Mercury/vaccines/autism: more CDC fraud

by Jon Rappoport

August 27, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

In the 1990s, people around the world began to wake up and realize: there is mercury in vaccines.

Mercury.

“That’s a poison, isn’t it? Warnings are issued about eating fish laced with mercury…but injecting it is safe?”

The public reaction was swift, explosive, instinctive, and correct: “They’re poisoning us and our children.”

Some of this poisoning was called autism. Some of it was called “neuro-developmental delay.” There were other names and categories.

The uproar was so loud, Congress was forced to act. In 1997, they ordered the FDA to examine the situation.

So in June of 2000, three full years later, because the federal government really cares but only cares slowly, the famous Simpsonwood Meeting convened (see also here).

The star of that meeting was a CDC scientist named Thomas Verstraeten. Tommy had done extensive work on vaccines and neuro-developmental delay. It was so extensive almost nobody could understand it.

At Simpsonwood, a gaggle of other scientists, FDA and CDC people, and pharma types sat in their chairs while Tommy showed mind-numbing slide after slide and explained each one.

The CDC people prayed Tommy would be convincing. After all, the CDC is in charge of vaccine safety and also buys billions of dollars of vaccines, which it distributes to public health agencies in all 50 states.

Tommy, with his slide show, explained he had homed in on neuro-developmental delay in children, and had examined many different groupings of vaccinated children to discover a connection, if any, to the vaccines.

There is a transcript of the whole Simpsonwood Meeting. 286 pages. It’s like reading the Talmud backwards or an old Manhattan phone book whose pages have been taken out of alphabetical order.

Tommy’s thrust, of course, was to exonerate mercury in vaccines and give these vaccines a free pass. Which he eventually did, in the final version of a study published three times.

In the Simpsonwood transcript, the real explosion comes on page 43. No one, to my knowledge, has emphasized this enough.

On page 43, a Dr. Rapin asks Tommy a basic question:

“How did they make these diagnoses [of neuro-developmental delay, aka neurological damage, in the children you’re tracking]?”

Tommy replies: “What I am presenting to you now is just the results of the automated data. That means I don’t know anything about how these diagnoses were made…[but later in my presentation we’ll be in a] better position, at least for some of the outcomes [of neuro-developmental delay] to tell you how they were diagnosed.”

Translation. The whole presentation has just fallen apart.

In conventional medical terms, EVERYTHING Tommy is doing depends on the idea that accurate diagnoses of children were made. But he’s suddenly exposed.

Analogy: We’re going to evaluate the success of a treatment for cancer…but we don’t know whether the thousands of diagnoses of cancer we’re studying were correct.

A Dr. Davis then cuts in: “…nowhere today or tomorrow will you ever hear that…[these children] were carefully examined in the neuropsychiatric clinic. These kids…are seen by regular old pediatricians…the original [diagnostic] coding is [done by] a pediatrician or a family physician who is making the diagnosis.”

In other words, it’s all baloney. Smoke and mirrors. By conventional standards of medicine, neurological-damage diagnoses made by non-specialists are worthless for the purposes of research.

As if sensing that his fraudulent game is about to explode, Tommy says, “Just for the sake of the presentation, could I go on? I see that we are going into questions about other issues.”

Yes, other issues like validity and truth and value. Nothing serious. Nothing is riding on Tommy’s Talmudic slide show, except the health and future of millions of children.

Tommy is basically saying, “Don’t interrupt me. My system of nonsense will collapse if we worry about accuracy of diagnosis. We don’t really know what these kids have. But I must move ahead and pretend I’m doing science.”

The CDC and the US government, when they are challenged and re-challenged about the dangers of mercury in vaccines and the connection to autism, always point to Tommy as the ultimate backup. The prince of numbers.

Tommy is a fabricator.

The public knows: mercury is poison. It causes nerve and brain damage. Call that autism. Call it whatever you want to. Injecting it is a crime.

That’s the beginning and end of the question.

Except for one thing. And now we leave the conventional world of medicine…

Over the last several years, I have presented irrefutable evidence that NO so-called mental disorder is confirmed by a diagnostic test.

Read the bible of the psychiatric profession, the DSM. For the roughly 300 officially certified mental disorders, there is not a single defining blood test, urine test, hair test, brain scan, genetic assay. Nothing.

All the “neuro-developmental delays,” including autism, are classified as mental disorders and are listed in the DSM. They are nothing but menus and clusters of behaviors.

So even if all those kids Tommy was studying in his “research” had been diagnosed in a neuropsychiatric clinic, it would have meant nothing.

Because there are no tests. None.

It was a house of cards.

A titanic fraud. From the outset.

A baby is vaccinated with the neurological poison called mercury. The baby never enters the world. The baby is damaged. That’s the fact.

Constructing categories of disorders and different groups of children is a vast smokescreen.

Here’s my slideshow: arrest the criminals, send everybody out of the CDC buildings, fumigate the buildings, and shut them down.

Save future lives.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

CDC whistleblower is just the tip of the iceberg

by Jon Rappoport

August 26, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, has yet to step into the light and make a full and definitive statement about the CDC concealing MMR-vaccine dangers.

Mothers of autistic children are now preparing a class-action suit against the CDC for covering up the MMR vaccine-autism connection. They will undoubtedly want Thompson as a witness.

He can talk now or talk later.

The public at large still has blind faith in “medical experts” and the truth of published studies.

Fraud at the CDC? A study that was intentionally distorted to give a pass to a toxic and highly dangerous vaccine? What? How could that be?

Well, here’s a medical expert. For 20 years, she had a front-row seat that very few doctors or researchers ever occupy. Thousands of medical studies arrived at her desk. She was a “queen of judgment.”

She is Dr. Marcia Angell. She was the editor of the most prestigious medical journal in the world, The New England Journal of Medicine.

On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell’s devastating assessment of medical literature:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” —(Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

Here is another quote of a similar nature, also published in the NY Review of Books (May 12, 2001, Helen Epstein, “Flu Warning: Beware of Drug Companies”):

“Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false.”

Here’s another quote from the same article:

“Last year, GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug Avandia was linked to thousands of heart attacks, and earlier in the decade, the company’s antidepressant Paxil was discovered to exacerbate the risk of suicide in young people. Merck’s painkiller Vioxx was also linked to thousands of heart disease deaths. In each case, the scientific literature gave little hint of these dangers.”

And finally, here is yet another statement from Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine:

“A review of seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies [that praised the drugs] were published. But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome.”

It turns out that the informational pipeline that feeds the entire perception of pharmaceutical medicine is a rank fraud.

So…a 2004 study at the CDC that intentionally buried the MMR vaccine’s connection to autism?

It’s just business.

Tell that to parents of autistic children.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

CDC vaccine-autism fraud: what victory looks like

by Jon Rappoport

August 25, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

Here’s a clue: victory doesn’t look like a trickle of hidden data occasionally seeping out of a cavern.

This is all about making a case. An explosive case.

Most (honest) scientists don’t have a clue. They don’t know how or why a story explodes. They tend to favor the “trickle theory” of releasing information because it fits their notion of order and pattern.

Order and pattern have nothing to do with the asymmetrical way a story expands.

Maybe CDC whistleblower William Thompson eventually comes forward with a definitive public statement about egregious fraud at the CDC; maybe he doesn’t.

Waiting for him to do the right thing is a loser’s game.

There is another avenue to pursue:

The CDC data that would reveal fraud.

Data contradicting the CDC assertion that there is no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Whistleblower Thompson apparently claims the “no-connection” study was massaged, cooked, stepped on. Key pieces were buried.

Where is that buried data? All of it. Who has it?

I’m not talking about one or two pages we can barely see on a video.

There are several people out there who state they have a trove of incriminating data.

So: release it!

Now.

All of it.

Every single page, with the CDC imprints, mastheads, dates, etc.

—Data proving fraud, proving there was, in fact, knowledge that the MMR vaccine was, and is, connected to increased rates of autism.

Release all that data; post it on websites around the world.

No summaries—the raw material.

I understand that, among honorable scientists who have this data right now, there is a strong tendency to want to organize it and comment on it and assess it down to the periods and commas and semi-colons.

To those people, I say: you’re making a huge and potentially lethal mistake.

Organize and comment and summarize and analyze to your heart’s content—after you post every shred of raw data for all to see.

This isn’t an either-or issue.

Nor is it an issue of “preserving data so experts can make judgments about it.”

Dump the data online. Now.

People mistakenly think that, once all the data are publicly available, “the story” will peter out and die.

This belief has been used to support the drip-method journalists have deployed with the Edward Snowden material.

One scandal today, another one next month, and so on.

The truth is, releasing all the data has no ill effect on “the story” at all.

We’re talking about parallel operations here. On one track, you dump all the data online. On a separate track, you do articles and videos homing in on various pieces of the material.

You do both.

This isn’t a debate among scientific colleagues who publish in the same journals and speak at the same conferences and teach at universities.

This is a war.

It’s a war against a major institution of government, the CDC, and its pharmaceutical, academic, and media partners.

There is a trove of data that proves the CDC has engaged in criminal fraud, has exonerated a vaccine that actually causes brain damage? Release the data.

What are you waiting for?

Whistleblower William Thompson supposedly sent this trove of data to several scientists—they have it. They’ve had it for a while.

Are they using it to stuff a couch?

“Well, you see, if we release all the data, most people won’t understand what it means. They’re not technically trained.”

So what?

Who cares?

There are thousands of people out there who are a) technically trained and b) have independent minds.

“Well, people need someone to interpret the data for them.”

Fine. You interpret it. After you’ve released all of it.

“If we release all of it now, scientists who are part of the establishment will twist it and claim it proves nothing.”

Those scientists are already calling you liars. They twist and obfuscate for a living. Once you release all the data, yes, they will undoubtedly say it proves nothing. Then it’s your job to show they’re wrong.

Can you handle that?

If you’ve got the goods, lay them out on the table.

Many thousands of smart people around the world are going to come to your defense and blow this whole thing sky-high.

The CDC will begin to scurry like rats, and some of those rats will come out and confess their sins. Old sins. New sins. Sins you haven’t even imagined.

THIS is how a story builds.

You expose everything you have, and then new whistleblowers show up to spill secrets that are far more incriminating than the secrets you’ve exposed.

By holding back the data you have, you slow down the process and even stop it.

Release. All. The. Incriminating. Data.

Now.

Start a storm.

There is this little thing called the Internet. It can create enormous force, if enough people climb on board.

Reflect on the untold numbers of mothers with autistic children, and the mothers of the future who will have autistic children. Do you really think they care about trickle theory and timed-release?

I’ve met some of those current mothers and talked to them. They don’t live in ivory towers.

I can tell you, they take no prisoners.

They want your data. All of it.

Give it to them.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Rob Schneider says he has smoking gun on vaccine-autism CDC fraud

by Jon Rappoport

August 24, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

Here is a copy of a letter actor and comedian Rob Schneider sent to California Governor Jerry Brown’s office Friday. It is posted at canaryparty.org.

Schneider is to be commended and supported in every possible way for stepping forward.

Schneider writes: “I have copies of the original CDC report that was later suppressed and fraudulently changed.”

I urge Schneider to post that report now.

From: Rob Schneider
Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:20 PM
Subject: CDC Autism Whistleblower Admits Vaccine Study Fraud – CNN iReport
To: Lark Park, Deputy Legislative Secretary, Governor’s office

Dear Ms. Park,

This is Rob Schneider. I want to first thank you for calling me several years ago when Governor Brown signed into law AB2109, the requirement for all parents of school children to have to “be counseled” to get a Doctor’s note in order to obtain a vaccine exemption to attend public school in California.

As you may or may or not know this has caused hardships all over the state as Doctors have refused to meet with parents who want the exemption form signed and families who have been threatened with or have been kicked out of medical practices for not going along with the exact Vaccine schedule, currently 49 shots of over 16 different Vaccines before the age of Six Years old. This in spite of a family’s objections whose child may have had another sibling that had a bad reaction to a particular Vaccine.

This policy of one size fits all Vaccine schedule for every child is as absurd as giving the same eye prescription glasses to every child. The fact is EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT and there is currently NO SYSTEM or thought to which child could be more susceptible to adverse reactions including permanent injury and death from any Vaccine or Vaccine ingredients.

Since I have opposed this undemocratic and onerous legislation (and Law) from its inception, I have kept up on how it has affected families in California. Now there is more reason than ever to be concerned, even outraged, by the CDC and by AB 2109.

A top Scientist and Researcher for the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. William Thompson PHD, who did the major research safety study for the Measles Mumps and Rubella Vaccine (MMR) has come forward as a whistleblower and admitted that the MMR study was in fact fraudulent. (I have attached a link of the news story from CNN for your convenience).

As a concerned citizen of the State of California, I feel compelled to share with you proof the CDC committed fraud (I have copies of the original CDC report that was later suppressed and fraudulently changed). One disturbing disclosure, AFRICAN AMERICAN CHILDREN were and still are THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY PERCENT more likely to develop Autism under the current Vaccine MMR schedule. This according to the original CDC study in 2001.

My question to you and Governor Brown is, how many children in California in the last thirteen years since this report have been hurt? How many children in the US have been permanently damaged?

Lastly, how many MORE children will be needlessly injured because of the bill Governor Brown signed?

Before I pay for advertisements in News outlets, Sacramento Bee, etc, I would like to hear what Governor Brown has to say in light of this new information.

This letter is being sent to my Representative in Congress, Congressman Sherman and to my friend Congressman Posey of Florida and to both our State Senators as well as to other media outlets.

I await your call or email and Governor Brown’s prompt response.
The children of California deserve nothing less.

Sincerely,

Rob Schneider

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com