VACCINE DECEPTIONS
JUNE 2, 2011. In my radio show yesterday, I interviewed Becky Estepp for the second time. Becky is the project manager for EBCALA (Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law and Advocacy).
Here is what emerged.
Recently, California passed a law mandating the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine for all 7th-12th grade students entering school this fall. This piece of legislation was a response to new cases of whooping cough in California.
The state government is now carrying on a PR campaign to get parents to follow through and have their children jabbed with the pertussis shot. However, this vaccine is given in triple form—pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria. Therefore, the mandate in effect covers all 3 vaccines.
Except, despite what the state government of California states, it isn’t a mandate, because all three types of exemptions—medical, religious, and philosophical—are still available. Parents can make use of these. Becky explained how she did exactly that for her child.
Obviously, state health officials know these exemptions exist, and yet they are talking as if the exemptions don’t apply. That’s called deception.
Since the new law was passed (and what kind of law is it, really, if the exemptions still hold), the results of an investigation into the recent cases of whooping cough have been published. It turns out that 75% of these cases occurred in people WHO HAD BEEN VACCINATED AGAINST PERTUSSIS.
This is a stunner.
There are several possible interpretations. If one accepts the premise that vaccines are safe and effective, then one could infer that the pertussis vaccine is not effective in protecting people against the disease. If one doesn’t make that assumption of safety and efficacy, one could consider the possibility that the pertussis vaccine caused the illness in some or all of those people who developed whooping cough.
Meanwhile, the PR campaign to get parents to have their kids jabbed with the triple diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis shot goes on.
Some time ago, I wrote a piece outlining the conditions for a real study that would test any vaccine for efficacy. Length of study, size of groups of volunteers, how to match the groups in terms of nutritional status, past medical history, and so on.
I then asserted that NO SUCH STUDY HAS EVER BEEN DONE FOR ANY VACCINE. And I asked for proof such a study had been done. Since then, I’ve received no evidence. Nothing.
JON RAPPOPORT