Why Twitter and FB must ban the NY Times

by Jon Rappoport

January 19, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

Message to Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey: you have to ban the NY Times. Now.

I’ve got the hard evidence.

The Times, on at least three separate occasions, has published terribly corrosive information that would destroy the official COVID narrative.

Do you realize what that means? People could form a different picture of the pandemic. They could, after reading the Times, decide the situation ISN’T DANGEROUS, AND THE LOCKDOWNS AREN’T NECESSARY. THEY COULD DECIDE ONLY A FOOL WOULD LINE UP FOR THE VACCINE.

I’ll lay it all out for you, dear reader. I’m sure you’ll agree Twitter and FB must take action at once.

ONE: September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

TAKEAWAY FROM THE TIMES: The vaccine clinical trials are ONLY designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

Therefore, the leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive.

Therefore, what rational human would choose to receive the COVID vaccine?

TWO: On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a long article headlined, “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.”

Its main message? “The standard [COVID PCR] tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus…Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”

“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

“On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.”

TAKEAWAY FROM THE Times: The 90% of people tested, who “carry barely any virus,” are FALSE POSITIVES. Up to 90% of ALL people who have been labeled “COVID cases” are not COVID cases. This fact would downgrade the pandemic to “just another flu season.” And there would be no reason for lockdowns.

THREE: NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests [PCR Tests] Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”

“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”

“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”

“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”

“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”

“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”

“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”

“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”

“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”

“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”

“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”

TAKEAWAY FROM THE TIMES: No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results, from lab to lab, has ever been done. At least a dozen very large studies should have checked for uniform results, before unleashing the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not the case.

Now imagine the scandalous information in these three NY Times articles appearing everywhere—on Twitter, FB, Instagram, etc. It would be terrible for Bill Gates, Fauci, and other great leaders in the Holy Church of Biological Mysticism.

Political leaders and public health experts would have, on their hands, a major refutation of their whole narrative about the “deadly pandemic.”

We can’t allow that.

We must protect the public from the Times.

The only way to achieve this is through censorship.

Ban the NY Times from Twitter and Facebook.

Do it now.

If Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg refuse, Attorneys General of all 50 states should sue them at once.

Freeze their personal and corporate bank accounts.

Place them on a special list of “COVID insurrectionists.”

As for the Times, seize their assets, remove them from online platforms, stop the distribution of their newspapers—using military force, if necessary—and cut off all communication from their wire service to other news outlets.

Keeping the public safe is paramount. This is our duty.




That is all for now.


[1] nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opinion/covid-vaccine-coronavirus.html

[2] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

[3] nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

49 comments on “Why Twitter and FB must ban the NY Times

  1. ReluctantWarrior says:

    The Comet

    A lone comet streaks
    Wistfully across the night sky
    Wagging its luminous tail
    Captivating gazing eyes,
    Born from the womb
    Of deepest space
    beguiling us
    With its fiery lace,
    The mystery of life
    Is our dream to keep
    That teases us
    In our waking sleep,
    That ignites
    The bonfires
    Of the imagination
    And the spirits
    Mystical coagulation,
    And from stellar teardrops
    Did the fate’s fashion
    The wonder of being
    Teased by the bloody myths
    Of love’s true passion,
    We are made from
    The stardust of eon’s past
    That formed the galaxies
    From clouds of gas,
    While life’s molecules
    Danced with waves of light
    As the thunder god’s
    Dreamed up the sweet agony
    Of earthly strife,
    As lightning streaks
    Lit up the night sky
    Poseidon’s tears
    Joined in the spectacle
    And in the dark of night
    Helped create
    Life’s sacred vesicle,
    From immensity to eternity
    We are castaways from oblivion
    Orphaned on these
    Stellar shores,
    What does it all mean
    This theater of the absurd
    Filled with wannabe poets
    And fancy whores,
    Why are we here
    Frolicking together
    Singing our melancholy arias
    Of love turned blue,
    Appearing for one brief moment
    As tortured souls
    Like the beautiful rose bud’s
    Sweet torment
    Dancing precariously above
    Bed of thorns,
    Living life’s inspiration
    With love forlorn
    And with all
    Those tears mankind has cried
    Our dreams on wings of joy
    May ride
    Above the fading echoes
    Of wailing lamentations
    Flying Into the face of
    Eternity’s sunrise.

  2. glenn says:

    While we are at it, the corona deniers must be removed from social media as well. And there is no bigger deniers then the politicians enforcing mandates and breaking them. What would the public think of politicians who spent many months speaking to the public and meeting with experts backed by big pharma not following their own rules? The citizens would think that their leaders know this pandemic is fake.

  3. From Elsewhere says:

    Oh, Warrior Reluctant, how I dream,
    To have a glimpse of what they seem,
    To what liberty and peace may mean,
    Under a mask, with a vaccine,
    As proof of crime, convict to deem,
    To end this greed, escape the mean.

    Just hoping to see their end, a new beginning, a restoration of kind human nature, smiling, happy… Soon!

  4. Arthur Danu says:

    CENSORSHIP IS FREEDOM! Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law. Love is The Law. Love Under Will.

    MIND CONTROL IS LOVE. Americans have CHOSEN to be the world’s policemen, sending their children to slaughter for the past 100 years. Why should we stop now?

    LOCKDOWNS LEAD TO PROSPERITY. They DO! China has made a fortune off of this pandemic, so too has Amazon.com and a lot of other businesses. Wall Street continues to sizzle, fo bizzle! Big Pharma is doing quite well. TV Advertising revenues must be through the roof, with so many viewers now forced to watch, being captive in their own homes.

    The ROCKEFELLER BUSINESS PLAN is a smashing success! Case dismissed!

  5. CHUCK says:

    Oh the irony! Another excellent exposure on the hypocrisy of FB and T while bringing out the truth about the plandemic.

  6. Brad says:

    A beauty! I think I’ll print out a few copies and leave them at locations where members of the obedient NPC crowd can pick them up and perhaps read before heading for the nearest trash can.

  7. Hugh says:

    FYI: Heads up Jon…
    Mozilla Firefox will not load your home page & hasn’t for several weeks…

  8. Hugh says:

    Correction: Firefox will not load your site from links you provide in daily emails…

  9. JJ says:

    The PCR test cannot be trusted to diagnose COVID19. Read the CDC’s PCR Test Instruction document posted on the FDA website to see why: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
    Go specifically to P. 40, where It clearly states: “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.” and “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” So, based on those admissions, it appears if you are carrying a cold or flu virus, you will likely test positive for COVID19. Keep in mind it is cold and flu season right now, so this will inflate the “numbers.”

  10. Firestarter says:

    Or ban the reputable BMJ!

    Peter Doshi presents evidence that the Pfizer vaccine study was unblinded and manipulated.
    There were supposedly only 170 “confirmed” COVID-19 cases that “proved” the 90% efficacy and minimal amount of adverse effects.

    170 “confirmed” cases is a very small amount of the 3410 “suspected” COVID-19 cases..
    Also troubling that there were considerably more “suspected” cases in the placebo than in the vaccine group – 1816 vs.1594. This confirms that the “scientists” suspected (or looked for!) “COVID-19” in the placebo recipients.

    That’s beside another subgroup of 371 test subjects that were excluded from the analysis for an unknown “protocol” reason.
    Even the 251 more trial subjects that were excluded from the vaccine group than from the placebo group for “protocol deviations” is higher than the 170 “confirmed” COVID-19 cases.

  11. lamberth says:

    Love your sarcasm Jon.
    The hypocrisy of all this is breathtaking.

  12. Paul says:

    “Message to
    Mark Zuckerberg
    and Jack Dorsey:
    you have to ban
    the NY Times.

    I’ve got the hard evidence.”


    You may be assuming too much dear Jon:

    Firstly, that they really care about the truth, reason, honest debate, scientific certainty (as best as can be determined until further data proves otherwise).

    Secondly, that “evidence” is noteworthy to them. Especially evidence outside their chosen belief.

    And thirdly, that they care about people.

    But your concern for the integrity of their platforms is noble.

    I’ll thank you on their behalf for that.

    “…and other great leaders
    in the Holy Church
    of Biological Mysticism.”


    “That is all for now.”

  13. silverpen123 says:

    I hope they purge everyone right out of their own social forum business. One of the better things to happen for the world and free speech.

  14. Saoirse says:

    Brilliant Jon. Just brilliant.

  15. Tom says:

    Dr. Allan Cunningham states that Pfizer’s 90% effectiveness rating fails to tell the story in a way that people can understand: “…to prevent just one COVID-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects, whatever they may be and whenever we learn about them”. DuckDuckGo Search: “lewrockwell.com mercola emergency covid 19 vaccines may cause massive side effects”.

  16. Rick says:

    NYTimes– “all the news that’s fit to print”– was great Sunday morning entertainment for me back in the day along with other newspapers. Jon points out something very interesting as I re-read his piece here for the third time trying to glock onto it. My mind is like that sometimes– I read something and it doesn’t stick until I ruminate and go back and back and back again. The New York Times. Billy Joel read the New York Times. It’s a famous reference point even though I stopped reading it years ago. It’s still a famous watering hole deeper than Facebook and Twitter– so Jon points out powerful points on this fake pandemic– now overshadowed by the fake election.

    I’ll likely come back to Jon’s piece again to summarize the references and print them out for my self published spiral bound booklet that debunks the pandemic. It seems to me to be that important. I can “sell” NYTimes readers on it… if I encounter them.

    Billy Joel’s reference to NYTimes is about 3 minutes into his New York State of Mind video– a young Billy Joel–

  17. Greg C. says:

    Now is a good time to reflect on how we let Trump softly lead the nation down the path of accepting the virus hoax. I wonder how much of the political drama of 2020 was purposely scripted as bait-and-switch. Actually I’m past the stage of wondering. Trump did his job masterfully. He reminded us constantly of the villain in the story, China, and the heroes, big pharma. For a little while he talked some sense about therapies that are proven effective to help people with symptoms. Then he got all wrapped up in ventilators, which are in fact proven death machines! 97% fatal! Yeah, let’s make more of those, distribute them everywhere. And operation “warp speed”!

    Let’s face it – any president of the U.S. is a puppet, no matter how great a guy he is initially, because of the nature of the office. Too much power with too much corporate influence.

    So let’s let go of the Trump dream. Don’t even think about 2024. Think about today and your own personal choices. How much can we hurt big medicine and big tech? They are the ones in control, the gov’t is just their instrument. Stop supporting them. Stop paying medical insurance. Stop consuming news, whether it is right-wing or left-wing. Fox got exposed, do you really think OAN is going to be any better? Social media is just another form of thought-shaping. Is Gab going to rescue us from Twitter? You see the pattern here. They always have an alternative ready for you to choose to keep things from collapsing. Got to keep the social machine humming along, keep people interacting the same way. No spontaneity, like in person interactions can have. They want to limit those permanently. People getting together are now considered dangerous, both medically and politically.

    The only way to be rescued is to rescue ourselves, to break our own chains. Gather in groups, publicly, and don’t let their groups define you. Ignore them. But most of all, guard your feelings. Watch them – notice how movies play with them, and condition you to be played! All news is like that too. Music, alas, is usually guilty too. Dramatic, beautiful, hypnotic, but mind-altering and not for the good. Religion without the music and special effects is OK, if you keep your wits and use it to learn more about your soul and how it thrives or dies.

    Money and social standing also take us on a ride. Acceptance by any group is a drug. We have some tough times ahead, so you might as well learn to live without them now.

    What’s left? Always be developing your own skills, practical or impractical – from solving equations to developing paranormal abilities to public speaking. You always have your abilities and no one can steal them from you. Go with that.

    • Jim says:

      Only the corrupt seek power. Ergo; there’s never been anyone in political office worth paying attention to. Excepting when you are tar and feathering them. Or hanging.

    • oranje says:

      A great post Greg. It expresses my own thoughts and
      more better than I could.
      I had a brief conversation with a woman in the
      street who was convinced that if I did not take the
      vaccine I would be spreading the virus. When I said
      “how can I spread the virus when I am not sick and
      haven’t got it” she replied “how do you know you
      haven’t?”. She had refused to walk past me on an
      empty sidewalk and had waited in a driveway. Many more must be as brainwashed as that.
      A brilliant exercise in mind control to get healthy
      people afraid of catching from each other a disease
      they don’t even know they’ve got.

  18. oranje says:

    Nowhere in the Times article on the false diagnosis of
    pertussis does it state or even speculate on what was the real cause of the coughing.

    I guess this backs up what Jon has said about other
    epidemics like the Zika virus in South America where the
    real cause was very likely pesticides.

    A convenient or profitable diagnosis can always be made
    or whatever fits an agenda.

    In the pertussis miss diagnosis case I suspect that any
    competent old school doctor could have said that
    clinically the signs and symptoms do not fit pertussis.

  19. Gordon says:

    Is it sarcasm? I thought he was being serious when he says censorship is freedom, mind control is love, lockdown leads to prosperity. If that’s really what he thinks then I must disagree

    Do you think the creators of FB and Twitter have a hand in this plandemic or are they just pawns to the secret planners?

    And I get why they wouldn’t ban the NY times, but if the media is controlled then why would the NY times publish articles questioning the pandemic, who allowed that?

    What’s the purpose if they dont want people to question the pandemic?

    • Jim says:

      To both give the illusion of being a real newspaper that dates to dissent and to test how well the mindless lemmings will still obey.

  20. No More Lies says:

    JJ: it’s always been about numbers. They’ll stop at nothing to brainwash news watchers with fear and false numbers. They will destroy the presidency with their false numbers, propaganda, Lies, deceit and, of course, FEAR! Scare three hell out of the elderly and those with weak minds that need someone else to tell them how to think and live.” You will only survive this planscamdemic IF you take the poisonous vaccine”. And now: we have Kamala taking the reins. We’re all screwed. Now, we’ll have to defend ourselves against the masked armies.
    Those without the ability to think critically, who believe the way to happiness is only achieved through that magical injection ????

  21. Tim_2A says:

    Tucker Carlson said, recently, that a so-called ‘servant of the people’ wishes to CRIMINALIZE THE PURCHASE, USE, OR POSESSION OF BODY ARMOR. WHAT??

    What would that (Demo-n-crat, of course) have in mind, when introducing such legislation?

    Should we be worried, if protecting ourselves from bullets is considered criminal activity?

    The two-part answer is: YES. HANG THE TYRANTS.


    • Jim says:

      I always hated body armor when I was in the army. Already carrying an armory on my back in extremely hot weather, and the armor just trapped all the heat. Better idea is to not get shot!

      • Tim_2A says:

        I’ll agree that getting shot is NO FUN, so don’t do it.

        When you were in the military, and you were in someone else’s land, ‘legally,’ YOU WERE DEFINITELY SOMEONE’S TARGET, whether you liked it, or not. No choice.

        Hopefully, you were NEVER shot.

        Still, regarding your comment, I could make another, that makes the same amount of sense:

        So as to never experience traffic jams, or road rage either, stop using a car, and ONLY WALK everywhere, from now on. Remember, no taxis, or Uber, or Lyft, either.

        Depending on where you travel, or live, BEING a target, OR NOT (or in a traffic mishap, even peripherally), isn’t necessarily a choice YOU’LL be allowed to have.

        Does your reluctance to protect yourself with body armor, now, mean that you agree with that Demo(n)crat’s position? I sincerely hope not.

        In the American military, ALL that is done today is quasi-‘legal’ intervention in other countries’ affairs, as it has been for far over a hundred years. Does EVERY OTHER nation on Earth SHARE ‘OUR values?’ THEY DO NOT. As such, we are put in harm’s way, and killed, for reasons unstated, yet NOT UNKNOWN.

        That is CHOOSING to get shot (at, anyway), but FOR WHOM?

        • Jim says:

          I’m not wearing body armor. Between the armor and the loot, you stand a better chance of becoming a casualty from heat exhaustion/stroke than you do by being shot. In war, generally the least amount of casualties come from being shot. All that armor wears you out,dulls your senses (can’t hear anything behind you with a helmet on), makes you slower, decreases your accuracy, and so on.

  22. yerba buena says:

    Thank you, Jon, for the genius of your breakdown of La Corona Hoaxola in such thorough detail and from so many different angles. Your beautifully written and
    profound analysis should easily bring you a Pulitzer Prize, for
    what that is worth. You have given many people a giant boost in
    awareness and knowledge, along with commenters bringing great thoughts and links, filling out the picture nicely. That is very
    helpful and makes this past year one of profound metanoia.

    The changing of the guard is kabuki theatre after all…Trump and
    the Demonic Rats share roughly equally in the crimes and lies and
    a true justice would entail criminal prosecutions across the board.
    The Reptillians and Demonrats have mostly acted shamefully on the
    world stage, and as you wrote many moons ago, “There will be hell
    to pay” for the destruction of the lives and livelihoods of millions of people around the Earth.

    From the beginning of his term, Trump followed Obama in waging war
    upon Yemen in cruel and tragic ways. A tag team of Presidential
    bullies has committed war crimes for all the world to see. This is
    a distortion and perversion of Natural Law. Planetary crimes need
    a world court to prosecute the perps. I do not remember Joe Biden
    ever saying a word against the drone warfare on innocent men women
    and children, or any other of the crimes of his chief commander.

    I have been greatly enriched through the writings of many courageous souls in your wonderful forum. Keep on living and loving
    and fighting for the freedom of the soul, good people. Om Shanti

    of people.

  23. Arby says:

    Jon: Indeed!

    General: Tony Fauci, by the look of things, might become an ‘accident’ – if people take David Martin’s dossier on him and run with in sufficient numbers. I know that I’d like to see it. David offers it to others on the condition that they do something positive with it. I am a blogger, so I think that that qualifies. I realize that what he has in mind is more along the lines of take this dossier and what’s in it to someone in authority who take legal action against the criminal Tony Fauci.

Leave a Reply to Arby Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *