COVID vaccine: missing key

Where’s the wiggle?

by Jon Rappoport

November 18, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

—In the US alone, reported COVID vaccine injuries have topped 600,000. The well-known Harvard Pilgrim study concludes you should multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a true number—

In any field where information is vital, the omissions are often worse than the lies.

In this article, I point out one such glaring omission, when it comes to the safety of COVID vaccines.

Tracking vaccine injuries and deaths through reports to databases is one avenue; another avenue would be direct studies of people who have been vaccinated.

Proper studies have not been done. Omission.

This would be a proper study: For starters, based on what MANY clinicians are seeing, develop/confirm true markers for: blood clots, including micro-clots; specific heart dysfunctions; miscarriages; menstrual cycle disruption; infertility; toxic effects on cells (e.g., the presence of graphene oxide); the appearance of the spike protein in cells, in areas of the body where the protein should not appear.

Enroll, in a modest pilot study, 1000 people who have received one of the RNA COVID vaccines. Run tests on these people (blood, tissue, pictures) looking for these markers.

I’m NOT talking about a few photos of one patient’s blood. I’m talking about a full study of 1000 people, for starters.

You would think such a study has already been done, because only sheer ignoramuses or criminals would fail to realize that, when you inject people with substances, you should discover the effects BY STUDYING THE EFFECTS.

Somebody suffers a blow to the head, you take a picture of the head and look at the effects. Somebody injects a person with liquid containing 10 ingredients, you run tests to find out what negative consequences may have occurred.

Unfortunately, most people are so hypnotized by the IDEA of medical science, they assume that if a study hasn’t been done, it doesn’t need to be done.

Lab workers all over the world will torture test animals, by injecting them with larger and larger doses of a compound in a new cosmetic, to discover the dose that kills the animals. But doing harmless tests on people who have received a new vaccine is out of the question.

To gain insight on the scientists who refuse to run the tests I’m proposing on vaccinated people, these are the same scientists who say, “Yes, a number of people died after vaccination, but there is no evidence the injection caused those deaths.”

What they mean is, “We didn’t look to see whether the vaccine caused the deaths, and furthermore, we don’t know how to establish causation. We’ve never worked that out.”

Which is like saying, “The chemical that entered the river from a pipe in the factory? We haven’t done sufficient studies on the chemical to determine whether it causes cancer. Therefore, the 96 plaintiffs with cancer who are suing the company have no case. Causation cannot be proved. It will never be proved, because we will never study the chemical.”

There is another factor at work. Many people who are interested in scandals are only interested in the details of overt crimes. “They shot him and buried his body in a landfill? Are there pictures of the decaying corpse? The killer was married to the victim’s sister? Was she in on it?”

“Clinton and Monica in a little room off the Oval Office? Did you see the photo of the stained dress?”

If you tell these people the biggest scandal in a situation is OMISSION— what DIDN’T HAPPEN, WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE, BUT WASN’T—they fade out and walk away.

Ask these people the following question: Which would you prefer? LOOKING at one microscope photo of one drop of blood from one vaccinated person that might show a wiggling line that might be a live organism? Or KNOWING that the absolutely essential safety study of a vaccine that has been injected into 3.6 billion people has never been done?

“Let me see the picture. I want to see the photo. Where’s the wiggle?”

This article is for the people who give the other answer.

And for scientists who know that mass maiming and killing also involve a crime of omission.

“We know the vaccines are safe because we didn’t study the people who got the vaccine.”

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

37 comments on “COVID vaccine: missing key

  1. Paul says:

    in a modest
    pilot study,…”


    That’s a lot to ask, Jon.

    To Those,
    too consumed,
    with clipping wings.


    “You would think…”

    “To gain insight…”

    Only, for those
    who favor sight
    & seeing.


    “…we didn’t study…”

    ~ wiggle wiggle

  2. Tracy Kolenchuk says:

    It’s the “ignorance effect”. A common medical term, but that term sounds neither mystical nor medical, so we use different names: “placebo” and “side”.

    Placebo effects are real positive effects that – in the opinion of the approved physician, are NOT caused by the treatment. Their true cause?

    Nobody cares, because if the true cause is identified, it’s a real effect, not a placebo effect. Look-away.

    Side effects are statistical negative effects. Real cases are ignored, because side effects are statistical.

    Anyone who claims a real “side effect”, is either ignore (at best) or branded as “pseudoscientific” – like autism caused by vaccination, because side effects, like placebo effects, do not have a cause. If a cause can be proven – unlikely – they become real effects, not side-effects.

    • stephen langley says:

      Well said. Underscore to two of your points: “side” effects &
      “placebos”. There are only effects; “side” effects are obvious subterfuge. Regarding the placebo effect, when the importance of mental-emptional-psychic energy is fully investigated it will be found to be the single greatest factor in maintaining health. For unequivocal science pointing clearly in this direction, see the work of Wim Hof, “the iceman” who teaches others how to consciously influence, regulate and control one’s autonomic nervous system… including immune system response to a pathogen injected directly into the bloodstream, as one of the scientifically controlled studies unequivocally (one hundred percent) demonstrated. Monks, yogis & other adepts have been practicing such techniques for millennia.

      The big lie of the current reductionistic materialism paradigm of Life & Creation is finally beginning to give way to the Truth of the power of consciousness to create our individual and collective “reality”… which obviously includes the entire human spectrum of the immaterial & material. Cheers.

      • Tracy Kolenchuk says:

        Webster’s definition of Placebo Effect is clear and matches the definition used by doctors and researchers.

        “improvement in the condition of a patient that occurs in response to treatment but cannot be considered due to the specific treatment used”

        “cannot be considered due to…” is an opinion. An opinion of the doctor or the researcher who observes a real effect, an “improvement”. If we remove the opinion, it is simply a real effect, with a real cause. If we find the real cause – it becomes a real effect. Every case of placebo effect is a real effect, caused by the cause, so it’s not a “placebo effect”.

        There are no limits on the “actual cause” of a “considered to be a placebo effect”. The beliefs of the patient or the patient’s culture, etc., are often cited, but placebo effect is not limited to those causes – and no causes are proven. Once a cause is proven – even by changing the color of a pill from red to blue, it’s no longer a placebo effect, it’s a real effect.

        Placebo effects are bunk. Lies.

        • “Every case of placebo effect is a real effect, caused by the cause, so it’s not a “placebo effect”.

          Is nocebo effect bunk lies also?


          A substance that causes undesirable side effects as a result of a patient’s perception that it is harmful rather than as a result of a causative ingredient.A substance which a patient experiences as harmful due to previous negative perception, but which is in fact pharmacologically (medicinally) inactive.

    • Michael Burns says:

      Polyvagal theory?

      It genuine, and easier than becoming a Yogi…

      Placebo/nocebo, hell that’s exactly what they are up, drug studies always wash out the placebos, never the Nocebos yet the study of such phenomenon are lacks and looked at as pseudoscience.

      At present the Nocebo effect is in full measure, and with cortisol and adrenaline and the visceral effects of this little game going on, people are getting truly sick, moreso as illness in the long term. Which as we know is a war of attrition. And this being only one aspect of this total war against people.

      The Placebo/Nocebo effect is a spectrum like phenomenon, some have a little some have a lot, some can manifest the darker side of it as an OCD or in the case of Hypochondria.

      Nocebo is, a real effect and if the vaccine being administered under a protest of the vaccinated, even if they are timid and are self-censoring the protests. The effects are still as real, and they are getting sick, really sick, not pretend sick.

      But then don’t they know all this, in this death by a thousand cuts.

  3. Arby says:

    “To gain insight on the scientists who refuse to run the tests I’m proposing on vaccinated people, these are the same scientists who say, “Yes, a number of people died after vaccination, but there is no evidence the injection caused those deaths.”

    “What they mean is, “We didn’t look to see whether the vaccine caused the deaths, and furthermore, we don’t know how to establish causation. We’ve never worked that out.””

    RFK Jr, and others, have noted that it’s actually quite hard to demonstrate how a vaccine caused an injury. That’s not the same as saying that it’s obvious that they are. It is obvious. It’s more obvious to some than to others, in fact. If vaccines and the mRNA and so-called viral vector covid shots are nothing but poison…

    Still, RFK Jr, I believe, is controlled opposition. Why do I believe that? I believe that because he is too smart (smarter than I am) to not know that germ theory is bunk. (And people like him are too smart to not know that Darwinian functional evolution is nonsense, but that’s another story.) Therefore, It’s hard for me to know when someone like RFK Jr is telling the truth or lying. I want to defer to his vast knowledge (germ theory or not) and accept what he’s saying about the difficulty of proving damage from vaccines. But is that him helping the hoaxsters out with some lifting?

    Interestingly, Del did an interview with Josh Sigurdson (World Alternative Media) who I find to be rather uninformed. That isn’t to say that Josh doesn’t do hard, good journalism. But I believe that some of those who are busy doing one thing, namely investigative journalism, are not busy doing another, namely investigating germ theory or particular aspects of it, like the subject of virus isolation. Ergo…

    In the interview, Josh (to his credit) asks Del about virus isolation, noting (because he needed the justification?) that his donors (my word) asked him to ask. Del’s response, which I’m guessing, was both disappointing and revealing.

    I excerpted that part of Josh’s interview and put it up on my Bitchute channel (“Arby”):

    I very much like Jon’s suggestion.

    • Eluard says:

      Arby, I just watched that excerpt with Del Bigtree. Thanks for doing that.

      Del states that he’s had “both” viewpoints, no virus, and definitely virus, on his show. That’s a big distortion right there–he did have Kaufman on in August 2020 but I believe that’s about IT–the rest have been the “renegade” doctors and epidemiologists who certainly oppose the tyranny but certainly believe in the virus. Never had Jon on or Cowan or Lanka.

      Del admits there that the virus might not actually “exist” yet he’s taken the germ theory route because it’ll be much easier to “win the battle” that way. He doesn’t believe people can “handle the truth” so to speak.

      Perhaps. But more importantly, for Del’s career, HE couldn’t handle the drop in viewership (donations) were he to take the harder (more truthful) road. I don’t think he’s “controlled” opposition. But he sure DOES control himself.

      • Rasili O'Connor says:

        Breath of fresh air, to read what you wrote Eluard. Thank you for voicing this.

      • Orpheus Owl says:

        I agree that Del goes along with “but the Virus is REAL!” contagion myth so as not to alienate or outrage viewers. But a lie is a lie, whether perpetrated ignorantly or deliberately.

        As for RFK Jr., I get a sense of decency from the guy. I used to think he was ‘controlled opposition’ when he kept harping on the mercury angle (just take out the mercury, then vaccines will be safe) Is he unable to see the big picture? He’s certainly exposing the damage that vaccines do, so I guess that’s all we can expect from public personas with PR agents.

      • Arby says:

        Well put. I just saw your reply. Unfortunately, not all forums have automatic alerts when people respond to their comments. And I really flit around.

        I don’t know absolutely that Del is controlled opposition, but I don’t see any difference. But you’re probably more right to withhold that label than I am right to attach it. Still, It makes me angry. The way I look at it, If he isn’t, then maybe he can shape up. If he is, then he deserves to be jabbed by people like me calling him controlled opposition.

      • Rasili O'Connor says:

        And now, Patrick Gentempo (of the currently running ‘C-Revealed’ series) is saying (in an email sent today) that,

        “…Ironically, after working for months on our newest docu-series C*V*D Revealed…I myself got C*V*D and for me, it was tougher than I expected…”.

    • michael burns says:

      Behind closed doors big pharmaceutical have admitted that it is impossible to make a safe vaccine. They could not make a vaccine 100% safe. There would always be a few that would have extreme adverse effects, and death. And that many would have minor inconveniences…common adverse effects.

      Bobby Kennedy admitted having this knowledge, as the debate went to government and to allow the public to sue the vaccine manufacturers would make it extremely hard if not impossible to make a profit…and so the vaccine act of 1986 where the taxpayer picked up the cost of those lawsuits.

      Reverse that one act and place the cost onthe backs of those who profit and doors open wide.

      H.R.5546 – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 made it a highly profitable for a drug company to make vaccines.

      Pandora’s box is opened and we now even vaccinate dogs and cats and guinea pigs and budgies…speaking of dogs, dogs are a carrier of corona viruses?

      Should they be masked? I being facetious.

    • Ragtime Reggie says:

      Controlled opposition absolutely, Even Jon is, I mean really, who publishes this and stays on the net?

      • Michael Burns says:

        “[…]Even Jon is, […]”

        Care to elaborate on that? I would like to hear your thoughts on that, really!

        Jon was shut down a while ago on WordPress he lost all his pages, and when one searched, the blog did not exist, and was down for sometime. I think it was close to three months. They just shut his account down, that he was publishing on for years, over a decade I think…there use to be a WordPress banner across the top of the blog page. A link to WP users to connect back to their own WP.

        I see he still uses the WP theme, but when you do a search on WP he is not there, no Jon R or NMFN?

        I’m not sure how he publishes now, I think it is a stand alone. I know a lot of other publishers have given space during his shutdown, his blog was hard to get during that time, as they where trying to silence him — he was speaking about vaccinations and their connection to autism and growing childhood disease, and I think that was the reason for the censoring, correct me if I am wrong.

        But controlled opposition?

        Kennedy’s are blue bloods, and JFK jr make a goddam fortune of all this…is Kennedy CO? I think lawyers make agreements behind closed doors. And he is a Harvard lawyer. Kennedy helps take the violence out of what should happen to these SOB’s, and gains its exposure in the courts under litigation, which is more democratic, and JFK is a Democrat, like his father and Uncle.

        Which could be Controlled opposition.

        At one time I thought Jon was a honey pot, or a limited hangout to some extent, but as you can see with the COVID nonsense he has been pounding on the subject day in and day out now for well over a year.

        My blog has gone nowhere, even though I have things to say — I don’t know if I could do the same as Jon for over a year. He truly is a dedicated and courageous journalist.

        To tell you truth, I am tire of the word, Covid, and would like to never ever hear that word spoken in my life again.

  4. Eluard says:

    It’s amazing that most of what Jon writes about seems esoteric, in terms of consciousness and insight, but it’s not. It’s actually very straight forward and common-sensical.

    Gee, have we studied the effects of this experimental shot on those we’re giving it to? No. Okay, that’s how we do it. What?!!

    If you look at his articles going back to early 2020 it’s the same. Sewage opened up into a community. Could that be related to people there getting ill? No, it’s a virus. And so on. They’re making a vaccine for it, don’t worry.

    It’s all entrainment and hypnosis. That’s why most people can’t see it. The shockingly obvious. That’s why when we try to talk to them the eyes glaze. We have to keep trying I suppose. But the direct methods don’t seem to work. Just being an example, perhaps? Open for questions?

    4 Billion they say have taken this “thing.” If true, that’s more than half the people on the planet. Yet they’re still desperately pushing it. That’s a clue.

    • “4 Billion they say have taken this “thing.” If true, that’s more than half the people on the planet. Yet they’re still desperately pushing it. That’s a clue.”

      Really? A clue to what?

      A clue to the preload of mRNA, and one day if needed they push a button and a microwave signal over fondle slabs kills have the planet or turns them into zombies or increases Covid deaths as this entrainment is teaching?

      I don’t believe a single word they say, I am in the dark and have been that way my whole life, they made sure of that, and so I do my own reading and research and using the tools of logic and critical thinking, I try to find the truth and there really is not too much of it!

      We live in an ocean of lies.

      If the Reality Manufacturing Machine has been up and running since Jesus was a cowboy and the whole process is too keep the population confused and watching shadows on a cave wall then why would 4 Billion be of any significance at all. Why 7 to 8 billion actually people living on this planet? maybe its only a 3 or 4 billion or less. How would one know without checking using their facts?

      Why put any truth into anything if your are the controller of the narrative? Make the whole story up. Like Plato has previously stated in his allegory.

      Maybe there is thirty billion people are living on this planet, or 300, which would make that number of 4 shrink considerably if true.

      Its about lying and buying, selling and making money, its about controlling populations by a psychopathic elite.

      Do you see that fucked up, cowboy hat wearing twit Bezos question a step he takes, front , back or sideways, or how about Bill? Or Elon? How about Al Gore, he’s never been so rich with his made crib back upped onto the Pacific Ocean — he’s not worried about a flood!

      They have made this the record year of capitalism,a boondoggle of a year; divested from oil and crops, and in what is truly needed and made the benchmark of investments, history was broken in a scamdemic which has sold how much fake vaccine, and put how many Mom and Pop made businesses out of business. It has made how many more people in the world poor?

      They all jumped roughly ten billion dollars upwards and have vastly more control; they own the Commons; they own Hollywood and the media and Social media; they through the WEF have succeeded in planting their little androids minions in every major financial, education, social engineering, cultural, religious institution of civilization on this planet, while at the same time promoting Unity politics to the whole world through the fake United Nations. And brainwashing the mass that the health care system is about keeping you healthy. The education system is there to teach. And that Technocracy will save the world, and in all that, you don’t even know if is broken or not.

      Its an illusion, a fake reality, it always has been, see as such or forever be deceived..

      • Eluard says:

        I meant, echoing J.R., a clue that they need, apparently MUST HAVE, as many of us jabbed as they can get. I think it’s a numbers game for them.

        It doesn’t matter how “many” of us there are. You can see the desperation.

        And regarding the fake reality, that’s the realest thing you wrote above.

      • Geo Martin says:

        I understand the sentiment, but we are not in a ‘fake reality’; the sun rises everyday the same, animals in nature behave exactly the same way all the time, the ‘laws of physics’ never change, no one ever goes out into ‘space’, nothing ‘evolves’ into anything different, etc.

        Everything is the way God created it.

        We however, have misplaced our freewill and ability to create, therefore have strayed from our creator and his laws to create our own.
        We, do not have the capacity to be God, however we think we do. It is the fallen condition of man, never will make sense to you that comes from man because it doesn’t, only the things we do that are ‘unconscious’ therefore still coming from our inner God made being, like a gut feeling, or a bout of creativity, or hunger for truth.

        You don’t need to try to make sense of the ‘consensus’ of science, nor demand ANY truth from a fellow human being speaking for himself or in the name of a group, only God will give you that.

        I don’t mean to sound preachy but it is what it is.

  5. Laura says:

    “Funny” how, for decades, “scientists” always say, “We don’t know what causes autism, but we KNOW vaccines don’t cause it.” Yah, sure. How do they “know” that? Vaccines are the common denominator that is ALWAYS ignored. The majority of children have had at least one vaccine or the heinous vitamin K injection (which is just as toxic).

    Having such callous confidence in the “safety” of vaccines one would think that the only 3 ingredients in vaccines were angel hugs, unicorn kisses and rainbow sprinkles. And now the cycle is repeating…”we don’t know what’s causing kids to drop dead from heart attacks, but it’s not from the COVID vaccine. They were just born that way.” (even though heart problems are listed as potential “side effects”). The carnage of vaccines continues. When we will ever learn that injecting a toxic soup directly into our bodies will never bring health and safety?
    Another clever tactic they use in testing the “safety” of vaccines is they don’t test the new vaccine against a TRUE inert placebo (saline). They typically use another vaccine as the “placebo” because it’s more “ethical” they claim. Apparently, the placebo that was used in the UK COVID safety trials was the highly reactive meningitis vaccine. That’s how they can cleverly declare that the new vaccine is “just as safe as the placebo” – because both are equally deadly.

    I read a book from 1920 called “The Horrors of Vaccination” by Charles Higgins. His wish at the end of the book was that the brutal practice of vaccination would be long gone in 100 years. Sadly, Mr. Higgins is turning over in his grave at the stupidity of society.

  6. The Watchman says:

    Good article as usual, Jon. Will be linking today as usual as well, @
    The main point is, is that they don’t actually care about tracking after the vaccines to show the causation. Maybe they already know the intended consequences!!!

    • Orpheus Owl says:

      They’ve been testing this particular mRNA concoction for YEARS. Not just on the thousands of lab animals they’ve tortured but the elderly, foster children, newborns, and tracking those in different age groups thinking they’re getting a ‘flu shot.’

      Anyone who thinks they HAVEN’T tested this stealthily for a very long time, readying it for just this time is underestimating their evil. They know exactly what the injection does — sicken, cripple, paralyze, lobotomize and cull.

  7. Opie Poik says:

    Watch Archbishop Viganò Deliver His Important Call of the Faithful to Resist Globalist Tyranny (11 min.)

    BTW, he’s not excluding anyone not of the faith. I’m an atheist and I agree with him, and with the related articles of Jon’s (Rappoport) the last couple of weeks.

  8. vakzine macht frei says:

    Everybody is missing the point. The point is : “you cannot use logic when talking to Borg drones.” Yes their connection to the Collective is not complete. They use external devices for that. But that does not mean that they can have independent thoughts.
    Logic is useless.

    • “Logic is useless.”

      I think not, do you understand that is more about you using it than who it is being used on?

      It is what anchors ‘you’ to the real You!

      “To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself — that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.”

      ― George Orwell, 1984

  9. JamesS says:

    The government is not even willingly to investigate other possible causes of these abnormal increases in adverse events and rare diseases. When I bring this up, people are programmed to tell me it is not the injections. It does not matter if it is the injections or not. What matters is the health authorities are willfully ignoring a major public health crisis.

  10. Lewis Papier says:

    The new Pope Anthony Fauci will never permit or even entertain the idea that there’s any kind of connection between the jabs and vaccine injury. After all vaccination is regarded as highly as Christians hold up Baptism as a sacred rite. Is it so far-fetched to believe that Pope Fauci will one day ascend to the presidency? Is it a stretch to believe some kind of “Emergency Succession Act” could be invoked to allow such a scenario to take place after Biden resigns due to full blown dementia? That scenario is entertained in my Twilight Zone spoof: Nightmare at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Please watch and share:

  11. Rick in Phoenix says:

    I wonder if the lack of a proper study is directly due to the lifting of liability afforded to big pharma? If that liability were still in place, the drug companies would have done follow-up studies on thousands of people by now and have even advertised possible side effects on tv ads like they do with other products.

    • Rick in Phoenix says:

      Jon: Enroll, in a modest pilot study, 1000 people who have received one of the RNA COVID vaccines. Run tests on these people (blood, tissue, pictures) looking for these markers.

      Rick says- great idea. I’ll shop it around to universities I used to be a fan of… University of Sudbury (Ontario, Canada), U of T, McMaster, U Waterloo… GCU in AZ. I’ll start with those and see how far I can penetrate their systems for pitching an idea for a study. Maybe a loose-cannon going for a doctorate might do it for his/her/LGBQT/ET thesis.

  12. Roundball Shaman says:

    “We know the vaccines are safe because we didn’t study the people who got the vaccine.”

    Basic tactic in the legal profession: Never ask a question you DON’T want the answer to.

    The Dark-Powers-That-Be- know what this whole agenda is about. They know what They created. They know its effectiveness (and what it WON’T do).

    They know what their goal and end-game is. They don’t need any studies or results because the program is moving along just fine. Better than as ever dreamed. They are awash in self-satisfaction and delight.

    Bonuses and cigars and fist-bumps for everyone. And Sainthood for Doctor Death.

  13. Jim Luscombe says:

    Love Ya Jon!

    Good work, buddy and I mean the entire body of your work.

    You have especially affected me with this one. I almost always agree, but this time I not only agree, but the physics of my thoughts got an angle, a dimension of thought added that wasn’t there before.

    Look at this side angle? I didn’t even know it HAD a side angle.

  14. Jimmy says:

    Love your work, Jon. Thank you for all you do.

    I’m skeptical of this number: 3.6 billion being jabbed. I don’t believe it’s anywhere near that, but if there is reliable data, I’d love to see it. I think the governments, the best liars in the world, have bloated the numbers just like they bloated the ‘covid’ numbers. hoping more people will roll up their sleeves.

  15. Alexis says:

    You were saying?

    Government agencies have no data but approve boosters anyway.

  16. Fred says:

    Due diligence is part of the Medical code. By not doing the post follow up of the jabs side effects, are they not in breach of their code and more?

  17. peter daley says:

    Great writing. You have the power of words.

    Best wishes for the success of your program.

Leave a Reply to Jim Luscombe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *