GRIEF IS NOW A DISEASE

 

GRIEF IS NOW A DISEASE

 

by Jon Rappoport

www.nomorefakenews.com

 

MARCH 23, 2012. The current issue of Psychiatric Times reports that the new bible of mental disorders, the DSM-V, will make grief a mental disorder.

 

Specifically, a parent who deeply mourns the loss of a child for more than TWO WEEKS will rate a diagnosis of clinical depression (and of course, drugging with one of the toxic SSRI antidepressants.)

 

This absurdity is even too much for some doctors, and they’re rebelling. For example, see Dr. Joanne Cacciatore’s blog post here.

 

But the “experts” who are assembling the upcoming DSM-V don’t care. They’re shrugging off the criticism so far.

 

Well, of course they would. There is a lot of money to be made by prescribing more drugs, in this case, to grieving parents.

 

The Psychiatric Times’ editorial attacking this lunatic classification of grief-as-disease is written by none other than Dr. Allen Frances.

 

Dr. Allen Frances has summed up position on the lunatic classification of grief-as-disease in this post on the Huffington Post Blog published on Mar 23, 2012.

 

Readers will remember my recent article about the good doctor. He is the man who was in charge of assembling the previous DSM-IV. His team expanded the definitions of ADHD and Bipolar, so that many more people would be dosed with toxic and destructive drugs like Valproate, Lithium, and Ritalin.

 

In fact, Dr. Frances, in a December 2010 Wired interview by Gary Greenberg (entitled Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness), stated: “There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.” [Emphasis added]

 

I’m not kidding. He actually said it. Here is the opening opening paragraph of the article:

 

“Every so often Al Frances says something that seems to surprise even him. Just now, for instance, in the predawn darkness of his comfortable, rambling home in Carmel, California, he has broken off his exercise routine to declare that ‘there is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.’ Then an odd, reflective look crosses his face, as if he’s taking in the strangeness of this scene: Allen Frances, lead editor of the fourth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (universally known as the DSM-IV), the guy who wrote the book on mental illness, confessing that ‘these concepts are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the boundaries.’ For the first time in two days, the conversation comes to an awkward halt.” [Emphasis added]

 

The complete article can be found at wired.com here.

 

Which would be like the chairman of Exxon asserting, “We need to explore for more oil. Of course, cars don’t really work. They don’t go anywhere. They’re fictions. Delusions.”

 

The committees who put together these DSMs would be better off posting a list of a few hundred human behaviors on a wall and, blindfolded, throwing darts at them.

 

What lies below this latest psychiatric nonsense about grief is an entire industrial complex. It’s dedicated to brainwashing the public into accepting the notion of discrete and real mental disorders.

 

People have problems, they become frustrated and confused, they suffer, but the act of carving up behavior and thought into diseases is a way of a) expanding business and b) extending the Matrix.

 

More and more, as a result of relentless PR, the public believes there are a whole host of mental disorders that not only intrude on their lives but require pharmaceutical treatment.

 

The public believes they are victimized by these diseases and can alleviate them only through drugs.

 

The public believes it is “humane” to accept the existence of these diseases, and we must all join together to “remove the stigma of diagnosis.”

 

The public believes they are at the mercy of arbitrary shifts of brain chemistry that bring on these diseases.

 

The public believes, therefore, that life itself is limited by the potential onset of “psychiatric illness.”

 

The public believes we’re all, to one degree or another, disabled.

 

The public believes what they’re told to believe. Therefore, the fictitious existence of discrete mental disorders becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

The Matrix op called psychiatry provides a focal point, around which are woven many strands of propaganda. The overall objective? A future world that resembles, to a remarkable degree, a Universal Hospital, in which the population, granted “free” care, lives through dozens of diagnoses of diseases and disorders, with (toxic) treatments—from cradle to grave. The eternal patient.

 

Further propaganda strives to label such a life the hallmark of What Humans Are.

 

That is the high-level objective of the medical/psychiatric cartel.

 

What makes psychiatry different is that it seeks to gain control and domination over the entire area of human behavior, through classification by labels and bogus claims of diagnosis.

 

As I mentioned in the article on Dr. Frances, there are no definitive chemical or biological tests for any so-called mental disorder. This fact is stunning to people. They automatically assume psychiatry is a science. It isn’t. It’s a shell game.

 

I refer now to the PBS FRONTLINE presentation, Does ADHD Exist? A quite revealing (and side-splitting) exchange occurs between the interviewer and Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. Barkley is also the author of books about ADHD.

 

INTERVIEWER: Skeptics say that there’s no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.

 

BARKLEY: That’s tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn’t have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid…There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn’t make them invalid. [Emphasis added]

 

Live long and prosper, Dr. Barkley. And you might want to re-check the definition of science. Just a thought.

 

Here is a final prediction for you:

 

Author/psychologist Paul Babiak recently stated that a psychopath is someone with “a psychopathic personality.”

 

Quite informative.

 

My prediction?

 

We’re going to see an accelerated push to label many career criminals—on the street and in corporate boardrooms—as ill with the disease of psychopathy. Now, I’m old-fashioned. I believe you prosecute people like that to the fullest extent of the law.

 

The point is, though, the definition of psychopathy is going to be extended to those people who, in the view of mental health professionals, show a lack of empathy, who aren’t happy to live in the Global Village, where Share and Care are actually, at a high level, fronts for advancing the cause of Globalism.

 

Schoolchildren who don’t want to play the usual games, who don’t want to join the group are going to be examined for signs of incipient psychopathy.

 

The agenda will be to weed out people who are free and independent. Label them. Treat them. Drug them. Isolate them from the rest of us.

 

Your son is what some people would call an outsider. But actually, he’s case of psychopathy in progress. We have to act now. I’m not saying he’s a Lee Oswald or a Jack the Ripper or a Bernie Madoff, but you never know. If we catch this early, we have a chance. He doesn’t feel sympathy for others. He doesn’t recognize his inclusion in the human community. When he looks at people, he doesn’t smile. He just looks. We have promising treatments. Let’s move quickly…”

 

Of course, Doctor. Perhaps you could melt a few of his brain connections and banish his unsympathetic aura.

 

Jon Rappoport

An investigative reporter for the past 30 years, Jon is the author of a new wide-ranging collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

ELITE MATRIX PROPAGANDA

 

ELITE MATRIX POWER

 

MARCH 22, 2012. Propaganda is a strange animal, because it often capitalizes on the genuine motives of people who, unknowingly, are being used to promote an agenda they can’t fathom or see.

 

For example, the idea of helping others who are in desperate straits—what could be wrong with that? And if they live thousands of miles away, and we are suddenly connected to them via the internet, via Facebook, via cell phones, doesn’t this constitute a new global community that can achieve great aims?

 

I’m not here to impugn people who want to help. But I am here to point out that ever since the notion of the Global Village took hold, we have seen a number of campaigns for Togetherness and Oneness that were designed or used to advance Globalism itself.

 

Globalism—a system under which national borders and sovereign nations will be eradicated, under which banks, multinational corporations, and elite organizations like the Trilateral Commission will set up a management-structure to run the planet, control and allocate its resources, and reap gargantuan profits—while diminishing the destroying the quality of life for more and more of the population.

 

Co-opting people and groups who may have noble motives is a strategy as old as the hills.

 

I could spend the next five years trying to lay out all the propaganda efforts that are in progress to “centralize the management of planet Earth.”

 

Consider just one: utilizing celebrities who, in various ways, try to forward the concept that the human race is “one big family.” Whatever you may think of this “family” idea, the point is, far above the level of celebrities, the message becomes something quite different: nations are evil; borders are evil; everyone has to share equally in everything; individual achievement is nothing; the group is All; the only way to secure justice is to put power into the hands of experts who can rationally distribute the goods and services of the world from a central planning authority; “we” are all together, but “we” are subjects of technocratic planners who will ensure that love and tolerance and diversity are translated into dispensing the essentials of survival as THEY see fit.

 

And of course, “the planners” are somehow, in some spiritual sense, supposed to be a reflection of our own noble aims.

 

If you like that fantasy, I have condos on Jupiter for sale at slashed prices.

 

Here is a backgrounder on one of the elite groups that is consolidating power to position the world in its orbit.

 

ELITE MATRIX CONTROLLER

THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION

ITS ORIGINAL STATED GOAL: TO CREATE “A NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER”

Many people think the Trilateral Commission, created in 1973 by David Rockefeller to shape a new world, is now dead, a relic of an older time.

Think again.

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, brings us up to date at the August Forecast Review. There are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed ELEVEN of them to posts in his administration.

They include:

Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;

James Jones, National Security Advisor;

Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;

Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In Europe, the financially embattled nations of Greece and Italy have brought in Lucas Papademos and Mario Monti as prime ministers. Both men are Trilateral members, and Monti is the former European chairman of the Trilateral Commission.

In the US, since 1973, Wood counts eight out of 10 US Trade Representative appointments, and six out of eight World Bank presidencies, as American Trilateral members.

The Trilateral Commission, as is clear from members’ writings, aims to erase sovereign nations and establish a corporate-banking-government complex that runs the planet.

Four years before birthing the Commission with his godfather, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Several other noteworthy Trilateral members: George HW Bush; Bill Clinton; Dick Cheney.

Through the years since the Trilateral Commission was founded, major corporate interests have been invited in, via their handpicked representatives. A few: IBM; Archer Daniels Midland; JP Morgan Chase; Goldman Sachs; GE; Citigroup; B of A; Halliburton.

Wood contends that the Trilateral goal to remake the world’s economic order has been shoved forward in several key ways: dramatically increase US government debt; create a growing negative imbalance of US imports to exports; sell off large American corporations to foreign interests; outsource US jobs; but at the same time, greatly increase multinational corporate profits.

Obviously, in this scenario, torpedoing the US is a first-rank objective, since the American people are the strongest holdout against a globalist takeover.

Here, now, is a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment, from out of the past, to illustrate Trilateral power.

It’s through the Looking-Glass—a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took place in 1978. It concerned the issue of who, exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such [Trilateral] coordination [of governments’ policies].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others?After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches.

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

SOURCE: “Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management,” ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980. South End Press, Boston. Pages 192-3.

Although Kaiser and Cooper claimed everything being manipulated by the Trilateral Commission committee was already out in the open, it wasn’t.

Their interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was ignored and buried. Yet on the Richter Scale of scandals, it ranked far higher than, say, Watergate.

US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission had been been created in 1973 as an “informal discussion group” by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who would become Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor.

Shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security advisor, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

With this article as background…consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force.

Terms like “sharing” and “global family” and “together” and “diversity” are re-translated and used to elicit widespread support for what is actually the ongoing takeover.

If this leaves you feeling depressed, don’t be. The seeds of the real revolution are contained in the basic premise of Globalism, which is centralization. Clearly, the response is massive decentralization of power. Their vector runs one way; ours runs the opposite way.

I have covered these issues in many articles in my archive at www.nomorefakenews.com Eventually, decentralization gets back to your own power, your own imagination, your own commitment.

The amount of obfuscation laid like a blanket over individual power is enormous. It needs to be removed.

When free individuals form groups that do not encroach on or diminish their power, remarkable things can be done.

Recent history reveals we have come a long way down. But up is still there. It’s always there.

It never goes away.

Just as freedom never really goes away.

If you can even glimpse the tonnage of propaganda and coercion elites have deployed to saddle the individual, you can understand how resilient and resistant and enduring the individual must be—otherwise, why does it take so much effort to battle against him?

Jon Rappoport

An investigative reporter for 30 years, novelist, lecturer on imagination and individual creative power, Jon is the author of a new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED.

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

THE EDUCATION CONSPIRACY

 

EDUCATION AND THE DISMANTLING OF THE MIND:

 

WHEN THE SOLUTION IS WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM

 

by Jon Rappoport

 

MARCH 13, 2012. The state senate of Utah has just passed a bill that will allow public schools to opt out of providing sex education to children.

 

A counter-argument is being made that, although there was once a time when our country abounded in responsible two-parent families, that’s not the case anymore. Therefore, education about sex is lacking. Therefore, schools have to step into the breach and supply what is missing.

 

Otherwise, children won’t know about STDs, pregnancy, contraception, etc.

 

Over the last 40 years or so, school systems, under the aegis of government, have expanded their role. Using “duty” as the prow, these institutions have generated enormous programs to teach children what to think about everything from aluminum cans to bestiality.

 

Because it’s “right” and “important” and there is a “duty.”

 

Translation: outside groups with agendas worm their way into schools.

 

If I were obsessed with four-legged critters on the moon, and I had enough money and political clout and media/think-tank/foundation support, I could introduce Lunar Critterology as a vital subject into every public school in America.

 

If I were Bill Gates, I could push the need for computers in schools, despite the fact there is no credible evidence that computers improve literacy.

 

I went to school in the 1940s and 50s. At that time, the focus was simple. You learned to read, to write, and to do math. The textbooks were often old and worn. There were no visual aids. The lesson plans in every class were step-by-step. Learn a new thing, drill it to death, take a little quiz, learn the next new item, drill it, take a quiz.

 

It worked. It may have lacked glitz, but it worked because the vast majority of people can’t learn to read, write, or do math any other way.

 

You can’t gloss over these subjects with a broad brush and a lot of personality or caring. It’s all about digging in the dirt, one scoop at a time.

 

Some people would call it robotic education. I don’t think it is. It’s just doing what’s necessary—unless reading, writing, and math are deemed unimportant. In which case, you have a whole new idea about what education is.

 

If you spend time in the classroom on enterprises that are supposed to save the world or revolutionize society or build tolerance or cater to kids who don’t want to learn, then you take away hours from the core idea and practice of what learning is.

 

When I went to school, there could have been a better curriculum for history and science, but all in all, the teachers did a good job.

 

Now, we’re in a different world.

 

It’s assumed that most children are operating at a deficit, and they need to be brought up to speed on morals, on compassion, on sex, on greenness, on hope, on race and religion, on global concerns. At age five, eight, 12, 14.

 

And a great deal of this “new education” is about cashing in, for book publishers, for educrats, for federal overseers, for busybodies of all stripes who belong to agenda-driven groups that want their say and their moment in the sun.

 

I say this is all hogwash, and I believe anyone who consults national test scores and current levels of literacy would be compelled to agree.

 

Education is on the way out.

 

A few astute writers assert that, perhaps 80 years ago, the whole thrust of early education in America was altered intentionally, to produce worker-ants for a highly controlled society of the future. With all due respect, I think it’s worse than that. Because now we’re turning out kids who are essentially confused, badly schooled, drifting on the wind, lost in a mind-territory of fantasized entitlement. They aren’t androids ready to work on some non-existent assembly line. They’re just lost. They’re riddled with self-esteem that doesn’t work. They’re consumers looking for magic credit so they can buy their way into happiness. They’re loaded with sugar and other chemicals that scramble their synapses. They’re not only unsympathetic toward work, they have no passion of their own.

 

Logic? Imagination? Never heard of it.

 

When I went to school, there was virtually no classroom disruption of any kind. And my schools were attended by an economic, social, racial, and religious cross-section of students. We weren’t striving for diversity. We had it. The relatively few kids who were out of control and resisted any kind of discipline were herded into classes together, and teachers dealt with them.

 

The public schools of today lack the courage to say, “Look, if you’re here to learn, we want you. Otherwise, you’re out. Goodbye.”

 

If you need metal detectors at the school entrances, you went over the edge a long time ago. No one deserves to be subjected to that kind of environment.

 

The bullying problem? It’s an industry now. People with degrees write papers and books about it, and task forces gear up to study it and make recommendations. It’s a structure of carbuncles on the body-politic of education.

 

Once upon a time, no bully was allowed to attend school. If he pressed his attitude and his actions, he was expelled. Period. It wasn’t a question of why he bullied. He was gone. Learning couldn’t take place as long as he was on the scene.

 

And “gangs in schools?” I’m sorry, but there are no gangs in schools. There are schools in gangs—that’s what you have when groups of kids with violent tendencies inhabit classrooms and corridors. If you can’t expel them en masse, give up. Shut down the place.

 

If you want to make schools into six-hour-a-day baby-sitting machines, call it that. Try to obtain public funding for it. Hire guards and nurses and cops to staff it. Put it behind barbed-wire fences and install those metal detectors.

 

Or if schools are really lunch cafeterias, run them that way. Free public lunches. Have kids show up at noon, eat, and leave.

 

If you think kids of various religions should be allowed to commandeer a room to hold prayer groups, call it Government-Funded God. Rent a hall somewhere and schedule everybody from Christians and Jews to Muslims and Buddhists and Hindus and Zoroastrians.

 

Well, we have these kids who are great football players, and they score very badly on all the tests, but we need them on the team.”

 

No you don’t. Start your own community team. Make up a name. Raise money for uniforms and coaches. Form a league. If these kids want to stay in school—which is a completely different matter—they’ll have to learn how to attain grades for real.

 

And this long-standing rule about passing kids on to the next grade, no matter how poorly they perform? Graduating them from high school even if they can’t read at fourth-grade level? Because they need to feel good about themselves? Because that’ll somehow help them wend their way through life later on?

 

Invent a new type of school for them and put it somewhere else. Bring in tutors. If that fails after an honest attempt, teach trades. Some of these kids will end up making more money in a trade than Harvard business-school grads.

 

All of the above, by the way, makes a good case for home schooling. Unless the parents themselves were shot out the top end of their schools, long ago, ill-prepared to handle reading, writing, and arithmetic.

 

No, the problem isn’t cookie-cutter education. It’s no education.

 

Now, of course, hovering over this revolution in education is the wider government becoming mommy and daddy to everyone. “Because they care.” Because they need to do this “caring” in order to obtain budget money for their departments. Because otherwise they would be useless.

 

And hovering over THAT is the program to convert everyone on the planet to a status much like an eternal patient with an eternal doctor.

 

This program is advancing based on the notion that “patient status” equals “more controllable.”

 

Yes, we have to control you for your own good, because we care.”

 

No, they want control because they want control.

 

In my day, the subject that was conspicuously missing from the classroom was Logic. Once upon a time, it had been taught to children when their reading skills had progressed far enough. It was usually presented as a series of fallacies that infected the process of reasoning.

 

A few years ago, I decided to write a logic course to fill this gap. My strategy was to provide basic background lessons and then launch into a series of text passages seeded with fallacies and flaws. Students with the help of their teachers would find them and understand how they operated to derail lucid thinking.

 

I offered this 18-lesson course to home schoolers, and adults who wanted to use it for self-study.

 

[Now it’s part of my new collection, The Matrix Revealed. See the Matrix banner on my home page at www.nomorefakenews.com]

 

Twenty-four hundred years ago, in Athens, logic was, for the first time, explained in detail by Aristotle. It marked the beginning of a new era for humankind. Logic allowed a person to peruse a formal argument, differentiate between premises and deductions, and judge the validity of the reasoning process.

 

When students are taught this subject well, they turn into detectives. They realize that articles and books are more than mere lakes of information. They can trace the progress of a line of thought, and see that authors are offering evidence that leads to a conclusion.

 

It’s an awakening. I’ve seen it resolve what was foolishly diagnosed as ADHD. The student becomes grounded. He accrues real confidence. He can decide whether an argument is valid or invalid. He can spot flaws and describe them.

 

Armed with the tool of logic, he becomes independent.

 

This may explain why logic was dropped out of the secondary school curriculum.

 

God forbid the educational system should be turning out thousands of students who can really think for themselves, and think powerfully and consistently.

 

Note: I’m not covering the subject of college education in this piece, but I have an interesting anecdote for you. William E. Kennick taught philosophy at Amherst from 1956 to 1993. Amherst has consistently been rated as one of the top colleges in America. During his tenure, Kennick grew disturbed by the quality of papers his students were turning in. So he wrote and distributed a four-and-a-half page, single-spaced document titled, Some Rules for Writing Presentable English. The cream of the cream of American college students needed that on-the-fly tutorial to come up to basic speed. What other students at other colleges were/are producing in the way of written English is too horrible to contemplate.

 

So now we come to the central thesis. The modern vision of education, aside from the hard sciences, is all about unhinging or un-gluing the mind from its moorings, from its focus, from its ability to track complex thought.

 

Instead, we have education as: socialization; community; relativity.

 

This last factor is key. No particular piece of information is any more “valid” than any other piece, no more important, no more deserving of respect. Information is a soup into which one dips a spoon—coming up with whatever is there.

 

Over the range of society, you get young people wandering around with barely a clue. They’re dissatisfied, they’re upset, they’re resentful, they’re mystified, they’re rebellious.

 

To a degree, that describes every generation. But when the legs are missing, when the ability to concentrate and focus is absent, when the reasoning capacity is vastly underdeveloped, you get a stupendous crash.

 

It’s worse than cookie-cutter graduates heading for an assembly line. It’s the kind of trouble that spreads out in ripples, requiring assistance from the State. And that is the revelation.

 

That’s the society that’s being created.

 

For the elites who want to run things, globally, it’s not enough to gather up the most dependent people in a net and bring them over to the collectivist side with promises. No, what’s needed is a machine that PRODUCES huge numbers of newly minted dependents all the time.

 

Welcome to the educational wing of globalism.

 

Scour every textbook you can find at any level in the school system of your country. See if you can find the conjunction of the word “powerful” with the word “individual” where the implication isn’t pejorative. Where the thrust is positive. I know where my money is in that bet.

 

When political and economic collectivism is the goal of a society, certain things have to be done with the school system. Individualism has to be discouraged and sidelined. Status based on pure merit, achievement, and performance has to be minimized. And the core courses must lose their discipline.

 

Instead, group socialization, random expression of students’ opinions (based on nothing in particular), and bogus self-esteem must take center stage.

 

As a former teacher, I can tell you it’s rather easy to make this momentous shift. The starting point, from which the whole campaign unfolds, involves grouping together students in classes who are operating at significantly different levels of skill and ability.

 

For example, try teaching geometry to 20 kids who scored across a wide spectrum in their previous final exams in elementary algebra. Just try. Follow your day-to-day lesson plans and see what happens. It’s like crossing a bridge with drivers who never learned the difference between the brake and gas pedal. Chaos.

 

Jammed up in that baffling disorder, teachers will tend to gravitate to social concerns. They’ll encourage, wheedle, praise, empathize. They’ll try to draw out “the feelings” of students. What was once a very straightforward proposition will vaporize.

 

The pernicious effects of elementary-school teachers having failed to impart the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic will explode in a tsunami by the first year of high school.

 

And what happened in the first place, in grades 1-5? The model of repetition, in which each new concept in a subject is drilled over and over, and tested, before moving on to the next concept, was abandoned.

 

When I was a child, in the 1940s, the model of repetition was intact. It was brick and mortar.

 

But somewhere along the line, the “person-centered psychology” of education was invented. Every child automatically became “special.” On the surface, this sounded good. It sounded like enlightenment.

 

But it was really a piece of psy-war. It glossed over the fact that, if each child is innately special, he/she doesn’t have to be informed of it over and over. He only has to be taught well and learn well. More than enough encouragement begins to confuse a child and make him impatient. He wants to get on with things. He wants to prove he can excel. He wants new knowledge.

 

The history of mainstream psychology can be boiled down to two movements. First, there were the experiments of Pavlov. Conditioned reflex. The human as machine. Then there was the therapeutic age. Endless muddled rumination on problems and difficulties, and the need for “re-enforcement.” Everyone is special. The child as beloved pet.

 

The arc went from robot to dependent. They were both gross failures.

 

When pet/dependent became the order of the day, psychiatrists proliferated their invention of mental disorders. ADD. ADHD. Oppositional Defiance Disorder. Clinical depression. Bipolar. And powerful toxic drugs came down the line, to scramble brains.

 

This is the real war on drugs, except the war is being fought against children by “mental-health professionals.”

 

Suddenly, childhood diseases which had been accepted for generations, which came and went and gave children stronger immune systems in the process, were claimed to be a horrific threat, and 20 or 30 vaccines had to be taken to prevent these illnesses. (I have covered the ineffectiveness and dangers of vaccines elsewhere, most notably in my 10-hour audio seminar, VACCINES, ARMED AND DANGEROUS.)

 

Thus the shaping of a new and false and debilitating image of the child torpedoed children and their education.

 

Creating The Disabled is the cornerstone of Collectivism.

 

I need you. You need me. Everybody needs everybody. Whatever germs of truth lie in this ideal are crushed, because the “need” formula is artificially built. It’s a piece of debased architecture, whose real purpose is the inculcation of a reason to abandon self and individual power.

 

Once, the Carnegie and Rockefeller line of force viewed education as the assembly line for turning out objects that would produce other objects in mindless fashion. But that has changed. Now schools are built to become need-factories, breeding surreal socialized graduates who contemplate how political power has wronged them.

 

The new sign of intelligence is this: how many ways can you imagine you’ve been cheated?

 

And here is the kicker. Surprisingly little of this contemplation reveals the actual methods of manipulation.

 

But then, why would it? If children are engineered long enough, they’ll look everywhere for answers except at their hidden masters, the ones whose objective was to make them into children forever.

 

Jon Rappoport

Jon is the author of the new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, and, with Robert Scott Bell, a 10-hour audio seminar, VACCINES: ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

Jon Rappoport has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize early in his career, Jon has published articles on medical fraud, and politics in LA Weekly, CBS Healthwatch, Spin, Stern, and other magazines and newspapers in the US and Europe.

 

www.nomorefakenews.com

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

Cartels That Run The World

Cartels That Run The World

by Jon Rappoport

February 8, 2012

The following information comes from insider interviews with Ellis Medavoy and Richard Bell, two people I interview extensively in my new product, THE MATRIX REVEALED. This is just a brief taste of what they have to say…

Major institutions on this planet that control Military, Money, Energy, Government, Medical, Corporate, Media, and Education are becoming, more and more, global cartels, horizontally integrated across national borders.

This is more than a top-down command process. It’s organically evolving. Three steps forward, two steps back. There is a great deal of competition among the components of a given cartel, but there is also cooperation. And in the long run, the see-saw is tipping in the direction of cooperation, as these entities realize they may well have more to gain that way.

I can’t stress too strongly this EVOLVING process. All attempts to merely assume twelve men in a room run the planet fall woefully short.

Instead, over time, people who lead a powerful institution (like Energy, for example) look out and recognize more major players, and in this recognition there is an impulse to compete and win and destroy, but there is also an impulse to build commonality and therefore monopolize the entire territory.

During one conversation with retired master propagandist Ellis Medavoy, I asked him about the extent of mutual cooperation in his given field, psychological warfare. He responded:

“Twenty years ago, I would have said we were all operating separately and jealously. Each of us was mining his own contacts and building his false pictures of reality for the masses. But then things began to change. Globally. First of all, more of us were pushing the same holograms. And because communication and travel were speeding up so rapidly, we were working a lot of the same venues. We would run into each other more often. We began to share information. I mean, it was cautious. We weren’t gushing with unbridled love, I assure you. The competitive factor was still strong. And we had fights. But through all that, we began to see through the fog, so to speak. We began to understand the effectiveness of cooperating. We would test each other with privileged information, to see if we could trust each other to keep it private. A tidbit here, a tidbit there.

“And you see, behind us, other groups were finding commonality, too. For example, in the area of medical propaganda, where I operated a lot of the time. And these groups saw they could join together for specific operations, on an international scale. They could push enormous lies globally, and everyone of their class would profit and gain wider control. So I would find myself working with a psy warfare guy from, say, France, or Germany in a joint venture. We would rub elbows. We’d be feeding from the same basic money trough.

“We’d both be briefed by a team of intelligence experts, and those experts would be of several nationalities. Slowly, I saw a new kind of umbrella structure emerging.

“See, suppose during the secret lead-up to a planned economic crisis [money cartel], you can distract everybody with a phony epidemic [medical cartel]. Do you see? Leaders perceive a reason to cooperate. Planners become more intelligent and clever. They reach across lines they never would have reached across before…

“You begin to see the outlines of a much more inclusive future structure. This is multi-front warfare.”

Richard Bell, another former insider, said to me: “People like to assume that money is everything. If you can limit the amount of money the public has, eventually they weaken and cave in and they’re easier to control. And this is certainly true. But on the other hand, as mega-corporations gain more power and range and markets, you have a clash, because those corporations, which are now cooperating in ways they never have, as a cartel in some respects, want customers for their products. They don’t want abject poverty across the board. People have to be able to buy their products.

“So there is a heavy conflict. It’s a conflict between elite bankers [money cartel] and mega-corporations [corporation cartel]. It needs to be resolved through advance planning, over the long term. So now you have these powerful men sitting down and talking in a new way. Other big-time players get involved, too [government, media, energy cartels, for example].”

This is just the beginning of what these people have to say about the Matrix in their interviews and how it REALLY works.

To order THE MATRIX REVEALED, click here

To learn even more about what is inside THE MATRIX REVEALED product click here.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Folding up The Matrix

Folding up The Matrix

by Jon Rappoport

February 4, 2012

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Orders for my new product, THE MATRIX REVEALED, are pouring in. Thank you.

I want to write a few words about the underlying impulses for doing this extensive collection of material.

First of all: THIS IS A PLANET OF HYPNOTIZED ARTISTS.

That’s the key. That’s the “secret.”

And the hypnotic state IS the Matrix.

It takes an enormous amount (and variety) of inducement to bring on and maintain the trance.

In one way or another, since I started this site in the year 2000, I’ve been hammering and chiseling at the trance and exposing the methods used to keep the hypnotic state intact.

WE ARE A PLANET OF HYPNOTIZED CREATORS.

The purpose of the trance is twofold:

to keep us from realizing the shapes and dimensions and existence of the mesmerized state;

and even if we see all of that, to keep us from stepping out and creating the new realities we most profoundly desire.

Ultimately, all hypnosis is about putting a damper on individual creative imagination and power.

When successfully hypnotized, people tend to become mechanical in their actions and their excuses and their reasons for staying the same…AND ON TOP OF THAT, THEY ASSUME THEY KNOW EVERYTHING WORTH KNOWING.

This works for a while, and then decay sets in. Things begin to go downhill.

Essentially, what I’ve done with this site is set up a college that teaches what the Matrix is, how it operates, and how an individual can UN-MATRIX himself to a degree that is potentially astonishing.

I didn’t start out with that idea in the year 2000. I was still mainly working as an investigative reporter, and I was chasing stories that would connect me with answers to the question: WHO RUNS THE WORLD?

I was still feeling my way along many stories that related to the medical cartel and its repressive anti-human practices, deceptions, and motives. I didn’t let go of that, and I still haven’t because, as I’ve written before, this cartel is the most dangerous one on the planet, in the long run. It has the most prestige, certainly, and its leaders literally want to own the bodies and brains of every human on Earth.

As I moved into 2003, I began opening up another front. Some people call it Human Potential. I call it imagination, creative power, magic.

And I came to realize that there is an enormous amount of resistance to the positive assertion of that power ON THE PART OF INDIVIDUALS WHO OTHERWISE ARE QUITE INTELLIGENT AND PERCEPTIVE.

So I wasn’t just talking about what mind-control experts in many fields were doing to deceive and derail this power, although certainly that needs to be understood. I was also talking about what people DO TO THEMSELVES to keep a state of amnesia and hypnosis intact.

Later, in 2007-8, I went back and re-read all my interviews with Ellis Medavoy (retired master propagandist), Richard Bell (financial analyst), and Jack True (brilliant innovative hypnotherapist).

And I said, “Okay, this is all about the Matrix.” And so were the 10 or so hours of audio I had done myself on The Planetary Chessboard.

And so was my first book, AIDS INC.

And even later, when I re-read my newly released course, LOGIC AND ANALYSIS, I saw that this, too, was about the Matrix, because more and more people were unable to think straight and they were falling into various traps that were indicators of a kind of hypnotic CERTAINTY. Hypnotic states ARE a flattened-out version of certainty.

So I thought, why not put all this together in one place? Why not put all the interviews and the audio and the book and course into an easy downloadable format and release it that way?

That’s what I’ve done.


The Matrix Revealed


It attacks aspects of the Matrix from a number of points of view and exposes them and gives people techniques that vault forward to a level of freedom and power that is wide, high, and UN-HYPNOTIC.

The 1100 pages of text and ten hours of audio are exactly that.

My friend Catherine Fitts and I were talking the other day, and we came up with the phrase—REPROCESSING CENTER—to label many teachers and supposedly well-meaning pundits who try to “help you” get out of some portion of the Matrix…but really, they’re leading you in a circle right back into it. You get reprocessed. You don’t escape.

Well, I’m not interested in running a reprocessing center.

There is an archetype called ANDROID. And from that central place many branches bloom—many different illustrations of ANDROID. The archetype signifies that a person is flying that flag for himself. He imagines himself basically as a FUNCTIONAL entity with superficial desires for satisfaction and pleasure, and his greatest accomplishment would be attaining a higher level of skill and competence, within the Matrix, in fulfilling those desires and being accepted as a member of the group.

All this revolves around a self-hypnosis process. He can remain energetic, cheerful, alert, and dedicated while being, at a deeper level, in a trance.

His genetic predispositions operate, actually, as confirmations that, yes, he should put himself in that trance and play out the role of ANDROID in his life. In other words, if he invokes the trance for himself, he will succeed in that role. He’s got the right equipment.

These matters deeply impact how society moves forward. Add in various social constraints, the power of marketing, certain propaganda ops, the educational and organized-religion milieu, and you have a civilization that can be run through top-down control.

An ANDROID wants an excessive level of control to be imposed on him. He flourishes under that system. He finds his place. He accepts it. He knows the right slogans to repeat to himself like mantras. He knows to whom he owes loyalty and which side of his bread is buttered.

If he finds himself rebelling at some aspect of the system, he falls, every time, for an operator who will pretend to lead him to freedom but really is putting him back in restraints.

If the cultural trend is toward “sympathy and self-effacement,” he’ll follow along like a dog wagging his tail and display those characteristics, as if they are the apotheosis of “being a good person.” Yes, he’ll stage his own imitations of insight and fall into line. He’ll claim he’s changed and he’s “working on himself” to ascend to a better place.

More hypnosis.

As Catherine pointed out, if a horrific public event occurs, [the android] is convinced to focus on his own emotions and the hope of “healing,” rather than figuring out how and why the event really occurred, with the intent to fix the situation.

The degree of media/government/educational/medical propaganda floated to shape people’s attitudes is astonishing.

I have much more to say about these matters—and it’s all in the Matrix product. The interviews with insiders who have helped put together the nuts and bolts of the Matrix give you an extensive view.

To order THE MATRIX REVEALED, click here, or, click on THE MATRIX REVEALED box on my home page at www.nomorefakenews.com

To learn even more about what is inside THE MATRIX REVEALED product click here.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

MORE ON THE MATRIX REVEALED

 

JACK TRUE REVELATIONS

 

JANUARY 31, 2012. The first day of responses, after yesterday’s launch of my new mega-info product, THE MATRIX REVEALED, has been gratifying. Orders are coming in.

 

For over a year, people have been emailing me about my 18-lesson logic course, LOGIC AND ANALYSIS, and now that whole course is part of the MATRIX product. The course, including the teacher’s manual, lesson plans, and student materials, was selling for $375. It is now just one element of the overall MATRIX product, which sells for far less.

 

In the new product, there are 43 interviews with Jack True. 320 pages. That’s another element. If there was any person worth talking to in depth about the Matrix and how to understand it, it was Jack.

 

He was certainly the most innovative hypnotherapist who ever lived. He took all that experience with his clients and made enormous breakthroughs in un-hypnotizing people at very deep levels.

 

Jack was determined to find ways to show people how their own approach to reality was merging with the Matrix. He never tired of explaining his insights based on clinical experience.

 

Jack once told me a person had to be stimulated to pry open his own passive inclinations, in order to discover hidden energies and power. He was all about providing that stimulation, in the form of innovative and sometimes shocking ideas about reality and perception.

 

These 43 interviews are priceless explorations of frontiers of consciousness.

 

One night at dinner, Jack said, “If you take any fixation a person has, you are looking at a funeral ceremony for his own creative power. Suppose he’s fixated on money. Dig far enough into that, and you’ll find a brilliant artist who has innovative ideas about making money. It seems impossible, but it’s there. I’ve seen it many times. But you have to open up the whole area, not just a little bit. What you end up with is the blueprint for the formation of a problem. Where does a problem come from? It comes from deciding that your own creative approach to something is too radical. Then you try ‘the normal way’, and that doesn’t work for you. So it’s a problem now. You try to solve the problem and wrestle it to the ground. You can’t. You become fixated on the problem. That’s what happens to people. And to put the cherry on the cake, these people tell you they’re not creative. You can meditate for a thousand years and you won’t solve that. So we come to the question: why do people give up on their own creative power? That’s been the core of my practice for a long time. Unraveling that has been my life’s work.”

 

It was very good work. It was brilliant work. It was unparalleled work.

 

In my new product, THE MATRIX REVEALED, you get 43 shots with Jack. 43 interviews. 320 pages.

 

And that’s just a fraction of the overall text, which runs to 1100 pages. Then there are 10-plus hours of audio from me about the Planetary Chessboard, the Matrix, and what amounts to psychological operations aimed at populations and individuals.

 

You get the full text of AIDS INC., my first book, which Jack shepherded into a publishing deal for me. It takes apart the medical-research complex at a level most people never investigate: the most hidden lies; how they are built; how they are told; how they are sold; how they are fused into an anti-logical whole. Step by step.

 

My interviews with Ellis Medavoy, retired propaganda expert, and Richard Bell, financial rebel, provide you with striking and startling insights into other key aspects of the Matrix.

 

THE MATRIX REVEALED represents about half of my work over the past ten years. You could say it’s why I left the field of conventional investigative journalism. There were questions that needed to be answered. Big questions. And I refused to shy away from them.

 

To order THE MATRIX REVEALED, click here, or, click on THE MATRIX REVEALED box on my home page at www.nomorefakenews.com

 

To learn even more about what is inside THE MATRIX REVEALED product click here.

 

Jon Rappoport

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

JON’S NEW BIG LAUNCH

 

JANUARY 30, 2012. WELL, FOLKS, HERE IT IS. THE PRODUCT MANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN ASKING ME TO PUT TOGETHER FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS.

 

FINALLY.

 

A HUGE COLLECTION OF MY OLD NEWSLETTER INTERVIEWS ON THE MATRIX AND WHO RUNS THE WORLD AND HOW.

 

BUT THAT’S JUST THE BEGINNING.

 

Because, for example, my full LOGIC COURSE is also included!

 

Read on for all the details.

 

To order THE MATRIX REVEALED, click here, or, click on THE MATRIX REVEALED box on my home page at www.nomorefakenews.com

 

Thanks, Theodore and Greg. You did great work putting it all together!

 

Jon

 

INTRODUCTION TO THE MATRIX REVEALED

 

by Jon Rappoport

Copyright © 2012 by Jon Rappoport

 

Let me start with the nuts and bolts of this product. It is enormous in scope and size.

 

250 megabytes of information.

 

Over 1100 pages of text.

 

Ten and a half hours of audio.

 

The 2 bonuses alone are rather extraordinary:

 

My complete 18-lesson course, LOGIC AND ANALYSIS, which includes the teacher’s manual and a CD to guide you. I was previously selling the course for $375. This is a new way to teach logic, the subject that has been missing from schools for decades.

 

The complete text (331 pages) of AIDS INC., the book that exposed a conspiracy of scientific fraud deep within the medical research establishment. The book has become a sought-after item, since its publication in 1988. It contains material about viruses, medical testing, and the invention of disease that is, now and in the future, vital to our understanding of phony epidemics arising in our midst. I assure you, the revelations in the book will surprise you; they cut much deeper and are more subtle than “virus made in a lab” scenarios.

 

The heart and soul of this product are the text interviews I conducted with Matrix-insiders, who have first-hand knowledge of how the major illusions of our world are put together:

 

EILLIS MEDAVOY, master of PR, propaganda, and deception, who worked for key controllers in the medical and political arenas. 28 interviews, 290 pages.

 

RICHARD BELL, financial analyst and trader, whose profound grasp of market manipulation and economic-rigging is formidable, to say the least. 16 interviews, 132 pages.

 

JACK TRUE, the most creative hypnotherapist on the face of the planet. Jack’s anti-Matrix understanding of the mind and how to liberate it is unparalleled. His insights are unique, staggering. 43 interviews, 320 pages.

 

Then there are several more interviews with brilliant analysts of the Matrix, including recent conversations. 53 pages.

 

The ten and a half hours of mp3 audio are my solo presentation, based on these interviews and my own research. Title: The Multi-Dimensional Planetary Chessboard—The Matrix Vs. the Un-Conditioning of the Individual.

 

Here is some background on the product and my own history:

 

In 2001, I essentially left a career as an investigative reporter and rolled the dice on the emerging internet. I started a site called www.nomorefakenews.com

 

I didn’t stop investigating and publishing, but my field of operation widened. My first big question was: WHO REALLY RUNS THE WORLD?

 

And my second was: WHOEVER THEY ARE, HOW DO THEY MANUFACTURE REALITY FOR THE POPULATION OF EARTH?

 

I was prepared to deal with these enormous questions, because I had contacts. These were people I had come to know well during my days as a reporter, writing for LA Weekly and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe—and also during a stint on radio at KPFK in Los Angeles.

 

These people, these contacts, were insiders.

 

They had deep knowledge in their fields:

 

PROPAGANDA; FINANCE; HYPNOTISM; MIND CONTROL; MEDICINE; INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS…

 

There was a catch. They were unwilling to be cited as on-the-record sources in my articles. They knew they would suffer consequences if they went public.

 

Once I started my website, I did extensive research to confirm the credentials of my insiders. I wanted to make sure they were who they said they were. I wanted to verify they had worked where they said they had worked. This was a laborious process.

 

When I was sure, I began to interview them.

 

I wasn’t certain where all this would go.

 

Gradually, I realized I was getting VERY high-level information on The Matrix. But this was the real Matrix.

 

As one of my sources described it:

 

Imagine a factory that turns out illusions. And these illusions are woven together to make up what we think the world is.”

 

The actual Matrix involves a number of areas: government; money; energy; the military; intelligence agencies; medicine; mega-corporations; psychology and mind control; science…

 

I started a members-only newsletter, and word quickly spread. Every Friday, I would email a newsletter to subscribers. Many of these newsletters were interviews with my insiders.

 

It was quite a job, keeping up with writing (public) daily articles for my site and also putting out the (private) newsletter. I was also collating the high-level information from my sources and making maps of the expanding territory.

 

I saw that I was looking at global CARTELS. As you will discover in reading this material, these cartels are not frozen organizations. They are evolving.

 

So now I’ve had some very competent assistance, and I’ve assembled the most important newsletter-interviews for you.

 

But in addition to that, I’m publishing, for the first time, interviews that never made it into those newsletters. And I’m presenting interviews from very recent days as well.

 

It’s very instructive to talk to people who have been there onthe inside. They are bright, they are informative, they convey the depth of situations they were involved with. They go beyond relaying dry facts, and in doing so, you learn how elite players play the game. You receive a rounded and three-dimensional picture of: the process of constructing The Matrix. How it’s built.

 

In every case, each insider was relieved to be able to talk with utter frankness, with no fear that his words would be twisted or taken out of context or deleted. So you’re getting the full story.

 

I met my first two insiders while I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., SCANDAL OF THE CENTURY, in 1987-88. The book was my initial experience in putting together a vast amount of data—which contradicted every official position on a supposedly rock-hard subject: medical science.

 

At the time, I didn’t really understand how deep I was drilling down into a cardinal aspect of The Matrix. I only knew I was I digging up and exposing long-held delusions broadcast as facts by the Medical Cartel. These false realities went far beyond the subject of AIDS.

 

That first book of mine started as a pure lark. I had just published a piece in LA Weekly about certain televangelists and their support of an intentionallystaged Armageddon in Israel. When the piece was published, I sat back and thought, “Where do I go from here? What could be weirder than this?”

 

Like other investigative reporters, I was excited by strange and bizarre stories that could blow readers’ minds. I was motivated by that.

 

So, in 1987, I wondered what could be stranger than the Armageddon story I had just done.

 

Sitting in my Los Angeles studio, a thought popped into my head. “AIDS. I bet there’s something about that whole thing that’s pretty weird.”

 

Little did I know…

 

That was my first big leap.

 

I had studied logic extensively in college. I had been taught by a philosophy professor who was a very generous soul and a relentless thinker. If you were an inch from accuracy, he would point it out, and he would give you the full reason and understanding that pulled you back to the straight and narrow.

 

Once I dove into research for AIDS INC., I was amazed at the sloppy thinking and contradiction that was posing as science.

 

And then I met my first two insiders.

 

Their basic message to me was: keep going; you’re on the right track; we have a great deal more to share with you.

 

They weren’t just talking about medical issues.

 

They were talking about the whole construction of reality from a number of angles.

 

Each of the insiders I have gotten to know over the subsequent years has a different personal story. They have all left their particular corner of The Matrix-Construction Group. Jack True, my late friend and colleague, was a different man altogether. He was never part of that Group. He was the most informed and brilliant researcher I’ve ever come across on the subject of the mind—the essential link that makes The Matrix work.

 

Jack started the ball rolling. He was instrumental in making the deal that got AIDS INC published. He introduced me to a few key figures along the way—insiders who proved invaluable.

 

Why did these insiders want to talk and spill secrets? Well, the process of interviewing them wasn’t always easy. They could be thorny at times. But they all had seen, finally, the abyss toward which they were heading, toward which they were leading the population. And they pulled back.

 

So…

 

This Volume is for individuals.

 

Because:

 

Beyond The Matrix is true individual power.

 

Despite all the illusions, it has always been there.

 

It waits for you.

 

And it IS your power.

 

To order THE MATRIX REVEALED, click here, or, click on THE MATRIX REVEALED box on my home page at www.nomorefakenews.com

 

Jon Rappoport

2012

qjrconsulting@gmail.com

Part 5, What is The Matrix?

Part 5, What is The Matrix?

by Jon Rappoport

July 6, 2011

From one point of view, the Matrix is a central block of energy that is fed by millions of loops and tubes of energy—and those loops are all human actions that follow a script called:

THE HUMAN CONDITION.

“The human condition” is a fake image of the limitations of human life, plus all the implications and melodramas that follow from it.

You can imagine it as one vast bureaucracy, in which the workers are grossly unhappy with what is going on and yet love every misstep, mistake, postponement, crisis, and grinding routine.

It’s a culture. To one degree or another, it pervades every area of life.

As long as limitation is the overriding principle, the human-condition drama is going to play over and over again. The faces and names will change, but the production will go on.

Limitation has to do with: obscuring the existence, range, and power of imagination. Limitation is ultimately based on the PRETENSE THAT IMAGINATION IS AN UNIMPORTANT FACULTY.

Once you accept that pretense, life as we know it and the “human condition” follow as night follows day.

The “human condition” and its implications are really coming into their own now—they are being promoted as the reason we must have “share-and-care”global governance that continues to advance its agenda. Which includes cradle to grave medical status as a patient with constant need for treatment.

Global governance resonates closely with the Matrix.

The US Constitution was written for an agrarian society of about six million people who were living in a relatively small area along the east coast of the continent.

Thomas Jefferson’s view was that each generation, every 20 years or so, should write their own Constitution. This is a rather staggering point, ignored by most so-called conservatives.

Jefferson also believed a Republic would succeed only if the population was rather small.

So, for example, we might now have 50 or 60 separate Republics on this continent—each one writing a new Constitution every 20 years.

If that were the case, the present national government in Washington DC would be a thing of the past. Gone.

The 50 or 60 Republics would hopefully maintain good relations with one another, and one assumes Bill of Rights provisions would be part of each Republic’s basic law.

Decentralized government.

I would favor at least 200 Republics on this continent.

That way, citizen participation in government would actually mean something.

One Republic, so-called, with a population of 330,000,000 people, trying to fulfill The General Good of All, is going to fail progressively and spectacularly. The taxation rate alone is a disaster. Further, the attitude of the central government is going to be shaped by people who think in terms of 330 million people—planners, problem solvers, bureaucrats and administrators. And this tendency is going to slant action in the direction of attending to the masses, as units or groupings, rather than as individuals. It’s a self-defeating proposition.

I believe a man like Alexander Hamilton, however, saw this future and did not flinch from it, because in his eyes “the people” were doomed from the beginning by their nature and character. They had to be ruled from above.

It was Jefferson who was more optimistic about the potential of the individual.

In our world today, we are seeing big governments getting bigger—as a strategy for solving their unsolvable problems. The venality and greed and duplicity of political leaders are all about extending top-down control. It’s not just a plan, it’s what happens when the nation is so large, because the people who naturally gravitate to “serve” have this predilection for power/control.

The weave of the reality-Matrix and big government harmonize. They both exist to make people passive receptors.

“I’m basically John Jones living in the Untied States in 2011. I’m trying to get ahead. I’m encountering problems and trying to solve them. I’m looking out on the world from this point of view. I have no reservoir of inherent power. I’m striving. I’m doing the best I can…”

This is the shrunken attitude of a member of Matrix reality.

It is fostered by a minimized and restricted sense of possibility.

And THAT naturally seeps in when imagination is not the prime piece of the equation.

Imagination not only conceives of extended possibility, it projects it into space and time AND BEYOND.

When imagination swings into operation, physical reality is more an occasion for creating new realities, rather than a definer of reality.

The difference is crucial.

In 1932, Henri Bergson wrote, “The universe is a machine for creating gods.”

The Matrix plus John Jones is a collaboration that brings gods into being, the result of which is passivity.

As I’ve written before, the universe (Matrix) is one work of art among a potentially infinite number of works of art. The idea of exploring one work of art to the point of obsession, to the point of forgetting all the other potential works of art and the “means of their production” (imagination) is the sine qua non of the Matrix.

Imagination exceeds the space-time continuum.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

Part 4, What is The Matrix?

Part 4, What is The Matrix?

The Easy Way Out.

by Jon Rappoport

July 5, 2011

Point one: The basic fact to remember about the first Matrix film was that a hero had to be chosen. ONE MAN. A person who would function beyond the rules of the space-time continuum.

Not a group. Not a committee.

Real power would accrue to an individual.

Point two: in real life, the reason the real Matrix endures is that there is an audience for it.

And audience is fascinated by, and glued to, STORY.

There are certain kinds of stories that are particularly effective at maintaining audience in a state of being audience.

For example, the hero is faced with a problem which turns into a mystery, and he then penetrates the mystery after much work and danger—during which time his friends lose faith in him—and finally the hero does away with the villain at the heart of the mystery…

WHATEVER KEEPS AUDIENCE BEING ONLY AUDIENCE KEEPS THE MATRIX IN PLACE.

For the most part, audience wants to remain being audience, and it will search for and rationalize ways to do just that.

Religion can be an excellent way to remain being audience on a cosmic scale.

The power to exit from being audience is real and significant. Without it, you stay in the Matrix.

Story has beginning, middle, and end. This pattern, so obvious and universal, is rarely thought about, but it creates a trance. Try writing a story without that sequence and see how many people want it.

“I’m audience, and I want beginning, middle, and end, over and over.”

Part of being audience is experiencing the letdown that happens after the story ends. This depression stimulates the need for another story. And on and on it goes. But the letdown, at a deeper level, is really about a dissatisfaction with the WHOLE PATTERN of story—people want to break out of that. They want to conquer that addiction.

And how is that done?

Well, the first step is being able to invent a story of your own.

And this is where people balk.

I recently received an email from a reader who expressed, in a vague way, his dissatisfaction with “my story.” As if he had been looking for a “master story teller”—which was an idea in HIS own mind—and since I didn’t fulfill that ideal, he was unhappy.

This was a perfect illustration of what I’m talking about. He wanted to remain being audience, and he was looking to me to supply material for his trance.

BEING AND REMAINING AUDIENCE magnetizes people to Matrix.

At a conference, I once gave a talk about freedom. In the middle of the talk, I told the audience we were going to do a few exercises that would possibly enhance their sense of freedom. The very notion that I was asking them to DO something, to come out of their audience-trance…which they hadn’t expected, caused a stir, a sense of apprehension. They were programmed for beginning, middle, and end—and I was suddenly shredding that.

They had planned on being entertained with the notion of freedom.

After the lecture, a friend of mine came up to me and said, “Did you catch what happened there, when you told them you were going to have them do exercises?”

“Sure,” I said. “That was on purpose.”

THE MATRIX EXISTS BECAUSE THERE IS AUDIENCE FOR IT.

On the level of mind, Matrix IS whatever keeps audience being audience.

Consciously or unconsciously, every salesman knows this.

I knew a quite successful salesman who revealed his secret to me. If he had told this secret to a psychiatrist, he would have been diagnosed as bipolar or schizoid in two seconds.

He said he knew he had been a salesman in many past lives, and therefore he knew exactly how to act and speak “in the role” of Salesman. If he followed the role exactly, his prospects would buy whatever he was selling. If he didn’t, they wouldn’t. There was a beginning, middle, and end to his pitch.

He had the knack of keeping his audience in a state of being audience. In a trance. And part of the trance was signing the check and the contract. It was a piece of cake.

AUDIENCE DOESN’T INVENT.

THEY EXPERIENCE.

AND THAT’S WHAT THEY WANT.

MATRIX.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Part 3, What is The Matrix

Part 3, What is The Matrix

The Yin Yang Experiment

by Jon Rappoport

July 4, 2011

Let’s pretend that a few Chinese sages, long ago, decided to float a trial balloon.

They spread the word that opposites could resolve in a state of harmony. Each polarity could reflect the other.

It was a poetic thought that might be embedded in a few verses.

The sages watched and waited. Eventually, they saw that this fancy had taken hold. In fact, it had become embedded in a philosophy. It was now being discussed as a principle of the universe, the cosmos.

The sages were shocked but not surprised. Humans exhibit strange fetishes.

What started out as a poet’s passing rumination on a summer afternoon—entertained purely for the purpose of writing verse—was now an all-embracing weave of the Matrix.

From the sages’ point of view, what might be done in a poem was far more important than what might be attributed to Universe.

I use this as an illustration of “piling on”–how humans add one idea after another, one speculation after another to a Matrix that is already built to give the impression that it is the prime reality.

Richard Jenkins, the extraordinary healer I write about in The Secret Behind Secret Societies, once told me, “The addiction to Universe is like every other religious addiction. People aren’t satisfied with just two or three myths. They have to keep making them up. It’s like children with dolls and clothes. You’ve got to have more outfits.”

The Matrix is made into a magnet. Instead of understanding that products of imagination are art, people have to embellish the Matrix with those products. That gets them dug in deeper.

Nearly 40 years ago, I rented a garage in Santa Monica and turned it into a studio. It was small, and I wanted to paint large. I stretched three canvases, the biggest of which was 15×8 feet. Because there wasn’t enough room in the studio, I kept painting over that canvas.

Six months later, I had done perhaps 15 paintings on that one canvas—each painting covering the one before it. I’d used all sorts of paints—acrylic, oil, enamel. Finally, I painted the whole thing black. I looked at the black space for a few days, and I noticed there was a small glint of light green peeking through in the lower left.

I worked at the area with my fingernails, and suddenly a two-foot section of black came away like a swath of rubber, exposing many colors and shapes, which were intact.

I realized that, because I’d used different kinds of paint, I’d done distinct layers. The layers hadn’t adhered perfectly.

For the next week, using a screwdriver and a mallet, I uncovered painting after painting, going back in time.

Eventually, I arrived at a painting composed of several layers at slightly different heights. I liked it.

If the painting had been the Matrix, and I had been a devotee, I would have fallen on my knees at that point and said a prayer. I would have, for the moment, been happy I had determined how many layers (myths) were necessary to give me the One Painting For All Time. The religion of Matrix.

But it was a painting. And of course, since I was the artist, I knew that.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.