixty minutes type of exposé. A story in a newspaper.
    We are the best that nature has to create to this date; this planet has been evolving for 4.5 billion years supposedly. There is nothing as adapted as the human being, we have gone through extinctions, plagues, viruses, diseases, mutations, organisms from space. Who knows…..but suddenly in the last sixty year we have no immunity against anything. We are as weak as kittens. We need roughly 139 vaccinations before we hit the age of 18 years old. What I know….is those vaccinations are not there to protect you…they are there to attack and weaken your immune system. They are there to stress it.
    In Canada 45,000 people die a year from cigarette related lung cancer, they print it on the side of cigarette packages.
    Now that’s an epidemic!

    Michael Burns

    ~~~

    Ed. note:

    see also…

    http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/06/27/how-swine-flu-was-invented/

  5. abinico warez says:

    Jon, I like your blog, but when you say “and if antibodies show up, the doctor tells the patient he has the disease…” – you are wrong. The doctor would say you either have the disease, or you had it in the past.

  6. D Thomas says:

    Hmm… that’s like saying a police presence will not deter crime as every time I have walked past the scene of a crime there have always been loads of police there.

    Viruses work by forcing their way into a cell, reproducing themselves hundreds or even thousands of times using the cell’s protein copying facilities, and then bursting out of the cell to go and infect hundreds of other cells. If you don’t have antibodies against a virus it will reproduce exponentially for a while before your body produces antibodies. This means the viral load will be too great for your body to get under control quickly.
    If you already have antibodies against that virus they can act against the virus before it gets a chance to reproduce exponentially.

    Understanding exponential growth is crucial to understanding why having antibodies for a disease before you catch it means you don’t get sick from it.

  7. […] The strangest thing about vaccines (jonrappoport.wordpress.com) […]

  8. Daniel says:

    Why do they run a series of three blood cultures? It’s a matter of scale, as you know.

  9. Douglas Shelley says:

    And as I understand it if a person is killed in a traffic accident and the autopsy shows he had the flu the person is reported as being killed by the influenza virus.

  10. Firefalcon says:

    Video is private… 🙁

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *