Warming the political planet

DECEMBER 17, 2009.  If the fraud called climate science is accepted by governments around the world, what actions will they launch?

First of all, judging by the Copenhagen Conference fiasco, the economic/political agenda has taken a hit.  But they’ll keep coming back for more, you can be sure of that.

Meanwhile, here is something I found at Watts Up With That?, a popular climate-science site.  In an article titled “Revealed: the UK government strategy for personal carbon rations,” by Tony Brown, there is a quote cited from the Environmental Audit Committee minutes, House of Commons:  

“Personal carbon rations would have to be mandatory, imposed by Government in the same way that food rationing was introduced in the UK in 1939… Each person would receive an electronic card containing their year’s carbon credits …the card would have to be presented when purchasing energy or travel services, and the correct amount of carbon deducted. The technologies and systems already in place for direct debit systems and credit cards could be used.”

Lovely.  Is there is also a deduction for the CO2 emitted during heavy breathing while watching porn?

Proposals like the one offered by the environmental audit committee stem from the imposed notion of LIMITS.  The total “safe” limit for carbon emissions on the planet.  The total limit of available resources in the world.  The limit of population. 

The Club of Rome is famous for discussing limits.  Implicit in all these boundaries is the idea that economies and governments must be planned and arranged, from the top down, based on calculations and models for “what is available on the planet.”

Some one-world thinkers also try to factor in “the pace of technical innovation,” as absurd as that guess would be.

Of course, throughout these models, we see plans for wealth/resource allocation and redistribution.  “The rich give to the poor.”

In fact, based on climate science, there is much talk of reparations to Third World nations.  For what?  The answers range from “poverty” to “loss of dignity.”  And this is connected to (fake) global warming exactly how?

If you want to repay Third World nations for insult and injury, why blame the millions of taxpayers who would shoulder the expense now?

But, I digress.  Actually, this wealth transfer and reparations scheme is just a cover story.  You can be sure that, among the miles of solar collectors and windmills in Africa, mining and drilling and giant agri-farming will step up operations—and grab some of that “reparation” to do it.  Free money is always welcomed.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *