Official science: the grand illusion for all robots
by Jon Rappoport
July 30, 2015
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
“Government science exists because it is a fine weapon to use, in order to force an agenda of control over the population. We aren’t talking about knowledge here. Knowledge is irrelevant. What counts is: ‘How can we fabricate something that looks like the truth?’ I keep pointing this out: we’re dealing with reality builders. In this case, they make their roads and fences out of data, and they massage and invent the data out of thin air to suit their purposes. After all, they also invent money out of thin air.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Totalitarian science lets you know you’re living in a totalitarian society.
The government, the press, the mega-corporations, the prestigious foundations, the academic institutions, the “humanitarian” organizations say:
“This is the disease. This is its name. This is what causes it. This is the drug that treats it. This is the vaccine that prevents it.
“This is how accurate diagnosis is done. These are the tests. These are the possible results and what they mean.
“Here are the genes. This is what they do. This is how they can be changed and substituted and manipulated. These are the outcomes.
“These are the data and the statistics. They are correct. There can be no argument about them.
“This is life. These are the components of life. All change and improvement result from our management of the components.
“This is the path. It is governed by truth which science reveals. Walk the path. We will inform you when you stray. We will report new improvements.
“This is the end. You can go no farther. You must give up the ghost. We will remember you.”
We are now witnessing the acceleration of Official Science. Of course, that term is an internal contradiction. But the State shrugs and moves forward.
The notion that the State can put its seal on favored science, enforce it, and punish its competitors, is anathema to a free society.
For example: declaring that psychiatrists can appear in court as expert witnesses, when none of the so-called mental disorders listed in the psychiatric literature are diagnosed by laboratory tests.
For example: stating that vaccination is mandatory, in order to protect the vaccinated (who are supposed to be immune) from the unvaccinated. An absurdity on its face.
For example: announcing that the science of climate change is “settled,” when there are, in fact, huge numbers of researchers who disagree. —And then, drafting legislation and issuing executive orders based on the decidedly unsettled science.
For example: officially approving the release and sale of medical drugs (“safe and effective”) which go on to kill, at a conservative estimate, 100,000 Americans every year. And then refusing to investigate or punish the purveyors of these drug approvals (the FDA).
For example: permitting the widespread use of genetically modified food crops, based on no long-term studies of their impact on human health. And then, arbitrarily announcing that the herbicide, Roundup, for which many of these crops are specifically designed, is non-toxic.
For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist and/or not proven to cause human illness (Ebola, SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)
A few of you reading this have been with me since 1988, when I published my first book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century. Among other conclusions, I pointed out that HIV had never been shown to cause human illness; the front-line drug given to AIDS patients, AZT, was overwhelmingly toxic; and what was being called AIDS was actually a diverse number immune-suppressing conditions.
Others of you have found my work more recently. I always return to the subject of false science, because it is the most powerful long-term instrument for repression, political control, and destruction of human life.
As I’ve stated on many occasions, medical science is ideal for mounting and launching covert ops aimed at populations—because it appears to be politically neutral, without any allegiance to State interests.
Unfortunately, medical science, on many fronts, has been hijacked and taken over. The profit motive is one objective, but beyond that, there is a more embracing goal:
Totalitarian control.
On the issue of vaccines, I’ve written much about their dangers and ineffectiveness. But also consider this: the push for mandatory vaccination goes a long way toward creating a herd effect—which is really a social construction.
In other words, parents are propagandized to think of themselves a kind of synthetic artificial “community.”
“Here we are. We are the fathers and mothers. We must all protect our children against the outliers, the rebels, the defectors, the crazy ones who refuse to vaccinate their own children. We are all in this together. They are the threat. The enemy. We are good. We know the truth. They are evil.”
This “community of the willing” are dedicated to what the government tells them. They are crusaders imbued with group-think. They run around promoting “safety and protection.” This group consciousness is entirely an artifact, propelled by “official science.”
The crusaders are, in effect, agents of the State.
They are created by the State.
Androids.
They live in an absurd Twilight Zone where fear of germs (the tiny invisible terrorists) demands coercive action against the individuals who see through the whole illusion.
This is what official science can achieve. This is how it can enlist obedient foot soldiers and spies who don’t have the faintest idea about how they’re being used.
This is a variant on Orwell’s 1984. The citizens are owned by the all-embracing State, but they aren’t even aware of it.
That’s quite a trick.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
1984 or Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Can’t help think that these two gents were the Seer’s of our time. Either that or they had an inside seat on the board!
Huxley was a a dangerous mind. He comes from a long line of eugenicists.
He is connected to the clap – trap of Darwins “Survival of the fittest” on one hand, and the the madness of the self proclaimed a polymath (the Irish should eat their young) Francis Galton.
Huxlry had deep ties to Tavistock.
I am almost positive that he had met Mr Wizard behind the curtain.
Eric Arthur Blair, the flip-side of the totalitarian coin…well that’s another story for another day.
“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”
– Aldous Huxley
http://tavistockagenda.iwarp.com/whats_new_43.html
https://archive.org/details/AldousHuxley–TheUltimateRevolution–ABlueprintToEnslaveTheMasses
Well spotted MB.
Blair/Orwell was also a “mouthpiece” for the Illumati aiming at cancelling any prospect of “rebellion”.
Definately the latter
Jon, Jon, isn’t it all too late?
The cattle are volunteering to be slaughtered/medicated and buying an expensive automatic rifle isn’t going to have any effect except make “Them” madder!
What “The Few” need to do is figure out our very own survival options and fast.
This last posting of yours unfortunately and very succinctly, lays out the end game.
Thanks for all your good work, as usual, but it isn’t anything new to the cognoscenti, is it and the sheeple aren’t listening are they?
We need survival options – time to quietly build our arks…….
What to do, what to do?
The answer is in the individual consciousness, believe it or not. It is NOT the end of the world–that’s what “They” want us to think.
They cannot engineer the future–they are trying very hard. This is what they are doing.
We need to be clear-eyed and see exactly what they are doing — which deconstructs their reality for us — and we need to wake up, speak up, speak out, and create our own new reality that opposes and counters theirs.
We don’t need guns for this, we don’t need mass movements — although masses of us awakening will help — we need the power of our own, individual selves and our own creative powers of reality-creation through relying on our own separate powers and skills.
We need to go inward and “find our joy” and exercise our dormant imagination and live in our joy, not in the fear they want us desperately to wallow in–fear is self-disempowering. Jon has written about this.
Read the very very enlightening Handbook for a New Paradigm by George Green.
Also see my posts at everydayconcerned.net under Consciousness tags,and visit Energy fanatics or omnithought.org.
Your individual consciousness is powerful, more powerful than you know–this is what they “They” want to keep you from discovering. See the post on Nassim Harramein at everydayconcerned and on Youtube–he is a quantum physicist who explains how individual consciousness affects the unified field.
Herd immunity, herd reality—we have to challenge this, it is in-your-face propaganda and outright deception. (Like “global” warming “world” hunger, and other such.)
Survival in physical means is stupid, as your idea of “bulding arks” in my hones opinion.
That’s one of the oldest catchphrase. You won’t have to ‘survive’ by any means, unless you create. That’s how you survive. Not by building an ark or some shiit like that.
Not focusing on “health” or “science”, I say, more or less, precisely what you say [as guest journalist] on GFM
http://globalfreedommovement.org/truth-for-virtuous-puritys-sake/
and on Ozzie Thinker
https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/violence-always-leads-to-attrition/
“I once wrote, ‘Of these born killers, the cowards join the ‘forces’” to summarise the difference between criminals and crusaders.”
“That was the excuse; the pretext. The real motive of intent was to promote the current state of apathy with pathetic peoples unable to defend themselves under the spell of one-sided, dishonest laws. Occasionally, even I succumb to their (those dreadful, deceitful propagandists) illusion. Take the word debate. I look up its meaning in various lexicons and find only variations of ‘argument’. The emphasis and point of engagements is missed. Where ‘debate’ separates from vulgar ‘argument’ is commonality and compromise are sought as consequence of sincere, considered discussion.”
Best
OT
@ leprechaun.oz
“I once wrote, ‘Of these born killers, the cowards join the ‘forces’” to summarise the difference between criminals and crusaders.”
The religion of fundamentalism is a strict task master.
Can we qualify ‘Cowards’ in this, as it would seem that that resulted after a long fight with the hero within.
It would seem that one must know truth in order to choose cowardice.
I think it’s a matter of belief and blind faith and obedience.
They live in a oh so small mind box…very tiny, with observable boundaries from its epicenter.
This really is: a remote controlled human.
MB you evaluate the “short form”.
Sentiment was inspired by three separate interviews:
First was with a Squadron Leader, second with a Captain and the third with a Brigadier. All said the same thing in not so many words,
“the reason [our boys] join the forces is they LIKE KILLING PEOPLE”.
Thus, the cowards can do what they enjoy – killing safely without any fear of reprisal. If is FAR more dangerous being a civilian in Iraq. Check the stat’s!
That is one great post from you OT, straight up fire and thought provoking.
Thank you, Gok.
Undemocratic Turkish earthquakes, NATO, “911” and Erdogan/Davutoglu sought refuge in one, I think!
Great info Jon!
In the realm of vaccines, that’s all I hear today is this new catchphrase: “the science is settled” or “the science is solid.” For example, try taking your unvaccinated/undervaccinated children to a pediatrician for a sport physical or something, and you’ll be bombarded with “the science is settled” on effectiveness & safety of vaccines. Even those friendly nurses like to get into the action by saying how “the science is solid” on vaccines.
Try talking to parents of vaccinated children who are terrified to have their kids come anywhere near unvaccinated kids. When we give them our reasons why we refuse/dissent from vaccines, they invariable respond that they watched some PBS science program on vaccines where it said “the science is solid.”
Try going on one of the science blogs stating that you refuse vaccines for your children. You’ll be with met with some of the most vicious, demeaning and degrading attacks because in their tyrannical mind, refusing vaccines regulates you to a 2nd class citizen because the “science is settled.”
I’m glad I live in a world where the “science” is so “settled” when it comes to vaccines. I should sleep much better now….
Remember Galileo? Substitute ‘government’ for ‘church’. Saying the science is settled means there is more control over the individual and he can be tried in the court of public opinion for heresy. Keep up the good work, Mr Rappoport, but I fear it is too late.
It is not too late. Rebellion must be subliminal and resilient. The “powers” will get the message and, given enough resilience, change tack. It will mean “sacrifice” for the thinking middle classes, though.
The issue doesn’t seem to be “them” but, rather, “us” – the ones that sit on their hands whilst ever so quietly “crying foul”.
I’m sure that the readers of this blog want to better understand some of the very valid points made by the author. For instance, you may want to be able to intelligently discuss the pseudo-science of psychiatry and how it differs from real medicine and from the natural sciences. I highly recommend the almost 40 books of the late Dr. Thomas Szasz. “The Myth of Mental Illness,” far more than just a provocative title, is probably his most famous work.
Dr. Szasz, an atheist, co-founded an organization (CCHR) with the Church of Scientology. However, he was never a scientologist. He was an atheist. Scientology was the ONLY organization willing to provide money to hire lawyers to help free innocent people incarcerated in prisons called “mental hospitals.” Szasz would have co-founded an organization with any group willing to put up the money to try to free enslaved people. He would have done the same thing with the Catholic Church, Judaism, the Nation of Islam, protestant churches, the Church of Satan, and any other group. He was famous for his criticism of psychiatry and the “Myth of Mental Illness” long before this partnership.
I say this because people often dismiss his work by saying, “Oh, Szasz, that’s all that Scientology gobbledygook, ha, ha,ha, LOL.” Of course, no reader of the Jon Rappaport blog would be dumb enough to fall victim to that type of ad hominem argument. But, just in case, I thought I would mention this. If you have the requisite courage and intelligence (and you will need far more courage than intelligence), please do yourself the favor and start getting some Tom Szasz in your life. He was the greatest man of any of our lifetimes. We should honor him accordingly. Come find out what a valedictorian of the University of Cincinnati Medical School thought about the “medical specialty” of psychiatry and its consequences.
What makes everybody think sheeple should survive? Sheeple are for dinner, maybe lunch. Sheeple are background noise but who is the signal?