by Jon Rappoport
July 24, 2018
(To join our email list, click here.)
“…intellectual freedom is a deep-rooted tradition without which our characteristic western culture could only doubtfully exist. From that tradition many of our intellectuals are visibly turning away. They have accepted the principle that a book should be published or suppressed, praised or damned, not on its merits but according to political expediency. And others who do not actually hold this view assent to it from sheer cowardice.” (George Orwell, 1953)
When those who control public discourse, in a nation, see that they are losing to upstarts, that their flimsy ideas are being supplanted by much stronger ideas, the shocked controllers turn to the more direct strategy of censorship.
In terms of substance, and even popularity, the ministers of truth are losing; so they abandon reasoned discourse altogether. They desert this fertile, competitive, and NECESSARY territory. They no longer debate. They ban.
Among their supporters are crowds of illiterates.
There are many people who, because their education was a vaporous thing, have no interest in the written or spoken word.
The reason is obvious: they can’t read.
Their natural impulse is to make excuses. “Who needs books?” “People who write books are showing their privilege.”
For these excuse-makers, book burning would mean NOTHING. All that matters is: what slogans should I shout?
For the illiterate, a book is a mystery. How could anyone put all the words together and write one? Somehow, the author must have a secret method of downloading the book from an elite source, a cloud, a machine, their DNA.
A book, a report, an article, a study, an essay—millions of people in “advanced societies” don’t have a clue. When censorship tightens, who cares? It’s just words.
IT’S JUST WORDS.
Elite societal players welcome illiteracy. They love it. It’s one of their cherished goals. Ignorance is good. More than that, illiterate people are easy to convince that repressive censorship isn’t a problem. It’s just something that “happens.”
If you don’t have “the right ideas,” you should be censored.
IT’S JUST WORDS.
Words are useless “things” like tacks and marbles and crayons and paper clips. Who cares?
“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.” (George Orwell, “1984”)
At its root, illiteracy becomes a form of reductionism. What can be comprehended, discussed, debated, or reasoned shrinks.
IT’S JUST WORDS.
Illiteracy is more effective than political correctness. Untold numbers of people can’t understand the sentences that are floating and flying by them every day. They register this by building up anger. Unfocused anger. They are perfect fodder for know-nothing social and political movements that requite violence and repression. After all, they were repressed, weren’t they? Weren’t they left hanging out in the wind by their education, their schooling? Now is the time for revenge.
They were limited in what they learned; therefore, limit everyone else. Why not?
IT’S JUST WORDS.
There is a sub-text percolating in many, many schools: “All right, you students, this is your education. We’re going to keep you from learning the language. We’re going to hold it back from you. At the same time, we’re going to praise you and push you ahead from grade to grade. You’ll know something is wrong. But you’ll accept what we do to you. It’s easier. You’ll take a ride through school, and then we’ll dump you out into the world. We’re making rebels wholesale. Ignorant rebels. Rebels without the tools for THINKING. You’ll have to find a place where thinking isn’t important. Good luck. Here’s a suggestion. Find a group where all you have to do is yell and throw rocks. Learn what to yell. Demand your right to get EVERYTHING FOR NOTHING. That is all.”
Do you want a piece of interesting news? I can offer it, based on my experience of the past 17 years writing online. The declining system of education creates a vacuum. And into that vacuum, writers who do value language step forward, and they do present actual ideas. This is a large vacuum, so it can accommodate many writers.
They are creating new realities.
And readers show up.
Miracle of miracles.
These writers and readers are the “replacement team.” They are standing in for the colleges and universities and the sloganeers.
They are not censoring themselves or anyone else.
They are proliferating language, not reducing it.
Here is the secret: the history of humans reveals that language does, in fact, expand. It doesn’t lie down and die. It doesn’t wait for know-nothings to catch up. It doesn’t wait for anyone. Poets and novelists and playwrights and essayists find and invent new branches of word and thought.
They are making the future every day.
And as far as pure ideas go, no matter how hard some people have tried, Jefferson and Madison and Tom Paine and John Adams are not dead yet. Their shaped principles embedded in sentences live on.
If at some point, the entire population of the planet were illiterate, except for four writers, those four would invent a new ocean that couldn’t be contained—and somehow, readers would show up.
Perhaps you think I’m describing a kind of magic, and maybe I am, but I’m also giving you ironclad fact. It has always been so.
The Internet may have been invented with machine language, but the writers who have appeared on it are multiplying their own language.
They are outdistancing the machine.
They always will.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
A MAP OF THE SHADOW DEEP STATE GOVERNMENT:
http://www.wethepeoplereport.com/deep-state-map/
WOW!
Thank you!
John 1:1
Think of how slaves were supposed to be illiterate with punishment for those who taught them in the past. Think of the poor serfs in Middle Age Europe who were not allowed to learn to read and write so that the cleric classes could control them. The desire for censorship/control leads to illiteracy, too.
“its only words, an words are all I ha-a-ave, to take your soul away ay ay ay ay . . . says the devil.
Wow, nail on head (I am long past surprised). Not that I’m a literary critic. Far, far from it. Only that I love words. Words, words, words. I have my dictionary app. I receive ‘word of the day’ notices. I make an effort to expand my vocabulary. Here are some recent words from said app…
epigone: an undistinguished imitator, follower, or successor of an important writer, painter, etc.
leonine: of or relating to the lion.
coeval: of the same age, date, or duration; equally old.
solecism: a nonstandard or ungrammatical usage, as ‘unflammable’ and ‘they was.’
and finally…
amamentarium: the aggregate of equipment, methods, and technologies available to one for carrying out one’s duties.
Oh hell yes.
Try using one of those words in conversation with someone whose every other word is ‘like’ (ie infected with the ‘like’ virus). Will that end the conversation abruptly? Uh, yeah. Would using such a word elicit looks of incredulity and maybe even covert or overt hostility? Maybe but it is probable.
What if more writers used “obscure” words in their blogs, essays etc? How many people would double-click on the word to even get a popup definition? I guess if they’re reading someone very literate, they might. Or they might stop reading and think, “pretentious bastard.” I don’t know; I’m just conjecturing.
So let’s have ’em, Mr R. Maybe you can break tha ice.
should be “armamentarium.”
“Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.”
– Gandhi (1869-1948)
“Once you learn to read, you will be forever free.”
– Frederick Douglass
OK…if words are just words then how can calling someone a racist epithet or a transgender s smear word be a crime?
If words are just words, then how can we have THOUGHT CRIMES?
Like Climate denial which disavows “consensus science”?
Oh i forgot…that is too “triggering”
Wait words are triggering
HOW CAN THAT BE?
It’s ridiculous to have “thought crimes” or “hate crimes” for that matter. We are free to think whatever we want, and no one truly knows our thoughts. It was a huge violation of rights when the courts started establishing “hate crimes,” it is just crime. Convictions should be based on objective facts, not subjective fuzzy feelings.
People who are quick to say that they are “triggered” when they hear something they don’t like that supposedly hurts their feelings are not mature adults. We older folks learned early on the meaning of “sticks and stones can break my bones but words can never hurt me.” When I hear hurtful words, I can step aside and consider the problem lies with the source.
How you feel is not my responsibility or concern, although I will add that I do not go out of my way to hurt others. But to be concerned about this generates self-censorship where we are afraid to say what we mean for fear of reprisal.
Those college kids who were so quick to be “triggered” are not ready to be in college. Nor do I want to hire them for any job I may have. I need responsible adults, not babies, for work. Now it will be interesting who might be “triggered” by my remarks.
Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
The ignorant repeat the mistakes of the past.
Sticks and stones may break bones but words…are forgotten. NEVER!!!